@@gamerboi9561people always bring this up, but like GL was fully created and formed as a character with his primary weakness being yellow, like yes they retconned it but still a goofy moment in comics to point out
@@Vekcrazah Nah, we've also got that like ten minute short about Megamind accidentally activating one of his killing robots by accident (after selling most of his evil inventions)
@@airplanes_aren.t_real When you get the calcified particles out of the balance coils in your ear. I looked up "how to do the Epley Maneuver at Home" online. You basically lie down and rotate from one side to the other at a specific angle and stopping in specific positions. This rolls the particles out of the balance spiral of your ear. It worked. (Much better than my dr's suggestion, which was to sit on a bed and throw myself violently from side to side - which made me dizzy and nauseous. I'm very thankful to the audiologist who suggested the Epley Manuever!)
Ugh, I know! Mine comes and goes. It drives me up the wall when people call it a “little bit dizzy” though lol. I get nauseous because my brains acting like it’s on a damn roller coaster while I’m curled up in bed. I hate it. And you’d think closer your eyes would help, but nope! Ugh, again. Stupid vertigo.
@@airplanes_aren.t_realI occasionally get it when trying to sleep. Have you seen the medical “exercises” online? They’re really simple. A couple actually helped me out with the positional vertigo; unfortunately, they rarely help when my vertigo is triggered by something else- like meds- but in my opinion, it’s worth a try!
@@j_g9109One of your comments got shadow censored by UA-cam but fortunately the UA-cam mobile app has the function of looking through a person's recent comments on a certain channel's comment section if you click a commenters pfp so I still read it. Hopefully you get healed from your conditions someday if it's possible or becomes possible...idk if I'm gonna be able to be healed from my tinnitus since I don't know what caused it yet and whether I can recover and become tinnitus-free again somehow.
@@lukeleary1333Wood was never glc weakness, only one person has ever had it as a weakness as just after he got his powers he got hit by a bat and thought the ring couldn't affect wood, this making it true for him specifically.
I love the idea of a villain putting in a ton of work to come up with devious schemes that can provide an interesting challenge to an overpowered superhero, being upset that the hero never seems to match his enthusiasm for novelty or appreciate his dedication to a job well done.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Jack's ability to do funny, self-serious bosses/guy in charge type characters is _unparalleled_ and Chris always plays against those characters perfectly, immaculate pairing, love these guys, no notes, would binge every sketch again
Most of this wasn’t in the original video, and it makes me so happy to see people using shorts to publish bits that didn’t otherwise make the final cut
"Its lame, its unfair, you need to be nerfed" sounded like trump there in case anyone didn't know, I'm talking about the voice itself, not the actual words
The hero should come back to the villain and try to list his new thought out "weaknesses" that are actually just other ways that make him incredible. Just accidentally rubbing it in no matter what he says and just makes it worse and depresseses the villain so badly he retires.
@@ryansmith-jr4gn Are you talking about Dorothy Woolfolk when she announced that in 1993? Yeah, I guess. The first time it was introduced it was said to weaken Superman and give powers to humans. The idea was scrapped because it seemed dumb at the time. Then they came up with it later on ‘51 and only used the idea when it seemed beneficial to them (taking a vacation, when to expand on the idea, revealing to Lois Lane that he is Superman, etc.). If you want we can just keep quoting Wikipedia or we can leave it alone.
@jasbdmsb I'm pretty sure it's just common trivia knowledge that kryptonite first appeared in the radio show, and the rest was just him fact checking himself and adding useful additional info. But what's really important to me is pointing out that your reply reads as you acting all superior, yet this guy *did* correct you because you *were* wrong. AND you're the one that decided to start quoting Wikipedia to his reply (which, yes he probably fact checked himself with Wikipedia or something else). And then you're like "or can we leave it alone", which I feel implies that this guy wasn't leaving it alone, but really he just swooped in, corrected something and left. So it really does feel like you just wanted to have the last word Now, I suppose there's the possibility of there being deleted comments that I didn't see, but if that were the case, I'd expect more than just the 2 replies total.
