Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 бер 2019
- Dustin has been absent in the child's life for almost one year. Dustin decides he wants to be in the child's life but says he cannot afford to pay child support so instead chooses to cover daycare for the child. Sarah is now seeking child support and for Dustin to continue paying daycare. Will the court grant her request?
The judge admitted he was already paying more than he should and still raised it. That's pretty fucked up. I usually agree with her rulings but this was bogus as hell
It's Texas law that's messed. If the judge had lowered it, mom could have appealed. Dad messed up by offering paying that much. Even in other states, I've seen judges go with what the parents have already been doing even it it's more than what the calculations show. It's dumb; however, it that's what they've been paying without issue, that's what the judge goes with.
This is the first ruling I disagree with
This is why I only mess with MILF's.
Me too
@@beckyl9454 but now he doesnt pay daycare he pay cs . So now hes gotta get it ammended
I disagree with this ruling, the guy can't even afford his own place. This is crazy
Lew Lew Self employed and does his own taxes? He makes WAY more, trust me. I walked that road....,
Yea my ex made over 90k a year but is self employed so wrote off over 65k and taxable income was 24k. He travels, has a 30k car and always has new clothes. Self employed make way more money than they claim
@@MrsEJV he can quit his job and pay nothing work under the table it is his business
@@gokuvegeta7770 that's called fraud sir.
@@Turts-Mc-Gurts ITS COOL IN A REAL COURT OF LAW CHILD SUPPORT GOES AGAINST THE FATHER I SAY ITS TIME TO GIVE THE MEN A BREAK UNLESS THEY CAN AFFORD IT WOMEN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS AND IN MOST CASES GUYS GET PUT IN JAIL WOMEN GET A SLAP ON THE HAND WHEN ITS VISE A VERSA AND MOST PEOPLE KNOW WORKING UNDER THE TABLE WORKS BEST TO SPITE THE MOM DISSAPEAR AND LET HER BEAR THE FULL LOAD FOR WHAT HAPPENS TO GUYS
I found my husband a VERY nice suit at a thrift store for $15. Him having a nice suit is an absolutely ridiculous reason to think he makes more money
My sons and his wife Wr t to Goodwill for him a sport coat for a wedding. For pants & coat $12.50. The baby Mama sucks.
It is especially with 2nd hand stores out there
Agreed I went to a charity shop in the rich area of where I live and got my husband a very very nice suit for £20
I kind of get it. If you don't know enough or where to look, hearing he got it at a big discount would be hard to believe.
He should have used a condom.
😮 Wooooooooooow!! 😮
My mind is in a tornado of thoughts while my heart aches for that man.
How can a judge contradict they’re own words. You pay three times too much but legally pay some more. Unbelievable.
My heart aches for the kid. Kids who need clothes and to eat. Two parents made him and two parents need to care for him. I, the taxpayer, is tired of paying for irresponsibility. He goes to go out and get a new job. He has a kid.
This is where her experience in the court comes into play
As I watched this i saw the same thing I’ve seen in court while waiting for my own case to come up
Many of the dads make choices to keep their income low and make claims of poverty but can find the money for fun things. Things like vacations, dates, the bar, gym memberships, new cars.
But then claim being broke and can’t pay for the kids.
He looks to be in his 40s. He can afford to go out but can’t afford his life or any kids?
Something doesn’t add up. It just feels off.
But besides that point. He set a status quo. Legally she can ask for that to be maintained and for him to pay for his portion of the kids.
Just because she had paid while he was uncooperative doesn’t mean it was comfortable for her either. They didn’t go into it but she may have been struggling as well and needs help so she can house and feed the kid they made.
She can’t be on the hook for most of it because he makes poor financial choices. All of that is extraneous to parenting responsibilities.
Yeah... they did this man really dirty. He's paying WAY above his means in child support and is drastically sacrificing parts of his life to do it. He's finding roommates, shopping thrift whenever he goes out, and is eating TV dinners hurting his health. He did this because he felt like he needed to do more to make up for the year that he missed, but he only makes 24,000/year. Daycare is expensive, I get that... but if shit hits the fan and he can't find a roommate situation in the future, what happens then? If he hits any hurdle in employment or has a medical issue... what happens then? This was an extremely unfair ruling. The mother just wanted to hurt him at this point.
He’s lying
@@DCfan6767 thing about that is that the burden of proof is on the party attempting to incur higher payments. If he is lying and it comes out then that's what perjury is intended to cover.
