Katyal and Luttig: Presidential Immunity Unconstitutional?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @gordonadams5891
    @gordonadams5891 3 місяці тому +785

    President Biden should use the immunity decision to bar all convicted felons from holding office under the Fourteenth Amendment, section 2.

  • @makalipo
    @makalipo 2 місяці тому +35

    Judge Michael Luttig & Neal Katyal - Two heroes fighting for our democracy & Rule of Law.

  • @helloartists
    @helloartists 3 місяці тому +167

    It gives me hope that Katyal and Luttig are fighting for ALL of us. I get up every morning hoping the nightmare will end.

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 2 місяці тому +2

      Oh really and what was their answer because I'm watching it now and I keep hearing Trump Trump trump Trump trump Trump trump Trump trump Trump trump. But I never hear anyone say President Biden.

    • @bobjohnson205
      @bobjohnson205 2 місяці тому +1

      @@aquariusgoldbond2697 And you never will!

    • @Denidrakes69
      @Denidrakes69 2 місяці тому

      ​@@aquariusgoldbond2697what do you mean? It's Trump's case they're talking about. If it was Biden's case they'd be discussing Biden.
      That being said, Biden is, right now, effectively King. He may choose never to use that power, but he's recently been granted it.
      That Democrats are all saying, including Biden, that the ruling is terrible, should alert you to the right side of history.

    • @Jess-kz2wn
      @Jess-kz2wn 2 місяці тому

      I have nightmares every night. The children in this country are suffering from these ruthless , selfish fascist people.

    • @kieulannguyen1193
      @kieulannguyen1193 2 місяці тому +5

      Me too. I worry more and more about the thought of Trump is back to the White House. Our children’s generation will be greatly affected. We have to make sure this felon and his cronies are near any offices. Vote Blue

  • @lindabingham6403
    @lindabingham6403 2 місяці тому +36

    Total power + absolute immunity = absolutely total disaster. Vote 💙💙💙💙💙💙💙 up and down the ballot. Protect our democracy and freedoms.

  • @peteryork3419
    @peteryork3419 3 місяці тому +510

    Keep criminals out of the White House.

    • @JamesSmith-ij8nj
      @JamesSmith-ij8nj 2 місяці тому +4

      Hunter?

    • @tc7486
      @tc7486 2 місяці тому

      If trump is the only person in America who the supremes made immune to criminal prosecution, but everyone around him, working for him, or associated with him is not immune from prosecution of crimes…then does that mean if trump as president orders anyone around or under him to help him do something criminal for which they can be held accountable, does that give anyone not named trump the ability to refuse the orders of the “commander in chief”? And does that not render him useless? Can prosecutors right now go after everyone involved in trumps current criminal indictments?

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 2 місяці тому +12

      How about off he Supreme Court.

    • @JamesSmith-ij8nj
      @JamesSmith-ij8nj 2 місяці тому +2

      @fifermcgee5971 Not being able to define what a woman is not criminal...

    • @cafewa100
      @cafewa100 2 місяці тому +20

      Trump must never again have the keys to the White House.

  • @kaceykelly7222
    @kaceykelly7222 2 місяці тому +36

    Wow! Luttig and Katyal are national treasures.

  • @shannonlevert3056
    @shannonlevert3056 3 місяці тому +118

    Judge Luttig, I want to thank you for speaking out on this matter, and for taking the time to come on to independent media channels like this one, which are proving to be an invaluable community during these troubling times.
    It’s refreshing to hear a scholar of The United States Constitution who “gets it.” There are fundamental and overarching themes-after all. The Immunity decision not only misses those, but subverts them.
    I’ll do whatever I can to support you, channels like this, and other lawyers like Mr. Katyal as we continue this fight for justice. It is of monumental importance.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому

      A dummy par excellance! No understanding of history or the fact that Obama killed a US citizen without due process via a drone. Nice one.

  • @ingeborgpadgett7079
    @ingeborgpadgett7079 2 місяці тому +25

    We are with you Thank you 🇱🇷💙🇱🇷💙💯💯💯

  • @diogenes264
    @diogenes264 3 місяці тому +141

    Thanks Kettering Foundation!

