The ending was fantastic and so emotional I cried so sad that John had finally found peace and harmony which showed through his music and he was tragically murdered.
The early McCartney albums, McCartney and Ram, need a disclaimer. In the United States.Rolling Stone Magazine, was the standard bearer in rock journalism. Jan Werner, the head of the magazine, had a relationship with John. Werner put the stop to positive reviews of McCartney work. On the McCartney review he had the critic re-write his review and to “not” like it. Other magazines would follow Rolling Stones lead.
@@VanirTraditionalist in relation to mccartney, wenner certainly has been that but then you remember what the word prick actually covers-someone who who would murder john lennon due to their religious beliefs-and wenner seems like a ....cool dude.
I guess I'm not surprised that Ram didn't do well with critics. It's really it's own weird universe, and I'm sure wasn't what people were wanting / expecting to hear. However, to me it's the best album any of them put out after the breakup. It's just magical. Monkberry Moon Delight is probably my favorite track, so profoundly weird, yet joyous and just awesome. Only McCartney could have written and performed that. Great record.
Ram is not better then Plastic Ono Band, or Band On The Run...I think because it was unfairly treated upon release, the pendulum of reception has swung the other way where it's being treated as some great perfect album. I think it's also popular because so many people thrive on feeling like they're contrarians. When in reality, Ram has been widely respected since the 1990s, and its contrarian these days to NOT think its a masterpiece, Its a good album, better then McCartney 1, sure, better then Some Time In New York, sure, but better then Imagine, Plastic Ono Band, All Things Must Pass, I don't think so.
Easily the best album for me and wish he ignored the critics and carried on doing his eccentric only McCartney can do music. To me it's genius. Lennons only good album was plastic Ono band and that's mainly coz it's so raw and nothing like that had been done and all things must pass is obviously liked but I can't stand it, can't stand Georges voice and the production is horrible.
@@CartersRemasters Well, it’s subjective isn’t it? Those are all great records that you say are better, but there’s something charming about ram and the melodies, the harmonies, the sonic delight. I don’t think it’s an overcorrection. I think it is his masterpiece.
I am lucky to have watched George play guitar and hang out with him in 1990. I was amazed by his dexterity on the guitar and peaceful behaviour. Wings were the best so huge and massive in Australia ✌️ 🤘🎸🇦🇺
Good stuff, well worth a watch. When I think of the big, the huge hit songs of the 70s I don’t think of any by the ex Beatles apart from Imagine. They were massive in the 60s when together but as individuals they were just average and sometimes not even that.
What makes an impression on each of us as a "huge hit song" is subjective, but the fact is that by any measure Harrison's My Sweet Lord was one of the biggest hits of the decade, topping all UK sales in 1971, hitting #1 all over the world and winning multiple indusrtry awards for Single of the Year and the Ivor Novello for "Most Performed Work of the Year". Meanwhile, McCartney and Wings were in the very top tier of pop/rock acts of the 70s globally. In terms of #1 Billboard single success Wings were only just a whisker below the two all-conquering new-generation mega-acts of Elton John and the BeeGees, earning 5 Billboard #1s (Elton had 6) plus the biggest selling non-charity single of all time in the UK in 1978. Not so average, i think.
I prefer the Beatles as solo artists more than together. It really shows their individual merits. I think its easy to only love the glamor persona of them as a collective.
it's mostly because of the fact that john, under the influence of klein, did a ton of interviews at the time bashing paul and his time in the beatles, and paul remained relatively silent throughout it all. Also, Jan wenner, the co-founder of rolling stone magazine and huge influence on most rock journalism at the time, had a huge hard-on for paul and solely blamed him for the breakup of the beatles, so led the narrative that paul was the 'pop fluff' songwriter and that john was the 'true artist', and that influenced many journalists to lean negatively towards paul and favour the other three in attempts to gain favour with what was fast becoming the number one rock press source at the time. I'm sure allen klein factors in there somewhere, but I've not come across any concrete statements towards that opinion.
Interesting thing is that John and Paul looked each other`s work a lot. The overly simple "McCartney" clearly inspired the sparse production of "JL & POB", "Ram" clearly inspired the more corny production of "Imagine". "Wild Life" was somewhat Paul`s answer to "JL and POB", even more radical.