@@S_Sense I love how you like to call my actions pompous and arrogant because I fact checked myself; however, when the other person fact checked himself and me you like to dismiss it because the virtuous thing to do is attack the arrogant one. I love that because it makes you sound like a hypocrite without you even knowing because it only serves to help your argument despite it hurting most of your speech. What I don’t like is that you said this is REALLY important to you almost implying that you cannot wait to address this comment. He didn’t correct me because the information brought forward by both of us was true. Kryptonite was brought up several years after his creation, but the only reason for it was to relieve the voice actor and allow him to take a break (either it was a vacation or his voice was bad). The other time, if you read, was to weaken Superman and simultaneously give powers to other humans. Why doesn’t it do that now? It doesn’t do that now because they scrapped the idea of him having a weakness and only reintroduced it for the story to make sense, canonically, as well as help Superman seem more relatable instead of being an unlikeable hero. Basically, Superman was the conclusion character: “…and then Superman showed up and they lived happily ever after. The End.” He had no weaknesses, and as I explained earlier he Kryptonite wasn’t ESTABLISHED as his actual, canonical, weakness until 1993. Kryptonite may have shown up throughout the years, sporadically, but it wasn’t an official idea. Heroes need weaknesses in order to become likeable otherwise they just turn into a spoof, unlikeable, boring character that isn’t relatable. Lastly, I don’t think the person I was speaking to would do something as lowly as delete a comment even if what they said only hurt their argument. I wouldn’t delete my comments either for that reason even if I look like a jackass to everyone. The only time I would be guilty of deleting a comment is if I thought it was funny, I posted it, read it, and realized it was lame or if the comment lacked anything at all. You might think this comment lacks substance but that’s probably because you don’t like me, personally, even though we never met. I mean, you made a hypocrite of yourself when you were mad when I fact checked myself, but it’s perfectly fine if someone else were to do it. That makes it a personal attack rather than an unbiased one. 🤪 All jokes aside I hope you read through all of this comment instead of reading bits and pieces like you did for my previous comment.
@@S_Sense I forgot one thing, the reason why I said what I said at the end was because it was pointless to say what everyone else can read on Wikipedia. Why do you think I specifically said that it was on Wikipedia? Why wasn’t it said in their comment? I made sure to read the article too and said what I said. If anything I was willing to talk more about what wasn’t written on Wikipedia hoping to hear what they had to say. I didn’t say something like, “shut up,” even though it could be misinterpreted as that.
@@jasbdmsb Hello. First half of this is about the stuff you said about me specifically, part is how you're wrong. - I didn't call your actions pompous and arrogant. So the stuff you said based on that is wrong. - My word choice of "really" was the use of it that is synonymous with "actually". I was using it to dismiss the first part of what I said as merely a passing, and not all that important thought. - I didn't say you were acting superior because you fact checked yourself. I quite explicitly pointed out the parts, and it was on the language you were using. - I haven't been mad. Think about it logically, at that point you hadn't said anything to me, and I kept everything quite brief. So out of the 2 of us, who would be mad? Even in this I've been quite systematic, keeping feelings from fact. - I think think possibly you're projecting, considering: You wrote so much to seem like a victim, how much you wanted to call me a hypocrite, you saying you felt attacked, you just adding in stuff I didn't say, and the use of this emoji 🤪, the use of "I love" followed by something bad, . I mean, we could look at what would have happened if you weren't mad and didn't let your feelings take over. It would have been something like this "oh, this is what I actually meant, there's been a misunderstanding. also I don't think anything I said was incorrect, could you explain why you think I've been corrected?" So basically just the extra comment you added on the end with a sensible question, instead of blind defensiveness. And that example I gave is just 1 way you could have denied being wrong, while clearing up thoughts on you, while also not having to just assume stuff about me or just add in stuff I didn't say. -Also, I said about the wiki stuff because you brought it up in the same sentence as something you've just admitted could be misinterpreted as a "shut up" statement. As a summery: I said you seemed to be acting superior, despite being corrected. You felt hurt by me saying that that so you looked for a bunch of subtext in what I said, but I kept what I wrote brief so you had to add some of your own to what I said. (and acting superior is very different to being pompous and arrogant. in case you wanted to add that in). If we are to continue this talk in the comment section, I suggest we make a small truce, and no longer talk about each other. We can talk about the facts about superman comics, and you can clear up the things you think I've gotten wrong about you here in this first part, and I could even talk about myself if I wanted to. How does that sound? I started work on it already, even. I shut down what you got wrong about me, and confined things specifically about you to just the summery and the parts around you projecting. 2nd part: yes. 2 people can say things that can be true at the same time, but that's not what happened here. He did, in fact, correct you. Your first comment says "Superman didn’t have a weakness for decades", which can't be true at the same time as superman having a weakness in the comics 11 years after his creation (in 1949). 11 years =/= decades. (that was just me retelling you what he said and now for me to add my own info). And it very much was a weakness. Even after that, it continued to appear in the 50s as his established weakness (the 50s were only 12 years after his creation). Even if we go with your idea that it was sporadic (even though after 1950, it's use steadily increased over time), it was still established in the comics. I think you've possibly mixed up information on Kryptonite and K-metal which was an unreleased thing from 1940 (2 years after superman). Because the 1993 time that you have is just when the interview took place. But Kyptonite being his weakness was a well established thing in the comics well before that interview ever took place. And just to be absolutely clear, so you don't go off on another tangent that isn't relevant to what I said (referring to you explaining why characters need flaws), The specific thing I'm saying you got wrong is "Superman didn’t have a weakness for decades" because it took less than a decade and a half for him to be given a weakness in the source material.
