1960s Super 8 film transferred to 1080p HD video & color corrected - AMAZING!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лис 2020
- If you want your movie film transferred to digital the right way, send it to a real professional, not Legacybox or Kodak Digitizing. Brad Miller of Film-Tech Cinema Systems scanned this Super 8 film to 1080p HD and 2160p Ultra HD using a Lasergraphics Scanstation Pro 6.5K and applied color correction to it, and even without more advanced processing to clean up the image, I'm amazed at the quality of the results.
Brad's UA-cam channel FT Depot has other films he's scanned: / ftdepot and here was the e-mail he sent me detailing the conversion of this film:
"The resolution on this print is quite low for Super 8mm. Actual reversal home movies, especially those shot on Kodachrome 25 and Kodachrome 40 look impressive for how small the image on the film is, but this is a reduction print dupe of a dupe so it's more soft than typical 8mm film. Regardless, the 1080P file is plenty high enough resolution to capture all of the available data on this film, but I've included a 4K version of the scan as well if you will be watching on a 4K monitor and don't want to upscale.
I think you will find the image cropping differences between the MovieStuff scanner used at Legacybox to the Film-Tech scan quite shocking. We actually had to crop a little bit more than typical around the edges of your image due to the various garbage in the aperture of the camera, but even with that when you compare the two scans, the MovieStuff scanner cropped off almost half of the available image volume on the film. (And FYI the little black line you see in the upper right corner is printed INTO the film. It isn't a "hair in the gate" of the scanner.)
Also surprising, Legacybox didn't even transfer the first 13 seconds of your film.
As we always do, we did a courtesy basic color correction. As films fade over time besides the colors fading, the overall density is lost as well, so blacks become light grey and lights become washed out. This is why you may compare the two scans and the Legacybox might appear "brighter" in some shots. Our density compensation should be pretty close to the film print from when it was originally manufactured though. (All of the white lines and marks you see on the image is dirt and scratches on the negative these prints were struck from.)
Finally, your film doesn't have any splices in it. The various "jumps" you see in our transfer are literally splices that were pre-printed into the film. (A really bad jump example is at 0:13 in our file.) Any image bounciness you see in our file is also printed into the film.
Note - We included a silent audio track on the H264 file, as we have found occasionally there is player or editor software that doesn't like mp4 files without an audio track.
Should you decide to post some side by side clips on a followup video, it would be appreciated if you could mention that Film-Tech did the followup comparison scan. ( www.film-tech.com | / ftdepot ) There are a lot of these "professional video transfer companies out there, and most of them are nothing more than a guy working in his garage to wildly varying levels of quality, usually with homebrew equipment rigs.
Thanks,
Brad" - Наука та технологія
This transfer is fantastic, and the music is even better.
I agree, the color correction is pretty spot on considering the badly faded dyes in the original film.
Is it the original music?
@@onyourjackjones No, there is a video here of a compact record playing those songs, it is named "Music for squarewave moods" I think
@@onyourjackjones The tune was "Sunny Side of the Street", by the way.
PS: The correct name is "Music for Many Squarewave Moods
", here is the link, SUPERB music, i absolutely love it, and it is on my favorite record music playlist ^^
ua-cam.com/video/2jrGaCzGGtM/v-deo.html
I'm glad you exposed such a pitiful company and are directing people in the right direction.
I knew they did a bad job from the get-go !!!
That organ music is so 60s. Took me right back.
I usually associate organ music with silent pictures. But wasn t alive in the 60's so...
@@kyria_kous MIDI doesn't have any sound.
When I was a kid in the 60s my neighbor had a organ that sounded just like that. I could hear it if my bedroom window was open. They played it so loud.
The color correction simply looks stunning.
Now THIS is what I call a high quality restoration.
Too bad the original is a pretty low-quality positive print (a copy). It's a LONG way away from first-gen (non-copied) films, even shot on comparatively (say, 100) high-ISO film stock. Both Super8 film and the scanner being used are capable of FAR superior results.
I think it was filmed in 1963. That's when Charade came out. It was playing at the Chinese Theatre.
completely incompetent vs highly skilled
this scan looks incredible
I couldn't believe the colour that could be retrieved
im guessing a ton of colour correction was needed to fix that. I'm guessing that legacybox probably just did a raw scan, didn't check the file or anything and just sent it as it was, but the other company actually took time and care with the scan - even if the colour wasn't on the film itself, colour correction is a damn powerful tool
I was also surprised at how well the color correction worked! I expected some restoration with a lot of leftover fade but that's really Incredible
I think you'll find desaturating the reds and magentas reveals hidden details and color information in shocking ways.
