QUICK NOTE - typo on the timeline at the end (it should say Wilhelm Wundt 1879 as stated earlier in the video, NOT 1897)! Check out the video on COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY here: ua-cam.com/video/NQSU6tAqvOA/v-deo.html More Psychology resources here: www.bearitinmind.org
@@roarwoof8816 Good question - the timeline is just trying to give you an overview of the progression of psychology as a science. The psychodynamic and humanistic approaches are non-scientific and are therefore not applicable. SLT overlaps with Behaviourism as both classed as Learning theories and adopt scientific methodology. Hope that helps :)
my psychology teacher shows us some of your videos in our lessons sometimes, and i honestly understand the content more from you than from my teacher lol... thank you for the high quality videos they really help me with my revision!
I realize this was posted a few years ago, but I just want to say that I am incredibly thankful for your videos. I have my first Psych test today, and out of all the videos I’ve watched that cover the first chapter of my textbook, this video has clarified it the best for me. The concept check questions are also very helpful! I’m actually feeling pretty confident about my test now, thanks again!! 😊😊
Delighted the video has been helpful for you 😊All the best with your upcoming test 👍Hope you enjoy and benefit from many of the other videos on the channel.
honestly I probably would dread revising psychology more than leg day if this channel didn't exist, you are responsible for my grades solely and thank you for the time and effort you put into making these incredible videos, please make them on every topic 🙏
Wow, thank you! Really appreciate you taking the time to write such a great comment😊 More videos on the way, and something new on the website coming soon so look out for that in December/New Year.
This channel is highly addictive. Videos are very much informative and engaging. Its like watching a movie ... Thankyou for such a quality content... You are a true teacher..❤
So glad I found your channel!! I'm doing a level psychology at the moment (just started) and you will help me so much when I end up sitting my a level exams! Amazing channel, keep it up!:))
Cheers 😊 Welcome to psychology! Hope you really enjoy the course, and even more so, exploring psychology beyond it. Thanks for your kind and encouraging words about the channel 👍Hope you continue to benefit from the videos!
Thanks Aaron 😀 Really appreciate your comment. You sound like you have a real interest in psychology. Even though Wundt isn't on the advanced information, (so you shouldn't get asked a direct question about it), you could still use some of this material on Wundt in relation to evaluation in a Behaviourist essay (i.e. Behaviourism moved away from the subjectivity of introspection and argued that psychology should study directly observable and measurable behaviour - as such it helped psychology gain credibility as a science 👍
I know exactly what you mean Alex! I know from teaching it for many years that this isn't the easiest part to get your head round. Although here's a little tip - even thought this isn't on the advanced information, (so you shouldn't get asked a direct question about it), you could still use some of this material on Wundt in relation to evaluation in a Behaviourist essay (i.e. Behaviourism moved away from the subjectivity of introspection and argued that psychology should study directly observable and measurable behaviour - as such it helped psychology gain credibility as a science 👍 All the best with this summers exams!
Hey mate another great video 👍. I'm sure you probably started working on this vid before the advance information came out. But is there any chance the next few videos be focused around the spec points we need to know for this years exam?
Cheers Tom 😀 Behaviourism video dropping shortly, with others to follow. Although here's a little tip - even though this isn't on the advanced information, (so you shouldn't get asked a direct question about it), you could still use some of this material on Wundt in relation to evaluation in a Behaviourist essay (i.e. Behaviourism moved away from the subjectivity of introspection and argued that psychology should study directly observable and measurable behaviour - as such it helped psychology gain credibility as a science) 👍
Introspection is still something we rely on everyday. For example, when we trust eyewitness accounts. We take it for granted that subjectivity has sub-par truth value, but clearly we're not consistent in applying this belief So, given someone is not intentionally lying to you, why exactly might a subjective account be worse? Are there more cases than the one I mentioned in which it isn't?
