Deadliest Military Ships In The World

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 691

  • @Wow55579
    @Wow55579 3 роки тому +48

    1:12 this guy actually put a glock sound effect over a cannon xD

    • @SuperEHEC
      @SuperEHEC 3 роки тому +1

      The .50 cal sound for ak630 and the 76.2mm Auto canon is worse to me

    • @maxwellmortimermontoure7274
      @maxwellmortimermontoure7274 3 роки тому

      Nah, that sounded like a sig to me.

    • @jules___
      @jules___ 3 роки тому

      😂 So misleading.

  • @alpha5449
    @alpha5449 4 роки тому +31

    FREM is missing. A lot of images do not match the story telling.

  • @DukeOfChirk
    @DukeOfChirk 4 роки тому +81

    The French vessel on the thumbnail looks absolutely stunning....

    • @alfredneuman6488
      @alfredneuman6488 3 роки тому +14

      Designed to protect their fishing boats while plundering post Brexit UK waters.

    • @sylvainbrosseau6239
      @sylvainbrosseau6239 3 роки тому +1

      My thought exactly.

    • @jassimaltoki3580
      @jassimaltoki3580 3 роки тому +7

      @@alfredneuman6488 blame your politicians

    • @markknoop6283
      @markknoop6283 3 роки тому +1

      The looks is probably the only thing that works.

    • @alfredneuman6488
      @alfredneuman6488 3 роки тому

      @@jassimaltoki3580 They don't plunder the waters where I live

  • @mitchellorchard2163
    @mitchellorchard2163 3 роки тому +37

    Shows a newzealand flag while talking about Australia 🤦‍♂️

    • @williamhutchinson7
      @williamhutchinson7 3 роки тому +2

      the flag was not NZ, we only have 4 stars

    • @mitchellorchard2163
      @mitchellorchard2163 3 роки тому

      @@zeromii3234 im Australian i dont need to Google it... i have one in my shed.

    • @tigerpjm
      @tigerpjm 3 роки тому

      @@zeromii3234
      Pretty sure we know what our flag looks like champ, and it doesn't have red stars on it.

  • @pbrazor50
    @pbrazor50 4 роки тому +84

    "It would be a sitting duck. . .." FIND ME A STOCK PHOTO OF A DAMNED DUCK!

    • @TheNefastor
      @TheNefastor 4 роки тому +1

      Or simply a photo of the USS Cole with a giant bomb hole in its hull... what, too soon ? :-D

  • @ruliw8520
    @ruliw8520 2 роки тому +1

    The ship in the thumbnail is the cutest thing i've ever seen

  • @jacobzimmermann59
    @jacobzimmermann59 4 роки тому +18

    The German MKS-180 is perhaps the most impressive overall. Special mention to the C-Sword though for the sexiest looks and intriguing tech. By the way, the French are now giving English names to their ships? Sacrebleu, what has the world come to? ;)

  • @brussell639
    @brussell639 4 роки тому +58

    I'd love to be able to buy the C Sword 90 and convert it into my own personal yacht. But I still want the guns left on it.

    • @emanym
      @emanym 3 роки тому

      No way, lose those guns and put in a jacuzzi .

    • @thecolorteal6132
      @thecolorteal6132 3 роки тому +1

      @@emanym is it too much to ask for both

    • @terryfreeman1018
      @terryfreeman1018 3 роки тому +1

      Hey brussel639, If you get one let me know. I'll bring some beer and we will go fishing. Plus if I can shoot your guns...I'll buy you dinner. 😶🤗

    • @terryfreeman1018
      @terryfreeman1018 3 роки тому

      It is a sexy booger.

  • @gumbi79
    @gumbi79 4 роки тому +21

    sword c90 looks the most next gen design and very good all round caps for a corvette class

    • @domonicmalcolm443
      @domonicmalcolm443 4 роки тому +4

      So true it looks the coolest and i like how it's complement is as well as such diverse capabilities but I also like the one from Germany,

    • @thezorglub50
      @thezorglub50 4 роки тому +4

      i don't know much about the design, but i can say that is not getting built. CMN isn't in a good financial state at all, and nobody ordrered a C SWORD 90 since 2014. I have doubts, maybe an african country bought some for anti piracy purposes, but i can't find any trace of it on the internet. CMN is eating dust right now, and i'm pretty sure the C sword 90 doesn't belong on the list with the others, while it does look cool.