There are some amazing AI programs to restore color now.
@@5roundsrapid263 Neural networks tend to make stuff up. It's debatable how much of that qualifies as restoring.
Legacy box seriously gave you a 640x480p scan of the film in 2020!!!
Didn't know it was 1998.
And they didn't even try to color correct it, wow.
It looks like they even zoomed and cropped their crappy scan so a lot of the movie is missing.
well, actually, scanning this movie with anything over VGA would be an overkill. It’s of VERY low resolution - I’d say around 100*150 or only very slightly higher.
i use a scanstation where i work to scan film and it’s amazing. i keep hearing legacybox commercials on the radio. i always knew they were a fraud. good work exposing them! (i should’ve volunteered to scan your film when i saw the legacybox take-down video!)
Loved the corny background music. The absolute perfect match for that kind of filmed material.
Here is the whole version of Music for many moods that I have just uploaded ua-cam.com/video/LyOLKnhCcNQ/v-deo.html
About film aging, i've noticed recently that all of the Kodachrome slides that my grandfather took basically look brand new and the Ektachrome ones are all turning magenta-just thought you would find it interesting☺️
Ektachrome is bad for fading, and whatever Hollywood used for film back in the day. There used to be a company, Seattle Filmworks, that would use cinema film, package it in 35mm canisters, and sell it to photographers. I believe you'd get both slides and negatives/prints from the film. (It's been so long, I forget), but their film had a terrible red-shift as well. All my Kodachrome slides are still nice, and I'm glad I never shot Ektachrome. (I saw my dad's Ektachrome slides as a kid, and decided not to use it, just on a hunch)
Kodachrome is the most colour-stable film stock in existence. That is because Kodachrome is actually a Monochrome film which gets its colour dye added during the processing. A process that was very complicated and expensive but was the reason why Kodachrome colours hardly even faint. That is also why Kodak at one point stopped producing and processing Kodachrome entirely. Normal Colourfilm is only colour-stable for 50 years and then starts to fade. Usually the green and blue fades first as these are the outer layers of colourdye, leaving you with only magenta at the end. Ektachrome even fades a lot quicker. It is estimated that Kodachrome may be colour stable for at least 100 years.
@@jonglass I used Seattle Filmworks and RGB to shoot a bunch of 5247 (the film type) negatives in the 70's and '80s. They printed the negative to the matched positive stock (I forget the type) and/or to prints, as ordered. My positive slides made before about 1982 eventually faded badly to magenta, but slides from after then still look decent today. The 5247 negatives had a different color profile than Kodacolor (etc.), and very few "kiosk" photo printers had that profile available, and so wouldn't want to bother with printing it. Fortunately, even the pre-'82 negative stock seems not to have faded and I've gotten good results with scanning and correction.
@@KRAFTWERK2K6 All Kodak, or Eastman color positive films made before 1980 use to fade very quickly, which was the reason to develope low fade film stocks. Old Ferrania used to fade to blue. Most stable film stocks, beside Technicolor and Kodachrome, was East-German Orwo, but it was generally the worst film stock ever (too grainy, unable to push up or down without color loss, "creamy" colors).
@@BlueNeon81 Yeah ORWO was actually AGFA East but they weren't allowed to use the AGFA brand. So they became basically ORWO. My parents used quite some of their colour stock in the 80s. Yeah their colour stock was pretty bad. It looked very low-res, rough and unusually bad. Even if shot with actually good cameras & lenses. They looked liked 3rd of 4th copy generations from a print. Black and White stock however looked pretty good.
Holy. Shit. This is incredible! He managed to restore the colour to this nearly colourless film?!
Can't believe a one-man business would have better service than a team of so-called professionals.
That man knows his job well, and deserves to be promoted, not like legacycrap.
As a long time member of the Film-Tech forum, I can vouch for Brad and both his technical savvy and his business and personal ethics. I would gladly pay for him to restore my old super8 films, many with sound. Thanks for uploading this!!
Loved the new conversion. Gave me nostalgia for an era I wasn't born yet.... People outside enjoying a simpler life....
