Matt Walsh in Shambles over Ohio's Abortion Results
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лис 2023
- I wasn't planning on making a video this week, but I just had to make this quick one in celebration of election results across the country, some involving abortion rights.
Support me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/user?u=3308388
Follow me on Twitter: / stickprofessor
Become a Member: / @professorstick
Check out my merch: teespring.com/stores/professo...
Original Video: • Ohio Just Made A Horri...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This video may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
In ND republicans refused to vote for free food for all school lunches because it’s “not their responsibility.” I never want to here a republican refer to them selves as “pro-life”
I found the video. It’s on UA-cam titled “Republicans Kill Free School Lunch Bill” by “More Perfect Union.” It appears as a UA-cam short, but shows the clip where republican Sen. Mike Wobbema refers to “personal responsibility” so not only is a fetus a child, but a child is also an adult.
"All of the children in the womb just lost all of their human rights......." Strange perspective, given the US is _the only country in the world_ which continues to refuse to ratify the International Convention on the Rights of the Child. Children in the US don't have the same human rights as children in the rest of the world. With among the highest rates of child poverty in the OECD and the highest rates of both child and maternal mortality in the developed world, it's very hard to take the US "pro-life" proponents seriously.
Yeah, pro-life ends after birth
@@anserbauer309 Indeed. The USA is the only developed nation on Earth where children get (routinely) mass murdered at school and the nation's collective response is to do NOTHING. It's sickening.
Exactly, they are purely forced-birth and nothing else. They couldn't care less about children, the adoption system, the school system, nothing.
As an Ohioan I am glad this passed. Let's get more states to do this.
its not over.. the GOP in Ohio is actively seeking ways to overturn the results like they always do..
@@scooby45247 Are they gonna go crying to the SC again?
@@scooby45247 Damn...
Isn't it ironic that for decades they were screaming about how the people and not courts should decide on this issue?
And now, in less than a decade, they've done a complete 180 with that philosophy once they realized the people aren't making the decisions they desire.
@@kingbadmovie Exactly.
You are spot on, Prof. It's not about children - otherwise Republicans wouldn't vote against social programs aimed at helping children living in poverty. It's about control and preservation of their power to decide for others.
Except it is about children gestated ones. Like the 11 year old who was raped or the 18 year who can't have a baby "right now" or the 6 year old who if mummy has another baby he won't be able to get proper care because minimum wage won't feed, clothe and house 2 kids, or the 8 year old whose mum is trapped in a domestic violence situation because of an unwanted pregnancy.... those children who this is about, those children who are harmed by abortion bans.
This is such a ridiculous argument that I see repeated frequently. You seem to think the only way to help someone is to throw taxpayer money at government programs. Meanwhile you ignore that there are many charities out there that help children and adults in poverty, most of which are started and funded by conservatives and religious organizations. So claiming that they don't care about children or life in general is ignorant.
@@PrometheusMMIVyeah, because we should the goverment, the instituion whose job is to care for the citizen's needs, do it's only job when there are other people who do the same thing?
Jesus, just stfu already.
Nope. They need unwanted children to sell. Evangelicals make bank on adoption fees.
@@PrometheusMMIV We don't have to pretend that the current crop of 'conservatives' don't care about children or life in general after birth. They show us EVERY CHANCE THEY GET.
If Matt Walsh is mad, maybe were on the right track
Most def
You mean his reaction to how stupid and selfish we have become as a society where we devalue human life even the life of the unborn and abortions are shouted out and celebrated? Or the fact that teachers and doctors can't define what a woman or a man is these days? But here we are in Clown World.
Wasn't there a list of people who have spoken negatively about abortion and then proceeded to get one secretly anyways?
Which is why I lament the lack of Douglas Adams' Point-Of-View Gun.
I'm pretty sure there was also list of sitting pro-life senators and representatives who paid hush money for their MISTRESSES to get abortions as well.
The irony of Matt Walsh calling anyone else a "sociopath" is astounding.
He also calls everyone else narcissists.
Which is ironic, because he shows signs of narcissistic personality disorder
Oh, Matt Walsh's salty tears are the perfect seasoning on the delicious pie that was the Ohio result.
Pretty much every right-wing take I've seen from this has boiled down to Principal Skinner's "Am I out of touch?... No. No it's the children who are wrong."
Well when there is so much disinformation and fear-mongering among left-wing voters it changes the context ever so slightly.
