Pyotr Velikiy - the largest nuclear cruiser in the world
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- Pyotr Velikiy (Peter the Great) is a heavy nuclear-powered cruiser, the flagship of the Northern Fleet of Russia. The fourth ship of the 1144 Orlan project (NATO: Kirov-class battlecruiser). The biggest battlecruiser in the world with a displacement of 26 000 tons, second only to aircraft carriers.
At the beginning of its construction in the 1980s, the ship was named Kuibyshev, and then Yuri Andropov. By the time it started service, it was given the name Pyotr Velikiy and carries it to this day.
The cruiser’s main objective is fighting the enemy ship groups, first and foremost the aircraft carriers, as well as protecting the sea from attacks. For that purpose, it is equipped with anti-ship supersonic missiles and a wide range of defensive measures against underwater, surface and airborne threats.
Thanks for watching!
When you visit Russia:
-Wow is that a battleship?
-No, that's a cruiser.
-Isn't that one is the cruiser?
-No that's a corvette.
-Wait, isn't that a corvette?
-No that's just Yuris fishing boat.
😂Under rated
Comment of the week😂
Is tzat a tank?no it’s babushkas lada
😂😀
Blyat!!
"the largest nuclear cruiser in the world" Yeah it is also the smallest nuclear cruiser in the world. It is the only nuclear cruiser in the world.
Random Person USS Long Beach was decommissioned a long time ago.
@@tongw082 pretty sure the dude meant Currently.
But is it the largest cruiser in the world ? then that would make sense, if not then too bad
@@12345fowler I mean it's over 800 ft, 827 to be precise, while the yamato was 863 feet, and the Bismarck was 823, so it would be long even compared to battleships, and heavy, light, and battle cruisers of this day and age are a bit smaller than those from the Sexons World war as with new technology, there is no need for size, I don't know about displacement though...
@@justafnaffan2.016 it is very light. 3 times lighter than the yamato and only slightly shorter.
"Which weapons should we put on it?"
"Yes."
"Yes what?"
"All of them."
"OK then."
Russian Navy General: "You see that empty space on that ship?"
Ship builder: "Yes"
General: "I shouldn't see it"
Okie 😁
Engineer: how many firepower do you want?
USSR: ALL OF THEM!!
USSR hasn't existed for almost 30 years, bro.
@ᜉᜒᜎᜒᜉᜒᜈᜓ ᜀᜃᜓ hahaha kabo
Alex Evert - yup, and at the time she was built,, 45 years ago bro, it was definitely still the USSR.
@@Pupda Too bad it wasn't USSR that was originally intended. When you know that communists were a minority in the Communist Party of Soviet Union long before that time, you can guess the whole affair is headed toward disaster.
Heneral, you made me think of the movie Leon The professional. Engineer: how many firepower do you want?
USSR: All of them. Engineer what do you mean all of them? USSR: ALL OF THEM!
This video in a nutshell; this ship is the closest thing you'll get to a battleship in the modern age. And you sure as hell don't want to piss her off.
Its hopeless....to bigger target plus to slow
@@diorocks5858 slow? It's the same speed as the USS Nimitz, similar to an Arleigh Burke class destroyer, to what ship are you comparing it with? An Aegis class cruiser? Even that speed is in the same range.
I agree it's the modern incarnation of a battleship. Unfortunately, just like a battleship it places all of its eggs in one basket and can do little that a fleet of smaller, less expensive warships can't. That is why most navies don't bother with large, expensive ships anymore. It's not like you need a 45,000-ton hull to support a 16-inch gun turret. A modern missile system can be mounted in virtually any hull, large or small.
The Kirov is more vulnerable than you think. The US Navy can easily destroy the Kirov. The Arleigh Burke destroyers and Ticonderoga cruisers carry Tomahawk cruise missiles that can strike targets from a thousand miles away. The Kirov would get sunk by these missiles before they even knew what hit them.
@@VinnyLam are you insane or you are just throwing things like that. What cruise missiles???...watch again video and watch it carefully.
