How Quantum Computers Break Encryption | Shor's Algorithm Explained

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 кві 2019
  • Go to www.dashlane.com/minutephysics to download Dashlane for free, and use offer code minutephysics for 10% off Dashlane Premium!
    Support MinutePhysics on Patreon! / minutephysics
    This video explains Shor’s Algorithm, a way to efficiently factor large pseudoprime integers into their prime factors using a quantum computer. The quantum computation relies on the number-theoretic analysis of the factoring problem via modular arithmetic mod N (where N is the number to be factored), and finding the order or period of a random coprime number mod N. The exponential speedup comes in part from the use of the quantum fast fourier transform which achieves interference among frequencies that are not related to the period (period-finding is the goal of the QFT FFT).
    REFERENCES
    RSA Numbers (sample large numbers to try factoring)
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_num...
    IBM on RSA
    www.ibm.com/support/knowledge...
    Modulo Multiplication Group Tables
    mathworld.wolfram.com/ModuloMu...
    Difference of squares factorization
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differe...
    Euclid’s Algorithm
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclide...
    Rational sieve for factoring
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationa...
    General Number field Sieve
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General...
    Scott Aaronson blog post about Shor’s Algorithm
    www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p...
    Experimental implementation of Shor’s Algorithm (factoring 15, 21, and 35)
    arxiv.org/pdf/1903.00768.pdf
    Adiabatic Quantum Computation factoring the number 291311
    arxiv.org/pdf/1706.08061.pdf
    Scott Aaronson course notes
    www.scottaaronson.com/qclec/
    www.scottaaronson.com/qclec/c...
    Shor’s Algorithm on Quantiki
    www.quantiki.org/wiki/shors-f...
    TLS And SSL use RSA encryption
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transpo...
    Dashlane security whitepaper
    www.dashlane.com/download/Das...
    Link to Patreon Supporters: www.minutephysics.com/supporters/
    MinutePhysics is on twitter - @minutephysics
    And facebook - / minutephysics
    Minute Physics provides an energetic and entertaining view of old and new problems in physics -- all in a minute!
    Created by Henry Reich
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 5 тис.

  • @ghufranullah
    @ghufranullah 5 років тому +16374

    Hey, that's a lot of minutes of physics.

    • @henryjiang9664
      @henryjiang9664 5 років тому +219

      ghufran ullah Exactly 17.5 minutes. Though I’m not complaining.

    • @bloodikiwi9707
      @bloodikiwi9707 5 років тому +155

      wait. that’s illegal

    • @kyleeversfield8276
      @kyleeversfield8276 5 років тому +204

      Actually pretty much half of the video was purely minutes of maths and not physics.

    • @dantebg100
      @dantebg100 5 років тому +18

      Hey, that's pretty good!

    • @ACLozMusik
      @ACLozMusik 5 років тому +161

      It's only a minute of physics if run in a Quantum Computer

  • @idndyzgaming
    @idndyzgaming 5 років тому +2690

    "I'm going to attempt to explain"
    *me: brain explodes*

    • @MrRolnicek
      @MrRolnicek 5 років тому +38

      Yea, every other video he explains something ... quantum encryption he ATTEMPTS to explain

    • @CosmicErrata
      @CosmicErrata 5 років тому +10

      Yours exploded? Mine was removed from existence!

    • @anonymoususer19
      @anonymoususer19 5 років тому +20

      I am a physics and maths guy and still get lost

    • @filipantoncik2604
      @filipantoncik2604 5 років тому +7

      That's nothing to worry about. It took me a long time to understand anything in my lectures on quantum chemistry/advanced math. This stuff takes just buttload of time and a lot of different sources since it gets super abstract and we have nothing to relate it to. Even after a couple of years, I would consider myself not even a newbie in this field.
      Just take some facts that interest you from the vid and general idea and ignore the math for a bit. Like these:
      - Cryptography is based on us lacking raw computational resources to crack the encryption
      - Using some clever math, you can skew this encryption by removing the unwanted "stuff" using cool quantum properties
      - Your browser history is safe for the foreseeable future, since getting quantum computers to actually work, with reasonable qbits (computational power) is hella hard

    • @anonymoususer19
      @anonymoususer19 5 років тому

      Filip Antončík ok but how does the quantum computer cancel the wrong stuff out that’s physically impossible to do with artificial intelligence

  • @bluesy22
    @bluesy22 3 роки тому +672

    Him: "...and here's the clever part."
    Me: "WHAT WAS THE REST OF THIS?!"

    • @danielyuan9862
      @danielyuan9862 2 роки тому +30

      getting to the clever part

    • @user-kp5zh8mc9e
      @user-kp5zh8mc9e 2 роки тому +16

      Its can even get complicated, when your first language isnt English, but Russian...

    • @csquaredfilms
      @csquaredfilms 2 роки тому +1

      @@user-kp5zh8mc9e well you’re doing better than all the russian people who cant speak english at all so

    • @misitan42z
      @misitan42z Рік тому

      @@user-kp5zh8mc9e I can confirm you're Russian
      Source: your name and first 5 words

    • @ewthmatth
      @ewthmatth Рік тому +1

      ​​@@danielyuan9862 you misunderstand. The above commenter is saying that it ALL seems clever (i.e. Complex and complicated) to them.

  • @brenorocha6687
    @brenorocha6687 3 роки тому +328

    It's amazing to see that someone can grasp such difficult concepts well enough to make this "simple" explanation. I don't have the knowledge to understand, but I still can have an idea of what it's about. And it's even more reassuring to see comments from physics students who find this video useful in addition to their study material. Thank you very much and keep the good work!

  • @davidmelendezsoto7528
    @davidmelendezsoto7528 4 роки тому +3224

    I watch this when I’m feeling too smart
    To remind myself that I’m not really smart

    • @mywither7878
      @mywither7878 4 роки тому +56

      In watching this, I expected exactly that, but I felt extra smart instead, I think I may be delusional in my understanding of this stuff, what's your opinion?

    • @johnclever8813
      @johnclever8813 4 роки тому +21

      Mywither
      I don’t know, but I’m currently in my freshman year of high school writing a paper about Fourier Transforms, so I also felt extra smart. It’s crazy how often they show up.

    • @johnclever8813
      @johnclever8813 4 роки тому +2

      Patriot Spring
      Really?

    • @mryup6100
      @mryup6100 4 роки тому +1

      @Patriot Spring wowww

    • @someone-vk6gk
      @someone-vk6gk 4 роки тому +6

      I'm just abuse myself I don't feel smart yet here I am

  • @12gabriel3
    @12gabriel3 5 років тому +2337

    My brain waves superpositioned in a way that only the neurons which did not undertand got positive interference

    • @stratos5372
      @stratos5372 5 років тому +177

      You sir, you got the point of the video.

    • @Nilguiri
      @Nilguiri 5 років тому

      ¡Olé!

