Tbh the Q7 still feels modern after all these years. Dysfunctional 3rd row and relatively poor cargo space are not serving Audi well though so they should work on that. Also tbh I’m not a fan of how the Q7 looks on the outside but that’s also just personal preference.
I rented one from Audi's Silvercar service in 2021. It was fantastic. We took it from NYC to Providence, RI for a family road trip. However, with the new Lexus TX, I'm not sure if Audi really has an advantage in this segment anymore.
I have a 2021. Had a 2023 loaner for a week. I noticed the 2023 had much better tighter steering especially at low speeds. And also, I noticed it didn't have that lag they're known for when hitting the gas. This is the 6 cylinder I am talking about. I really wish my 2021 drove like this this one
Pay 500.00 for the dual pane glass, well worth it. As to this model...she needs a major refresh in styling, definitely more fuel efficient and more performance, not impressed anymore vs the competition. Lastly, make that 3rd row a few more inches larger so that an adult can at least be comfortable for a few hours back there. We own an Audi but looking at Merc and BMW which are longer and wider by a few more inches. Thanks for a great review.
Oh you like Unreliable cars anyway 😂😂😂. Audi, bmw. Nice vehicles but you obviously don't care about durability and reliability, so idk why you're Complaining for anyway
You make no sense. What is reliable?? We presently own Audi S7, Q5, Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Toyota Prius, Nissan Rouge, Ford F250, F150 and GMC 1500. The Audis we have owned have been flawless and the last Q5 had over 126k miles. The 2013 S7 presently has 211k miles. The Audi Q5 has 55k miles and we are now wanting something larger and more up to date for traveling. Merc and BMW have freshened their 5 series as well as 7 and Merc has done the same...and Audi needs a refresh and is lagging behind...much like your comment.@@Foreign84
@@Foreign84 I read the comment multiple times over and I don’t see a single word related to reliability mentioned in it. Also does it rly matter to you if they don’t care about reliability?
Most comfortable SUV on the market (excluding the Bentayga and Culanin) is def the Range Rover. Q7 does not come close though it’s still very comfortable (just like a MDX for say). X5 cabin is relatively cramped but that doesn’t stop me from loving the vehicle and tbh the GLE is simply way too unreliable.
@@CarGeek360 Agreed, love GLE and X5, but not something I would buy for my family. But yes Range Rover beats in comfort but a Q7 is more affordable for a family.
@@tylaturner X5 is an awesome SUV if you don’t go on long road trips and you don’t need a 3rd row, I also love the GLE but it’s sadly pretty unreliable, I would probably go with a MDX, Model X, or the new TX if I was shopping in this segment
@@RJ-xj3ct I'd have to disagree. I'd say the Q7 without air suspension rides similar to a normal MDX (they handle similar too) and I doubt air suspension will make a substantial difference (though it will make a difference). The Q7 cabin is definitely slightly quieter relative to the MDX one but honestly the difference is not much at all (both are extremely quiet). Tbh I like the GLE the most of the bunch (just not the 4 cylinder one) but unfortunately it's the most problematic one of the group. Q7 also has a dysfunctional 3rd row, tiny trunk, and I do not like the exterior at all. Atp if one was looking at a Q7 they are FAR better off spending a little more and getting a Q8. Much better looking vehicle and sportier too.
My personal pick would honestly either be a BMW X5 or Audi Q8 as those are better looking vehicles and sportier but if I was looking for something more practical I would go Acura MDX or even hybrid Lexus TX.
@@CarGeek360 While I do agree with some points cheaper cars simply don't carry the same solidity of the Q7. Q7 and Q8 are also identical in pretty much every way so they are going to drive pretty much the same. Like any car in the class the 3rd row is just for a pinch not meant to be used regularly. For regular use you should look at full size suvs. Trunk is also not tiny lmfao its adequate for the class. Also a well equipped q7 is around 75-80k. A q8 starts at that price and has less room and utility so I don't see why you should get one another than aesthetic reasons. Where the Q7 really shines IMO is just its composure. Bumps are isolated and vibrations don't carry its way into the cabin. Road noise is almost non-existant and the high speed stability is so good. Its a tank. The rear steer is also a good option. I think the q Is lackluster if not speced correctly but if you do spend the extra dime and throw on the options its just as good if not better than its competition in most regards. Better ride than GLE, GLS(not 580 variants),, x5, mdx, volvo xc90(this car is a mess).
I don’t know as I’ve never been in one but everyone says it rides really nicely over rough roads. I highly recommend test driving one for yourself though as people have different opinions and biasses. People seem to like the new TX a lot and I can see why.
@@CarGeek360 I mean, if we can agree on that Lexus is a luxury brand, then I don't find it to be so much different than a Toyota. Especially the new cars like the prius, way smoother and refine than my rx450h. Although the interior material and the audio system is better on the Lexus, I don't see why there is like $30000 or $40000 price difference. But I understand that some people are willing to pay the extra $$$ for 10% of improvement. It's just the Luxury brands aren't quite as good as they use to be.
@@flandrescarlet486 idk if I agree ngl. The difference between a top-trim mainstream vehicle and a luxury vehicle isn’t much but it is definitely very noticeable. Also I’m shocked you find a Prius to be more refined than a RX as most would disagree but I won’t comment about that as I have never been in either vehicle.
currently leasing a 21 Q7 with same package it's a good car but was hoping the 24 has a face lift. my lease is up in 8 month so hopefully by then the 25 Q7 would be coming out.
