@@RiverDanube sorry it’s just I’m not a Beatles fan, never was in fact, my brother tourtured me as a kid with Beatles music, he wasn’t a musician , I was , but hey dude and let it be broke my heart, it’s all he listened to, 😂, while I was on learning stuff , on the likes of free, Rory Gallagher, Floyd , thin lizzy and so on, every time I wanted to learn stuff, the bloody record player would be banging out Beatles, it was tourture, specially having to hear him trying to sing along 😂😂😂
Paul has way more patience with these repetitive questions year after year than most people would. He's always acknowledged that the extreme level of fame that came with the Beatles is decidedly a two-edged sword and that he had to go back through this over and over. At the end of the day they are four guys that grew up in that incredibly intense environment and, as adults, had to move on. There was plenty of magic in that particular combination of talents and I'm glad we got Abbey Road before they had to let it go.
My thoughts exactly. Enough. He admitted after Peter called him in while editing get back that none of those stories were what they became over the years.
Yoko could have at least stayed in the control room... out of the way. She knew what she was doing and didn't care. Unfortunately John didn't care either.
The Beatles gave us 100 years of amazing music in 7 years. Appreciate what we have. I always felt like all their amazing solo work would have just been Beatles songs. Feel glad for George to get all his music out. Arguably the best solo album out of them all after the breakup…
They all defo loved each other like brothers. I'm glad Paul and John were cool before John was passed. 🙏🏻👍🏻 I love the Beatles, even when they all went their own was,they were still brilliant.
There was a great article in Rolling Stone "Why the Beatles broke up" (Sept 3, 2009) that directed the breakup, I recommend reading it. Paul was constantly prolific, and his enthusiasm challenged Johns supremacy in the group. This led him to seek out a partnership outside the Beatles which allowed him to be the uncontested leader. Yoko provided John with this and introduced him to heroin. George greased the wheel of the breakup with his sour attitude . In the 'Get Back' movie, there is the scene where Paul and John are talking, after George had left the group, and Paul is reassuring John, telling him that he is the leader. That's just my read of the situation
The number one biggest thing that broke the Beatles up, by all accounts, was Allen Klein. Paul, George and Ringo put up with Yoko when she emerged, she wasn't as big a problem as it has been made out to be, really. But Allen Klein was the straw that broke the Beatles' back.
Of course Yoko was a big problem: She schemed her way into the Beatles, opting for John after Paul rejected her. She was in Cynthia's home cheating with her husband and never said a word when Cynthia turned up. Her life was so empty she was in the studio all of the time interfering with their creative process. Paul, Ringo and George are on record as having hated it. John would have gone ballistic had any of the other wives been around all of the time. Their tolerance was extraordinary. She sang like a squealing cat on recordings like Bungalow Bill. She took John to NY, one of the most violent cities in the world where he was shot dead. She has treated Julian like he's dirt. She set Paul up to be busted in Japan. She has claimed joint writing credit for Imagine. Virtually everyone skips her tracks on Double Fantasy as they're unlistenable. She arranged for John to have an affair with May Pang. She's a sociopath who has done no good and been motivated at all times by personal gain.
It was because John wanted a change. He was tired of the same old thing. He met Yoko and she brought a new wild perspective to his life and he ran with it. You can tell by the freakish music they made of them yelling and recording it. It was total bs. He thought it was new age. John was so incredibly talented, but Yoko brought him down. They were both doing heroin and it was his undoing.
13:55 Paul said the last time he's spoken to John, John expressed not being all that interested in music anymore. Double Fantasy came out that year. Either John kept it from Paul, or it was a good stretch since they'd spoken. Either way is kind of sad.
Makes sense. John was veering off into more political territory toward the end of his life. Who knows; had he lived, he may have become a politician! It reminds me of how Jim Morrison was fast losing interest in recording and performing music with The Doors at the tail end of his own tragically short life.
Imagine how tiring it is for them to still have to talk and answer about these things after so many years... come on, guys, turn the page, enjoy the music and art of them
I agree! But because there are so many different angles of thought on Paul’s, Ringo’s, and Rock and Roll historians’ parts regarding every moment of The Beatles’ existence, there will always be old-new insight to share and explore with the world. Plus, regarding John and Yoko specifically: the fact that December 8th marks the anniversary of his assassination always causes the topic of their relationship to boomerang back into the media spotlight.
Yoko certainly was a disturbance in the studio but the rest of the band got used it in hindsight even though John could have said that he was deeply in love with Yoko which probably would less awkward than what actually happened
They never got used to it, as Paul states in these clips. Read May Pang's book - John's marriage to Yoko was a scam. he planned to leave her many times but she trapped him. Even the album Double Fantasy gives the game away that it was all a scam fantasy.
I remember reading an interview with George talking about how Yoko always smelled bad “like rotting fish” because of her poor hygiene from never showering.
I never understood the breakup thing. If you're getting on each other's nerves or if you want to spend time with Bob Dylan and the band or do something different for a while take a break from each other. Take a year or two off. Why do you have to legally break up the band? I don't know, maybe my ignorance is showing.
One thing I didnt know about Yoko until recently which I think is an important insight into her character, is that she was actually upper-middle class in Japanese society. That is she had a sense of entitlement and self-importance; its actually a feature of people from that segment of society world-wide. So combine that with John's need for a mother figure, and his ongoing identity crises and angst, its easy to see that it was just the perfect storm. So Yoko just glommed on to him and rode his success for her own ego trip to be a famous and important artist. Otherwise she would have lived her whole life in obscurity (like the rest of us).
Total racist nonsense. Paul has said over and over, Yoko Ono did not break up the Beatles. You've just made up this nonsense about she "glommed" onto him.
@@patricias5122 OMG can we please stop labeling every critique about Yoko as 'racist' or 'sexist'? It literally has nothing to do with her being japanese or a woman, TF. I swear... Everytime someone makes an observation about Yoko it's always the same type of answer from her defenders. Such a stupid way of arguing. Everything the commenter said is true and is a well-known fact about Yoko. Also, the fact that Yoko wasn't the main reason Beatles broke up doesn't exclude her from any type of criticism. Yes, the Beatles could've broken up if Yoko was never there, but her presence made things worse 100%, and that's something fans don't appreciate for obvious reasons. She knew her presence there was making things worse but who cares, right? It's not her fault after all 🙄. She never cared about the Beatles, and that's a fact she herself admitted. She actually encouraged John (while still in the band) to start a new project with her. She totally is an entitled person who didn't care about anything but her own intentions. So yeah, was Yoko the main reason The Beatles broke up? No. So what? Does that excuse her from every responsability and consecuences of her actions? Also no. She's no saint and as Julian Lennon said about her: she knew what she was doing from day 1.
