Gripen E vs F16V vs Gripen C: Alin ang mas Malakas?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
- JAS 39 Gripen E, ang eroplanong kayang makipagsabayan sa stealth fighter jet na SU-57 ng Russia. Pero ano nga ba ang meron sa eroplanong ito? Ano naman ang pinagkaiba at pagkakapareho nito sa Gripen C at F16V na nagustuhan ng Pilipinas? Tingnan natin sa video na ito.
Music:
tunetank.com/t...
Ito naman po ang video tungkol sa KF-21 ng South Korea.
ua-cam.com/video/7PfdUGSYMwo/v-deo.html
Ito naman po ang video tungkol sa F16V.
ua-cam.com/video/r1PEhLb2yDA/v-deo.html
No offene but your a absolute Dumbass Clickbaiters.
Will you correct your Video dude?
The SAAB offer is not the E Variant bro, The E variant is cost more than the F-35A per unit keep that in mind, The SAAB offer was a JAS-39C Variant cheaper than F-16 Block 70 or Block 52, this plane use Pulse Dapler Radar PS-05 Mk4 or can be upgraded to gAn AESA Radar but add more cost, Cobra HMD under the MS20 Standard but no IRST.
The engine is a SAAB version of GE F414 engine which is domestically licence build.
The C variant is also can equipe with its either MBDA long ranged Meteor Air to Air Missile, a Raytheon Phytone Air to air missile or a American AIM 120D AMRAM and AIM 9X Sidewinder.
Remove this video now and make another one!!!!!
Mas malalayo ang range ng radar ng mga fighter ng us kaya natatarget agad nila ang kalaban na hindi pa nila alam.... Tulad ng f15E dipa natalo sa dogfight
Womp womp
Grabe lahat ng info nandito na kuya ko ay isang Phil. Air Force and na amaze din siya dito. Thank you Sir at sa team mo po, more vids to come pa✨🤘👏
Gripen is my choice for the MRF acquisition due to low operating costs, ease of maintenance, and integration of Meteor and IRIS T air to air missiles.
that's right- fighter jet with blind sight loss the fight - unlike gripen c/d had a semi stealth tech that can blind enemies radar- their sight. Go for the Gripen C/D & E/F.
Gripping E for the Philippines
D naman inoffer sa pinas yan.
The proposed upgraded C version will be more than enough. It´s way better than any F16, F18, and Chinese or Russian fighter.
@@Shammie19 fyi they renew the offer, from c/d to e/f
Kung sa high end radar, high tech avionics, full weapons loadout without limited space to carry external fuel tank, at sophisticated ang sensor.
1. Viper blk 70/72
2. Gripen E
Kung old model, hindi masyado high tech ang avionics, limited weapons loadout, range at hindi Aesa radar.
3. Gripen C/D model.
For me, i will go F-16 since similar naman ito sa FA-50 interms of transition phase hindi na masyado complicated since same sila lahat from design to inside the cockpit itself.
Isa pa some of the countries like china are having 5th gen fighters. Dapat meron tayong dedicated 4.5+ fighter jet with 5th gen radar, avionics and sensor to counter those 5th gen fighters to defend our airspace. And for me they deserve those big toys for their organization no matter how expensive.
Yung problema lang ay price at minsan sobrang OA yung US.
Tsaka ang tamad ng US gumawa ng produkto.
Yung Gripen E medyo may problema din dahil hindi pa siya in full production pa at select production pa siya meaning hindi pa gaano karami yung pwede i-manufacture nila.
Kung may pera tayo, mas maganda pa yung Rafale in capabilities at sa armament.
@@dickmelsonlupot7697 theres nothing if they price of viper is expensive why?? Sympre naka full package lahat everything nandoon yong needs ng pilot and the aircraft itself. Hindi yan oa. And do you have any proof yun sinabi mong tamad mag gawa ng produkto? Hindi yan basta madali gawin yung mga military equipment dahil binusisi nila yung at quality is ther main priority not quantity.
If you want high capability why not F-15EX or F/A-18 Super Hornet.
@@ruphyflorencioii5069
I'm not referring to manufacturing yung "OA", but politics in Washington whether it's their Senate or Congress where a lot of foreign items need to pass through minsan matagal ma-accept bago gagawin.
Whereas the other countries hindi na need.
As for proof, just look at what they told the PAF and why the choice is still in Limbo and much of the "signs" going for the Gripen since the F-16V has a backlog of orders and where our "order" was told to be available due to reasons like COVID, shortage of manufacturing parts and the issue of where parts are made dahil maraming politics madadaanan yung manufacturing ng fighter jets nila. Just look at the problem with the F-35 where a lot of Senators have forced manufacturing to be decentralized and have them made in different areas that levy taxes and other costs onto manufacturers just to get approval from Congress.