It takes me back--rampant abuse of animals for entertainment, the haze of leaded gasoline smog in the skies and no concern for emissions, no seatbelts, airbags, or crumple zones to take the excitement out of a car accident.
@@mayshack i bet the smog smelled amazing
Brad is da bomb! Practically took an insignificant little 8mm film and made a masterpiece! Old film doesn't need to stay looking old!
The footage of California was from 1963, based on the Grauman Chinese Theater playing the movie "Charade". This is one of the most beautiful restorations I've ever seen with the colors and scenery of the footage. The Hammond Organ music adds to the magical charm of the 1960s era. Seeing Americana footage like this certainly satisfies a film lover like me.
No idea if Brad will do this for everyone, but I sent an email just in case. The results on this video are impressive. I have some 8MM movies from my great-grand uncle, which he took when my grandfather was in his early twenties (my age now). My grandfather is still alive and fairly well, and I'd like to convert those rolls to digital. They were put on VHS, then on DVD using the projection/camcorder method, but I want to go one step above. There's a good amount of footage on there showing his trip to New York City in the 1950s, which I'm hoping was around the time the Singer Building was still standing. Regardless, a lot of that footage I think has significant historical importance, and I emailed Brad to see if he can do the same thing with the rolls of film, with whatever price he decides on.
Once the footage is digitized, I'll then get my grandfather to narrate as much as possible since we have notes on it.
Will you post the commented movie on your channel ? That would be the kind of thing I would be willing to watch.
Yeah seeing those would be really interesting. It's these types of home movies shot by ordinary people that I feel are hugely important as they give a real insight into the lives and communities of real people of yesteryear.
Now that is something I could get behind. I have a Video8 PAL machine and I am looking for old cassettes to just digitize what might be more or less good cam-footage but is also now history. I would love a more serious machine for more serious mies (such as the one Brad is using) but I fear that it will be very expensive...
I take it there hasn't been any progress on this yet. It sounds so damn interesting and I'm all hyped up to watch it.
You will get the best result if you work from the original film prints (if possible) - conversions in the past to DVD or VHS will have degraded the quality enormously. The best way is to use a frame by frame high quality scanning and software equipment to achieve HD resolution. Super 8mm film will give a much better result than the older standard 8mm.
The best thing about working second shift is getting to watch a VWestlife video at 2:30am!
DUDE IT'S 23:32 WHERE I AM
@@Aperson90839 Nice, I would have been getting out of work by then!
I work normal shift but I am watching at 3:30 am!
Watching at 6:41 AM (Eastern U.S.)
He did one hell of a job on that film. I enjoyed watching it. Thank you.
That organ music reminds me of a old Hertz Mountain record I had as a kid and it had birds singing on it along with the organ music. The purpose of the record was to try to make your canary or parakeet sing and keep them company.
The last transfer video kind of made me sick to my stomach, seeing this will make me sleep better at night.
It looks like it was originally shot and edited on 16 mm and copied to 8 mm negative, from which this copy was made.
That music reminds me of a baseball game when I was a kid.
Charade was playing in the theaters!!! And I love the "Cuba Baion" feel of the song you chose. ;-)
Flippin' 'eck!
That's it for the moment! As always, thanks for watching.
Film-Tech: "I'm gonna end this Legacybox's career"
Thank you for showing the differences! I believe my father in law has some old film he'd like to get into digital, and I for sure will be recommending he consider Film-Tech. As someone else said, the spectacular results speak for themselves!
Good restoration, very stable image and the speed looks good.
That came out wonderfully, and that version of Sunny Side of the Street works perfectly with it.
Preservation of history, amazing technology
Great job! It shows the importance of doing some investigation before you send off your media to be converted.
he does nice work.. I have my dads slides from Sea World and the Zoo from that time period.. I grew up a stones throw away from Sea World.. I learned how to ski at 7 years old in the waters of Mission bay :)
I have some old photographs that turned very red and I was surprised how simple it was to get the colors back with photoshop. They were not as red as this movie though.
You used the curves adjustment, right? Now try it on original mars photos for a nice surprise.
@@SuperFinGuy I think I used the color balance slider. You mean red mars photos and turn them into "normal looking"? I tried that and it worked fine :) Easiest was to use "automatic colors"
@@UncleAwesomeRetro I believe there's also methods where you click on a part of the image which should be white, or close to it, then simply so fine adjustments after that. Lots of ways!