@@RDeathmark ah... yes, disinformation and fear-mongering. about what exactly?
@@RDeathmark
Ah yes, disinformation and fear-mongering like "they are sacrificing children" or "5g is mind-control" or "they are injecting microchips with the vaccines"...
Oh wait, that is all right-wing.
@@spanke2999did the idiot leave a comment over here that got erased or deleted?
Did you see Alec Gunter go to one of Map Walsh’s QnA’s and asked him why it’s okay to force a 13 year old to give birth to their rapist’s child? He made him stress tf out and sweat buckets!
Of course Matt couldn’t answer the question without being vague and sugarcoating it.
I'm sure this is a totally legit and not at all exaggerated description of how Matt reacted. I'm sure Matt didn't just point out that every time the left brings up The Fringe cases to justify abortion but it is not in any way about The Fringe cases. The Fringe cases are just used to justify the wholesale Slaughter of millions of babies. And that if it comes down to it we will happily force a 13-year-old to have a rapists baby (ever heard of the sins of the father not being the sins of the Son? The baby's life is no less valid because of the circumstances of its creation) especially if that means it stops millions of other babies from being murdered as a form of contraception
@@RDeathmark Nobody is murdering babies, however you forced birthers are killing women ( actual living and breathing human being that have lives).
@DriveInFreak the purpose of abortion is baby murder. A failed abortion is an alive baby. And being pro-life I can absolutely put the mother's life before the babies but only if it is one or the other.
@@RDeathmark
Zero babies are harmed during abortions. Literally zero. But then, I don't expect an irrational religious right-winger to understand simple things like "logic".
@@RDeathmark it's not a baby... I'm sure you know the differences between a baby and a fetus. why not being correct? murdering babies is having a profit oriented health care system where babies literally die because the parents can't afford health care. or a society with a totally broken concept of gun owner ship that managed it to have 'gun wounds' as the top reason for child death, killing babies is the result of cutting regulations regarding the environment and cutting funding for social work and environment protection... I could literally go on and will demonstrate so many areas where actual babies are killed and not one of your pro life friends will really against... because?
It's nice to see horrible people deal with Ls for once.
He won't see at as an L though because Christians largely see everything as a win or as a sign that they are in the right. They can't afford to feel anything else otherwise they would realise how crazy their faith is.
And a surprising OhioW.
@@KylenKiomakadon't worry. The radio active spiders will wipe the slate clean soon lol
Even if a fetus was a human being, no human has the right to use someone else's organs....
Except for the obvious fact that the one whose organs are being used literally consented for that human to be there.
@@arkx.5365
Not in all cases and consent can be withdrawn...
@@The5armdamput33 99.9% of all cases are consensual, and what's left doesn't justify the outcome. Consent can't be withdrawn once the decision has already been made. That's like killing someone, and then when the cops try to arrest you, you claim "Oh but I no longer wish to kill that person." No logic at all.
@@The5armdamput3399.9% of all cases are consensual, and what's left doesn't justify the outcome. Consent can't be withdrawn once the decision has already been made. That's like physically harming someone, and then when the cops try to arrest you, you claim "Oh but I no longer wish to harm that person." No logic at all.
@@daepicpiguy8539
"99.9% of all cases are consensual"
- I'm going to dispute those numbers.... from what I could find, rape-related pregnancies are about 3-5%....
- Also, even when sex is consensual, pregnancy isn't necessarily consensual...
- And when there is consent to become pregnant, doesn't mean that there is consent to remain pregnant....
"and what's left doesn't justify the outcome."
- It does... An abortion is justified by much less than rape... so that justification isn't even necessary...
"Consent can't be withdrawn once the decision has already been made."
Consent certainly can be withdrawn... The analogy you tried to compare it to had nothing to do with consent either...
- It's more like consenting to someone living in your house... you can revoke consent and kick them out at any time, provided there's no legally binding contract...
Aah, poor Matt, moral people exist no matter how much he lies....
I’m glad it passed in Ohio. Especially since this the state that refused to allow a 10 year old girl that had been raped to get an abortion, forcing her to leave state for that. I will forever be disgusted by my home state for thinking they had a right to keep a little girl from getting the care she needed.