The Acura RDX doesn't come close to competing against the Audi Q7. The MDX is a more direct class comparison for the Q7. The RDX would compete against the Audi Q5. Typical rookie mistake on your part 🤔
My parents cross-shopped the MDX and Q7 about a year ago (normal MDX Advance and fully loaded Q7 Prestige). After test driving both, my dad and I truthfully agreed that even if both SUVs were the same price, we’d still take the MDX (fully unbiased opinion as both were well within budget for us). Now we are very happy with our new Acura and my mom loves driving it. Only reason we didn’t get a Type-S Advance is bc those have low-profile tires that go flat easily and we drive on many bad roads. Q7 also had a dysfunctional 3rd row and cargo space was not so good ngl.
You are smarter than most. I couldn’t agree more! For anything above 45k for this hideous hunk of metal & I’m out too. I had a 2006 Quattro A6 & it drives better than this!
It's A-Okay until you tune it - You'll want to keep driving it faster and quicker - then all those cons you won't even think about. Just remember to put some money away (when past warranty) to replace the pair of engine mounts when they start leaking.In addition because it is a turbo (instead of the better supercharger from 2017 and the past), best do oil changes earlier to keep that turbocharger in good condition - it is an oil burner and expensive to replace
I should add my mom has an SQ7 and it’s a completely different car. Transmission and suspension world’s ahead and extended leather transforms the interior. Same finicky touchscreen though
I have the new 2024 Q7 and I'm a long time Audi owner - I've had 3x now where I drove a short distance, not at high speeds or any crazy weather and the turbo fans up front run for like 5 min after you have turned off the car. I've seen this before with my older 2015 Audi but this is new for me on the new 2024. Is it the turbo fans or is it something else? Air is coming out the front and it runs for about 2-5 minutes. I've driving the car about 10 times. Was trying to find some info online before I call them.
It might be an extra protection for the turbos. Usually, after a trip, you should let the car idle for a minute or two. But this might be an easier war to protect the turbos by running oil through it and cooling it down 🤷♂️
Wow amazing, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024.....:same fokkin car. GREAT JOB AUDI, keep it up. This must be a modern times record, 10 production years . People are stupid and will continue buying whatever they are offered
Wow, I rather have a minivan than this one. Not impressed for the price. The climate control touch screen takes up so much space, and looks a bit tacky to me.
To me it's not that bad? The car feels so outdated tho. The other competitors have technology that's a step above. Audi needs to get their shi together and make an upgrade soon.
I like the Q8 a lot more personally. Looks so much better and much sportier. People say the Q7 is good cuz if 3rd row and more cargo but tbh the difference isn’t much and the Q7 3rd row is useless. If you want something with 3-rows of seating, check out the Acura MDX, Lexus TX, Mazda CX90, Volvo XC90, Infiniti QX60, and BMW X7 (I would skip right past Merc due to bad reliability). I’d avoid the Type-S MDX though if you’re often on bad roads as those have low-profile tires that go flat easily but if you’re primarily on good quality roads then the MDX Type-S is a fabulous one.
Is this 2023 or 24 Q7? I don’t see that facelift Audi being talking about. There’s really no significant changes. I was waiting to see this before making the decision to buy one. It was this or the Range Rover and I settled for the Range Rover.
Range Rover is honestly on a whole different league from this Q7. It's def a class above. Interesting you chose to cross-shop the two (though both are great) but I'm glad you went for the superior vehicle.
Nothing " new " about the Q7 . Has to be 16-17 years OLD by now . Had the smallest third row when it was first released . Audi tryin to give the Ford Crown Vic a run for the " OG " title .
Yeah I would not recommend the Q7 to anyone. So many better options for less money that I would take over a Q7 even if they were the same price as one.
I’d avoid the GLE and GLS due to horrible reliability. I’m not a fan of this either so I’d go MDX/TX tbh. X7 is great too if you don’t mind the somewhat cramped legroom.
Except for the gauge cluster / infotainment system… the rest of this Audi is very out-dated. The way you have to push and tilt up the second row seats to get into the third row is just laughable!
I so much wanted to like this car, but Audi’s slab-sided styling on the Q5 and Q7 just isn’t for me and never has been - it’s just too bland - and the engines are unimpressive unless you go SQ. I no longer really need the third row so went with the X5 40i.
There are a few mainstream SUVs I'd get over this(Mazda CX-90, GC Summit, Hyundai Palisade Calligraphy). I'd consider the Acura MDX Type-S or Genesis GV80 before this aa well. $80K is a tough sale here, considering the fact that you can get a MB GLS450 or BMW X7 40i for that money.
I rly like the MDX Type-S but those low-profile tires will go flat easily on whack roads. My personal recommendations in this segment would be a CX90, normal MDX, TX, and X7 depending on what you want. GLS is amazing too but sadly hella unreliable.
