New Zealand Girl Reacts to THE SWEDISH SUBMARINE THAT SANK A US AIRCRAFT CARRIER

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2024
  • Original Video - • The Swedish Submarine ...
    BONUS content on my Patreon - / courtneycoulston
    🤗 Join our Discord Community
    / discord
    🍿 Twitch Livestreams:
    / courtneycoulston
    🔒 Join UA-cam Membership for Early Video Releases 🔓
    / @courtneycoulston
    📲 LINKTREE
    linktr.ee/cour...
    ❤️ Second Channel
    / @courtneyworldwide
    📸 Instagram
    @courtneycoulston
    🎥 Tik Tok
    @courtneycoulston
    🐦 Twitter
    @courtcoulston
    ☕️ Buy Me a Coffee
    www.buymeacoff...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 274

  • @danielolson5378
    @danielolson5378 3 роки тому +77

    The American navy had leased 2 Swedish submarines of so called Gotland class. The Swedish marine took an older so called "Sterling engine" and like modified it and basicially made it impossible to detect by radar/sonar. The reason America wanted to leas them was to exercise in shallow waters. Maybe hard to believe but the Swedish weapons are among the most advanced in the world.

    • @TheDinmamma12
      @TheDinmamma12 3 роки тому +14

      not that hard to believe actually since sweden ranks on top of almost everything :P

    • @Errr717
      @Errr717 9 місяців тому +3

      They only leased one; just the Gotland for 2 years.

    • @danielolson5378
      @danielolson5378 9 місяців тому

      @@Errr717 Ok my bad thanks for correcting me :)

    • @magnusk4352
      @magnusk4352 8 місяців тому

      @@Errr717They leased the HMS Uppland, not the HMS Gotland if I’m not mistaken.

  • @mikeh6286
    @mikeh6286 3 роки тому +47

    I read a comment from someone claiming that during the game the Gotland sub had taken images of the Ronald Reagan captain having breakfast and sent these to them during the games. It supposedly had made them furious.

  • @Hilariumosis
    @Hilariumosis 3 роки тому +18

    The Gotland-class diesel submarines are a defensive sub best for ambush strikes where there's no need to stay under water that long, it can hide behind islands to surface between attacks. And the Stockholm archipelago alone has 6000+ islands, and the Baltic sea being shallow relatively speaking it can move where most subs and ships can't. The combination of islands, shallow watern and the submarines remarkable agility makes it very hard to outsmart and hit with torpedoes. A lot of ways to protect itself from incoming torpedoes.

    • @WolfHeathen
      @WolfHeathen 2 місяці тому

      The Baltic ocean has an average depth of just 55 meters. It's very shallow. This is one of the main reasons for why the Gotland subs all have 48 externally mounted naval mines. It's extremely easy to deploy them in shallow waters.

  • @simonbeaird7436
    @simonbeaird7436 4 роки тому +41

    In 2000, the HSwMs Halland (Gotlands' sister sub) took part in NATO exercises in the Med. In three mock engagements she defeated a Spanish Navy anti-submarine group, a French nuclear attack sub and the USS Houston ( a Los Angeles class nuclear attack sub).

    • @lothwinmore2536
      @lothwinmore2536 3 роки тому +7

      Think that was the reason USN contacted Swedish Navy. Think they stopped outside Ireland on the way back and did it again.

  • @kingwacky184
    @kingwacky184 3 роки тому +21

    Sweden is very high tech even with its small army. They produce very state of the art equipment some that even America use. They are a friendly ally with the Americans and the UK, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, Germany, France and their allies. They are not the biggest army but they are still not one you want to mess with. They know what they are doing and they got the equipment to back it up. Of course they would not survive alone against a big nation such as Russia for example. Their goal is mainly to survive the fight long enough for allies to come and help. They are starting to buff up their army, navy and air force big time though and for the next 5-10 years I believe their military capabilities will increase many times over.

    • @AbsoluteZero6714
      @AbsoluteZero6714 3 роки тому +2

      The new US advanced jet trainer the T-7 Redhawk (think that’s what it’s called) is a collaboration between Northrop-Grumman and SAAB.
      The US is installing Israeli Trophy APS systems on Abrams tanks.
      And the Constitution class frigates will be a collaboration with Italy.

    • @JorgenPersson-jo4sc
      @JorgenPersson-jo4sc 3 роки тому +1

      @@AbsoluteZero6714 The new US LCS warships will have the SAAB SEA Girafe AMB radar.