Just imagine the energy in the room when women finally found out they were no longer going to be forced to be incubators and have their bodily autonomy stripped from them and slightly treated less like property because let's face it the Republicans still treat women like property
Matt "I don't respect my children's boundaries" Walsh cares for children's rights? sure he does
Matt "16y/o girls ought be culturally-encouraged to get wed & bred" Walsh.
He's called MAP Walsh for a reason.
republicans: the states should decide!
*states decides*
republicans: >:3
Honestly no I don't think the states should be able to legalize infanticide any more than they should be able to legalize slavery because both are abhorrent.
@@RDeathmark comparing a medical procedure to actual slavery is wild, you are thoroughly deluded
@@RDeathmark No one is talking about infanticide. We're talking about an medical procedure.
Your incorrect use of the word is a poor attempt to generate an emotional response.
@@RDeathmarkhope you arent a christian then. Cuz if so, your book calls for slavery. So go out there and fight for your rights!
@@RDeathmark Yet here you are advocating for making people incubation slaves.
It was recently similar in Michigan. The 2022 Michigan Proposal 3 (which passed) codifies reproductive rights (including abortion) into our constitution. I'm a man who was never involved in an abortion, but I realize it's an important right. So I voted for it, as anyone should.
What a piece of work Walsh is 😐 Good job, Stick.
Look, as funny as it is to say people should use the toilet while at work, that doesn't mean defecation is labor.
They use emotional guilt to justify their reasoning. Completely ignoring any practicalities and welfare of the women who are having to personally deal with these situations.
God, I got into a debate with one of those in my college. They have booths set up where people promote stuff and I like to stop by and talk.
One of those was an anti choice booth. I have autism so throughout most of the debate it sounded like I was about to cry but then we got to miscarriage vs abortion.
I like to think that I won because of that.
Poor Walshykins, people aren't doing what he says!
Saying child sacrifice is the stupidest thing I've ever heard
Could have been worse. He could have said 'Satanic child sacrifice' and I'm somewhat surprised he didn't.
Pass the adrenochrome 👹
I think there is a good emotional counterpoint to the "baby murder" line, like "pro forced birth" or "rape supporters" It may be crude, but if you want to return the same energy to the anti-abortion mob we do have our own war words
Rape is bad, the baby didn't rape the mother, the baby has done nothing to deserve death. Who is forcing the birth? who is forcing the pregnancy in the first place? We keep telling women to keep their legs closed and they won't need the abortions in the first place. But baby murder isn't an acceptable form of contraception. You like the choice right? But you don't like the choice that made the baby in the first place. That choice doesn't matter.
@RDeathmark So you admit you're punishing women for "not keeping their legs closed". All this is over some puritanical fee fees bullshit, offense to your delicate sensibilities that has absolutely nothing to do with giving a shit about children, so thanks for the clarification. Most of you anti choice losers never actually say it, so I commend you for rhe honesty.
1) i have had two abortions. One due to rape, one due to a mess up in birth control. 2) i have zero regret. I was in college for bot, and could not imagine my life with a child then or now. 3) when i was raped, the trauma was intense. I dislike sex and being touched now, even after 20 years of therapy. The experience of waking up and puking because someone harmed me, and left his monster inside of me…i would literally have killed myself if i had been forced to carey to term. Cause he left himself inside me, it was using me to live. It was being raped again and again. I was able to terminate quickly, and start to heal as best as i could.
4) the failed birt control happened my first year in college. I was 19, and worked to put myself theough school as an oil rig diver in the summer for the marine mammal protection division of NMFS. You cannot dive when you are pregnant, so i would have had to stoo my job, which funded my schooling. Being pregnant is really hard in competitive schools, so i likely would have dropped out. Other than diving i had no skills, so would have been a low income earner. Which would have meant needing federal or state support for the fetus and me. On the other hand, now i contribute significant funds in taxes, bck to the state.
“Keep your legs closed”. Ive never had a child. Do not want one. I am in a loving relationship, and despite my trauma, so have sex. So should we NOT have sex in our now 20 year long marriage? Really? And if, t 47, i were to get pregnant, i would abort again, cause its not very safe for me or the fetus when you are that old, but we still have some wacky, badly for,ed eggs, that can get fertalized.
So take your “its all a woman’s fault cause she had sex” and shove it. Women are not incubators. We are the first and only consideration in our own lives, unless and until that woman elects to put others first.
@@tanyanguyen3704thank you for sharing. I found it difficult to read and I hope you are now in a good place.