John Lennon was a complicated man, but so it goes with a genius. People who knew him well held him in high esteem and spoke of his kindness and compassion. To call him a jerk, and never having known him, is nothing short of wretched arrogance.
Or spouses in general. My husband and I don't follow each other to work. We support each other and if there is a work related function where significant others are invited we attend meet their colleagues.
@@JRAw89 Linda sits on the side when the Beatles are working on a song while yoko sits there in the group like a bump on a log! That's what is shown on the get back dvd's
@@patricias5122 It's not hate, it's more of a nauseous reaction, much like Chuck Berry's reaction to her caterwauling screaming during his performance one time. His expression says it all...
If Yoko was anything, she catalyzed an existing disenchantment in John vis a vis The Beatles. If Yoko hadn't shown up, it would have been something else.
i can't fathom how at least anyone can come away with a good faith reading of the GET BACK doc with any other conclusion than this. the lady doesn't deserve the level of ire she gets (at least for this)
Lorne Michael's offer was $3000.00. I think SNL's standard fee for a live music act, at the time. Hilarious, as there'd recently been a promoter who floated $50 million for a single show (which would be filmed), which garnered press since in 1975 that was a ginormous sum.
I think the only reason he made the effort to get along with her is money. Besides needing George's, then Olivia's, and Ringo's approval for any post Beatles projects, he needs Yoko's ok as well. And we're talking a lot of money. So better to have a reasonable relationship with her and rake in the dough, than hold a grudge and give up all that green. It's in her best interest too. And if anyone wanted to make a dollar off of John's memory, it's Oh No.
All families have their feuds. It was all just part of the zeitgeist and similar things happened to other groups. The Supremes broke up in 1969, Janis Joplin died in 1970, Jim Morrison died in 1971,Jimi Hendrix died in 1970. The Rolling Stones didn't matter much after 1971 or 1972. It was all just meant to go that way.
That is true but obviously they were not a family, not brothers. They were some teenagers that made music together for 10 years, for fun and profit. After 1969 they never played together or were photographed together again. If that is a family, it’s a very bad family!
I watched the Get Back film when it came out and there is this moment where Paul McCartney's wife Linda is shown with Yoko and they are talking back and forth just chatting. All through that film you can see how they really were all close and the one moment when George Harrison walks out over a legit problem. They all went to him and fixed that. I never understood why John and Paul never made the other 2 equals. It never made sense to me that they just seemed to not see that this was pretty much the most largest thing. I mean you can see GH just over it... and had decided to just be more assertive and demand songs of his be on albums, and you can sense that 2 people are working long hours to make Paul and John wealthy and when they came with music John and Paul just did not place that same energy. I still love them... but I think Ringo and George should have been made equals. However clearly Paul IMO was like the one who not only wrote his own stuff but saw many times a song that John was just starting Paul was able to arrange it and John needed Paul... It just shows you that the media creates all this friction and even shows them reading the papers laughing at all the stuff written about them when there was no way that the media could know this since they were on film all day in the studio and anyone who believes anyone in the media or manipulates the media are suckers.
My interpretation of Get Back was that in many ways, Ringo was the leader of the band. When George walked, they said they could get Clapton in a second. When Ringo walked they really didn't know what to do.
No one is perfect. I’m glad Paul found some peace with their friendship. They both lived and respected each other, but I can see in the old photographs and video and in interviews to this day how much Paul admired and adored John. He always got the shit end of the stick in the press when he was definitely the only reason they ever made it. Paul was the one into the art seen and added all the sound effects on Tomorrow Never Knows while John was stoned all day. Don’t get me wrong. I probably listen to John a little more than Paul. His bratty anti behavior resonated with me when I was a kid. But if you look into the music you can see that Paul had plenty of music with just as much balls as John and I love his upbeat songs too. Paul pushed them to practice and record. John was apparently quite lazy when it came to recording, which is why I love him so much. The guy was limited in music theory and created some of the best work of all time. He didn’t have all 6!strings when he met Paul and played banjo chords. He went from zero knowledge to throwing away songs that are better than most musicians will ever create. Anyway, that was my gay take. I love this band. They have been a constant in my life and they split 20 years before I was born. John had been dead for 8 years when I was born. They were special. All that talent in that band coming from the same English city is remarkable. I get excited when I catch something Beatlie in other artists songs. They’ll always be my number 1
@@scottudell7202 Paul states in the clips here that they hated her presence in the studio from when John met her in 1966 right up to 1969. Three years of, rightly, being sick of her is not "learned to put up with her".
First and foremost I have to say that I am sad about Linda, Paul live is not fair I have been in the same place as you it's not fair but keep your chin up and have a good cry now and then get it all out you will have a chance to get over it for a little while and enjoy live music and memories for your prayers will be in the world
"There can't be another Beatles or a reunion because John is dead" - Funny how Paul had seemed to come to terms with this fact and yet the majority of the public haven't or didnt... and in his own words, John's death impacted him more than most people.
Yoko didn't break up the The Beatles, John did. He didn't much care about the band at that point because he was tired of it and he found a great love and relationship. He was also resentful of Paul calling the shots trying to keep the band together because John wasn't passionate about it anymore. What they did or said to each other is gossipy bullshit. The band was done at that point anyway. We were lucky they made it to Abbey Road. Abbey Road was a great last album for them and done properly with George Martin (Let it Be and Abbey Road were released in reverse from when they were recorded). Basically, leave Yoko alone. As John said about the break-up, "It's just a rock and roll band. You can go listen to the albums." (paraphrased).
Howard just baits Paul. Howard acts as if Paul has never answered these questions before so it makes Stern look like he thought them up all by himself. Howard must be so proud.
I always thought the fellas enjoyed any input from her, and the eye candy factor in the studio was a bonus, providing inspiration along with a calming effect when she napped over in the corner.