    • @AbsoluteZero6714
      @AbsoluteZero6714 3 роки тому +1

      @@JorgenPersson-jo4sc Very interesting. What’s the name of this new class?

    • @JorgenPersson-jo4sc
      @JorgenPersson-jo4sc 3 роки тому

      @@AbsoluteZero6714 SAAB is in the front of GaN technology ASEA radar for land, air and SEA. The SAAB Sea Girafe AMB radar has been bought by USA for their Littoral Combat Ships (=LCS warships).
      www.saab.com/newsroom/stories/2019/may/how-saabs-sea-giraffe-amb-was-selected-for-six-classes-of-u.s-ships
      SAAB is a huge company that not only makes the Gotland class submarine, also the Visby class STEALTH Corvette and Gripen E fighter...etc...
      Visby Class Corvette.
      ua-cam.com/video/H9RdcmICyuQ/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Saab
      Gripen fighter
      ua-cam.com/video/wv9yG6-gyzc/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Tonkatsu298

    • @blackve_mbi15
      @blackve_mbi15 3 роки тому +2

      @@AbsoluteZero6714 Wow I live in Italy and I didn't know this about the Constitution class frigates

  • @Shiftry87
    @Shiftry87 3 роки тому +12

    This will be good, she dosent know its a training situation yet. This is so good her expresion was so perfect in the beginning.

  • @JohanHaagg
    @JohanHaagg 2 роки тому +4

    We are a small country, we focus mainly on peacekeeping and dipolomacy. This also meens we are most of the time underestimated when it comes to actual fighting capabilities. Back in the 90ies, we toke part in the peace keeping UN opertation. The Serbians nicknamed the troops ”the blond furies”. This nickname came mostly from our Female soldiers.

  • @rCRTEr
    @rCRTEr 3 роки тому +11

    Yes if you live next to a former superpower that you even attacked historically then you need to have good defenses :) Yes I am born and raised in Stockholm and have even been in the Swedish military but not the navy but the army.

  • @jonasvogel6875
    @jonasvogel6875 3 роки тому +13

    We actually have very good relationships all three of us, Sweden, New Zealand and USA. Here is another video that I would like to see your reaction of. This is also on a naval theme, where USA got a little Swedish contribution. This is about a Swede who came to the US and constructed a ship which eventually helped the north states to win the civil war.
    John Ericsson was not so succesful in the beginning, neither in Sweden nor in Great Britain, and not in USA in the beginning neither. But his construktion of a certain war-ship turned him to an American national hero!
    ua-cam.com/video/_HVPmi-5hfs/v-deo.html

  • @ex-navyspook
    @ex-navyspook 4 роки тому +9

    Captain of the REAGAN to the supporting anti-submarine warfare assets: "You're all f@#ing fired!"

  • @lassehult7468
    @lassehult7468 3 роки тому +3

    Hi. I live in Sweden and I know they have been working updating 22 new systems and the engine on the sub. Here is some what have been released. "The upgrade process includes many important systems, such as Stirling AIP, sonar, sensors and management and communication systems. The submarines in the Gotland class are the first conventional submarines in the world to be equipped with a single optonic mast that replaces the traditional periscope. On-board security that prevents data intrusion is another important addition that makes Saab a world leader in IT security for submarines".

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому +1

      I would teach Sweden how to build better subs in my backyard.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому

      @Van Aser Which one?

    • @nissekarlsson3172
      @nissekarlsson3172 Рік тому +1

      We really should plug in an Vodka sensor, then the Russ would be detected without any other sensor activated, and earlier.😅

  • @paddoksa9451
    @paddoksa9451 4 роки тому +36

    god bless the HMS Småland

    • @MaskinJunior
      @MaskinJunior 3 роки тому +3

      R.I.P HMS Springaren

    • @stigpalm1922
      @stigpalm1922 3 роки тому +1

      Småland is a museum piece I served on 1961

  • @Obstinate28
    @Obstinate28 4 роки тому +13

    As an ex submariner I can confirm... this is the fun shit. :-P

  • @arocosadventures724
    @arocosadventures724 3 роки тому +19

    Swedish Tech is awesome 👍🇸🇪

  • @joshuahagley8542
    @joshuahagley8542 4 роки тому +8

    This video was amazing Courtney. I really love tuning in to your reaction videos as always. PS: Stay Safe.