Facts, and she still hasn't allowed him to see his son, c'mon now, the judge was being ridiculous.
@@Mooe-cb6bv How you know? She hasn't ALLOWED him to see his son? When she came to court she wanted him to pay to do so,her words he wants to be dad well he can pay child support. One has nothing to do with the other.
Exactly she is rude and still mad that the relationship is gone. I'm usually for these rulings but as a mother who was wrongfully everything done I have sat on both sides of to he bench and hate this for him.
45% is too much. And he NEVER said he was comfortably paying that amount. This is ridiculous
He was living with other people to make the payment, I don't agree with this, just because the lady said he was lying on his taxes, she can't assure that because she doesn't even know him, just because he agreed to pay that much to get some kind of right make it seem like not wanting to know anything about your child will do better for you
Having to eat off tv dinners is nbot proof he is comfortably able to pay all the daycare cost. Tv dinners are not a wel balanced meal. Hie health is going to suffer.
Hes self employed hes not telling the truth on his income as he would never survive
Unless you’re a multi millionaire I don’t think anyone could comfortably do this
IF that's what he makes a year
JUDGE YOU WERE COMPLETELY Wrong…he technically owed $350 but stepped up and been paying $855 why raise it any more? WHY? Good men don’t deserve that
The child support system in this country is a scam and needs to be restructured. It encourages family separation and is susepable to fraud. Maryland courts will make you pay daycare and insurance on top of child support.
Ikr, normally she's fair but this was just mean. This guy has one problem in his life and he's homeless....
He should have used a condom.
Sounds like the mother wanted to punish him for wanting to share being a parent... and the judge punishes him for volontarily sharing his salary...?!?!
As a woman and mother myself I must say this is INSANELY UNFAIR!!! Appeal, beardman, appeal!!!
He needs to immediately file for a reduction. He’s been impoverishing himself to provide support beyond his means.
The judge did reduce his support payments ❤
buy a safety pin for his zipper
No, he's already paying this amount. Were you watching the same show that I watched.?
@@sierraanderson8149and he’s living in poverty
I feel like he should be able to claim hardship. It's odd that Judge Vonda did this. It was bad enough that she didn't reduce it but then she actually RAISED it for the health insurance? That woman is getting him to pay the lion's share when he's not the custodial parent. That's so wrong.
I'm so glad I clicked these comments and see the same outrage I feel, myself. This was insane. Sure he was decent enough to pay that entire daycare cost...So WHY on earth make him also responsible for reimbursing health insurance? This rules was ridiculous and frustrating. She literally punished him for his decency.
Ever wonder why in modern day men dont want kids no more? This vile woman did this out of spite not love for the child.... and the judge said yea thats cool.....
@@themanwithnoname1839 Unpopular opinion here-
I always believed since women get the choice of birthing or aborting the child, with no say from the dad then it's only fair men get the choice of financially supporting the child. Takes two to create the child yet only 1 actually has any real say over the child.
So I don’t think he is telling the full truth. Because he does his own documents and works for himself it’s pretty easy to put how much you earn under certain amount. It’s also really odd that he makes right under $25,000 a year. It’s odd because a lot or tax and government assistance work for those under $25,000 a year because generally that is considered the poverty line. Etc. I just think something is suspicious.
@@wildfirefly22 the federal poverty line is like 16,500 a year actually. But you can still get a lot of other benefits from the state as long as you're under 25k. There's no way to know if he's lying or not though, could be. 🤷♀️ I still think he's paying plenty of support though even if he was fudging the numbers a bit.
The thing I don't like is she said she earns considerably more than him, and doesn't mention the hours she does each week, or how much she earns. Then it's daycare which means the child is in there while she works, so couldn't they come up with a custody situation where he looks after the child - not paying daycare, and hands back to the mum when she comes home, as the child obviously cannot stay over.
This goes to show, if you help out of the goodness of your heart, there will always be a way someone can screw you over. If she wants help, he should have told this broad to put him on childsupport INSTEAD of offering to pay such an outrageous bill. Reason being; No matter what they say, they WILL put you on childsupport and anything you do to help in the past will come back and bite you.
Feel sorry for the father and the way the decision was come to, he has pretty much handed over 50 percent all he earns and yet that still wasnt enough. Madness
That man's beard is magnificent
He looks like a warrior or viking
Damn right
I JUST saw him in the backgrund of the video i watched just before this one. First thing i thought was "oooooo! I hope i see HIS video!"
Its BEAUTIFUL!