@@nedzed3663 I'm not punishing the women for anything. They made the decision they can live with the consequences. And so can the baby. The baby is all I care about. I do care about not punishing the baby for the decisions of the mother. And if there was a way to compromise on the rape issue I'd be happy to do so put the left has proved over and over again that they will take a mile
Everything you need to know about Matt Walsh is that he feels entitled to be the sole authority to answer, "What Is a Woman?" (title of his book)
GOP are not pro life, they are pro birth. Pro life would take into consideration of the life of the mother and/or the life of the child.
Funnily enough, I heard Kaylie Mackacacky say something similar just the other day, advising the GOP to talk up “life of the mother” to counter the bad optics politics of their position.
I honestly do not believe that any pro-life person _actually_ cares about life. I am convinced, by their actions, that it is all about control.
I haven't seen a pro-lifer also insist on mandatory organ and blood donations.
absolutely. they don't hold to any other pro life stance, on immigrants, trans people, guns, the environment, universal healthcare... hell, GOP state senators even gave themselves a raise while cutting school lunch funding. no, the only time they care about life is when they can USE it to entrap women.
It's taken you this long to figure it out. The "pro life" side never once cared about anything other than their own self-important moral supremacy.
@@aaronabbey2604
That has been my position for a few decades now.
And to expand... they are actually pro-birth, as a punishment / consequence of sexual activity outside of the intention to produce children in the family unit. They don't even recognize that they are becoming a taliban of sorts... wanting full social and governmental control over women and men who don't fit the heterosexual, authoritative stereotype.
If my wife didn't have an abortion she would have died so when it comes to abortions I'm pro-life I want my wife to live it made me sad that we lost our child but with my wife still alive we were able to have two more children
I am pro-choice:
Natural and healthy biological functions do not require choice in order to function, and if such functions require a series of actions derived from previous choices in order to start, then that is where the choice resides.
If choice is the issue then where the choices were made is where the evidence starts.
@@wadler00I really don't follow what you're referring to.
@@wadler00
Talking in circles...
You mean you are "pro choice" instead of "pro life" then. You want women to be able to choose whether or not to be or stay pregnant. Please don't mix the terms up as it could lead to confusion and anger from both sides.
@@KnakuanaRkahe’s saying the choice lies on whether the woman has sex, and we all know how absurd that claim is.
Wonder if Matt Walsh celebrates every time the rights of guns, not the people using them, gets put before the lives they kill.
Guns don't have rights, people do. The right to defend yourself with any weapon you chose, and the right to bodily autonomy, this isn't hard.
People have rights, government has powers, but not the power to restrict rights. People first, individual freedoms and liberties.
@@dragonhealer7588 States have a right to have a regulated militia, average civilians do not have the right to be a militia.
@@peterprice2048
Factually incorrect Sir. You might want to look that up instead of repeating agenda talking points. If you bothered to read the federalist papers and the antifederalists papers of our founders in school civics class, you wouldn't say such things, because I'm assuming you are an honest interlocutor.
@@peterprice2048
PS. "Regulated" in context, doesn't mean what it means today. Pull up a relevant 1700's dictionary.
@@dragonhealer7588 I do know the difference between the reload speeds and muzzle velocities of a musket and todays arms. If the supreme court wants to turn the clock back they might want to take that into consideration.
Guess mattey hasnt read the bable and all the child sacrifice?
As someone who got pregnant at 12 from abuse, I was told by my church it was "gods gift" and "gods will to keep it"
If thats truly the case was its gods will my abuser did what they did? Does that mean every abuser is sent by god? Luckily i miscarried very early on cause i was , you know 12, but i never stopped being sick at hearing anyone claim children having babies is "gods will"
If that's your god you're evil for following him.
People are absolutely disgusting
As an uninvolved human, I am sorry you had to go through that.
Frrr. I've been saying for years at this point that religion and emotion (for the most part) should stay out of REAL WORLD decisions. Too often science is held back by these stupid moral arguments.
@@RocketboyX thank you so much for your kind words 🥰
Please keep supporting reproductive rights! So many more kids than you'd think are effected by strict abortion laws.
Its barbaric what they want for these pregnant abused children.
MAP Walsh and his usual insane ramblings
Ironic.
