Thank you so much for this highly educational series. As a westerner trying to study the Vedas for many years by myself in Alaska, these conversations are providing clarity on many issues. Now, if I could only be more disciplined in my Sanskrit studies.
absolutely enlightening discussion. mist of sanskrit cannot be translated into english. sometimes, it can be funny like pramahamsa will be great goose🙂
There is also another major distinction. Shastra were revealed to Brahma ji who lives in topmost living system possible in this universe. It is meant for all embodied beings everywhere in this universe to obtain any of 4 purusartha (Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha) and not just this universe millions of other universes as well. While most of these Abhrahamic scriptures are meant for people on earth (which is pretty insignificant in context of this entire universe what to talk about other universes) that too from some point in time; Vedic shastra applies to everyone everywhere in this lila vibhuti (creation manifested by Brahman by employing his prakriti).
So true. History doesn't always require so called writing. Lots of our temples don't have writing but if we can study them even with our limited senses we can learn a lot. Another example is coming to my mind is the Great Pyramid if Giza. There is not a single writing found in Giza complex.
WOW! and here in the documentaries/movies (even on satyamed jatey untouchability epsode) they show 'Pundits' and 'Shadus' the cult follower of bristish manipulated Manusmirt, casteist, but they never been tried to show this reality. A huge game is going on.
This is really revealing. My own understanding has expanded watching this series and detoxed of false imprints. Deeply grateful to both of you. Thank you.
Sastra means instructions ,directions, commands (that which is doing saasana)so that people practice DHARMA, (in the absence of saastra people act as per Vaasana)which is SREYAS for all including animate and inanimate. Also,saastrapramanam is overriding on all pramanams.Thasmal saastram pramaanam theey...Gitaji. Sastreeya sangeeth is as per Saamaveda saasthra. (Carnatic and Hindustani)
Yes its true. I am seated in everyone's heart, and from me comes rememberance, knowledge and forgetfulness. By all the Vedas I am to be known. Indeed I'm the compiler of Vedanta, and I am the knower of the Vedas ( BG 15/15 ) The entire Vedas is compressed in the 700 verses of the Bhagavat Gita.
Even 100 CE dating is wrong coz they base Gupta period to 300 CE whixh is 300 BCE. Vikrama of Ujjain was 57 BCE. To fit Indian chronology into 1500 bce (by xtian Issac Newton) distorted chronology was imposed by xtian historians. Maurya period 1500 BCE, Budha 1850 BCE
The best video of the series, finally Rajiv ji admitted frankly that western ideologies is stupid. Waiting for the day when you'll admit that Jesus was cooked up by Roman King. He never existed
It’s a very nice book...I have started reading it and came to know it after watching videos of Pushpendraji... Being Hindu I was very keen in understanding my beliefs and traditions... Require series of books for more words which still needs in our indigenous culture...
To me Shastra contains laws of the universe. As these laws are eternal, Shastra is also eternal. For example, theory of relativity always existed as natural laws but Einstein discovered the law. All our Scriptures are discovery of eternal laws of the universe.
huge respect to u sir , i have one issue that i think should come to our notice , there is chanel on yt named sakshi apologetics , he is accusing u for having conversation with mrs. esther as fake , i hope u will respond it to him someday ,
If u feel drawn to buddhism follow it, philosophies majorly match but one thing that is big difference is : hinduism gives each devotee to see Ishwara in form or formless way depending upon how they pray, connect, rever Ishwara. So if devotee pray ishwara as Shiva there is huge chance for devotee to merge in Shiva only , if devotee believes in concept of formless ishwara, devotee will merge is that only. Buddism on other hand believes there is no form or formless but a shunya...there shunya can be compared to FORMLESS TO SOME extent. Please watch Om Swami Ji 's video on same.