I agree. As far as I'm aware, it's the only group where every member released more than one hit in their solo careers. As well, they released great albums
Disagree . After All Things Must Pass, George's solo career went nowhere until he teamed up with Tom Petty later on . In fact he got into heavy drug usage during much of the 70s because of his lackluster solo career which caused him a lot of depression. Rumor also has it he was sort of jealous of Led Zeppelin's mega success during the 70s. Can't blame him, he was part of the biggest rock group in the world during the 60s, after all that fame for nearly a whole decade, It must have been a tough adjustment for him as a solo musician in the 70s.
Interesting little fact, the song 'Too Many People' starts with an extra message to John which Paul later admitted. When opening the song he actually sings 'P*ss Off' instead of 'Piece of'
Everybody has there Favorite Beatle. Comparing who's Better ? PAUL having 50 yrs Solo. John only 6 . George 20 yrs plus. Ringo is still going. I enjoy some of there Solo Work. My Top 10. 1. John Lennon POB. 2. George Harrison ATMP. 3. Paul McCartney RAM 4. John Lennon Imagine. 5. John Lennon WALLS and Bridges 6. Paul McCartney Band on the RUN. 7. George Harrison Living in the Material World. 8. Ringo Starr Ringo 9 Paul McCartney Flamimg Pie 10. George Harrison Brain Washed.
Paul’s post Beatles output copped unnecessary critical response, most were a lot better than given credit for, don’t know why they gave him such a rough run.
most music journalists, specially rolling stone magazine ones, hated Paul's post-beatles records. he was held responsible for breaking up the beatles... today these albums are seen as works of art (mccartney I and ram sure are).
😊❤ love these songs 😍 macortney and Beatles George Harrison and Paul McCartney love you Ringo much love 😚😘❤️ hahaha Jeni pugh love you 🤟 guys ❤️ Paul best friends celebrate 🥂❤.
It's amazing going through the music released It's not surprising the one who worked the hardest of the 4 made as much music as he did. Absolutely love the music he co-wrote with Ringo. It was something that connected my sister to myself before she passed away. Her goddamned husband didn't deserve her.
These solo beatles album are worth a listen George All things must pass Living in the Material world George harrison 33 1/3 Cloud nine Brainwashed John Plastic ono band Imagine Walls and Bridges (Skip the yoko tracks) Double fantasy - Milk and Honey Paul McCartney 1 Wild Life Ram Band on the run Venus and mars Wings at the speed of sound Back to the egg McCartney 2 Flowers in the dirt Flaming Pie Chaos and creation in the backyard Memory almost full McCartney 3 Ringo Ringo
McCartney 3 is ass. honestly anything after 1983 McCartney wise is so fucking bad. and George had a single good album. all things must pass. as for John. every album is amazing. fucking tragedy he's gone. they belonged together. and they would've reunited.
It's an old idea and many years ago done by a journalist here in the Netherlands. But feel free to copy it, because lots of solo albums were released since.
You guys should take a look at the work from Tragiclifeform / Alternate Universe Albums 347. He has done some cool concepts for albums that they released in an alternate timeline, and they consist of their solo work (and it's all still ongoing). As well, he has made additions to some songs, which makes them even better than they were before
They should have been cordial enough to each other to add vocal harmonies to certain solo tracks. No instruments and no arrangement suggestions -:much of the magic was the perfect harmonies.
I love Beatles music and they had a great chemistry but with the amount of fame and admiration they all received it was bound to creep in to their egos causing some problems that in the past might have been a minor thing now was something to blow up in their face. Ive never been famous but ive been in a family and had to deal with one. Its sad that family members can give you the most love but also be the ones to treat you the worst or vice versa.
I think they all reconnected before any deaths....it had to be a bad breakup. They were all under a major microscope and were very well known for the past decade. I still like almost all the music they made. I know these guys are human and not perfect. There is ans and was no such thing as bad publicity. All had very different styles, and thus, the mix was incredible.
