Bioenergetics Explained! (Glycolysis, Krebs Cycle, Oxidative Phosphorylation)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 132

  • @TheMovementSystem
    @TheMovementSystem  2 роки тому +4

    If you're studying for the CSCS Exam, make sure to join my study group: facebook.com/groups/2415992685342170

    • @dcdelacruise
      @dcdelacruise 5 місяців тому

      what about if i am studying for a physical instructor course exam? what would your suggestions be on me researching more?

  • @lindaw4534
    @lindaw4534 3 роки тому +45

    This is by far the most efficient and simple explanation I've seen on bioenergetics related to the NASM program. Thank you so much, I'm currently cramming for my exam in one month!

    • @mathematics5573
      @mathematics5573 2 роки тому +2

      Robot Kittyyy! Except his Krebs cycle diagram, is wrong! He is too over simplifiying it and it is wrong.

    • @jono1457-qd9ft
      @jono1457-qd9ft 27 днів тому

      Also the ATP counts are wrong. ATP net from glycolysis is closer to 3 because it's mostly from muscle glycogen not blood glucose. Everyone gets this wrong.
      And the net ATP from mitochondrial respiration is around 30 ATP not 34

  • @Richacha.-.p
    @Richacha.-.p Рік тому +1

    THIS IS LITERALLY SO HELPFUL, its the best way of explaining everything in detail but also in a short way

  • @edwardofrias8220
    @edwardofrias8220 3 роки тому +5

    WOW! I feel like a boss right now. This material can be overwhelming, yet this breakdown has allowed me to see the light. You have shown me the way like David Goggins has. I wish you exponential success!! I appreciate you!!

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 роки тому +2

      Wow I’m going to call myself the David Goggins of bioenergetics now

  • @omeirbabi
    @omeirbabi 4 роки тому +23

    I am gonna take CSCS exam next month, i must tell you i was having a hard time getting clarity about glycolysis but your explanation nailed it ! Thank you for sharing it. God bless you bro 👍

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 роки тому +1

      Glad it helped! Make sure you join the Facebook group: facebook.com/groups/2415992685342170/

    • @omeirbabi
      @omeirbabi 4 роки тому

      I already did that moment !

  • @elliewilliams9015
    @elliewilliams9015 3 роки тому +5

    This was explained so well and was much easier to understand than my lecturer's powerpoint. Thank you so much!!

  • @tishazabin3974
    @tishazabin3974 2 роки тому +2

    The way you explained the whole process is just amazing. I was struggling so much. Thank you! 💕

  • @khadijahanum8875
    @khadijahanum8875 23 години тому

    I WAS STUCK N REALLY NEVER STUDDIEDD AND UNDERSTOOD THIS CONCEPT EVERRR BUT THANKS TO YOUU. SOOO GOOD

  • @jefflamb2301
    @jefflamb2301 3 роки тому +17

    Man, Im doing my PT cert right now and wow.. thank you so much for being able to lay all this out. The text I have is really hard to digest compared to your explanation. Really man, thanks.

    • @Serenityi413
      @Serenityi413 3 роки тому

      I'm doing mine right now, this was good.

  • @melissadrake4339
    @melissadrake4339 4 роки тому +11

    I'm going through nasm for my cpt. I just now started learning this stuff and was soooo confused! This helps me out so much! Thank you!

  • @frajill4397
    @frajill4397 4 роки тому +2

    I MISS THE NORMAL DAYS. I DON'T LIKE DOING DISCUSSIONS ONLINE, BUT WATCHING YOUR VIDEOS MOTIVATES ME.

  • @ayushibandyopadhyay1766
    @ayushibandyopadhyay1766 4 роки тому +2

    Have my University entrance exam in two days... No one has taught Kreb's cycle this smoothly ever to me.. This video was really useful.. Thank you 🙏

  • @von-marieoliva4827
    @von-marieoliva4827 4 роки тому +4

    This completely simplified the topic for me! Thank you for sharing!