शास्त्र mean अन्तः यात्रा मार्ग-साधन-विधि, प्रयोग फल अंत तक, पूर्ण सही ज्ञान-विज्ञान-विद्या, दर्शन-अनुभूति-उपलब्धि सर्वत्र, विश्व भर में जीवन भर के लिए, पूर्ण सही doing,
At 5:38 Swamiji says if any text not compliant with Vedas it is not shastra. I fully agree with this position. But wondering why Swamiji said Hanuman is avatara of Shiva (in Hanuman video)? In spite of Vedic testimony that Hanuman is Mukhya PraNa tatva, he went on holding un-shastric position. Swamiji -- please correct your understanding.
Ved is Vidhaya (Knowledge) about Brahm from BrahmaRishi's Sages to Shishya's in Oral Tradition of Guru and Shishya Parampara. Thus called Shruti. Dharma Shastra is Written form to Study of Dharma for Modern Times, KaliYug. Dharma is Science of Nature. Natural Science. Natural Science is divided into two parts : Space and Earth. Space (Infinite) and Earth(Finite). Similar to Energy and Mass. Spiritual and Material. ParaNormal and Normal. Soul and Body. Please Clear My Views...
Couple of questions : Does Brahma getting knowledge of vedas at start ?? As we say vedas were written on earth by Rishis so wasnt it rishis who documented it? 2) concept of vaikuntha ...how is it different from concept of heaven n hell in abhramic religions, currently most hindus believe in moksha but not much on vaikuntha... kindly explain. 3) Is Garuda Puran real? It is not followed in every hindu household of india ..and also ut is very terrifying to hear..very similar to concept of hell in abhrahmic religion. Kindly explain.
Well, this video talks about Shastra and there is no mention of ApourusheyattvaM (unauthoredness) concept? Quite lapsing in fidelity of this video. The very validity (pramANyattvaM) of Veda Shastra is rooted on the fact that they are being apourusheya. The defense and establishment of Vedic validity on the first principle is quite explored in work of Sri. Madhva Acharya "Vishnu Tatva Vinirnaya". Please make an attempt to study VTVN and its commentaries and bring forth possible another video session.
We don't necessarily have to reject others to Ex-ist. Negation is not Rejection. Sword is good & useful, but it's only a tool. You don't become sword! Veda is Vidya - verb than noun. It means practise driven experience driven etc. It does not mean what's "mentioned", but, practicality. Niruddha is crux in Negation, rejection is only tool used to Negate! India's identity is not "Other Rejection" or a mere comparative difference. India is flow from sufficiency!!! Not a deficient, suppliment driven identity.
In the old or new testament you must accept God's righteousness in your heart to gain salvation. It is a faith or force for good works. It is wisdom for Dharma only.
261.1 Matter of MATHAM MA & TA are the sounds which make the word MATHAM. Together does it represent the perception of MA, the self about TA, something in its environment ? MATHAM is MA's (self's) opinion about TA, the other ! A "TA" visible for everyone on earth is Sun ( Moon is also significantly visible from earth but stars are not ). Opinion about sun and moon divided people. MAs of the same opinion on TA came together and grouped as MATHAM. Generalisations were made on limited personal observations and SAASTRA was formed. Categorisation ( making TARA of ) of those beneficial to self (SA)and not beneficial (ASA) is SAASTRA, science. MA is the exterior ( the interactive pattern / now it has gone still outer to the type or colour of the dress) of the self.. Based on the attire we are invoked to group, to love, to hate and to fight. MAs of the same appearance gather together and form a common boundary around the aggregate. The common interactive pattern is further galvanized by a creed and rituals. The united body MATHAM of similar MAs is stronger to defend from the common enemy. The common enemy ( infidel / kaafir ) is anyone (even own child) who has a different opinion about TA ( a different SAASTRA). EL, the rising sun, the most visible TA from earth became the point of discussion. The daily and annual movements of the EL formed a SAASTRA. AL, the crescent moon also gathered observers, and a different SAASTRA developed around the lunar movements. EL & AL became guides ( Gods). The rising nature of EL (rising sun) and AL (the crescent moon) made human beings with MAAYA traits to worship