@@nessasnursingdiaries5018 Mann, sadly I don’t think so but these institutions just allow professors to waste time instead of getting to the point clearly
I have just begun learning psychology formally and these words are completely unfamiliar and confusing for me. But by watching this video, i could really grasp the concept clearly! Nicely done,very informative.. thank you so much sir!
Young teacher, brevity and clarity are ur hallmarks. Cannot be better explained. Thanks a lot...I too am a novice at psychology and had been struggling to get things into me. But u opened up a whole new dimension to learning and understanding! Well done sir..
I have been stuck with this since day 1 of my class and your explanation is the only one that I actually understand. I was starting to think that I was too dumb to not get it after watching several crash courses. Thank you so much
Hi Sanaa, William James referred to Darwin's work regularly in his writing on a number of topics. In general, functionalism was about understanding the purpose for particular traits and evolutionary theory provided an explanation for how those purposeful traits would have been selected for over time.
You're correct that Titchener played an important role in formalizing structuralism and developing techniques for introspection. This was based on his work with Wundt, his translations of Wundt's works, as well as his own research at Cornell.
Thank you for the thorough explanation of this. I read my History and Systems book and it just did not make sense to me. I get it now! Thank you again.
thank you for this video! it helped me so much. i was having a lot of difficulty understanding both for the past week and your explanation was perfectly clear and understandable:)
Functionalism: The principle that form follows function (as in evolutionary psychology) rather than function following form (as in learning theory, affective neuroscience), thus arriving at principles that are formal but not functional, and psychological principles that are true to form, dysfunctional. from Dr. Mezmer’s Dictionary of Bad Psychology
Hey love your channel!!... do you have any videos on behaviorism and John B Watson or B.F Skinner and or any videos on psychoanalysis and Sigmund Freud
Glad to hear that! You can find a full playlist on learning theory and behaviorism here: ua-cam.com/play/PLkKvotUGCyLdWmS-YBp58DTmjN3Q9nih0.html as well as several videos about Freud at the start of this playlist on personality: ua-cam.com/play/PLkKvotUGCyLe8owpX2t0RMSbOEzCoY7hG.html
Hi Michael. Is there a recommendation you could give me to read about the development of these approaches throughout the 20th century? Thanks for the summary!
A pretty long question here, how is asking the participants to describe an experience when exposed to a stimulus through introspection correlated to "breaking the consciousness down into manageable parts to analyze"? What are the "parts" here? Would anymore care to enlighten please?
hello, i asked my psych professor and he said that wilhelm wundut basically wanted to break down and analyse different parts of the brain as to how chemists break down elements and understand the chemical compounds which relates to the approach of structuralism. i hope this helps:)
Sure, another way you could think of the difference between structuralism and functionalism would be to think about an emotion like fear. A structuralist approach would focus more on the elements of the mind that are involved in the experience of fear, while a functionalist approach would focus more on how fear serves a purpose by having an effect on behavior.
@@PsychExamReview Boom. It just clicked for me with that example. Really hating this current course. It feels like they were seriously overthinking back then. 😂. Thank you!
Hi, I didn't describe these approaches in this unit because they are each addressed in more detail in future units. Here's a few related videos that might be helpful for understanding each of these approaches: Gestalt: ua-cam.com/video/lqque_JJRMo/v-deo.html Behaviorism: ua-cam.com/video/E6Qs0Az2au4/v-deo.html Psychoanalytic & Psychodynamic: ua-cam.com/video/tRDUlxc6VDw/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/GrjJyvNpQ3I/v-deo.html Humanistic: ua-cam.com/video/K3-VC-VH45A/v-deo.html I hope this helps!
Great question! I think that learning about these early approaches can serve two purposes beyond just being historical trivia. The first is that they can show us which approaches didn't quite work as well as planned and we can better understand why these needed to be modified (this should also help keep us humble, as we can clearly see how even brilliant minds of the past have erred). The second is that we can see how things that did work have been adopted and incorporated into modern approaches and this can help us to better understand these approaches and where they came from.