This ship is what happens when you check every possible option on your planning checklist, it has more missiles than most missile cruisers ffs
Except it is a missile cruiser. Not a battle cruiser,
@Johnston Steiner that's why for modernisation they are turning the 20 launchers for Anti-Ship missiles into 80 UKSK 3S14 VLS that can launch Land Attack and Anti Ship missiles (Kalibr and P-800 Oniks). and the Ships will carry at least two types of missiles anyway as Air Defense missiles will always be present (otherwise the ship is a sitting duck) so the Russians put them in their own launchers.
same thing is being done in the Project 949A subs they have 24 Launchers for same Anti ship missiles that would be transformed into 72 UKSK launchers wich will give the subs land attack capability + the anti ship capability
@@tunisiandom9318 sounds lovely! Nice info.
@@thunberbolttwo3953 "Do you want me to put a sign on it in fifty languages, "I am a missile cruiser, not a battlecruiser, please don't shoot at me"?"
ya and he forgot the AK-630 CIWS systems of which it has 8.
How much Missles do you want?
Pyotr Velikiy: *YES*
**missiles*
A total of 352 surface to air missiles. 😲 Most countries don't have that many. Makes me wonder: when the Nakhimov returns to service next year replacing the S-300 with the S-400, and the P-700 Granit with 80 VLS cells, what will the final missile count be?
@@imrekalman9044 yes
@@imrekalman9044 yes(2)
@@ulfenburg7539 , Shiroi I know. 😁
Notwithstanding its combat capabilities and limitations, can't we all just agree that it is one gorgeous looking ship?
Yep
Yes it is
agreed
One of my all time favorites, even during the Cold War.
Agreed, it's like what a modern battleship would look like
Credit to the Russians where due, she’s a beautiful ship 🇬🇧 Edit: Slava Ukraini!
I second that she’s a beauty.
I say 3rd for that she is indeed a one of thekind beauty but beast inside and outside with her monstrous weaponry. I wish we could see all of them side by side sailing through the vast ocean surface.
She is a beautiful ship but alas Soviets deserve the credit....yes nitpicking.
I think All large ships are beautiful no matter what their problems make be
Stunning. We were berthed across from a Russian warship at Navy Days in Belguim and it was sexy. Small, stinking, but bristling with weapons and looked great. We were a Type 42 Destroyer. Beautiful in our own right as we were a Batch 3 (HMS Gloucester). Arleigh Burkes, Type 23 Frigates and Tico class are the other best looking. We deployed with a French Lafyette class (stealth design) and that looked pretty good as well. I served on two Type 45 Destroyers and they are pretty gorgeous as well.
As a US sailor, I have to say that is one beautifully designed ship!
As a ex Royal Navy (UK) sailor, I have to agree! (Would love to know what the mess decks etc. are like and how life is for those serving aboard.)
First of all thank you for your service. Second of all, you got to admit it would have made a beautiful Target for one of our Ohio class or sea wolf class submarines
@@brettschmeisser2568 Without a doubt, Brett!! I don't she woulda had a chance against a Seawolf ... and an Ohio class boomer would never let herself be found by such a surface noisemaker.
Read John 3:16 🙏
It's still is today for you?
Best looking "modern" ship that's for sure.
new 20350 Admiral Gorshkov class are also damn beautiful ships
this “modern” junk is 30 years old
@@RedboRF damn, those ships are gorgeous
@@molfar9049 shut up
@@molfar9049 like most modern ships, because its a waste of resources to develop new ships every year and its better to improve / retrofit relatively old ones
“Battle cruiser“that is the coolest name for any warship ever!