  • @carolmendez4106
    @carolmendez4106 2 місяці тому +88

    We must all speak up and stand up to DEMOCRACY. VOTE BLUE AMERICA 🇺🇸. THESE JUDGES ARE CORRUPT AND MUST REMOVED.

  • @LindaBrown-lh8pr
    @LindaBrown-lh8pr 3 місяці тому +172

    BRAVO!!!! Call it out like it is. YAY!!!!! Thank you so much. We need you to continue the battle for our democracy.👋👋👋👋

    • @leonardbresland4288
      @leonardbresland4288 3 місяці тому +12

      At trial the juries, after five minutes' deliberations, would find Trump guilty on all counts. Knowing this, the 'justices' protect the defendant?!!

    • @SheilaHidalgo-q1u
      @SheilaHidalgo-q1u 3 місяці тому +5

      Yes 🙏Please!!!

  • @CherylColpitts
    @CherylColpitts 2 місяці тому +5

    Love both of you and all who work with you. Thanks for your constitutional wisdom. Love listening to you. Please help our country.

  • @denisedecarlo9311
    @denisedecarlo9311 3 місяці тому +346

    ANYWHERE ELSE THESE TRAITORS WOULD BE ARRESTED AND STOPPED

    • @joeberta368
      @joeberta368 3 місяці тому

      In dictator ruled countries they would no longer exist - because they would be considered a threat to power. Putin has assassinated his enemies. The Saudi crown prince assassinated a threat to him. Kim of N. Korea has assassinated members of his own family. This SCOTUS is a disgrace and has opened the door to any rogue president to do the same without impunity.

    • @sheridanconsulting
      @sheridanconsulting 2 місяці тому

      Anywhere with a FUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY you mean!!!
      As opposed to a DEMOCRACY IN NANE ONLY!

    • @transformationtimenow3321
      @transformationtimenow3321 2 місяці тому

      In any other decade of American history they would've been stopped and arrested.

    • @weegeelana8523
      @weegeelana8523 2 місяці тому +15

      True - Bolsonaro of Brazil was convicted and is not allowed to run for office for 8 years(should be life)

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 2 місяці тому +10

      He would have been jailed after trying to over throw the duly elected government.

  • @v.britton4445
    @v.britton4445 2 місяці тому +41

    These two wonderful men should be on the Supreme Court themselves.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 2 місяці тому +2

      Excellent recommendation.

    • @nightlightabcd
      @nightlightabcd 2 місяці тому

      That is why the treasonous Republicans would not put them there! They are patriots for America, and the Republican can't have that! Republicans only appoint people to the SCOTUS that are unfit to be there!

    • @spinnersea9029
      @spinnersea9029 Місяць тому +1

      YES!!

  • @philapenna5428
    @philapenna5428 3 місяці тому +205

    Luttig : this decision was a constitutional abomination.
    He is a venerated R Constitutional law jurist and scholar, kids.

    • @sandrawhisler1545
      @sandrawhisler1545 3 місяці тому +22

      Thank you, Judge Luttig for telling the truth. I hope every major news organization asks you to come speak. I hope that you will do so.

    • @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr
      @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr 3 місяці тому +23

      EVERY university’s law schools NEED to have Judge Luttig, or a judge of his LEGAL caliber, as the keynote speaker for their commencement ceremony!! He speaks the absolute TRUTH about the Constitution and the Rule of Law!!

    • @BlindSquirrel425
      @BlindSquirrel425 3 місяці тому

      Thank you, legal giants, for speaking out. The people are behind you, and we are not buying corporate media’s line, jackals profiting from the destruction of democracy. Please keep speaking out, including free criticism of the justices.

    • @terryzanger7152
      @terryzanger7152 2 місяці тому +3

      And he helped make all this happen

    • @JamesSmith-ij8nj
      @JamesSmith-ij8nj 2 місяці тому +3

      Scholars don't forget the 14th has a 5th clause..

  • @kaykeelan4712
    @kaykeelan4712 2 місяці тому +34

    The Senate should issue subpoenas to the SC justices and question them up and down about this ruling and its consequences. Let them be properly shamed in front of the American public for what they have now unleashed on the country. And the next step should be that judges who respect the law around the country should get together and state that they will no longer heed what this SC says but will only obey appeal courts as their highest authority. Time to end the fiasco of giving respect to justices who despise the people and the Constitution.