them in the hope of getting back the ever increasing wealth and prosperity. EL is considered God by some & AL is considered God (the guide of direction and time,Creator,Almighty.) by some other. Ideas about TA united believers and disconnected them from infidels. Superstitions ruled followers. People were ready to kill and be killed for the perpetuation of their own truth (ideas about TA / SAASTRA/superstitions). MATHAM (conception) of the victor is imposed on the vanquished if it is not voluntarily accepted. Matham, the religion of the Victor rules the region where they reign. IsraEL and the followers of ALlah continue their fight though the idea about "TA" ( moon and sun) advanced much beyond the religious convictions. Opinions of MA about TA ( MATHAM) separated mankind. EL (sun, Surya, Ravi) followers considered their God as the best guide, the unique One, the Almighty. AL (moon, Chandra) followers gave the almighty status to their own conception. Re-legion means a legion (war group) formed again. A war group for protecting the grand boundary MA of MATHA based on MITHYA (myths(myth was a truth of yesterday maybe of today, not the truth of tomorrow). War for protecting the rituals which sustains MATHA (War for protecting the modus operandi of propitiating the supernatural guide) is "sanctioned" by God ! SAASTRA means classification into SA & ASA (useful to self and not useful to self). Personal benefit is the purpose of SAASTRA and personal observation is the method. Observations and findings of other learned are accepted without doubting or questioning. Time and direction were created based on solar and lunar movements. Personal opinions about favorable times, directions, positions became SAASTRA not refuted by anybody. Thus Astrology, Vaastu etc. became SAASTRA in the opinion of gullible public. When MA observes and formulates ideas about TA without any personal interests the unbiased formulation about TA would yield repeatable(R) results (truth). The object of observation is called MATTER. MATTER of MATHAM is that MATHAM is biased and is unreliable to get the repetitiveness of truth. Bias causes gross errors. MA is biased. MA's observation of TA is biased. Note: This is just an attempt to learn the meaning of widely used names and words. Not a propaganda of any ideology.
Since we are comparing religion i would like to know if a female can be priest or not what shastra says about female being a brahmin or a kshtriya warrior or they are not allowed to learn sashtra or vedas & there is consept of swaymvar but is there anything about devorce in indian scriptures
Read Shastras. Stop being a pseudo feminist. There have been many Guru Matas and Female pujaris. There's a temple where men are not allowed. Only females can become pujaris there. Hinduism is the only Dharma that gives more importance to women than men.
If Brahma (Almighty) can be male (Shiv), female (Parvathi) and bisexual (Ardhanarishwar) there is no question of preventing a women becoming a priest, warrior, etc., etc. Divorce is an alien concept does not exist in Sanatan Dharma, However, tyaga did exist.
Totally wrong. Science is OBJECTIVE and repeatable. YOU on the other hand, are the observer of the objectiveness, hence science cannot be used to study YOU, the CONSCIOUS SELF.
Talking about Shastras and Vedas, and calling them "हिंदू" tradition.. Funny ain't it. None of the सांस्कृतिक artifacts mentions this word even once, and yet these people are doing सांस्कृतिक struggle in a name which isn't there in the संस्कृति।
Sorry, Atma is NOT A part of Bhgvan. Atma is, Bhagavan is, pure existence. No duality here. Ayam Atma Brahmam, Aham Brhmasmi. I am THAT. Tat Tvam Asi. All Mahavakyam of Vedas.
These so presumed scholars are very confused about the Vedic language (chandas) and the AD era codified Sanskrit language! As other languages Sanskrit too is restricted pronunciation because of its use of Devanagari Script! So there is nothing divine about Sanskrit! Sanskrit language is the Pali language and Tamilized version!
Wrong. Shruti is saptha only, later it was written in language format and Devanagiri script as well as in many scripts including Brahmi well before that and in Granthams. Pallavas inscriptions are in Tamil Grantham. Tamil follows Panini’s grammar like all Indian languages.