Even a Klingon Battle Cruiser. ua-cam.com/video/5SWh7cKRenc/v-deo.html
On The contrary, during ww2 in Pacific when Battleship no longer really mattered they were great option to escort carriers as battlecrusiers were fast and their lack of armor or weaponry didn't matter. And their armment was enough to be a great coastal support. Ironically Kongou Class Battalcrusiers made more war impact then mighty Yamato Class or more obsolete Ise Class and Fuso Class. Furthermore, despite Hood being Battlecrusier her strength was similar to Bismarck (tho by sheer luck of Bismarck crew she was hit in weak spot and ammo detonated)
Battlecrusiers were more economical in case of oil then battleships. And they didn't have to fight against battleships as there was better alternative - using aircraft
@JAG but in one thing u are right. The war on Pacific wasn't fought with Battlecrusiers and neither battleships. There were little flights between those capital ships. It was determined by aircraft carrier, submarine, crusier and destroyer. And u can see that in modern warfare as almost no one uses battlecrusiers and battleships.
No modern ship today is cooler than the kirov class battlecruiser the only ships to compare are the Iowa class battleships which are also very cool as well
Of all cruisers the best looking one for me is The Kirov Class. Honestly an awesome ship.
odegaard I choose the Kirov yeah sure it’s really heavy but it also has lot’s of firepower
@Steve Arthur Conversions, but yes. Cruiser hulls.
@odegaard I suppose it depends upon the need and application? Fleet air defense? Two Slavas.
If you understood how her weapon systems and sensors work, you would not be impressed. They were ho-hum in the 1980's as these ships built and they have been upgraded with stuff from the 1990's. Just about any 6,000 ton frigate in service today could take it out and not sweat being hit return because the Russian ship can't see beyond the horizon.
Kirov reporting.
-is a battleship
!
-No comrades, this is just a cruiser.
Russia, St. Petersburg 1991.
Before or after Christmas '91?
Now that’s what a War-ship, should look like.
Like the old times
@@Matias-ee9zy ye lol
You’re probably right about the incoming missiles, She just looks bad-ass.
@Jan-Ola Ellingsen no need to add ''nazi'' to german battleships, nazis were the hitler's party
@Jan-Ola Ellingsen yeah, even tho prinz eugen is not a BB, it´s a Heavy cruiser.
"Battlecruiser operational"
"Set the course"
"Make it happen"
"Engage"
that cruiser is flying
@@freedom341 so,and wenn flying. -- flying away!
Starcraft
“Kirov reporting.”
Kirov class reporting
Th engineers did great work. Although she's huge and armed up to the hilt, she is still elegant and beautiful. I hope at least one of the others makes it back into service.
The more artificial reefs the merrier....
Admiral Nakhimov, the 3rd ship of the line, has been laid up since 1999, but in 2014 they resumed maintenance and upgrades on it.
It has been in this deep refit at the dry dock at the Severodvinsk shipyard in Severodvinsk, Russia. It is currently nearing completion and it should be floated out of the dry dock in the coming days! So there will be two Kirov Class Battlecruisers once again!
Also, on a side note, the new and very secretive submarine Khabarovsk has been under construction in the warehouse behind the Admiral Nakhimov. Now that the dry dock's basin has been flooded, we can expect that to be launched in the coming days as well. It is rumored to carry 6 of the Poseidon strategic nuclear torpedos.
Imagine if russia had like 16 of these and like 3 aircraft carriers and some supmarines too
@@thomasvandenhurk8651 was planned to build only 7 of them
There are only two of these ships in service of the Russian navy, one is this, the other is re-stocking it, but it is not known when it will be back in service.
Russian Warships aren't usually attractive designs. This is an exception..Beautiful warship
their silhouette is so gorgeous
*me who likes most russian warships* Hey! what abut the slava class.
I like the lines on most more recent Soviet and Russian designs. Even some of their older cruisers, like the Kresta and Kara classes, despite a very busy exterior, don't look too bad. Their destroyers, at least up to the Udaloy class are pretty ugly though.
Maybe in appearance. However, due to Russia's world renowned maintenance of their military equipment, you would have to pay me a significant amount to sail in it for even a day.
As far as brown Water Navy's go I guess! 🤣
Finally, someone pronouncing Russian names right
Great content, mate
because he is Russian
@@NotTheLastOne ah, fair enough
@@NotTheLastOne if so, then best compliments for his English )))))
I think the author is Russian, as he has a strong Russian accent too.