@@kaitlyn__L Yeah that's true. I use that often in premiere.
I had a ton of Boy Scout Jamboree slides which had red faded and desaturating the reds worked a lot of the time.
He did a great job in the scan/grade. I almost miss working with film. I used to work on rank Cintel telecines, Spirit classic and Spirit 4K data cine, and got good at tuning the Filmlight Northlight 1 & 2 scanners. If I’m not mistaken, the scanner he used is optical registered (they scan the perf, and stabilize the image optically), where the northlights were pin-registered, and a total pain in the ass to restore old film even with the “shrunken pin” restoration pin-blocks! Never did anything smaller than 16, tho. Thanks for a bit of nostalgia!
I really enjoyed this look back at old California. I recognized some of the locations.
Thanks for sharing! Marineland is LONG gone, but I've certainly been to many of the other places in the film! Very fun and great quality!
This is much better, completely watchable
I went to Marineland back in elementary school for a field trip. Was so much fun! 1982
The same goes for 35mm photi negatives, trust me. Some photo studios I went to just scanned them with a cheap integrated scanner, yelding....weird results. Way worse than the prints. After I mailed the negatives to a legit laboratory I got some of the highest quality scans I have ever seen. They looked way better than what my phone or digital camera could do at the time. (both in color and resolution)
*photo
Makes you wonder if this was shot at regular 8mm and then just mass-copied to Super 8? Seems to be from the early 1960s before Super 8 was introduced by Kodak. Brad did a great job on colour-grading the poor state of the film to give it back its colours to his best abilities. :) Pretty cool of him offering you to transfer it properly. I'll totally check out his channel as well.
Yup, the original may have been shot on something low-quality to save costs. This, of course, results in absymal quality and resolution. Back in the day, “proper” (pre-made) home movie companies used 16 or even 35mm masters. With these companies, it was VERY rare to use 8mm input.
An example: the East-German DEFA, of which I have tons of 8mm and Super 8mm releases (costed me a LOT to order all those films off eBay.de, LOL….) - see ua-cam.com/play/PL4_1cuziVtq_fGwM1vN-iV97M8As94hqP.html
Again, as with ORWO, being East-German doesn’t necessarily mean rubbish. Don’t think (most of) these films are generally technically inferior - on the contrary!
Only one of the several DEFA films I have (and scanned) has significantly worse quality than the rest: a travel film shot in India ( ua-cam.com/video/kFStUZvz2cM/v-deo.html ). Well, I can certainly understand Germans didn’t want to lug around a 16/35mm camera that far away, so they only took a 8mm camera with them.
And an example of using a 35mm master: for example, the “Science of the Soviet Union” film at ua-cam.com/video/tkNZbn_oXKE/v-deo.html . (Check out the still-visible original 35mm perforations showing it was indeed copied from 35mm!) Absolutely wonderful quality for a Std8 film!
BTW, speaking of proper S8 distributions, here’s a Super8 release of the same DEFA: ua-cam.com/video/-jhiGbSBlwU/v-deo.html The resolution is just incomparably better than that of the California film, showing the master was of high quality.
Wow! Much better. It was nice of Brad to do this for you. Definitely adds further weight to your point in the previous video.
Looks like a dream
I didn't realize LegacyBox used a MovieStuff scanner in their hack job of your film. MovieStuff has been in business for years, and their scanners are generally decent. I have one of their older Retro-8 720p scanners, but you still need something like Avisynth+Virtualdub to denoise and degrain the film and for color correction. A wet-gate transfer would still do better (more $$$, too). For a dupe the Film-Tech transfer is quite good. Glad it worked out for you.
Hopefully Roger at MovieStuff sees LB's hack job with his equipment and does something about it.
I love the electric organ music so 60s!
Such a difference in quality. Color me impressed.
Not bad. At our University we also digitize those 8mm films. Its a great thing to test a multitude of algorithms if they work well, color correction, image stabilization, dust & noise reduction, its fantastic for developing those. Even working with known algorithms from MatLab etc. works really well. Im glad I took the image processing course.
