If Harry Potter Was Charged For His Crimes
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 бер 2024
- If Harry Potter Was Charged For His Crimes In Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001), Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002), Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004), Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005), Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (2007), Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009), Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (2010,2011)
Harry Potter was an English half-blood wizard, and one of the most famous wizards of modern times. Had he been arrested after the events of "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows", these are the criminal charges he would have faced.
Our exploration extends beyond fiction as we draw parallels to real-world scenarios. We examine cases of real-life criminals and their prosecutions, drawing on legal expertise to examine the likelihood of Harry’s criminal activities leading to actual charges.
Please note that the video you are about to watch is entirely fictional and is produced solely for the purpose of raising awareness on the consequences of committing a crime. The scenes depicted in this video are not real and do not reflect any actual events or persons. We do not condone or promote any illegal or unethical behaviour, and this video is intended to serve as a cautionary tale to deter individuals from engaging in criminal activity.
I understand we're not covering the fictional wizard laws but technically Harry would also face a life sentence for using the Imperio curse in the bank.
But it says Azkaban
As Voldemort had control of the ministry and its laws in this case Imperio or any other dark magic spells were legal.
Plus his use of the Crucio curse against bellatrix
well no its only a life sentance if he had used it on another human
@@lukesmithreborn3023No. not Bellatrix. The Carrow twin in ravenclaw tower. Because it really worked in that scenario. Bellatrix’s was out of “righteous anger “ and didn’t work
“If Harry Potter was charged for his crimes.” Dumbledore said calmly.
3:47
Harry: **throws snowballs at people and pulls their pants down**
*6 months in Azkaban*
😂
Bro i'm like 13 years then
Isn't there like something with defending others instead of self defence?
@@melonenlord2723yes
Thts sexual harassment 💀💀💀
bro the criminal profile had me dying😂
**breaks into restricted section of government facility**
**Charged with Theft and Burglary**
With all due respect, this library is part of the school he attends. He did not remove any books. The hours were not posted; therefore, he has implied consent to enter the faculty
Also destruction of government property, even in the books they damaged a ton of things in the ministry. I think a large part of these numbers are undestating, many would be much higher, breaking into and out of government institutions.
3:56 Even though his magic made her inflate it happened from unintentional and uncontrollable magic that he didn't know he could use and didn't even know existed. Also given the circumstances of his aunt and uncle's unjustified abusive behavior toward him the assault charge could easily be disputed in court
Plus Fudge tells him : "The ministry doesnt send ppl to Azkaban for blowing up their aunts"
Same could be said about letting the snake out and trapping Dudley
@@Fingernamedkid7 true...though this was before he knew he was a wizard and could not really control at the time. not really sure how that would be viewed
With the snake it would be like putting a toddler on prison because he stole something from a shelf without his parent s realizing but with Marge he did choose to not bring her down. When Vernon asks he refuses not says that he can’t
True
In Harry Potter 3, Vernon assaulted Harry and obstructed his way , Harry was defending himself using his wand. So he's not guilty of attempted murder, in fact, he never tried to harm anyone, the inflated lady wasn't intentional.
In Harry Potter 5, Umbridge tried to torture Harry with Doloris (which is a crime she knows about), something she already did and tries to drug him with truth serum (also a crime), by not saving her from Kidnapping, he saved himself, so it doesn't count.
Harry obviously knew what he was doing as he did it in response to the lady insulting his mum, and never attempted to help her - Vernon is Harry's legal guardian and was allowed to restrain Harry in a citizen's arrest if he suspected he had committed a crime.
😍😍😍😍@@cinemacop
@@cinemacopit was accidental magic, his magic reacted to his emotions, whether he felt sorry for it is different and I personally wouldn’t feel any remorse when he’d been repeatedly goaded into losing his temper because of her insulting his parents, the insults were worse in the book and lasted a week straight before he lost his temper
Can I request Trixie Tang and Jorgen Von Strangle from Fairly Odd Parents who are from California or Dimmsdale @@cinemacop?