I've always found this cruiser most impressive, it's like a modern day Battleship.
Beautiful ship, worthy of the Navy of the Russian Federation!
Well, they DO have a rather motley navy....
It mixes in well with the other old antiquated ships and is just great!
Thank you very much dear James ! By the way please check the modern Russian ice-breakers ! Really impressive ))
@@tolmie1141 Ohio, Arleigh Burke, Nimitz and lots of US ships are older than this cruiser. And Russia has got projects 22350, 20380, 22160, 20385, 22350M, 23900, 20386 and lots of other new ships.
To me, Peter the Great, as well as all of the Kirov-Class, are some of the most beautiful ships to ever sail, a close second to the Yamato-class. Could stick a few more guns on there though.
I don't think you could efficiently. I mean you can stick a gun without the ammo load and the whole under deck part but that would be decoration. under the deck they don't have enough space for more weapons or loaders. if they had they'd use it for more refrigirators for more autonomy at sea or fuel for generators/helos or ammo.
well, as we are speaking of russians, i'm sure someone has considerd sticking some tank turrets to the deck, like they did with their river monitors (although i do agree with kirov being second to the yamato, i wouldnt say its in terms of beauty, but in terms of raw destructive power, i think in terms of looks many whips actually beat the yamato, richellieu, dunkerque, scharnhorst, bismarck, or even hood do outshine the yamato, when it comes to aesthetics, but thats just my opinion)
The Yamato was cool, but not as pretty as the Iowa, in my opinion. The Iowa was much sleeker and nicer looking. There’s something about that sharply curved and raised bow that I really like.
@@thereyougoagain1280 If sleek, beautiful warships won wars, we'd all be speaking Italian.
c s maybe, but fortunately, warships that actually do their jobs well along with sufficient air cover and competent crews win wars.
Good lookin ship. Gotta break through that thick Russian ice somehow 😂. Much love coming from USA 🇺🇲❤️🇺🇲❤️🇺🇲
@El Hermano why is that bad? Atleast he isn't a warmonger like allot of idiots I see on these kinds of vids
Thank you very much dear Cameron ! Also, love from Russia to you )))). By the way please check the modern Russian ice-breakers ! Really impressive
It is an absolutely beautiful cruiser. Russia makes awe inspiring ships. It reminds me of small pocket battleships.
It would be interesting to see if they could be brought up to date technologically and if latest reactors and latest computer and automation could reduce the number of sailers required to run the ship.
It’s been a long time since thenUS tried to make good looking ships.
A correction, Soviet Union was making those ships. Russia is using them, as all other progressions which were made in UDSSR. Todays Russia is not comparable to UDSSR, this is much weaker state in many aspects.
Well...... same people and I would call them Russian always. Soviet was a political ideology that was Russian. The US Americans of today are not even remotely the same as Americans in the 1930’s -1980’s. The majority in this nation are ignorant of reality believing the leftist movement is the moral equivalent of god.
@@bret9741 The 3rd Kirov, Admiral Nakhimov is undergoing upgrades for years, supposedly will return to service in 2021, then Peter The Great will receive those upgrades. Hard to tell exactly what they'll be like, but looking at their new, smaller ships (frigates Adm. Gorshkov and Adm. Grigorovich, the tiny Buyan-M corvettes) the word badass comes to mind. So far what I've heard is that the 20 P-700 missiles will be replaced with 80 VLS cells for Kalibr/P-800 Onix/Zircon missiles, and the S-300 Fort replaced with S-400, possibly S-500 system. The Adm. Gorshkov is already using the S-350, which is literally the S-400 minus the longest range radars and missiles.
@@heardistance, today Russia uses new technologies, developed after treason in the USSR in 1953 and managed disassembly of the USSR in 1953-1991. So one of the cruisers is undergoing modernization and it will get all necessary upgrades.
@@TheRVSN Blah Blah Blah... im Russian, i know this words value... its nothing. The second one is already 7 years in refit and still nothing happened. Build 1986, this is scrap and no serious threat.