His beard makes $24k a year on the side
@@benblazek3305 🤣🤣🤣
They did that man dirty smh 🤦♂️
I swear they did
I have been binge watching this. First time I really disagree with that woman sad
Sure did
Dealing with these BMTs
Right? You're paying 850, which is almost 3x what you're supposed to be paying. Now you have to pay 968. Why? Just because! In what world does that make any sense? He should be paying less with that income, but you know F E M I N I S M.
Wow, there’s no way he is to pay that amount on a very, very low income! My child’s dad makes $80,000 and he only pays $600 a month 🤦🏻♀️ I am baffled at this ruling and it’s not fair for the father whatsoever. The mother makes more money than him and he is trying to do right by his child. This is more than a punishment rather than a fair ruling for both parties. What a shame! He needs to have a second hearing with a different judge or get an attorney.
This was really unfair for this man. Just because he's paying that amount doesn't mean he's not struggling, which clearly he is.
Wow. And they wonder why a lot of fathers are scared to step up and try to be a part of a child’s life. I feel so bad for this guy.
Condoms
He got screwed. Seems unfair. Judge said he was paying it "comfortably" but he wasn't. He was living with roommates and eating TV dinners.
if he's living with roomates and eating TV dinners at his age.......
Exactly, thats not comfy living and did she even bother to consider if he wants visitation a stable place for the child to live/sleep? Similar life as mother offers? This is why fathers need to be careful, people claim that fathers get equal treatment but this case showed exactly the issues in family court. If he took her back because he was struggling could he get it to be calculated fairly? The mom clearly was holding money in with visitation, she said it and the judge didnt even tell her two separate subjects
Exactly.
This ruling confirms that "no good deed goes unpunished " especially when it involves a woman
Bingo!!!!! This is the first parent for me to hear… OUR SON!!!! Thank you. You can tell a lot about a person when they say the child , my child as to OUR child. No matter how bad things are with your ex you say OUR CHILD! This guy is a good guy. Judge what happened???
Texas law. That's what happened. Texas likes to screw fathers in court. Had he not agreed to that amount she would've only gotten the $355 because otherwise she has to prove that he can afford it. Which she can't given the cost of living. The court would've had no way to do that. But because he was bamboozled by this woman into paying that and has been for a bit that means the courts can say "You're making it work so continue to pay." What gets me is that she had the audacity to make him pay health insurance. She should've said that's too much hardship. Now because he has to pay that he will probably not be able to eat or pay rent. That will lead to him going homeless at which point he will take it to court and claim hardship. Whatever judge he gets will review Judge Vonda's judgment and tell her that she was being biased. You heard what she said. She said she had the DISCRETION to assign higher benefits. That means it's her choice. She didn't have to do that. She did that because he's the father. A lot of judges are in favor of mothers. Usually Judge Vonda is pretty good at being fair towards fathers but maybe she had a case that disturbed her right before. I think this one needs to be reviewed. If I were the father, I'd appeal the decision.
@@jessicaarmstrong5035 thanks for the clarity…. You solid!! Lol
I totally disagree with you Vonda, in the best interest of the child the mother should continue with paying the health insurance. Gracious dad is paying almost half his monthly salary. That was a very unfair ruling.
He’s been paying it.
Support Court with Judge Vonda B. what difference does that make he could have been selling off his own stuff to make enough to pay it and ran out, you took advantage of a man who didn't know what he was legally responsible to pay ,I have been getting child support for 3 years the mother owes me for 8 years over 30 grand and I would never expect her to pay over 50 percent of her income to catch up on back child support, if that was a real case it would have been a very wrong ruling
Josh Henderson It’s not a judge’s job to give a litigant legal advice. Him selling off assets has nothing to do with his income.
mike scott LOL
Support Court with Judge Vonda B. wrong it is the judges job when setting-up a child support pay schedule to make sure the payments can be met with the income of the person paying, this could never be a real ruling , I understand your not a real judge and these cases are just entertainment but you should at least try to stick to reality
this is seriously fucked up, ESPECIALLY after seeing how amazing and fair the judge has been all the other times, this was just cruel
I agree. I was shock when it was increased. Paying more than half your salary. He can’t even get a car
Prime examples how a generous man can gets srewed. That is all I'm saying
She only added in insurance which always make the parent not carrying the child pay back. Then she told him how to get out of paying that by adding the child to his insurance.