@@r.s.2890 Yeah, I love his reaction after "winning", too. Homie embodied Joker's quote of: "I wouldn't even know what to do if I caught you [Batman], I'm just like a dog chasing a car, what would I do if I got it?! I don't know!"
“What a waste man. You’re no fun to fight against.” -the Super Villain equivalent of “I’m not mad, just disappointed” If I was the superhero, I would be GUTTED.
A hero with no weaknesses is not no fun. At that point its not a matter of testing what can they survive. It a matter of putting them in scenarios where they can easily choose to do evil yet choose to do good instead. The point is to test the heroic nature
Ok, a superhero needs a weakness but it’s better if the weakness is an unfortunate side effect of their power that you don’t think of at first instead of something arbitrary like a rare crystal.
@@TheTideKing004 I mean, if you're a good superhero who tries to protect people, then any complication to the goals of protecting yourself, civilians, and infrastructure counts as an exploitable weakness. If your superpower was the ability to create and control a miniature sun that plasmises everything in a 30 foot radius, then I'd call that a real liability for mitigating damage. There's no room for nonlethal takedowns if using your power means vaporizing your opponent. That means this hero can't ethically use their power on anyone except for monsters that deserve obliteration. So they basically can't use their best weapon on most of the street-level thugs in their rogues' gallery. On top of that, their power would pose a massive hazard to nearby citizens, and it would be guaranteed to demolish infrastructure in dangerous and costly ways. As such, this hero would have a trump card in their pocket during every fight - but they'd also have to worry about the ramifications of using it. I think that's much more interesting than green rocks.
I’m sure all superheroes are flawed since one cannot achieve true perfection. But villains tend to complain about superheroes when they can’t find flaws for them to exploit.
Are those his only weaknesses? Because if it is then... He's pretty overpowered. If he can deal with those weaknesses, he'll be a literal god amongst men.
I want whatever device that guy has that allows him to fight literal Superheroes without being affected by any of his weaknesses by almost straight up curing them. Itd be great to have during work so my back pain can finally go away until Turned off.
I like the idea that he's had to work against all these crippling weaknesses all his life and has gotten to the point he can swing with the best of them despite not just being not special, but actively held back
The fact he has all of those "weaknesses" and is still able to go h2h with a superman expy makes me think that he is the one who is overpowered and no fun to follow in general.
While it’s easy to sympathize with the villain here… the hero also has a sad life. This villain is all he has, he needs him. The villain is the only person who tries to be his peer. It’s lonely at the top, but this villain is a hero to the hero. He makes his life less lonely.
The villian sounds more like he needs to be in a hospital for several surgeries. I prefere the hero's weakness to be limited to his powers and struggles to use it or limit it while they are trying to overcome everything else as a normal. Powers don't usually cover everything.
Just a reminder, the term "superhero" is co-trademarked by dc-comics and marvel. If you see companies using it, they technically can be sued. If a content creation company from the US uses it, just pray one of the thousands of people who watch your vids don't work for one of the companies, and pray they aren't trying to get a promotion.
How could he know that stairs were my only weakness? Right next to electrocution, explosions, gunfire, rust, corrosion, being kicked a lot, viruses, being called bad names, falling from great heights, drowning, adult onset diabetes, being looked at funny, heart attacks, exposure to oxygen, being turned down by a woman, and pet allergens
Someone actually made the skit Zach hadel wanted to see when he said 'I just want to see a video with a guy on screen and he just sits there for a minute naming everything wrong with him'
The Hero: Built Different
The Villian: Built Incorrectly
Who's to say who's the villain?
Built WRONG
"I'm not built different built straight wrong. I am built incorrectly. Not following the normal parameters. I am built stupid."
@@foxmask8032 Hello bajur watcher.