The big takeaway for me with the Beatles is a lesson we never seem to learn; that we weren't meant to be worshipped and made "gods" on any level, let alone the insane level the Beatles were elevated and thrust into. Lennon came out with the "love & peace" movement but here again, because they were all elevated into demigods, nobody could see the massive hypocrisy coming from a Beatle who hated everything about the band including his three dear buddies, at least for a long period of time while that movement was in its prime. And I'm not singling any of the Beatles out, nobody in all human history could live up to that status except Jesus Christ who was in fact, God and He was humble, He came for a specific purpose to be a servant as an example for us and of course to sacrifice Himself in a vicious, brutal execution in place of the truly guilty ones, US, so that whoever would simply accept it could be healed of the deadly disease called sin! Would any of us allow someone into our homes or communities who we knew had a deadly infectious disease? That would be outrageously stupid! Now, if we offered that infected person medical care and left it to them to decide whether to accept it or reject it, we would be able to let them in if they accepted the medical cure only. What would we think of an infected person knowing they would die, but that there is a cure and they reject the cure because they blame the doctor for the virus? We would think anyone taking such an outrageous position insane! And yet that is exactly what so many have chosen, and they will succumb to the deadly virus when they could easily simply accept the cure knowing they will be welcomed into the community where they could form bonds of friendship and create relationships, where they would be fed and given a warm safe home and all the benefits of a community of caring people. What would we think about a leader who allowed infected people into the community? We would be rightly outraged because that "leader" had given the entire community a death sentence! Jesus Christ will not allow anyone infected with sin into Heaven if they refuse His free cure, and thankfully so! Back to the point. As much as so many of us, including myself, I taught myself how to play guitar and sing because of Elvis and the Beatles! I used to worship them just as so many others have and still do sadly, but when I accepted Jesus Christ I understood none of us are worthy of worship except Him! I still enjoy the music, but after the Sean Combs wicked exposure where we're learning so many "movie stars" and "music entertainment stars" who so many worshipped and obsessively emulated, many sycophants defend them after learning what these monsters were doing to each other and to helpless victims many children! And the worst hasn't been revealed and it may not be revealed because I don't think we're ready for the level of sheer satanic depravity that many of the people so many worshipped believing they knew them based on their work and based on their public persona. First it was Epstein Island, and again, we haven't been told about the worst evil those filthy monsters were up to there either. I am NOT suggesting any of the Beatles were involved in that wicked evil. I am saying we do not know who the people so many of us worship or who feel they know as though these people were their own family are. We don't know what anyone, regular shmoes like you and I get up to behind closed doors. My warning is simple - parents need to stop letting TV - internet and cell phones raise our children! We need to teach our children not to worship anyone except Jesus Christ! We need to demand an immediate end to sexualizing our children in school and public! satan has owned this nation LONG ENOUGH! It's time for peace, love and prosperity for ALL of us! All you race baiters can take your grift elsewhere! Look how hypocritical these people are claiming all the white people and the "uncle tom" black folks who are also sick and tired of their grift, they claim we're full of hate and racism...just look at Whoopie Goldberg, Joy Bahr and the rest of those miserable race baiting hags, they are dripping with hate! The King of Kings, Lord of Lords must be the King of this nation again, He is the true source of love, peace and light, let's brings God back to our schools and kick out the pedo pushers!! They kicked God out of our Children's schools and look what we allowed them to replace it with!! ENOUGH! Jack ~'()'~
When John Lennon was shot and killed, my heart quite literally ached. I felt as if something were squeezing the happiness out of me. My depression persisted for several months. I'm still bummed about it, actually.
From watching the get back three DVD set Yoko Ono definitely looks like a fifth wheel in the studio. I don’t understand why she doesn’t realize that these are some of the best recording artist in history trying to create music and she just sitting there in the middle of it all.!
So....Paul was pissed about Yoko being in the studio an she shouldn't be there....then why was Linda (I think) there?? Theres probably 45 minutes of footage with Linda and Yoko sitting next to each other, conversing, laughing, snapping pictures.... But other than that I agree with him. The 4 of them were on edge with each other, pissy, bickering. They definitely needed a break, at least from each other and the contractual obligations they were used to having. I feel like Yoko inadvertently and unintentionally was the spark that finished things off for them.
I can't tell you the younger people I know that need to know "Live and let live" ... don't hold silly grudges. And call a good friend and make it right. If something happens to them, you will Never get over holding that grudge that you are likely half at fault for.
They could have done a "reunion" in the early 80's when Julian was having success and it would have been a big hit. But it's really cool they stuck to their guns and didn't.
I wouldn't be so quick to discount her "didn't know the Beatles" comment. In 2005 I was sitting in a park with close to Twickenham Stadium with my Japanese girlfriend when there came the sound of lots of cheering and music. "What's all that noise?" she asked. "Oh it sound like U2 are playing a concert" I said. She looked at me blankly... "What is U2?"
Obviously, from an outsiders point of view..I really can't think of one poingnent & meaningful 'artistic' creation that Yoko (by herself)..ever did ! I don't think many can. Whilst respecting John's love for her..I think she was a parasitic entity.
Without Johns death, im 99% certain a proper Beatles reunion wouldve happened and it wouldve blown the world away. "You can't reheat a Souffle" says Paul, I rebuttle with "The Beatles were more than a Souffle pal".
LIKE A SNOWFLAKE, EVERYONE HAS AN OPINION ABOUT J.L.'S DEATH, AND THE BREKUP OF THE BEATLES...SPECULATIVE PARANOIA.......MY READ IS THAT HE AND THEY WERE HERE ON THE SCENE EXACTY WHEN THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE!
24:05 the implicit agreement with the framing of this clip as being that Yoko Definitely interpreted “knocked off” to mean killed and there’s no chance she actually understood the interviewer was talking about the charts is so dishonest🙄🙄 Like there’s a difference between laughing mean-spiritedly at somebody you don’t like not doing well, and laughing because you think they’ve been killed. Especially when they literally show how the media did the exact same thing with the “it’s a drag” comment. Dishonest as hell
John Lennon is the one who broke up the Beatles because he was an insecure, weak person who just happened to have an amazing talent. As much as I love John’s music, the breakup was the best thing that could’ve ever happened for Paul.
I'm still trying to make sense of the best thing to say about this roller-coaster.Only John lennon knows how much yoko loved him, I have never heard abad word from her
Then you have never listened. She told John multiple times how he couldn’t sing. Why do you think he became a house husband? Look deeper! You really need to research the facts. I’ve been following the Beatles since the beginning.