Thanks for your thoughts, and agree with you that subjectivity certainly has value. I think the point made by others about the issue with subjectivity relates to the scientific process. The scientific process requires measurements and data to be as objective as possible because this way they can be checked and verified. If I'm understanding your example correctly, with eyewitness testimony, one eye witness to a crime is often not strong evidence because whilst it is subjective (and not necessarily any less true) scientists stress the need to verify and check that what they said is true. In other words, how would we know whether they are lying or not? Or giving socially desirable answers? However, it TWO independent eyewitnesses report the same thing, then this helps to verify what they said - we can check the reliability of their reports. In Wundt's case it is relying on the individual to report what was going on in their mind - but how do we know if this is true? How do we know that they even know what is going on in their head? There are many cases where eyewitnesses to crimes have reported what they saw honestly and truthfully as they understood it - but it turned out they actually completely wrong in their descriptions of what happened! Subjective reports - but they need verifying. Like I said, I hope I've understood where you were coming from and what I've said above makes sense - let me know if not, and also if you have more thoughts on the matter that I haven't thought about 👍
@@BearitinMIND thanks for the links. I noticed, however, that there's no link for the "top 5 mental disorders". If you have time, I was hoping to see your recs for that. Also the affiliate links takes the user to amazon uk. I'm based in the US; if you have affiliate links for Amazon US, then i can make the purchases through that. def want to support you and your work.
Wow - thank you for such a kind and generous comment in so many ways :) Firstly - hopefully now the website has updated and you will now be able to access the article to the mental disorder book recommendations. Secondly - hopefully when you click any of the Amazon links it takes you to the USA Amazon page - PLEASE do let me know if that hasn't worked. Would greatly appreciate the feedback! Thirdly - thank you again for your generosity and kindness in wanting to support the work of this channel - it is very much appreciated and wonderfully encouraging. Can I ask what your area of interest is in psychology (student/teacher/high school/college etc?), and are there any areas of psychology/video ideas that you would like to see?
Indeed, Wundt´s introspection is not statistic-friendly, because the act of therapeutic reflection is a way of self development and self-psychotherapy. Putting that practice into the lab doesnt make any real sense. It is highly subjective and relative because all human beings are like that, and thats why psychotherapy is also an artform full of subleties in language and relationship between the patient and the therapist, no matter what the school of thinking.
Andres - thanks for the comment, and your further analysis from a statistical basis alongside psychotherapy. Always interesting to consider the tension between psychology's efforts to be scientific and in the subjective, idiographic applications in such therapies.
@@BearitinMIND I personally cant consider psychotherapy a statistical science at all. Social Psychology and similar ones can benefit from those efforts, but human beings are subjective in nature. I can consider psychotherapy as powerful artistic science that finds results in the liveness of the session. Who cares if ABC is 50% better than BDE? That doesnt say anything truly relevant. Psychotherapy teaches us that knowledge is great, but it is nothing without human connection, empathy and professional compassion
QUICK NOTE - typo on the timeline at the end (it should say Wilhelm Wundt 1879 as stated earlier in the video, NOT 1897)! Check out the video on COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY here: ua-cam.com/video/NQSU6tAqvOA/v-deo.html
More Psychology resources here: www.bearitinmind.org
Would the timeline not include all the other approaches like the psychodynamic, SLT and humanistic approach?
@@roarwoof8816 Good question - the timeline is just trying to give you an overview of the progression of psychology as a science. The psychodynamic and humanistic approaches are non-scientific and are therefore not applicable. SLT overlaps with Behaviourism as both classed as Learning theories and adopt scientific methodology. Hope that helps :)
@@BearitinMIND Oh I seeee, thank you :) !
Thank you so much for making this video- father of psychology, I will share this video in our psychology whats up group if it is OK with you.
Share away 👍glad you found the video helpful ☺️
words cannot describe how grateful I am that this video exists, thank you so much.
You are most welcome 😊So glad it has been helpful for you!
my psychology teacher shows us some of your videos in our lessons sometimes, and i honestly understand the content more from you than from my teacher lol... thank you for the high quality videos they really help me with my revision!
Thank you 😊Delighted the videos have been helpful for you, especially with your revision. Hope you smash any exams you have coming up!
I realize this was posted a few years ago, but I just want to say that I am incredibly thankful for your videos. I have my first Psych test today, and out of all the videos I’ve watched that cover the first chapter of my textbook, this video has clarified it the best for me. The concept check questions are also very helpful! I’m actually feeling pretty confident about my test now, thanks again!! 😊😊
Delighted the video has been helpful for you 😊All the best with your upcoming test 👍Hope you enjoy and benefit from many of the other videos on the channel.
honestly I probably would dread revising psychology more than leg day if this channel didn't exist, you are responsible for my grades solely and thank you for the time and effort you put into making these incredible videos, please make them on every topic 🙏
Wow, thank you! Really appreciate you taking the time to write such a great comment😊 More videos on the way, and something new on the website coming soon so look out for that in December/New Year.