That’s just the plot to unbreakable
Color blue sounds like a joke till you realize the superhero’s costume is just monotone blue
Also the Green Lantern's weakness is yellow (seriously)
@@SpammingYwell for a bit, it’s cause the parralax entity was inside the lantern core screwing everything up
The villains own helmet is even blue
@@gamerboi9561people always bring this up, but like GL was fully created and formed as a character with his primary weakness being yellow, like yes they retconned it but still a goofy moment in comics to point out
@@SpammingYbecame not canon some years ago, funny gag but not consistant as the writers said
The voice cracking when he's talking about the old people is hilarious
Leave it to Sokka to be hilarious
@@Vasun05no way is that him?
@@wbk1394 yup
I thought he looked familiar. I've seen him with less hair, so I almost wrote him off as a look alike. Thanks for confirming! 😄👍
@@ShovelChef You're welcome
“ a bit of a hypochondriac that holds me back”. Love these guys. So funny.
no joke. a character riddled with weaknesses going toe to toe with an invincible enemy sounds awesome to watch.
Megamind
@@JustAGuyYaHear true and the original is a masterpiece.
@@TheBlackwolf5011 wym original? it's the only megamind media we have _right_
@@Vekcrazah Nah, we've also got that like ten minute short about Megamind accidentally activating one of his killing robots by accident (after selling most of his evil inventions)
"The Boys"
The mention of benign positional vertigo got me! I’ve had it and it sucks!
When did it stop?
@@airplanes_aren.t_real When you get the calcified particles out of the balance coils in your ear. I looked up "how to do the Epley Maneuver at Home" online. You basically lie down and rotate from one side to the other at a specific angle and stopping in specific positions. This rolls the particles out of the balance spiral of your ear. It worked.
(Much better than my dr's suggestion, which was to sit on a bed and throw myself violently from side to side - which made me dizzy and nauseous. I'm very thankful to the audiologist who suggested the Epley Manuever!)
Ugh, I know! Mine comes and goes. It drives me up the wall when people call it a “little bit dizzy” though lol. I get nauseous because my brains acting like it’s on a damn roller coaster while I’m curled up in bed. I hate it. And you’d think closer your eyes would help, but nope!
Ugh, again. Stupid vertigo.
@@airplanes_aren.t_realI occasionally get it when trying to sleep. Have you seen the medical “exercises” online? They’re really simple. A couple actually helped me out with the positional vertigo; unfortunately, they rarely help when my vertigo is triggered by something else- like meds- but in my opinion, it’s worth a try!
@@j_g9109One of your comments got shadow censored by UA-cam but fortunately the UA-cam mobile app has the function of looking through a person's recent comments on a certain channel's comment section if you click a commenters pfp so I still read it.
Hopefully you get healed from your conditions someday if it's possible or becomes possible...idk if I'm gonna be able to be healed from my tinnitus since I don't know what caused it yet and whether I can recover and become tinnitus-free again somehow.
They called me Mr. Glass
This.
At least Mr. Glass was able to hire a pimp to do the dirty work
@@PowerPandaModsThat.
Oh nah M. Night Shyamalan is here
1000th like
You know the color blue sounds funny until you remember that…that was once green lantern’s weakness…the color yellow
Yellow.
The colour yellow was their weakness
@@sudanemamimikiki1527 yeah I meant to say that
and look at the heros outfit 💀
And wood originally.
@@lukeleary1333Wood was never glc weakness, only one person has ever had it as a weakness as just after he got his powers he got hit by a bat and thought the ring couldn't affect wood, this making it true for him specifically.
Obtuse, rubber goose, green moose, guava juice, giant snake, birthday cake, large fries, chocolate shake
Dude lmao
Don't copy comments
@@AMinecraftEngineerOr what? Didn't realize there's copyright infringement on comments. Or that people trademark them.
@@AMinecraftEngineer oh god the LAME enforcement's here
@@AMinecraftEngineerHow many times do you think somebody has said that. You stop copying comments.
I love the idea of a villain putting in a ton of work to come up with devious schemes that can provide an interesting challenge to an overpowered superhero, being upset that the hero never seems to match his enthusiasm for novelty or appreciate his dedication to a job well done.
Sounds like the Joker
or mega mind
And dedication is an understatement. Guy has like a dozen weaknesses and physical ailments and still manages a jumbo jet swordfight.
This, like, if I *I* put in the effort to make YOU suffer, then you gotta learn to appreciate it GODDAMNIT-!