    • @nonscience3842
      @nonscience3842 5 років тому +149

      Since you were able to isolate the non-understanding neurons, subtract them from your results to get total understanding of the video.
      You're welcome.

    • @jdsmooth2j
      @jdsmooth2j 5 років тому +4

      Hahaha 🤣

    • @Mcspazz731
      @Mcspazz731 5 років тому +1

      5Head

  • @jellovendigar
    @jellovendigar 3 роки тому +78

    I love how he makes very hard concepts approachable. Now I’ll share this video with anyone who thinks quantum computers are basically magic

    • @jansenart0
      @jansenart0 2 роки тому +11

      Fails to explain where the math and the physical reality coincide. And the explanation of Shor's Algorithm in this video does not require QM at all.
      "being cleverly arranged" "set up a quantum mechanical computer"
      A block diagram represented by blue fuzz and black dots.
      That still requires all guesses to be fed into it to generate "destructive interference among guesses".... somehow.
      i. e. magic.

    • @user-un8hy5dd3j
      @user-un8hy5dd3j Рік тому +2

      still magic for me

    • @rightwingsafetysquad9872
      @rightwingsafetysquad9872 3 місяці тому

      But the crux of the video is "because quantum computers are magic this works faster".

  • @comoli8609
    @comoli8609 3 роки тому +15

    I did a project on shors algorithms problems and benefits, instead of trying to explain what it did, I just summed it up with "using math" 😂.

  • @cannaroe1213
    @cannaroe1213 4 роки тому +3821

    Me at the half mark: "This couldn't get anymore complicated."
    minutephysics: *_"Fourier Transforms!"_*

    • @bicpentameter4895
      @bicpentameter4895 4 роки тому +56

      Imma just code a basic version of this real quick

    • @sumitkumar12
      @sumitkumar12 4 роки тому +54

      Quantum Fourier Transformation

    • @Benedocta
      @Benedocta 4 роки тому +89

      The fourier transform is definetely the simple part of this.

    • @OskaIvanovichSmirnov
      @OskaIvanovichSmirnov 4 роки тому +9

      Me after concepts of concepts back to back: 🤯

    • @kartikayrai5774
      @kartikayrai5774 3 роки тому +1

      lmao same

  • @WAMTAT
    @WAMTAT 5 років тому +1562

    I think I follow. Smart computer makes maths go fast. Fast math is equal to no more computer security.

    • @samuelmatheson9655
      @samuelmatheson9655 5 років тому +131

      QUICK MATS

    • @kevinzhu6417
      @kevinzhu6417 5 років тому +104

      alex do good. smart boy know latest developments in computer security

    • @dellarosa1716
      @dellarosa1716 5 років тому +11

      alexander williams underrated comment is underrated

    • @redhunter8731
      @redhunter8731 5 років тому +15

      Not exactly. Computer security is still possible it would have to evolve.

    • @moondust2365
      @moondust2365 5 років тому +29

      It actually goes both ways. Quantum computers calculate faster math. That faster math can be used to _en_ -crypt or _de_ - crypt. So, no worries...

  • @splodeyferret
    @splodeyferret 2 роки тому +38

    Incredible and impressive that a whole video on breaking industry standard encryption with quantum computers doesn't mention prime numbers... it's like you figured that it was an extra complication that didn't need to be there for the purposes of this video, and you're right!

    • @theworm7156
      @theworm7156 2 місяці тому +2

      I mean whenever he talks about the big numbers used in encryption he’s talking about prime numbers

  • @bowenjudd1028
    @bowenjudd1028 3 роки тому +21

    Me looking at quantum computers: It’s so cute.
    Brutus: We must think of this quantum computer as a serpents egg, not dangerous now but will be later if not dealt with.

    • @ltnthony8791
      @ltnthony8791 2 роки тому

      Shakespeare and quantum computing... Such an elegant blend

    • @Shaun_Jones
      @Shaun_Jones 3 місяці тому

      Well, you can also make quantum encryption that is resistant to this sort of thing; but I’ve only done one course of C# coding and have no idea how that works, so don’t ask me.

  • @henrygao4487
    @henrygao4487 4 роки тому +4672

    As a physics student I clicked into this thinking it's just another super basic introductory video...
    Ends up thoroughly reviewing 2 weeks of solid materials from my quantum computing class
    Edit: Highly recommend a quantum computing class if you can take one! More of a math class than physics but still super interesting

    • @anjalimittal5706
      @anjalimittal5706 4 роки тому +27

      how is quantum computing classes ? I'm thinking to take them in my college next year

    • @tubester358
      @tubester358 4 роки тому +65

      @@anjalimittal5706 I myself have only attended an introductory class of a course that I ended up not taking, far as I recall half the syllabus was theoretical introductory subtopics before they get to the gates and how quantum computers are/work

    • @lukefernandez3492
      @lukefernandez3492 4 роки тому +14

      AJ Ok

    • @sampattuzzi
      @sampattuzzi 4 роки тому +43

      I wish my lecturer in Quantum Computing taught it this well. I finally get it. Only 6 years late!

    • @gabe8168
      @gabe8168 4 роки тому +29

      @@AJ-ds5gf why are you mad? Are you jealous that he didn't drop out of school?

  • @Asocialite__
    @Asocialite__ 4 роки тому +1365

    0:59 With you so far
    1:02 Shor's Algorithm... never heard of it but I can dig it
    3:57 Ok... just explain what Shor's Algorithm is...
    7:31 Uhh....
    8:56 Ok wait, stop
    11:52 Ok man, you just keep talking, I'm gonna go write a comment

    • @vms_kt
      @vms_kt 4 роки тому +23

      Has this been marked a top comment yet? It needs to be.

    • @Firebreak_2
      @Firebreak_2 4 роки тому +9

      i slept mid video

    • @taylorg6632
      @taylorg6632 4 роки тому +7

      The official history of this video xD

    • @davidcook4823
      @davidcook4823 4 роки тому +6

      I feel attacked.

    • @astralfall3628
      @astralfall3628 4 роки тому +6

      Followed this to a T. Around 11 mins in i decided to read the comments

  • @jcolinmizia9161
    @jcolinmizia9161 3 роки тому +20

    The scary part of this is that breaking encryption is no longer a mathematical or scientific question, it’s an engineering question.

    • @bloonspy2260
      @bloonspy2260 Рік тому +4

      but all engineering questions are really fundamentally math and science questions

    • @TheMrVogue
      @TheMrVogue 9 місяців тому +2

      @@bloonspy2260 but all math and science questions are ultimately questions

    • @codinghub3759
      @codinghub3759 9 місяців тому +3

      ​@@TheMrVoguebut all questions are fundamentally sentences

    • @PurpleBaldGuy
      @PurpleBaldGuy 8 місяців тому +2

      ​@@codinghub3759but all sentences are fundamentally words

    • @m_affiliates
      @m_affiliates 4 місяці тому +2

      ⁠@@PurpleBaldGuy but all words are fundamentally letters

  • @tauhidzaman2826
    @tauhidzaman2826 3 роки тому +5

    Thanks for making this video. I took a class with Peter Shor and I still didnt understand his algorithm. But this video makes it so clear. Great work!

