It's the same with Judge Judy and Judge Mathis. If JM determines that you're a crackhead then he will constantly refer to you as a crackhead throughout the case.
Yeah!! Even if SHE’s WRONG WHICH IS PRETTY OFTEN! But hey, when “your highness” makes up her mind after someone disagrees with her, you’re right, “case over”!!! (sooo ridiculous & immature”!!!) 😮
Judge Milan seems to not understand that taking a day off of work to testify as a witness is a huge deal for a lot of people. Missing a day of work can be the difference in you being able to pay your rent that month. Or can cause financial strain.
An employee is entitled to paid time off without charge to leave for service as a juror or witness. So that’s not a good enough excuse. The witness didn’t want to be there because the defendant thinks his lies would be stronger coming from just himself than have someone fumble the case on his behalf
@@M2161 i think you’re misinformed, not all employees receive paid time off for jury duty. Maybe your employer pays. But mine in California does not. And the stipend for jury duty is like $15-20 PER DAY. So I’m not sure where you’re getting that “entitled” from.
@@travisbickle1552 hi! Attached is the link to The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which serves as the chief human resources agency and personnel policy manager for the Federal Government. Which is where I found very clearly stated info. www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/leave-administration/fact-sheets/court-leave/#:~:text=An%20employee%20is%20entitled%20to,substantial%20part%20of%20a%20day
In this case I feel the defendant wasn't given the opportunity to fairly plead his side. The plantiff could have got the photos once printed and gave them to the guests.
The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
But the main point of the booth is to get them that day at the event (and laugh and show people…). She’s right that they have the photographer for photos later
@@simonc1039she has literally ruled against her own before please. I’ve seen cases where she literally shouted at them in Spanish because things wasn’t going their way stop it 😂
@@simonc1039 every judge has talking over people, interrupted people and yelled at them. She said something to both of them for not having their statements notarized. She even interrupted with the plaintiffs how she acted in. This case is nothing new. If the Ma home took the pictures and it was present at the party when they packed up the mother could’ve gotten them. They were brought to court instead.
$2300 for pictures! should have taken that and bought her a nice used car! my wedding pictures where taken by others and those were in my wedding photo album. my whole wedding was $2300 with a horse and carriage. Wedding not a birthday party that's all it is! ridiculous in my book.
The guy had many chances and always kept it all vague, so the judges patience wore thin. The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
It's rare, but I must disagree with Honorable Judge Milian's verdict. I don't think she gave the defendant adequate opportunity to present the technical evidence.
The judge got emotional and stopped listening, he clearly said the pictures printed out and were sitting on the printer but all she heard was the picture were in the computer which is not what he said.
I don't know why people keep saying this. You're missing the point of a photobooth. It prints pictures immediately and adds decorations etc to make a souvenir. Something to take away from the event. Of course everyone had mobiles to take pictures and do selfies, that's not the point. Photobooths are hugely popular. Do you go to a wedding and say why do they need a photographer when everyone has a mobile phone and could just take the pictures? of course not. It's something different.
The guy had many chances and always kept it all vague, so the judges patience wore thin. The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
Why isn't he here? He had to go to work.....This is pretty important. He couldn't take the day off?.....um, the day you award lost wages will be the day that someone can afford to guest star on your important TV show. Until then, there's rent, bills, food, child care, medical expenses, etc that are a bit more important than the ego trip of being on a TV show.
That defendant didn't pay for day away from work and instead gave lame unnotarized statement from the worker that anybody could have typed up weakened his case significantly
The guy had many chances and always kept it all vague, so the judges patience wore thin. The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
How does a photo booth not working equal $700 back? And Doug trying to defend the judge cutting the guy off when he actually had something to say that may have changed the outcome is just bs.
Doug just likes to stir the pot, lol. The guy actually did get his statement out but the judge heard something else and got immediately upset so her ears shut down.lol
Wow, there have been some cases that I have seen her loose her cool at. But this is by far one of the worse ones. Nobody was being rude but her. She definitely was not listening. And she still yelled at him saying "do you hear yourself?" I like it when she yells at people who deserve it but this guy did not. At this point they are just paying her to yell at everyone.