मल्होत्रा साहब हम आपके सदैव आभारी रहेगे।
Thank you so much for this highly educational series. As a westerner trying to study the Vedas for many years by myself in Alaska, these conversations are providing clarity on many issues. Now, if I could only be more disciplined in my Sanskrit studies.
absolutely enlightening discussion. mist of sanskrit cannot be translated into english. sometimes, it can be funny like pramahamsa will be great goose🙂
We have to be proud to be Indian. Support Rajiv sir.
You are Hero of Hindu Renaissance....
There is also another major distinction. Shastra were revealed to Brahma ji who lives in topmost living system possible in this universe. It is meant for all embodied beings everywhere in this universe to obtain any of 4 purusartha (Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha) and not just this universe millions of other universes as well. While most of these Abhrahamic scriptures are meant for people on earth (which is pretty insignificant in context of this entire universe what to talk about other universes) that too from some point in time; Vedic shastra applies to everyone everywhere in this lila vibhuti (creation manifested by Brahman by employing his prakriti).
great episode 🙏..A great step to resist digestion.
Har Har Mahadev 🔱
Jai Shri Ram 🙏🕉️🚩🚩🚩
Jai Hindu Universalism 🚩
So true. History doesn't always require so called writing. Lots of our temples don't have writing but if we can study them even with our limited senses we can learn a lot. Another example is coming to my mind is the Great Pyramid if Giza. There is not a single writing found in Giza complex.
WOW! and here in the documentaries/movies (even on satyamed jatey untouchability epsode) they show 'Pundits' and 'Shadus' the cult follower of bristish manipulated Manusmirt, casteist, but they never been tried to show this reality. A huge game is going on.
This is really revealing. My own understanding has expanded watching this series and detoxed of false imprints. Deeply grateful to both of you. Thank you.
धन्यवाद् श्री राजीव मल्होत्रा जी 🙏
धन्यवाद् श्री सत्यनारायण दास बाबाजी 🙏
Very very enlightening episode. Naman to both the Gyani.
Our Rishis knew all sorts of error correcting techniques
Makes perfect sense. Essential knowledge for all. Dhanyawad Pandit-ji and Rajiv-ji🙏.
Sastra means instructions ,directions, commands (that which is doing saasana)so that people practice DHARMA, (in the absence of saastra people act as per Vaasana)which is SREYAS for all including animate and inanimate. Also,saastrapramanam is overriding on all pramanams.Thasmal saastram pramaanam theey...Gitaji. Sastreeya sangeeth is as per Saamaveda saasthra. (Carnatic and Hindustani)
Hindustani? It is a corrupted Persian/ Arabic version of carnatic music.
The main goal of sastra according to srimad bagavatham is to attain krishna consciousness 🙏
Are you an ISKCON member? Well said!
Yes its true.
I am seated in everyone's heart, and from me comes rememberance, knowledge and forgetfulness. By all the Vedas I am to be known. Indeed I'm the compiler of Vedanta, and I am the knower of the Vedas ( BG 15/15 )
The entire Vedas is compressed in the 700 verses of the Bhagavat Gita.
Even 100 CE dating is wrong coz they base Gupta period to 300 CE whixh is 300 BCE.
Vikrama of Ujjain was 57 BCE.
To fit Indian chronology into 1500 bce (by xtian Issac Newton) distorted chronology was imposed by xtian historians.
Maurya period 1500 BCE, Budha 1850 BCE
Absolutely mind blowing explanation! Thanks for this video.
The best video of the series, finally Rajiv ji admitted frankly that western ideologies is stupid. Waiting for the day when you'll admit that Jesus was cooked up by Roman King. He never existed
Amazing initiative taken by you.
It’s a very nice book...I have started reading it and came to know it after watching videos of Pushpendraji...
Being Hindu I was very keen in understanding my beliefs and traditions...
Require series of books for more words which still needs in our indigenous culture...