  • @kaustshroff381
    @kaustshroff381 4 роки тому +14

    That Type 55 is NO JOKE. It's advanced weapons systems, stealth, and capable radars make it a very formidable foe.
    Especially when Zumwalt is non-performing as of right now.

    • @aintnobodycare6193
      @aintnobodycare6193 2 роки тому

      Once the US gets the railguns or some other high-tech weaponry on the three Zumwalts, those things are going to be deadly. The Arleigh-Burke flight 3A is another thing to look at

    • @spartangoku7610
      @spartangoku7610 2 роки тому

      @@aintnobodycare6193 we canceled the rail guns, too high maintenance.

    • @aintnobodycare6193
      @aintnobodycare6193 Рік тому

      @@spartangoku7610 boo

  • @Rog5446
    @Rog5446 3 роки тому +6

    Did anyone spot the mistake ar 5:45, when he said that the type 55 carries 84 vertical launch cells aft, but the caption said 48? (48 was the correct quantity)

    • @pauljeffs7
      @pauljeffs7 2 роки тому

      You are truly a hero. So glad you pointed this out instead of just watching the video like everyone else, equally as stunning as brave.

  • @Christopher_S
    @Christopher_S 4 роки тому +12

    I saw my name on the thumbnail and had to check this video out. Glad I did, there are some really great videos here.

    • @johnberry5275
      @johnberry5275 4 роки тому

      Anything you say, Mr. C[ur]S[e]words

    • @AuxenceF
      @AuxenceF 3 роки тому

      Welcome to the marine nationale

  • @maximusmurua4437
    @maximusmurua4437 4 роки тому +15

    Well the best looking one is the French Corvette; in capability they're all similar...

  • @nickkomen6210
    @nickkomen6210 4 роки тому +2

    I have no idea what's best. They all sound pretty dynamic in their own way in different scenarios

  • @wkent02
    @wkent02 4 роки тому +11

    Just to clear this up for anyone wondering, the naval speeds, operational ranges, and even armaments are usually classified information. The numbers and details civilians receive are the previewed and accepted numbers that those countries' governments are willing to share with the public. Meaning with the Chinese and Russian ships, they are likely to have much faster and wider range of operations than publicly available information would say.

  • @janvanvroonhoven3278
    @janvanvroonhoven3278 4 роки тому +258

    Even these ships will be given a run for their money ánd lives when they'll encounter ... The Flying Dutchman!

    • @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152
      @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 4 роки тому +9

      Technically the dutchman is a frigate, so send a destroyer and its done for

    • @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152
      @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 4 роки тому +1

      @andy zhang thats a movie, the flying dutchman was a legend for hundreds of years before the movie

    • @janvanvroonhoven3278
      @janvanvroonhoven3278 4 роки тому +9

      @@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 One small Dutch sub sank a US carrier, a cruiser, two destroyers and 3 frigates in one training mission (JTFEX / TMDI99). I'm sure the flying dutchie could deal with a random destroyer.

    • @janvanvroonhoven3278
      @janvanvroonhoven3278 4 роки тому +1

      @andy zhang Djeee, you actually believe in fairytal...oh wait, nvm!

    • @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152
      @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 4 роки тому +4

      @@janvanvroonhoven3278 dude, that sub was swedish and was able to do what it did because it was old. Anyway the flying dutchman isn't actually dutch, davy Jones was scottish

  • @tigerpjm
    @tigerpjm 3 роки тому +14

    "Hunter class will be built in Australia" - Shows New Zealand flag.....

  • @aquilatempestate9527
    @aquilatempestate9527 4 роки тому +12

    Good to see the Type 26 getting some respect, it is something of an underrated achievement in the UK.

    • @marpagapal3312
      @marpagapal3312 3 роки тому +1

      Once built type 26 will be the best war vessel in the world.
      For now that place is occupied by the type 055.

    • @hujiaming6151
      @hujiaming6151 3 роки тому

      Hahaha, I bet Argentinians would say otherwise.

  • @skizzik121
    @skizzik121 4 роки тому +29

    Wait no metric? I need to know wjat the conversion for 150 sailors is in metric!!!!

    • @andyman8630
      @andyman8630 4 роки тому +2

      multiply by 1.60934

    • @skizzik121
      @skizzik121 4 роки тому +1

      @@andyman8630 thank you!