She didn't listen. If the printing of the photos was DELAYED but that once the booth was back up and running and the prints were then made and printed while the party was still happening, then there was only the 1-1.5 hour reduction in use of the booth. JMM was not listening.
I would strongly suggest the defendant not get too rude with the plaintiff or her boyfriend. That dude looks like he could handle some business in short order!
I don't know why people keep saying this. You're missing the point of a photobooth. It prints pictures immediately and adds decorations etc to make a souvenir. Something to take away from the event. Of course everyone had mobiles to take pictures and do selfies, that's not the point. Photobooths are hugely popular. Do you go to a wedding and say why do they need a photographer when everyone has a mobile phone and could just take the pictures? of course not. It's something different.
The guy had many chances and always kept it all vague, so the judges patience wore thin. The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
He should’ve just had better customer service. Blaming them for equipment failing. Sometimes things fail and you just have to make it right for the customer
The Plaintiff had a letter from someone stating "no one bum touched this man". That is definitely someone writing a letter where they are told what to "say". The Judge was a bit too short tempered with the Defendant and a bit too reliant on un-notarized, obviously made up statements. If she's going to make up her mind about a case while going over the evidence pretrial, she needs to hide it better.
Affidavits are available to be used in court for a reason. If people can’t afford to take the day off to testify and write an affidavit, I don’t know why she always makes it seem like it’s so bad they aren’t physically there. I love Judge Milian but that personally always ticks me off
Once the phone booth stopped working then one of the parents should've taken out his/her iPhone and declared that he was the official phone booth photographer and had people posed in front of him. Problem solved.
The plaintiffs boyfriend , his hair cut is solid as gold. Meanwhile , I’m concerned about the barbershop industry if you let your customer walk out looking like this . 👩🏽🤦🏾♀️🙏🏾 Genuinely !
I have to totally agree, that when JM gets an attitude about someone, case closed. I've seen it happen many times. She doesn't listen, she talks over them and she doesn't even come close to letting them plead their case. She was a jerk! Nuff said.
The reason the judge ruled for the plaintiffs due to the person at the booth not being there for the suit. The defendant is testifying what was told to him which makes it hearsay due to the paperwork not being an actual affidavit. I had to recant what I wrote previously.
The judge is hispanic and i noticed she slightly sides with the hispanic litigants in most cases. I see this happen in most of her cases. Not a blatant bias but a slight bias.
Wait, defendant says the photo booth is fully automatic and doesn't need an operator, but there is a photobooth worker that got Bum rushed?? I'm confused
The worker was there to work on something else. In the beginning, the plaintiff’s boyfriend states that when the Photo Booth broke down, he had to go tell the worker to go fix the Photo Booth that’s when things get hectic because there was no one else to help handle the other stuff the worker was supposed to do while he was trying to fix the Photo Booth.
I get the defendant saying that the booth DID print out the pictures but if that were really the case, why not give them to her or even bring them to court to prove that they were printed. He lost this case because unlike the plantiff he had no proof of anything! He didn't have the MC with him, he didn't have messages proving it was back up and running, he didn't have the pictures. Is what it is, sorry to him if he is being honest
One thing about this judge when she gets something set in her mind case is over. She stops listening..
I agree
She goes over everything before the case and has already made her decision beforehand.
It's the same with Judge Judy and Judge Mathis. If JM determines that you're a crackhead then he will constantly refer to you as a crackhead throughout the case.
Yeah!! Even if SHE’s WRONG WHICH IS PRETTY OFTEN! But hey, when “your highness” makes up her mind after someone disagrees with her, you’re right, “case over”!!! (sooo ridiculous & immature”!!!) 😮
@@righttoouropinionthanks4710What was she wrong about? Dude had plenty of chances to prove his case.
Judge Milan seems to not understand that taking a day off of work to testify as a witness is a huge deal for a lot of people. Missing a day of work can be the difference in you being able to pay your rent that month. Or can cause financial strain.