@@CarGeek360 because it’s not very good. Everything’s wrong with it. It came 5-10 years too late yet they still screwed it up badly The exterior is not attractive vs . Even a telluride or palisade look better. The interior is a mess tbh. It’s the worst in the class. Instead of using proper luxury car materials like a leather dashboard, full leather doors, leather airbag cover, lots of wood and metal trim, they use the same Toyota grade injection molded plastics from a rav4, no wood trim in any version and lots of hard plastics. Basically the easiest way to say this is that if you look at the TX and then look at just about any other suv like the telluride prestige or palisade calligraphy cx90 premium, MDX, aviator, x5, x7, q7, GLE GLS, XT6, gv80, QX60, grand Cherokee summit and summit reserve, xc90, you’ll know exactly what I’m talking about. As for tech, it’s still dated while simultaneously completely useless. For starts nobody ever asked for electronic door handles. Nobody ever asked for the steering wheel touchpad heads up display combo. Nobody ever asked for the complete eradication of physical controls. And the infotainment still lags behind the competition. A 20k Kia Hyundai product have a better infotainment system. Think about that. If that wasn’t enough, the 12.3in gauge cluster is not customizable vs the competition. And also it’s not standard. A 7in mid that’s ripped right off a corolla is standard And it lacks so many features compared to the competition such as a double wishbone front suspension, air suspension, massaging seats, passenger seat memory, 4 zone climate control, ottomans in the 2nd row, power rear seats, removable middle seat, heated 3rd row seats, or as a bonus, ventilated 3rd row seats Don’t even get me started on the powertrains. I do like the fact that there are 3 choices. Unfortunately none of them are impressive to begin with. The TX350 uses the same 2.4T I4 as a highlander LE. And it’s very slow 0-60 at over 8 seconds so it’s as fast as a corolla. Literally any other suv it competes with is faster. Forget the Germans. A base telluride palisade pilot or base MDX or base grand Cherokee are significantly faster. Even the already mediocre xt6 is faster. The TX500h “F Sport Performance” (yeah right 🙄) isn’t even faster than those mainstream SUVs. It’s not even faster than a base ford Explorer w the 2.3 ecoboost 4. And it’s still significantly slower than a base aviator, Explorer ST, base x7, GLS, Q7. And it’s still slower than the MDX type S, gv80 3.5T, Durango RT yet the TX has more power and more instant torque from the electric motors. Then the TX550h+. I like the fact that it uses a v6. But the problem is that not only is it still slow, but it also means getting a naturally aspirated v6 in general in the TX will be significantly more expensive than getting a naturally aspirated v6 in just about anything else. And the ev range isn’t all that good. It’s less than the xc90, and now the x5 PHEV. Driving experience and handling performance fall behind just about any of its competitors both luxury and even mainstream. It doesn’t ride as well as the competition with air suspensions. If you don’t care about acceleration or handling you should just buy a corolla instead. If a luxury car reminds you of a sub 30k economy car in terms of its underpinnings then it’s not a luxury car. And finally the TX is overpriced. It starts at 55K. So it’s more expensive than the MDX, xc90, aviator or those top end mainstream SUVs. And the 500h costs 70L, so it’s expensive as the MDX type S but nowhere near as competitive as the Acura. And the 550h+ will likely cost over 80k maybe even 90-100k and you still get a vehicle that’s based on a Toyota Camry platform. Nothing luxury about that.
Im sorry but I cannot forgive all of the piano black plastic on this interior or in any vehicle. Its widely known that we all hate it because of dust and fingerprints and automakers are still using it abundance. Audi its time for complete redesigns, this is not worth 80k!
Bimmer is still better boo boo! You need to do more to get a taste of my delicious yams! Best get me that X7 if you want these cakes!!! Sorry not sorry boo boo!!!
X7 is def the benchmark of 3-row luxury SUVs (especially the V8 ones but even the 40i) for the most part but the legroom is very disappointing. It’s the one big reason why I would take an Acura MDX or a Lexus TX over it. X7 also has a lot more gimmicks but that can be a pro or a con depending on the specific buyer.
The buttonless gloss black dashboard panel with triple-screens looks beyond cheap and gaudy. Not to mention, it reflects sunlight right into your eyes and is a finger print magnet. A far cry from Audi's design peak in the late 2000s and early 2010s.
Idk why but they need too redesign this and the q5 there old and boring its like audi is giving up or something so many vehicles are better than this dinosaur even mainstream vehicles they gave me one when my x7 was getting a oil change and I absolutely hated it
Why not be straight up in this review and tell it like it is? This thing is way past its sell by date and looks like shit. I just sold my fully loaded 2017 Q7 for a Q8 etron. Even the 2023 Q7 is just as dated as the 2017 despite the enhancements. I loved the utility value of the car, though you’d have to be bonkers to buy this car new in 2023. Wait for the next gen (which will hopefully be more of a looker)
@@krystle8287 I disagree with that as it’s still a great car but I like the MDX more so I would def take a MDX over it unless the Q7 was substantially cheaper which would likely never happen.