    • @elias_xp95
      @elias_xp95 3 роки тому

      wait, why, what? 150 sailors is 150 sailors

    • @meowkie8549
      @meowkie8549 3 роки тому

      150 sea men

  • @bradz9413
    @bradz9413 4 роки тому +3

    Top marks for comparing it to the type 55 because that ship is the benchmark

  • @vancouverdude
    @vancouverdude 4 роки тому +14

    Good sense of humour with edit, "can shoot down helicopters" Marine 1, "can deal with small coastal ships", Cruise Ships

  • @asrielthespaceshiba7723
    @asrielthespaceshiba7723 4 роки тому +8

    Showing Battleship when you said 21st Century Warship
    Me : that's 20th Century Warship to be exact it has been built in 1943

  • @spidermight8054
    @spidermight8054 4 роки тому +5

    Great to see our allies developing badass ships! I’m American btw

    • @Triggernlfrl
      @Triggernlfrl 3 роки тому +2

      You mean vazal states because the US has no real friends any more....

    • @spidermight8054
      @spidermight8054 3 роки тому +1

      @@Triggernlfrl Yes. That, unfortunately.

  • @ottomaguire2443
    @ottomaguire2443 4 роки тому +7

    French Corvette sounds very marketable to many other nations which maybe its real purpose not too expensive while promising to do much in compact size Operation

    • @marpagapal3312
      @marpagapal3312 3 роки тому +1

      It looks awesome but there are no orders for it and it is doubtfull that shipyard could built them.
      It probably will stay as a mere cool render.

  • @RenatoGralhoz
    @RenatoGralhoz 4 роки тому +15

    The German MKS 180 is the most impressive to me.
    A gold mention to impressive design of French C Sword 90 and Swedish MCMV 80.

    • @archeopterix22
      @archeopterix22 4 роки тому +2

      Yep, i second that thought. The idea that you can fit that thing with different mission modules,store the ones you not currently need and upgrade them with the newest tech, makes them the most versatile, cost efficient and in the long run, the ones that can be upgraded with the lowest cost to current standards.

    • @jbmpr
      @jbmpr 4 роки тому +1

      The German is extremely underpowered... 0vls !? Check out the South Korean Sejong the great class. It's roughly the same price at 900M and it's a proper multirole platform.

    • @archeopterix22
      @archeopterix22 4 роки тому

      @@jbmpr If memory serves me right, the Korean ship is a missile destroyer. That's not exactly multirole. The MKS is a replacement for the Brandenburg class, it's main function is ASW. And it does have an MK41 VLS that quad packs 64 ESSM. I believe, the Sejong fits twice that number of some US made interceptors.

    • @RenatoGralhoz
      @RenatoGralhoz 4 роки тому

      ​@@jbmpr There is a dilemma today in every military forces: multirole x specialization.
      Its almost like JoKenPo hand game.
      I am trying to be easy to understand.
      Therefore the issue is not the money but the philosophy of each Military Forces.

  • @lucrolland7489
    @lucrolland7489 4 роки тому +5

    Very interesting program. The whole world is watching, so it would be nice if the measurements would be done in metric (SI).

  • @paulosullivan3472
    @paulosullivan3472 3 роки тому +1

    Personally I think the idea of modularity is greatly underestimated. The ability to have a ship which could swap out a damaged module for a working one and be operational again immediately is immense.

  • @alleweg000
    @alleweg000 4 роки тому +6

    "Imagine an 8000 ton frigate that has no anti air missiles or anti sub weaponry... "
    Germany: "Hold my beer. Here's our Baden-Wuerttemberg class frigate.... "

    • @tomsmith2209
      @tomsmith2209 4 роки тому +3

      Wait for UK ships, the MOD's favourite phrase is "fitted for but not with"

    • @philippesoares1745
      @philippesoares1745 4 роки тому +1

      @@tomsmith2209 i heard that the new air carriers were almost defenceless. Did they get rid of some AA defence?

  • @martinmartinmartin2996
    @martinmartinmartin2996 4 роки тому +6

    A 100 fast and tiny patrol boats can attack with missiles while avoiding the immense defenses of a modern aircraft carrier.

    • @flfl3969
      @flfl3969 4 роки тому +2

      They have smaller speed boats that can go 45 mph and fire missiles and heavy machine gun fire. These smaller speed boats are armored and one could take out dozens of speed boats. The larger ships also are able to fire massive amounts of heavy gun fire.
      So it is highly doubtful that a 100 enemy small boats would ever get within range to even fire one missile.

    • @effexon
      @effexon 4 роки тому

      @@flfl3969 howabout submarines? are they still a thing or are those systems too powerful detecting and destroying subs in modern battlefield?