She is only doing what the law allows her to do. If the dad petitioned the court to lower the cs then she could have done that but since he didn’t she couldn’t do anything. And the person who pays cs always has to pay the health insurance,
I disagree with this ruling. He is already struggling to pay daycare, that he willing agreed to pay. Mom makes more money and should continue to pay the health insurance. Having the daycare paid for is a huge financial relief for her already. She can handle the $113 that automatically comes out of her paycheck
He may have been manipulating his income but this judgement is no fair. This man just like other guests should be allowed to pay the fair amount based off his salary. That's the $355
I don't agree with her judgement...
He is paying way more in excess of what child support would be calculated out to be...
Voluntarily....
Then she threw insurance on top...
He should refile for adjusted child support.. And base it on his income...
Goes to show... When you try to be nice
Someone's going to shit on you
I seconded that, This was a bad judgement. The judge should had lower his payment because he is paying more than someone who makes twice as much. This is why most men do the least to come out on top thanks for the life lesson. Now more kids are going to suffer because of this type of judgment.
Thats fup
With the excess of overpayment of his child support why is he having to pay for the health insurance? He's already paying the health insurance in the cost of the daycare. This is a prime example to him needing an attorney. I would have said, "no let me pay what is the state's payment scale based on my income."
It should be the simple calculation as usually mentioned. Its understood that hes been paying 500 per month over the estimate. This is a decision that warrants men going their own way and not having kids with women. And, birth rates are going down dramatically. Its a simple calculation for men to make such decisions in todays society.
The problem is they made a deal, he covers day care, she forgoes CS from him. If it was them splitting expenses, CS being part of that, the judge could have adjusted that based on his pay. He is volunteering to pay the higher FIXED amount of day care to not be in child support, VARIABLE. Since he is self employed, this may have been wise, even if he is filing taxes and actually only making that much, having that fixed expense and her having agreed to it, she can't keep coming back month after month saying he makes more, make him pay more and him have all that hassle and a accountant proving he did only make that much. Sometimes its worth paying more to avoid hassle. I agree that 1/2 your pay is too much, but he volunteered that and a court can't order you to un-volunteer and force you to pay less.
This is the ONE time I don’t agree with her ruling. He’s already paying 3 times his required amount so adding insurance was WRONG.
Agree
Go watch the episode with the pool guy, it's stupid.
I agree but I believe he was lying about his wages though
@@sheneathahollowell2750kinda late to the convo but if he was lying that should be its own case . her job was just to work with the info she was given not what she thinks it is. i do believe he's lying tho
The judge should be ashamed of herself for that ruling and disbared.
I like how the judge assumed he was comfortably making payments. If a judge has the power to just throw the guidelines out the window then how are we supposed to trust the laws and the rules that govern these things??
Comfortably making payments? I wonder what would indicate a struggle? Maybe he should relocate to under a nearby bridge
She kept asking the chick what she wants her to do🤔
She wanted the judge to bully him and this judgment did just that! 😒
I only started binge watching these today and this is the first one I think is really unfair. He was paying that 8something out of the goodness of his heart and now he has to struggle further for trying to be a good dad. I hope he appeals this and gets a better ruling. The mother is also horrendous to let this happen as well.
Same
Me too🎉🎉
I think it’s perfectly fair. He skated on his responsibilities for a year to lower his taxes thinking he wouldn’t have to pay as much in child support. He’s a grown ass man and you’re telling me he can’t find a job that pays more than $11.54 an hour? She got knocked up celebrating his promotion, and he dipped after he found out she was pregnant. I see this all the time. Men literally quit high paying jobs to avoid a court order, lower their income, get the bare minimum and then once it’s in place go back to his high earnings
@@theoneandonlymvd 🤔 🤨 umm yeah that makes no sense. If that was the case then all have to do is go back to curt & ask to increase in child support based on the new income.
@@millertime28290 it doesn’t make sense to you because you think oh we’ll just go back to court. Getting an adjustment isn’t that easy and when you’re “self employed” taxes can be reduced for literally anything. He’ll be able to write off the day care because it’s an “expense occurred in order to work”.
That mom was crap. She kept talking over the judge and taking cheap shots at the dad.
18 months old, that kid better be a rocket scientist.
Wow, so mom got what she wanted and got MORE money. Good lesson to learn, DO NOT start giving money or paying expenses until you know your rights and responsibilities. The same applies to visitation, get everything in writing so it is clear and there are no misunderstandings.
Naaaaaa the lesson here is for boyz to not get married and if they want kids just adopt period. In the modern era its to dangerous for us .