Literally OG Megamind. Rip that though.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Jack's ability to do funny, self-serious bosses/guy in charge type characters is _unparalleled_ and Chris always plays against those characters perfectly, immaculate pairing, love these guys, no notes, would binge every sketch again
Jack De Sena?
Most of this wasn’t in the original video, and it makes me so happy to see people using shorts to publish bits that didn’t otherwise make the final cut
Original video?
I've never seen either of these?
Where is it from if I may ask?
@Luredreier on this channel
"Its lame, its unfair, you need to be nerfed" sounded like trump there
in case anyone didn't know, I'm talking about the voice itself, not the actual words
I was looking for this.
Nice pfp :)
I hear it now
I absolutely heard that too and came to mention it
"We are going to make hero fights great again"
-dev team before nerfs
I still want a sequel to this one........somehow.
The hero should come back to the villain and try to list his new thought out "weaknesses" that are actually just other ways that make him incredible. Just accidentally rubbing it in no matter what he says and just makes it worse and depresseses the villain so badly he retires.
Did you know that Superman didn’t have a weakness for decades. They only gave him a weakness because sales were falling.
@@ryansmith-jr4gn Are you talking about Dorothy Woolfolk when she announced that in 1993? Yeah, I guess. The first time it was introduced it was said to weaken Superman and give powers to humans. The idea was scrapped because it seemed dumb at the time. Then they came up with it later on ‘51 and only used the idea when it seemed beneficial to them (taking a vacation, when to expand on the idea, revealing to Lois Lane that he is Superman, etc.).
If you want we can just keep quoting Wikipedia or we can leave it alone.
@jasbdmsb I'm pretty sure it's just common trivia knowledge that kryptonite first appeared in the radio show, and the rest was just him fact checking himself and adding useful additional info.
But what's really important to me is pointing out that your reply reads as you acting all superior, yet this guy *did* correct you because you *were* wrong. AND you're the one that decided to start quoting Wikipedia to his reply (which, yes he probably fact checked himself with Wikipedia or something else). And then you're like "or can we leave it alone", which I feel implies that this guy wasn't leaving it alone, but really he just swooped in, corrected something and left. So it really does feel like you just wanted to have the last word
Now, I suppose there's the possibility of there being deleted comments that I didn't see, but if that were the case, I'd expect more than just the 2 replies total.
@@S_Sense I love how you like to call my actions pompous and arrogant because I fact checked myself; however, when the other person fact checked himself and me you like to dismiss it because the virtuous thing to do is attack the arrogant one. I love that because it makes you sound like a hypocrite without you even knowing because it only serves to help your argument despite it hurting most of your speech.
What I don’t like is that you said this is REALLY important to you almost implying that you cannot wait to address this comment.
He didn’t correct me because the information brought forward by both of us was true. Kryptonite was brought up several years after his creation, but the only reason for it was to relieve the voice actor and allow him to take a break (either it was a vacation or his voice was bad). The other time, if you read, was to weaken Superman and simultaneously give powers to other humans. Why doesn’t it do that now? It doesn’t do that now because they scrapped the idea of him having a weakness and only reintroduced it for the story to make sense, canonically, as well as help Superman seem more relatable instead of being an unlikeable hero. Basically, Superman was the conclusion character: “…and then Superman showed up and they lived happily ever after. The End.” He had no weaknesses, and as I explained earlier he Kryptonite wasn’t ESTABLISHED as his actual, canonical, weakness until 1993. Kryptonite may have shown up throughout the years, sporadically, but it wasn’t an official idea.
Heroes need weaknesses in order to become likeable otherwise they just turn into a spoof, unlikeable, boring character that isn’t relatable.
Lastly, I don’t think the person I was speaking to would do something as lowly as delete a comment even if what they said only hurt their argument. I wouldn’t delete my comments either for that reason even if I look like a jackass to everyone. The only time I would be guilty of deleting a comment is if I thought it was funny, I posted it, read it, and realized it was lame or if the comment lacked anything at all. You might think this comment lacks substance but that’s probably because you don’t like me, personally, even though we never met. I mean, you made a hypocrite of yourself when you were mad when I fact checked myself, but it’s perfectly fine if someone else were to do it. That makes it a personal attack rather than an unbiased one. 🤪 All jokes aside I hope you read through all of this comment instead of reading bits and pieces like you did for my previous comment.