@@nisar8009thank you. Reading the comment section, it seems like a lot of people don't know a thing about who Yoko really is and how she treated John and people around him (family, friends...). She was extremely controlling and manipulative to John. She willingly separated him from everyone and everything he loved, for years. Literally everyone around John disliked Yoko and people still think it's just irrational hate, which is pretty funny since that never happened with Cynthia or any other Beatle wife/gf. There's so much there to unpack I don't even know where to start. There's this fake depiction of Yoko being a totally inocent woman and a victim which is definitely not true. She's a really bad person and I don't say this lightly about anyone. I kinda get angry when people blindly defend her, like... Just listen to John's closest people's opinions. Cynthia, Julian, Paul, George, Ringo, George Martin, May Pang (her testimony is specially important)... and so many more. Even her auntie Mimi disliked her (which is no surprise honestly lmao).
@@michellemabelle5 Exactly! I can’t understand how everyone says she was so innocent. She was not at all. She beat down John’s confidence as well. And she did those albums that were freaking horrible, and I actually saw one guy praise them. What the literal hell? She couldn’t sing her way out of a paper bag! Anyone that says they like that is a liar and trying to sound like they understand abstract art when, they in fact, do not. The people that were into Yoko (her art when she met John) back in the day were mostly people that were regularly doing acid or heroin. She was an awful person.
John used Yoko to split the group. He was just a jealous guy. Paul certainly did take the reigns after Brian died, but John still wrote all the songs that mattered and changed the culture.
Click bate. Not rare. ALL of this has been or you tube before. In fact i’m not sure ifthe WHOLE video hasn’t been of youtube before. Probably compiled by A.I.
Mrs. John Lennon got way more from the Fabs than she should've. John had mommy issues, that benefited Yoko. She should've refused to insert herself into their recording life, whether John wanted that or not. I believe she also charged Julian for some of his Dad's memorabilia. Not sure where Paul's idea that she's a caring woman comes from - unless he meant she's caring when it comes to herself.
When I was a teen I always liked johns mysic and him as a member more. Then i learned more about them as individuals and listened to the others' music more. And I'd have to say John is my least favorite Beatle.
i think lennon got fed up with mccartney because he was taking control of the band he was always writing more songs than lennon and lennon could not keep up with him and yoko was a lot of surrport to him and doing stuff with her
Lennon got lazy. The Get Back film shows that he was not creative as he was on heroin and was subject to Yoko's scheming. As Ringo said: had McCartney not pushed the band they would have been finished after 3 albums.
After John met Yoko he was doing heroin and he lost his ability somewhat. He was angry that Paul was taking the reins, but it was his own fault. Then when the Alan Klein thing happened it just pushed everything over the edge. If Paul would have chosen someone other than his father in law to represent the band it might have been better, but that didn’t happen. Starting with St. Pepper, Paul was pushing his influence and it was working. I don’t think John liked it, but he didn’t step up.
@@garyhillman4993 OMG, I’ve been around since the 50’s. You had better do your homework. And the total B S about Paul’s death is just that…CRAP! I don’t know how anyone could actually believe that. How would they ever find an exact double that had the exact speaking voice, the same hair, the same build, the same height, that had the songwriting ability and could sing just like Paul McCartney? If you actually believe that, I have a bridge in Arizona to sell you that used to be in London. I’ll only charge a few million.
Paul is such a down to earth fellow, very understanding and compassionate.
He took care of Cynthia and Julian after John left them
@PatriciaReinhold-s5g how do you know that?
@@RiverDanube sorry it’s just I’m not a Beatles fan, never was in fact, my brother tourtured me as a kid with Beatles music, he wasn’t a musician , I was , but hey dude and let it be broke my heart, it’s all he listened to, 😂, while I was on learning stuff , on the likes of free, Rory Gallagher, Floyd , thin lizzy and so on, every time I wanted to learn stuff, the bloody record player would be banging out Beatles, it was tourture, specially having to hear him trying to sing along 😂😂😂
Never was a Beatles fan either. Never could work out what all the fuss was about.
Paul has way more patience with these repetitive questions year after year than most people would. He's always acknowledged that the extreme level of fame that came with the Beatles is decidedly a two-edged sword and that he had to go back through this over and over. At the end of the day they are four guys that grew up in that incredibly intense environment and, as adults, had to move on. There was plenty of magic in that particular combination of talents and I'm glad we got Abbey Road before they had to let it go.
My thoughts exactly. Enough. He admitted after Peter called him in while editing get back that none of those stories were what they became over the years.
Ringo said once when asked who were the Beatles? He answered " they were just four guys who really loved each other ".
And I find that comforting .
John and Paul really loved each other like brothers. I’m glad they made up before John’s death.
i think by 82 the Beatles would have made a record
@@williambault2469That is based on what, exactly?
@@scrambaba IF JOHN WOULD HAVE LIVED
@@williambault2469 Duh, assuming that he would have lived, what do you base that on?
@@williambault2469and wvy do you think that? John had stopped doing music and just did an album with Yoko.
Paul is such a nice guy! God bless him!
John, George and Ringo should have apologized to Paul because he tried to warn them about Allen Klein.
John said in an interview that Paul was right about Kline.
Yoko could have at least stayed in the control room... out of the way. She knew what she was doing and didn't care. Unfortunately John didn't care either.
true that bro
Paul used to say in the early 70s, I didn't leave the Beatles, The Beatles left The Beatles and no one wants to admit the party's over.
George walked out for the recording session and went to Liverpool for a few days. It was clear that the Beatles were near the end.
I AGREE WITH PAUL 100%.
What part?
Probably the 100% part @@suqmadic6672
Paul you feelings are correct. I'm on your side Paul
In the past 50 years, Paul McCartney has probably fielded more varied questions about John Lennon's career than his own.
for what john and yoko did to julian..shameful.
What did they do to him?
@@robinhannon3488 she wanted John to distance from Julian and make him buy his father’s things from auction
The Beatles gave us 100 years of amazing music in 7 years. Appreciate what we have. I always felt like all their amazing solo work would have just been Beatles songs. Feel glad for George to get all his music out. Arguably the best solo album out of them all after the breakup…
They all defo loved each other like brothers. I'm glad Paul and John were cool before John was passed. 🙏🏻👍🏻 I love the Beatles, even when they all went their own was,they were still brilliant.