*Modern Warships* brought me here 🎮 📲
Yep
@@rupindersinghc too bad, I only bought its sister ship, Admiral Nakhimov. Coz you know...dollars rather than gold.
This is the best interpretation of what a Modern Day battleship could be. A very beautiful vessel of its time.
"Everything can be combined in one"
The Kirov-class battlecruiser in a nutshell
now lets give it a flight deck for fixed-wing crafts
@@My-nl6sg nah. leave that task to the Kiev class Aircraft Carrying Cruiser. Sadly...the Kiev's career was short-lived. One was abandoned in China, another being a tourist attraction, the third being scrapped and the fourth was given to the Indian Navy, modified and renamed as the *INS Vikramaditya*
The best and greatest warship still in existence!
even aircraft carriers dont stand a chance. unless a US carrier fleet is there. which would mean the kirov would be shipwrecked
Nice system I'm Impressed from the USA. The extra plating strap on the hull is used from our old Battleship design for the torpedo strikes. Damn I like the alternative power backup design in the Engineering section.
Feels like a combination of bismarck, iowa and yamato
and a whole lot of missiles
actually it doesn´t, only thing it may look like they it´s the size, but it is half the weight and only has 2 130mm "main battery" guns, it has a lot of missiles that´s true, so maybe with the later version of the Iowa
Considering it only has one thing in common with any of them, I will say no.
I love this ship, its design is so cool, this would have been small compared to the old battle ships but compared with todays ships its massive, no country would build them so big today, their to expensive, you could probably have 3 even 4 frigates for the price of 1 kirov class cruiser! Im British and would love this ship in the RN but it will never happen!
That is a multiindependent missile plattform guarded by torpedoes, rockets, a gun mount, several helicopters and 744 sailors. What a piece of machine. Truely a masterful piece of engineering.
Not like anybody cares but my dad served on CVN-65 in her final years
Thats cool
USS Enterprise CVN -65 the second “The Big E “! Enterprise Class ,
motto,“We are Legend;
Ready on Arrival;
The First, the Finest;
Eight Reactors, None Faster”
Her replacement, CVN -80 Gerald Ford Class , USS Enterprise
USS Enterprise CV-6 , The First “BIg E “ ( The Grey Ghost ) most battle stars than any other ship .
USS Enterprise goes all the way back to the Revolutionary War !
Even when Benedict Arnold commandeered a British Naval ship in Quebec he renamed her Enterprise!
You're right, no one gives a shit.
The fact some people are saying ok kewl but some are like yeah nobody gives a flying cock-a-doodle pickle
I do care ! I would like to thank him for his service !
"So Comerade... What kind of weapons should we put on this type of ship?"
"Yes!"
Oops, I meant QUALITY weopons....ah...zero?
So, Murica, they currently have hypersonic cruise missiles. Yes.
Just another Moskva.....
I wonder if it sinks as fast as the Moskva
I dont think so
from the uk i love everything about this ship it is incredible well done russia
Thank you very much dear Sentinal )))
What a beautiful ship
I mean look at those lines
I have built the „ex-Frunze / Admiral Lazarev“ in 1/350 recently - an extremely impressive ship!
This looks like a really impressive ship. It seems to have everything you would want to win a war.
The Russians seem to have made the ultimate battle ship.
However, remember the Bismark.
All it took was one torpedo from an obsolete wood and canvas aircraft to disable her; and then a fleet of minor destroyers and other ships systematically reduced her to a hulk on the bottom of the sea.
Also, remember the Yamoto.
So it would seem that the moral of the story is not to put all your eggs into one basket. The cockroaches of the sea will get you.
Funny and witty comment! I just had to reply good sir!
I could almost see the British Royal Navy wheeling out its WW2 Swordfish torpedo bombers from the museum and redeploying them again on its new carriers as an effective counter against the Russian Kirov class nuclear cruiser.
Bismarck and Yamato did not have on board the s-300, sonar, torpedoes and helicopters against submarines. Your comparison failed. Yet Kirov is protected from all sides, from the air, on the water and under water.