An employee is entitled to paid time off without charge to leave for service as a juror or witness. So that’s not a good enough excuse. The witness didn’t want to be there because the defendant thinks his lies would be stronger coming from just himself than have someone fumble the case on his behalf
@@M2161lol where do you live? I’ve never been paid for jury duty and only 8 states force your employer to pay you anything.
@@Terrafire34I work at Airgas and they pay for jury duty and it doesn’t take from your PTO 😎
@@M2161 i think you’re misinformed, not all employees receive paid time off for jury duty. Maybe your employer pays. But mine in California does not. And the stipend for jury duty is like $15-20 PER DAY. So I’m not sure where you’re getting that “entitled” from.
@@travisbickle1552 hi! Attached is the link to The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which serves as the chief human resources agency and personnel policy manager for the Federal Government. Which is where I found very clearly stated info.
www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/leave-administration/fact-sheets/court-leave/#:~:text=An%20employee%20is%20entitled%20to,substantial%20part%20of%20a%20day
In this case I feel the defendant wasn't given the opportunity to fairly plead his side. The plantiff could have got the photos once printed and gave them to the guests.
The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
That's what Sara is saying here with me right now.
But the main point of the booth is to get them that day at the event (and laugh and show people…). She’s right that they have the photographer for photos later
@@simonc1039she has literally ruled against her own before please. I’ve seen cases where she literally shouted at them in Spanish because things wasn’t going their way stop it 😂
@@simonc1039 every judge has talking over people, interrupted people and yelled at them. She said something to both of them for not having their statements notarized. She even interrupted with the plaintiffs how she acted in. This case is nothing new. If the Ma home took the pictures and it was present at the party when they packed up the mother could’ve gotten them. They were brought to court instead.
Just shave it off man lol
PLZ!!!!
@@zuritribe4844that is the new style. its universall.
100%
Exactly…. Looks so ridiculous!
Nah hes emotionally attached to thise last few hangin on!!!
The way he’s holding on to those five strands of hair, 😂😂😂
😂😂😂😂
For real
Everyone has smartphones…take your own pics and collaborate to make a photo album
That’s not the point of a photo booth. They had a photographer for a photo album. The photo booth was for memories/a souvenir to take home…
$2300 for pictures! should have taken that and bought her a nice used car! my wedding pictures where taken by others and those were in my wedding photo album. my whole wedding was $2300 with a horse and carriage. Wedding not a birthday party that's all it is! ridiculous in my book.
@@kelrubino340 That was the TOTAL amount for a DJ, MC and the photobooth. The photobooth by itself was just $700.
JM was very aggressive with the defendant from the jump....
Always
Because he was annoying af
It’s the haircut… it gives unease feelings 😂
The guy had many chances and always kept it all vague, so the judges patience wore thin. The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
@@ugoddessthepoet cause you're a racist?
It's rare, but I must disagree with Honorable Judge Milian's verdict. I don't think she gave the defendant adequate opportunity to present the technical evidence.
Yeah, the judge 👩⚖️ can be a asshole sometimes 🙄
The judge got emotional and stopped listening, he clearly said the pictures printed out and were sitting on the printer but all she heard was the picture were in the computer which is not what he said.
A photo booth not workinging shouldn't ruin the whole party. That is ridiculous.
Sooooo…no Photobooth guy but there was a photobooth guy? Did I hear that wrong?
Yeah the defendant kept referring to the MC as the “photobooth worker” It threw me off too because they first said it was automated
The defendants hair tells me all I need to know about him 😂😂😂
Whatever hair the defendant is trying to spread out they look like veins.
😂😂
He should lose on that hair alone. 😂😂😂
Guilty
How funny this was the only party on planet Earth that night that nobody had a cel phone to take pictures.
I don't know why people keep saying this. You're missing the point of a photobooth. It prints pictures immediately and adds decorations etc to make a souvenir. Something to take away from the event. Of course everyone had mobiles to take pictures and do selfies, that's not the point. Photobooths are hugely popular. Do you go to a wedding and say why do they need a photographer when everyone has a mobile phone and could just take the pictures? of course not. It's something different.
She doesn’t seem to let people answer questions she asks them… like she acts like she knows what happened and she was there… and then Doug, oh Doug!