There was a great article in Rolling Stone "Why the Beatles broke up" (Sept 3, 2009) that directed the breakup, I recommend reading it. Paul was constantly prolific, and his enthusiasm challenged Johns supremacy in the group. This led him to seek out a partnership outside the Beatles which allowed him to be the uncontested leader. Yoko provided John with this and introduced him to heroin. George greased the wheel of the breakup with his sour attitude . In the 'Get Back' movie, there is the scene where Paul and John are talking, after George had left the group, and Paul is reassuring John, telling him that he is the leader. That's just my read of the situation
A lot of what you say is likely true
Sorry I’ve never understood Jon and Yoko. John needed a mother figure.
The number one biggest thing that broke the Beatles up, by all accounts, was Allen Klein. Paul, George and Ringo put up with Yoko when she emerged, she wasn't as big a problem as it has been made out to be, really. But Allen Klein was the straw that broke the Beatles' back.
Nah it started on sept 11 1966 when Paul was done in
Klein certainly played a major role in the break up.
Of course Yoko was a big problem:
She schemed her way into the Beatles, opting for John after Paul rejected her.
She was in Cynthia's home cheating with her husband and never said a word when Cynthia turned up.
Her life was so empty she was in the studio all of the time interfering with their creative process. Paul, Ringo and George are on record as having hated it. John would have gone ballistic had any of the other wives been around all of the time. Their tolerance was extraordinary.
She sang like a squealing cat on recordings like Bungalow Bill.
She took John to NY, one of the most violent cities in the world where he was shot dead.
She has treated Julian like he's dirt.
She set Paul up to be busted in Japan.
She has claimed joint writing credit for Imagine.
Virtually everyone skips her tracks on Double Fantasy as they're unlistenable.
She arranged for John to have an affair with May Pang.
She's a sociopath who has done no good and been motivated at all times by personal gain.
It was because John wanted a change. He was tired of the same old thing. He met Yoko and she brought a new wild perspective to his life and he ran with it. You can tell by the freakish music they made of them yelling and recording it. It was total bs. He thought it was new age. John was so incredibly talented, but Yoko brought him down. They were both doing heroin and it was his undoing.
@@PaulFormentos He blew his mind out in a car.
He didn't notice that the lights had changed.
Excellent Excellent Video. A Beatles fan must watch for sure.
Very well done! Enjoyed watching!
Thank you! Cheers!
13:55 Paul said the last time he's spoken to John, John expressed not being all that interested in music anymore. Double Fantasy came out that year. Either John kept it from Paul, or it was a good stretch since they'd spoken. Either way is kind of sad.
Makes sense. John was veering off into more political territory toward the end of his life. Who knows; had he lived, he may have become a politician!
It reminds me of how Jim Morrison was fast losing interest in recording and performing music with The Doors at the tail end of his own tragically short life.
People are still totally in to the Beatles.
because that's quality music compared to the trash now days!
Imagine how tiring it is for them to still have to talk and answer about these things after so many years... come on, guys, turn the page, enjoy the music and art of them
I agree! But because there are so many different angles of thought on Paul’s, Ringo’s, and Rock and Roll historians’ parts regarding every moment of The Beatles’ existence, there will always be old-new insight to share and explore with the world. Plus, regarding John and Yoko specifically: the fact that December 8th marks the anniversary of his assassination always causes the topic of their relationship to boomerang back into the media spotlight.
Yoko certainly was a disturbance in the studio but the rest of the band got used it in hindsight even though John could have said that he was deeply in love with Yoko which probably would less awkward than what actually happened
They never got used to it, as Paul states in these clips. Read May Pang's book - John's marriage to Yoko was a scam. he planned to leave her many times but she trapped him. Even the album Double Fantasy gives the game away that it was all a scam fantasy.
@@hkpr-ro6uihow in double fantasy
There is a difference between genuine love and codependency.
Just simply brilliant; moving and touching. Thanks for compiling and uploading - liked and subscribed.
John was a first class jerk. His treatment of Julian was despicable.
🤔🙄
Stop, gets some help .
Do you have daddy issues too? Toughen up
It might be true, but I still love his songs.
It is absolutely true.
I remember reading an interview with George talking about how Yoko always smelled bad “like rotting fish” because of her poor hygiene from never showering.
wow I couldn't stand a woman with poor hygienia. I have read that John smelled bad too, they didn't take showers often
I never understood the breakup thing. If you're getting on each other's nerves or if you want to spend time with Bob Dylan and the band or do something different for a while take a break from each other. Take a year or two off. Why do you have to legally break up the band? I don't know, maybe my ignorance is showing.
One thing I didnt know about Yoko until recently which I think is an important insight into her character, is that she was actually upper-middle class in Japanese society. That is she had a sense of entitlement and self-importance; its actually a feature of people from that segment of society world-wide. So combine that with John's need for a mother figure, and his ongoing identity crises and angst, its easy to see that it was just the perfect storm. So Yoko just glommed on to him and rode his success for her own ego trip to be a famous and important artist. Otherwise she would have lived her whole life in obscurity (like the rest of us).
Total racist nonsense. Paul has said over and over, Yoko Ono did not break up the Beatles. You've just made up this nonsense about she "glommed" onto him.
@@patricias5122 OMG can we please stop labeling every critique about Yoko as 'racist' or 'sexist'? It literally has nothing to do with her being japanese or a woman, TF. I swear... Everytime someone makes an observation about Yoko it's always the same type of answer from her defenders. Such a stupid way of arguing. Everything the commenter said is true and is a well-known fact about Yoko. Also, the fact that Yoko wasn't the main reason Beatles broke up doesn't exclude her from any type of criticism. Yes, the Beatles could've broken up if Yoko was never there, but her presence made things worse 100%, and that's something fans don't appreciate for obvious reasons. She knew her presence there was making things worse but who cares, right? It's not her fault after all 🙄. She never cared about the Beatles, and that's a fact she herself admitted. She actually encouraged John (while still in the band) to start a new project with her. She totally is an entitled person who didn't care about anything but her own intentions. So yeah, was Yoko the main reason The Beatles broke up? No. So what? Does that excuse her from every responsability and consecuences of her actions? Also no. She's no saint and as Julian Lennon said about her: she knew what she was doing from day 1.
@@patricias5122 Would you say that any criticism of Yoko is racist?
John Lennon was a complicated man, but so it goes with a genius. People who knew him well held him in high esteem and spoke of his kindness and compassion. To call him a jerk, and never having known him, is nothing short of wretched arrogance.
NO WOMEN IN THE STUDIO WHILE THE GUYS ARE WORKING! NO EXCEPTIONS!
Right. The Beatles didn’t have a man cave to escape too back then! 😂
Or spouses in general. My husband and I don't follow each other to work. We support each other and if there is a work related function where significant others are invited we attend meet their colleagues.