  • @alyssayoung.2494
    @alyssayoung.2494 3 роки тому +1

    1st year med student here, this video is GREAT!!!!!!!!!!

  • @mikelowrey1172
    @mikelowrey1172 3 роки тому +1

    a better teacher than my professor!

  • @houmous942
    @houmous942 3 роки тому +35

    Nice video overall, but there’s a mistake. When pyruvate is decarboxylated into acetylCoA, there is no O2 coming in to bind to C and form CO2. The CO2, i.e. COO, is simply the carboxylic function (COOH) that came from the pyruvate. However you didn’t mention the CoA that comes in at that step to form acetylCoA. O2 only comes into play at the end of the electron transport chain.

    • @Maani430
      @Maani430 8 місяців тому

      Thank you

    • @LifewithAmairanny
      @LifewithAmairanny Місяць тому

      ugh now im scared to watch the video if its wrong

  • @sarahtakash1
    @sarahtakash1 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for this! You're really helping me with my NSCA studying!

  • @thephysioscarerapist
    @thephysioscarerapist Рік тому

    Thanks for this... I understand this completely now

  • @laddo666
    @laddo666 5 днів тому

    Great video. I love how you explained it. I subscribed. Thanks.

  • @kcrehkopf
    @kcrehkopf 9 місяців тому

    om gosh you are so helpful--great concise explanation--plus super easy on the eyes

  • @21Bommi1
    @21Bommi1 4 роки тому +1

    Very much useful. Explanation and providing attention by deeply pronouncing few terms was really good 👍 Thank you

  • @doraorban3598
    @doraorban3598 Рік тому

    You're a very good teacher!

  • @rene7391
    @rene7391 2 роки тому

    Wonderful simplified explanation 👏 thanks

  • @Gar136
    @Gar136 4 роки тому +1

    Hey Matt!! I’m currently studying for Nasm-cpt certification and this video helped me out a lot thank you!

  • @tevii_mahnmegao6145
    @tevii_mahnmegao6145 Рік тому

    THAT REALLY HELPED ME. WOW, GREAT JOB.

  • @arielmejia4743
    @arielmejia4743 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much for the great explanation/breakdown! ✨

  • @mjwinterbottom9131
    @mjwinterbottom9131 3 роки тому +1

    You made this super easy! Thank you so much! :D

  • @Serenityi413
    @Serenityi413 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much! Simply put!

  • @lissetealopezmunguia250
    @lissetealopezmunguia250 2 роки тому +1

    Very well explained! Thanks!

  • @kyarrajackson5207
    @kyarrajackson5207 2 роки тому

    This was the best explanation!

  • @Coach_ahmedflefl
    @Coach_ahmedflefl 4 роки тому +1

    Easy demonstration. Thank you

  • @jeremyarguellesbullfrogend624
    @jeremyarguellesbullfrogend624 4 роки тому +1

    THANKS MAN! I really like this. Very helpful

  • @harsimarsingh3514
    @harsimarsingh3514 2 роки тому

    Helping me as always. Thanks alot

  • @1ukasvn
    @1ukasvn 4 роки тому +1

    thanks so much for the clear explanation, you just got a new subscriber! your videos are cool !

  • @harshdinodiya8509
    @harshdinodiya8509 4 роки тому +1

    Very nice its so easy now .. thanks

  • @nawannabaz3092
    @nawannabaz3092 3 роки тому +1

    That was fantastic man 👌

  • @pjcarfagno6412
    @pjcarfagno6412 4 роки тому

    very helpful and easy to follow

  • @namulindwavictoria7213
    @namulindwavictoria7213 3 роки тому

    Wow, thanks so much. Well explained

  • @nataliea149
    @nataliea149 4 роки тому +1

    Hey Matt! Are you a wizard? Just watched your vids lately and I was thinking to myself "maybe you should ask him to make a bioenergetics vid". lol thank you so much! :)

  • @mcvheartsjdb
    @mcvheartsjdb 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you! This was awesome.

  • @paiger9559
    @paiger9559 4 роки тому +1

    So helpful! Thanks!