  • @technologic21
    @technologic21 3 місяці тому +342

    That level of immunity is unconstitutional in all its totality. The justices allowed personal bias to tailor craft a ruling based on their favored candidate. What terrible abuse!

    • @J.M.-nb4gw
      @J.M.-nb4gw 3 місяці тому +11

      Of course they did 🤬

    • @Deraiil
      @Deraiil 2 місяці тому +8

      100%

    • @sarahkragness7138
      @sarahkragness7138 2 місяці тому

      THE CORRUPT SELL-OUT COURT...
      I HOPE THEY REINCARNATE AS SLUGS.

    • @Ont785
      @Ont785 2 місяці тому +2

      Because it’s not in totality.

    • @DuffyF56
      @DuffyF56 2 місяці тому +1

      Congress has immunity under the Speech and Debate clause EXPLICITLY written in the Constitution. Presidential immunity is Constitutional.

  • @Kefoo_
    @Kefoo_ 2 місяці тому +13

    -- *_Thank you, Kettering Foundation!_*
    "We are writing for the ages." (CORRUPTION!)

  • @geraldharvey8979
    @geraldharvey8979 3 місяці тому +256

    These two men are national treasures.

    • @MaryAnn-r1g
      @MaryAnn-r1g 3 місяці тому +12

      I hope they are passing along their knowledge to others that work with them and I hope people that work with them are taking notes

    • @Soapandwater6
      @Soapandwater6 3 місяці тому +11

      Love them both! ❤❤

    • @georgesheffield1580
      @georgesheffield1580 2 місяці тому +6

      SCOTUS is not a national treasure but a national hipocracy

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 2 місяці тому +4

      @@georgesheffield1580 National disgrace.

    • @geraldharvey8979
      @geraldharvey8979 2 місяці тому +5

      Katyal and Luttig NOT the traitors on the SCOTUS.

  • @carlbussmann7559
    @carlbussmann7559 2 місяці тому +10

    We need many more discussions of this quality for all of the American people to hear. Also we need these evidentiary hearings to allow us to be the final vote at the ballot box.

  • @stephenhenion8304
    @stephenhenion8304 3 місяці тому +65

    I recall how Judge Luttig used to support the Supreme Court.
    We Need Big Changes People!!
    Vote BLUEWAVE Democratic!!

  • @helenwood3199
    @helenwood3199 2 місяці тому +33

    POTUS' oath of office requires him to uphold the laws. No need to utilize immunity if you follow the laws of USA. If POTUS can't follow the laws, remove him from the office.

  • @williamrose2506
    @williamrose2506 3 місяці тому +126

    Judge Luttig, we can't wait for the next SC to overturn the ruling. It must be reversed immediately!

    • @DuffyF56
      @DuffyF56 2 місяці тому +1

      Yup....the guy who said the CO Ballot case against Trump was a slam dunk and LOST 9-0. Yeah, don't hold your breath.

    • @tenak7278
      @tenak7278 2 місяці тому +2

      It MUST!

    • @kjmagnon
      @kjmagnon 2 місяці тому +4

      Unfortunately the next SC could be decades away since they hold lifetime appointments.

    • @lauradawson7676
      @lauradawson7676 2 місяці тому +2

      Need to expand the court first.

    • @DuffyF56
      @DuffyF56 2 місяці тому +1

      @@lauradawson7676 Fat chance with getting the REQUIRED change to the Judiciary Act passed.

  • @janicegullett8779
    @janicegullett8779 2 місяці тому +14

    Imagine a country with ethical people like Katyal and Luttig in charge rule of law, justice, rights and equality.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому +1

      Ethical? Wow, at least when you tell a lie, you tell a big one. Unbelievable.

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 3 місяці тому +180

    "I cannot tell a lie." -George Washington.
    "I cannot tell the truth." -Donald Trump.
    "We cannot tell the difference." -The Supreme Court

    • @LunaShimmyDiva
      @LunaShimmyDiva 2 місяці тому +8

      OH SNAP!

    • @Rjsjrjsjrjsj
      @Rjsjrjsjrjsj 2 місяці тому +15

      More like "We don't care that there's a difference"
      😉

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому +3

      Maybe if you were there at J6, you'd know what you're talking about.