Plus Lockheed is already known for it's bad reputation of delays. Not even Boeing is safe from this like how their Dreamliners were delayed for quite some due to multiple reasons. Or just research about the delays and problems the F-35 had to go through.
And yes, I do know it takes time to manufacture planes especially since I'm an aircraft mechanic myself. But in comparison to what the other manufacturers can do, the delays the American manufacturers have is very detrimental to any acquisition especially if the need to have them is urgent.
Or when compared to the Gripen C/D where although somewhat "inferior" compared to the Viper, it is quicker to manufacture and easier to get asides from being cheap mainly because the facilities to make them are already there and streamlined and that politics aren't blocking it's manufacture.
And no, the F-15EX is not easy to get either.
It's just as marred with political BS with American politicians as any other American purchase.
Plus it hasn't even been proven as a proper F-15 variant yet and is more like still an experiment at this point.
And when compared to other 4.5s or 4th gen fighters, it has some limits to it where the Rafale although more expensive than the F15EX, has more capabilities than the F15EX.
Hell, even the USAF only bought them to supplement their old F15s and because they can no longer have F-22s and their F-35 are delayed.
And no other country even has the F-15EX.
Even the older gen F-15s weren't just given to anyone.
The Saudi & Qatari F-15s are all inferior even compared to the base F-15s while the Israeli, Singaporean and South Korean F-15s are pretty much just rebadged F-15s where it's also inferior to the base F-15s but with added modifications to suit their needs.
The Rafale is different since unlike Lockheed or any American company, Dassault does offer technology transfers although they haven't done it yet for the Rafale, they are planning to and are still in the process of doing so much like what they did with their other aircrafts.
I think baliktad ka about sa Fa50 ung Gripen ung mas madaling transition kaysa sa F16V kaso combat proven ung frame ng F16 but needs more training . Kaysa sa Gripen nalang
@@dickmelsonlupot7697 that's right.
pwede nmn po pag tsagaan ang Gripen C/D variant na may modular tech. mas lower operation/flight hour cost ..pwede din i upgrade ng AESA radar ang Gripen C/D decclasified din ang Electronic jammin system kaya nakatago tlga ang lakas ng gripen.. hindi din nila napapag basehan ung result ng Red Flag exercise ng US & NATO air force drill last 2015. na isa ang Gripen sa nagpahirap sa F-15E, F-16 Viper & Euro Fighter Typhoon. Kaya Tama ang former PRDD na gripen and dapat kunin kc upgradable, more flexible and more battle ready compare to US 4++ fighter jet.
Hands down! one of the best visual presentation i hve ever seen! very detailed, unique & on point side by side comparison.. i'm now a huge fan! keep on making this kind of content w/ goddamn quality! btw, my money is still on the Viper..
Viper doesn't heave blinding on board electronic jamming system which Gripen C/D have. keep that in mind that SU fighter Jet & Mig Fighter have AESA radar but dosent have a powerfull electronc jaming system that Gripen posses. that's their weakness
U7⁷⁷⁷
34
At Red Flag 2006, 1 Gripen C knocked out 5 F16s alone! Hello, are you awake? I too admire F16 for its history. But now...no. Gripen always defeats F16 with humiliating numbers every time.
@@donquixote1502 you must review the results of 2013 Red Flag exercise, it is know to the world that US is still hiding the outcome of the 2013 US & NATO RED FLAG EXERCISE. It seem you are na it aware of that past event being held at Nevada Dessert US. With the score of 3-0 & 3-1 against US 4th gen fighter including F-16&F-15. Your one of the fans of US military that is still under rating the true digital strength of Gripen C/D.
dati mas bilib ako sa f16 pero dahil sa video na to! mas naintindihan ko, at naconsider ko na si gripen e, thankyou, ganda ng video
Gripen C/D is a good choise for PAF, and I hope the PAF and the Philippine Covernment would also have another set of squadrons for Jas 39 Gripen E and Rafale. Understanding the load difference between a medium class / swing role (ability to switch from A2G missions, to A2A missions, without the need to re-arm) Gripen E and a light class / multi role (ability to perform A2G or A2A missions, after re-arming) Gripen C in CAP or CAS missions.