    • @flfl3969
      @flfl3969 4 роки тому +2

      @@effexon Submarines are by far the most deadly instrument of war in existence with the possible exception of stealth bombers. To counter this threat, carrier groups are escorted by submarines. The destroyers in the escorts also are very good and destroying enemy submarines.
      The sensors and various radars that carrier groups use detect threats several hundred miles away. It is very difficult for an enemy to get close enough to attack an aircraft carrier. The greatest threat are new, ultra long range missiles that are said to have a range of over 800 miles. However, these missiles are at best in development and have not been used successfully in battle. It takes multiple coordinated guidance systems to guide a missile accurately that far away.

  • @SergeyBerezovikov
    @SergeyBerezovikov 4 роки тому +2

    You know that when talking about Karakurt you showed the dimensions and speed on Buyan, right? :)

  • @felixschrider9037
    @felixschrider9037 4 роки тому +12

    "at Osborn naval shipyard": shows picture of NZ flag

  • @Dogeman131
    @Dogeman131 4 роки тому +3

    Zumwalt class destroyers: **am I a joke to you**

  • @videre8884
    @videre8884 4 роки тому +1

    Sending a warship to help in a disaster makes no sense, it would be better to send disaster protection rather than a warship.

  • @luismachado6264
    @luismachado6264 3 роки тому +3

    The sea sword 90 corvette would be perfect for a small coastal country like Portugal. 👍

  • @agwhitaker
    @agwhitaker 4 роки тому +6

    Incredible deceptive camouflage on these 'Deadly Military Ships'.
    Many of them look just like old retired WWII preserved memorials and museum ships.

    • @chriswhited
      @chriswhited 4 роки тому +1

      i'll assume you're just being sarcastic lol.

    • @agwhitaker
      @agwhitaker 4 роки тому +1

      @@chriswhited Mmmm.... a little bit.
      I suspect my cat could do better film editing.

    • @chriswhited
      @chriswhited 4 роки тому +1

      @@agwhitaker then we agree.......not sure what they were thinking past just being lazy.

  • @admonty75
    @admonty75 4 роки тому +4

    The Germany design is a great contender

  • @bowlampar
    @bowlampar 4 роки тому +4

    Packed with deadly armament is a necessity for every battle ship nowadays, so no one want to mess with you in high sea.

  • @paulwallis7586
    @paulwallis7586 4 роки тому +19

    Ah... You've got a New Zealand flag with red stars, as the Aussie flag?

  • @caseylimbert266
    @caseylimbert266 4 роки тому +12

    26 knots, that's a bit on the slow side, isn't it?

    • @davidandmartinealbon3155
      @davidandmartinealbon3155 4 роки тому +3

      Just a bit... There were 1st world war battleships that could outrun that

    • @caseylimbert266
      @caseylimbert266 4 роки тому

      @@davidandmartinealbon3155 Dreadnought could've

    • @heuhen
      @heuhen 4 роки тому +3

      nowadays you don't need speed, we have missiles for that, unless the ship is build for carrier escort.
      In the old days, you need speed, so you could catch up with you'r enemy and get your guns in range

    • @kevinyaucheekin1319
      @kevinyaucheekin1319 4 роки тому +1

      @@davidandmartinealbon3155 Actually no. No line of Battle Battleships of WW1 could exceed 26 kts. A few mid/late war 1 Battle crusiers could near enough but not dreadnought/Battleships.

    • @ryanhaggett6626
      @ryanhaggett6626 4 роки тому +2

      @@caseylimbert266 Dreadnought had a maximum speed of 21 knots

  • @da-bman919
    @da-bman919 4 роки тому +6

    5:47 did he say 84? As it shows 48 or am I missing something here? Just confused to what the actual numbers are for the aft tubes. Awsome vid btw!

    • @tomabenas964
      @tomabenas964 4 роки тому +2

      He accidentally said 84, but the ship only has 48 aft tubes. More in the front than in the back,

    • @deltavee2
      @deltavee2 4 роки тому +2

      @Glenn Bolger No time for retakes, let alone reloads - 48

  • @StephenRayner
    @StephenRayner 4 роки тому

    I think both are great! And what’s more great is the fact that both nations are allies!

  • @grnm2719
    @grnm2719 4 роки тому +5

    Could you use metric as well please. Thanks. Great video by the way.