While I agree, it’s a bit ironic Paul would say that while Linda was hanging out with the band taking photos of them at the time
@@JRAw89 Linda sits on the side when the Beatles are working on a song while yoko sits there in the group like a bump on a log! That's what is shown on the get back dvd's
Even George Harrison said that it was time for the group to take the next step forward never looked back Pete from the land down under
I thought of her as OhNo Yoko instead of Yoko Ono...
Isn't it about time to let go of this ridiculous hate of Yoko Ono?
@@patricias5122I know, right? It’s so old now.
@@patricias5122 It's not hate, it's more of a nauseous reaction, much like Chuck Berry's reaction to her caterwauling screaming during his performance one time. His expression says it all...
If Yoko was anything, she catalyzed an existing disenchantment in John vis a vis The Beatles.
If Yoko hadn't shown up, it would have been something else.
i can't fathom how at least anyone can come away with a good faith reading of the GET BACK doc with any other conclusion than this. the lady doesn't deserve the level of ire she gets (at least for this)
Lorne Michael's offer was $3000.00. I think SNL's standard fee for a live music act, at the time. Hilarious, as there'd recently been a promoter who floated $50 million for a single show (which would be filmed), which garnered press since in 1975 that was a ginormous sum.
I think Paul would make an effort get along with anyone. Even yoko
I think the only reason he made the effort to get along with her is money. Besides needing George's, then Olivia's, and Ringo's approval for any post Beatles projects, he needs Yoko's ok as well. And we're talking a lot of money. So better to have a reasonable relationship with her and rake in the dough, than hold a grudge and give up all that green.
It's in her best interest too. And if anyone wanted to make a dollar off of John's memory, it's Oh No.
All families have their feuds. It was all just part of the zeitgeist and similar things happened to other groups. The Supremes broke up in 1969, Janis Joplin died in 1970, Jim Morrison died in 1971,Jimi Hendrix died in 1970. The Rolling Stones didn't matter much after 1971 or 1972. It was all just meant to go that way.
That is true but obviously they were not a family, not brothers. They were some teenagers that made music together for 10 years, for fun and profit. After 1969 they never played together or were photographed together again. If that is a family, it’s a very bad family!
I really did not feel like crying today. Thanks....
I watched the Get Back film when it came out and there is this moment where Paul McCartney's wife Linda is shown with Yoko and they are talking back and forth just chatting.
All through that film you can see how they really were all close and the one moment when George Harrison walks out over a legit problem.
They all went to him and fixed that.
I never understood why John and Paul never made the other 2 equals. It never made sense to me that they just seemed to not see that this was pretty much the most largest thing.
I mean you can see GH just over it... and had decided to just be more assertive and demand songs of his be on albums, and you can sense that 2 people are working long hours to make Paul and John wealthy and when they came with music John and Paul just did not place that same energy.
I still love them... but I think Ringo and George should have been made equals.
However clearly Paul IMO was like the one who not only wrote his own stuff but saw many times a song that John was just starting Paul was able to arrange it and John needed Paul...
It just shows you that the media creates all this friction and even shows them reading the papers laughing at all the stuff written about them when there was no way that the media could know this since they were on film all day in the studio and anyone who believes anyone in the media or manipulates the media are suckers.
My interpretation of Get Back was that in many ways, Ringo was the leader of the band. When George walked, they said they could get Clapton in a second. When Ringo walked they really didn't know what to do.
No one is perfect. I’m glad Paul found some peace with their friendship. They both lived and respected each other, but I can see in the old photographs and video and in interviews to this day how much Paul admired and adored John. He always got the shit end of the stick in the press when he was definitely the only reason they ever made it. Paul was the one into the art seen and added all the sound effects on Tomorrow Never Knows while John was stoned all day. Don’t get me wrong. I probably listen to John a little more than Paul. His bratty anti behavior resonated with me when I was a kid. But if you look into the music you can see that Paul had plenty of music with just as much balls as John and I love his upbeat songs too. Paul pushed them to practice and record. John was apparently quite lazy when it came to recording, which is why I love him so much. The guy was limited in music theory and created some of the best work of all time. He didn’t have all 6!strings when he met Paul and played banjo chords. He went from zero knowledge to throwing away songs that are better than most musicians will ever create.
Anyway, that was my gay take. I love this band. They have been a constant in my life and they split 20 years before I was born. John had been dead for 8 years when I was born. They were special. All that talent in that band coming from the same English city is remarkable. I get excited when I catch something Beatlie in other artists songs. They’ll always be my number 1
Ono, NOT Oko!
It's so sad that Paul has to answer to this constantly to this day. This is a sad side of their legacy which I wish could fade to the background.
The Greatest Thing the Beatles ever Did was "Not Reunite". The Second was "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band"
End of an era ❤️
If they would have confronted John about loco Yoko, John would have left and there would not have been the Beatles.
The Beatles DID end shortly after Lennon met Ono.
Yoko was a bit of a sore, yes, but they learned to put up with her. The real break up came once Allen Klein came into the picture.
That's probably right, yes.🤷
@@felixmidas2020 Nonsense. John met Yoko in 1966. The Beatles ended in 1969.
@@scottudell7202 Paul states in the clips here that they hated her presence in the studio from when John met her in 1966 right up to 1969. Three years of, rightly, being sick of her is not "learned to put up with her".
He seems like a normal guy who just happens to have a boatload of talent
Spot on lol
First and foremost I have to say that I am sad about Linda, Paul live is not fair I have been in the same place as you it's not fair but keep your chin up and have a good cry now and then get it all out you will have a chance to get over it for a little while and enjoy live music and memories for your prayers will be in the world
"There can't be another Beatles or a reunion because John is dead" - Funny how Paul had seemed to come to terms with this fact and yet the majority of the public haven't or didnt... and in his own words, John's death impacted him more than most people.
Yoko didn't break up the The Beatles, John did. He didn't much care about the band at that point because he was tired of it and he found a great love and relationship. He was also resentful of Paul calling the shots trying to keep the band together because John wasn't passionate about it anymore. What they did or said to each other is gossipy bullshit. The band was done at that point anyway. We were lucky they made it to Abbey Road. Abbey Road was a great last album for them and done properly with George Martin (Let it Be and Abbey Road were released in reverse from when they were recorded). Basically, leave Yoko alone. As John said about the break-up, "It's just a rock and roll band. You can go listen to the albums." (paraphrased).