"All of the children in the womb just lost all of their human rights......." Strange perspective, given the US is _the only country in the world_ which continues to refuse to ratify the International Convention on the Rights of the Child. Children in the US don't have the same human rights as children in the rest of the world. With among the highest rates of child poverty in the OECD and the highest rates of both infant and maternal mortality in the developed world, it's very hard to take the US "pro-life" proponents seriously.
pssssst... you missed the point here! no facts, just EmOtiOns...
@@spanke2999 Yeah. I just feel like if more Americans understood just how far behind the rest of the developed world they have fallen on things like the human freedom index, human rights to healthcare, the rights of the child, standard of living (IHDI), the world democracy index etc they might just think...... "Well bugger me! Maybe it's time I looked at the facts, cuz _emotions_ aren't cutting it".
@@anserbauer309 Well the 'evil' in this case is patriotism. The more patriotic the population is the more blind it becomes to what's really going on.
"I'm the common man. I chop wood. See that forest behind me? Grrrr. I chop wood. Grrrr."
He's a lumberjack and he's ok...
The way I see things
If a physical connection is required for a living organism to survive, then it is the decision of the "host" to keep it or to remove said connection.
The death of said living organism is effectively just collateral damage.
You shouldn't be forced to let your body being used as a life support system. it ought to be your choice.
I worded it this way because a fetus is very similar to a parasite when you think about it.
I personally only grant said fetus "human rights" once they are able to survive on their own without said connection to the "host".
Before that point, the only rights the fetus has is the rights the "host" gives them.
Well said, Professor Stick! Anything that impacts the wellness and welfare of a woman should be her choice to make, not the state or federal government’s choice………
Good job Ohio!🎉😊
From now on im calling abortion “Rogue cell expulsion”
As an Ohio woman, watching uber conservatives lose their shit that we used the system to destroy their grand master plan makes me laugh so hard 😂😂😂
Matt Walsh has children? Color me surprised someone could spend enough time in the same space as him to maintain a conversation, let alone a relationship...
I cringe whenever I hear anyone refer them as "pro-life" regardless of what their view on this issue is. That's the last thing they are. Forced-birthers or Anti-choice are far more accurate descriptors. Call them what they are please.
A comparison I heard about this was imagine you have someone dying of an organ failure. You also have a recently deceased person that had this organ perfectly functioning and is capable of saving this person's life, but oh look: Not an organ donor. There is nothing the hospital can do to take this dead person's organ to save a living one because that dead person did not give them consent to take it.
That dead person has more bodily autonomy than what "pro-lifers" are trying to allow for LIVING women. Banning abortions would mean that a women, once she conceives a child, now has less rights to her own organs than a dead corpse!
Love how far right Republicans rationalize the loss as "we lost because we were too lenient with what we wanted."
I imagine they use the rationale elsewhere in life: "The man wouldn't sell me his car when I offered him $100 for it. If I only offered him $50 instead I'd have sealed the deal."
I am pro-abortion the same way i'm pro-heart-surgery and pro-chemotherapy. We don't need to give into their framing of how bad abortion is and how we wish it didn't happen or whatever, i am fucking glad as shit that there are abortions and I see zero reason to have some negative bias against it when it's beneficial for the large majority of folks who have one.
I feel bad for people for whom it is a bad experience, obviously, but in no way does that justify a negative bias towards a medical procedure that has likely greatly improved the quality of life of a large majority of the millions upon millions of would-have-been parents who benefitted from it.
I notice that Matt's diaper fetish dolls are missing from his shelves.
prenatal healthcare is a patients right NOT the states..
Abortion makes me sad. That's not a reason to strip bodily rights from half the population 🤷♀️
(Also if I get preggers I will likely die. Condoms & BC can fail, & these conservatives oppose both anyway. So does Walsh think I should just deny my husband s3x forever, or risk my life every time & "put it in god's hands"? 🤔)
Yes that is literally what he wants because "it's all part of god's plan" 😒
I don't think abortion makes anyone happy. The happiness is the bodily autonomy of pregnant people.
I'm sorry it's so risky for you. Hoping you stay safe x
The pro-choice side can use the same emotional tactics as the force birth side. Forced birthers, if true to their side, will fully ban abortion procedures not unlike the actual Catholic stance. The only abortions they wouldn't be able to criminalize are the spontaneous ones, aka miscarriage. The side's rhetoric would rather sacrifice the mother, "the ultimate act of love" they'd say, instead of saving them so they can try again.