    • @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152
      @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 4 роки тому

      In navys they tend to use imperial more often than metric

    • @grnm2719
      @grnm2719 4 роки тому +1

      SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 Not in the rest of world navies where they have been using metric since the 20th century.

    • @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152
      @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 4 роки тому

      @@grnm2719 well, in terms of weapon diameter atleast

    • @grnm2719
      @grnm2719 4 роки тому +1

      SDS Olympus Mons SWSC-1 I’m a fan of naval vessels civilian and military lots of navies used metric for armaments and vessels dimensions. Only the US navy used the imperial measurement sir. Get your facts right.

    • @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152
      @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 4 роки тому +1

      Type 45: 4.5inch mk8
      USS Arleigh burke: 5inch Mark45
      Hms vanguard: BL 15 inch gun
      KMS Bismark:15in SK C/34
      USS zumwalt: 6inch advanced gun system
      Kms Scharnhorst: 11inch sk c/34
      These are the official names for the weapons, notice how they're all in imperial?

  • @onecheman
    @onecheman 4 роки тому +14

    4:33 Arma 3 with mods sequence xD

  • @Kryder401
    @Kryder401 3 роки тому +2

    There is so much wrong with this video I had to make sure it wasn't produced by the Verge.

  • @joesky011
    @joesky011 4 роки тому +4

    One of the clips you showed when discussing the Australian frigate, you depicted an Australian flag. Trouble is, it wasn't the Australian flag...it was the New Zealand one!!!

  • @davidthomas6566
    @davidthomas6566 4 роки тому +5

    Type 26 all the way, so many different variants for one Hull..
    Swap and change weapon bays for so many different missions.
    Yes RN...

  • @cashcash5995
    @cashcash5995 3 роки тому

    All those Military Ships are good for bullying only , ICBM is a game changer .

  • @bamikroket
    @bamikroket 4 роки тому +11

    At least show the correct stuff in the videos while talking about it.
    There are so many mistakes here :P

    • @general_dude8025
      @general_dude8025 3 роки тому

      “Anti aircraft” *shows images of WWII Japanese aircraft being downed*

  • @bigtony4829
    @bigtony4829 4 роки тому +3

    Sweden is a dark horse ..They have some very nice stealth ships in the pipe line and their sub managed to " sink " a US Aircraft carrier in a naval exercise it was so quiet

  • @odindieudetout783
    @odindieudetout783 4 роки тому +10

    Les navires français c'est les meilleurs 🇨🇵🇨🇵🇨🇵 vive la France

    • @pxilant5031
      @pxilant5031 4 роки тому +4

      Translation: French ships are the best, long live France

    • @S-early-user
      @S-early-user 4 роки тому +1

      @@pxilant5031 American ships are the best best. But we're always ready to help out France! 🇺🇲🇫🇷

    • @pxilant5031
      @pxilant5031 4 роки тому

      Wow I hate patriotic people stop being proud of something you never helped in creating my god

    • @S-early-user
      @S-early-user 4 роки тому

      @@pxilant5031 Maybe you just have nothing to be proud of. What's this about not helping to create America? I'm an American. Nobody else does the job.

  • @planetnails100180
    @planetnails100180 4 роки тому +3

    I’m having a strange feeling like I’ve watched a commercial film...🧐as I want to buy some

  • @TcupsYorkiesAvailable
    @TcupsYorkiesAvailable 4 роки тому

    You have the best videos

  • @leomoran142
    @leomoran142 3 роки тому +1

    None of these ships are truly deadly at all. None of them have killed anything to date

  • @cherrypoptart2001
    @cherrypoptart2001 4 роки тому +1

    What about the Kirov heavy class battle cruiser? There's only 1 in service but 2 more are being modernize for deployment by 2025-2030. NATO did say these ship can project more firepower than the Iowa or any battleship. I think it deserves a spotlight on this list