@@cinemacop *I apologize for such a long comment, I looked up from my keyboard after typing it and realized how long it was. You don't have to read it if you don't want to.*
In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone, in response to Harry's disbelieve at the discovery he's a wizard, Hagrid asks him if there were any "strange things" that happened to him when he was "scared or angry". A witch/wizard's magic is highly undeveloped at a younger age, which is why students are officially admitted to Hogwarts after they turn 11. The Ministry of Magic may have sub laws in place that protect witches/wizards under a certain age so they don't catch the same charges as a full-time student on holiday. That would explain why the ministry never came for Harry when he performed underage magic before going to Hogwarts, because of these sub laws. It could potentially explain why no ministry officials were present at the Hut on the Rock while Hagrid was performing magic, for they could've suspected the magic to be Harry's doing. It's possible, however, that Dumbledore could've sent the Ministry a letter in advance explaining Harry's situation, in which case the Ministry would've ignored the happenings both at Privet Dr and the Hut.
Quirrell touching Potter: No problem
Potter touching Quirrell: AH, IT BURNS!!
Ah, how the tables have turned
@@dabigcheeze9689 Nah its how the turns have tabled get it right mate🤣
@@SuperHeroBacon alright mate, keep your hair on 💀💀
@dabigcheeze9689 Nah it's hair your keep on
@@VlerkeDamne fr
"6 Months in Azkaban" lol
Why are you here? The Boy who Lived...
I threw snowballs at people!
Disgusting!
I feel like these should be separate jurisdictions for wizarding and non-wizarding crimes. Also im not sure tue stuff with the snake at the start or blowing up the aunt are crimes per se, as a young wizard isnt in control of their magic. But in the other hand, im pretty sure the civil aviation authority would have something to say about their uncleared flights
Aren't you forgetting the criminal offense of that hair in his fourth year?
All charges are now aqquited
That hair was glorious
In my opinion, please don't send him to jail, he was so attractive 💀💀
Only 44 years thats light for the amount of crimes
How do you argue culp and false imprisonment in the snake scene? As an under age wizard he has no control over the magic used so his actions aren’t unlawful in just being pushed to the ground.
The only crime in real life is that reboot!
I am hoping for the best with the reboot, calm Dumbledore, smart Ron and a Hermione that isn't perfect but has human flaws. Snape being just the worst and so on :)
@@TFAric 😒 Give me a break...
@@patrickspencer6550 Alright! Recess will be 20 minutes. After the break we are doing a "What Hogwarts house are you?" test.
I hope they potray more of Harry's sassiness throughout the show
@@keshav9261 That too, I just want it to be as close to an 1:1 as possible . Book accurate duelling not flying around like black smoke or Dumbledore and Tom having a beam battle. Less dramatic Quidditch as there were many rule breaking in the films.
I don't want things "improved for the screen"
If Dominic Toretto was charged for his crimes (Fast & Furious)
It'll be longer than a Walmart receipt
@@chasethekid11 EXACTLY
This!!!🤌🤌🤌
You cook something
Lots of reckless driving charges
If Gru from Minions was charged for his crimes
Yep
Nah Better wait till Despicable Me 4 cameout
@@Ritsukazed When i said Gru from Minions, i said from Despicable Me
@@Ritsukazedthe video probably released next year cuz waiting for digital version of the movie.
Good point@@Ritsukazed
3:28 They kidnapped him, because they thought he may be needed to save Ginny, so maybe self-defense for that as well.
If Madea was Charged for Her Crimes.
Do that next.
POV: me when the headteacher finds out what I do outside of school.
It's not theft when they take back the Locket, Harry actually owns that, it was taken by RAB (since he got it, and it was Sirius' who owned it after he died, those making it Harry's when Sirius died) then stolen by Mundungus Fletcher, then Umbridge took it from him, and then Harry got it back.