Sana Gripen E/F na ang kunin. Ubos na kasi yung C/D version na ibinenta na 4 sa Hungary & 10 sa Ukraine. Wag na yung F16V. Mababa ang specs pero ang mahal naman ng operational & maintenance cost. Di kagaya ng Gripen E na mas advance ang avionics & electronic warfare suit niya. Mahal nga lang ang presyo pero sobrang mura naman ng operational & maintenance cost. & Mukhang kaya ng Pinas na kumuha ng 48 units as per required ng PAF. Napirmahan na naman yung $36 billion na budget for 10 years para sa horizon 3 modernization program... Magkakatotoo nga din talaga na magkakaroon na rin tayo ng mga submarines... Yes! 👍👍👍💪💪💪
excellents god bless philippines-sweden continues to modernized more the arm forces .........PH........god be with us all good luck to all.........god speed us all.............
Sana makuha natin lahat ang mga ito dahil bilang archipelagic country na binubuo ng 7,641 mga grupo ng mga isla ay kailangan natin ng aerial military assets na may sapat na dami. Nice video vlog idol thank you and more power saung channel 👍👍
Imagine PAF operates,
- JAS 39 Gripen E for single-engine MRF
- KF-21 for twin-engine MRF
- Commonality of F414GE engines and weapons esp Meteor missiles
- Easier maintenance and logistics
- Lower operating cost
This MRF tandem would be a nightmare for PLAAF fighter aircraft.
Thanks Literacy Corner for making this great content and your hard work. You are a genius!
Kalimutan mu na Ang gripen jas39 E dahil mura lng yan kinti sa f35 masmahal sa f16v
@@kimjunsalcedo8720 It's just a wishful thinking. I am aware Gripen E is not offered to PAF. They should get the F-16 Viper.
Hey! Thank you for the kind words, sir. hehe
KF-21 on paper is on par with Gripen E or even better. Under tesing pa nga lang ang KF-21.
@@LiteracyCorner Anytime sir. Thanks for always providing a very informative and entertaining content. The details are stunning. Hoping you reached 100K subs before the year ends.
good job sir bro.. gnda ng pliwanag at mdaling intindihin kung anu dpat piliin ng AFP ntin particularly the PAF.. thanks for granting ng request ng karamihan ng review ng MRF.. kung maari sna mg karon k din ng review ng FA 50 na meron ang PAF at ang upgraded version nya ikumpara sa mga kparehas ng class na offer ng ibang bansa.. slamat ng marami. god bless you and more power to your channel
Sana ganito lahat ng UA-camr 😁
Keep it up sa napakagandang Content idol ❤️
I hope they take into consideration the factors such as how similar those MRF into our trainer aircraft (FA-50) aanhin mo yang magandang eroplano kung di gamay ng mga piloto, oo they could undergo sa mga training pero it will cost us a lot at magiging walang silbi yung pagbili sa mga FA-50, we are far behind in air assets at technology kaya this MRF acquisition is a big leap for our country.
Similar capabilities but not on the same scale. The reason the fa50s where bought was for our pilots to be ready in using modern aircraft. That is why they are designated as LIFT
Training and familiarization are always considered when acquiring new equipment dunno why are you complaining about the cost for it.
Parehas na maganda. Parehas na may advantage at disadvantage.
Advantage ng F16 is Mas malapit siya sa FA 50. Hindi masyadong mahihirapan ang pilot natin sa transition.
Advantage ng Gripen is low maintenance at Mas cost effective. Kahit saan pwede gawing runway kahit sa highway lang. Mas mabilis din I ready at mag reload
Free maintenance ng f16 at spare parts pa yan ung offer ng us
@@hahahahhahahah9688 kasama sa package yung spare parts at maintenance. Kasama siya sa babayaran.
Yung Gripen, 12+2 meaning may free na dalawa
Mas mura ang flight cost ng Gripen. Less flight cost = more training hours. Mas capable din sa electronic warfare. Sa F-16 naman, mas mahal ang flight cost Pero less training na kasi may FA50 na tayo, mas maraming hard points kaya mas maraming weapon payload (1 hard point difference) Yun nga lang puro US weapons lang ang pwedeng maging munitions, sa Gripen pwedeng pwede ang US missiles at ang NATO missiles ang maging weapon payload choice kaya mas versatile ang Gripen pero mas lamang ang f-16 ng Isang hard point. Ang masasabi ko lang ay aanihin mo ba ang weapon payload kung blinded naman? Mas pabor talaga ang Gripen kasi may future upgrades pa yan at magiging mas mura pa. For sure maraming gusto sa f-16 Pero without digital warfare na on board yung Gripen E talaga ang mas sulit kasi bibilhin pa ang Viper shield kung sakali ang f-16 ang mapipili at ang tagal pa nyan bago ma upgrade kasi sobrang maselan ang politics ng US pagdating sa technology transfer. Besides parehas lang ang unit cost ng f-16 Viper at ng Gripen E/F.