The problem with structuralism wasn't that it was too subjective, on the contrary; it was too objective. Wilhelm Wundt tried to quantify behavior into physiological patterns
This is a good point and it's true that Wundt wanted to make psychology more scientific and objective. Perhaps the larger problem was trying to make the leap from studies of things like reaction time and visual perception to understanding consciousness.
I don't think Freud fits into either category particularly well. In some ways his approach to identifying parts of the conscious/unconscious mind could be seen as similar to a structuralist approach, though his emphasis on resulting behavioral effects and explaining why symptoms were occurring and how they could be treated (even if incorrect) could be seen as a bit more pragmatic/functionalist.
Fuck yeah~~~ that was my reaction to experiencing this video, your content, the way you explain things and write them down after explaining the key concepts is invaluable!!! It is truly helpful :) Thank you.
Wilhelm Wundt wasn't a structuralist tho, He openly denied reduction and atomism. Also a different common misconception you mention about him was that the used introspection often. It was a small part of his research, he rarely used it in fact. Titchener a seperate psychologist said he learned introspection from Wundt and was a structuralist is the reason for this misconception. READ INTO IT
You're correct that Edward Titchener was a greater advocate of a structuralist approach and also used introspection to a greater degree in trying to identify elements of consciousness so I should have mentioned him in this video. He also brought Wundt's ideas to the US and translated his early work, though perhaps in a way that was more in line with Titchener's own views. I'd also add that both Wundt and Titchener were critical of "naive introspection" and believed that subjects needed training in order to be able to provide useful introspective reports, which I also could have clarified a bit here. Thanks for commenting!
You're right that things are actually a little more complicated. Titchener translated a lot of Wundt's work and brought it to the US and this may have led to Wundt being seen as more of a structuralist than he actually was. Thanks for commenting!
truly amazing how you explained 2 views on psychology I have been struggling with for days in less than 4 minutes, thanks! :-D
No problem, glad to hear that it was helpful!
Yo fr, I’m about to do a pop quiz and he summed this up better than many professors💪🏽💯🙏🏽🔥thanks!
@@clarenceoliveriii is this acceptable knowledge at university level
@@nessasnursingdiaries5018 Mann, sadly I don’t think so but these institutions just allow professors to waste time instead of getting to the point clearly
Understandable and useful for freshman student like me taking up BA Psychology. Thank you. Keep uploading.
Glad it's useful, best of luck in your studies and let me know if you have any questions!
I have just begun learning psychology formally and these words are completely unfamiliar and confusing for me. But by watching this video, i could really grasp the concept clearly! Nicely done,very informative.. thank you so much sir!
You're welcome, glad it was helpful!
took my prof 20 slides to explain this and this vid took 3 mins with better explanation :))
Glad it was helpful!
Mahalo for simplifying thesis two terms for me. I feel much more confident going to take my quiz today.
You're welcome, good luck on your quiz!
Young teacher, brevity and clarity are ur hallmarks. Cannot be better explained. Thanks a lot...I too am a novice at psychology and had been struggling to get things into me. But u opened up a whole new dimension to learning and understanding! Well done sir..
Glad to hear that, hope you keep learning and improving!
I have been stuck with this since day 1 of my class and your explanation is the only one that I actually understand. I was starting to think that I was too dumb to not get it after watching several crash courses. Thank you so much
You're welcome!
I'm in the same boat, but a year after you!! I've a notebook full of terms that I need definitions of and I'm only on module one!!!
Came for the linguistics (the Skinner and Chomsky vid) and stayed for the psychology, perception, etc. You're an excellent presenter.
Thanks!
The way you explain it is really fantastic.....Thank you so much......
How did Darwin's theory influenced William in specific and functionalism in general?
Hi Sanaa, William James referred to Darwin's work regularly in his writing on a number of topics. In general, functionalism was about understanding the purpose for particular traits and evolutionary theory provided an explanation for how those purposeful traits would have been selected for over time.