It's complicated. True Umbridge doesn't own it, but neither did RAB. I think Voldemort stole it too, but he would argue that it was rightfully his as the last Skytherin. Can stolen property become un-stolen by stealing it again?
@@Blokewood3 I wouldn't say you can steal a Horcrux, they are kinda their own really, not really things anymore
@Blokewood3 but it's possible harry is also descended from salazar slytherin he and voldy are definitely related tho each descended from a Peverelle brother so the locket could technically be a family heirloom to harry too and the locket would have rightfully been voldys if his mother hadn't needed to sell it
@@elizabethdarroch3000 Good luck trying that defense in court.
"I didn't steal it your honor, this property might possibly have once belonged to a distant ancestor of mine. Maybe. I'm not sure."
@@Blokewood3I don't think it can
Harry Potter and the 44 years of hard time
You should do what if "The Goodnight Killer" was charged for his crimes, some of them include murdering 6 people in the "Black Well Hotel" and possibly even more
1:00 it was accidental magic, 2:01 dobby did way worse before, harry did almost nothing, 3:24 the teacher was supposed to defeat the basilisk so they just took him with them, 3:58 it was an accident (he used his magic in accident, without wand), 5:28 it wasnt a fair decision (from the justice) but alr, 5:49 sirius was inocent, 6:51 she spied all forms of comunications but not her own fireplace and harry would never be able to go against the centaurs: theyre very strong and both of them werent with wands, 7:11 they entered it as guests in a guest entrance and he was triyng to save a life, 7:40 he didnt knew that this spell would do that and he didnt thought the spells he found in the book vere as dark, 8:29 they were just stunned and she just obliviated the memories of seeing them, 8:52 they were falsily accused to be bad ppl and couldnt reach mundungus to have the horcrux that they wanted to destroy to save the world from Voldemort. Also, he was under 18 in almost every part (u didnt counted imperio as life-sentence, so its not magical world rules) and when not, it was in a war and he was doing it to stop the war.
Just because someone did worse, doesn't mean it's legal to do these stuff. Also he was reckless for using the spell on Draco.
1:00 - thanks that very much tru2
2:01 - yes but that doesn't mean he had the right to do this.
3:24 Lockhard had the right to change his mind, and withdraw at any time, they forced him down. Still kidnapping.
3:58 - yes thanks for pointing that out.
5: 49 - I am not sure if that changes anything or not.
6:51 - I would like to add that, 1 he never harmed her and Hermine came up with everything. Plus this was also done in self defence. Nor had harry any obligation to save her, since any action he could have take would have put him at risk.
8:52 - would add that he said "Find them" not "Kidnapp them" He never told anyone to commit a crime. But he went along with it, when they came with them. It's tricky. I don't think the fact that they were accused of anything would change much. But it was directly a part of the whole war, so maybe?
From the battle of the ministry in Movie 5 onwards, they are at war and you could probably classify Harry as a Soldier, so would everything from then on still count as crimes or as acts of war and therefore need to be looked at from that POV?
5:08 I don't remember if he did that after finding out the truth or not, but if after then was he really assisting an offender?
Edit: 5:47 Ok, I guess it doesn't matter.
I’ll wait for Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader if it happens someday.
By what law should we judge Anakin Skywalker?
@@user-bt3xv8qt3k war crimes would definitely count there
Great work!
Must do Michael and some others from "The Office"... +"Trailer Park Boys".
1:00 Should he really be charged with that if he didn't even know he's a wizard and he did it on accident? Unless I'm missing context.
Just because he didn't intent to do it doesn't mean it didn't happen and he wasn't responsible for it.
@@velikan420He would be responsible if he could have expected it, but no person would ever expect to randomly make a glass disappear and appear again.