This is why forced birthers haven't looked into first extending measures to fetuses to ensure they get full treatment as a born human would. The religious roots of their side, often derived from the Catholic stance, don't allow it. Fetuses don't have social security numbers, they often won't get funerary rights, pregnant woman aren't considered as 2 people where something like that would matter, and this goes on and on.
And this ignores the rest of their side's politics in regards to children after they're born. They don't support extending maternity or paternity leave, making it paid (even if reduced), making baby products free up to some amount of years, and more. In some areas, they're even regressing by trying to bring back child labor!
It looks like they want to have more children to work in factories and mines as rock bottom cheap, and expendable, labour.
I was so proud of Ohio for passing issue 1 and getting women's rights back. It makes me think we can actually get this state going in the right direction again. Of course the Ohio GOP with their gerrymandered power have already vowed to try and find someway around the amendment because they're assholes like that.
It is pretty telling when they only care about childern until they take their first breath.
Thanks for the video
Ah yes the guy who hates no fault divorce and was a Terrible husband has terrible political takes, I will not be surprised by the degeneracy of Matt Walsh at this point.
He also thinks teen girls are the peak of attractiveness (and I don't mean 18-19).
Dude is just shy of straight up admitting he finds children sexually attractive.
lets not forget he denies mental illness
@@DivianceHe also put what he considers as CeePee into his documentary btw
As an outsider it's weird Replublic american keep saying abortion is evil but they dont really do much for pregnant woman and new mother. It's like as soon as a child is born they dont care about it anymore which is so bizzare.
As an Ohioan, I can say that I am happy that Issue 1 (regarding reproductive rights) and Issue 2 (legalization of Marijuana) passed. Our governor said publicly that he has heard the voices of the people loud and clear, and that is why he is trying to get these amendments modified before they become enshrined. I am hopeful that A that this does not happen, and B that people remember this the next time this clown comes up for election. I hope people see him as the guy who yet again tried to overturn the voice of the people and try to delegitimize an election.
Seriously? A ballot measure passes, 57% to 43%, and the freaking governor is trying to step in and stop it? All while saying "The voice of the people on this matter is loud and clear"????? Like dude, yeah it is, the voices are telling you to pass and sign the fucking thing! Do our votes not even matter anymore?
My cousin, an ER nurse, made the comparison, "Gee, I'd like to treat that gunshot wound, but I'm pro 2nd amendment" to abortion and it's medical necessity.
We were shitface drunk so something might have been lost in conversation.
Yes, on both issues. I'm glad we stood together.
Matt Walsh being unhappy is a joy to behold lol
Spot on!
Matt Walsh, the answer to a question no one asked.
As a pro-choicer, I reject the argument that "the right to abort is between the woman and her doctor". That's just an appeal to authority.
Matt Walsh truly wants the Stepford Wives to be reality.
Matt Walshis a dollar store Matt Powell!
So at the moment of fertilization, they should be on the census and mothers should immediately be able to claim them on taxes and for child support and WIC and all those programs
Yeah sounds good
“Enshrined child sacrifice” how idiotic is your thinking to say it like that…
I am not from the US - What was the "heart" in the "Heart-Beat bill" referring to? The heart of the mother or the abortionist?
In the Book of Numbers, God commanded unfaithful women to go through abortion. This means as a true Christian, it's my right to force women to get abortions if they got pregnant by anybody not their husband.
And yet Walsh gets his panties in a wad if you call him a pedophile, despite his own comments against the age of consent.
majority voting for the rights of a minority is always a bad idea
I agree
1:45 ish - shaving is the ending of human rights
we do have an emotional leg to stand on for pro-choice. the side-effects of pregnancies can ruin or end the lives of the mother. if THAT'S not more important that a fetus with no conscience, I don't know what is.
You have to consider that Wash doesn't consider women fully human. He thinks fetuses and cells should have more rights than women and actually born children. They don't care what happens after birth
Conservatism is growing big in US along with ignorance and stupidity
Here's a solution; If the life of a pre-born is so important, why not extend voting rights to pre-borns. After all, they should have a say in their own future. Also, to motivate people to vote, maybe incur a fine for not voting? We'll call it 'voting obligation'.🤪
It’s bold to assume Matt doesn’t understand the pro choice argument, I think he knows very well he just lies because he want to control women and follow his holy book
Being alive or dead is pretty one dimensional
As somone who is pro life for secular and scientific reasons(albeit basic) (I am an atheist btw) It pains me that Matt Walsh does not understand why people would be happy about this
I will get questions I think so I will clarify. I lean democrat, but do my research before voting(republicans are not looking good RN IMO).