The guy had many chances and always kept it all vague, so the judges patience wore thin. The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
@@pep590Yea we got it the first time you made this comment 🤡
What do you mean? This is court, and you need proof. Would you rather people be allowed to sue based on their claims alone?!
Because people love to ramble on and not get to the point. If you let people talk and talk, the case would go on for hours.
poor husband and kids, surprised shes still married, lol
and i thought it was a party with fowls, only to realize it was a misspelling of foul
I'm disappointed that poultry was not involved in this case!
Why isn't he here? He had to go to work.....This is pretty important. He couldn't take the day off?.....um, the day you award lost wages will be the day that someone can afford to guest star on your important TV show. Until then, there's rent, bills, food, child care, medical expenses, etc that are a bit more important than the ego trip of being on a TV show.
Especially if I’m an independent contractor and I have no stake in the company
That defendant didn't pay for day away from work and instead gave lame unnotarized statement from the worker that anybody could have typed up weakened his case significantly
Everyone gets a $250 fee for being on this show. Quite sure that's more than what his attendant makes in a day.
So judge believes everything plaintiffs and witnesses say but doesn't believe a single thing defendant or mc says? How fair
IM SURE ITS HIS HAIR! SHE DOESN'T TRUST HIM BC OF IT!!! #JUST PLAYING
Probably cos their Latinos. She was putting words in his mouth.
@@captgaming2134naw she don’t give an ish about a person being Latino. Hell to me she’s more whitewashed 😂😂
The guy had many chances and always kept it all vague, so the judges patience wore thin. The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
i will say 95 % of time she is unfair,
How does a photo booth not working equal $700 back? And Doug trying to defend the judge cutting the guy off when he actually had something to say that may have changed the outcome is just bs.
This is why JJ doesn't take statements.
Photo booth rental goes for more than $700
Doug just likes to stir the pot, lol. The guy actually did get his statement out but the judge heard something else and got immediately upset so her ears shut down.lol
As soon as she figured they’re Hispanic we knew it was all over for the defendant 😂 he had a strong case if she would’ve listened
I wasn’t sure if that was hair or a blood mark like Gorbachev had.
Wow, there have been some cases that I have seen her loose her cool at. But this is by far one of the worse ones. Nobody was being rude but her. She definitely was not listening. And she still yelled at him saying "do you hear yourself?" I like it when she yells at people who deserve it but this guy did not. At this point they are just paying her to yell at everyone.
This judge should not be a judge. She is a drama queen who is not interested in the truth.
She didn't listen. If the printing of the photos was DELAYED but that once the booth was back up and running and the prints were then made and printed while the party was still happening, then there was only the 1-1.5 hour reduction in use of the booth. JMM was not listening.
Surprised JM doesn't know what bum rush means...
Me too
It’s a vague description. We shouldn’t be left to fill in the gaps and it should accurately and succinctly describe the action that took place
@TaiLegend OK lol!!!
she knows damn well what it means. 🙄
I can’t imagine that these people have to have pictures in order for them to have a good time. That’s what you have your memory for lol
I cant imagine spending thousands of dollars on a sweet sixteen when the kid graduates two years later. Spoiled!
It's tradition. Cultural custom.
Judge was DEAD WRONG . Didn’t even let the man talk. She was already on the plaintiff’s side
Dude didn’t have a chance as soon as he walked into the courtroom… She had her mind made up. She’s not listening as usual. Ewwww!
Don't cry little boy. it will be ok.
@@pep590 little boy? Go troll your mom…
@@pep590 Eat it pep!
@@pep590 eat it again
@@pep590she isn't going to sleep with you because of a UA-cam comment. Relax kiddo.
I would strongly suggest the defendant not get too rude with the plaintiff or her boyfriend. That dude looks like he could handle some business in short order!
lol!!!
What YEAR was this episode first broadcast that EVERY GUEST at a party don't have cellphones to take pictures at the party?!!!