At minute 2:30, it is an important point that Shri Rajiv Malhotra makes.
Om tatsat
But one thing i would like to say is the compilation and modification of smritis can be done by only Bonafide Acharyas or Rishis .
Great initiatives.
To me Shastra contains laws of the universe. As these laws are eternal, Shastra is also eternal. For example, theory of relativity always existed as natural laws but Einstein discovered the law. All our Scriptures are discovery of eternal laws of the universe.
huge respect to u sir , i have one issue that i think should come to our notice , there is chanel on yt named sakshi apologetics , he is accusing u for having conversation with mrs. esther as fake , i hope u will respond it to him someday ,
Thank you so much once again Sir!
Good
namaste sir please make a video on hinduism versus buddhism ...coz in west everything is about buddhism....thanks
If u feel drawn to buddhism follow it, philosophies majorly match but one thing that is big difference is : hinduism gives each devotee to see Ishwara in form or formless way depending upon how they pray, connect, rever Ishwara. So if devotee pray ishwara as Shiva there is huge chance for devotee to merge in Shiva only , if devotee believes in concept of formless ishwara, devotee will merge is that only. Buddism on other hand believes there is no form or formless but a shunya...there shunya can be compared to FORMLESS TO SOME extent. Please watch Om Swami Ji 's video on same.
Wow
सादर प्रणाम स्वीकार करें।
Wonderful 😊 work Sir
Interesting.... Thank you Baba ki and Rajiv ji
शास्त्र mean अन्तः यात्रा मार्ग-साधन-विधि, प्रयोग फल अंत तक, पूर्ण सही ज्ञान-विज्ञान-विद्या, दर्शन-अनुभूति-उपलब्धि सर्वत्र, विश्व भर में जीवन भर के लिए, पूर्ण सही doing,
hats off to u sir
For people interested in some more etymological explanation: www.advaita-academy.org/blogs/shastra-and-the-teacher-a-few-more-thoughts
Hey help poor Hindu and free the temple ,and use that money to save our culture and people
At 5:38 Swamiji says if any text not compliant with Vedas it is not shastra. I fully agree with this position. But wondering why Swamiji said Hanuman is avatara of Shiva (in Hanuman video)? In spite of Vedic testimony that Hanuman is Mukhya PraNa tatva, he went on holding un-shastric position. Swamiji -- please correct your understanding.
very informative
Best part of this series sanskrit non-translatable
Ved is Vidhaya (Knowledge) about Brahm from BrahmaRishi's Sages to Shishya's in Oral Tradition of Guru and Shishya Parampara. Thus called Shruti.
Dharma Shastra is Written form to Study of Dharma for Modern Times, KaliYug.
Dharma is Science of Nature. Natural Science. Natural Science is divided into two parts : Space and Earth. Space (Infinite) and Earth(Finite). Similar to Energy and Mass. Spiritual and Material. ParaNormal and Normal. Soul and Body.
Please Clear My Views...
Couple of questions : Does Brahma getting knowledge of vedas at start ?? As we say vedas were written on earth by Rishis so wasnt it rishis who documented it?
2) concept of vaikuntha ...how is it different from concept of heaven n hell in abhramic religions, currently most hindus believe in moksha but not much on vaikuntha... kindly explain.
3) Is Garuda Puran real? It is not followed in every hindu household of india ..and also ut is very terrifying to hear..very similar to concept of hell in abhrahmic religion. Kindly explain.
🙏👌 , 🙏👌.
Shastra is Shaswata while scripture is a movie script.
Shastra = scientifically
🕉️💐🌹🙏🌹💐🕉️
👍🏾
Well, this video talks about Shastra and there is no mention of ApourusheyattvaM (unauthoredness) concept? Quite lapsing in fidelity of this video. The very validity (pramANyattvaM) of Veda Shastra is rooted on the fact that they are being apourusheya. The defense and establishment of Vedic validity on the first principle is quite explored in work of Sri. Madhva Acharya "Vishnu Tatva Vinirnaya". Please make an attempt to study VTVN and its commentaries and bring forth possible another video session.