John was acting very immature after the breakup and none of the bigwig critics called him on it. "How Do You Sleep" was penned in the aftermath of Paul McCartney's successful suit in the London High Court to dissolve the Beatles as a legal partnership. Didn't John want the breakup also? Maybe he did and the legal partnership is a separate question that the musical partnership, I don't know. However, I also think Paul employed his own immature antics. So it becomes the old "who STARTED it FIRST?" debate. ("Double redundancy" on purpose.) They both did. I think I blame John more for the breakup, which was possibly inevitable anyway, because John just forced the band to accept Yoko as a fifth Beatle. There are MANY who can be described as a "fifth Beatle" but she was definitely one at that point. He wanted her to have full say in musical and other decisions! And the studio atmosphere was radically changed just by her presence. The other three have all said so.
@@filmretrospective63 I'm to the point where if critics dislike something, I'm more inclined to go see it or listen to it! They just don't think like normal people. 😂
@@hw343434Paul had the most experimental, innovative, creative career out of the 4. While John was stuck writing rock and roll, blues, and pop, Paul was innovating
@@filmretrospective63 - well done FR - I'm 63 so I was a teenager in the 70s - my earliest Beatle memory was seeing Help in a Drive In Theatre in 1965 at a very tender age
When you think about it George had the advantage post breakup as had a load of unused songs. George seemed to make the transition better than the rest.
Ginger Baker never gets any credit for bringing Paul and wings to fucking Lagos. You could even see in the footage that he’s sitting right next to Paul.
These days all Paul's early albums get more critical respect. In the early 70s critics wanted what they thought of as relevant political and spiritual messages. Today critics tend to look at the entertainment value, and Paul's unfailing melodic sense and arrangement ability gets a lot more respect. Meanwhile some of John's political and even personal themes are viewed less favorably than at the time. At some point the pendulum will swing the other way.
When you write timeless songs like John did vs songs with no meaning at all like Paul did, the pendulum never fully swings no matter how much history revisionism Paul does
Youre wrong. Todays critics are too obsessed with political messaging not unlike back in the 1970s. Also, Lennon was more an angry edgelord whom whored out and did even more drugs than when he was with the Beatles.
@@hw343434Paul’s songs are more timeless. John’s songs are stuck in their time with bad production. Paul innovated and had much better production overall. It’s not revisionism that’s making people like Paul’s solo work more. That’s literally impossible. People just think Paul’s solo career is better on the average
Proof that everyone has their sell-by date. Brilliant together, but separate? And if they'd stayed together, they would've disappointed us. Band on the Run album was a bright star, as was Lennon's first two solo albums, and All Things Must Pass has its moments. But apart from that, I would say mediocre at best, though, the two singles from The Anthology were great and I have to say Now and Then did it for me. Just my opinion.
A clarification. McCartney's "Silly Love Songs" (a really stupid song) was written as a response to John Lennon saying something to the effect that he couldn't be bothered with writing and performing silly love songs - he had gone beyond that.
Funny how alcohol is only mentionned for John, Paul and George, while Ringo had a severe depression and turned to booze and drugs so badly he ended up in rehab.
This is very informative but mention should be made on the influence the fabulous Rutles had on the Beatles. Without Dirk, Nasty, Stig and Barry-the fabulous Rutles, there probably wouldnt have been the Beatles. We owe them so much. Check out the Rutles, straight away you'll see where the Beatles got their sound and style from. Just setting the record straight, so to speak.
The ending was fantastic and so emotional I cried so sad that John had finally found peace and harmony which showed through his music and he was tragically murdered.
Your videos are great. I’ve learned more about the Beatles these past few days watching your videos than I’ve ever known about them.
Ram was so far ahead of the time. The critics could not appreciate it.
The early McCartney albums, McCartney and Ram, need a disclaimer. In the United States.Rolling Stone Magazine, was the standard bearer in rock journalism. Jan Werner, the head of the magazine, had a relationship with John. Werner put the stop to positive reviews of McCartney work. On the McCartney review he had the critic re-write his review and to “not” like it. Other magazines would follow Rolling Stones lead.
Thanks for watching
Jann Wenner has been a prick from day one.