4:20 That part of the film is very good at highlighting poor city planning and building decisions of the time
oh dear, I hadn't noticed it was all freeway! my British brain half-looked at it and assumed the stuff down below was train tracks 🥲 rip walkability... though I suppose in the day it seemed like "wow! the future!!"; I mean, you see it all over sci-fi illustrations, extrapolating their current course into visions of cities with 3 or 4 layers/storeys of freeways all stacked atop each other, and sometimes running from building to building fully suspended. Imagine what a hellscape navigating one of those on foot would be! (Presumably pedestrians would be shunted off into their own elevated walkways, a la some projects tried and failed in London in the '60s, forget what they called them now, skypaths or footways or something)
Pedways. This guy has a good video about them: ua-cam.com/video/TvCUgWnptUc/v-deo.html
Thanks for the link, never heard of this concept in regards to London. The similar concept been tried (and failed) in Zelenograd, and everywhere i stumble upon similar multi-level pedestrian routes (La Defence in Paris, Hong Kong) it's super confusing (although Hong Kong did it much better than any other place i know of).
Soviet cities tried and many post-Soviet cities still are trying to rely on underground crossings for every street possible, pretty terrible idea on practice route planning-wise and accessibility-wise (even made a video featuring those in Moscow). ua-cam.com/video/9SzXnoeY09s/v-deo.html
@@Vokabre oh, neat, I'll add that to my watch later. UK underpasses tend to be pretty good for wheelchair accessibility, but they're somewhat rare, generally just for cutting under a dual carriageway (more accessible than a bridge tall enough to go over it, slope-wise, at least). I've noticed in Tokyo there's seemingly a lot of bridge-type road crossings, those seem pretty bad for wheelchair accessibility, but at least generally seem well-marked with tactile paving and high-contrast handrails and stuff?
Edit: actually, scratch that, I've come across really steep underpasses, here and there, which might pose a challenge I suppose... most of them are on a gentle grade though.
@@kaitlyn__L The main advantage of Tokyo and urban Japan in general that the bridges tend to have elevators and/or are optional i.e. use the bridge to avoid waiting for a green signal; while Soviet and post-Soviet urban planning tend to have similar bridges (especially around train stations) but with no accessibility features and no way to avoid them.
Those colours are incredible, so much better than the other transfer.
brilliant work by Brad!
I'm glad we got to see the legacy box transfer color to see what an impressive job Brad did
Excellent results.
That's incredible. They did an amazing job.
This video reminds me of the new Borat movie. California: subsequent moviefilm transfer.
4:06 , That looks so familiar. Is that the location Lucas used for the establishing shot of the Mos Eisley Spaceport in Star Wars episode 4? it looks like a very similar angle too.
Seems like so, they filmed extensively in Death Valley
3:26 is where they filmed the Endor scenes for Return of the Jedi.
3:38 look like beginning of Gilligans isle
I had the same impression
This looks so much better than the previous transfer!
The colour correction is amazing ! And yes, it is a pretty bad film to begin with, I have colour reversal home shot Super8 reels that rival 720p movies (better than a DVD but worse than 1080p)
“it is a pretty bad film to begin with” - It indeed has very low resolution, particularly for a S8 film (as opposed to Std8). REALLY bad. But, of course, it’s not the fault of the scanning company.
Awesome to see a quality transfer job compared to the stunningly crappy LegacyBox transfers
It's great to see one more old film preserved into digital format. Digitizing the large amount of existing old films in high quality is a huge task that, because of film degradation, has to be done mostly by the current generation. I think that's a subject that should be discussed more. Many people don't realize how many films there are to be preserved and how small the time and other resources to preserve them is. It's unfortunate that there are dishonest companies like Legacybox that only make the problem worse.
Amazing colour correction! And lovely images.
Thanks for sharing this new transfer, pretty awesome the quality!
The music fit in it perfectly too, kinda nostalgic...
Amazing restoration
That's better and the music goes a treat with the footage.
Very good clues for proper transfers from analog movies to digital files... Thanks!
Wow! This is incredible - never knew it could look this good 😁
WOW! What a difference compared to legacybox? That 8mm film was AMAZING!!!! thanks for sharing!
What a difference high quality equipment and a little bit of care can make.
Amazing how the blue colors came back, great job by Brad. The background music fits perfectly. I guess the downvotes are from Legacybox 😉
I noticed a 4:27 that it features Grauman's Chinese Theatre which was showing the film Charade with Cary Grant and Audrey Hepburn which came out in 1963. So that could possibly date the film to right around 1963.