The Q7 is hideous & not enjoyable to drive. Not to mention it’s completely overpriced & you pay a bunch of $ for features that do not matter at all & are completely unnecessary. I do not need a computer in my car, I already have an overly fancy phone computer I can use GPS w/in any car I’m ever in. Ugh. I can’t stand fancy upgraded cars these days. Most makes are all hideous & have way too much that’s entirely unnecessary & harder to work on. I’d much rather pay for a robust car you can actually work on yourself & not be so flashy & overpriced, not to mention these cars don’t hold their value whatsoever so if you get one, don’t expect to get much of anything back. This is a stupid investment. Unless you just have $ to burn & like ugly rides that don’t give great drives.. don’t buy this. Buy a used, basic car & you’ll be much better off in the long run. Or a van, which actually has awesome features in it designed for carrying multiple passengers rather than this one, which does not. Neither does it have good, practical cargo space. If you are tall or larger, don’t bother w/this car either bc in the case of an accident your legs & lower body stands no chance whatsoever. It doesn’t matter how great it does in safety tests when there’s NO leg room for taller people. This car is not my personal preference, if you couldn’t tell. 🤣 to me, we are going backwards w/cars just like w/people in society at large. We are regressing, not progressing. All dressed up on the outside & flashy for the world but w/no real substance to speak of & terrible to have to deal with; despite appearances. I long for the days of the muscle cars, when things were more simple, reliable, could be worked on & were beautiful to behold.
Looking to buy an Audi Q7 or any new vehicle? Go to carconfections.com/new-car-quotes to get the BEST price and access to invoice pricing information!
I was in middle school when this gen came out and now I am in college. That's how long this gen has been on the market
Tbh the Q7 still feels modern after all these years. Dysfunctional 3rd row and relatively poor cargo space are not serving Audi well though so they should work on that. Also tbh I’m not a fan of how the Q7 looks on the outside but that’s also just personal preference.
This is a 3rd Gen Q7. How i know cause i had own all 3
I rented one from Audi's Silvercar service in 2021. It was fantastic. We took it from NYC to Providence, RI for a family road trip.
However, with the new Lexus TX, I'm not sure if Audi really has an advantage in this segment anymore.
I have a 2021. Had a 2023 loaner for a week. I noticed the 2023 had much better tighter steering especially at low speeds. And also, I noticed it didn't have that lag they're known for when hitting the gas. This is the 6 cylinder I am talking about. I really wish my 2021 drove like this this one
Is that lag also felt in the Q7 3.0 engines? I though it was only felt on smaller engines
Should be a software update. See your dealer.
@@ronaldlamascus1944 yeah def software, I'll give it a shot and see what Audi says. Hopefully they'll provide it
@@tao5898yes I'm talking about the 3.0.
get an APR tune stage 1 it will eliminate the lag and give you 100 horsepower.
It’s a nice SUV but not my personal preference. I’d much rather have a Q8 or a Cayenne (or a MDX/TX if I wanted practicality).
Great review as always! Thanks guys.
Great job as always! Can you guys make a comparison between this and the TX? I’m really curious about that
Thanks! Good idea 👍
Car Confections make the best videos ever! 😁
And then some!
@@b286guy I agree! 😁
Thank you guys!
@@CarConfections You’re welcome 😊
Pay 500.00 for the dual pane glass, well worth it. As to this model...she needs a major refresh in styling, definitely more fuel efficient and more performance, not impressed anymore vs the competition. Lastly, make that 3rd row a few more inches larger so that an adult can at least be comfortable for a few hours back there. We own an Audi but looking at Merc and BMW which are longer and wider by a few more inches. Thanks for a great review.
Q7 is not worth it ngl. There’s so many other better choices.
Oh you like Unreliable cars anyway 😂😂😂. Audi, bmw. Nice vehicles but you obviously don't care about durability and reliability, so idk why you're Complaining for anyway
You make no sense. What is reliable?? We presently own Audi S7, Q5, Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Toyota Prius, Nissan Rouge, Ford F250, F150 and GMC 1500. The Audis we have owned have been flawless and the last Q5 had over 126k miles. The 2013 S7 presently has 211k miles. The Audi Q5 has 55k miles and we are now wanting something larger and more up to date for traveling. Merc and BMW have freshened their 5 series as well as 7 and Merc has done the same...and Audi needs a refresh and is lagging behind...much like your comment.@@Foreign84
@@Foreign84not at all true. Our 2013 A8L has had one vanity light switch fail in 10 years! That’s it! Otherwise, routine maintenance.
@@Foreign84 I read the comment multiple times over and I don’t see a single word related to reliability mentioned in it. Also does it rly matter to you if they don’t care about reliability?
the most comfortable luxury suv on the market, no one can change my mind. from x5s cramped cabin, to gles stiff and rough suspension.
Most comfortable SUV on the market (excluding the Bentayga and Culanin) is def the Range Rover. Q7 does not come close though it’s still very comfortable (just like a MDX for say). X5 cabin is relatively cramped but that doesn’t stop me from loving the vehicle and tbh the GLE is simply way too unreliable.
@@CarGeek360 Agreed, love GLE and X5, but not something I would buy for my family. But yes Range Rover beats in comfort but a Q7 is more affordable for a family.
@@tylaturner X5 is an awesome SUV if you don’t go on long road trips and you don’t need a 3rd row, I also love the GLE but it’s sadly pretty unreliable, I would probably go with a MDX, Model X, or the new TX if I was shopping in this segment
@@tylaturner Range Rover is also pretty unreliable but they are awesome, incredibly luxurious and comfortable too
I was so geek to watch ty
Fantastic review as always!!😸
Thanks again!
Under the drivers vent on the bottom is another storage area for little things wallet and stuff
Amazing review guys.
We love our ‘21 Q7 Prestige! Awesome vehicle and absolutely beautiful design! Looks better than most new SUV’s especially the BMW’s and GLE’s.