  • @Stephen-cr3sc
    @Stephen-cr3sc 3 роки тому +1

    That's one of the points of war games, to have your "opponents" find flaws in your defenses. Also to learn to work together. Sweden seems to lean towards finesse, the U.S. seems to lean toward massive force.

  • @lisamaitland157
    @lisamaitland157 4 роки тому +2

    It was a simulator event.. Although Electric/diesel are very silent if on electric... We lost a few in WW2, from Bombers and ship to ship fights.

  • @CorvusCorax.
    @CorvusCorax. 3 роки тому +2

    Sweden: "Hold my beer"

  • @WolfHeathen
    @WolfHeathen 2 місяці тому

    Australia did the same thing with their sub but they were much cooler because they decided to announce their victory by blasting Men At Work's hit song "Down Under" so the Americans could hear it on their passive sonar.
    And to add to the accolades of this Swedish sub, in 2000 it took part in two different large-scale exercises. One in the Mediterranean where she remained completely undetected for the whole duration while recording her "friendly adversaries", and during a NATO exercise in the Atlantic where she won a mock duel with Spanish naval units, a French SSN nuclear-powered submarine, and the American SSN submarine USS Houston.

  • @ispbrotherwolf
    @ispbrotherwolf 3 роки тому +16

    Hi from Sweden, and yes, if we would, we could :-) But this was a training thing, but they could not find the Swedish sub. For several times :-) USA hired the sub and crew for 2 years, still could not find it. Damn we Swedes are good :-)

    • @l.av.h7812
      @l.av.h7812 3 роки тому

      Yes, our tech is the most advanced after the US

    • @DirtyMikeandTheBoys69
      @DirtyMikeandTheBoys69 3 роки тому +1

      No different than when Russia snuck a sub through your territorial waters and you couldn't see it either. 😅

    • @DirtyMikeandTheBoys69
      @DirtyMikeandTheBoys69 Рік тому

      @Shinei of course they do, they're telling you stories. Doesn't change the fact the Russians snuck a sub through your waters and you spent weeks looking for it.

    • @Errr717
      @Errr717 9 місяців тому

      Well we Americans are good too. We developed the passive sonar system in San Diego no less by Signal Processing Systems.

  • @FritzOFN
    @FritzOFN 3 роки тому +2

    the fun thing is, that there was a swedish liason on the carrier, and they asked him..where is the submarine, little did they know, that he pointed on the map exactly where the sub was...they thought he meant the general area, he even did this twice.......

  • @goldrush5764
    @goldrush5764 4 роки тому +6

    As a Swede I must say that im pretty proud of our military technologies. We are a small country but we have one of the best military technologies in the world. Sweden was the first country to develop these kind of submarines. Then everyone started to copy us.. ;)
    The thing is that we are always underrated as a country when it comes to military technology. Maybe because we are such a small country, no one cares about us.
    Another underrated thing is our fighter jet, JAS 39 Gripen (The Griffin). There is a military exercise called "red flag" were alot of countries join. Sweden has amazing kill scores compared to other countries that use different fighter jets. What they say is that we were only beaten by the F-22 in kill scores, but just barley and that fighter costs alot more money then our fighter. You could by like 4-5 JAS 39 Gripen (Griffin) for one F-22.
    Then there has been one exercise with Norway, they have the F-16, and the kill scores were 0-5, 0-5, 1-5. So, what I'm trying to say is that the JAS 39 Gripen (Griffin) is another underrated military equipment thing coming from Sweden, like our Gotland submarine.
    But also imagine the fact that a country of only 10 million people produces one of the best fighter jets (and submarines.. :D) in the world. That's pretty impressive considering that no other country of that small population size in the world does the same.
    Here you have another of our cool toys. An amazing stealth corvette:
    ua-cam.com/video/FrPgOhVXsXw/v-deo.html

    • @verozety4040
      @verozety4040 4 роки тому +1

      If you think that the Gotland class submarine is good you should look up the Blekinge class, wich is going to be Sweden’s new main submarine.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому

      @@verozety4040 Nah I could build better in my backyard. ;-)

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому

      Yea agreed looks cool but it's just a toy really. Classical design failure many naval engineers get stuck with.
      All that design and efford to reflect radar signals ... And then they put the heat exhaust of the pump jet propulsion above the water? lol!
      Stands out like a massive red dot even to common non military weather satellites. Your not fooling anyone with that sorry. Really love how it looks but no thanks.