@@S_Sense I forgot one thing, the reason why I said what I said at the end was because it was pointless to say what everyone else can read on Wikipedia. Why do you think I specifically said that it was on Wikipedia? Why wasn’t it said in their comment? I made sure to read the article too and said what I said. If anything I was willing to talk more about what wasn’t written on Wikipedia hoping to hear what they had to say. I didn’t say something like, “shut up,” even though it could be misinterpreted as that.
@@jasbdmsb Hello. First half of this is about the stuff you said about me specifically, part is how you're wrong.
- I didn't call your actions pompous and arrogant. So the stuff you said based on that is wrong.
- My word choice of "really" was the use of it that is synonymous with "actually". I was using it to dismiss the first part of what I said as merely a passing, and not all that important thought.
- I didn't say you were acting superior because you fact checked yourself. I quite explicitly pointed out the parts, and it was on the language you were using.
- I haven't been mad. Think about it logically, at that point you hadn't said anything to me, and I kept everything quite brief. So out of the 2 of us, who would be mad? Even in this I've been quite systematic, keeping feelings from fact.
- I think think possibly you're projecting, considering: You wrote so much to seem like a victim, how much you wanted to call me a hypocrite, you saying you felt attacked, you just adding in stuff I didn't say, and the use of this emoji 🤪, the use of "I love" followed by something bad, .
I mean, we could look at what would have happened if you weren't mad and didn't let your feelings take over. It would have been something like this "oh, this is what I actually meant, there's been a misunderstanding. also I don't think anything I said was incorrect, could you explain why you think I've been corrected?" So basically just the extra comment you added on the end with a sensible question, instead of blind defensiveness. And that example I gave is just 1 way you could have denied being wrong, while clearing up thoughts on you, while also not having to just assume stuff about me or just add in stuff I didn't say.
-Also, I said about the wiki stuff because you brought it up in the same sentence as something you've just admitted could be misinterpreted as a "shut up" statement.
As a summery: I said you seemed to be acting superior, despite being corrected. You felt hurt by me saying that that so you looked for a bunch of subtext in what I said, but I kept what I wrote brief so you had to add some of your own to what I said. (and acting superior is very different to being pompous and arrogant. in case you wanted to add that in).
If we are to continue this talk in the comment section, I suggest we make a small truce, and no longer talk about each other. We can talk about the facts about superman comics, and you can clear up the things you think I've gotten wrong about you here in this first part, and I could even talk about myself if I wanted to. How does that sound? I started work on it already, even. I shut down what you got wrong about me, and confined things specifically about you to just the summery and the parts around you projecting.
2nd part:
yes. 2 people can say things that can be true at the same time, but that's not what happened here. He did, in fact, correct you.
Your first comment says "Superman didn’t have a weakness for decades", which can't be true at the same time as superman having a weakness in the comics 11 years after his creation (in 1949). 11 years =/= decades. (that was just me retelling you what he said and now for me to add my own info). And it very much was a weakness. Even after that, it continued to appear in the 50s as his established weakness (the 50s were only 12 years after his creation). Even if we go with your idea that it was sporadic (even though after 1950, it's use steadily increased over time), it was still established in the comics.
I think you've possibly mixed up information on Kryptonite and K-metal which was an unreleased thing from 1940 (2 years after superman). Because the 1993 time that you have is just when the interview took place. But Kyptonite being his weakness was a well established thing in the comics well before that interview ever took place.
And just to be absolutely clear, so you don't go off on another tangent that isn't relevant to what I said (referring to you explaining why characters need flaws), The specific thing I'm saying you got wrong is "Superman didn’t have a weakness for decades" because it took less than a decade and a half for him to be given a weakness in the source material.
"Whole life like a video game"
"You need to be nerfed"
😂
“My life like a video game”
“Trying hard to beat the stage”
"your no fun to fight against"
**meanwhile megamind having the time of his life fighting an immortal god knowing he'll lose**
Megamind never intended/expected to win those fights.
Loved that movie!
@@r.s.2890 Yeah, I love his reaction after "winning", too. Homie embodied Joker's quote of: "I wouldn't even know what to do if I caught you [Batman], I'm just like a dog chasing a car, what would I do if I got it?! I don't know!"
"... gluten, wednesdays, bright lights, people named Jebedia, cat hair, flowers, standing up ..."
“What a waste man. You’re no fun to fight against.” -the Super Villain equivalent of “I’m not mad, just disappointed”
If I was the superhero, I would be GUTTED.
Trump: “Lame, unfair and you need to be nerfed”
Cope and seethe.