  • @akatsukilevi
    @akatsukilevi 4 роки тому +2003

    Me: I'm safe! My computer is using RSA-256 to store passwords
    Quantum computer: Hold my P

  • @Cailus3542
    @Cailus3542 4 роки тому +551

    13:59 "...and I'm oversimplifying a touch here."
    ...Uh huh. 0_0

    • @taylorg6632
      @taylorg6632 4 роки тому +14

      But I gots an A+ on coloring homewaork!! ^(ovO)^

    • @DrexYiii
      @DrexYiii 4 роки тому +6

      I saw this comment while watching at the point of 13:59. Lol

    • @xsuperpigx
      @xsuperpigx 4 роки тому +1

      Taylor G I nearly got detention for not colouring in my homework once... it wasn’t fun.

    • @vsiegel
      @vsiegel 3 роки тому

      Who would ever simplify quantum mechanics? We know many explanations, but all of them are already simplifications!

  • @kenedi987
    @kenedi987 2 роки тому +2

    Great vid, thanks minutephysics! Been following your channel since I was 9 or 10 and now I'm going into uni and your content is still great and useful.

  • @macpr0c
    @macpr0c 3 роки тому +10

    My god this video helped me immensely for intuitively understanding the logic behind the Shor's algorithm for my QC course ! Honestly I did not expect such a relatively indepth look at the workings of the algorithm but I was very pleasantly surprised. Thank you.

  • @Fuzzycuffsqt
    @Fuzzycuffsqt 5 років тому +150

    Ooooh. Now I understand.
    That box full of little dots is where the maths come from.

    • @agiar2000
      @agiar2000 5 років тому +21

      **Slaps lid of box.**
      "This bad boy can fit so many maths in it."

  • @cogenerate
    @cogenerate 5 років тому +1010

    Here's how quantum computers will break even the strongest encryption ridiculously easy. Now, buy our sponsor's product... encryption.

    • @eclipserepeater2466
      @eclipserepeater2466 5 років тому +70

      And that's why the video ends with "but encryption still works for now!"

    • @shaqmaverick
      @shaqmaverick 5 років тому +4

      @@eclipserepeater2466 it could bypass cryptocurrency? genius

    • @xylophonezebra2104
      @xylophonezebra2104 5 років тому +13

      Would have been epic if this ended with a plug for Bitcoin.

    • @xylophonezebra2104
      @xylophonezebra2104 5 років тому +4

      Kampfarsch, tell that to Intel 🙂

    • @tudornaconecinii3609
      @tudornaconecinii3609 5 років тому +34

      Kampfarsch quantum computers exist right now. It's just that they are billions of times weaker than binary computers atm because we don't know how to stably stack qubits together yet.

  • @JacklynnInChina
    @JacklynnInChina Рік тому

    Every now and again I forget how shor's algorithm works, and every now and again this video comes up in my recommended and reminds me. Solid review of the quantum computing section of my survey of computer science. Love your videos

  • @JamesonHuddle
    @JamesonHuddle Рік тому +5

    I'm gonna be honest I only understood a tiny bit of the math but the overall concept is really cool and I am really excited about the future of computing both quantum and "regular." Thanks for the video

  • @friedpickles7924
    @friedpickles7924 5 років тому +2498

    Does that mean that naming my porn folder as *Homework* wont work anymore?

    • @amateurprogrammer25
      @amateurprogrammer25 5 років тому +279

      No that will continue to not work just like it always has

    • @macronencer
      @macronencer 5 років тому +164

      Hey it kind of IS homework. In a way.

    • @amateurprogrammer25
      @amateurprogrammer25 5 років тому +66

      @@macronencer um....
      say more about that

    • @Ghorda9
      @Ghorda9 5 років тому +105

      @@amateurprogrammer25 Studying anatomy for art/film/painting/etc.

    • @MatthewChenIsAwesome
      @MatthewChenIsAwesome 5 років тому +12

      @@TheJoystick14 yes, but if there were no net displacement, then no work would be done! You must always remember to stop exerting force in a location that was different than the start!

  • @redditatnight3222
    @redditatnight3222 5 років тому +187

    Movie script: **Has some tech they can't explain**
    Scriptwriters: *"Quantum"*

    • @ravenous9577
      @ravenous9577 5 років тому +5

      Reddit at Night yeah pisses me off tbh

    • @MinecraftCoolCreeper
      @MinecraftCoolCreeper 5 років тому +5

      Endgame spoiler alert:
      Yeah marvel endgame using "quantum mechanics" to try to describe time travel while making zero sense

    • @AnthanKrufix
      @AnthanKrufix 5 років тому +5

      "Do you guys just add 'quantum' to everything?" ~Antman and the Wasp

    • @_BangDroid_
      @_BangDroid_ 5 років тому

      Firefox *_Quantum_*

    • @meltice_official
      @meltice_official 5 років тому +1

      I know enough to make conversations... Rip black widow

  • @runtrls
    @runtrls 2 роки тому

    Spectacular explanation! Thank you Minute Physics - I've always wanted to understand this.

  • @karicowo
    @karicowo 3 роки тому

    After a few hours of watching videos about quantum computing, I think I got a pretty solid grasp on how quantum computing is useful and how it's applied, thanks

  • @pensive955
    @pensive955 5 років тому +1789

    me: *understands nothing*
    also me: *nodding along* yes, yep that's what I thought

    • @reyariass
      @reyariass 5 років тому +56

      "Ahuh... carry the one- yes, i was about to tell you to do that."

    • @lordmaximillius3431
      @lordmaximillius3431 5 років тому +7

      😂🤣🤣 on jah...I'm fucking dead

    • @jamestheotherone742
      @jamestheotherone742 5 років тому +14

      Not to worry, even the people that created it were the same way, they just realized that everyone else would have the same reaction and no one would admit it made no sense, not even the people who write checks and give out grant money.

    • @DrMrPersonGuy
      @DrMrPersonGuy 5 років тому +2

      @@jamestheotherone742 What about it makes no sense?

    • @Kalenz1234
      @Kalenz1234 5 років тому +15

      It was easy to follow the logic.
      I just have no idea about how the math works.
      How does a shared factor of the factors give you the factor?

  • @Ngamotu83
    @Ngamotu83 5 років тому +1534

    I'm just going to pretend I understood even a minute of all this.