@@ХРЕНОРЕЗ moskva had s300 and all that...where is it not
"Fleet of Minor Destroyers & other Ships"
Oh yes, the minor destroyers *The HMS Nelson & Prince of Wales*
A few years ago this ship docked in Cape Town harbour. It had to get a permit from the SA national nuclear regulatory board to come within the metro's limits. It truly is a massive ship you can easily spot from the M3 driving in or out of the city.
Wait when was this?
@@someopinion Check online. There's a few photos of it.
@@Waldemarvonanhalt ok thanks👍
Seems like this type of ship should follow a carrier.
Nope. It was design to destroy carrier groups like used by USN.
carrier is more so for ground invasion
the Velikiy is a lone wolf interceptor
with enough anti ship missile to sink entire fleets
it also has the most advanced CIWS in the world making it untouchable
it's built to hunt ships not defend
@@ryanflorian2047 Yes yes Titanic was unsinkable too, lol!
@@ParaPanos Well believe the delusions if you like. We can easily proof read what carriers are in fact for and it does not mean ground invasion. So you had no idea what is what, lol!
Tell everyone here how will it take on one of our Perishers? No navy has detected one in over 70+ years now. We could be drilling holes in the hull without them knowing. Didn't think about how all CIWS and missiles cannot touch something under the water?
Remember it's designed to hunt ships ... not boats. ;-)
False claims never work out as in the case of the Titanic. You may as well claim the world is round or something, lmao!
@@MrFlatage with the 90R1 "yes missile can go under water"
cdn5.img.sputniknews.com/images/105514/45/1055144551.jpg
kills any torps threatening her
RPK-8s can respond in 15 secants of witch it has several
so you would need to get within 600m to even have effective fire
(and thats with a 50 knot torpedo and only if the ship is just sitting around with its engine off)
kind of sounds like suicide getting that close when active sonar can find you from close to 20km away
I always waiting to see this 🇷🇺Destroyer, this ship can win in 🌊Sea Battle..
I see the ship once ! Beautiful ! It’s accompanied by submarine and carrier with same equal power. It’s scary thinking of what they can do on blueprints and NATO have no counterpart!
Peter the Great. Damn nice looking ship.
Nuclear powered? Cool
Bringing back a Battle Cruiser? Awesome
Various capabilities against all kinds of warfare? Hell yeah
Still keeping a classic warship design, modernize it, and making it look sleek and badass? FUCK YEAH!
It's a missile system that comes with a ship attached to it,have to admire the way russia does things, that is one nice ship
A 10 of the sea
I saw the kirov while being marine conscript in the atlantic,Really impresive,beautifull beast.
How many missiles it has?
Russian: YES
Equipped with Stalinium armor, Soviet stronk
Russian version of SNL skit 'Cowbell...we need more cowbell'.
This ship was designed to take out US carrier battle group. Even if it can't , I still won't want her wandering around mine.
Technically it could: 1 P-700 with a nuclear warhead the deal is done. nothing anyone can do vs a 3.5km radius ball of fire, EM Pulse and nuclear waste (if nothing else, no electronics will be operational after that).
Don't worry man, its destiny will be like Yamato Battleship sunk by United States Fighters.
@Steve Arthur No doubt. It would be all they could do to prevent it from sinking. Combat operations would be impossible.
@@thetopsecretpentagonsclass6350 , and your destiny is to continue your career.......as the youtube....... village idiot.
Pyotr is capable of over whelming fleet defences
What an incredible and beautiful ship!
Pyotr Velikiy can only achieve it's top speed by using the reactors and boilers at the same time. The propulsion system is referred to as "CONAS", COmbined Nuclear And Steam. It can sustain a 20kt top speed under nuclear power and 31kts under combined propulsion.
Yep the Russian military turned out to be the joke of the world getting their butts kicked in Ukraine. This ship looks like the one that Ukraine a country with no Navy sank with their homemade missiles. Literally no country is afraid of them. Finland would destroy them in a conventional war. They are laughably weak. Against the US they wouldn't last hours. Any country importing their weapons has to be seriously considering switching to another source.