    • @Djekebeek
      @Djekebeek 3 роки тому +1

      Listan kan göras lång men Sveriges ombyggda leopard 2 (stridsvagn 122) anses vara världens bästa pansarvagn. Stolt svensk🇸🇪💪

  • @genoson1128
    @genoson1128 4 роки тому +4

    Dark Docs is one of my favorite UA-cam channels out there

  • @CaraVerde
    @CaraVerde 3 роки тому +1

    "All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable..." ~ Sun Tzu, The Art Of War.
    That's where the "when we are able to detect, we must seem unable/vulnerable" comes 😜

  • @kevinschindler618
    @kevinschindler618 5 місяців тому

    We in the US welcome this. This helps us both learn and upgrade...the Swedish have some of the smartest scientists and engineers on the planet...we respect their technology.

  • @kentinatl
    @kentinatl 4 роки тому +5

    CC,THIS WAS REALLY A COOL VID..AND AS USUAL YOUR REACTIONS AND STATEMENTS WERE VERY WELL SPOKEN AND DIRECT,YOUR OVERALL WARMTH AND KINDNESS IS ALWAYS ON POINT..YOU ARE THE BEST GIRL..ALL MY BEST,KENT IN OHIO.

    • @zacharystfu
      @zacharystfu 3 роки тому

      Simp

    • @kentinatl
      @kentinatl 3 роки тому

      @@zacharystfu media3.giphy.com/media/7BK3ZB7nNf2Jq/200w.webp?cid=ecf05e47gm0xddgjojmuqmt8zprfvle048zhow3673z1f0xl&rid=200w.webp

  • @FancyPants43
    @FancyPants43 4 роки тому +2

    Yeah, this was during the war games in mid 2000s to see if another country can penetrate a single US NAVY fleet. Don't worry, it wasn't real but that opened alot of eyes and gave ideas to counter act there signatures. Not sure how due to propriety information. You know, "For Eyes Only".

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому +1

      Yea tell that to the Chinese sub popping up alongside that US carrier, lol!

  • @Markatta73
    @Markatta73 Рік тому

    I don’t know for New Zealand, but the backbone of The Collins-class submarines in Royal Australian Navy is a diesel-electric submarines based on the Swedish Gotland submarin class platform developed by SAAB Kockums Sweden.

  • @TheMajorActual
    @TheMajorActual 4 роки тому +2

    No aircraft carrier has been sunk since Vietnam, when the _USNS Card_ (a WW2 escort carrier) was mined by Viet Cong sappers (she was later repaired and refloated....the Navy, predictably, refuses to admit that she was actually "sunk", just "damaged and repaired"...She was sunk) in the Port of Saigon. Carriers are bonking-expensive, so most countries don't bother operating them....That's changing -- and the last time that happened, it was the 1930's.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Make of that, what you will.

  • @Djekebeek
    @Djekebeek 3 роки тому +3

    we are building a next generation of submarines called Saab a26, the first will be ready in 2024. it will be equipped with all the new technology we have developed. it will be invisible on the radar.

  • @nilselgenstierna3282
    @nilselgenstierna3282 6 місяців тому

    Three facts neglected in the video (by a Swede):
    1) The Gotland is designed to sink Russian navy vessels in the Baltics. The US would never let an aircraft carrier or a nuclear sub into the Baltics, even after Swedens accession to NATO.
    2) Nuclear vessels emitt a lot of noice which makes them an easy target to silent subs. But watch out; China are developing air-indepentent subs suited for the South China sea.
    3) Sweden have 5 (not 3) air- independent subs.

  • @jameskoralewski1006
    @jameskoralewski1006 3 роки тому

    This happened during war games where countries compete to see if they can penetrate the defenses of the American carrier group. No real shots are fired, it's all simulated..

  • @ronbruce6923
    @ronbruce6923 3 роки тому +2

    It's a good thing. Problems identified/problems fixed

  • @BornRandy62
    @BornRandy62 3 роки тому

    check out a video titled Sinking a Aircraft carrier. 45 minutes documentary. (for your own entertainment not for reaction per se) it documents the months of work in a dockyard weakening the built in protections . And then the difficulties encountered actually sinking the ship. A Carrier wirth crew present and protections in place can be severely damaged but it will be extremely difficult to actually sink. Any ship that floats can be sunk.