  • @lenajajo2168
    @lenajajo2168 3 роки тому +2

    can you please explain why you are multipling the 10 nadh by three ? and 2 fadhd by 2 ?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  3 роки тому +3

      When those substrates are oxidized in oxidative phosphorylation that’s how many ATP they produce

  • @questionme9327
    @questionme9327 3 роки тому

    form 4:30 onwards i just became completely lost. I dont understand the NADH bit and how it correlates to the krebs cycle. And the atp part, 2 extras form glycolysis amd the timsing by 3 to make 30 atp doesnt make sense to me either. Can someone recommems a video to help break this part down. tyy :)

    • @questionme9327
      @questionme9327 3 роки тому +1

      just watched ur other video breaking it down and i understand it a bit better now thankyou :D

  • @abubzk
    @abubzk 3 роки тому +1

    thanks

  • @TheYogiworld
    @TheYogiworld 3 роки тому +1

    Very nice...👌

  • @ashiqamhmd2107
    @ashiqamhmd2107 10 місяців тому

    the best explanation vedio i have ever seen...thankyou so much sirr🫠🫠🫠❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

  • @gavhlev2853
    @gavhlev2853 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome!

  • @runjoshrun7237
    @runjoshrun7237 5 місяців тому

    Do questions on something like this require absolute recall of all these molecules and complete process or just being familiar with it at a higher level?

  • @KitchenwithAdeela321
    @KitchenwithAdeela321 Рік тому

    Thanks for sharing

  • @tedmed7349
    @tedmed7349 7 місяців тому

    Can't see the forest for the trees are blocking my sight. So what is good or bad and what should we do about it.

  • @Inyakopon
    @Inyakopon 4 місяці тому

    Thanks sensei

  • @eldiego5101
    @eldiego5101 Рік тому

    Good topic exlanation

  • @kitsono8745
    @kitsono8745 2 роки тому

    Isn't the first part of the Krebs cycle known as the Links reaction ? Thank you for your explanation!!! it was super helpful

  • @strokesfield
    @strokesfield 2 роки тому

    I'm confused. My textbook says that a net yield of 32 ATP is given "from energy transfer during the complete oxidation of one glucose molecule in glycolysis, the citric acid cycle, and electron transport."
    What am I missing here?

  • @aquakatrin1332
    @aquakatrin1332 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you ❤️

  • @johntruong4227
    @johntruong4227 3 роки тому

    THANK YOU!!!!

  • @saahilshaik9024
    @saahilshaik9024 2 роки тому +1

    im a little bit confused. you said that glycolysis doesn't need oxygen. but you wrote above the diagram "aerobic glycolysis" and said that if you didn't have oxygen, you would get lactate.

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  2 роки тому

      Yes. The process of glycolysis is occurring in the cytoplasm without oxygen. It's what happens after glycolysis that determines if it's aerobic or anaerobic. So if after glycolysis is done there is room in the mitochondria for the pyruvate to be metabolized the process is considered aerobic glycolysis and the pyruvate moves onto the Krebs cycle. If there is not oxygen in the mitochondria then the pyruvate will turn into lactate. That is termed anaerobic glycolysis. The terminology is confusing because in both cases the process of glycolysis didn't require oxygen.

  • @guchi8884
    @guchi8884 3 роки тому +1

    Is the electron chain transport a part of this?

  • @heavenlybreeze
    @heavenlybreeze 3 роки тому

    Bro! You're goood!

  • @varunjirali9272
    @varunjirali9272 4 роки тому +1

    Can u explain me about what happens if there are more pfk..?

  • @johndemwell6022
    @johndemwell6022 3 роки тому

    How many ATP does aerobic and anaerobic respiration produce?

  • @Goldo1968
    @Goldo1968 2 роки тому +1

    Same for lypolisis pls?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  2 роки тому

      Here’s my video lipolysis vs. beta oxidation: m.ua-cam.com/video/0EUslLbIkXo/v-deo.html&feature=emb_logo

  • @-KARMA482
    @-KARMA482 2 роки тому

    i dont see where the 4 NADHs are in the end of the krebs cycle

  • @leytonpyett3572
    @leytonpyett3572 3 роки тому

    So you get 2 NADH from aerobic glycolsis. 2 NADH x 3 = 6 ATP. If it costs 2 then shouldn't the NET be 4?