    • @heuhen
      @heuhen 4 роки тому +1

      Old.... if you notice, he say they are talking about the newest ships, that are on the drawing bord....
      on side note, a single submarine like for example, the Norwegian Ula class, can easily take out Kirov.... but then Ula class was build for that, to make havoc in a fleet. Kirov's only advantage is it's size... so it can carry many weapons, it is a mobile fortress build to protect home waters with the ability to launch many missiles in a short period of time.... that size is also it biggest weakens....
      The reason Kirov class and the other Russian cruisers was build big, was due to Russian (Soviet) missiles during cold war wasn't as good as western missile that could be compact. so to compensate for that, Soviet Navy build ships like the Kirov that could carry enough missiles to overrun a defense system and at least a few of those missile would get trough... But then US-Navy developed Aegis combat system with the SPY-1 radar, that have the capability to detect and track multiple targets (in the hundreds+++), and suddenly Kirov advantage was gone.
      There is a reason Royal Norwegian Navy use an light version of SPY-1 radar on the frigate's.... for that reason, when you have a small frigate that can detect all your 100+ missile and can engage them all within 10 seconds + - ..... suddenly a big ship like Kirov is ...pointless, and the same frigate can deploy advance stealth anti ship missile in form of NSM/JSM.... and at there are no Navy that have defense against it.
      When size kills you! There is a reason Russia si building only corvettes and frigates now. And are planing a future Cruiser/destroyer to replace there aging cruiser and destroyers and one day Kirov class!

  • @NickNZ
    @NickNZ 4 роки тому +8

    So many errors in the commentary, that this has lost all credibility. Shows the NZ flag as the Australian flag. Mistakes 48 as 84, cannot correctly identify helicopters, etc, etc, etc.

    • @igorvyacheslavtherussianmu3142
      @igorvyacheslavtherussianmu3142 4 роки тому +1

      OH SHUT UP ARMCHAIR ADMIRAL. WHAT DO U KNOW THAT WE DON'T?

    • @igorvyacheslavtherussianmu3142
      @igorvyacheslavtherussianmu3142 4 роки тому

      AS FAR AS HELICOPTER IS CONCERNED, I ASSUME U ARE AUSTRALIAN AND THE HELICOPTER HE SHOWED WHILE TALKING ABOUT UR COUNTRY IS A MERLIN WHICH IS A BRITISH HELICOPTER. WHICH IS NOT THE ONE YOUR COUNTRY WILL USE, UR COUNTRY WILL USE THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER. BUT GIVEN THAT IT IS A BRITISH PROGRAMME HE SHOWED THE MERLIN MAY BE TO STRESS THAT BOTH COUNTRIES DESIGN HANGAR WILL CARRY A DIFFERENT HELICOPTER.

    • @hepburn118
      @hepburn118 4 роки тому +1

      (slow clap) Feel better now? Where would we be without your expertise?

    • @benbowland
      @benbowland 4 роки тому

      Also showed a drawing of Russia's Poseidon autonomous nuclear torpedo and labelled it as a "Anti submarine rocket"

  • @christiancadungog9416
    @christiancadungog9416 2 роки тому

    compact in size but dangerous, nice👍👍

  • @azsara7747
    @azsara7747 2 роки тому

    Can't say wich one of them is better. Every ship has it's own capabilititys and it's own purpose in order to fit with any country needs. Other countries need small vessels, fast and flexible while others need large ships in order to carry warheads.

  • @mrgary107
    @mrgary107 4 роки тому +1

    the ship "Poor Richard" # 6 suffered a fire for five days in San Diego Harbour. It is done and will never sail again, entire crew has been reassigned.

  • @Puzzoozoo
    @Puzzoozoo 4 роки тому +1

    The MKS-180 has had a whole raft of problems.

  • @peteralfredwallis8417
    @peteralfredwallis8417 4 роки тому +2

    The German and French ships look unreaaaal

  • @danp5073
    @danp5073 4 роки тому +1

    1 billion each? Guess it's a good time to be a landlocked country

  • @spidermight8054
    @spidermight8054 4 роки тому +2

    I sure hope these defense contractors have developed a reliable method to defend against torpedoes!

  • @SkydivingSquid
    @SkydivingSquid 4 роки тому +3

    Interesting that they didn't include the United States' DDG 1000 series, or even a DDG Type IIA.

    • @Wawrzyczny80
      @Wawrzyczny80 3 роки тому

      Because the DDG 1000 program has been cancelled

  • @chandlerkeon5049
    @chandlerkeon5049 3 роки тому

    Huh. Bunch of coastguard vessels talking about DEADLY.

  • @huseyin.fazlioglu
    @huseyin.fazlioglu 4 роки тому

    excellent narration

  • @KorbenDalasCZ
    @KorbenDalasCZ 4 роки тому

    why you did not show Admiral Gorshkov-class frigate

  • @Kainlarsen
    @Kainlarsen 4 роки тому +1

    These are fascinating, but also worrying.
    The Sea Sword is a bautiful ship. They all look great, though.