@@emanantonov nakuha mo sir lahat Ng Punto.
@@johnallenvillones7322 Ewan ko nalang kung F-16 ang kukunin kasi mapapamahal talaga tayo jan. Nakatago kasi ang lakas ng JAS Gripen E tapos mas maganda pa ang tutok sa missiles na hindi kayang gawin ng radar ng F-16. Kung sa dogfight situation yan talo na F-16 jan lalo na parang ginagawang gyroscopic ang targeting system ng JAS Gripen kasi halimbawa sa sharp turns tas kung kailangan tumira maeexecute ng Gripen ng maayos. Mahirap na kalaban ang Gripen kasi napatunayan na talaga yan sa dogfighting although sa military exercise lang naman Tas limited sa rules of engagement Pero ganun pa man malakas na talaga yan Pero may ilalakas pa kaya ms maganda kung eto yung bilhin
Nice explanation sir everything we know is in you
galing ng explanation..okey...kahit alin dyan..bagay sa PAF..mahuhusay ang pilotong pinoy..👍🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
For me maganda ang gripen E better siya sa mga Low budget air force tulad ng Pilipinas.Ang pinaguusapan kase dito is interoperability ehh kung F 16 ang pipiliin natin masasanay o matetrain ang ating pilots sa paggamit ng Mga Us made Jets.For example Sakali man magkagyera tayu sa China madali nalang tayu mabibigyan ng F 16 ng US dahil marunong ng magpalipad ang mga Piloto natin.
That's why I like the F-16 more than the JAS-39 Gripen. In the event of a worldwide conflict. It's hard to get aircraft parts from Sweden. On the other hand, it makes the PAF have some easy grab on the other F-16s if our pilots already knew how to operate it early, making us able to request for more planes of the same model if we're to ask the US for additional planes in case of conflict. We better learn the lessons of the Russo-Ukrainian conflict by acquiring the better aircraft that have interoperability with other nations. That way, the allies can lend us a hand on that matter
Sa avionics, jamming system may slight advantage ang Gripen E sa F-16 viper. Overall, F-16 pa rin siyempre. Yan ay pag nasa daydreaming mode tayo. 😅 MAHAL yang dalawang top models. At lalung sobrang mahal ng flight hours/maintenance cost ng F-16. Maselan lagi pag U.S. made, parang beauty queen ang maintenance. Superior performance = at a cost siyempre. MAYROON bang sustained na pondo ang PH? Realistic lang. Take the case of acquiring Turkey's T129 instead of Apaches, 6 against 2. Ayun mission capable na kaagad. Kung mangangarap na rin lang, eh de lubosin na: F-15"PH". Na kailan man hindi mangyayari dahil sa lahat na lang yata ng BFF ng U.S. ang PH ang laging bulok ang ibinibigay na armas. Gustuhin man natin Viper at Gripen E, realistically, kumuha na muna ng Gripen C/D version (rugged/lower maintenance cost) at nang makapagsimula na ng MAS maaga at MAS maraming piloto na ma-expose sa training/mission. The last time I checked WALANG pera ang PH pero MAYROON itong needs sa depensa. Reality check lang po.
paanong hndi bulok eh gahol sa pondo. Tagal na yang plano na mrf until now urong sulong kung ano ba tlga pipiliin. ipinasok pa ang tejas sa pag pipilian pero tinanggal din, balik ulit sa gripen at f16, balang araw sa kakapili nila mapunta nalang yan sa saranggola/tabanog.
Basta ako Euro typon made in Germany at Britain tiwala ako doon
@@natanielbonotan5344 mas mahal ata ang eurotyphoon pag non european
211 Machete na lang poh 😂😂😂😂
Bakit ang Pakistan na mas mahirap pa SA pinas at masadaming utang keysa atin Kaya bumili mag maintain Ng napakaraming jet fighters tulad Ng F16
My choice is Grifen E . Sana magkaroon tayo agad nito dahil s nagbabadyang kaguluhan. Dapat handa na tayo dahil napakahina pa ang ating AFP s ngayon. Very informative ang vlog n ito.
Mas expensive gripen E kesa f16v kaya gripen c/d ang offer ng sweden.
Grabee galing mo talaga sa animation idol sobrang sulit yung pag hihintay at panonood ng mga viewers mo ☺️🙏🙏🙏
Good job! well reseached!
Ang galing mo naman. 👍👍 Kahit alin sa dalawa basta magkaroon ng totoong MRF ang PAF.
Watching it right now, 5 months after the vid was made and the Philippines already decide they choose The gripen c/d variant
Waiting to watch this one..
