just to mention- It doesn't matter any thought process whatsoever needed in a project , it's purely based on function and the cost-effectiveness it holds and be delivered with money-pouring stakeholders ,so AI based permutations would be required and not the soul sucking expensive Architecture degree where pointless little strokes and ideas that means nothing in the practical world except a huge debt , also the technologist ideating what the real world execution would look like are the degrees which should be taught and not these colorful pointless diagrams Columbia GSAP , if I got the name right will only teach a final thesis which resembles mostly a rhino model torn by street dogs, getting recognised by a 60+ old fellow who can't remember what they had for breakfast but have some few worthless inspiration architecture quotes in their pocket earning $450 K pretax so expensive art/architecture school to paint a horrible picture is not as good when compared to the real works which are done on site, any technologist can automate the whole process with the given project requirements, I honestly don't know why these expensive degrees exist, when all can be done by developer with some technical knowledge on architecture such as program distributions and the strategic planning decisions you guys eat all people's money and make a living is what I am saying, and I want that to be explicit, thank you
woo yay
just to mention- It doesn't matter any thought process whatsoever needed in a project , it's purely based on function and the cost-effectiveness it holds and be delivered with money-pouring stakeholders ,so AI based permutations would be required and not the soul sucking expensive Architecture degree where pointless little strokes and ideas that means nothing in the practical world except a huge debt ,
also the technologist ideating what the real world execution would look like are the degrees which should be taught and not these colorful pointless diagrams
Columbia GSAP , if I got the name right will only teach a final thesis which resembles mostly a rhino model torn by street dogs, getting recognised by a 60+ old fellow who can't remember what they had for breakfast but have some few worthless inspiration architecture quotes in their pocket earning $450 K pretax
so expensive art/architecture school to paint a horrible picture is not as good when compared to the real works which are done on site, any technologist can automate the whole process with the given project requirements, I honestly don't know why these expensive degrees exist, when all can be done by developer with some technical knowledge on architecture such as program distributions and the strategic planning decisions
you guys eat all people's money and make a living is what I am saying, and I want that to be explicit, thank you