@@Markosam29 He didn't get married. It doesn't take a marriage to make a kid.
@@Markosam29 that was total nonsense lol tf does marriage have to do with anything about this situation 😂 if he adopted alone, you really imagine he'd be paying LESS to single handedly raise a child? So stupid 😂
Pretty fucked that the lesson is don't do the right thing until the government makes u cause if u do they will screw u. Sucks more that the owner of the page liked that disgusting idea
I’ve seen personally cases in Texas where the dad was volunteering a amount higher than obligated and the judge lowered it as it should be and ordered the mom to reimburse the dad. Point is this judge is full of shit on this case
She really could’ve dismissed this case. I usually agree with her rulings but this one was really mind boggling. Like I can’t understand why she increased the amount?
It's mind boggling that he said he wants to pay more than he has to and the judge let him? Some men want to take care of their kids. What's the issue?
So lemme get this straight, the dad pays the daycare fully and the mom was paying the health insurance fully by now he pays partially the health insurance and STILL the full day care? wow
@@minxymoo2325 did you even wat h the video? He was paying way more than he could afford and then the judge increased the amount to make it even more ridiculous...
Given he was ALREADY paying WELL in excess of what he is required, and given his income, making him pay the additional for insurance reimbursement was unfair.
This woman wants a 2nd pay cheque and not child support, her demeanour in the court shows that, especially when she wanted him to pay even more than what he owes, and the fact she’s upset he is directly paying the daycare rather than her!!!
I support and love this judge but this ruling is foul! To admit that he’s paying more than he should then raise it under the assumption that he’s been paying it comfortably after he admits to all the assistance he require is truly foul…
I can't believe the judge did that to him. If he was paying $200 a month to the mother in child support the judge would have made him pay more. He earn less but the judge is still going to make him pay more. When the mother brings receipts for items she purchased for the child that father has to pay for half of it. When the father brings receipts for items he purchased for the child it is a gift and he gets no credit for it.
The worst ruling I have ever heard. It incentivizes parents who do not have custody to do the bare minimum and does not reward those who step up.
I don’t think he should have to pay health insurance seeing he’s already paying so much in child care and that’s 45% if his income! So unfair!
2 years later, I really hope this father is doing good. This really wasn’t fair to the father to give up what little money he had.
Well thankfully the show is staged, these are just actors. That made me feel a lot better when I figured that out.
@@pamelaeiskina3838 I just found that out myself about a week ago. These people were just too crazy for me, but once I found out they were actors, I laughed.
@@katz734 even though it’s staged, it’s based off real cases apparently.
@@pamelaeiskina3838 They’re based off of actual cases so this did actually happen🤷🏻♀️
This Absolutely was not Fair! Cause he was already paying more than he should..
Hell what is she mad about most of these men dont pay that. He is paying the whole daycare
Tiffinee Brown not just men, my experience owes me over 30 thousand in back child support
Right! Tell me about it! My God🙄
I know I would be grateful for just the daycare payment my experience didn't have to pay backpay for 10 years cuz out of 5 of those years was in prison like why is that my fault but either way he hasn't paid for about 3 years so its not like i expect the help
He should file and just get it adjusted based on his income. That ruling was ridiculous
I’m floored. He seems like such a good man. My ex made triple, and I was pulling teeth trying to get him to pay LESS than that. She should have shut her mouth and let this man be a part of his sons life.
Looks like more scamming the father to me with a spiteful child's mother.
She wants him to pay for everything
porkbeats It’s sad. I wish some of these women didn’t do that. I have no kids so maybe I’m misunderstanding.
I don’t think she’s scamming him. His tax returns are obviously prepared to his advantage. And she knows he’s not broke. So legally he should be paying 20% of what he really makes not what he chooses to report to the government. And based on well common sense he’s scamming her. That’s why he agreed to the $850 a month. He can more than afford that. If anything based on his attitude it’s junk change to him. He should want to have his offspring live the life that he’s living. Not limit it.
@@d2dag5 since when does money raise the child? I was a single parent for years on top of years and it never took 850 a month to raise my lil girl. What does giving the mom or dad,(whoever has custody)more money do with the life that he's living? 50/50.
@@porkbeats the law says 20%. Point blank period. And I would think and hope every parent wants the best they can provide for their child. Yes you can definitely raise a child on a tighter budget. No argument there. But if I could afford to give my child what I never had and more I would. With more income they can join more activities and go to better schools- better daycares. It’s all about the child.