  • @madisonhagen7133
    @madisonhagen7133 4 роки тому +1

    did you mean to say anaerobic glycolysis instead of aerobic glycolysis (because you said the aerobic glycolysis doesn't need O2 but the definition of aerobic says it requires O2 and anaerobic doesn't require O2???

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 роки тому +1

      Neither require oxygen actually. These are both done in the cytoplasm without oxygen. Aerobic glycolysis just indicates that once split, the pyruvate will continue on to the mitochondria and use oxygen to break down more in the Krebs cycle. Anaerobic indicates that the pyruvate will turn into lactate.

    • @madisonhagen7133
      @madisonhagen7133 4 роки тому +1

      @@TheMovementSystem Thank you so much for the explanation. That makes so much more sense now!

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 роки тому

      @@madisonhagen7133 You're welcome!

  • @harrisonsmith8616
    @harrisonsmith8616 2 роки тому

    Very useful video, but everywhere I look it shows that only 32 ATP comes from 1 glucose.

  • @truth6565
    @truth6565 4 роки тому

    Hey man, just want you to know
    THIS WAS A GOOD VIDEO
    Probably can always get better but this was very good and I’m here totally randomly and a huge critic lol
    In case it helps to know; I Randomly found this searching up “bio energy” which is some jokey new age health nut shit I watched “Philion” make fun of

  • @xSOMETIMEZxUNITEDx
    @xSOMETIMEZxUNITEDx 3 роки тому

    Anyone want to check my work?
    For a 16 chain fatty acid you will make 129ATP.
    Is that correct?

  • @mathematics5573
    @mathematics5573 2 роки тому

    if I was marking an exam on the Krebs cycle, he had done, if he had written this, I would fail him.

  • @lovethememory
    @lovethememory 3 роки тому +1

    👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

  • @strongbodystrongmiind
    @strongbodystrongmiind 4 роки тому

    how is 4x2 equaling 10?? Am i misinterpreting a step or something?

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 роки тому

      What part of the video are you referring to?

    • @strongbodystrongmiind
      @strongbodystrongmiind 4 роки тому

      The Movement System the end where you multiple 4 by 2 for ATP

    • @TheMovementSystem
      @TheMovementSystem  4 роки тому

      @@strongbodystrongmiind I'm still not sure what you mean. It's 34 from Oxidative phosphorylation + 2 from Glycolysis + 2 from Krebs cycle = 38

    • @strongbodystrongmiind
      @strongbodystrongmiind 4 роки тому

      The Movement System ok you have
      4NADH x 2 = 10....

    • @strongbodystrongmiind
      @strongbodystrongmiind 4 роки тому

      The Movement System ahhhhh never mind.... u explained it at 5:28 mark :))

  • @davidlandy4514
    @davidlandy4514 2 роки тому +1

    isnt there 2.5 ATP per NADH not 3?

  • @caesarerelmacahilig2611
    @caesarerelmacahilig2611 3 роки тому +1

    Elliott Hulse brought me here

  • @MichaelTurany-p9x
    @MichaelTurany-p9x 25 днів тому

    So basically what you're saying The chalice with the palace holds the brew that is true ua-cam.com/video/TJ9f2rnjB84/v-deo.htmlsi=NUn54b3lCOkCu6r0

  • @mathematics5573
    @mathematics5573 2 роки тому +1

    Except his Krebs cycle diagram, is wrong! He is too over simplifiying it and it is wrong.

    • @Akash-ep8yx
      @Akash-ep8yx 10 місяців тому

      He is explaining bioenergetics , not creb cycle

  • @slimboicardy
    @slimboicardy 2 роки тому

    ang hirap

  • @slimboicardy
    @slimboicardy 2 роки тому

    pinagsasabi neto