+PsychExamReview Thank you
you're explaining in a great way ! I actually understand this now. Thank you!
You're welcome!
Structuralism I believe was established by Edward Titchner. Wilhelm Wundt established the first formal lab for research in Psychology.
You're correct that Titchener played an important role in formalizing structuralism and developing techniques for introspection. This was based on his work with Wundt, his translations of Wundt's works, as well as his own research at Cornell.
Please Upload a video on extra sensory perception (esp)
wow you just made my presentation perfect! Because now i understand!
Thank you for the thorough explanation of this. I read my History and Systems book and it just did not make sense to me. I get it now! Thank you again.
You're welcome!
Your explanation was soooo good, sir. Better than the wall of text crap I read everywhere and i could not understand. God I love you
Glad it was helpful!
thank you for this video! it helped me so much. i was having a lot of difficulty understanding both for the past week and your explanation was perfectly clear and understandable:)
Glad to hear it was helpful for you!
thank you this helped me
Glad to hear that
What was the criticism on the structuralism and functionalism.
this just saved me honestly thank u so much
You're welcome!
Functionalism: The principle that form follows function (as in evolutionary psychology) rather than function following form (as in learning theory, affective neuroscience), thus arriving at principles that are formal but not functional, and psychological principles that are true to form, dysfunctional.
from Dr. Mezmer’s Dictionary of Bad Psychology
Hey love your channel!!... do you have any videos on behaviorism and John B Watson or B.F Skinner and or any videos on psychoanalysis and Sigmund Freud
Glad to hear that!
You can find a full playlist on learning theory and behaviorism here: ua-cam.com/play/PLkKvotUGCyLdWmS-YBp58DTmjN3Q9nih0.html
as well as several videos about Freud at the start of this playlist on personality: ua-cam.com/play/PLkKvotUGCyLe8owpX2t0RMSbOEzCoY7hG.html
Hi Michael. Is there a recommendation you could give me to read about the development of these approaches throughout the 20th century? Thanks for the summary!
Sure, this excellent resource site has a number of original papers organized by topic if you want to read more: psychclassics.yorku.ca/topic.htm
@@PsychExamReview Thanks Michael!
Mr.Michael Corayer teaches you how to be a good teacher *-*
You are really doing great work!
Thanks!
A pretty long question here, how is asking the participants to describe an experience when exposed to a stimulus through introspection correlated to "breaking the consciousness down into manageable parts to analyze"? What are the "parts" here? Would anymore care to enlighten please?
hello, i asked my psych professor and he said that wilhelm wundut basically wanted to break down and analyse different parts of the brain as to how chemists break down elements and understand the chemical compounds which relates to the approach of structuralism. i hope this helps:)
will u pl. Explain with one more example
Sure, another way you could think of the difference between structuralism and functionalism would be to think about an emotion like fear. A structuralist approach would focus more on the elements of the mind that are involved in the experience of fear, while a functionalist approach would focus more on how fear serves a purpose by having an effect on behavior.
@@PsychExamReview thanks
@@PsychExamReview
Boom. It just clicked for me with that example. Really hating this current course. It feels like they were seriously overthinking back then. 😂. Thank you!
@@terrielovingood4852 You're welcome!
Add on to this video about Gestalt, Behavioural, Psychodynamic and Humanistic approaches.
Hi, I didn't describe these approaches in this unit because they are each addressed in more detail in future units. Here's a few related videos that might be helpful for understanding each of these approaches:
Gestalt: ua-cam.com/video/lqque_JJRMo/v-deo.html
Behaviorism: ua-cam.com/video/E6Qs0Az2au4/v-deo.html
Psychoanalytic & Psychodynamic: ua-cam.com/video/tRDUlxc6VDw/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/GrjJyvNpQ3I/v-deo.html
Humanistic: ua-cam.com/video/K3-VC-VH45A/v-deo.html
I hope this helps!