    • @Guztav1337
      @Guztav1337 5 років тому +116

      You don't have to understand per se, just get the general idea:
      1. There is math for turning crappy guess into better guess. (slow on a normal computer)
      2. Quantum computing, can make multiple guesses at the same time. (fast)
      3. Destructive interference with all the wrong guesses leaves you with the right guess. (get right guess fast)
      4. This method can break internet privacy and security, exposing everybody's data. Because it can guess correct fast.
      It's like using all the keys in the world at once to unlock your door, and one of them will be correct, and you can instantly find the correct.

    • @TinfoilHatWearer
      @TinfoilHatWearer 5 років тому

      Me too.... 😞

    • @RamkrishanYT
      @RamkrishanYT 5 років тому +7

      I actually understood the first minute where he says that he's going to 'attempt' to explain it. In that segment, the author is saying that he will try to explain Shor's algorithm in the next segment.

    • @VidVwr00
      @VidVwr00 5 років тому

      This just taught me everything I forgot

    • @SuperShekky
      @SuperShekky 5 років тому

      You have a poor brain

  • @commanderzander580
    @commanderzander580 3 роки тому +7

    This can be used against asymmetric encryption, but not symmetric encryption, which is what most data uses. Symmetric encryption takes a random string of letters and numbers, and uses that string to mash up the data in specific ways that you can't undo without knowing what the string is. No factoring is involved, and you can't use Shor's algorithm. However, getting your secret string to someone you trust usually DOES include asymmetric encryption. But if the quantum attacker missed the key exchange, you can't break in by doing this.

    • @gotnoname3956
      @gotnoname3956 Місяць тому

      It can't be even used against asymmetric encryption in general. Only for the encryption that are using factorization. For lattice based algorithm there is no usage at all for it. And there are several asymmetric encryptions that are not based on factorization.

  • @ishir1495
    @ishir1495 3 роки тому +12

    ME 4 MINUTES IN: I AM UNDERSTANDING EVERYTHING
    ME AFTER 2 MIN: HUH,WHATS GOING ON?WHERE AM I?WHAT AM I DOING?

    • @dragonchan
      @dragonchan 2 роки тому

      Same ☠️☠️☠️

  • @SofosProject
    @SofosProject 5 років тому +825

    *sees 17 minute time*
    Boy I'm in for a ride.

    • @sasdagreat8052
      @sasdagreat8052 5 років тому +14

      -minutephysics-
      minutesphysics

    • @russdill
      @russdill 5 років тому +4

      And the music ran out after the first minute.

    • @ChIbIDahKIlla
      @ChIbIDahKIlla 5 років тому +1

      *holds his own beer*

    • @munster355
      @munster355 5 років тому

      Especially when it's about quantum physics...

    • @pkeric2626
      @pkeric2626 5 років тому +1

      russdill lmao did‘nt even notice

  • @TheIronflame
    @TheIronflame 5 років тому +358

    This was one of the best explanations I've seen of /exactly/ how quantum computers can be faster at certain problems.

    • @Dezomm
      @Dezomm 5 років тому +4

      Agreed, I've known the gist of it but now I feel like I actually get it. Obviously there's much more to it but now I feel like I could at least explain it to someone else, which I wasn't able to before watching this.
      Thank you minutephysics

    • @poopsmcgee2k6
      @poopsmcgee2k6 5 років тому +13

      This guy pretending to get it

    • @perhapsso1909
      @perhapsso1909 5 років тому +6

      @@poopsmcgee2k6 it makes sense in the video. Although simplified, it should give you a basic idea.

    • @justinl2009
      @justinl2009 5 років тому

      @@perhapsso1909 Wait, this is basic? Jesus, I can't even imagine the advanced form.

    • @callofdutymuhammad
      @callofdutymuhammad 5 років тому

      @@justinl2009 Did a course on it a few years ago by accident (thought it was a good idea) 2 weeks in, I realise this shits basically all voodoo when you go into depth. But after that i've finished higher physics/maths/cs so maybe if i try going in depth again ill gain a better understanding.

  • @n-da-bunka2650
    @n-da-bunka2650 5 місяців тому

    4:39 - Position of enlightenment. Truly needed NOTHING else in this video other than this one 10 second snippet! Thanks!

  • @Gredddfe
    @Gredddfe 3 роки тому +40

    "Design an algorithm which calculates all possible answers at once while being clever enough that the wrong answers destructively interfere with each other".
    As a humble PHP programmer, the first thing I did was laugh. Then I panicked. Now I want to program on quantum computers.

  • @DanDan-yy5bo
    @DanDan-yy5bo 5 років тому +248

    I‘m gonna be honest, at a certain point I didn’t understand it anymore, but just the fact that I understood half of it is good enough and it just shows how good you explain things. Great channel, keep it up!

    • @30weekoldwomber61
      @30weekoldwomber61 5 років тому +3

      It's an overview.plus you dont know anything about the computer itself, so its not really possible to understand everything just from this video, only if you have studied many different pieces separately already.

    • @davidvondoom2853
      @davidvondoom2853 5 років тому +2

      Ya, I feel like you need to understand what a quantum computer is and how it works, to understand the second half of the video.

    • @DanDan-yy5bo
      @DanDan-yy5bo 5 років тому

      David von Doom I actually get that a quantum computer works by randomly searching off data, while a normal computer does it in an order, and that this is due to super position, but it‘s hard to understand not knowing much about electronics and computers in particular.

    • @30weekoldwomber61
      @30weekoldwomber61 5 років тому

      @@DanDan-yy5bo No I dont think it does anything randomly. I dont know how it works too be upfront, but if it was random the computation would be random in its results. For want of a better metaphor, imagine a hypercube, hard to picture in your mind, but easier to compute. Quantum computers can make use of extra "dimensions" exponentially based on the number of qubits it has available...that's a metaphor still...
      My point is only that its not random, just complex and very different to how classical computing works. I wish I knew more and I dont understand it myself.

    • @PatchyE
      @PatchyE 5 років тому

      @@DanDan-yy5bo Oh you don't need to know any electronics to understand quantum computer. You only need to know some basic quantum physics.

  • @ncedwards1234
    @ncedwards1234 4 роки тому +612

    Me: Follows the explanation to the end
    Also me at 14:53: Oh, g stands for guess

    • @-ireeri-3956
      @-ireeri-3956 3 роки тому +1

      Woooo

    • @ElGrecoOB
      @ElGrecoOB 3 роки тому +9

      I remember g being used as shorthand for "generator" in my number theory course. But I must admit that I was not able to completely follow the details...

    • @TheTck90
      @TheTck90 3 роки тому

      I watched this after my relativity course and kept thinking g is a metric tensor

    • @chrisdejager
      @chrisdejager 3 роки тому +7

      And I kept seeing 9 instead of g :)

    • @lazyer0511
      @lazyer0511 3 роки тому +11

      And p stands for power

  • @nicoleisgoddess
    @nicoleisgoddess 3 роки тому +1

    This is by far the best description of quantum computing for nonprofessionals I have found on youtube

  • @matthewblanchard7823
    @matthewblanchard7823 Рік тому

    Very well done explanation with excellent pacing. I'm very limited in my knowledge of math but I kind of got the idea behind it all.