It’s not my favorite choice personally but I’m glad you are enjoying it.
@@CarGeek360 i would say it is the most refined and has the best ride of the bunch. I'd take it over x5, GLE, volvo xc90, and acura mdx.
@@RJ-xj3ct I'd have to disagree. I'd say the Q7 without air suspension rides similar to a normal MDX (they handle similar too) and I doubt air suspension will make a substantial difference (though it will make a difference). The Q7 cabin is definitely slightly quieter relative to the MDX one but honestly the difference is not much at all (both are extremely quiet). Tbh I like the GLE the most of the bunch (just not the 4 cylinder one) but unfortunately it's the most problematic one of the group. Q7 also has a dysfunctional 3rd row, tiny trunk, and I do not like the exterior at all. Atp if one was looking at a Q7 they are FAR better off spending a little more and getting a Q8. Much better looking vehicle and sportier too.
My personal pick would honestly either be a BMW X5 or Audi Q8 as those are better looking vehicles and sportier but if I was looking for something more practical I would go Acura MDX or even hybrid Lexus TX.
@@CarGeek360 While I do agree with some points cheaper cars simply don't carry the same solidity of the Q7. Q7 and Q8 are also identical in pretty much every way so they are going to drive pretty much the same. Like any car in the class the 3rd row is just for a pinch not meant to be used regularly. For regular use you should look at full size suvs. Trunk is also not tiny lmfao its adequate for the class. Also a well equipped q7 is around 75-80k. A q8 starts at that price and has less room and utility so I don't see why you should get one another than aesthetic reasons.
Where the Q7 really shines IMO is just its composure. Bumps are isolated and vibrations don't carry its way into the cabin. Road noise is almost non-existant and the high speed stability is so good. Its a tank. The rear steer is also a good option. I think the q Is lackluster if not speced correctly but if you do spend the extra dime and throw on the options its just as good if not better than its competition in most regards. Better ride than GLE, GLS(not 580 variants),, x5, mdx, volvo xc90(this car is a mess).
My only concern is how much is maintenance for this thing?
You should count door pockets and glove box as interior front storage.
You could but the lack of center console storage is still disappointing.
How does the Lexus TX rank in this class in terms of ride comfort, particularly over rougher roads?
Easy. The tx is the worst choice in the segment
The q7 is far superior in just about every aspect
@@naveenthemachine and what makes you say that?
I don’t know as I’ve never been in one but everyone says it rides really nicely over rough roads. I highly recommend test driving one for yourself though as people have different opinions and biasses. People seem to like the new TX a lot and I can see why.
Bring back the diesel version 😢
Cost is $34,000, and it's common in every area.
The luxury and non-luxury vehicles' boundary is unclear these days
Luxury vehicles just give you brand-prestige, a smoother ride, and a quieter cabin. I’d pay for the smoother ride and a quieter cabin tbh.
@@CarGeek360 Tbh normal brands are very quiet now especially the hybrid toyota, so damm smooth
@@flandrescarlet486 I don’t disagree but some people want an extra level of refinement which can only be found in a luxury vehicle.
@@CarGeek360 I mean, if we can agree on that Lexus is a luxury brand, then I don't find it to be so much different than a Toyota. Especially the new cars like the prius, way smoother and refine than my rx450h. Although the interior material and the audio system is better on the Lexus, I don't see why there is like $30000 or $40000 price difference. But I understand that some people are willing to pay the extra $$$ for 10% of improvement. It's just the Luxury brands aren't quite as good as they use to be.
@@flandrescarlet486 idk if I agree ngl. The difference between a top-trim mainstream vehicle and a luxury vehicle isn’t much but it is definitely very noticeable. Also I’m shocked you find a Prius to be more refined than a RX as most would disagree but I won’t comment about that as I have never been in either vehicle.
It looks alright
Yeah I’m not a fan of the exterior either. I’d much rather a Q8 for a little more money.
13:15 is that an ashtray on the door 👀
currently leasing a 21 Q7 with same package it's a good car but was hoping the 24 has a face lift. my lease is up in 8 month so hopefully by then the 25 Q7 would be coming out.
This car is awesome and review is great ❤. Love from India❤
Audi desperately needs a new chime sound
Suprised audi hasnt fully redesigned the model yet. IMO the latest facelift made it look super ugly compared to the pre-facelift version.
2 donuts only and dixie shot glass rear!!!??? Audi is definitely not a fam friendly suv. Thx guys for narrowing my search.
$80 thousand for this ouch 😓 so much money. And it’s not that impressive. I’ll take the Acura RDX!!!! Great videos as always guys. 👍🏼
The Acura RDX doesn't come close to competing against the Audi Q7. The MDX is a more direct class comparison for the Q7. The RDX would compete against the Audi Q5. Typical rookie mistake on your part 🤔
My parents cross-shopped the MDX and Q7 about a year ago (normal MDX Advance and fully loaded Q7 Prestige). After test driving both, my dad and I truthfully agreed that even if both SUVs were the same price, we’d still take the MDX (fully unbiased opinion as both were well within budget for us). Now we are very happy with our new Acura and my mom loves driving it. Only reason we didn’t get a Type-S Advance is bc those have low-profile tires that go flat easily and we drive on many bad roads. Q7 also had a dysfunctional 3rd row and cargo space was not so good ngl.