If structuralism and functionalism have since faded, why are they still relevant to psychology today?
Great question! I think that learning about these early approaches can serve two purposes beyond just being historical trivia. The first is that they can show us which approaches didn't quite work as well as planned and we can better understand why these needed to be modified (this should also help keep us humble, as we can clearly see how even brilliant minds of the past have erred). The second is that we can see how things that did work have been adopted and incorporated into modern approaches and this can help us to better understand these approaches and where they came from.
@@PsychExamReview Thank you!
@@matthewrichey2727 You're welcome!
What is the structure of the mind? what are the components of the mind?
The problem with structuralism wasn't that it was too subjective, on the contrary; it was too objective. Wilhelm Wundt tried to quantify behavior into physiological patterns
This is a good point and it's true that Wundt wanted to make psychology more scientific and objective. Perhaps the larger problem was trying to make the leap from studies of things like reaction time and visual perception to understanding consciousness.
hey can you elaborate on this, i quite do not understand what you have just said. thank you :)
thank you sir for the good explanation, i very appreciate your video
You're welcome!
well explained
Describe functionalism and structuralism and their influences on behaviorism and cognitive psychology. help out
You are a LIFESAVER! thank you so much!
You're welcome!
was freud a structuralist or a functionalist?
I don't think Freud fits into either category particularly well. In some ways his approach to identifying parts of the conscious/unconscious mind could be seen as similar to a structuralist approach, though his emphasis on resulting behavioral effects and explaining why symptoms were occurring and how they could be treated (even if incorrect) could be seen as a bit more pragmatic/functionalist.
thank you for this!
Thank you it was helpful
Amazing
Fuck yeah~~~ that was my reaction to experiencing this video, your content, the way you explain things and write them down after explaining the key concepts is invaluable!!! It is truly helpful :) Thank you.
You're welcome!
if i pass my exam i'll say it's because of u
The credit will be yours for putting in the time studying, best of luck!
@@PsychExamReview update: i passed ! Needed 50% to pass and I diiiiddddd !! :) thank you very much ✨
@@mariebryche7832 That's great, congratulations!
Wilhelm Wundt wasn't a structuralist tho, He openly denied reduction and atomism. Also a different common misconception you mention about him was that the used introspection often. It was a small part of his research, he rarely used it in fact.
Titchener a seperate psychologist said he learned introspection from Wundt and was a structuralist is the reason for this misconception. READ INTO IT
You're correct that Edward Titchener was a greater advocate of a structuralist approach and also used introspection to a greater degree in trying to identify elements of consciousness so I should have mentioned him in this video. He also brought Wundt's ideas to the US and translated his early work, though perhaps in a way that was more in line with Titchener's own views. I'd also add that both Wundt and Titchener were critical of "naive introspection" and believed that subjects needed training in order to be able to provide useful introspective reports, which I also could have clarified a bit here. Thanks for commenting!
Hello! May I have a copy of the reading you've mentioned? I'm interested to know more about that. Thank you!
@@nadrey22 A Conceptual History of Psychology after John D. Greenwood
@@GummBo3 thank you!
Thankyou sir!!
You're welcome!
Thank u sir 👍
You're welcome!
Thank you!
You're welcome!
This is So helpful thankkk U a bunch U saved My life!!
You're welcome!
That’s perfect ❤️
Wundt was not a structuralist.His student Tichener was
You're right that things are actually a little more complicated. Titchener translated a lot of Wundt's work and brought it to the US and this may have led to Wundt being seen as more of a structuralist than he actually was. Thanks for commenting!
It's Williams James
This is truly so helpful, you explained them both so clearly
Glad to hear that, thanks for commenting!
OMG this helped me a lot thank youu
seninle şu konuların üzerinden bir geçelim tatlı çocuk.
No disrespect but you look like an off brand Ben Barnes. God bless for saving my ass.
Haha, glad I can help!
you are sweet i understand everything
Chur my bro
thank you!
You're welcome!