My abortion stance is based on what you are doing in relation to how a healthy pregnancy works. My argument leans all on the physical.
I understand various nuances with abortion, but there are cases that just makes me go HELL NAH.
Excellent!👍💙💖💙🥰✌
Wet Mulch is upset? Oh no.....
I'm on the fence on this issue. Sure, in cases where the pregnancy might be endangering to the life of the mother and/or the result of criminal activity that might lead to more trauma in the future, I 100% agree. But on pure lack of care, I don't. Are there any conditions on this?
Imagine Walsh's main argument is not but appealing to emotion and sophistry. Wait, you don't need to. Walsh has been using really bad words to replace abortion. I guess I should label pro-lifer as forced conception advocators or mother terminators.
They just need to stay in their lane.
Funny how a lot of how you articulated the pro life POV was exactly how pro lifers describe pro choice POV
Well the fetus is always human the question is when does it become a being. While it is hard to find the line when this happens there does come a point when it obviously occurs.
Here’s a problem with abortion that can’t be ignored. Walsh wasn’t.
If you're anti-choice, you're saying you believe you don't own your organs. That you should be forced to be a life-support machine for someone else, regardless of what *you* think.
@@AnonYmous-yj9ib OH SHIT. I read it as "Walsh was speaking about what abortion really is". I see way too many illiterate conservatives making awful arguments, I apologize angrydog.
You should debate them
Now when we have the right to legally unalive children we are coming for you Matt "diaperman" Walsh./s
Now see how ridiculous it sounds? Makes for a good chuckle tho.
They don't see the bodily autonomy of women as 1 dimension, they see it as a twin points, a binary, thing : It's right or it's bad. Even as an 1D thing, there is still ample place for a spectrum.
Matt Walsh use so much loaded speech that it hurts.
If have a lot more respect for "pro life" advocates if they; believed in the affordable care act, so that having a baby didn't cost thousands. Were okay with contraception rights and not upset when women use the pill. Didn't also push anti abortion laws onto unwanted sex pregnancy, or pregnancy that would end the life of the woman.
This list is short, i could go on.
Abortion does not only protect the woman, the child is also protected from a mother that doesn't want it. Pro-lifers should be forced to take the children nobody wants.
“Just call it what it is” says the guy using the euphemism “pregnancy termination.”
It’s funny because pro choicers are able to do this because thier side is largely focused on emotion. They can use words like termination or abortion, but we don’t have an equivalent euphemistic word here on the pro life side. That means in this battle, we often have to use logic rather than emotion. Imagine doing that, am I right?
not a euphemism.
a pregancy termination is a pregnancy termination...
Germany is certainly not a shining castle on a hill but at least we have social programs and benefits that help after a child is born, like up to 14months of parental leave which can be taken by mother or father with 65% of your paycheck given to you by the state, 8 weeks of maternity leave after birth etc. This helps families, but whenever i hear news about abortion bans in the USA by republicans, it always sounds like: „You will not abort the baby under any condition and after you have the baby, fuck you what do we care if you can afford it.“ It feels like they are ok if the baby suffers after its born.
Yes and thats why politics are useless because people are stupid
Children are a tax write off so i mean 50/50
I Hope everyone who reads this is having a good day.
Thanks you too! Though I admit I'm not having a spectacular day because as the video touches on baby murder was just legalized in at least one state
I mean, there _are_ equivalent extreme phrasings pro-choicers could use: "women-sacrificers" or "mother-sacrificers".
Evidence shows that criminalising abortion does not decrease the rate at which it happens, it simply forces women towards unsafe options. Additionally, even when there are exceptions in abortion bans, often-times for the legal safety of the doctor, the mother's survival has to be put at risk before those exceptions can be taken. Even further, the age of the mother is regularly not taken into account in these bans, which as we all know has resulted in children under the age of 13 having to relocate to places where there are no such bans to receive the medical treatment that will almost certainly save their life.