Yeah, exactly what I was thinking. It would be difficult to prove in court (magical or otherwise) that he had any intent to do that. He didn’t know magic was real yet let alone that he was a wizard; even if he had noticed that “weird” things tend to happen to him that doesn’t mean he attempted to take advantage of this penchant for weird shenanigans to free the snake. Just because he was happy about the eventual result, that does not prove that he caused the events.
Compare this incident with Matilda Wormwood (from the Roald Dahl book)’s plot against Miss Trunchbull, in which she used her telekinetic powers. Her guilt is way more clear than Harry’s in the case of freeing the snake. Unlike Harry, Matilda a) was by that point in the story fully aware of her powers, b) had learnt to control them to a good degree, meaning any use of them was more than likely not accidental, and c) her plot against Trunchbull was planned, ie premeditated. By contrast, Harry a) had no idea at the time that he was a wizard/had powers, b) even if he was aware of the tendency for weird things to happen in his vicinity he couldn’t control his “weird luck” to kick in on command in exactly the way he wanted to (so even if he was internally wishing that the snake could be free, he couldn’t have assumed that that wish would be realised as a result), and c) did not go to the zoo with the intention of freeing the snake. Assuming that the reality of Matilda and Harry’s powers could be proved in court, it would be more reasonable for Matilda to be found guilty of her plot against Trunchbull than for Harry to be found guilty for freeing the snake.
Either way, both are young kids, not even teenagers, when these incidents happened, so I doubt they’d get taken to court (unless Trunchbull actually died; her fate is left kind of unclear but I assume she was just scared out of town).
@@velikan420Still, according to the rules of the ministry, he isn't responsible for using magic until he goes to Hogwarts because he can't really control it
He should have gotten a Breaking and Entering charge for, well, breaking and entering into Umbridge's office.
Its umbidge so its fine
Burglary charge - no breaking and entering in UK
@@cinemacop but its umbridge so he's fine
You should do a ”if Raymond Reddington was charges for his crimes from The Blacklist
Taking someone into the forbiddon forrest and getting them attacked by centaurs may be illegle for someone else, but if it's umbridge then pls take her away, she shouldn't even be considored human.....
@The Cinema Cop, I have an interesting one: Not Important / The Antagonist from the game Hatred (2015).
I think you forgot the 2 times Harry used the cruciatus cures, which would’ve landed him 5 years each
LOL I GOT AN AD AND THE FIRST THING IT SAID WAS ‘you can follow in harry potter’s footsteps in..’ blah blah blah. so ironic 😭
If being gorgeous was a crime, then Daniel Radcliffe would have been sentenced to life imprisonment
Honestly everyone should've been suspicious of why Harry was never expelled from Hogwarts when he literally breaks multiple rules every single year
I think it’s Because he is the chosen one or he just never got caught
@@DUAPLAYZ and he save the school and lives everytime, so
If Vladimir Makarov was charged for his crimes (OG Modern Warfare trilogy)
his list of crimes would pretty much be the entire plot
@@Underworlder5 There's also some other crimes that were highlighted in the No Russian intro when Shepherd opened up Makarov's file to Allen.
how about crimes that umbridge had done, her changes of them would be 10 times worse then harry's.
With some stuff I agree, but most of this is stuff you would just get expelled for or get baned from ever using a wand again, like Hagrid. And you have to keep in mind that most of this happend, while he was a minor, so there you would also have to adjust the verdicts.
Next one: Lincoln Clay from Mafia III, please.
Do if Ryuko Matoi was charged for her crimes (if she has any that is)
I would argue Harry used accidental magic in the Sorcerer's Stone, he had no idea he was even a wizard at the time and the Ministry of Magic won't go after a child for doing it
4:34 if this is an assault then i must be sentenced to death by now...🤣
I mean what is it?
I want to be Harry Spotter, the guy who lifted
You could also consider kidnapping Draco in the shrieking shack scene. If you look at the clip, Harry drags him over a fence, said fence is probably a property line.