@@Zellonous Ligma
@@Zellonoussomeone’s triggered?
@@Zellonoushe lost. That makes him a loser😂
@@trx4957 Trump is gonna win filth
Lmao I love these bits of unreleased footage
"Well, what are *your* weaknesses." "Well, I shouldn't tell you this, but molybdenum gives me a slight itching sensation. Really ruins my day."
These videos got better when i heard him do the sokka voice. They were good before, but better with knowledge
“ThE cOlOuR bLuE!” YO FIRST TIME MORR THAN 2 PPL LIKED MY COMMENT
"It's like I spend my whole life playing a video game, that didn't have an ending" Deeply felt that :(
“Lame… not that fun and… you need to be nerf’d” 😂😂💀
Certified homelander moment
A hero with no weaknesses is not no fun. At that point its not a matter of testing what can they survive. It a matter of putting them in scenarios where they can easily choose to do evil yet choose to do good instead.
The point is to test the heroic nature
You’re right but I think you’re taking a bit further than needed hahaha but you are still right
You got a point
Best and most meaningful stories are written not on the verge of “can they”, but “should they”.
Ok, a superhero needs a weakness but it’s better if the weakness is an unfortunate side effect of their power that you don’t think of at first instead of something arbitrary like a rare crystal.
100%
“Rare my ass! A purse snatcher I picked up last week had like 12 of them!” - Batman, Solid JJ
All that matters is that they have that actually weakens them. What your suggesting just sounds like a consequence not a weakness.
@@TheTideKing004 I mean, if you're a good superhero who tries to protect people, then any complication to the goals of protecting yourself, civilians, and infrastructure counts as an exploitable weakness.
If your superpower was the ability to create and control a miniature sun that plasmises everything in a 30 foot radius, then I'd call that a real liability for mitigating damage. There's no room for nonlethal takedowns if using your power means vaporizing your opponent. That means this hero can't ethically use their power on anyone except for monsters that deserve obliteration. So they basically can't use their best weapon on most of the street-level thugs in their rogues' gallery. On top of that, their power would pose a massive hazard to nearby citizens, and it would be guaranteed to demolish infrastructure in dangerous and costly ways. As such, this hero would have a trump card in their pocket during every fight - but they'd also have to worry about the ramifications of using it. I think that's much more interesting than green rocks.
@Drekromancer no that isn't a weakness. That is a moral hangup. A weakness would be like bullets to humans, something that your actually weake to.
"Benign positional vertigo" proceeds to bring up the fight on an unbalanced jet
I’m sure all superheroes are flawed since one cannot achieve true perfection. But villains tend to complain about superheroes when they can’t find flaws for them to exploit.
This guy sounds like me. My body is like a house of cards, someone breathes wrong in my presence and my body crumbles...
Even when you've crumbled though you got right back up and marched on, keep it up man.
@@theepicspy570 Thanks man, I'm really trying.
Props to the villain for doing it anyway despite the numerous weaknesses.
Are those his only weaknesses? Because if it is then... He's pretty overpowered. If he can deal with those weaknesses, he'll be a literal god amongst men.
He's so defensive "I, am fun to fight!"
“It’s lame, It’s unfair, and you need to be nerfed”
Lol
He won me over with the age old demand of many mortals across worlds: you need to be nerfed
It sound like a story telling problem if how hard the battle is is how you judge the quality of a character.
“Old people realize a dream wrecks me” quote I’ll never forget.
there are many webpages, that are "list of phobias", and he has all of them.
Imagine having no weakness and beating up a cripple
Friendly reminder that the weakness guy is literally sokka
Except he is "literally" not.
@@craigjomaia bro its not 1966 accept the fact that the word literally changed it's meaning ok?
The idea that a hero with no weaknesses would be boring is why kryptonite was introduced as a weakness for Superman.
Bro is so funny. He should consider voicing a character from a tribe of water people that's helping a bald kid beat the shit out of an evil fire guy.
I want whatever device that guy has that allows him to fight literal Superheroes without being affected by any of his weaknesses by almost straight up curing them. Itd be great to have during work so my back pain can finally go away until Turned off.
this felt like CL4P-TP listing his weaknesses
Thanks for making shorts! More people should know of this, and the clips help
As a docror I lost it, when he listed the BPV as one of his weakneses 😅
"Its lame and unfair...and you need to be nerfed." XD
“That’s lame, and unfair, and you need to be nerfed” 😂😂😂
I like the idea that he's had to work against all these crippling weaknesses all his life and has gotten to the point he can swing with the best of them despite not just being not special, but actively held back
The fact he has all of those "weaknesses" and is still able to go h2h with a superman expy makes me think that he is the one who is overpowered and no fun to follow in general.