He was finished once Paul died late 66. Read Billy s book. Memoirs of Billy Shears. He never got over Paul’s death
Howard just baits Paul. Howard acts as if Paul has never answered these questions before so it makes Stern look like he thought them up all by himself. Howard must be so proud.
And don't forget that John loves to love he lost his own mum and his family was Paul McCartney it's only human to be confused
That was so long ago, i got i wisp of youth
I always thought the fellas enjoyed any input from her, and the eye candy factor in the studio was a bonus, providing inspiration along with a calming effect when she napped over in the corner.
LMFAOOOO not really.
Is this comment sarcastic? I hope it is...
The ending where he says "yes, we were friends"😪
Yoko is a crank
Love that Too Many People is Howard’s favourite McCartney track
Howard has probably never heard the song.
Yoko Ono as eye candy? I have never met the guy yet that fancied her, in fact she is much more attractive nowadays and she is 90 odd!
The big takeaway for me with the Beatles is a lesson we never seem to learn; that we weren't meant to be worshipped and made "gods" on any level, let alone the insane level the Beatles were elevated and thrust into.
Lennon came out with the "love & peace" movement but here again, because they were all elevated into demigods, nobody could see the massive hypocrisy coming from a Beatle who hated everything about the band including his three dear buddies, at least for a long period of time while that movement was in its prime.
And I'm not singling any of the Beatles out, nobody in all human history could live up to that status except Jesus Christ who was in fact, God and He was humble, He came for a specific purpose to be a servant as an example for us and of course to sacrifice Himself in a vicious, brutal execution in place of the truly guilty ones, US, so that whoever would simply accept it could be healed of the deadly disease called sin!
Would any of us allow someone into our homes or communities who we knew had a deadly infectious disease?
That would be outrageously stupid! Now, if we offered that infected person medical care and left it to them to decide whether to accept it or reject it, we would be able to let them in if they accepted the medical cure only.
What would we think of an infected person knowing they would die, but that there is a cure and they reject the cure because they blame the doctor for the virus? We would think anyone taking such an outrageous position insane!
And yet that is exactly what so many have chosen, and they will succumb to the deadly virus when they could easily simply accept the cure knowing they will be welcomed into the community where they could form bonds of friendship and create relationships, where they would be fed and given a warm safe home and all the benefits of a community of caring people.
What would we think about a leader who allowed infected people into the community? We would be rightly outraged because that "leader" had given the entire community a death sentence!
Jesus Christ will not allow anyone infected with sin into Heaven if they refuse His free cure, and thankfully so!
Back to the point. As much as so many of us, including myself, I taught myself how to play guitar and sing because of Elvis and the Beatles! I used to worship them just as so many others have and still do sadly, but when I accepted Jesus Christ I understood none of us are worthy of worship except Him!
I still enjoy the music, but after the Sean Combs wicked exposure where we're learning so many "movie stars" and "music entertainment stars" who so many worshipped and obsessively emulated, many sycophants defend them after learning what these monsters were doing to each other and to helpless victims many children! And the worst hasn't been revealed and it may not be revealed because I don't think we're ready for the level of sheer satanic depravity that many of the people so many worshipped believing they knew them based on their work and based on their public persona.
First it was Epstein Island, and again, we haven't been told about the worst evil those filthy monsters were up to there either.
I am NOT suggesting any of the Beatles were involved in that wicked evil. I am saying we do not know who the people so many of us worship or who feel they know as though these people were their own family are.
We don't know what anyone, regular shmoes like you and I get up to behind closed doors.
My warning is simple - parents need to stop letting TV - internet and cell phones raise our children!
We need to teach our children not to worship anyone except Jesus Christ!
We need to demand an immediate end to sexualizing our children in school and public!
satan has owned this nation LONG ENOUGH! It's time for peace, love and prosperity for ALL of us!
All you race baiters can take your grift elsewhere! Look how hypocritical these people are claiming all the white people and the "uncle tom" black folks who are also sick and tired of their grift, they claim we're full of hate and racism...just look at Whoopie Goldberg, Joy Bahr and the rest of those miserable race baiting hags, they are dripping with hate!
The King of Kings, Lord of Lords must be the King of this nation again, He is the true source of love, peace and light, let's brings God back to our schools and kick out the pedo pushers!!
They kicked God out of our Children's schools and look what we allowed them to replace it with!!
ENOUGH!
Jack ~'()'~
When Paul talks, I believe him, his words are considered, thoughful. Can’t say the same about John.. as great as he was.
When John Lennon was shot and killed, my heart quite literally ached. I felt as if something were squeezing the happiness out of me. My depression persisted for several months. I'm still bummed about it, actually.
9:58; ok, besides Yoko “writing with him”🙄
From watching the get back three DVD set Yoko Ono definitely looks like a fifth wheel in the studio. I don’t understand why she doesn’t realize that these are some of the best recording artist in history trying to create music and she just sitting there in the middle of it all.!
I feel that Paul is the Beatles. John was a creative person, and obviously co founded. I feel that Paul really is still the Beatles.
Well done.
So....Paul was pissed about Yoko being in the studio an she shouldn't be there....then why was Linda (I think) there?? Theres probably 45 minutes of footage with Linda and Yoko sitting next to each other, conversing, laughing, snapping pictures....
But other than that I agree with him. The 4 of them were on edge with each other, pissy, bickering. They definitely needed a break, at least from each other and the contractual obligations they were used to having. I feel like Yoko inadvertently and unintentionally was the spark that finished things off for them.
I can't tell you the younger people I know that need to know "Live and let live" ... don't hold silly grudges. And call a good friend and make it right. If something happens to them, you will Never get over holding that grudge that you are likely half at fault for.
''How do you sleep'' is not a spur of the moment thing. It took weeks of writing and recording.
John told ya this, when?
@@PaulFormentos If you knew anything about writing, recording and releasing then you might understand.
Paul McCartney On Yoko Oko, John Lennon and The Beatles Split
Who is Yoko Oko?
They could have done a "reunion" in the early 80's when Julian was having success and it would have been a big hit. But it's really cool they stuck to their guns and didn't.
who is yoko oko? dont you mean yono oko?
She set up meeting him 😢
3:30 proof the Beatles invented diss tracks
John used Yoko to break away from Yoko just wanted to be a Beatle. She hope they would let her scream on their songs
Well hello Faul.
I wouldn't be so quick to discount her "didn't know the Beatles" comment.