Thank you for waiting. :)
Good choice for the Philippines to acquire the Gripen. Even though the F-16 is considered a monster of dogfighting & excellent multi-role Gen4 aircraft. The Gripen is considered one of the best Gen4.5 in the world. To be honest, the only aircraft that the Gripen would have a hard time fighting are technically allied aircraft.
Philippines has really done a good job of selecting high quality systems for its modernization program. Combat UAVs would be nice as the next step.
Di naman gripen E ang inooffer. Gripen c/d yun.
@Kim Rechelle wala ng dogfights na nangyayari ngayon kaya ang priority na ng fighter jets ay radar, electronic warfare capabilities, long range missiles atbp.
@Kim Rechelle lol mas malakas sa bvr ang f-22 dahil sa stealth capabilities pinagsasabi mo
@Kim Rechelle saka parang mas vunerable ang f-22 sa dogfights tignan mo yung mga mock up fights ng f-22 sa ibang mga european jets may mga time na natatalo din ang f-22 kasi di naman yun pang dogfight eh kaya nga may stealth para di makita sa radar sa malayuan walang silbi yung stealth nya pag malapitan na
@@vorpalsword8165 We really don't need an E-model, it's internal components, both hard and software are akin to a level of the F-35.
The C variant is the NATO standard, it comes with what we need at a price we can afford.
It's the same reason the F22 was procured instead of the YF23, while the 23 outperformed the 22, the 22 was instead taken by the USAF as it still met their requirements while costing less.
Very educational explanation idol
I go for JAS 39 Gripen due to low flight and maintainance cost. F 16 cost 12k$ per flight hour is to expensive to use. Unless, we only fly them occasionally and will use them for display purposes only.😂😂
Ano ba difference sa price between Gripen C & E ? Thanks.
You need more young Filipino pilots!
US offer brand new 12 f16v additional 2 f16 block 52 two seater and 2 f16 block 52 single seater Bali 16 aircraft 2 year dadating ang 4 use f16 pagnapermahan na habang ang Saab offer ay 14 brand new gripen jas39 MS20 3 to 4 year dadating Wala offer ang jas39 E
napaka ganda ng presentation nyo congrats, dapat ganyan lagi napaka informative.
ung mga naghahangad sa F-16 Viper, tingnan po muna ntn ang nagign result ng US-NATO Red Flag military exercise, duon napagalaman na hindi basta basta ang lakas ng Gripen C/D kontra sa ibang 4++ gen fighter, nag nakikita lng kc ng mga F-16 Viper enthusiast eh ung AESA Radar at greater payload, pero hindi nakikita ang strenght of on board advanced electronic jamming capabilities meron ang Gripen C/D. marami pa pong military drill event na nasalihan ang Gripen C/D na naging patunay na ibang level ang Gripen C/D.
Nah, kahit mga thais mas gusto ang f16v lol.
Lupet mo tlga idol😉👍🙂
Gripen E or F16Viper block 70,any of the two is best choice for our PAF!!!, Mabuhay Ang Pilipinas!!!!
F16 can not compare to even Gripen C. We have shown it since 2006. Gripen never loses to F16 or F18. We don't lose to Russia or China either.
Parehas moderno sa electronics capabilties, armas puede kahit anong ikabet mo sa eroplano, ang emportante ang training ng pilot, so dapat magtraining ng maayos ang mga pilot natin..
nice comprehensive presentation
F15-EX is better, it is the workhorse of the US Air Force and is currently the primary platform for controlling multiple drone AI dogfight fighters.
Aside from these two contenders selected for the PAF MRF the Technical Working Group may also consider a twin engine jet fighters on the level and perhaps at par with the two earlier favorites as we all know as F16V and Grippen C/D . The Ph is an archipelagic nation same as Indonesia whereby over the water flight operation and sorties wll be it's theater settings. A good medium range twin engine to look at also is the Mig35, a 4++ generation MRF from Russia. Though a slightly smaller than the USA F15SEV, Sukoi models as Su27, Su30, Su33, Su24, Su34 and Su35 . These mentioned has a lot of variants and specialities. Though far cheaper to acquire than it's Western counterparts, it is said very expensive to operate because of it's sizes and heavier weights esp. when loaded of ordinances. In contrast the Mig 35 has all their capabilities and extra range comparable to both F16V and Grippen C/D. The price tag per copy of the Mig35 is less than 50 mil..dollars . A much longer life span than the old Mig29 The PAF can pursue it's plan of adding another batch of FA50 or better a batch of the Indian made Tejas as a lighter fully capable 4.5++ gen. MRF in it's inventory that has a slightly some million dollars cheaper than the Mig35 of Russia. By the way Indian Air Force has acquired some squadrons of this Mig35 in it's arsenals. To also inform that the Grippen C/D version is no longer in the production line of Saab, They only have 14 to 15 available units for any lucky nation interested. Saab AB is presently concentrating in the development until now of the Grippen 39 E/F version with Brazil.
pwede din sana tayo kumuha ng MRF sa Russia kaso kino consider din ng PH Govt ang CAATSA.
