@@rogerigez21 Bahh...I'm torn, I love both but for different reasons. Novak might be one of the best sportsmen ever, a total machine. Federer was close mentally but was Messi...we're just lucky to have seen them all play at the same time with Nadal too. Lucky unless you're Andy Murray anyway...
@@rogerigez21 Yes, he is. Don't get me wrong here; I'm not a Djokovic fan, but greatness is measured in achievements, and Djokovic has simply won more stuff than Federer. That's all there is to it.
Roger actually have most overall match wins and titles among the Big 3 (Nole diehard’s negatively say: Roger played all ATP tournament levels so had more titles overall including 250 events, just ended with a few less M1000 wins-Novak chose to play mostly just m1000+ tournaments) Federer’s 20 slam total (almost 50%+ than next total ever, 14 which was a feat after decades!) actually is only around 1/10 less than Nad/Djoker who were single slam specialists so much to the point they amassed more overall (reverse of Fed’s many more total match & tournament wins but including less desirable/less big titles) Fed was most successful on surfaces other than clay (No. 1 @ Wimbledon & US Open, & No. 2 @ ATP Finals & AO; No. 1 record grass court win streak & hard court win streak). Highest sustained tennis prime: -Record 14 slams in 6 years -Astonishing consecutive records 237 weeks No. 1 3 seasons wins 91%+ with a top % in Big Three, 95.3% (Bonus: + a 91.5% season doubling Djoker & Rafa’s respectively having two 90%+ won seasons) P.S. in the Fedal rivalry, it’s noteworthy RF won their last 7/8 matches. P.P.S. Nowadays as Djokovic has enjoyed the lack of multi-slam opponents to chase his last slam/M1000 titles and Fedal retiring, Nole fans can’t use the “weak era” argument to try to downplay Fed’s astounding main prime-and by close inspection Fed did spend a 5 year slow rise to overcome the previous greats to pave the way, and right in his prime he still had a few long time rivals and importantly Nadal was toe-to-toe even from 2005, and also as teens Djoker and Murray enjoyed their first wins to Fed in 2006/2007!
the million dollar question in tennis wich upset a lot of people , is who would be the best if there wasnt such a homogenisation of surfaces making the game very one dimensional compared to before making tennis a powerbaseline show that caused serve and volley to go extinct . thats my opinion everyone is free to have their one
I don't play tennis, but I watched tennis because of this legend like Federer,,, his innovative shot skill makes this game much more entertaining,,, how excellent his one handed backhand is!!
Federer was of course graceful, aesthetic and elegant, but "the most, ever, without a doubt" can only be said by people who've never seen tennis from the previous century.
The greatest tennis player of all times.
ROGER FEDERER
Novak Djokovic.
@@FL2070nope. Djokovic is boring and robotic.
@@rogerigez21 Bahh...I'm torn, I love both but for different reasons. Novak might be one of the best sportsmen ever, a total machine. Federer was close mentally but was Messi...we're just lucky to have seen them all play at the same time with Nadal too. Lucky unless you're Andy Murray anyway...
@@rogerigez21 Yes, he is. Don't get me wrong here; I'm not a Djokovic fan, but greatness is measured in achievements, and Djokovic has simply won more stuff than Federer. That's all there is to it.
Roger Federer undoubtedly was and will ever be the unique genius of tennis.
Mac Enroe was a genius, sorry the genius!
His highlights are mostly shots nobody has even attempted before. goat.
Spectacular!
A delight for our eyes...
The Swiss Maestro's incomparable art, class and magic!
🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭🇨🇭
Yes indeed he was the best player that ever played
For sure
True, a lot of us still like to watch his highlights
Djokovic: the greatest winner
Federer: the magician, the teacher, the artist, the peRFection, the GOAT.
Yep, I'd go with that...I said on another comment, Novak is one of the best sportsmen of my lifetime. Machine at his peak.
A genius
Top 3/4 player ever!
? you mean the best to have ever played.
I will take that.
Three quarters is less than 1 so that's like even better than 1st best 🤷♂
VOTE BLUE!!!!!
Pure choke of all time
Federer in his prime was just different. To me he is the goat even though others may have won more tournaments.
Roger actually have most overall match wins and titles among the Big 3 (Nole diehard’s negatively say: Roger played all ATP tournament levels so had more titles overall including 250 events, just ended with a few less M1000 wins-Novak chose to play mostly just m1000+ tournaments)
Federer’s 20 slam total (almost 50%+ than next total ever, 14 which was a feat after decades!) actually is only around 1/10 less than Nad/Djoker who were single slam specialists so much to the point they amassed more overall (reverse of Fed’s many more total match & tournament wins but including less desirable/less big titles)
Fed was most successful on surfaces other than clay (No. 1 @ Wimbledon & US Open, & No. 2 @ ATP Finals & AO; No. 1 record grass court win streak & hard court win streak).
Highest sustained tennis prime:
-Record 14 slams in 6 years -Astonishing consecutive records
237 weeks No. 1
3 seasons wins 91%+ with a top % in Big Three, 95.3%
(Bonus: + a 91.5% season doubling Djoker & Rafa’s respectively having two 90%+ won seasons)
P.S. in the Fedal rivalry, it’s noteworthy RF won their last 7/8 matches.
P.P.S. Nowadays as Djokovic has enjoyed the lack of multi-slam opponents to chase his last slam/M1000 titles and Fedal retiring, Nole fans can’t use the “weak era” argument to try to downplay Fed’s astounding main prime-and by close inspection Fed did spend a 5 year slow rise to overcome the previous greats to pave the way, and right in his prime he still had a few long time rivals and importantly Nadal was toe-to-toe even from 2005, and also as teens Djoker and Murray enjoyed their first wins to Fed in 2006/2007!
Federer never had to make disgusting sounds to generate power…a real class act.
the million dollar question in tennis wich upset a lot of people , is who would be the best if there wasnt such a homogenisation of surfaces making the game very one dimensional compared to before making tennis a powerbaseline show that caused serve and volley to go extinct . thats my opinion everyone is free to have their one
I don't play tennis, but I watched tennis because of this legend like Federer,,, his innovative shot skill makes this game much more entertaining,,, how excellent his one handed backhand is!!
Federer was of course graceful, aesthetic and elegant, but "the most, ever, without a doubt" can only be said by people who've never seen tennis from the previous century.
Simply the GOAT ! A Frenchy !