@@VanirTraditionalist in relation to mccartney, wenner certainly has been that but then you remember what the word prick actually covers-someone who who would murder john lennon due to their religious beliefs-and wenner seems like a ....cool dude.
Ram is the album I go to the most. I loved it then, I love it now.
Venus and Mars I still have on my rotation
I guess I'm not surprised that Ram didn't do well with critics. It's really it's own weird universe, and I'm sure wasn't what people were wanting / expecting to hear. However, to me it's the best album any of them put out after the breakup. It's just magical. Monkberry Moon Delight is probably my favorite track, so profoundly weird, yet joyous and just awesome. Only McCartney could have written and performed that. Great record.
Ram is not better then Plastic Ono Band, or Band On The Run...I think because it was unfairly treated upon release, the pendulum of reception has swung the other way where it's being treated as some great perfect album.
I think it's also popular because so many people thrive on feeling like they're contrarians. When in reality, Ram has been widely respected since the 1990s, and its contrarian these days to NOT think its a masterpiece,
Its a good album, better then McCartney 1, sure, better then Some Time In New York, sure, but better then Imagine, Plastic Ono Band, All Things Must Pass, I don't think so.
Easily the best album for me and wish he ignored the critics and carried on doing his eccentric only McCartney can do music. To me it's genius. Lennons only good album was plastic Ono band and that's mainly coz it's so raw and nothing like that had been done and all things must pass is obviously liked but I can't stand it, can't stand Georges voice and the production is horrible.
@@CartersRemasters Well, it’s subjective isn’t it? Those are all great records that you say are better, but there’s something charming about ram and the melodies, the harmonies, the sonic delight. I don’t think it’s an overcorrection. I think it is his masterpiece.
actually: paulie didn't write it! i hear him singing it malevolently, at joko. how vexing!
my wife and I love Ram and we sang 'Monkberry moon delight' at a karaoke bar and had a blast. Noone there had a clue what we were singing :)
You have such a captivating way of delivering information. Very entertaining and well researched. Another great video.
Glad you think so!
😆😆😆😆! Excellent !
All of the Beatles had a very successful solo careers
Remove the “very”. Lol nah overall they did create some classics
For different lengths of time.
George and Paul did
It's hard to pick a best solo Beatle. They were all so talented and good
I am lucky to have watched George play guitar and hang out with him in 1990. I was amazed by his dexterity on the guitar and peaceful behaviour. Wings were the best so huge and massive in Australia ✌️ 🤘🎸🇦🇺
Good stuff, well worth a watch. When I think of the big, the huge hit songs of the 70s I don’t think of any by the ex Beatles apart from Imagine. They were massive in the 60s when together but as individuals they were just average and sometimes not even that.
What makes an impression on each of us as a "huge hit song" is subjective, but the fact is that by any measure Harrison's My Sweet Lord was one of the biggest hits of the decade, topping all UK sales in 1971, hitting #1 all over the world and winning multiple indusrtry awards for Single of the Year and the Ivor Novello for "Most Performed Work of the Year". Meanwhile, McCartney and Wings were in the very top tier of pop/rock acts of the 70s globally. In terms of #1 Billboard single success Wings were only just a whisker below the two all-conquering new-generation mega-acts of Elton John and the BeeGees, earning 5 Billboard #1s (Elton had 6) plus the biggest selling non-charity single of all time in the UK in 1978. Not so average, i think.
I prefer the Beatles as solo artists more than together.
It really shows their individual merits.
I think its easy to only love the glamor persona of them as a collective.
George had the best selling album as a solo Beatle
Yes with 40+ musicians on a solo album!
Disagree respectfully.. Ram.. the best
And rightly so
George with Eric Clapton with Derek and the Dominoes.
🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Ram is definitely my favourite solo Beatles album, crazy to think it was disliked when it came out.
Most art that is later considered 'classic' is initially poorly received. The lesson is never to trust critics.