  • @davidd5523
    @davidd5523 4 роки тому +2

    Not the first time a carrier was sunk in an exercise. Wont be the last. AIP is the only thing special here.

  • @ethericboy
    @ethericboy 3 роки тому

    Ok random unknown girl from New Zealand, I"m so excited to see your reaction to what this Swedish u-boat acheived

  • @danielpearson482
    @danielpearson482 3 роки тому +1

    When a video says european or especially Sweden, the first mistake many people make is to think little of them. All european powers militaries are small, but they are advanced and every so often they do have times like this where the titan of the usa is bested by their tech and/or tactics. Luckily usa and europe are all allies forever but european military power is heavily overlooked.

  • @dennislindqvist8443
    @dennislindqvist8443 3 роки тому +2

    I think a US aircraft carrier was sunk in the battle of Midway, that's the only time I know of.

  • @robertonavarro7713
    @robertonavarro7713 Рік тому

    Hypersonic missiles could be more dangerous to any super carrier than torpedoes. A direct hit could possible ignite the tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel on the top deck and assorted missiles and nuclear bombs stored in its lower decks. The 6,000 officers and crew members could be trapped inside the carrier if the enemy missile hit without warning. Super carriers are simply huge and expensive primary targets.

  • @andrewironfist7250
    @andrewironfist7250 4 роки тому +3

    WW2 Okinawa Uss Yorktown & Uss Hornet

  • @larrysomers1654
    @larrysomers1654 4 роки тому +3

    to be honest it wouldnt hurt us navy to utilize that type of sub least for its own shoreline defense

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому

      I would agree but? USN elites fed money disagreed sorry. It's called the Non Nuclear Option to buy the AIP design subs and build them instead of the proposed nuclear submarines. Meaning for every 3 billion USD submarine? They could have had 10 of these submarines.
      Never got into details even. Now imagine there is an Ocean Going version? Kinda why NATO's operational mission Ocean Shield saw those subs picked over underperforming nuclear subs.

    • @Jayjay-ef2gt
      @Jayjay-ef2gt 3 роки тому +1

      Can't blame them for thinking they won't ever need to defend their own shores. The US military is not focused on defence like most NATO countries are.

    • @marktuttle3609
      @marktuttle3609 Рік тому

      The U.S. submarines are better than this sub. You just don't hear about it because they are too good for anyone to detect.

  • @caliber04
    @caliber04 4 роки тому +2

    I do not know if you do singing reactions but you should do one for Home Free. I would say Man of Constant Sorrow would be a good place to start. Anything but Mayday that one must wait until you have heard a few of there song.

  • @alexrobert3485
    @alexrobert3485 4 роки тому +1

    That's a old aircraftcarrier!🤣🤣🤣

    • @Jayjay-ef2gt
      @Jayjay-ef2gt 3 роки тому +1

      USS Ronald Reagan is the second most modern Carrier in the Nimitz class. It was comissioned in 2003. That's not old for a nuclear powered aircraft carrier. And the Swedish HSwMS Gotland was comissioned in 1996. It's a fair match. Both are still in use.

  • @revtoyota
    @revtoyota 4 роки тому

    Dark Docs is a great channel just wish they didn't do click bait tittles. They should of added it was a mock sinking during war game exercises. Loved your reaction at the beginning and when you realized it was a mock sinking it was priceless.

  • @Bajro97
    @Bajro97 4 роки тому +28

    If you think about it, aircraft carriers have never been engaged in an all-out war such as World War II. There is no way to know for certain the foibles and full potentials of complicated weaponry until tested in unconventional scenarios. Only think of the number of perfect-looking rifles that militaries have either discontinued or radically redesigned after their first extensive real-war test.

    • @mrlevittown
      @mrlevittown 4 роки тому +10

      Your comment is confusing. Many carriers were sunk in World War II. Japanese, British and American carriers and many thousands of men went to the bottom.

    • @robbykwizz555
      @robbykwizz555 4 роки тому +4

      Read more about history, bajro, there were carriers in ww2, I guarantee in real world scenario if Sweden sunk us carrier the first time, but they won't get the second one the same way... these war games are too prefect military doctrine and strategy, so Sweden found a flaw so they can patch it up, good thing it was not a real-world conflict or several thousand men and women wouldve gotten killed.

    • @douglascampbell9809
      @douglascampbell9809 4 роки тому +3

      You need to hit the history books.
      Aircraft carriers fought the majority of all the pivotal battles in the Pacific in WW2.