Busit na CAATSA yan
I don´t see how you can compare Russian technology with western technology when you discuss safety issues?????? Gripen has a fantastic reliable, and robust engine
Gripen E ang first choice ko considering na may stealth fighters ang China. If ever na Gripen E ang mapili malaking boost yun sa capability natin na macounter ang China.
Pero at the end of the day ang mahalaga mag karoon na nang MRF ang PAF.
Mas mahal pa gripen e kesa sa f35
Kahit 4.5 Gen Lang ang gripen e at 5th generation ang f35 a stealth pa
@@jaysonmatanguihan3311 Kung tutuusin mas mahal pa F16V dahil mas mahal maintenance nyan kayaa sa Gripen E
@@MrYuri-iy4im Yes Mas mahal nga, pero in the future Mas madaling hanapan ng spare parts ang F16v kesa gripen, dahil merong 4000+ na f16 na kung iretire ay pwedeng gawin spare parts ng ating F16v.Kesa sa gripen na 280 lang meron.
In the future ay pwedeng mag stop ang production ng spare parts ng gripen at f16v.
@@MrYuri-iy4im cheap maintenance or not, nasa management pa rin ng gobyerno yan. South Africa uses 26 Gripens, after mismanagement, mothballed ang kalahati sa mga gripen fighters nila kahit nakakontrata pa sa SAAB ang sustainment.
F-16 is second to the lowest in terms of maintenance after ng Gripen C/D. Namamahalan pa ba tayo diyan?
Paano pa kaya yung mga SU-30, MiG-29, F-15, Rafale na ginagamit na at gagamitin pa lang ng mga kapitbahay natin sa ASEAN?? Myanmar nga mas mayaman pa NCR kaysa sa buong bansa nila pero may MiG-29 at SU-30 na notorious sa maintenance.
@@jaysonmatanguihan3311 ano mas mahal pa gripen sa f35?😂 nagpapatawa ka ata 100m dollars price f35 kalahati sa defense budget naten😅😂
Idol sorry kung ngayon pako nakapanood ulit ang bc kasi ngayong week ehh... Btw nice vid nga pla
A lot of review has Gripen E having the advantage over the F-16. The cost to operate a Gripen E is way lesser than an F-16. I believed to operate an F16 is 3-4X more than the Gripen. Also, it can be maintained by a crew of two compared to 3-4x the number of crew the Gripen E has for the F16. This is very ideal for the Philippines. Also, the electronic warfare is comparable if not better than the F-16. It's understandable why F16 has more thrust than the Gripen, it's because they carry a lot of armaments.
Sana makapili na ang pilipinas na makabili ng multirole fighter jet ang maganda sana mapili ng pilipinas ang gripen E sana yan na makuha ng pilipinas
Ang galing ng presentation nyo delatyado! 👍
complete details and info...good job sir...
Maganda a, ok ang presentation ng vloger na to a, mas ok kung may budget lang sana 36na mrf ang kunin, tig 12 units each type...
Salamat dahil nasama mo ang pagkakaiba ng Gripem E sa C na inoffer ng Sweden sa atin dahil minsan akala ng iba ang Gripen E ang inoffer nila.
Ang isa pang pinagpipilian ng PAF ay ang Tejas-Mk1A ng India na sana maging content mo rin
Very good info, but you should include the best " interim " MRF before we receive them. Did you know the that the F-16VP copied the Japanese F-2A wing structure . When Japan saw F-16c52 the Americans did not change the wobbling of the wings , the Japanese made those changes, plus added radar aborbing material and new BVR avionics, so why do have to wait for America.
Ang galing nmn, detalyado tlga. Kya pla nsbi ng thailand mas mura pa f-35. Kng ppiliin kya ng pinas yan. Bbentahan kya cla ng JSF n yan?
hindi hamak na ylamado sa electronic attack/jamming capabilities at BVR missiles ang Gripen C/D & E/F version kumpara SA f-16 VIPER. Advantage din ung shorter landing distance & turn around time na 1 minutes. kaya mas battle fit ang gripen c/d & E/F kumpara sa F-16 Viper. Mas maliit pa ang Radar cross section kaya mas mahirap madetec ng radar ng kalaban.
Nice presentation!