We don't necessarily have to reject others to Ex-ist. Negation is not Rejection. Sword is good & useful, but it's only a tool. You don't become sword! Veda is Vidya - verb than noun. It means practise driven experience driven etc. It does not mean what's "mentioned", but, practicality. Niruddha is crux in Negation, rejection is only tool used to Negate! India's identity is not "Other Rejection" or a mere comparative difference. India is flow from sufficiency!!! Not a deficient, suppliment driven identity.
Manu Smruthi is sastera too! Is it eternal?
Yes
Smruthi is rule book that changes with time where as Shruthi is eternal.
We would like to hear the secret of Puranic unacceptable sexual stories. I want to know the reason behind those descriptions.
Those are fake mixed stories
Bhai har jagah bas sexual me hi interested rehte ho aap log..ye generation ko porn ke irdhgirdh bhi sujhta hai ki nahi?
Metaphor, allegory, उपमा, मानवीकरण
Which one? What do you find unacceptable? And if any, you will find the context there itself
In the old or new testament you must accept God's righteousness in your heart to gain salvation. It is a faith or force for good works. It is wisdom for Dharma only.
261.1
Matter of MATHAM
MA & TA are the sounds which make the word MATHAM. Together does it represent the perception of MA, the self about TA, something in its environment ? MATHAM is MA's (self's) opinion about TA, the other ! A "TA" visible for everyone on earth is Sun ( Moon is also significantly visible from earth but stars are not ). Opinion about sun and moon divided people. MAs of the same opinion on TA came together and grouped as MATHAM.
Generalisations were made on limited personal observations and SAASTRA was formed. Categorisation ( making TARA of ) of those beneficial to self (SA)and not beneficial (ASA) is SAASTRA, science.
MA is the exterior ( the interactive pattern / now it has gone still outer to the type or colour of the dress) of the self.. Based on the attire we are invoked to group, to love, to hate and to fight. MAs of the same appearance gather together and form a common boundary around the aggregate. The common interactive pattern is further galvanized by a creed and rituals. The united body MATHAM of similar MAs is stronger to defend from the common enemy. The common enemy ( infidel / kaafir ) is anyone (even own child) who has a different opinion about TA ( a different SAASTRA).
EL, the rising sun, the most visible TA from earth became the point of discussion. The daily and annual movements of the EL formed a SAASTRA. AL, the crescent moon also gathered observers, and a different SAASTRA developed around the lunar movements. EL & AL became guides ( Gods). The rising nature of EL (rising sun) and AL (the crescent moon) made human beings with MAAYA traits to worship them in the hope of getting back the ever increasing wealth and prosperity. EL is considered God by some & AL is considered God (the guide of direction and time,Creator,Almighty.) by some other. Ideas about TA united believers and disconnected them from infidels. Superstitions ruled followers. People were ready to kill and be killed for the perpetuation of their own truth (ideas about TA / SAASTRA/superstitions). MATHAM (conception) of the victor is imposed on the vanquished if it is not voluntarily accepted. Matham, the religion of the Victor rules the region where they reign. IsraEL and the followers of ALlah continue their fight though the idea about "TA" ( moon and sun) advanced much beyond the religious convictions.
Opinions of MA about TA ( MATHAM) separated mankind. EL (sun, Surya, Ravi) followers considered their God as the best guide, the unique One, the Almighty. AL (moon, Chandra) followers gave the almighty status to their own conception. Re-legion means a legion (war group) formed again. A war group for protecting the grand boundary MA of MATHA based on MITHYA (myths(myth was a truth of yesterday maybe of today, not the truth of tomorrow). War for protecting the rituals which sustains MATHA (War for protecting the modus operandi of propitiating the supernatural guide) is "sanctioned" by God !