    • @matyasslavik8657
      @matyasslavik8657 4 роки тому +3

      Tell that to HMS Formidable during the Battle of Cape Matapan who used her guns in a fleet action in a surface-mode. Yes, she was in a battle-line, and it is according to the sailor who was aboard. Don't forget the Falklands War in which the RN used 2 carriers.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому +2

      @@robbykwizz555 I want to know what to read. You read fake history.
      The real proven fact history of JTFEX 06-2 is very clear ofcourse if you read it. US lease the Gotland for one year. Gotland sinks US carrier ... then again ... and again ... and again for an entire year. US then extends lease for 2 years? Gotland keeps sinking one carrier after another for another whole ... year.
      USN never detected it for two whole years and the Gotland owned the USN with everything they threw at it. Scoring more CV and US attack submarine kills then all exercised combined setting a new record.
      Why you say USN 'patch it up'? That is just a lie from fake history.
      We remember Ocean Venture? We read real history again. One single submarine sinks US carrier during Ocean Venture. US find the flaw and patch it up? Nope same day one single submarine sinks another US carrier.
      Please state this history you read. I think it's made up fake history.

  • @Richie8406
    @Richie8406 Рік тому

    Love that people go nuts in the comment section.
    Yes. The story is true. Yes, Sweden has been allied to the USA, since at least jeans hit our shores. What did the Soviets have?
    Now finally, NATO. Years training.

  • @jamesvandemark2086
    @jamesvandemark2086 3 роки тому

    Yes- the US Navy was mortified!

  • @soapplayswt
    @soapplayswt 3 роки тому

    today sweden has 5 submarines and are making more

  • @eblixhandlez2895
    @eblixhandlez2895 4 роки тому +1

    Noti gang🔥🔥 love the vids

  • @KimWonUng70
    @KimWonUng70 3 роки тому +1

    We havet them for defence so Yes they are made for our coast ☺

  • @jvilhelml
    @jvilhelml 3 роки тому +7

    🙂👍Good Swedish Work

  • @marktuttle3609
    @marktuttle3609 Рік тому

    This is not surprising at all. Any half decent submarine can sink any aircraft carrier. During RIMPAC '81 I was stationed on the USS Gurnard (SSN 662) a nuclear submarine that was built in 1969. We both sunk the aircraft carrier and escaped after the attack even though sinking the carrier temporarily gave away are position. I was on the firing key for this attack so I know first-hand what happend.

  • @soapplayswt
    @soapplayswt 3 роки тому

    and some gotland submarines have gotten upgraded

  • @edwardwhisler5785
    @edwardwhisler5785 3 роки тому +1

    Those pesky Vikings:-) Cheers from California.

  • @holstfly1
    @holstfly1 4 роки тому +1

    Can't wait for you to react to part two of over simplified!

  • @MrBergakungen
    @MrBergakungen 3 місяці тому

    they asked, and now they know

  • @MZ-bl6wg
    @MZ-bl6wg 3 роки тому +1

    The US Navy responded to this stating submarines were not in play in the excersize they were doing , that was suppose to be 2 days later. The US fleet wasn’t looking for subs and not in threat so yes the Swedish SU either got confused or wanted to seem to do the impossible

  • @charleswilkerson3408
    @charleswilkerson3408 3 роки тому +1

    If you get a chance, please watch, “Down Periscope”. It’s a funny movie that is very similar. Lol. It’s a comedy.
    I love watching you. Be safe and take care. 😘

  • @elvinjonas5451
    @elvinjonas5451 2 роки тому

    Those Swedes are descended from Vikings!

  • @labansjogren9429
    @labansjogren9429 7 місяців тому +1

    Någon måste glömt att släcka lyset när de gick hemifrån....

  • @lazyblazer
    @lazyblazer 4 роки тому +1

    Amazing reaction as always! You should react to nuclear warfare! (atomic, hydrogen bombs, etc)

  • @soapplayswt
    @soapplayswt 3 роки тому +1

    it was a training not war

  • @martinfarrer5742
    @martinfarrer5742 3 роки тому +1

    You should look at the British military Courtney 😉

  • @macjonte
    @macjonte 4 місяці тому

    Australia has purchased the Swedish subs. About 20 years ago?

  • @soumyadipbiswas6835
    @soumyadipbiswas6835 3 роки тому +1

    React to Can US aircraft carriers protect itself from Brahmos?