The ship they sank was the varyag class ship preferredly weaker than this ship aka nakhimov and pyotr veliky
Turned out to be joke lol you might cry when I show you the bodies of the ukrainian naziz
Dude, I don't want to make you sad, but this ship can turn whole Ukraine into the ashes alone :( That Varyag class ship (Moskva) was a huge cruiser but not the biggest.
@@CenabNagiyev its sunked because internal damage caused by crew mistakes
@@irfan_syah5993
Not really
it would be a shame if Ukraine sank this one too
The best cruiser in the world even it cost alot to operate
So, what should we equip this ship with?
Yes.
"Deal with any opponents it can meet at sea"... Kirov, id like to introduce the sea wolf. You two play nice
This thing is pretty legit though, for non-carrier surface craft. Props to the Russians on that one
Because naturally, being only human, they would have no knowledge of Sea Wolf, no access to the internet and/or a formidable education equivalent to yours on UA-cam, and no inclination to adapt. The old mantra "if you build a better mouse, they'll build a better trap" naturally wouldn't apply...because they're only human and would have no basic human ingenuity.
So... "how many missiles you want?"
Answer: "yessss!"
And there it was created
THAT is one hell of a nice Ship, VERY impressive!
what a badass vessel, hopefully the liders will recapture the essence of the kirov
This sounds like skyship engineering
Kirov reporting 🤣
Now this is a beautiful ship.
I think this type of ship would be very useful for any navy.
I can't wait to see what Admiral Nakhimov (hopefully I spelt the name right) looks like after extensive modernisation. Then when Pyotr Veliky goes for her turn, she might be equipped even better with the S-500 batteries, although that's just an assumption.
In any case, these two warships are already amazing, they should be serving maybe 2 more decades until Russia can roll out out of their shipyards the hefty Lidar class stealth destroyer-cum-cruiser or whatever class of warships they're called. They don't need aircraft carriers. They just need to be bullies in their own turf.
I don't think it will be done. Modernisation is too long, and probably can be kinda eternal.
@@PyromaN93, заместитель министра обороны осенью прошлого года сказал что "Адмирал Нахимов" вернётся в строй в 2022-м.
@@GeneralZadrot у нас чиновники много чего говорят, но мало выполняют
manutdhater, in the fall of last year, the Deputy Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation said that the Admiral Nakhimov would return to service in 2022. According to rumors, he will receive 80 universal cells for cruise missiles including Onyx, Caliber and hypersonic Zircon, and possibly up to 120 cells for the naval version of the S-400 and S-500 air defense / missile defense systems. A powerful ship will turn out. I also want to see this monster :)
@@PyromaN93, свои личные предположения и ощущения не стоит подавать как факт. Масштабные военные программы во многих странах проводятся с задержками, но тем не менее вечно их ни кто не проводит. Крейсер "Маршал Устинов" тоже ремонтировали и модернизировали со смещением сроков сдачи, но тем не менее он уже в строю как несколько лет и бороздит моря и океаны.
I'm an American and I think it's safe to say we generally like Russia and welcome them as an ally and partner.
Amadey every Country’s tv hates USA because of aggressive government actions
Amadey Yea your leaders distract you with lies. Ours distract us with lies. If people are stupid they listen. If we meant you harm, you would be dead already. The truth is, we just want freedom to do business, eat and travel. Just like you.
Denizvardal We all have the choice to believe propaganda or no. Outside of Russia, you know where most Russians live? America. You think they will be happy if we kill their mother country. We had nukes 10 years before you. Are you dead? No. Our military could defeat the entire world together, I’d be happy to like a video with details on how, and do we? No. If we wanted you dead, you would be dead. Don’t believe propoganda there and I don’t believe ours either.