"Ram" is great!!!
it's mostly because of the fact that john, under the influence of klein, did a ton of interviews at the time bashing paul and his time in the beatles, and paul remained relatively silent throughout it all. Also, Jan wenner, the co-founder of rolling stone magazine and huge influence on most rock journalism at the time, had a huge hard-on for paul and solely blamed him for the breakup of the beatles, so led the narrative that paul was the 'pop fluff' songwriter and that john was the 'true artist', and that influenced many journalists to lean negatively towards paul and favour the other three in attempts to gain favour with what was fast becoming the number one rock press source at the time. I'm sure allen klein factors in there somewhere, but I've not come across any concrete statements towards that opinion.
“Ram” isn’t any better now than it was then.
Ram is great but it doesn’t really mean anything. Fun album to listen to, not better than Plastic Ono Band
My sweet lord is my favorite song IN HISTORY. Literally of all time
Mine is "He's So Fine"
Interesting thing is that John and Paul looked each other`s work a lot. The overly simple "McCartney" clearly inspired the sparse production of "JL & POB", "Ram" clearly inspired the more corny production of "Imagine". "Wild Life" was somewhat Paul`s answer to "JL and POB", even more radical.
Comparing McCartney to Plastic Ono Band is whack. Plastic Ono Band is in its own tier of solo Beatles albums
Wow, very comprehensive video! Thanks for sharing. 👏👏
The Beatles are the only band group that after their breakup had successful solo career
I agree. As far as I'm aware, it's the only group where every member released more than one hit in their solo careers. As well, they released great albums
Members of the Eagles did pretty well.
Oh really? Never knew that……
Ozzy and Townshend would beg to differ
Disagree . After All Things Must Pass, George's solo career went nowhere until he teamed up with Tom Petty later on . In fact he got into heavy drug usage during much of the 70s because of his lackluster solo career which caused him a lot of depression. Rumor also has it he was sort of jealous of Led Zeppelin's mega success during the 70s. Can't blame him, he was part of the biggest rock group in the world during the 60s, after all that fame for nearly a whole decade, It must have been a tough adjustment for him as a solo musician in the 70s.
Interesting little fact, the song 'Too Many People' starts with an extra message to John which Paul later admitted. When opening the song he actually sings 'P*ss Off' instead of 'Piece of'
Wonderful summary beautifully narrated
Thank you kindly!
Really enjoying your work!
Makes it all worth it!
Great video. Good job. Lennons comments on Paul and Ringo’s first albums is hilarious haha. Talk about speaking your mind. Love them all
Thanks!
That is the first time I’ve seen that Merseybeat album anywhere which I purchased when releases which I still have. Thanks for sharing that info.
No problem!
Hey, @filmretrospective5334: Love your sneering, Johnny Rottenesque voiceover. You from Holloway, too? Great work, as ever!
I think he sounds more like Joe Strummer
Everybody has there Favorite
Beatle.
Comparing who's Better ?
PAUL having 50 yrs Solo.
John only 6 .
George 20 yrs plus.
Ringo is still going.
I enjoy some of there Solo Work.
My Top 10.
1. John Lennon POB.
2. George Harrison ATMP.
3. Paul McCartney RAM
4. John Lennon Imagine.
5. John Lennon WALLS and Bridges
6. Paul McCartney Band on the RUN.
7. George Harrison Living in the Material World.
8. Ringo Starr Ringo
9 Paul McCartney Flamimg Pie
10. George Harrison Brain Washed.
Very well done.
Thank you kindly!
great video, many thnx!
Glad you liked it!
The solo beatle years are so under-rated
We love the Beatles and Paul McCartney you rock and roll forever and Hollywood walk of fame and the rock and roll hall of fame 1988: and 1999
“Plastic Ono Band” is the greatest solo Beatles album. All Things Must Pass, Imagine and Band on the Run/Ram come next
Plastic Ono Band those days was 50% of The Beatles too.
All Things Must Pass was the best on my opinion. It has so much lyrical content for all to enjoy
Paul’s post Beatles output copped unnecessary critical response, most were a lot better than given credit for, don’t know why they gave him such a rough run.
Great video,sir!
John's solo work all day long for me.
most music journalists, specially rolling stone magazine ones, hated Paul's post-beatles records. he was held responsible for breaking up the beatles... today these albums are seen as works of art (mccartney I and ram sure are).