  • @sunflowerlady1810
    @sunflowerlady1810 4 роки тому +1

    Was your heart torn? Mine would have been.

  • @HemlockRidge
    @HemlockRidge 4 роки тому +1

    This was a good thing. It demonstrated some weaknesses of the US surface fleet. This happened in 2005. I'm quite sure steps have been taken by now to prevent this from happening in the future. One learns by one's mistakes.

  • @demopem
    @demopem 3 роки тому

    If you're small you have to be sneaky instead.

  • @cole42412
    @cole42412 4 роки тому +3

    Hey Courtney. Can you react to Superbowl 42 mic'd up. It is between the Giants and the Patriots. The Patriots were on an undefeated season but the Giants ended up winning. It is arguably the biggest upset in NFL history.

  • @MrSoulreaper1234
    @MrSoulreaper1234 4 роки тому

    I love your videos i am watching them here in hawkes bay new zealand

  • @lesliemurphy7808
    @lesliemurphy7808 4 роки тому

    I was deployed on 3 Carriers during my tour of duty and this flat out scares me. I Love your interest and we hold your amazing country/continent as a dear ally. I had heard of this story for years and you have finally seen the video thanks to you. Keep it up Courtney! I think I Love you!!! LOL

  • @user-lj9pb9io8n
    @user-lj9pb9io8n 4 роки тому

    Great video very informative i had no idea 🤔🤔🤔 thank you 😊👍

  • @robinmyman
    @robinmyman 3 роки тому

    Seen this before...we (UK) are doing this for real on a daily basis...hunter killers sneaking up on enemy boomers...if enemy opens its launchers outer doors without warning...boom!

    • @TheIceman567
      @TheIceman567 3 роки тому

      Do you like the USA and Americans?

  • @absolutezero6423
    @absolutezero6423 4 роки тому

    I am pretty sure a american carrier has never been sunk before. Japan "Hold my beer" ................

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому

      Vietnam ... hold my backpack bomb. ;-)

  • @larrywt656
    @larrywt656 4 роки тому

    Yeah, the producers of this video are guilty of CLICK BAIT. We all get suckered in by it from time to time. In reality, if Sweden had ever actually sank a US carrier, it wouldn't have ended well for Sweden. Even though this video had a very Hunt For Red October feel to it (actually one of my favorite movies), I'm sure that the US Navy has already figured out how to defend against this technology, but the world will never know what that defense is. I'd be fairly certain that they've also already figured out how to make their own nuclear subs more stealthy as well. US carriers have been sunk in the past, but it has been a long time since the last sinking.

  • @daddyhugeblackman3861
    @daddyhugeblackman3861 4 роки тому

    I never heard of anything like that happen and I know a lot about the military

    • @antdog6784
      @antdog6784 4 роки тому +1

      It was a wargame

    • @daddyhugeblackman3861
      @daddyhugeblackman3861 4 роки тому

      @@antdog6784 oh nice

    • @mrolsen6987
      @mrolsen6987 4 роки тому +1

      @@daddyhugeblackman3861
      So you don't know much about military then...
      This exersice is world wide known.

    • @daddyhugeblackman3861
      @daddyhugeblackman3861 4 роки тому

      @@mrolsen6987 I do but I never new this war game happened I know what a war game is but I didn’t know that it happened rn lol

  • @willveglianti6144
    @willveglianti6144 4 роки тому +1

    You should react to Leo Major one eyed scout

  • @jeremywhittington7605
    @jeremywhittington7605 4 роки тому +1

    The Americans saw it... believe me😉

  • @douglaslockard1517
    @douglaslockard1517 4 роки тому

    This is what I used to do

  • @jx6040
    @jx6040 4 роки тому +7

    You should react to Christian McCaffrey 2019-2020 highlights. He’s the best running back in the NFL.

    • @oluwagafavour4201
      @oluwagafavour4201 4 роки тому

      😆

    • @Montweezy
      @Montweezy 4 роки тому

      He's playing this weekend!!!!!👍👍👍👍👍

    • @freddyleard6721
      @freddyleard6721 3 роки тому

      Then how have I never heard of him

    • @Montweezy
      @Montweezy 3 роки тому

      @@freddyleard6721 watch him he plays for the panthers. This is his 3rd year. He was the #1 pick in most fantasy drafts and had 1000 yards rushing and 1000 yards receiving last year. Check him out sometime. He's been out 6 games this year with a high ankle sprain but had 2 TD and 100 yds this past weekend against the chiefs.