I disagree with the judge on this case. That man should keep what he is paying now. He should also have visitation rights in which he doesn’t. He needs a lawyer.
no he should not his obligation as far as child support is almost 2 times the amount he is supposed to be paying he should pay what is mandatory witch was the 350 a month and the 100 dollars on insurance women want the higher amount of course when they learn she is getting way more than she was supposed to be getting
@@gokuvegeta7770 Punctuation is really a great tool to use when you write. 😆😁😄🙂🙃😊
@Shanti David intelligence and understanding are tools sorry you were not born with either one walk in my shoes find out about me and my disabilities your so fast to judge have a wonderful day
@@gokuvegeta7770 i was not judging you. I was merely suggesting you use punctuation. And you immediately started to accuse me. If you have disability pertaining to punctuation, you could have told me instead of using accusatory tone. Well, this isn't important. Have a nice day!
@Shanti David no it's not my job to tell you shit you judged me you could ask before opening your mouth dont play innocent 💯
This ruling is... Just ouch. I had to see the comments to see if I was the only one who thought it was absurd.
I think what would of been more appropriate for him to pay is the child support amount that he should be paying (300 something) and health insurance. So it would be roughly $500ish a month? Idk I just dont agree with him paying almost $1000 a month when he only makes $24,000 a year, parents need food, clothes, heat etc too. I usually agree with Vonda, but in this case I do not..
Judge is bugging adding the insurance into his payment. He's already paying 3 times the amount the court would grant her typically.
Dude got ripped! He's already over paying thru the nose and then you add insurance, what the hell?
If you look at it he's going to just continue to pay the day care. So he's really not paying child support. He's just repaying the health insurance.
@@ayannawright6278 so what..he cant afford to live without room mates..not right at all
It's all good. He needs a lawyer and GeT his 12 days which affects support. Volunteer for childcare which reduces daycare ... visitation.
Basically get your ducks in a row before doing ANYTHING....
@@tiredofthebullcrap9382 I pay child support. The court under the law does not care about your living. You just have to pay.
@@who346 nope they can have it amended if he fights it and get a lawyer and if that does not work then quit your job she dont get shit and after a year go back to court and they have to go biased off of his income
Man is struggling, paying more than double his obligation, and has to pay even more. Shame.
I don't understand why she didn't just make his child support 400 plus the health insurance. This basically just made his life harder because he was a good person. Stepping up got punished 😢.
Why is the father responsible for “all” of the daycare? That’s insane!
He did that on his own, but I don't agree with the ruling. I think the judge should have dialed it back a bit.
Watching this show makes me glad that I got a vasectomy 12 years ago at the age of 30 I knew I wasn't about that child support life.🤣🤣🤣🤣
😂🤣🤣🤣
Smart move. I been tell my friends they should get one too because They have already have more then one child and some cheat too. 🤷 Just saying. The procedure is not even super expensive.
Lol, that was my 35th birthday present to myself.
That’s fairly young I feel like (they make women wait longer to have tubes tied/hysterectomy, smh) but if you know you don’t want any kids or anymore kids, that’s so awesome of you and I applaud you. Very responsible. My sister’s father is 53 and refuses to get a vasectomy, yet doesn’t want to care for the children he has or the ones that may come in the future
GUYS be smart and don’t get drunk and start leaving your seeds in the wrong land.
It’s expensive! If you don’t have money to support yourself and you want to avoid a case like this, don’t have unprotected sex, or have a vasectomy.
He’s comfortably paying already? He’s sharing an apt as a grown ass man
"Well you were happy paying 850 so why not 1k?" "No I was struggling to pay 850 in the hopes of being allowed to see my son but that's clearly not gonna happen until she gets everything."
This is crazy! She added 100 on to what he was already struggling to pay. Man! Then the judge smiled
Daycare is insanely expensive in USA. Here in Sweden we have a cap at max 150$ a month for the first child. The max cap for all the children in a family is 300$ a month.
Dad definitely needs to file a petition to decreased child support ASAP my daughter's dad pays 130.00 total and he makes 2 to 3 time what this man makes. We are in Oklahoma so that maybe the difference 🤷♀️ also I didn't ask for support but in order to get documented full custody the judge required child support. And I didn't call her dad out in the false statements on his income and amount of time he spends with her. Bottom line is I do my best to give all my kids their best life and want the fathers (2) in their lives.