    • @JosephBishop-g3t
      @JosephBishop-g3t 2 місяці тому +6

      Well said

    • @JLaP
      @JLaP 2 місяці тому +8

      Well said and sadly, true

  • @l.joyhartwell3764
    @l.joyhartwell3764 2 місяці тому +4

    I trust these two great minds! Heartfelt thanks! 💌

  • @ronniew3028
    @ronniew3028 3 місяці тому +71

    This is what happens when justices can be bought. SCOTUS shouldn't be immune either. We need ethics laws NOW!!

  • @sandicianciulli3463
    @sandicianciulli3463 2 місяці тому +38

    Let's get the criminals out of the Supreme Court!

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 17 днів тому

      The issue is that a President can rig the supreme court with his chosen appointee's. And the other issue is Presidential immunity.

    • @varab6287
      @varab6287 13 днів тому

      We need a Democratic majority in Congress to change the Supreme court.

    • @varab6287
      @varab6287 13 днів тому

      741 Bipartisan National Security Leaders, Including Over 230 General and Flag Officers, Endorse Harris for President

    • @varab6287
      @varab6287 13 днів тому

      They are also not allowing evidence to be admitted as well

  • @samanthamariefreeman335
    @samanthamariefreeman335 3 місяці тому +32

    THANK YOU for holding the light and shining it in the darkness. I appreciate Neal and Michael, two of my favorite intellectuals. Great Minds!

  • @Marywashingtonbrooks
    @Marywashingtonbrooks 2 місяці тому +26

    Can this new power be totally reject by the justice department. Can the Supreme Court justices be impeached for treason?

    • @abrakkehakka1357
      @abrakkehakka1357 2 місяці тому

      It can be rejected. Would be illegal, but Biden can now pardon everyone who violates the law.
      The justices can be impeached, although not for treason. Biden could also take official actions that would removed them from their office in one way or another. Also illegal, but as it is an official act it’s now possible to do so for Biden without any consequences for him.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому

      Rejected by DOJ? Wow, that's ignorance on display!

    • @lifegood1712
      @lifegood1712 2 місяці тому

      Their coconspirators in the House and Senate would block impeachment. If there is sufficient evidence, like their unconstitutional rulings, they could be charged with a conspiracy against the United States.

  • @GrotrianSeiler
    @GrotrianSeiler 3 місяці тому +56

    Thank you for bringing some sanity to what is truly insane these days in politics. Judge Luttig is a prize to all Americans.

  • @zeemanzeeman5577
    @zeemanzeeman5577 2 місяці тому +3

    It's comforting to know that we have great people like you gentlemen who keep the torch of our democracy lit up.
    Thank you so much.

  • @gerardtimmons2053
    @gerardtimmons2053 3 місяці тому +58

    We must Never give Drumpf the opportunity to ever be in a position to ever place any judge or justice on any court in America especially our once precious SCOTUS !

  • @susankochan2860
    @susankochan2860 2 місяці тому +3

    It's truly a relief knowing these 2 powerhouse gentlemen are watching out for us, and can advise us from here.

  • @ac-twig
    @ac-twig 3 місяці тому +29

    Are there enough thinking people among the citizenry to appreciate what is spoken here? I hope this message goes far and wide.

  • @TheJaniemartinez
    @TheJaniemartinez 2 місяці тому +11

    We need a new justices that will help people and country….please Vote Blue 💙💙💙💙🙏🙏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🙏🙏

  • @patriziagiacone6637
    @patriziagiacone6637 3 місяці тому +45

    What a shame on the present SCOTUS

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 3 місяці тому +41

    The DOJ needs more Jack Smith's and less Jackoffs.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому

      We have enough lawyers who engage in fraud on the court. Don't need more.

  • @eleanorwittering3126
    @eleanorwittering3126 3 місяці тому +216

    Exceptional poignant discussion on this grave, grave, grave *6 to 3* SCOTUS decision:
    Shame on Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett.
    Shame, shame, shame, shame, shame, shame!

    • @pokey5736
      @pokey5736 3 місяці тому +27

      Time to pack the Court, term limits and oversight.

    • @chopsjazz1
      @chopsjazz1 3 місяці тому

      Those six must be removed and tried for crimes against the constitution: Treason.