  • @markviking98
    @markviking98 4 роки тому

    always need to watch darkdocs at .75 speed, he talks so fast lol

    • @rexuz2482
      @rexuz2482 4 роки тому

      Yes. He mumbles a lot. Really hard to hear some words in almost every sentence.

  • @pramodsalunkhe7041
    @pramodsalunkhe7041 4 роки тому +1

    React on
    How much powerful india?

  • @martas1981
    @martas1981 3 роки тому

    she known's another shafts :D

  • @mattb.1357
    @mattb.1357 2 роки тому

    It was a mock exercise it did not actually sink

  • @n.g.h.calmarena7013
    @n.g.h.calmarena7013 3 роки тому

    I'm a Swede and you know, we wanted to show our loyalty with the American people and wanted to sink any ship with the name of Donald J. Trump, but such a ship couldn't be found. So another president had to take the torpedoes, namely Ronald Reagan. Sorry, but don't elect presidents like Trump, and don't build and name a ship with this president's name.Sweden will immediately sink it.

  • @n3izhyped622
    @n3izhyped622 4 роки тому

    Kia ora , what part of NZ are you from I'm from chch , what's your thoughts on the referrendem

  • @kairaj6495
    @kairaj6495 4 роки тому

    React to American Fork High School Marching Band 2019 show please. It is so good.

  • @HalkerVeil
    @HalkerVeil 3 роки тому +1

    So why is she so into military stuff?

  • @jehoiakimelidoronila5450
    @jehoiakimelidoronila5450 4 роки тому

    The reason why the carrier alone can't detect the swedish sub is because it didn't have sonar. That's why the carrier depends on its escort vessels & *why* it doesn't travel oveseas alone.
    The reason why it ALSO doesn't have sonar is the big boat is jam-packed with epuipment. Little to no space for sonar.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 3 роки тому

      Yea just fake news. You can easily evade US sonar cos it sucks.
      Funny how an entire US Carrier Battle ... group's sonar all failed. ;-)

  • @henriklorenzen7516
    @henriklorenzen7516 3 роки тому

    HELLO .. Many people today perceive big things in size ..? Size does not make one stronger, but is often only a larger target, and there with greater vulnerability ..! Technology or military muscle power, certainly does not always have to do with the use of billions of money, but in fact often far more often has to do with efficiency, and it may just as well be technologically cheap, and also have low muscle power, but which then hits precisely , while you yourself are invisible .. Such big words, self-confidence and a huge consumption of money, do not guarantee an effective defense .. !!!

  • @peolindstrom8570
    @peolindstrom8570 3 роки тому +1

    More fun to watch your face🇸🇪👍🇦🇺

  • @walkingwounded3824
    @walkingwounded3824 4 роки тому

    Cool video.

  • @xxcaptainpicklexx264
    @xxcaptainpicklexx264 4 роки тому +1

    Hello

  • @michaelmika875
    @michaelmika875 4 роки тому

    Yessuh!!!

  • @Peregrin3
    @Peregrin3 3 роки тому +2

    Russia's new Poseidon nuclear torpedo makes current naval defenses obsolete, they could take out that entire battle group with just one and it wouldn't even need a direct hit.

  • @unitedwestand5100
    @unitedwestand5100 3 роки тому

    Lol To all you haters out there,
    Virtual is not reality. Taking a picture is not firing a real torpedo.
    It would take far more than one torpedo to sink a US Aircraft Carrier. The things are "virtually" unsinkable.
    Fire a real torpedo, and you lose the Stealth, And we just deploy a anti torpedo counter-measures. Similar to anti-missile technology, they destroy the torpedo before it reaches the ship.
    Once you fire one you give away your position, and shortly thereafter we destroy your submarine.
    That's reality!

  • @calleskurken9025
    @calleskurken9025 3 місяці тому

    we ar NOT SWITZERLAND

  • @pramodsalunkhe7041
    @pramodsalunkhe7041 4 роки тому

    Hey react on
    How much powerful india?

  • @douglaslockard1517
    @douglaslockard1517 4 роки тому

    I'm OPFOR

  • @TheThomasdahl
    @TheThomasdahl 3 роки тому

    Could you please post a link to the original video so that we can watch it without the girlie grunts and inate comments..?