The BEST ISO Setting for SHARP Photos!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 сер 2024
- How to take the SHARPEST photos possible! Understanding how ISO works together with both Shutter speed and Aperture will allow you to grab sharper, cleaner-looking images.
For more, make sure to check out the FULL LENGTH VIDEO! ▶️
#photography #cameragear
Anthony is still rolling to this day
😂😂😂
Some years ago, it was called "grain" and on the Ilford 3200 was absolutely wonderful ❤
Grain is king
Goodness I didn’t know ISO can make that much of a drastic change! Thx Dude!
In some cases it will make a huge difference, but it also depends on your camera! I recommend giving it a test!
It's not the ISO that creates noise, it's the lack of light. If you keep the ISO low in a dark photo the noise will still be there.
@@stretch90vice versa too, you can have a high iso with a ton of light and it still wouldnt be grainy
I have seen a lot of your videos but this is the best you have done!!
Love the video!!!! Keep up the great work! Your videos are the best. Really helpful.
I usually turn My shutter speed to around 80-150, Make My aperture small (or whatever you call it) and My ISO low (i prefer just holding My camera in portrait without a tripod for some reason)
Could you let me know me what the lowest ISO that you allow for portraiture photography at night or low light conditions?
Try even lower shutter speed if you can at around 60-80 and I'm sure you'll notice a significant difference. Personally I shoot at 30-60 shutter speed for low light conditions and the results are massive!!
Something you should also know about prime lenses: Unless you’re getting a very expensive one (Canon L series or equivalent) the extreme lowest apertures are going to introduce blurriness no matter the ISO.
nope.... maybe corners get a little less sharp... (even on cheap glass it's not much of a difference) but aperture never has anything to do with blurriness.... that'd be shutterspeed.... nor does L glass does anything special... the Original L Glass used a flouride element against flaring that was the only difference.... these days it's the Canon Pro Line.... most of them are Zooms... because very rarely will Professional photographers use primes
@@LoFiAxolotl If you’re talking about using the widest open apertures, it definitely does affect blurriness. My canon EF 50 F1.4, at F1.4, on my Sony A7riii, can not take a tack sharp photo no matter how good your eyes are.
Oh good grief. No lens, I mean no lens is tack sharp at it’s widest opening, f/1.4, f/2.8 or 2, f/3.5, or 4. If that’s the widest opening of that lens it will not be the sharpest. This is SIMPLE photography. The concept hasn’t change since that first photo was taken of the roof tops of Paris.
Here’s one to rack your mind over… not all colors of the spectrum focus on the same plain. What do think the purpose of multi coating on a lens is for.
@@ES-tr5no To avoid chromatic aberration. It's not an obscure concept, dude.
Great information 😊😊 thanks buddy.
Thank you Anthony! 🎉
Technically the lowest ISO(nativel is the sharpest ISO, in terms of resolution. However its insensitivity will cause the camera to use lower shutter speed, causing motion blur.
Therefore higher ISO (in moderate levels 400-1600), will have faster shutter speed, causing the subject to be frozen, making it looked sharp.
The ideal is to balance it. Like in the video, use supports like tripod. If do have image stabilisation and fast lenses, try training your hand to get the lowest handholding speed while retaining enough sharpness. Balance ISO, shutter and aperture, to get that optimal sharpness.
IK the struggle. My cameras max iso is 2000
Mein Beileid!
lolol
Before I have my R10 I could only shoot up to 1600 or 3200 with CHDK on it lmfao (canon 350D btw)
thnx for good input❤
Real, i compared my kit lens and nifty fifty. 50mm has way better low light performance
most kit lenses are f2.8-4.... most 50mm are 1.4 or 1.8.... so that's at most 3 stops of light....
Thanks ❤
I love using that extremely high iso as style 😂
Giving film grain vibes 🫴
@@the_cyantan it also looks like an old vhs/crt tv when paired with a bluish color balance
@@the_cyantan basically, low saturation, bluish balance, high contrast low sharpness on a pinhole lens cap 😂
The photos are still sharp. There’s just noise. Higher iso can allow you to get a sharper image rather than risking for a sifter image because you wanted less noise
Wee got a very good answer thanks anthony😅
Okay great 👍
What if you dont want that long exposure effect?
I think you should need help from light supporting tools such as reflectors, flashes, light diffuser, etc. if you want to keep the ISO as low as possible.