If Nicholas Mendoza was charged for his crimes (Battlefield Hardline)
Do if NATHAN DRAKE WAS CHARGED FOR HIS CRIMES
we need more characters!!
I don't know how much it contributes to the sentence, but the first crime is clearly unintentional.
Edit: I think a threat of strangulation is more a threat of assault than a threat to kill.
Edit 2: I think the snowballs + pants pulling would even if technically illegal would get laughed out of any court room, and would at worst result in community service.
cruciatus on bellatrix and a couple of imperius curses while robbing gringotts left the chat
Nice to see you using their rules
Next one is if Cloud Strife was charged for his crimes.
You forgot that Harry Potter used Cruccio against Bellatrix Lestrange in Movie 5 after Bellatrix Lestrange killed Sirius Black!!! So Harry Potter would face a Lifetime Sentence in Azkaban!!!
That’s not true
@@KadeStringer2.0 It is - the use of any of the three Unforgivable Curses is a life sentence in prison. Multiple people on both sides say it - Hagrid, Barty Crouch Jr, Barty Crouch Sr, Snape and I believe Neville Longbottom all make references to it being a life sentence. There are of course exceptions - if you can prove that there was good reason (i.e, an Auror uses one in the line of duty) or that you were under the influence of the Imperius Curse, you won't be prosecuted.
but the curse didn't work / didn't went off. So I guess it doesn't count? (I mean I know that usually it doesn't change anything, if you try to murder and fail due to you incompetence or not. But you have to keep in mind that it failed because he didn't want to do it.
can i tag along w making these vids i have a couple shows/characters i wanna do
Who?
1:22 that part sounds like a commercial
I cannot imagine if you would count others like Snape, the Malfoys and even Umbridge.
Do terry silver next please
also harry was under 18 in some parts, if youre not counting imperio as life sentence than ure using muggle's law
Day whatever of asking you to make if Sachiko Shinozaki was charged for her fund
Doesn't the map have limitations. I didn't think it could tell you exactly what a person is doing, just where they are. Could someone tell me. Cant find a vid on everything it can do.
In movie 5 Harry uses the Cruciatus Curse on Bellatrix, as an unforgivable that is a life time in Azkaban and you showed him use the Imperious Cruse on the goblin that would have the same results, there could be a argument that goblins don't have the same rights as wizards and that it would not be lifetime using it on a "magical creature"
Iirc doesn't the cruciatus curse fail, so it would only be "attempted cursing" or something lol
I think it worked, she did fall on the ground (at least in the movie, can't remember the book scene right now.) it didn't work well but it still did something.
@@TFAric it's been a while since I read the books, but I seem to recall her not being that affected, laughing it off and telling harry he had to mean it
Do L. Malloy or R. Wesley next, please.
At 7:40: I see the argument that Draco could claim he acted in self-defense, but if you are armed and agressively accuse someone of a crime and that person draws a weapon and starts shooting, is it grievous bodily harm if you shoot back and injure that person? Maybe Harry should be charged for the way he confronted Malfoy, but the curse itself was self-defense in my opinion.
If someone is using self-defense against you and you caused them to use self-defense purposefully or by recklessness, you are not allowed to use self-defense.
Does this mean if you were reckless and caused someone to panic and try to kill you all you can legally do is allow him to kill you? Seems pretty absurd to me but since I am not an expert I don't know whether this is true.@@JKBDTS
@@patrickdematosribeiro1845 If that guy is just paranoic, then he's not using self-defense, he's trying to murder you and you are allowed to defend yourself.
8:32
My thoughts: "My father will hear about this!"
Hold on, in Order of The Phoenix, what did Harry steal?
If you referring to the thestrals, those are wild animals, that are only partially used as livestock. We see this in the scene we’re Luna is feeding them. They are not in pens, and clearly are only used on certain occasions and not owned by anyone.
Also, I’m pretty sure trespassing onto government property is a different and much harsher sentence in Britain.
you forget about Crucio, the torture Curse, Imperio and Crucio would give him 2x life in Prison
"The use of any one of them on a fellow human being is enough to earn a life sentence in Azkaban."