He got screwed in the end. Should have never told the judge that he would pay the daycare. Deny, Deny, next time! Coluld have walked out paying the 340 dollars plus med services.
Gandalf- "I want to be a better man, own up to my mistakes, take responsibility and hopefully have a relationship with my child. I give 45% of my income willingly which equates to 3x the amount I should pay in child support because I want to do the right thing."
Judge- "True, tv dinners and roommates are rough, let's add reimbursing that insurance in addition!"
🤷♂️🤦♂️ wtf is this ruling?? Punish a man who wanted to do the right thing? Shes been paying the insurance comfortably, so why??
Very unfair ruling by the judge, him paying $855 should be voluntary, the court has no right to force him to pay 50% of his income. The man can't even afford housing for himself.
I can't believe she even ADDED more expenses to his already too high payments. This judge got it awfully wrong.
I commend her for keeping this up cause this is horrible. Literally admitting he was paying way to much then saying you don’t know his financial situation despite having the numbers. Then ordering him to pay over 50% of his income instead of lowering it to an acceptable amount is insane. Repeal that section of the law Texas. Wonder why the self deletion rate so high
He looks like he’s gonna go get a lawyer. I actually think this was unfair & this is probably the first time I’ve said this with any of her rulings.
This is the one so far that just was depressing, man struggled to pay for day care. He then had to be legally made to struggle instead of having the law step in and saying he was over paying every month so far. At the start of this the judge was wondering if she was sure she’d want to risk losing extra money, then she GAVE her 113 more.
Absolutely ridiculous if I had been that man I would have said I will go for paying child support it is wrong he also had to pay the health part. If I was that man I would not work. Here in the United Kingdom if you don’t work all you pay is £7 a week out of your benefit money.
The officer that always opens the proceedings is very polite, complements you
I saw her documentary and he's her husband 🥰👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
So she really didn’t see a case where the mom should be splitting that day care bill? Wild.
Hi Judge l think that she should have grateful for daycare being paid. $133.00 he should not have to pay. He has to eat and pay his bills too.🤦
Right it was the “you’ve been comfortably paying it already” how do you know that ma’am? I don’t like this at all.
I disagree with this ruling. Just because he has been paying more doesn't mean he should continue. Also, if he already paying more. Why make him reimburse health care. Absurd
This man was paying more than he should’ve been paying! THIS ONE WAS SO SO SAD TO ME!!!! 1st of all he stated that he’s living in a shared space which is humiliating to anyone especially a grown man! Although he implied that he was struggling he still made a point to pay for daycare. Which probably left him basically with nothing, but he wanted to do his part with some responsibility for his child. So now all that he had after paying for the daycare was for his basic living, rent and food, he now probably have to juggle to see which one is more important. Smdh… she’s going to wind up being responsible for everything because he’s going to end up, homeless or dead.. such a dad and unfair case😢😢😢
I actually feel sorry for the dude. He paid more than he should have, and because of it he's gonna live in a shared appartement until his retirement and beyond. I know it's the law and all but.... If I was a father I would understand this as: give the bare minimum at all times or you might get screwed over later.
"I don't have a law degree, I don't have a lawyer, I don't know how these things work" That's why you NEED A LAWYER!
Lawyers cost money
@@BeccasaurousRex270cheaper than 968 per month for 18 years
There's no good reason why he should be paying 4X as much as he should be when both of them openly said they don't know what they are supposed to be paying/ receiving and he is just paying daycare so she'll let him be a part of his son's life. Child support is the most f'd up system that needs to be fixed
Unfair ruling. He should've just been ordered to pay what he was suppose to. And it would've been up to HIS PREFERENCE whether he wants to add into it as a Father.
Girl you know you were wrong as hell for this verdict.
I'm so glad I am done with child support. My credit score went up 200 points. 🤣🤣🤣
A woman has to pay as well
Wow that's amazing 200 points after child support wow! 😱😱😱.
😂😂😂😂 In the words of the judge.. Congratulations!
Then you must have been in arrears at one time. Typical child support doesn’t appear on credit reports.
@@joytoyouandme4593
You do understand that was a joke right ? 🤔
He was a fool to have set the precedent of paying the Day Care without a Support order...
I don’t agree either‼️The guy got rooked & he knew it. He didn’t act the fool though👌🏽, I’ll say that for him. Rockin beard too💪🏽
I feel the ruling was totally unfair for this man. He was already paying more than double what he was supposed to…
She actually is breaking the law by refusing the father to have visitation. It has nothing to do with child support. The law says he has visitation.