Rotogravure is an excellent album, and the songs he wrote for Ringo the 4th are pretty good
😊❤ love these songs 😍 macortney and Beatles George Harrison and Paul McCartney love you Ringo much love 😚😘❤️ hahaha Jeni pugh love you 🤟 guys ❤️ Paul best friends celebrate 🥂❤.
I think the Beatles were haunted by the media comparisons of their former selves.
God bless the Beatles and Paul McCartney you rock and roll forever and Hollywood walk of fame and the rock and roll hall of fame 1988 and 1999
RAM is my favourite solo Beatles album it’s so good
George's song writing being undermined by John & Paul made him work harder. George's songs had more honesty and sincerity then his peers.
I agree with the first sentence but John was painfully honest.
But the the production of his albums are usually corny and lame.
It's amazing going through the music released It's not surprising the one who worked the hardest of the 4 made as much music as he did. Absolutely love the music he co-wrote with Ringo. It was something that connected my sister to myself before she passed away. Her goddamned husband didn't deserve her.
Another brilliant Beatles video, well done!
Many thanks! probably the making of please please me and around that time will be my next one. Ive already started wirting a script.
the album "ringo" should have been a much bigger affair if not for the fact that ringo managed the other three on what he wanted done.
Ringo had worked with all others (except Paul) too.
Harrison became increasingly whiny. Has a lot of frustrations built up because of his treatment from Lennon/McCartney.
Thanks for watching
Frustration, yes, but it is obvious he was not as good as Lennon & Mccartney
Atmp has aged badly and Harrison was not a very good singer.
I dig your channel my friend,good work.
Much appreciated
These solo beatles album are worth a listen
George
All things must pass
Living in the Material world
George harrison
33 1/3
Cloud nine
Brainwashed
John
Plastic ono band
Imagine
Walls and Bridges
(Skip the yoko tracks)
Double fantasy - Milk and Honey
Paul
McCartney 1
Wild Life
Ram
Band on the run
Venus and mars
Wings at the speed of sound
Back to the egg
McCartney 2
Flowers in the dirt
Flaming Pie
Chaos and creation in the backyard
Memory almost full
McCartney 3
Ringo
Ringo
I think 33 1/3, Venus and Mars, Tug of War, Flowers in the Dirt, and Ringo are worth listening too
Agreed, I forgot about those. I made this list without reference
Dark horse is great too
@@fabianugalde3789pipes of peace and off the ground too
McCartney 3 is ass. honestly anything after 1983 McCartney wise is so fucking bad. and George had a single good album. all things must pass. as for John. every album is amazing. fucking tragedy he's gone. they belonged together. and they would've reunited.
Just found this channel, great stuff. Have you ever made a fake album merging their solo records? I think it's always an interesting experiment
Thank you! no i never have
I am absolutely going to do this! What a cool idea!
It's an old idea and many years ago done by a journalist here in the Netherlands. But feel free to copy it, because lots of solo albums were released since.
I do it all the time 😂 normally end up with more Paul songs and only use songs up to 1980. There's ones on UA-cam called green album
You guys should take a look at the work from Tragiclifeform / Alternate Universe Albums 347. He has done some cool concepts for albums that they released in an alternate timeline, and they consist of their solo work (and it's all still ongoing). As well, he has made additions to some songs, which makes them even better than they were before
great commentary!
why did PID clues continue into the solo work?
Ringos songs are on the level of William shatner tbf.
They should have been cordial enough to each other to add vocal harmonies to certain solo tracks. No instruments and no arrangement suggestions -:much of the magic was the perfect harmonies.
Paul McCartney first three solo albums were very good but people hated Paul McCartney clouded an objective analysis
Pedants' corner: Ram was not recorded at Abbey Road, but in New York and Los Angeles.
I love Beatles music and they had a great chemistry but with the amount of fame and admiration they all received it was bound to creep in to their egos causing some problems that in the past might have been a minor thing now was something to blow up in their face. Ive never been famous but ive been in a family and had to deal with one. Its sad that family members can give you the most love but also be the ones to treat you the worst or vice versa.
They all had success and highs and lows .I think these guys had balls to move on.