What does that have anything to do with this guy not providing a working photo booth 🤔
I don't know why people keep saying this. You're missing the point of a photobooth. It prints pictures immediately and adds decorations etc to make a souvenir. Something to take away from the event. Of course everyone had mobiles to take pictures and do selfies, that's not the point. Photobooths are hugely popular. Do you go to a wedding and say why do they need a photographer when everyone has a mobile phone and could just take the pictures? of course not. It's something different.
1987😂
Judge is, very often biased. It's rediculous 😢
This judge has no interest in hearing testimony from the defendant.
Squiggy lives! Don't even have to close your 👀👀. Just take a listen. LOL IMO.
The defendant didn't expect to be sued, let alone lose. I wonder how many other times this has happened 🤔
They just were money hungry… of course the judge was off on this one 🙄🙄🙄
The guy had many chances and always kept it all vague, so the judges patience wore thin. The defendant should have picked up the photos and given them to the woman, if he knew they had printed after all of that chaos. Not expect her to know that after everything was broken, to now go back over to the printer and see if your photos are there. He didn't do that and that added to his loss. The defendant just does the minimum, which is fine, if all goes well. You can tell he is not big on customer service.
@@pep590 no she didn’t want the photos! Again money hungry shame on them 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
Just take your own pictures. It's not 1902.
"This letter isn't even notarized!"
I guess the rules are relaxed when it's convenient.
I find the defendants “hair cut” guilty! Also his barber… guilty ! 👩🏽🤣🤣🤣
5:47 Voice did not match the kid 🤔
Once puberty hits he's gonna be a monster
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 girl he sound like he was 3 or 4 years old!!
The upward inflection is killing me from the damn defendant 😂😂😂
He should’ve just had better customer service. Blaming them for equipment failing. Sometimes things fail and you just have to make it right for the customer
She goes heard for her own ppl
The defendant should be sued for that hair alone!!!
He was and he lost that case, too.
I have been to many events with the photo booth and the props.
They're fun and are memorable from partying nights.
The Defendant ends every sentence on a high note....
What in the "roach antennas" is going on with the defendant's hair? Sir just NO 🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️
The Plaintiff had a letter from someone stating "no one bum touched this man". That is definitely someone writing a letter where they are told what to "say". The Judge was a bit too short tempered with the Defendant and a bit too reliant on un-notarized, obviously made up statements. If she's going to make up her mind about a case while going over the evidence pretrial, she needs to hide it better.
Lmao. Nobody ever personally requested him 😂😂
That man is trying to hold onto his hair for dear life. My guy made bangs out of it.
His voice. The way everything rises and cracks at the end… it sounds like he’s a child asking a question every sentence he makes.
I was distracted by the defendants hair.😳 LET IT GO MAN😢
His voice cracking 😂
lol
The judge should listen to herself. What an AH.
The defendant's constant inflection at the end of almost every sentence regarding the party tells me he's a liar. That's a classic tell.
Affidavits are available to be used in court for a reason. If people can’t afford to take the day off to testify and write an affidavit, I don’t know why she always makes it seem like it’s so bad they aren’t physically there. I love Judge Milian but that personally always ticks me off
defendant full of excuses
Pictures mean the world-Doug!
JM was completely unfair... Latinas stick together...
Lmao better than whites sticking together
We had enough of that
Man… defendant should pick A struggle…
Regarding the defendant's hair (lyrics from a famous Teddy Pedergrass song) "I think I better let it go..."
JM: Ok, talk to me tell me what happened
“okay so…”
JM: WOAH WAIT WHAT DO YOU MEAN SO
I don’t think JM listened to the defendant enough but I do believe that the photo-booth was pretty much a lemon
It's sad lying is becoming the norm
This judge damn what an ass ! God help her husband, hopefully he hires out
She is so spiteful if she can't put on her show.
It did not ruin the party. Kids have cell phones now to take tons of pictures.
The only crime here is the defendants hair.
Preach! The choir is singing “guilty” with the “haircut”
👩🏽🤦🏾♀️🤣
The Defendant is insufferable and has one of the most annoying voices I’ve ever heard.