She said comfortably even though she meant to say consistently. But he was consistently living harshly to do it.
This mother is literally negotiating this man access to his child based on what he pays. Girl take him paying daycare and shut up. I’m so confused if he would only be paying $340 then why his he paying $855 and healthcare. If I was him I’d be like no legally I only have to pay child support and health insurance and I believe it’s only half of health insurance. I do not agree with this ruling at all
I disagree with that because if his income by the set standards say he is suppose to pay a lesser amount, then he should have to only pay that with the insurance expense added.
Check with Texas law, that is the law the Judge is upholding. It is fair and just to both parties. He has limited income and is paying for the daycare, same amount as it would be for Child support for one child. You can't have everything.
Startrek1965,
If you listened the, so called judge, she stated that his child support would be around $380.00 a month based on his income of $24,000.00 a year. But because he was already paying $855.00 for daycare that he should continue doing that! What the, so called, judge did wrong was adding the $113.00 for medical insurance. If you would read other comments, the so called, judge reply’s to some comments! Vonda B is not a real judge, she’s a lawyer who works with people who hire her to get the other parent to pay more money to her clients.
@@sherrydepew8815 Look I listened and heard. And its my right to disagree. Have a great day
LauraThe Virgo,
I’m agreeing with you! My comment was for Startrek1965, not you!!!
@@sherrydepew8815 I'm sorry I thought Starttrek was talking to me like that. Have a great day.
I love how everyone is saying how unfair Judge Vonda B was to him with having him continue paying $855+ by adding health insurance reimbursement. NOT A SINGLE ONE OF YOU MENTION THE FACT SHE OFFERED THE BOTH OF THEM TO ADJUST THE NUMBER RIGHT THEN AND THERE!!!. Him/ they decided to not say anything, so when she repeated herself she said if y’all come to an agreement y’all can come back and we can adjust it then!!
Judge was definitely wrong for this one no way he should be paying that much
I got really weird vibes from this entire case. Laying out a year and then stepping up makes it seem like he waited to get a favorable tax return. If he does only make 24k, then the ruling was practically criminal. The lady seemed greedy in that case. He would need to bring a suit for joint custody and get the support removed. That might be better for the kid anyway. The nice thing is the daycare bills will go down as the child gets older.
this is why I came to the comments
Right, but knowing that mom, as soon as daycare goes down, she’ll find some other way to bleed him dry! 😒😔
I think he is less than truthful as well. Favorable is a good word.😊
THANK YOU. Everyone was acting like a victim, and I found it so hard to believe he only made 24k a year. The whole thing was fishy, and i I thought the judge politely let him know
She was being greedy. Very disappointing wish she would have made them split it.
This is one of the most vile and unjust rulings I've ever seen in a court.
Shoot, I'd stop paying daycare, come back to court and just pay my share of regular child support plus half of daycare rather than all of it.
When child starts school I'll be back at court.
I legit went back multiple times just so I can hear the '' Just because I make more money then him , doesn't mean I should be covering all the child's expenses '' ! Has this woman been living under ,a rock or something ???? This is how it has been FOR THE GUYS / Fathers and even worse for millionaires for dacades now .
This was the 2nd video I watched about this judge have no idea how even the 1st one got on my recomended but I know I will not watch any more since I find her ruling to be really bad or just how easy to abuse the laws in the US are and how BAD they are towards fathers or even in more particular the male portion of the population .
I legit feel sorry for you guys over there !
My take away from this is that in our legal system it’s better to be a deadbeat dad than to offer any financial help to the mother of your child. Very sad. This needs to change.
Man’s freely paying 3 times the amount he should and gets taken to court to get that money magically up anyways. That’s some Wingadium Laviousa shit
That’s crazy the judge is allowed to “deviate” from what he should lawfully pay for good reason that means it’s allowing the opinion from judge to judge to come up with higher amounts if they so feel like it
Now look at that SAME scenario in criminal courts. Yep..
Ok I was rocking with you Judge until this case!! This seemed very unfair.
Prime example of how this system doesn’t benefit the man. She could have lowered that man’s support payments. Literally did the calculations herself and still ordered this man to pay 3 times the amount, despite the child’s mother making more than the gentleman. When questioned, the Judge’s only retort was essentially “you’ve been paying it.” Wowzers
What was the judge thinking the whole time? 45% of his income and you raise it? I know for a fact my man is doing so much better now 🙏🏻
Dam,
Pack your bags bro, leave the country