  • @kris220b
    @kris220b 4 роки тому +2

    Metric units please?
    Also, less unrelated visuals would be nice.

    • @ryanhaggett6626
      @ryanhaggett6626 4 роки тому +1

      Knots is the proper unit of measurement for seagoing vessels.

  • @MrJashei
    @MrJashei 3 роки тому

    love it talking about ship being made in Australia only to be showing the New Zealand flag

  • @S-early-user
    @S-early-user 4 роки тому +3

    No American aircraft carriers? That's just objectively wrong. There's not even a Zumwalt!

  • @VictorRegouin
    @VictorRegouin 4 роки тому +3

    Great video man! I'm not in the navy so will never be on one if this ships but in the army! I learned so much! I even made a video about the 5 life lessons learned in the military!

  • @aaronfarrin4057
    @aaronfarrin4057 4 роки тому +22

    I liked the look of that Saab its cool that they still make stuff I wish they made care still GM ruined that 4 everyone 😤

    • @davemingle6743
      @davemingle6743 4 роки тому

      Saab is very much hated in NS they screwed alot of ppls lives when they closed shop and left so I guess ppl should hate GM here too ... Go FORD LOL

    • @adamsoderlund7250
      @adamsoderlund7250 4 роки тому +1

      Saab still has a role in military development they just quit making cars it was a piss hole

    • @drakenfire2189
      @drakenfire2189 4 роки тому +4

      Not the same company.... They split somewhere in the 90s.....

    • @LNZT
      @LNZT 3 роки тому

      Exactly

    • @LNZT
      @LNZT 3 роки тому

      Our Swedish army and general is awesome!

  • @paulconnors2078
    @paulconnors2078 4 роки тому +4

    Too bad there were so many gross mistakes in this video: to include showing the Merlin helo instead of the Sikorsky MH-60R that the RAN uses or the flag of New Zealand for that of Australia. Also showing ships no longer in service such as retired USN battleships, Iroquois destroyers of the RCN (soon to be phased out completely) to name a few.

    • @ronjohnson1658
      @ronjohnson1658 4 роки тому

      yes too many basic errors get it right and do your research

  • @rupayanbandyopadhyay3578
    @rupayanbandyopadhyay3578 3 роки тому

    U missed the Indian Vishakapatnam class destroyer

  • @andrewheffel3565
    @andrewheffel3565 4 роки тому +4

    I like it when our allies arm up. Good job UK, Aus and Canada.

  • @glennsinclair3891
    @glennsinclair3891 4 роки тому +1

    5:32 What is the KGV class battleship doing here

  • @Winterx69
    @Winterx69 3 роки тому +3

    6:35 "and, if needed, to evacuate German citizens..." - shows picture of Munich...

  • @alindaderick814
    @alindaderick814 4 роки тому

    Nice got to subscribe 💪

  • @hardline5889
    @hardline5889 3 роки тому

    That’s why the American Navy is retiring all those new 6 year old warships, fitted with gasoline turbines and diesel generators. They have shown to host a laundry list of maintenance issues along with issues with the propulsion system

  • @JP-xn7si
    @JP-xn7si 4 роки тому +5

    Most deadly ships in the world and not a single aircraft carrier, right

    • @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152
      @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 4 роки тому

      Because its the aircraft and pilots that do the damage not the ship its self

    • @JP-xn7si
      @JP-xn7si 4 роки тому

      @@sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 Aircraft are the weapons of a carrier.
      That's like saying it's the missiles doing the damage not the actual ship

    • @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152
      @sdsolympusmonsswsc-1152 4 роки тому

      @@JP-xn7si nope, its not because if a missile gets shot down, you just launch another but if a plane gets shot down, you've just lost a pilot and $200million and then have to go thru the process of readying and launching another

  • @sav6732
    @sav6732 3 роки тому

    The Type-55 looks an awful lot like a Visby class corvette....

  • @MrTallpoppy58
    @MrTallpoppy58 6 місяців тому

    I think your numbers are a bit out ..... the cost of the Type 26 / Hunter Class frigates is between 5-7 $billion each. NOT $1billion.

  • @scraggs101
    @scraggs101 4 роки тому +10

    Wait.. If it's war why would you tell everyone what you are getting and what it dose?

    • @timothyhawkins2487
      @timothyhawkins2487 4 роки тому +8

      To distract you from the advanced technologies they really have it's all about deception of manipulation when it comes to the civilians of this world the technology they are showing you is by far and in fact very old for future references hope this helps.