In 2005 I was sitting in a park with close to Twickenham Stadium with my Japanese girlfriend when there came the sound of lots of cheering and music.
"What's all that noise?" she asked. "Oh it sound like U2 are playing a concert" I said. She looked at me blankly... "What is U2?"
Obviously, from an outsiders point of view..I really can't think of one poingnent & meaningful 'artistic' creation that Yoko (by herself)..ever did ! I don't think many can.
Whilst respecting John's love for her..I think she was a parasitic entity.
Without Johns death, im 99% certain a proper Beatles reunion wouldve happened and it wouldve blown the world away. "You can't reheat a Souffle" says Paul, I rebuttle with "The Beatles were more than a Souffle pal".
Yoko was a disturbance. 🎉
Is there really anything else we don’t know about the Beatles at this point??
It was t necessarily her fault per say, but it wax Yoko that broke them up. Because John wanted to spend more time with her. Period
*"Yoko Oko" ?????... Are you sure ?...*
LIKE A SNOWFLAKE, EVERYONE HAS AN OPINION ABOUT J.L.'S DEATH, AND THE BREKUP OF THE BEATLES...SPECULATIVE PARANOIA.......MY READ IS THAT HE AND THEY WERE HERE ON THE SCENE EXACTY WHEN THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO BE!
Its sad that John gave up his
own son Julian for yoko. Im glad Paul was there for Julian.
24:05 the implicit agreement with the framing of this clip as being that Yoko Definitely interpreted “knocked off” to mean killed and there’s no chance she actually understood the interviewer was talking about the charts is so dishonest🙄🙄
Like there’s a difference between laughing mean-spiritedly at somebody you don’t like not doing well, and laughing because you think they’ve been killed. Especially when they literally show how the media did the exact same thing with the “it’s a drag” comment. Dishonest as hell
John Lennon is the one who broke up the Beatles because he was an insecure, weak person who just happened to have an amazing talent. As much as I love John’s music, the breakup was the best thing that could’ve ever happened for Paul.
I'm still trying to make sense of the best thing to say about this roller-coaster.Only John lennon knows how much yoko loved him, I have never heard abad word from her
Then you have never listened. She told John multiple times how he couldn’t sing. Why do you think he became a house husband? Look deeper! You really need to research the facts. I’ve been following the Beatles since the beginning.
@@nisar8009thank you. Reading the comment section, it seems like a lot of people don't know a thing about who Yoko really is and how she treated John and people around him (family, friends...). She was extremely controlling and manipulative to John. She willingly separated him from everyone and everything he loved, for years. Literally everyone around John disliked Yoko and people still think it's just irrational hate, which is pretty funny since that never happened with Cynthia or any other Beatle wife/gf. There's so much there to unpack I don't even know where to start. There's this fake depiction of Yoko being a totally inocent woman and a victim which is definitely not true. She's a really bad person and I don't say this lightly about anyone. I kinda get angry when people blindly defend her, like... Just listen to John's closest people's opinions. Cynthia, Julian, Paul, George, Ringo, George Martin, May Pang (her testimony is specially important)... and so many more. Even her auntie Mimi disliked her (which is no surprise honestly lmao).
@@michellemabelle5 Exactly! I can’t understand how everyone says she was so innocent. She was not at all. She beat down John’s confidence as well. And she did those albums that were freaking horrible, and I actually saw one guy praise them. What the literal hell? She couldn’t sing her way out of a paper bag! Anyone that says they like that is a liar and trying to sound like they understand abstract art when, they in fact, do not. The people that were into Yoko (her art when she met John) back in the day were mostly people that were regularly doing acid or heroin. She was an awful person.
John used Yoko to split the group. He was just a jealous guy. Paul certainly did take the reigns after Brian died, but John still wrote all the songs that mattered and changed the culture.
🤔🙄
25:46 Yoko looks beautiful here with make up on.
I love Paul
I always thought Yoko wrote Imagine.
Billy Shears
Feel for you in a way. What does true mean to you?
Howard stern made me cringe
Click bate. Not rare. ALL of this has been or you tube before. In fact i’m not sure ifthe WHOLE video hasn’t been of youtube before. Probably compiled by A.I.
Who’s Yoko Oko?
sometimes you must leave your fern .. othern times you will be left by your fern .. fern still will be fern
Mrs. John Lennon got way more from the Fabs than she should've. John had mommy issues, that benefited Yoko. She should've refused to insert herself into their recording life, whether John wanted that or not. I believe she also charged Julian for some of his Dad's memorabilia. Not sure where Paul's idea that she's a caring woman comes from - unless he meant she's caring when it comes to herself.
Yoko was the reason The Beatles broke up WHEN they did. She robbed the world of several more albums of music.
He can't speak freely until she passes.
When I was a teen I always liked johns mysic and him as a member more.
Then i learned more about them as individuals and listened to the others' music more. And I'd have to say John is my least favorite Beatle.
i think lennon got fed up with mccartney because he was taking control of the band he was always writing more songs than lennon and lennon could not keep up with him and yoko was a lot of surrport to him and doing stuff with her
Lennon got lazy. The Get Back film shows that he was not creative as he was on heroin and was subject to Yoko's scheming. As Ringo said: had McCartney not pushed the band they would have been finished after 3 albums.
After John met Yoko he was doing heroin and he lost his ability somewhat. He was angry that Paul was taking the reins, but it was his own fault. Then when the Alan Klein thing happened it just pushed everything over the edge. If Paul would have chosen someone other than his father in law to represent the band it might have been better, but that didn’t happen. Starting with St. Pepper, Paul was pushing his influence and it was working. I don’t think John liked it, but he didn’t step up.
@@nisar8009 true about Eastman. I can understand the 3 being concerned with Eastman. Klein and Eastman should have both been out of the running.
He was angry that Paul died full stop do your homework
@@garyhillman4993 OMG, I’ve been around since the 50’s. You had better do your homework. And the total B S about Paul’s death is just that…CRAP! I don’t know how anyone could actually believe that. How would they ever find an exact double that had the exact speaking voice, the same hair, the same build, the same height, that had the songwriting ability and could sing just like Paul McCartney? If you actually believe that, I have a bridge in Arizona to sell you that used to be in London. I’ll only charge a few million.
And unty Mime Julian, synthea to be honest I think that this guy is going through the blues
I think the Beatles did thier thing and quit while on top and moved on. It was ment to be.
Some groups stay together too long.