SAASTRA means classification into SA & ASA (useful to self and not useful to self). Personal benefit is the purpose of SAASTRA and personal observation is the method. Observations and findings of other learned are accepted without doubting or questioning. Time and direction were created based on solar and lunar movements. Personal opinions about favorable times, directions, positions became SAASTRA not refuted by anybody. Thus Astrology, Vaastu etc. became SAASTRA in the opinion of gullible public.
When MA observes and formulates ideas about TA without any personal interests the unbiased formulation about TA would yield repeatable(R) results (truth). The object of observation is called MATTER.
MATTER of MATHAM is that MATHAM is biased and is unreliable to get the repetitiveness of truth. Bias causes gross errors. MA is biased. MA's observation of TA is biased.
Note: This is just an attempt to learn the meaning of widely used names and words. Not a propaganda of any ideology.
YOU GUYS ARE SO DIFFICULT TO DONATE. KOI PAYTM/GOOGLE PAY ID NAHI HAI!?
If Sanskrit is non translatable then why not use it instread?
Why always people mention Krishna as an incarnation of lord Vishnu? Don't they know about Krishna or just because of ignorance or believe it.
He is incarnation of Lord Vishnu as per Shastras.
Buddha isn't part of Dashavatharam. The right one is Matsya, Kurma, Varaha, Narasimha,Vamana, Parashurama, Rama, Balrama, Krishna, Kalki.
Jai Siyaram 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
ua-cam.com/video/xwq6Xn8QFY8/v-deo.html
Since we are comparing religion i would like to know if a female can be priest or not what shastra says about female being a brahmin or a kshtriya warrior or they are not allowed to learn sashtra or vedas & there is consept of swaymvar but is there anything about devorce in indian scriptures
Read Shastras. Stop being a pseudo feminist. There have been many Guru Matas and Female pujaris. There's a temple where men are not allowed. Only females can become pujaris there. Hinduism is the only Dharma that gives more importance to women than men.
If Brahma (Almighty) can be male (Shiv), female (Parvathi) and bisexual (Ardhanarishwar) there is no question of preventing a women becoming a priest, warrior, etc., etc. Divorce is an alien concept does not exist in Sanatan Dharma, However, tyaga did exist.
jAI hO
कृपया अपने शीर्षक का भाषांतर करें.🙏
Shaastra needs to be compared with the word science, not with scripture..
Totally wrong. Science is OBJECTIVE and repeatable. YOU on the other hand, are the observer of the objectiveness, hence science cannot be used to study YOU, the CONSCIOUS SELF.
Talking about Shastras and Vedas, and calling them "हिंदू" tradition.. Funny ain't it. None of the सांस्कृतिक artifacts mentions this word even once, and yet these people are doing सांस्कृतिक struggle in a name which isn't there in the संस्कृति।
Aha, here comes the Asura infection.
पूर्व पाकिस्तानी मेयर आरिफ अज़ाकिया लाइव साइबर सिपाही यूट्यूब चैनल पर👇
लिंक : ua-cam.com/video/v2CDaZsalZY/v-deo.html
Nonhindu religion of book is political, go on sin, they will not go to hell but diverted to haven.
Sorry, Atma is NOT A part of Bhgvan. Atma is, Bhagavan is, pure existence. No duality here. Ayam Atma Brahmam, Aham Brhmasmi. I am THAT. Tat Tvam Asi. All Mahavakyam of Vedas.
All just imaginary, and many things are out of Vedas.
Abrahamic religions are imaginary
Stop taking and act
These so presumed scholars are very confused about the Vedic language (chandas) and the AD era codified Sanskrit language! As other languages Sanskrit too is restricted pronunciation because of its use of Devanagari Script! So there is nothing divine about Sanskrit! Sanskrit language is the Pali language and Tamilized version!
Wrong. Shruti is saptha only, later it was written in language format and Devanagiri script as well as in many scripts including Brahmi well before that and in Granthams. Pallavas inscriptions are in Tamil Grantham. Tamil follows Panini’s grammar like all Indian languages.