  • @sydswift4989
    @sydswift4989 5 років тому +1351

    Just send the data in plaintext. When the hackers assume you've done the right thing and transmitted encrypted data, they will try to decrypt it and just end up garbling it.

    • @ridermcdonald
      @ridermcdonald 5 років тому +211

      Syd Swift Reverse Psychology at its finest🤣

    • @thehiddenninja3428
      @thehiddenninja3428 5 років тому +120

      Very true! No hackers would actually look at the data transmitted

    • @vanillacokejunky
      @vanillacokejunky 4 роки тому +169

      i know its a joke but clearly you guys have never seen a packet sniffer like wireshark in action. its immediately noticeable when something is sent in plain unencrypted text. i mean i guess you could speak in code and send that over plain text like "Mother Goose has landed" but that defeats the purpose of using the technology in the first place.

    • @sydswift4989
      @sydswift4989 4 роки тому +156

      @@vanillacokejunky I have used wireshark before, and you're right, if you know which packet you're looking for then it would be easy to see that its unencrypted, but if you were to write a script to automate the process of decrypting large amounts of data then you might miss that and just skip right to processing it through your algorithm. One way to "fool" someone using this "method" would be to send a bunch of encrypted arbitrary data before the unencrypted data to make them assume that it is all encrypted. I'm not proposing anyone should transmit unencrypted data for the record, but it's a fun thought experiment.

    • @muhammadammarrasyid5780
      @muhammadammarrasyid5780 4 роки тому +22

      This some mind game sh*t

  • @theCodyReeder
    @theCodyReeder 5 років тому +2291

    Why do I get the feeling we're about to break the game?

    • @mineteam0
      @mineteam0 5 років тому +204

      We are in the endgame of computer science now.

    • @hajmola7605
      @hajmola7605 5 років тому +12

      Oh look who's here!

    • @godfreypoon5148
      @godfreypoon5148 5 років тому +6

      It's because that guy in the sketches with the laptop keeps vomiting. Sooner or later he's gonna get some in the laptop and then it's all over.

    • @SamuelLay
      @SamuelLay 5 років тому +18

      And now you've made me lose the game!

    • @BothHands1
      @BothHands1 5 років тому

      Hopefully we have some time before that happens. lol

  • @agustincarvallorauff6899
    @agustincarvallorauff6899 Рік тому

    What a great video man. Incredible easy explained. Thank you

  • @Cenox1000
    @Cenox1000 3 роки тому +1

    I'm a student currently working on a lecture about this algorithm. Video helped a lot. Thanks :)

  • @StarboyXL9
    @StarboyXL9 5 років тому +1368

    My girlfriend really enjoys quantum physics. She said that her physics professor really taught her some "super positions"

    • @viceversadetroit
      @viceversadetroit 4 роки тому +210

      but he lacked the necessary mechanics?

    • @Baigle1
      @Baigle1 4 роки тому +112

      how to get an A+

    • @survivor6940
      @survivor6940 4 роки тому +70

      That is actually a funny dad joke...

    • @isaacdavis1363
      @isaacdavis1363 4 роки тому +154

      he has a quantum dick that can be hard and soft at the same time

    • @JITCompilation
      @JITCompilation 4 роки тому +35

      Okay.
      *unzips*

  • @sunglow9835
    @sunglow9835 5 років тому +278

    9:46
    Lets just take a moment admire the marker changes in this part. Like goddamn, that looks satisfying!

    • @marcoottina654
      @marcoottina654 4 роки тому +4

      ​@plastic bottle or his eyes are in a super position.
      Or super observation.
      ahah

    • @AnonMedic
      @AnonMedic 4 роки тому +2

      Looks even better if you slow it down a bit

    • @simopelle
      @simopelle 4 роки тому

      put video speed to 0.5x

    • @SubduedRadical
      @SubduedRadical 4 роки тому +1

      :O
      It's a superposition of markers! Sorta!
      Good catch. I was so mesmerized by the information, I didn't even see the colors. It's all math to me.

  • @itamarteuerstein8531
    @itamarteuerstein8531 2 роки тому

    Keep making longer videos, they are great!

  • @MrMaefiu
    @MrMaefiu Рік тому

    amazing video! Thanks a lot for the work you put into this!

  • @TheDekalibrierer
    @TheDekalibrierer 4 роки тому +991

    As a student who had to learn Shor's Algorithm for an exam: Thank you for this video!
    I finally have an intuitive understanding of that the algorithm is trying to achieve, and how. Of course, I had to invest an extra couple of hours to be able to actually calculate this stuff correctly, but even when you reach that point, I found that you still lack that "feeling" for what is actually happening in front of you while you're doing all of this.
    This video helped with that part, it's the easiest way to explain what is actually going on, you get this really good and informative overview, without being interrupted after every step because you have to do some laborous matrix transformation again. :)

    • @skittybug6937
      @skittybug6937 4 роки тому +39

      I don't even understand this comment.

    • @adilshonbayev9567
      @adilshonbayev9567 3 роки тому +10

      Man how did you do this? I think to understand all that stuff you have to start thinking like a quantum computer.

    • @enderb0t
      @enderb0t 3 роки тому +1

      Okay you English major

    • @iveharzing
      @iveharzing 3 роки тому +24

      @@adilshonbayev9567 It mostly comes down to preliminary knowledge: you have to study the parts before you're able to understand the whole.
      It's hard to understand integration if you've never heard of a function before.
      It's hard to understand Shor's algorithm if you've never heard of a Fourier Transform before.
      It's hard to understand Fourier Transforms if you've never heard of Complex numbers.
      Etc etc.......

    • @Twisted_Code
      @Twisted_Code 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah I know how you feel. Sometimes I watch Tom Scott's tech videos for topics I already think I understand, but the explanation often lets me solidify my understanding.