Recent News. F-16, single-seat, single-engine jet fighter built by the General Dynamics Corporation (now part of the Lockheed Martin Corporation) for the United States and more than a dozen other countries. The F-16 originated in an order placed in 1972 for a lightweight cost-effective air-to-air fighter.Jun 20, 2024
best Pilot ang PAF...💪🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
"Alin ang mas malakas?" The real question that should be asked is ALIN ANG MAY MAS MALAKAS NA BACKER? The United States has a habit of twisting the arms of its allies so the outcome of whatever transaction that involves US business interests favors them 😉
Mas Compatible ako sa F-16 for Frontline ang mga Gripen pwede rin siya for Back-up like Border Interceptor at panloob na kailangan kung sakali etc,etc
I LOVE THE WAY YOU MADE
Gaanu ka lakas ang jas 39 griffin next generation idol?
ganda ng animation idol
Ganda po ng mga content mo sir. Bka pwede po mga tangke nmn ang next hehe.... Sana ma notice
Great content...
The Philippines should get JAS-39C/D at least #14 as front line interceptors and long range patrol jet. And China and Russia fear the JAS -39c performance, plus we could get a full squadron in less than 2-yrs . While the F-16VP 3 to 4 yrs, the problem of getting an interim MRF like the F-16C52 it does not have qualities that of F-16VP , such as stealth composite wing structure that reduced wobbling . Only the Japanese F-2A and F-16vp have this features. We can get F-2A as an interim MRF in 8-months. I want everyone to know China has a timetable for war in the next 2-yrs in Asia w/c the Philippines cannot avoid it be must be ready in less than 2-yrs.
Forget the F16! It´s like a pimped Camaro compared to a Porsche 911 RS. The chassis, (the airframe) is obsolete. Gripen carves throw the air in steep turns without losing energy. The F16 loses all its energy if it tries to fly like Gripen. That´s why Gripen always wins a dogfight against F16. Can you see a Camaro 1968 with a new V8, and a new stereo beat a Porsche RS 2022 model at a racetrack?
Gripen E is the Key. MasMura ang Operational Cost nito than F16. And based on the Video, sa tatlo is Gripen E ang pinakamalakas overall. Mainam ito dahil kahit Hindi talaga ito Stealth Fighter, it can deal with Stealth Enemies.
Gripen C/D ang offer sa pinas, hindi E/F
Bibili po ba ang paf ng gripen e?
f-16 is a good fighter
but gripen is a better fighter
Hindi naman po sa nangengealam o nanghihimasok.Pwede pa din po nilang bilihin yung lumang f5 na galing sa Taiwan at south Korea tapos pa upgrade sa elbit system o sa Turkish aerospace. Into block 3 capabilities.Maneuverable pa din po naman Ang f5 kailangan lang po ng upgrade.Just saying lang po para makatipid.Oo nga pala nagaupgrade din po Ang Saab.
I agree sir, yung F-5 na luma ng Swiss Army binili nga ng US Navy at inupgrade din nila for modern warfare capabilities. Sana ganyan nalang gawin nila
mga lods...lamang na lamang pla tlga ang Gripen E/F sa F16 Viper sa lahat ng specs. ung Gripen C/D MS20 malakas din at pwede na maging initial na MRF. Kung matutuloy ang MRF na SAAB Gripen C/D ay malaki din ang chance na makabili din ng Gripen E ang Phil. Air Force dahil sa pre requisite ang Gripen C/D sa E/F Variant. Keep praying po lagi tayo na magkaroon na nag pondo hindi lng sa MRF na ito kundi pati na rin sa mga Naval Assets tulad ng Scorpene class submarine at advanced variant ng Hyundai Heavy Industry South Korean Frigates & corvetes.
Gripen E let's gooooooo!!
Eto Ang maayos na Gripen Variant E.. congrats Philippines
Suma total nasa piloto basta hindi masyado makaluma 4th gen.ok naman ito
Ayos ito bro nagustuhan ko talaga ito episodes u keep it up and shout out sa aking channel Kita kits ka-Metal
Gripen C/D muna kasi yun budget natin yan lang kayang bilhin. 14 Gripen piraso ang bili natin sa budgetvat mabilis ang delivery kasi available na ang airframe ng C/D. Tapus sa H3 puwede na yun KF21.
Pero mas lamang parin ang dual engine tulad ng f-14, f-15, f-18, f-22 at lahat ng Russian made na dual engine fighter jets kumpara sa single engine... Huwag muna natin pag-usapan ang electronic system radar kundi ang engine lng.. Dahil pag nag malfunction ang isang engine ay makakauwi pa sa base? Pero pag ang single engine fighter jet ang nag malfunction ay tanging pilot ejection lng ang paraan..