I think they all reconnected before any deaths....it had to be a bad breakup. They were all under a major microscope and were very well known for the past decade. I still like almost all the music they made. I know these guys are human and not perfect. There is ans and was no such thing as bad publicity. All had very different styles, and thus, the mix was incredible.
Will there be a part 2 from 1980 to the present?
Maybe. right now I'm working on a doc about please please me and the beatles around that time
John was acting very immature after the breakup and none of the bigwig critics called him on it. "How Do You Sleep" was penned in the aftermath of Paul McCartney's successful suit in the London High Court to dissolve the Beatles as a legal partnership. Didn't John want the breakup also? Maybe he did and the legal partnership is a separate question that the musical partnership, I don't know.
However, I also think Paul employed his own immature antics. So it becomes the old "who STARTED it FIRST?" debate. ("Double redundancy" on purpose.) They both did. I think I blame John more for the breakup, which was possibly inevitable anyway, because John just forced the band to accept Yoko as a fifth Beatle. There are MANY who can be described as a "fifth Beatle" but she was definitely one at that point. He wanted her to have full say in musical and other decisions! And the studio atmosphere was radically changed just by her presence. The other three have all said so.
19:58 the 1988 spin-off to Thomas the Tank Engine & Friends titled "TUGS" referenced this
They changed music in a very short time , Beatles and Dylan what a great era.
That Ginger Baker @ 16.31 ? Ignore that , I carried on watching 😂Sorry .
🌠Very Interesting...
Glad you enjoyed it
What do critics know? Back to the Egg is a great album.
I agree. Never listen to critics.
@@filmretrospective63 I'm to the point where if critics dislike something, I'm more inclined to go see it or listen to it! They just don't think like normal people. 😂
The same for Londontown and it's my fave Macca album.... I can care less about album critics....BTW i love Back to the Egg also!
George is my favorite Beatle.
George had a the best post Beatles launch but Paul had the best post Beatles career.
John wrote the best song though. Imagine.
Paul had the most Velveeta Cheesy career of the 4 by FAR
@@ruskiny280 Maybe I'm Amazed clears Imagine.
@@hw343434Paul had the most experimental, innovative, creative career out of the 4. While John was stuck writing rock and roll, blues, and pop, Paul was innovating
@@ruskiny280 Communist manifesto
boy, ironically, you can make a drinking game whenever a person's drinking problem is brought up in this video. Tough times
Man Paul had some hairues in the 70s man lol
Dark Horse is an amazing album
I thought Lennon hearing Paul's single "Coming Up" insprired him to write songs again? This is the first I've heard abiout the yachting experience...
It was. JL said it was the best (solo?) song that PM had ever written.
@@belzski8110 Must admit I quite like listening to the song together with the official video.
John 6 year solo stuff was the best
nope
Easily
🤡
Sorry, when John met his father, who flew into a rage and threatened to kill whom ?? It’s not quite clear from the voiceover
John flew into a rage and threatened to kill his father.
@@filmretrospective63 TY v v much. Appreciated. And great great doc by the way. Just making my way through all your vids.
brilliant video FR - I grew up on this stuff
Thank you! me too. I always used to watch the beatles anthonology and beach boys documentaries growing up.
@@filmretrospective63 - well done FR - I'm 63 so I was a teenager in the 70s - my earliest Beatle memory was seeing Help in a Drive In Theatre in 1965 at a very tender age
When you think about it George had the advantage post breakup as had a load of unused songs. George seemed to make the transition better than the rest.
You.for.got.to.say.my.sweet.
Lord.that.was.number.one❤❤❤
Red Rose Speedway is a great album!!
"Paul, as it happened, agreed with him". Savage
Fck the critics and John for that matter. I LOVE McCartney 1 for all the reason they hated it.. same with Ram.. chiefs kiss to both. Great video man
Thank you. Always nice to hear people enjoying the videos
Fk McCartney, he treated George like shyte.
I used to drive around with this mixtape of solo Beatles songs...'70-'75. Still blasting it!!
Ginger Baker never gets any credit for bringing Paul and wings to fucking Lagos. You could even see in the footage that he’s sitting right next to Paul.