The maternal mortality rate in the US has been going up as these evil women-sacrificing fetal fetishists consistently pretend women are baby-making machines rather than people. According to the CDC, the maternal mortality rate in 2019 in the US was 20.1 per 100k. In 2020 it was 23.8 per 100k. In 2021 it was 32.9 per 100k. The evidence indicates that through the 90s it was stable at 12 per 100k, and it's been steadily increasing since the year 2000, but particularly since 2010.
By comparison the maternal mortality rate in Canada is arouind 11 per 100k, across the EU is around 8 per 100k, in Australia it's around 5.6 per 100k.
The US is 2-6 times more likely to kill a mother than most other developed nations, mainly thanks to a lack of affordable healthcare and the restricted access to abortion - both of which come down to these women-sacrificing lunatics.
I think it's the exact opposite from Walsh. I think that stringent views on abortions are the exact reason Republicans have been struggling as much as they have. Besides their general religious dogmatism, there are plenty of issues where they've got some punch, but it doesn't matter because most sane people don't want to despair over possibly ruining their lives once a month when either their period or their partner's period is about to show up. I think that if Republicans stopped dying on the abortion hill, there wouldn't be so many people closer to the center who simply won't vote for a Republican because they know that the abortion ban noose is going to tighten as soon as they have any power.
Ironic how someone who believes that being obedient to God to the point of being willing to sacrifice their own child is virtuous is against child sacrifice. But of course, atrocities are moral if and only if commanded by God.
Oddly the bible he purports to follow specifically says that life starts at first breath and that "children in the womb" actually HAVE no human rights. Just like not being able to use logic they don't do consistency either. His biggest problem is that he can't understand people OTHER than him having any rights and does not get why everyone does not agree with him.
The embryo is always human, even from and before conception, but it's not a _person_. It's personhood that confers rights, not being genetically human.
Not a major thing, just choice of wording
The governor is already overriding it.
Gotta love the right-wing... when votes don't go their way, they just ignore the vote.
This entire abortion debate is honestly little more than a knee-jerk political talking point. It's a non-issue made into a mountain of an issue to rally people based on the appeal to emotion. I've seen the arguments against abortion. It's either pictures of little babies with sweet smiles as if that's what's in the womb at 10 weeks, or something about God and the sanctity of life (which isn't based in the Bible at all since God either kills, or orders the killing of. plenty of babies and pregnant mothers. Plus there's that whole induced miscarriage bit in Numbers).
And that's it. God or "but look at this cute baby you're killing". Try to explain things like diseases or other physical issues that arise in pregnancies that can harm, kill, or give a woman a lifelong disability if an abortion is denied and there are no humanitarian thoughts for her. Ask about support for women denied abortions to care for their newborns and that sort of "free handout by the government" is just laughed at. Human rights and the welfare of life are only for the fetus and stops at birth, apparently.
::::steps off soapbox::::
👏👏👏👏👏
Matt Walsh is why I'm pro-choice
Professor Stick is why I'm pro life
I live in a super religious area, I think I like the term, Child Sacrifice. I'mma start using it just to see the reactions I get lol
Well most likely the reactions you will get is people desperately trying to climb that the clump of cells isn't a person, that sort of rhetoric. Because they have to try to dehumanize the baby in order to even try justifying what they are pushing for
@@RDeathmark You mean people telling the truth?
How is it possible that you STILL can't understand that the majority of the USA isn't buying your bullshit when every time it has come up for a vote (7 out of 7 so far, with more to come) you forced birthers and your agenda has been shot down by We The People?
@@RDeathmark
Is a lump of non-sentient cells a person?
@@Diviance that depends on the cells doesn't it? If it's the ones that make up a fetus then yes. But no that's all right I understand. I would try to dehumanize the babies as well because that would be the only way I could sleep at night supporting this
@@RDeathmark
"that depends on the cells doesn't it? If it's the ones that make up a fetus then yes. But no that's all right I understand."
*So, **_all_** non-sentient fetuses you consider a person?*
"I would try to dehumanize the babies as well because that would be the only way I could sleep at night supporting this"
*Nobody is dehumanizing things. Putting words in other people's mouths sure seems to be a tactic you right-wings love, though.*
*Personhood is not the same thing as being human. A brain-dead body, for example, being kept alive with machines is no longer a person. A non-sentient fetus is not a person. A corpse is not a person.*
*They are all human... but they are not persons.*
*This is not rocket science. And I have no trouble sleeping while fully supporting abortion. In fact, I don't know how you can sleep at night while defending turning women back into property.*