Gripen has a range of 120km both detection radar Lock on Targets vs F16v it has a radar detection range of 370km but it can only radar Lock on Targets 105 km. F16V Transmit/Receive Modules radar 1000 consumes more power generating more heat for Gripen's new PS-05/A MK4 radar Transmit/Receive Modules 1000 consumes less power generating less heat more efficiency and better performance. Meteor and IRIS T air-to-air missiles, low operating costs, and maintenance and alsog STOL (Short Take-off and Landing) Gripen is my choice for the MRF
that's great Gripen have a bigger advantages against other 4++ fighter such as F-15 E, F-16 Viper, EURO Fighter Typhoon, Dassault Rafale & Even SU-27 & 35 Variant. Gripen C/D & E/F have lower RCS and heat signature, have more powerful electronic jamming capabilities and fastest run around time on refueling and re arming ammunition and other operational advantages.
Your data about their Radar's capabilities are wrong. It´s not that easy to say which is better. To get a better understanding, pls look up "F-16 vs Gripen E - Which would win?" on YT. It will open your eyes to a better understanding.
@@donquixote1502 I'llgive credit & high respect to the legendary aerospace company of Lockheed Martin & other US Company, but 2013 US & NATO Red Flag RESULTS & 2015 Royal Thai Air force with China AIR FORCE military exercise results are sufficient & enough proof that Gripen C/D has an edge over other 4th gen fighter even though its radar is not as advanced as F-16 Viper. For the Philippine Air Force having a legit and one of the advanced 4th gen fighter jet is most important such as Gripen C/D with an open modular technology, no need to buy a expensive and high maintenance cost fighter jet like F-16 Viper. It's ups to the pilot how to perform an outstanding aircombat, Filipino' s are surprising when it comes to battle experience, keep that in mind.
@@markcedydabest5692 Well said. Due to Archipelagic region that Ph had, Gripen is more suitable choice for defense as well as offensive mode. Not to mention the technology that will come with it. A good choice a good path, rather best start, plus employment. that comes with it.
A modern role fighter jet to keep.
Magkano ba price ng Gripen E compared to F 35, & F 16.
Medyo malayo ang diperensya. Gripen much much better in all aspects,maintenane costs , parts support , power, agility, avionics, precision fire power, and many more. F-16 outmoded and doubly expensive and prone to parts blackmail if you fail to toe US line.
Grifen E like vipers F16 viper the advantage of the grifen E is the ladder cause to heavy dive in front of pilot can making deadly manuaver that why is best the pilot has test for heavy indurance test before rides this jets
Gnda ng animation Lods 😊
Ok yan
Sir yun Rafael naman ang i feature Sir!..😊
sir gawa nman kayo ng spyder defence system
Sir ang maganda 2/3 f16/ gripen
Ayus animation idol talaga!
jas grippin is more advance than F16v .....sa 4th gen jas grippin rank number 4 if im not mistaken......walang problema eto khit na anung weather condition .....win win for the Philippines if they acquire this jet......maganda ang technology ng Sweden hnd pahuhuli sa US yan at Russia.....
Why not consider Gripen E instead of C/D model almost same lang F16 viper but low maintenance cost
Kahit ano malakas, basta meron
correction c/d ms20 variant po
Gawan mo Rin ng content ang f22 raptor ng america
Parehas lang naman sila my air battle experience eh saka parehas din sila na all weathered aircraft pinagkaiba lang nila ay sa variant na ng aircraft ang gas tank kase ni F16 nasa tagiliran na ng aerodynamics ng F16 kaya in upgrade nila ito para mas marami itong maidala na armas ganun din si JAS 39 GRIPEN pinagkaiba nila itong si jas 39 gripen ay capable of anti ship missile at si f16V capable naman ng ABLW or airborne laser weapons
ang tanong alin ang kukunin ng Pinas.. GC or GE
Gripen cd ang offer. Magkasing mahal lang gripen e at f16v
Present lods!
Tanong dito kaya ba ng Gripen ang mga J fighter ng china na pweding masagupa ng gripen sa WPS.
Nararamdaman ko, F16 V ang pipiliin ni PBBM.
Mayron ding mirage na fighter plane na made in France na Mayron branch sa India yung HAL TEJAS MAK1 AND MAK2 MODEL
Para s akin kahit saan s kanila basta 1000 ka piraso lahat.. Kahit hindi masyado malakas basta marami panalo pa rin..
Sabra light tank please
Alin s dalawa ang agile?
Gripen ay tipid sa maintenance fir flight hour kaya mas gamit pag ganito fighter jet natin
Lods yung A10 WARTHOG NAMAN italakay mo