So the imperius on the goblins dosn't count.
@@jimydog007 He used it on Bellatrix in Order of the Phoenix and on one of the Carrows in Deathly Hallows. Still two life sentences.
@@curtisevans8413 Oh you're right. I've totally forgot that.
I got a Harry Potter ad before😂
Can you do Jason Voorhees was charged for his crimes?
Would them freeing Sirius and buckbeak not be illegal since dumbeldore told them to do it 🤔
I agree with the self-defense one!!!
I dont know the specifics, but arent their reprocussions to flying in airspace without a license?
1:22 it's that your real voice?
I'm shocked you didn't do the flying car, which would have at least been driving without a liscence, and grand theft auto, as they had taken it without permission and had no way of giving it back.
idk some of those are kind of tenuous even if the CPS chose to charge he could get off about half of them with a competent barrister.
for instance, melting quirrell given his age, reasonable fear for his life and that he couldn't have reasonably foreseen that pushing him away defensively would harm him. In real life, he gets charged 0/100 times.
These sentences are really lenient. Us muggles get crazy sentences.
And one of the most powerful criminal masterminds of all time Thomas marvolo riddle aka Lord Voldemort
How would he got just 2 years for manslaughter???
Minimum
he did get a warning from the ministry for using magic in the dursleys house
If John Hammond were charged for his crimes. (Jurassic Park)
He wouldn't get charged for the first one. He wasn't eleven years old at that point and didn't even know about the magical world although the last part is on the Dursleys
If Kisaki Tetta was charged for his crimes (Tokyo Revengers)
5:46 unlawful custody*
5:08 he... was innocent?
5:46 and here..?
The greatest badass criminal masterminds of all time are albus Dumbledore gellert Grindelwald Voldemort Severus snape and Harry Potter
The only thing i would argue is the scene in the coffee shop. It was only self defense. The death eaters attacked 1st and when the kids defended themselves, they didnt use force greater than what was used on them.
It is self-defense but it was illegal for them to erase their memories
@@cinemacopthey didn’t have a choice
How did you get Azkaban sentences from?
I wonder how much Sirius would get if he was charged with his actual crimes.
Do godfather characters
now do the Tom Riddle!!!
throwing snowballs and pulling down their pants would be criminal mischief which in the UK falls under criminal damagee for which the max penalty is 10 years imprisonment
So According to Hermione: 44 years in Azkaban and "worse" 😂 ;)
You forgot harry using the cruciatus curse on Belatrix
3:56 Cornelius Fudge said there would be no charges for inflating his aunt like a balloon
I think the video is what if he was charged in the end.
I do not think Harry should be punnished for sectumsempera against Draco. He didn’t know what the spell was for one thing. And for another Draco was attempting to murder someone. So in reality I think he did the right thing😊
honestly, considering that record, he should have gotten more haha 😆😆😆😆
0:14 Daniel Radcliffe (and therefore also Harry Potter) is 5’5” not 5’11”
Pointing his wand at Vernon was a spur of the moment threat which is still a crime but not the one you charged. He didn’t cast a spell so no murder or assault attempt was actually made.
Murder was for Vernon's sister
@@JKBDTS that wouldn’t be murder, attempted or otherwise either.
@@Evoker23-lx8mb Unless Harry did it on accident, I think it is fair to consider it an attempted murder.
@@JKBDTS it was an accident. An accident he didn’t regret in any way but still.
@@Evoker23-lx8mb Why did he panic so much then?
What about the use of the Unforgivable Curse? That’s an automatic life sentence right there.
Since he is under the age of 18 he most likely on be charge as a Juvenile. And spend 2 to 4 or until his 18 birthday in a Juvenile prison/ Reform School depending on what country he is in.
He is in England
What if the whole trio was charged with their crimes?