These videos are unreal! The editing is fantastic and it must take you ages! you deserve way more views
Cheers 👍 That’s so nice of you to say.
as a psychology student I did benefit from this video a lot thank you very much.
Glad to hear the video helped you. Hope you enjoy many of the other videos on the channel with your psychology studies.
youtube.com/@frommindtoheartpsychology
Everything about this is amazing!
This channel is highly addictive. Videos are very much informative and engaging. Its like watching a movie ... Thankyou for such a quality content... You are a true teacher..❤
Thank you Sadashiva😊 Glad you are enjoying the videos on the channel! Hope you continue to find many more of them helpful.
So glad I found your channel!! I'm doing a level psychology at the moment (just started) and you will help me so much when I end up sitting my a level exams! Amazing channel, keep it up!:))
Cheers 😊 Welcome to psychology! Hope you really enjoy the course, and even more so, exploring psychology beyond it. Thanks for your kind and encouraging words about the channel 👍Hope you continue to benefit from the videos!
No doubt: I shall bear your excellent clips in my mind! :) best wishes...
👍 glad the videos have been helping you bear them in mind 😉
Even though its not on the spec this is just great for learning psychology in general and really helps my understanding
Thanks Aaron 😀 Really appreciate your comment. You sound like you have a real interest in psychology. Even though Wundt isn't on the advanced information, (so you shouldn't get asked a direct question about it), you could still use some of this material on Wundt in relation to evaluation in a Behaviourist essay (i.e. Behaviourism moved away from the subjectivity of introspection and argued that psychology should study directly observable and measurable behaviour - as such it helped psychology gain credibility as a science 👍
This was really helpful
Glad I found your channel 😊
Thank you 🙂 Really pleased the video was helpful for you!
I’m glad this was taken off the specification in advance information
I know exactly what you mean Alex! I know from teaching it for many years that this isn't the easiest part to get your head round. Although here's a little tip - even thought this isn't on the advanced information, (so you shouldn't get asked a direct question about it), you could still use some of this material on Wundt in relation to evaluation in a Behaviourist essay (i.e. Behaviourism moved away from the subjectivity of introspection and argued that psychology should study directly observable and measurable behaviour - as such it helped psychology gain credibility as a science 👍 All the best with this summers exams!
@@BearitinMIND thank you very much I’ll keep it in mind
I would advise to ‘bear it in mind’ instead of ‘keep it in mind’ 😉
This video is really helpful ❤.
It is just straight to the point
Thank you 😀 Glad you enjoyed the video and found it helpful 👍
Thanks for the simplicity of this video great !
Glad you enjoyed the video and found it helpful. Thanks for commenting 😊
Amazing video! it helped me understand structuralism a lot better...
Thanks Norjay 👍 Glad you enjoyed the video and the content was helpful to your learning.
Excellent video! 👍🏼👏🏼🙌🏼
Thank you very much! A rather niche video - so pleased you liked. Thanks for the encouraging comment 👍
Yesterday was Wilhelm Birthday!!! Happy Birthday
Happy Birthday Wilhelm! Thanks for the reminder 🎂
Thank you verry much, this video is so helpfully for me as a beginner. Hopefully you keep it up this channel
So pleased the video has helped your understanding 😀 And thanks for the encouragement 👍More videos to come!
@@BearitinMIND Btw may i know your instagram or anything else. So i can know your profile as my reference, thank you
@@132galihfirmansyah8 my UA-cam handle is @BearitinMIND
very helpful video...thank you
Glad it was helpful!
Thank you 😊
You're welcome - hope the video was helpful :)
Calmness🔥
Calmness 🔥
☺️
Hey mate another great video 👍. I'm sure you probably started working on this vid before the advance information came out. But is there any chance the next few videos be focused around the spec points we need to know for this years exam?