Thank you!
Anytime I'm lookin gfor a review, you guys have it.
We try to cover everything! Thanks for watching!
I am sure its a solid SUV but for 80K I am out!
You are smarter than most. I couldn’t agree more! For anything above 45k for this hideous hunk of metal & I’m out too. I had a 2006 Quattro A6 & it drives better than this!
I dont get it. Those lower grill is for 4cycl, but somehow its in 6cycl ._.
Hopefully, the new Q7 stop burning oil.
It's A-Okay until you tune it - You'll want to keep driving it faster and quicker - then all those cons you won't even think about. Just remember to put some money away (when past warranty) to replace the pair of engine mounts when they start leaking.In addition because it is a turbo (instead of the better supercharger from 2017 and the past), best do oil changes earlier to keep that turbocharger in good condition - it is an oil burner and expensive to replace
21 mpg combined??? that would be a hard no. Mercedes or BMW for me.
I have a 23 Q8 and hate it. Transmission is terrible and chassis is floaty (no air suspension). Also detest the climate control touchscreen
I should add my mom has an SQ7 and it’s a completely different car. Transmission and suspension world’s ahead and extended leather transforms the interior. Same finicky touchscreen though
I didn’t. My wife did. I was in the back seat but given I’m way pickier and more into cars than her, I should’ve. Lesson learned
@japanwatchconnectionI do think it’s one of if not the best looking cars on the road. And didn’t want a merc or bmw equivalent so
Well i have a 2015 tdi q7 and it does everything i need. Mileage is pretty good. Would not trade it for this long new generation
Yeah you’re better off sticking to your current one tbh.
have 2022 prestige, no remote start, no place to put phone. always have to keek in your pocket or hand ✋️
I have the new 2024 Q7 and I'm a long time Audi owner - I've had 3x now where I drove a short distance, not at high speeds or any crazy weather and the turbo fans up front run for like 5 min after you have turned off the car. I've seen this before with my older 2015 Audi but this is new for me on the new 2024. Is it the turbo fans or is it something else? Air is coming out the front and it runs for about 2-5 minutes. I've driving the car about 10 times. Was trying to find some info online before I call them.
It might be an extra protection for the turbos. Usually, after a trip, you should let the car idle for a minute or two. But this might be an easier war to protect the turbos by running oil through it and cooling it down 🤷♂️
Is there a spare wheel?
I like it but also like the new lexus t x
The Tx is a much worse car than any of the competition
I rly like the TX too especially the PHEV one.
When you get a chance, check out the lucid gravity at the LA auto show
respect dizain ineterior and exteriorn ,✊✊👍🤩
Wow amazing, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024.....:same fokkin car. GREAT JOB AUDI, keep it up. This must be a modern times record, 10 production years . People are stupid and will continue buying whatever they are offered
I prefer almost every other option in the segment tbh but to each their own.
Yup! With you 100%
its nice to buy a 2015 and not have an outdated car in 2024. It's a smart business move. Wait until next year a new one will come out.
Wow, I rather have a minivan than this one. Not impressed for the price. The climate control touch screen takes up so much space, and looks a bit tacky to me.
To me it's not that bad? The car feels so outdated tho. The other competitors have technology that's a step above. Audi needs to get their shi together and make an upgrade soon.
I Can't Stand Blacked Out Trims !!! For That Much Money, I Want Bling !!!!!!!! 🙂
Is north America getting the new 2024 Q6 , a 7 seater too,
The vehicle’s updates were not worthy of a review
Yea. Audi q7 needs an upgrade and also some of their other things
Matrix-DESIGN headlights, but not really matrix. This car really needs a major update.
Someday, I buy the new 2024 Audi Q7 SUV.
I like the Q8 a lot more personally. Looks so much better and much sportier. People say the Q7 is good cuz if 3rd row and more cargo but tbh the difference isn’t much and the Q7 3rd row is useless. If you want something with 3-rows of seating, check out the Acura MDX, Lexus TX, Mazda CX90, Volvo XC90, Infiniti QX60, and BMW X7 (I would skip right past Merc due to bad reliability). I’d avoid the Type-S MDX though if you’re often on bad roads as those have low-profile tires that go flat easily but if you’re primarily on good quality roads then the MDX Type-S is a fabulous one.
U should not get this prob
@@thereo420 wdym?
@CarGeek360 there are better options than this plus the q7s have been pretty much the same for a few years now
@@thereo420 I fully agree with you that there are a lot of better options than this Q7.
Please do Toyota grand highlander hybrid max on your local roads! 😊
Is this 2023 or 24 Q7? I don’t see that facelift Audi being talking about. There’s really no significant changes. I was waiting to see this before making the decision to buy one. It was this or the Range Rover and I settled for the Range Rover.
It is predicted that the Q7 will have a heavy refresh for 2025
Range Rover is honestly on a whole different league from this Q7. It's def a class above. Interesting you chose to cross-shop the two (though both are great) but I'm glad you went for the superior vehicle.
There is storage to left of wheel
I saw Mason In the side view mirror 6:19
Nothing " new " about the Q7 . Has to be 16-17 years OLD by now . Had the smallest third row when it was first released . Audi tryin to give the Ford Crown Vic a run for the " OG " title .