  • @sagetmaster4
    @sagetmaster4 5 років тому +604

    Really appreciate how much effort you put into this, thanks

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 5 років тому +3

      Yeah well, the title of this video is a bit misleading.
      Let me explain... just because we might get super fast quantum computers in the future, Internet Security will NOT be destroyed instantly. Why? Simply because of a little thing called "Timeout Delay (TD)" and "Two Factor Authentication (2FA)" during the Challenge/Response phase.
      Timeout is an artificially introduced delay in the log-in process (including in real time browsing encryption), specifically if you enter the first password incorrectly (or the browser send the incorrect NONCE response), there could be a 5 second timeout, and with each subsequent wrong entry the timeout delay may be increases with a predetermined amount or exponentially (similar to the iPhone's screen lock method), therefore rendering any super-fast quantum computer useless. In other words you may be able to generate all the password combinations possible in a short time, but you won't be able to enter it in a short enough time, that is before you die. ;)
      Two Factor Authentication takes it a step further, incorporating the Timeout Delay, and it also sends a temporary password/prompt to a second device completely separate from log-in device, and without the proper authentication even the correct password will not work.
      Both of these methods can be easily implemented into any website's log-in process (including browser encryption), practically nullifying the advantages of the fastest quantum computers on Earth, so Internet Security will NOT be destroyed just yet. ;D

    • @calebjiang4056
      @calebjiang4056 4 роки тому

      @@BillAnt there's no need to brute force the password when you can brute force the secure element where the password is stored.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 4 роки тому

      @Caleb Jiang < Well sure, IF you have access to that secure enclave (for example in the iPhone it's impenetrable thus far).
      Karim Alibhai < I certainly understand that, I was just making an illustration with a regular password login which is quite similar in mechanism (challenge response wise) so most people would understand. Plus there are way too many "IF"s in capturing real time traffic. And let's suppose that quantum computing will becomes available, rest assured clever browser designers will implement countermeasures against real time traffic snooping such as encrypted dummy packets which will simply trip up even quantum computers by bogging them down with useless computations.
      One of the best countermeasures against brute force hacking is a "timeout", meaning that there's a programmed time lapse between restries which renders even quantum computers useless, there's nothing to try till the timeout is over.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 4 роки тому

      Karim Alibhai < Right, but you still can't inject an NONCE challenge no matter what tool you have till quantum computing becomes available. And by then browser makers would have already implemented methods to trip up even quantum computers by various techniques including timeouts during the challenge/response phase. I rest assure you, you can sleep just fine tonight that none's gonna steal your real time traffic as long as it's encrypted by industry standard methods.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 4 роки тому

      @Karim Alibhai < Well obviously government sponsored spying taps the "data pipe" at the source and even use Zero Day OS exploits and other backdoors to read your data BEFORE it even gets encrypted by the browser. So yeah my advice is don't do anything illegal and you'll be fine. ;) (not talking to you specifically but in general) Oh and as far as cloud based storage, anyone who stores their contacts, messages, etc in a Google account for example is probably the least safe place since upon a subpoena they'll decrypt it in a heart beat.

  • @sefulthaw5640
    @sefulthaw5640 2 роки тому +500

    Nobody becomes a millionaire or a billionaire by working for others and depending on them, good investment bring millions of dollars, and consistency brings billions, the market is all about BTC at the moment now....

    • @maryjones8160
      @maryjones8160 2 роки тому

      speaking of investing, forex trading is the best business in the world right now I know a couple of friends who make a lot of money weekly trading the financial markets

    • @freerchristen7357
      @freerchristen7357 2 роки тому

      But successful people don't become that way overnight. What most people see at a glance wealth, a great career, purpose is the result of hard work and hustle over time.

    • @scotjames6812
      @scotjames6812 2 роки тому

      @@freerchristen7357 Talking about being successful!..

    • @maxwellwilliams3644
      @maxwellwilliams3644 2 роки тому

      @Franklin powel But of a truth there are scammers but real brokers are there too waiting for investors!

    • @janemicheal4163
      @janemicheal4163 2 роки тому

      @@maxwellwilliams3644 You're right Sir

  • @gauthamchandra2081
    @gauthamchandra2081 3 роки тому

    Absolutely brilliant, very intuitively explained.

  • @kittybeans8192
    @kittybeans8192 5 років тому +332

    I remember when this channel was MINUTE physics...
    no regrets.

    • @christopherrowley7506
      @christopherrowley7506 5 років тому +17

      if you pronounce minute with emphasis on the second syllable, minute as in really small, then the quantum stuff is still on topic..........

    • @wwtapsable
      @wwtapsable 5 років тому +1

      youtubes algorithm kills that junk

    • @Blox117
      @Blox117 5 років тому +1

      its still called minutephysics

    • @PlasmaMongoose
      @PlasmaMongoose 5 років тому

      If they could post this video on a quantum computer, it would only take a minute to watch again.

    • @jongyon7192p
      @jongyon7192p 5 років тому

      17.5 minutephysics

  • @someone-mh1bo
    @someone-mh1bo 5 років тому +880

    You should make a new channel called MinuteCS.

    • @PoweDiePie
      @PoweDiePie 5 років тому +64

      17minuteCS.

    • @NetAndyCz
      @NetAndyCz 5 років тому +32

      Seriously, it will take two years and we will see hour long videos here.

    • @artispeedy
      @artispeedy 5 років тому +7

      This is more like MinuteAlgebra.

    • @nurdboy5060
      @nurdboy5060 5 років тому +10

      Minute computer science?
      Thats great
      He can make a playlist rather than a new channel

    • @jamestheotherone742
      @jamestheotherone742 5 років тому +2

      Nothing really CS here except for the "Magic Box" quantum computer he holds up as the solution to all of the flaws in this idea.

  • @jukmifggugghposer
    @jukmifggugghposer Рік тому

    OMG I’ve been looking for this kinda video for ~so~ long. I’ve heard quite a few times that “quantum computers break modern encryption methods”, but it’s never been explained any more than “bits can take values between 0 and 1, therefore they’re better at cracking encryption”. So glad to find this.
    Okay this was a much more satisfying explanation. I’m not gonna say I understood it 100% on first watch, but I am now armed with at least a surface level understanding of why quantum computers break modern encryption.

  • @gerosantillan84
    @gerosantillan84 3 роки тому

    I love this videos. I don't get a single thing I'm watching but I still feel amazed

  • @tehnomsthewalrus
    @tehnomsthewalrus 5 років тому +331

    Take a drink every time he says "superposition"

    • @lachezartsvetkov5716
      @lachezartsvetkov5716 5 років тому +8

      I am drunk af

    • @JackLe1127
      @JackLe1127 5 років тому +1

      I think my brain is in a superposition state

    • @Kalenz1234
      @Kalenz1234 5 років тому

      A shot* A drink every time leaves you for dead.

    • @jamestheotherone742
      @jamestheotherone742 5 років тому

      Take a shot every time he says "if" and "but"

    • @pokemoncatch6727
      @pokemoncatch6727 5 років тому

      You must of pee’ed your self watching this video

  • @marcushendriksen8415
    @marcushendriksen8415 5 років тому +74

    "Are you _sure_ this encryption is unbreakable?"
    "Shor I'm sure!"

  • @KenWadland
    @KenWadland Рік тому

    I've been curious about how Shor's Algorithm works. This video explained it perfectly!

  • @steed3902
    @steed3902 3 роки тому

    this was incredible. made me feel like i understand something i have very little understanding of! Kudos to the presenter.