Robert and Grapes wow you guys really believed usa alone can defeat all countries together? Dude not all countries are show off like usa that’s why you guys think you re the number 1 and yeah usa is the aggressive one since jfk died (r.i.p) currently your president wants to start a war with china and sended a fleet there.. i mean wtf is that ? Also isn’t the USA acting like world’s police and invading countries in the name of oil & democracy? I am not saying usa is bad because it isn’t it’s just the companies running the whole country not the people. I don’t have beef with the people there i have beef with people who sending those young soldiers in to those kinda shits and getting them killed for their own benefits. So yeah i can say your politics are aggressive because people who rulling you
@@TheThaiLife "Our military could defeat the entire world together", the whole world except Vietnam. Just trolling, sorry)
"protecting from pirates in the gulf of aden"
oh my god lol it was this ship?? holy fuck.. those pirates.. how could they have mistook this thing for a cargo ship..
This channel likes it big, fast, and powerful 👌
Just one step removed from a battleship😊
The greatest missile warship of all time. There is only one thing to talk about Kirov class: missile, missile and missile.
Amanda missile.
Basically, a moving mountain, at sea.🏔
Pyotr velikiy was also the name of a Russian dreadnought too I think
For me It's about how you will destroy your enemy not by largest or biggest.
"How much firepower do you want?"
"Stop asking me the same goddamn question for the millionth time!"
-how much do u have?
The modern day Yamato.
Probably gonna sink like the Yamato 😂
@@jroses983 by Prop powered Dive bombers?
Obsolete upon launch?
@@Traumatree well, you have to take into Account that this is basically the only ship in the World NOT suffering from the Battlecruiser Syndrome, like sid in the video its heavily amored, unlike all the other ships in the World who only know how to give out punishment, not how to take it
@Relic22 Yesss, that's what I thought 💪
Maybe it will take over as flagship of the black sea. It would make a great target for the Ukrainians.
But can it stop a Rod from God falling from space straight down!
I get goosebumps when i think how the captain of the ship would say ...“ all men battlestations“ such a beautiful and dangerous ship.
@Julian McSweeney oh shut your damn b- ass up
F35b tax lighting gone
Can u imagine beeing a pirate, and seeing this rolling on the horizon....
Yeah, bad day....
Love these videos man, keep it up!
Love this video I have been sleeping on this ship and now I know so much about it 💪👍
I hope that when the last one of these is eventually pulled from service, at least one will be preserved as a museum
What a gorgeous ship, the Kirov is without a doubt a great warship despite its age.
What a beast, amazing
These ships are very good looking. The USSR/the Russians sure make some really cool equipment.
The worlds largest nuclear coral reef project.
Uhh. Sorry to break this to you, but, it's still sailing to this day.
Beautiful ship!
Because aircraft carriers are obsolete, these monsters retrofitted with drone swarms, hypersonic zircons, S350S, Pantsir and quadrupled magazines in place of Granit ought to be the way to go for Russian flagships.
Honestly, I never even knew that there were cruisers under way by nuclear power. I thought nuclear was only for subs, so they can run deep for extended periods, and carriers, which are so gigantic they need massive amounts of power. Very cool and informative video.
around 1956 the US navy has a nuclesr cruiser's too, the ship name is USS Long Beach, decommissioned in 1995
Yea our Pioneering Spirit has just conventional engines. But it can come along and just lift up those tiny carriers?
If you have read the schematics of those Ford class reactors? You would know there is no massive amount of power on them.
Another great video!! Keep up the good work brother
5:23 "The main threats to any modern ship are missiles and planes"
Or accidental fires, as they're otherwise known...
Over 800 feet of metal, beauty no doubt
That's a cruiser it appears like a battleship.
It's a battle cruiser.😁
How many weapons and equipment do u need?
Pyotr Velikiy: Y E S
9:37 like a tank against garden rodents :P
What a beautiful and menacing beast.... Nobody wanna mess with this cruiser.... Love from the Philippines
What ever their combat ability is, the Soviets always made the sexiest looking equipment. Like the Su-27s and Kirov Class. Pure eye candy.
I want to surrender just looking at it 😂🤫