Yeah I would not recommend the Q7 to anyone. So many better options for less money that I would take over a Q7 even if they were the same price as one.
I prefer Q8
Great design let’s put a adapter in the cup holder, so liquid can get all over it.
How the f is this big suv available with the 2.0T
I think my 2024 Atlas Cross sport looks better inside and out :-O
Great engines but dated styling….need a complete uplift
This or the GLE ?
I’d avoid the GLE and GLS due to horrible reliability. I’m not a fan of this either so I’d go MDX/TX tbh. X7 is great too if you don’t mind the somewhat cramped legroom.
@@CarGeek360 yeah i like the look and techs of the German cars but nothing can beat the Japanese Lexus or Acura reliability.
@@tommytqt1 all depends on what you want rly. You can’t go wrong with any as long as yk what you’re going into.
Except for the gauge cluster / infotainment system… the rest of this Audi is very out-dated. The way you have to push and tilt up the second row seats to get into the third row is just laughable!
I so much wanted to like this car, but Audi’s slab-sided styling on the Q5 and Q7 just isn’t for me and never has been - it’s just too bland - and the engines are unimpressive unless you go SQ. I no longer really need the third row so went with the X5 40i.
Almost no difference with the previous version.
isn't this your truck
There are a few mainstream SUVs I'd get over this(Mazda CX-90, GC Summit, Hyundai Palisade Calligraphy). I'd consider the Acura MDX Type-S or Genesis GV80 before this aa well. $80K is a tough sale here, considering the fact that you can get a MB GLS450 or BMW X7 40i for that money.
so agree! $80k is a super tough sale ... I would pick all your other mentioned before this
But I’d consider the q7 over the TX without hesitation
I rly like the MDX Type-S but those low-profile tires will go flat easily on whack roads. My personal recommendations in this segment would be a CX90, normal MDX, TX, and X7 depending on what you want. GLS is amazing too but sadly hella unreliable.
@@naveenthemachine why do you hate the TX so much? I’m just curious tbh.
@@CarGeek360 because it’s not very good. Everything’s wrong with it. It came 5-10 years too late yet they still screwed it up badly
The exterior is not attractive vs . Even a telluride or palisade look better. The interior is a mess tbh. It’s the worst in the class. Instead of using proper luxury car materials like a leather dashboard, full leather doors, leather airbag cover, lots of wood and metal trim, they use the same Toyota grade injection molded plastics from a rav4, no wood trim in any version and lots of hard plastics. Basically the easiest way to say this is that if you look at the TX and then look at just about any other suv like the telluride prestige or palisade calligraphy cx90 premium, MDX, aviator, x5, x7, q7, GLE GLS, XT6, gv80, QX60, grand Cherokee summit and summit reserve, xc90, you’ll know exactly what I’m talking about.
As for tech, it’s still dated while simultaneously completely useless. For starts nobody ever asked for electronic door handles. Nobody ever asked for the steering wheel touchpad heads up display combo. Nobody ever asked for the complete eradication of physical controls. And the infotainment still lags behind the competition. A 20k Kia Hyundai product have a better infotainment system. Think about that. If that wasn’t enough, the 12.3in gauge cluster is not customizable vs the competition. And also it’s not standard. A 7in mid that’s ripped right off a corolla is standard
And it lacks so many features compared to the competition such as a double wishbone front suspension, air suspension, massaging seats, passenger seat memory, 4 zone climate control, ottomans in the 2nd row, power rear seats, removable middle seat, heated 3rd row seats, or as a bonus, ventilated 3rd row seats
Don’t even get me started on the powertrains. I do like the fact that there are 3 choices. Unfortunately none of them are impressive to begin with. The TX350 uses the same 2.4T I4 as a highlander LE. And it’s very slow 0-60 at over 8 seconds so it’s as fast as a corolla. Literally any other suv it competes with is faster. Forget the Germans. A base telluride palisade pilot or base MDX or base grand Cherokee are significantly faster. Even the already mediocre xt6 is faster. The TX500h “F Sport Performance” (yeah right 🙄) isn’t even faster than those mainstream SUVs. It’s not even faster than a base ford Explorer w the 2.3 ecoboost 4. And it’s still significantly slower than a base aviator, Explorer ST, base x7, GLS, Q7. And it’s still slower than the MDX type S, gv80 3.5T, Durango RT yet the TX has more power and more instant torque from the electric motors. Then the TX550h+. I like the fact that it uses a v6. But the problem is that not only is it still slow, but it also means getting a naturally aspirated v6 in general in the TX will be significantly more expensive than getting a naturally aspirated v6 in just about anything else. And the ev range isn’t all that good. It’s less than the xc90, and now the x5 PHEV.
Driving experience and handling performance fall behind just about any of its competitors both luxury and even mainstream. It doesn’t ride as well as the competition with air suspensions. If you don’t care about acceleration or handling you should just buy a corolla instead. If a luxury car reminds you of a sub 30k economy car in terms of its underpinnings then it’s not a luxury car.
And finally the TX is overpriced. It starts at 55K. So it’s more expensive than the MDX, xc90, aviator or those top end mainstream SUVs. And the 500h costs 70L, so it’s expensive as the MDX type S but nowhere near as competitive as the Acura. And the 550h+ will likely cost over 80k maybe even 90-100k and you still get a vehicle that’s based on a Toyota Camry platform. Nothing luxury about that.