Cheers Tom 😀 Behaviourism video dropping shortly, with others to follow. Although here's a little tip - even though this isn't on the advanced information, (so you shouldn't get asked a direct question about it), you could still use some of this material on Wundt in relation to evaluation in a Behaviourist essay (i.e. Behaviourism moved away from the subjectivity of introspection and argued that psychology should study directly observable and measurable behaviour - as such it helped psychology gain credibility as a science) 👍
@@BearitinMIND Very good point actually mate cheers 👍
Introspection is still something we rely on everyday. For example, when we trust eyewitness accounts. We take it for granted that subjectivity has sub-par truth value, but clearly we're not consistent in applying this belief
So, given someone is not intentionally lying to you, why exactly might a subjective account be worse? Are there more cases than the one I mentioned in which it isn't?
Thanks for your thoughts, and agree with you that subjectivity certainly has value. I think the point made by others about the issue with subjectivity relates to the scientific process. The scientific process requires measurements and data to be as objective as possible because this way they can be checked and verified.
If I'm understanding your example correctly, with eyewitness testimony, one eye witness to a crime is often not strong evidence because whilst it is subjective (and not necessarily any less true) scientists stress the need to verify and check that what they said is true. In other words, how would we know whether they are lying or not? Or giving socially desirable answers?
However, it TWO independent eyewitnesses report the same thing, then this helps to verify what they said - we can check the reliability of their reports.
In Wundt's case it is relying on the individual to report what was going on in their mind - but how do we know if this is true? How do we know that they even know what is going on in their head? There are many cases where eyewitnesses to crimes have reported what they saw honestly and truthfully as they understood it - but it turned out they actually completely wrong in their descriptions of what happened! Subjective reports - but they need verifying.
Like I said, I hope I've understood where you were coming from and what I've said above makes sense - let me know if not, and also if you have more thoughts on the matter that I haven't thought about 👍
Brillaint videos, will you ever do stress?
Cheers Aaron 👍Glad you liked it. Currently working on videos relating to the Approaches but will definitely doing stress at some point.
Awesome! Just found your channel. Do you have any recommendation for a good introductory book?
Check out this list of books: www.bearitinmind.org/articles/newtopsychologystarthere
@@BearitinMIND great website. but the links aren't working. any way to get those back up again?
@buuummm Thanks for letting me know :) Hopefully this works for you now www.bearitinmind.org/articles
@@BearitinMIND thanks for the links. I noticed, however, that there's no link for the "top 5 mental disorders". If you have time, I was hoping to see your recs for that. Also the affiliate links takes the user to amazon uk. I'm based in the US; if you have affiliate links for Amazon US, then i can make the purchases through that. def want to support you and your work.
Wow - thank you for such a kind and generous comment in so many ways :)
Firstly - hopefully now the website has updated and you will now be able to access the article to the mental disorder book recommendations.
Secondly - hopefully when you click any of the Amazon links it takes you to the USA Amazon page - PLEASE do let me know if that hasn't worked. Would greatly appreciate the feedback!
Thirdly - thank you again for your generosity and kindness in wanting to support the work of this channel - it is very much appreciated and wonderfully encouraging. Can I ask what your area of interest is in psychology (student/teacher/high school/college etc?), and are there any areas of psychology/video ideas that you would like to see?
❤️👏🙏🏻
👍🏻
Indeed, Wundt´s introspection is not statistic-friendly, because the act of therapeutic reflection is a way of self development and self-psychotherapy. Putting that practice into the lab doesnt make any real sense.
It is highly subjective and relative because all human beings are like that, and thats why psychotherapy is also an artform full of subleties in language and relationship between the patient and the therapist, no matter what the school of thinking.
Andres - thanks for the comment, and your further analysis from a statistical basis alongside psychotherapy. Always interesting to consider the tension between psychology's efforts to be scientific and in the subjective, idiographic applications in such therapies.
@@BearitinMIND I personally cant consider psychotherapy a statistical science at all. Social Psychology and similar ones can benefit from those efforts, but human beings are subjective in nature.
I can consider psychotherapy as powerful artistic science that finds results in the liveness of the session.
Who cares if ABC is 50% better than BDE?
That doesnt say anything truly relevant.
Psychotherapy teaches us that knowledge is great, but it is nothing without human connection, empathy and professional compassion
Yeah people just assume that I can read mind as soon as I mention psychology. That's just hilarious coz I always answer yes I can
Sorry if its a private question, but are you a real teacher? If not you should be!!
What a nice comment 🙂 Thank you - and yes I am a teacher📚