Once the phone booth stopped working then one of the parents should've taken out his/her iPhone and declared that he was the official phone booth photographer and had people posed in front of him. Problem solved.
exactly she was saying the party was ruined like every human is not walking around with a camera in their pocket
She should have held him in contempt of court just for that hairstyle😂😂😂😂😂
Defendant looks like the one cop from Barney Miller .
Nobody is picking up photos after the party, and disturbing them to the guests. They are pretty worthless. Good ruling.
Her boy friend came in lying so the judge should have taken that in account
Well that was ridiculous.
I agree with the young man outside who said, "if they had fun, screw the photos"! Not in those exact words, but you know what I'm sayin'!
The defendant looks like he owns an unmarked white van.. creepy
Or an old camper full with junk.
I literally hollered! 😂😂😂
Where ever there's a unmarked van there's a creepy man😂😂
Why would he comb his strands of hair forward???
The plaintiffs boyfriend , his hair cut is solid as gold.
Meanwhile , I’m concerned about the barbershop industry if you let your customer walk out looking like this . 👩🏽🤦🏾♀️🙏🏾
Genuinely !
I have to totally agree, that when JM gets an attitude about someone, case closed. I've seen it happen many times. She doesn't listen, she talks over them and she doesn't even come close to letting them plead their case. She was a jerk! Nuff said.
Why would the defendant come on national television with his hair looking like that?😂💀
Hes a woke democrate.☺
@@AlbertoThecheater ………….your comment tells me all I need to know about your intelligence level
@@AlbertoThecheater your comment tells me all I need to know about your intelligence
@@2LitProduction ohhh nooo are you gonna make a hashtag???? Wave your rainbrow pride parade oh nooooo im so terrified
@@AlbertoThecheater ……….are u okay? Seems like you need to log off the internet and touch grass
If she said it ruin the party, it ruin the party 🙄🙄 so annoying
The reason the judge ruled for the plaintiffs due to the person at the booth not being there for the suit. The defendant is testifying what was told to him which makes it hearsay due to the paperwork not being an actual affidavit. I had to recant what I wrote previously.
The judge is hispanic and i noticed she slightly sides with the hispanic litigants in most cases. I see this happen in most of her cases. Not a blatant bias but a slight bias.
..... loving the defendant's bangs! 😁
Correction :: bang.. no bangs to be had here . I wish he did the side bang.
Thing is , he has a fresh haircut.
Hush ! 😂👩🏽🙏🏾
the defendant's VOICE...so awful
“Ruined the party” Give me a break. They need to get their heads out of their asses
not to worry, all of us from Eastern Europe and the Mediterranean are way late as well. But the party goes VERY late as well.
Something tells me the defendant likes to hold on to things that are no longer his
Wait, defendant says the photo booth is fully automatic and doesn't need an operator, but there is a photobooth worker that got Bum rushed?? I'm confused
he would make a great used car saleman.
The worker was there to work on something else. In the beginning, the plaintiff’s boyfriend states that when the Photo Booth broke down, he had to go tell the worker to go fix the Photo Booth that’s when things get hectic because there was no one else to help handle the other stuff the worker was supposed to do while he was trying to fix the Photo Booth.
Did you watch Dumbo? He's there to put in emails if they want so they can get it online. Otherwise they didn't use him.
The judge says shes punctual but she was late getting on the bench
Okay, what's up with the defendant and his hair? Looks stupid.
Fowl vs foul
I don’t think she heard him when he was telling her they ended up all printing out at the party, and the lady just didn’t want to take them
I get the defendant saying that the booth DID print out the pictures but if that were really the case, why not give them to her or even bring them to court to prove that they were printed. He lost this case because unlike the plantiff he had no proof of anything! He didn't have the MC with him, he didn't have messages proving it was back up and running, he didn't have the pictures. Is what it is, sorry to him if he is being honest
Dude.... at some point you just have to give up and shave your head.... tf...
At least plaintiff. Got it right.
😂🤣🤣😭😭seriously
Exactly…. Would look better bald!🤷♀️
At first he said it was a self service photo booth, then it changed to there was an attendant... fishy
Plaintiff needs to let his top GOOOO. Bro just embrace the BALD
Dude needs to give up on the comb over.