Im sorry but I cannot forgive all of the piano black plastic on this interior or in any vehicle. Its widely known that we all hate it because of dust and fingerprints and automakers are still using it abundance. Audi its time for complete redesigns, this is not worth 80k!
0:10 Kinda sus lol.. 1:38 maybe keep it to one guy per car review.
What on earth are you on about bud
jinkys ; what's the capital of outerspace
😁Cảm ơn bạn!
Thank you, friend! We appreciate your support of our channel ☺️
Q&A your up
lets see what that bed cylinder you java now is for
COUNTRY?
United States of America
You look tiny in that car at the start of the video !!
Don't buy this, 2025 is the second facelift.
Hopefully they make it more practical and better looking for 2025.
That third row is ok for short trips. I’m 5ft 8in and if you set all the seats to be comfortable it works.
I sat in the 3rd row of one when I was 5’2” and was very uncomfortable. I found my legs to be in an awkward position.
Like a Chinese style way production looks like 🤔🤨😒 and not so attractive as too much hmmm,😒 what's up Audi ? 🤔🤨
Bimmer is still better boo boo! You need to do more to get a taste of my delicious yams! Best get me that X7 if you want these cakes!!! Sorry not sorry boo boo!!!
X7 is def the benchmark of 3-row luxury SUVs (especially the V8 ones but even the 40i) for the most part but the legroom is very disappointing. It’s the one big reason why I would take an Acura MDX or a Lexus TX over it. X7 also has a lot more gimmicks but that can be a pro or a con depending on the specific buyer.
The buttonless gloss black dashboard panel with triple-screens looks beyond cheap and gaudy. Not to mention, it reflects sunlight right into your eyes and is a finger print magnet. A far cry from Audi's design peak in the late 2000s and early 2010s.
Looks like a wagon
What a waste, get Q5😂
simply so ugly, look like a mpv. No interior update at all
Idk why but they need too redesign this and the q5 there old and boring its like audi is giving up or something so many vehicles are better than this dinosaur even mainstream vehicles they gave me one when my x7 was getting a oil change and I absolutely hated it
Get an X5 or X7 instead.. or a Genesis GV80
Acura MDX and Lexus TX are great too. I also rly like the Audi Q8 and Porsche Cayenne but those are not as practical.
@@CarGeek360 Porsche Cayenne is the best out of them all, it’s just a lot more expensive then all those
Uh no
@@JRB41 true and even though the ride comfort isn’t as good as the other SUVs it’s still very smooth. Cayenne is def going to be the most fun though.
@@CarGeek360no the tx is the worst option in the segment.
Start all Audi reviews with: This thing is gonna cost you your 401k to keep running after the 3rd year. Audi sucks at building anything!!! PERIOD
ACC
Audi too much pastic trims
Tiny trunk
Audi needs to work on practicality with the Q7 for sure. The 3rd row is also useless.
The trunk is huge when you drop down the third row.
@@ST-oq9wx not really tbh. It’s sufficient for most people but I wouldn’t call it big by any means. If anything it’s closer to the opposite ngl.
Why not be straight up in this review and tell it like it is? This thing is way past its sell by date and looks like shit. I just sold my fully loaded 2017 Q7 for a Q8 etron. Even the 2023 Q7 is just as dated as the 2017 despite the enhancements. I loved the utility value of the car, though you’d have to be bonkers to buy this car new in 2023. Wait for the next gen (which will hopefully be more of a looker)
Even if this and MDX were the same price, I’d still take MDX ngl.
Totally agree. This car isn’t worth more than 45l brand new & it’s one of the ugliest cars I’ve literally ever seen in my life.
@@krystle8287 I disagree with that as it’s still a great car but I like the MDX more so I would def take a MDX over it unless the Q7 was substantially cheaper which would likely never happen.
The Q7 is hideous & not enjoyable to drive. Not to mention it’s completely overpriced & you pay a bunch of $ for features that do not matter at all & are completely unnecessary. I do not need a computer in my car, I already have an overly fancy phone computer I can use GPS w/in any car I’m ever in. Ugh. I can’t stand fancy upgraded cars these days. Most makes are all hideous & have way too much that’s entirely unnecessary & harder to work on. I’d much rather pay for a robust car you can actually work on yourself & not be so flashy & overpriced, not to mention these cars don’t hold their value whatsoever so if you get one, don’t expect to get much of anything back. This is a stupid investment. Unless you just have $ to burn & like ugly rides that don’t give great drives.. don’t buy this. Buy a used, basic car & you’ll be much better off in the long run. Or a van, which actually has awesome features in it designed for carrying multiple passengers rather than this one, which does not. Neither does it have good, practical cargo space. If you are tall or larger, don’t bother w/this car either bc in the case of an accident your legs & lower body stands no chance whatsoever. It doesn’t matter how great it does in safety tests when there’s NO leg room for taller people. This car is not my personal preference, if you couldn’t tell. 🤣 to me, we are going backwards w/cars just like w/people in society at large. We are regressing, not progressing. All dressed up on the outside & flashy for the world but w/no real substance to speak of & terrible to have to deal with; despite appearances. I long for the days of the muscle cars, when things were more simple, reliable, could be worked on & were beautiful to behold.
Audi is a woman car lol