    • @davemingle6743
      @davemingle6743 4 роки тому +1

      You said it right there as I said another way 😂

    • @davemingle6743
      @davemingle6743 4 роки тому +5

      @J S and USA is so broke it's runing on borrowed time you even couldn't afford a real president this time and had to hire a clown LMFAO 😂 if you yanks stop making so much trouble shut your mouths and played baseball countries wouldn't need war ships you silly twatwaffles smfh 😂

    • @thebikemike
      @thebikemike 4 роки тому +3

      All this military equipment is to prevent wars, not to make wars. They bring democracy and development to the entire planet!
      Thats what they say and if you think about it... Be sceptical and enjoy live 😎

    • @blackblood6148
      @blackblood6148 4 роки тому

      @J S thats why the EU concentrates on Multi purpose Ships they just want to Support the NATO where they are mostly just supporting american carrier groups

  • @MrYoshio14
    @MrYoshio14 3 роки тому +1

    That where the French taxes went lol

    • @valbat627
      @valbat627 3 роки тому +1

      no we can have the best social protection system in the world a good standard of living and be able to have the 6th army in the world 😉😉

  • @anubis9151
    @anubis9151 4 роки тому +3

    That german one looked so nice, I'm just so sad that there's so much focus on milatary and we disregard so much the devolopment of tech to aid mankind as a whole....

    • @2000un2000
      @2000un2000 4 роки тому +3

      Since the dawn of time mankind has been making technological advances through military development

    • @SBCBears
      @SBCBears 3 роки тому +1

      Far more is spent on tech to aid mankind as a whole.

  • @AchwaqKhalid
    @AchwaqKhalid 4 роки тому +11

    The Indians also have a good destroyer with Brahmos cruise missiles and Barak 8 SAM system 🚀

  • @Technoblade1704
    @Technoblade1704 3 роки тому

    I'm not sure how well suited ships are for evacuating Munich

  • @hikmahuddinhasbullah3928
    @hikmahuddinhasbullah3928 4 роки тому +1

    C sword 90 looks awesome😍😍😍

  • @dwayneheywood3496
    @dwayneheywood3496 4 роки тому +1

    All of those ships have its own advantage and disadvantages unless they come into combat that the only way you could know which is the better battles ship

  • @justman77.21
    @justman77.21 3 роки тому

    If these are the deadliest ships, how many kills do they have? And at what cost were their victories, that is, how many times were they crippled and how many lives were lost?

  • @seenyouyt6885
    @seenyouyt6885 4 роки тому

    Great animation

  • @pretooo
    @pretooo 3 роки тому +1

    well... as a German I was baffled to see one of our ships on this list. I mean, we our navy is (mostly) satisfied with ships able to move😂

  • @tonyhawk94
    @tonyhawk94 3 роки тому +2

    As a French, i think the C Sword 90 would be perfect for overseas territory defense especially in the pacific. And i LOVE the German MK 180 frigate, beautiful, big and powerful. The only flaw would be that it's costly and if one is sunk then your fleet is highly affected...

  • @no3ironman11100
    @no3ironman11100 3 роки тому

    "May be armed with lasers or railguns" wait what ? Only a few years ago they said it was too costly of a weapon to be viable ? hello ????

  • @charliecain1424
    @charliecain1424 4 роки тому

    really throwing shade to the zumwalt huh

  • @alexsolosm
    @alexsolosm 3 роки тому

    Really? You compare a minesweeper to destroyers and frigates?

  • @shirkedance
    @shirkedance 3 роки тому

    This Yatch comes with aerial Combat, Anti Submarine warefare, Modular Payloads, Sleek looks and can Hold Refrigerated Beers and Kitchen as Per international Standards.
    *Bruce Wayne* : Dose it come in Black?
    *UAE* : is there a Gold coated module?
    *Indian* : Whats the Mileage per liter?
    *China* : We can make it for 90% Lesser price !

  • @JoaoMariaNunes
    @JoaoMariaNunes 4 роки тому

    at 10.22 loved watching the F 334 NRP Dom Francisco de Almeida firing its guns...a Dutch Karel Doorman-class frigate that Portugal bought...

  • @benoitnadeau5845
    @benoitnadeau5845 3 роки тому

    Why this video does not talk about the second hand victoria class canadian submarines???🤔🤔🤔

  • @abhishekbabu2253
    @abhishekbabu2253 3 роки тому

    Make a video on INS Kolkata of Indian Navy or INS Visakhapatnam