A faster lens is/might be needed then, but even they have limits. Or bump up your ISO setting. Use a flash. You need light to make a photography. Hope you understand what is meant by “faster” lens.
@ES-tr5no faster being low "number" f-stop. My lens has f1.8
and my fastest lens is a 50mm f/1.4 These numbers are fractions, 1/22, 1/16, 1/11, 1/8… 1/2.8, 1/2, 1/1.8, 1/1.4 Therefore 22 is a smaller opening and requires a slower shutter speed to compensate for the loss of light passing though the lens. f/11 is a whole one stop faster. This is the same for your shutter speeds. It half’s or double, 1/30 sec, 1/60 sec, 1/125 sec and so on.
If you don’t want a long exposure effect use a faster shutter speed.
Remember that depends on your existing light availability, your f/ stop setting, also know as aperture, shutter speed and ISO setting. One change in any of these settings, be it up or down, will cause a change in the rest of the others.
Did you notice your ISO setting are half’s and doubles too… 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600 and so on. Also, ISO means International Standard Organization. Not what he said.
These are the basic fundamentals of photography that have not change since 1826 when the first photo was taken in France by Joseph Niépce.
You want to truly learn photography and all its beauty, pick up a film camera, shoot black and white, learn black and white film processing and printing, see how temperature/time and your technique on how you process the film affects your negative affecting your photo
Also keep into account that the lowest aperture on your lens is not the sharpest.
SO you think that 1-2 stops you get from the aperture make a big difference? You can't handhold 1/2 second just as much as 1/6th second....
The portrait 1/6 I don’t understand because subject movement is also a factor.
he was trying to make the carrousel lights blur as they moved.
@@DaddyM7MD Yeah, but the person would move slightly too, causing not the sharpest image of their visage
@@Kids11111 true but it probably was a short exposure like half a second
My max is 6400
same
Same to me also
Bro you diddnt tell us the “best iso settings” in your opinion
I watched it three times thinking I missed it. I'm starting to think that this guy just makes videos and then adds titles on at the end that have nothing to do with the video to attract people to watch.
@@seaned8 hopefully not 😫 he seems like a genuine guy, but he owes us a answer now. People will start unsubscribing if people start click baiting like that 👀 I’m with ya though!
100 iso is the best for sharp photo as higher iso means more noise in the photo and you'll lose sharpness
Ich kenne den und dass ist kein clickbait.
Es gibt eigentlich keine "beste ISO". Zudem ist ISO100 NUR sinnvoll, wenn man ein Stativ benutzt.
Man wählt eine Verschlusszeit, mit der man das Motiv einfrieren kann und stellt die ISO dann entsprechend hoch genug ein.
Mit ISO100 ohne Stativ zu fotografieren verursacht in den meisten Fällen unscharfe Fotos.
Wer jetzt immer noch wissen will, was die beste ISO ist, sollte mal die Webseite "Photons to Photos" anschauen.
@@FakhriZ04 that was true 10 years ago but with ISO invariance in some cameras now, upping your ISO is not automatically detrimental. It's a tool that is valuable if you know how to use it.
Came here for valorant
I mean you explained very poorly.
Don’t be afraid to shoot with large ISO, as long as you have sufficient light, you won’t need 51200 of iso
Plus the noise will always be there, even in low iso, just have enough light to hide it.
Simple basic photography. What is with people? Maybe they should learn it on film first. This basic principle hasn’t change.
Why would anyone learning photography waste money on making errors on film (that you have to pay for) rather than making errors on digital where every shot you take is basically free? Use some common sense.
Like I stated the concept of photography has not changed. If you learned it on film you would be more conscientious of the film you’ll be wasting/cost and making more of the effort to learn and understand the basic principles. How about you learn the fine art and science of photography then apply the common sense.
@@ES-tr5noYou can learn the same concepts that have not changed on a less wasteful medium like digital. Don’t come at me because you can’t grasp the simple logic of it without engaging in mental gymnastics.
@@Kids11111 the laten image is not a wasteful medium, I dare you to get behind a 4x5 or 8x10 sinar and place that black cloth over your head, go though the process of the view camera and take one image, get the right exposure for the shadows and then develop that negative for the highlights and then print it… let’s see how much you truly know about the medium of the photographic arts and it’s science. Never the less it all started with film. Oh, by the way you can put a digital back on that 4x5 Sinar.