  • @jocabulous
    @jocabulous 4 роки тому +510

    damn they really left that computer computing for 2000 years

    • @nicholascomet8528
      @nicholascomet8528 4 роки тому +4

      jacob henke gotta be a simulation though, because computers have only been around for like 2 centuries at maximum.

    • @jocabulous
      @jocabulous 4 роки тому +158

      t h a t s t h e j o k e

    • @tejastakalkar7924
      @tejastakalkar7924 4 роки тому +20

      I don't think so... Because the computer would stop computing if there is a power shortage even for single day in those 2000 years....and it will have to start again from the scratch 😪

    • @gweltazlemartret6760
      @gweltazlemartret6760 4 роки тому +79

      @@tejastakalkar7924 : 2000 years for 1 computer.
      1 year for 2000 computers.
      1 day for 730 000 computers.
      Big numbers.

    • @collinhoben3793
      @collinhoben3793 4 роки тому +12

      @@nicholascomet8528 r/whoosh

  • @freddyfredrickson
    @freddyfredrickson 5 років тому +322

    I think a commodore 64 will crack a 1000 digit encryption code before I will understand this video.

    • @BrendonGreenNZL
      @BrendonGreenNZL 4 роки тому +3

      I'm sure it could do it, given a large enough spool of tape to swap to.

    • @catchara1496
      @catchara1496 4 роки тому +1

      Brendon Green *but would it be faster*

  • @michaelareay1037
    @michaelareay1037 2 роки тому

    Very helpful. This is something I have to start to get to grips with and a first run of this lesson gave me good insight and with a few more views I think I will absorb it more fully. I'll be back.

  • @tahajaffer1833
    @tahajaffer1833 Місяць тому

    This was wonderful, thank you minutephysics!

  • @CalculusPhysics
    @CalculusPhysics 5 років тому +377

    i would definitely love to hear more about the Quantum Fourier Transform!

    • @MackyMuse
      @MackyMuse 5 років тому +2

      Chloe loser

    • @stardustreverie6880
      @stardustreverie6880 5 років тому +44

      Chloe winner

    • @vivek7154
      @vivek7154 5 років тому

      Is this a thing?

    • @recklessroges
      @recklessroges 5 років тому +4

      Before QFT I would start with ua-cam.com/video/spUNpyF58BYv/v-deo.html (though if you're watching MP, you probably already have.)

    • @Inujasa88
      @Inujasa88 5 років тому

      Does this really exist? Is this really a thing?

  • @frank16999
    @frank16999 5 років тому +384

    Me after hearing the words Fourier Transform for the first time after completing an engineering degree: *Hello darkness my old friend*

    • @Luis0n7i
      @Luis0n7i 5 років тому +7

      Hahahaha same here :'v

    • @chuachenghong7788
      @chuachenghong7788 5 років тому +3

      Lucky you. I have to deal with fourier transform since year 1.

    • @mojolotz
      @mojolotz 5 років тому

      *shudders*

    • @ifer1280
      @ifer1280 5 років тому

      I just spent five minutes looking for the word convolution. I remembered the math, but not the name!

    • @harunkivril7186
      @harunkivril7186 5 років тому

      Industrial Engineer ?

  • @cern1999sb
    @cern1999sb Рік тому

    This contains a better intuitive description of the quantum Fourier transform than was given to me by my quantum computing module at university

  • @magius101
    @magius101 Рік тому +4

    This was really, really well done. Took me back to my physics/communications classes. Shor's algorithm, quite clever, it's use of Fourier was the chef's kiss.

  • @mhe0815
    @mhe0815 4 роки тому +257

    Thank you. After watching this, I feel smarter and dumber at the same time now.

    • @mizaelflores2360
      @mizaelflores2360 4 роки тому +24

      quantum intelligence

    • @skittybug6937
      @skittybug6937 4 роки тому +18

      @@mizaelflores2360 Schrodinger's IQ.

    • @cameosix7077
      @cameosix7077 3 роки тому +18

      Your IQ is in a superposition

    • @marek419
      @marek419 3 роки тому +1

      I feel like that after learning anything new lol

    • @Rhidayah
      @Rhidayah 2 роки тому

      So, now you can change your password account?

  • @jaiyash0
    @jaiyash0 5 років тому +178

    My neurons destructively interfered while watching this

    • @matheusbarbosa700
      @matheusbarbosa700 5 років тому +1

      Yeah man i lost my mind and no understood a fuck

  • @vaevictus4637
    @vaevictus4637 4 роки тому

    I actually could keep up with this better than I can keep up with Casey Muratori's content. That dude's brain is on another level.
    My point is that this was an extremely well done video and could you pretty please explain some of the stuff Casey talks about?

  • @NobodyYouKnow01
    @NobodyYouKnow01 Рік тому +1

    I’d like to thank you for the detailed explanation you provided in this video. I wouldn’t have understood Veritasium's video today without this one.

  • @pranshusrivastava8353
    @pranshusrivastava8353 5 років тому +30

    I got a phone call in the middle of the video. I cut it, and came back, and had just missed 10 seconds of the video. I had to go back 2 minutes to understand it again. That said, excellent video!

  • @S4R1N
    @S4R1N 5 років тому +394

    Quantum hacking, A.K.A 'Shor's Lightsaber'.

  • @KeithMakank3
    @KeithMakank3 3 роки тому

    dude the glow on the light saber well done!

  • @kamala7692
    @kamala7692 2 роки тому

    ahhhh, this is one of those videos
    *crackles knuckles* time to periodically rewatch this video until i not only remember the information, but understand and can explain said information

  • @squidpai_
    @squidpai_ 5 років тому +30

    introducing a new youtube channel:
    seventeenandahalfminutephysics

  • @CodyOsborn1
    @CodyOsborn1 5 років тому +140

    I was lost about two minutes in, but kept watching because it was fascinating!

    • @ntwede
      @ntwede 4 роки тому +13

      Hey, it's called minute physics. That means you understood two whole videos! Good on you.

    • @alanlahay8693
      @alanlahay8693 4 роки тому

      Same

  • @williamkopcha9442
    @williamkopcha9442 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you so, so much! As a graduate student in materials chemistry interested in this field, this video clears up so many of the gaps in the math that the literature just assumes the reader already knows (but I do not have the proper background for). So helpful!

  • @LLGilad
    @LLGilad 4 роки тому +2

    I saw this video a year ago and now I need this information for my homework, just one year after this video was published.

  • @vedantchaudhari7123
    @vedantchaudhari7123 4 роки тому +639

    I made a program that can guess passwords of 2 digits.

    • @SingularityHRT
      @SingularityHRT 4 роки тому +244

      You are on Your way to decrypt Quantum Encryption.

    • @MsSonali1980
      @MsSonali1980 4 роки тому +59

      Just keep up the good work.

    • @yashuppot3214
      @yashuppot3214 4 роки тому +23

      Thats simple as there is only 100 possibilities.