While it’s easy to sympathize with the villain here… the hero also has a sad life. This villain is all he has, he needs him. The villain is the only person who tries to be his peer. It’s lonely at the top, but this villain is a hero to the hero. He makes his life less lonely.
bro got asked what his weaknesses were and started reciting the dictionary by memory
"Its lame, its unfair, you need to be nerfed"- that's gold
I have plantar fasciitis. I don’t see crutches so however he got there wasn’t on foot or pure suffering.
"Old people realizing a dream... wrecks me" is so real 😂😂😂
He sounds like he’s going back to sokka on cactus juice “it’s the quinchiest’
The fact he ain't dead yet proves he's a formidable foe for our hero.
Why hesoind like trump with a cold
The villian sounds more like he needs to be in a hospital for several surgeries. I prefere the hero's weakness to be limited to his powers and struggles to use it or limit it while they are trying to overcome everything else as a normal. Powers don't usually cover everything.
Harry Dubios
There's a joke about 11 people will get.
Detective.
This is just the plot of Unbreakable
Just a reminder, the term "superhero" is co-trademarked by dc-comics and marvel. If you see companies using it, they technically can be sued. If a content creation company from the US uses it, just pray one of the thousands of people who watch your vids don't work for one of the companies, and pray they aren't trying to get a promotion.
«Just a reminder» that the use of branded names is not prohibited by law when it comes to parodies.
“It’s like my life’s a video game, and i’ve just been here trying hard to beat the stage.”
He sounds like Donald trump lol
Get your ears checked lol
@@JS-ol4dxhis last line is delivered with the same cadence that Trump often used during speeches.
@@JS-ol4dxDude sounds like trump
@@JS-ol4dx yea I was talking about the last line
Finally, people realizing it's not fun to play against overpowered opponent
Meanwhile, One Punch Man...
Wow to have everything as your weakness and still be seen as a nemesis is a pretty big achievement
This guy sounds like he could use some cactus juice.
How could he know that stairs were my only weakness? Right next to electrocution, explosions, gunfire, rust, corrosion, being kicked a lot, viruses, being called bad names, falling from great heights, drowning, adult onset diabetes, being looked at funny, heart attacks, exposure to oxygen, being turned down by a woman, and pet allergens
Blue is the warmest colour
Imagine being like a thousand times weaker than a normal human being and still beating the superhero
The fact that the villian is keeping up with the hero and he is just a slightly debuffed dude is crazy
This guy has huge skill, he survived this long with all these weaknesses
“Old people realising a dream *wrecks me”*
"Old people realizing a dream, wrecks me"
My man, we gotta talk about that insecurity
Someone actually made the skit Zach hadel wanted to see when he said 'I just want to see a video with a guy on screen and he just sits there for a minute naming everything wrong with him'
Oh, i feel you on the vertigo. Ive bonked my head too much and now i randomly have it feel like everything is 15 - 45 degrees from norm
Deadpool variant confirmed
Crip gang is this man's weakness
it would be hilarious to have a person with completely ultimate power, but with a ridiculous and common weakness.
This channel has made a holiday out of my birthday and now it’s representing my BPPV, what kind of demographic analysts did you guys hire?
My life is like a video game trying hard to beat the stage all while I’m still collecting coins.
I’m always on the side of “Make Superhero’s be regular guys with powers, they don’t need incredible durability or anything else.”
No! You discovered my ONLY weakness! Being inconvenienced in any way!!
"It's lame. And unfair. And you need to be nerfed." Fuking got me 😂🤣
"Its lame, its unfair, you need to be nerfed." Sums up batman and superman
“Old people realizing a dream wrecks me”
Ahah "and.. you need to be nerfed" rly took me by surprise 😅
At this point, he should just quit and be a good citizen.😂😂😂
Me when I realize I cannot stand, sit or lay down without experiencing pain:
“It was LAME, and UNFAIR!…you need to be nerfed…!”😂
That’s cool basically the same exact humor and delivery as Tom robinson but hey go for it
If it works it works right
So he's just a regular dude
Either I'm proven right or I'm proven wrong in my favor. Your move universe
How it feel playing any soulsborne game
Some of this wasn’t in the video. These shorts are showing us deleted scenes and unused content! That’s awesome!
You can hear the sokka coming through in his voice