Baker was even more bitter than St. George
These days all Paul's early albums get more critical respect. In the early 70s critics wanted what they thought of as relevant political and spiritual messages. Today critics tend to look at the entertainment value, and Paul's unfailing melodic sense and arrangement ability gets a lot more respect. Meanwhile some of John's political and even personal themes are viewed less favorably than at the time. At some point the pendulum will swing the other way.
When you write timeless songs like John did vs songs with no meaning at all like Paul did, the pendulum never fully swings no matter how much history revisionism Paul does
@@hw343434what timeless songs ex john did?
Youre wrong. Todays critics are too obsessed with political messaging not unlike back in the 1970s. Also, Lennon was more an angry edgelord whom whored out and did even more drugs than when he was with the Beatles.
Sounds like nostalgic bias.
Everything is all about political messaging these days.
@@hw343434Paul’s songs are more timeless. John’s songs are stuck in their time with bad production. Paul innovated and had much better production overall. It’s not revisionism that’s making people like Paul’s solo work more. That’s literally impossible. People just think Paul’s solo career is better on the average
6:05 - 6:10
*KIDNAPPERS SEND GIRL HOME BY TAXI*
😂😂😂😂
This would be a screenshot for Reddit or 4chan.
so interesting that all 4 Beatles had so many dark periods... very dark.... seems like pain is a necessary ingredient for great art.
Dhany😁Hey🌟✨⭐🍊🖐🐯🌻
Band on the Run is McCartneys best album every song is perfect 👌🏻
Proof that everyone has their sell-by date. Brilliant together, but separate? And if they'd stayed together, they would've disappointed us. Band on the Run album was a bright star, as was Lennon's first two solo albums, and All Things Must Pass has its moments. But apart from that, I would say mediocre at best, though, the two singles from The Anthology were great and I have to say Now and Then did it for me. Just my opinion.
George Harrison is the most musically lyrically and successful when they broke up
Yeah, cause Paul is dead 😅😅
ATMP was just amazing, wish Danni would remix it without the Spector production.
Great material, but Paul's material got constant airplay in the 70s. My Sweet Lord was a huge hit in 1971.
Not successful, john lennon had hit after hit after hit
And made imagine which was bigger than any of the others solos career
Think you had better fact check because you are way off!
John Lennon had only 6 years as a solo artist and he has the most iconic solo Beatles songs of all starting with “Instant Karma”. Imagine that
Band on the run by Paul., women by john n my sweet lord while my guitar n something is rhe best ever
Who are these critics what qualifies them to sling shit at the world's greatest bands.
Hell yah 🔥🤣
A clarification. McCartney's "Silly Love Songs" (a really stupid song) was written as a response to John Lennon saying something to the effect that he couldn't be bothered with writing and performing silly love songs - he had gone beyond that.
How Do You Sleep at Night, how disgusting. Poor Paul.
Funny how alcohol is only mentionned for John, Paul and George, while Ringo had a severe depression and turned to booze and drugs so badly he ended up in rehab.
Linda was so pretty!
Yes, she was. I met them both as Paul’s cousin was my boyfriend.
@@jeanmyers1787 You can tell us, is it really still original Paul?
This is very informative but mention should be made on the influence the fabulous Rutles had on the Beatles. Without Dirk, Nasty, Stig and Barry-the fabulous Rutles, there probably wouldnt have been the Beatles. We owe them so much. Check out the Rutles, straight away you'll see where the Beatles got their sound and style from.
Just setting the record straight, so to speak.
The Rutles far surpassed the beatles.
@@filmretrospective63The legends that will last a lunchtime
all the beatles songs were a diary
1. Ram - Paul
2. Ono Band - John
3. Band on the Run - Paul
4. ATMP - George
5. Imagine - John
Thanks for watching
"Wild Life" is really awful! 😂 So as "Sometime In NYC" 😂
Thanks for watching
Bip Bop don't move ya?
Gonna start calling plastic ono band, Sgt lennon
Well, there’ll be no suggestion you were a fan of the majority of their solo work..🤨
You're generally good with your facts. But it wasn't Jane who encouraged Paul to buy the place in Scotland. It was his tax accountant