    • @stacklysm
      @stacklysm 4 роки тому +14

      @@yashuppot3214 Nice

    • @sujaybelsare
      @sujaybelsare 4 роки тому +11

      @@yashuppot3214 99*
      Lol sorry that bothered me a lottt

  • @ajmalnajath1399
    @ajmalnajath1399 5 років тому +983

    mybrain.exe has encountered an unexpected error.

  • @pablog80
    @pablog80 Рік тому

    Sooooo good. It reminded me of all the number theory I had to study years ago

  • @jhb1493
    @jhb1493 3 роки тому +1

    I worked at a major Telecom as a PM a while back, and one day my boss asked our team to brainstorm potential future issues or threats that the company might not be prepared for.
    I mentioned two things, both of which seemed obvious: pandemics and this.
    He said Quantum Computing was "science fiction" and, as for pandemics, this "isn't the middle ages". He still works there, I do not.

  • @JD-mz1rl
    @JD-mz1rl 4 роки тому +47

    11:50 that moment when you realize they've come up with something more substantial to teach in the text books since you've graduated from college

  • @YCCCm7
    @YCCCm7 5 років тому +456

    Internet: *Uses encryption.*
    Quantum Computers: It's free real estate.

    • @harikishore2514
      @harikishore2514 5 років тому +3

      Lol. Good one.

    • @dwardoyangy6586
      @dwardoyangy6586 5 років тому +11

      Quantum Computers: hold my superpositions

    • @MeadowBrook2000
      @MeadowBrook2000 5 років тому +5

      @g00gle minus That's the stupidest way ever.. instead you have to acess facebook database of servers and made the decryptions there, you don't need to have some trashy algorithm telling you to wait

    • @__nog642
      @__nog642 5 років тому +8

      @g00gle minus This is not about guessing passwords; did you even watch the video. All they would have to do is sit on public wifi and listen to passing traffic. Usually, on most sites, like facebook, you are protected by HTTPS which uses SSL/TLS encryption, but those use RSA for the initial key exchange, which can be cracked as mentioned in this video. So all the attacker needs to do is save all the network communication, take it home to their quantum computer, break all the RSA encryption to get the symmetric keys, then use the symmetric keys to read all the data sent between you and the sites you visit. That includes your facebook password, if you logged into facebook while they were listening (or at least a password hash, which can still be used to log in in that case). No password guessing involved.

    • @Execuor
      @Execuor 5 років тому +2

      @g00gle minus they don't need to guess your password they could break into facebooks network steal the login database and then use the algorithm to decrypt your password in a very short amount of time. Or they could do a man in the middle attack and listen in to your whatsapp messages, record everything and break the encryption later.

  • @TheBluePhoenix008
    @TheBluePhoenix008 3 роки тому +1

    I think I tried watching this a year ago but gave up. I'm here again to try and watch the whole video. Wish me luck.

  • @roseproctor3177
    @roseproctor3177 Рік тому

    thank you for making a video that goes into more detail than just (superpositions b fast)

  • @DarkThomy
    @DarkThomy 4 роки тому +66

    The fact the bass stops playing one minute in scares me somehow..

  • @flisboac
    @flisboac 5 років тому +91

    Felt like I was back at my Number Theory class in CS. Scarily amazing stuff.

  • @keokawasaki7833
    @keokawasaki7833 3 роки тому +6

    Too neat!!!
    I am a programmer and I would totally love to write algorithms for quantum computers.

    • @codelif
      @codelif 2 роки тому

      yep, if that comes out to be a job description. "Quantum Programmer"

    • @akawikaa
      @akawikaa Рік тому

      You better start math and physics

  • @marinenukem
    @marinenukem 3 роки тому +1

    This was an amazing video, very educational, and I understood less than half of it. All I know is that we're looking for P to get N.

  • @condescendingonlineman2136
    @condescendingonlineman2136 5 років тому +325

    >minute physics
    *>over 17 minutes*

    • @bernardchapman1002
      @bernardchapman1002 4 роки тому

      My cell phone is very small so I see it as minute

    • @viceversadetroit
      @viceversadetroit 4 роки тому

      correction, that would be one minute to the power of 17. lol

    • @EpicScizor
      @EpicScizor 4 роки тому

      @@viceversadetroit (1 minute)^17 = 1 minute^17
      I, uh, don't know what a 17-cubed minute is, but its not 17 minutes.

    • @viceversadetroit
      @viceversadetroit 4 роки тому

      @@EpicScizor it was a joke not literal but I guess that's lost on you

    • @RohanJosephrohantmp
      @RohanJosephrohantmp 4 роки тому

      > Condescending online Man
      > Pedantic

  • @heavenbuilder2365
    @heavenbuilder2365 5 років тому +64

    I'd tried reading up on Shor's algorithm before, but this is the first time I've actually understood it! Thank you so much!

    • @twister5752
      @twister5752 4 роки тому +3

      that makes one of us

    • @youngalwyn1124
      @youngalwyn1124 4 роки тому

      Lucas the Shepard - you’re kidding, aren’t you

  • @thsxi
    @thsxi 3 роки тому

    I love how I watch this video and don’t understand anything but still find it enjoyable

  • @simas6190
    @simas6190 3 роки тому

    Great work. Keep it up!

  • @infinitelyexplosive4131
    @infinitelyexplosive4131 5 років тому +102

    I've taken an intro QM course and some basic math, and after watching this video I'm now left with the strange feeling of knowing many of the words he's saying but having no idea how they work together in this context.

    • @nutbuster3862
      @nutbuster3862 5 років тому +7

      infinitelyExplosive Words I learned from this video: Numbers, Shor's lightsaber, Hi, ?, N.

    • @xyz.ijk.
      @xyz.ijk. 5 років тому +2

      Exactly!

    • @utvara1
      @utvara1 5 років тому

      There is no way the next thing humanity achieves is even more mathematical computational power. So lame. Where are new vehicles, new materials, new engines, new EFFICIENT and COST EFFECTIVE sources of power, underwater settlements, medical revolutions, home acessories.
      It is rape of human resources and talent pool to invest more into this field and I just know it will fail and it should fail. I want regeneration, flying cars and trips to Moon and not better hd porn or quicker pc fuck that garbage.

    • @shanematthews1985
      @shanematthews1985 5 років тому +3

      Isn't that the point though, they say if you think you understand quantum mechanics then you actually don't understand it

    • @nutbuster3862
      @nutbuster3862 5 років тому +9

      utvara1 but that "better pc" will help do all the things you just said you want.

  • @marcbenton7211
    @marcbenton7211 4 роки тому +47

    "We've glossed over a ton of details"
    14:37

  • @media1critter
    @media1critter 3 роки тому +1

    Guessing on multiple choice questions taken to the next level

  • @teewenhui2717
    @teewenhui2717 2 місяці тому

    brilliantly explained. kudos.