This was pretty cool to watch, thanks for sharing
Wow, that is great. Brad is definitely on my suppliers list now.
Thank you so much for sharing this wonderful video.
Wow. The film transfer looks very good and the color correction is fantastic!
An amazing job, including the colour restoration.
Superbly done!
I've linked this video and the other one about legacy box and sent them by e-mail to legacy box.
The difference is insane :O
4:10 “This is the city. I carry a badge.”
@4:15 Parker Center
Awesome seeing this restored plus seeking cars you can't see anymore just amazing . music fits this so well. The music was included thats great! It sounds like something my grandmother or grandfather would play on the lowrey organ I learned in . my grandfather learned how to play piano . but my grandmother and myself would use rythem built in never using the bass peedals like this had. Very cool Kevin. *****To add as i listened to music and seen previous comments I found your video of the lowrey organ demo record you did a video of. Whats funny is the beats and instruments are still being used in newer organs and the. Rythrms are still there today.. the one I learned at age 4 was a lowrey Heritage from 1991 then a lowrey Coronation until they passed grampa Oct 31 1922 to feb 11,2014. Age 91 And my gram Nov 27 1927 to Dec 25,2017. At 90
This is super cool thanks for sharing.
Excellent transfer! I wonder if that was the original "Shamu" at Seaworld near the end? The timing might be right. And Marineland having porpoises jump through fiery hoops? Many years later "Blackfish" was released and the Seaworlds had to be better.
Nice video transfer. We went to San Diego for two weeks each trip in 2008
and 2009. The San Diego Zoo looked
similar to your film. The entrance, animals and the seals performing. We
stayed at Mission Bay, near SeaWorld
on the first trip, in 2008, and Harbor
Island facing the Naval Base at Coronado on our second trip in 2009.
This looks awesome!
...That Music! wonderful!
Wow he has done a fab job on that great quality 👍👍
Forgiving that the film print is several generations away from the original negative, the results are fantastic and put Legacybox to shame. With a lower gen copy and some minor gate weave and dirt removal, it would look amazing.
That was beautiful!
2:21 Ew, is that film monochrome?
2:26 HOLY SHI--
There is french program called Film9 that could be used for correction of old media like 8 mm scans. It meant for this purpose it can improve the quality a lot.
Brad Miller the magician. They must surely have a better original tape at universal? Perhaps they haven't any commercial interest in digitally mastering their all their old content?
They probably do not even know what they have, and so much has been lost forever due to a combination of aging film, film rotting and turning solid, and it simply being destroyed or thrown away. Remember there have been a number of film vault fires, that destroyed massive swathes of film stock that was on the "will get a round tiut" list for conversion to newer stock or some other preservation method.
The post processing looks fantastic. I kind of wish this upload was a higher bitrate so there would be less compression on the film grain. The uploads on the FT Depot are also 1080p but look slightly sharper on the low mm film. Can we have the original H264 files like in a google drive link?
Unfortunately, UA-cam removes a lot of the film grain. This makes the footage far less film-like and subjectively slighly lower-resolution. (But not really objectively - I’ve done a lot of pre/post comparisons with my high-quality S8 scans and found out that, while UA-cam does remove most of the grain, the noise reduction only very slightly reduces the resolution. So it’s not THAT bad. Nevertheless, I love film grain.)
W"OW" what difference!!! It just shows what a good transfer company with good equipment can do!
FORGET Legacy Box! i don't care how many good (shill) reviews they get!
Back in the 1960s, California, specifically Los Angeles was introduced to the world of Spanish television in the form of KMEX Television Canal 34.........................Los Angeles.
At first I was like... yeah, the quality really isn’t that great. By the end, I forgot I was watching a near- 60 year old tape. Impressive.
3:05 - Techmoan - this music is for you! Those childhood holidays in Heysham and Cleveleys!
That colour correction is remarkable.
I like how he did the color correction.
wow he did a great job!
The Wolverine 8mm/S8 transfer machines become pretty awesome for the price once modified with the Hawkeye mod. There's even HDR scanning.
Great job Brad! I’d use your services if I needed them. Does Brad do 16mm camera negatives?
You can contact his service here bmiller@film-tech.com
I'd like to see a side by side comparison between original and this transferred film.
It is insane how they actually repaired the color fading
That film came from my hometown