    • @Madfunkids
      @Madfunkids 3 місяці тому +25

      ​@@pokey5736
      Yes, unpack this Federalist court & restore checks and balances with non-partisan justices.

    • @KathrynTanner-t8f
      @KathrynTanner-t8f 3 місяці тому +27

      "The Supreme Court has roiled the nation." That's absolutely the way to put it, Judge Luttig. Thanks for speaking out on behalf of the Constitution.

    • @sharonwalberg5438
      @sharonwalberg5438 3 місяці тому

      Agreed! Since Thomas and Alito didn't recuse themselves and the 6 didn't keep their oath to the Constitution , the ruling should be void! Shows they don't care about the Constitution , America or Americans, but bowing down to a traitor and convicted Felon! A disgrace!

  • @elainealbert6124
    @elainealbert6124 2 місяці тому +6

    Something needs to be done about this before it’s too late!!!!! We need action!!!’

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 3 місяці тому +213

    The United States Supreme Court does not possess the authority to create and pass illegal rulings. 'A CRIME CAN NEVER BE AN OFFICIAL ACT!!!'

    • @richardmiller341
      @richardmiller341 2 місяці тому +14

      Nor is a coup d'etat

    • @cathygenevie
      @cathygenevie 2 місяці тому +7

      But yet, here we are! Maddening!

    • @DuffyF56
      @DuffyF56 2 місяці тому

      They did no such thing LIAR. They decided a case brought to them and the legal issues raised.

    • @BunnEFartz
      @BunnEFartz 2 місяці тому

      @@DuffyF56 YOU are a BOLD FACED LIAR. Show me where this decision was Constitutionally based or even based in US Federal Law? I'll wait right here. This should be hilarious.

    • @XX-qd6ke
      @XX-qd6ke 2 місяці тому

      @DuffyF56 --- You don't even know, what you don't know there...Duff. You complete a sentence at the level of a fifth grader. I suggest that you possibly do a bit of research and become a little better informed...because presently, you're a fool...

  • @elainealbert6124
    @elainealbert6124 2 місяці тому +12

    Ludwick and Neal do something about this!! Impeach them all!! This is not American!

    • @kennethcurtis1856
      @kennethcurtis1856 6 днів тому

      You understand that Katyal and Luttig can't do squat, right. They can't impeach their granny's if they wanted.

  • @dianaanderson2359
    @dianaanderson2359 3 місяці тому +23

    So enlightening to listen to these wonderful scholars and constitutional experts. I fear for America.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому

      Katyal is a class A joke and the other an "expert"? Wow, what a load! Your ignorance of law and history is telling.

  • @patriciafrye1713
    @patriciafrye1713 2 місяці тому +8

    Absolutely. These experts should be getting much greater visibility, especially now, when the outcomes are so vital!

  • @JohnDanenbarger
    @JohnDanenbarger 3 місяці тому +88

    Add 5 judges before Trump can have the possibility. We are wasting time.

    • @eleanorwittering3126
      @eleanorwittering3126 3 місяці тому +6

      @@JohnDanenbarger yes! We have wasted so much time… Exactly exactly what Trump wanted!

    • @LRCW1
      @LRCW1 3 місяці тому

      ​@@eleanorwittering3126
      Mr. High Power Rifle & Mrs. Sniper would like to have a meeting with the SC justices & Mr. Trump.

    • @argentnexus7129
      @argentnexus7129 3 місяці тому +1

      Adding justices is not the answer. Not being a weak President and understanding and enforcing the dictates and power of the Constitution would.

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 3 місяці тому +2

      We sure are wasting time. In President Biden has the power and the authority right now to put more justices on the supreme Court. But will you do it it's our job to rally around our new king.#HailKingBiden ♒♒🪐🪐💜💜

    • @Soapandwater6
      @Soapandwater6 2 місяці тому

      Should have already been done.

  • @BluePhoenixFireandIce
    @BluePhoenixFireandIce 2 місяці тому +99

    Biden must act quickly and with the speed of lightning to stop Trump. PERIOD 💯

    • @michaelmorris4515
      @michaelmorris4515 2 місяці тому +4

      He won't. He's our Neville Chamberlain in the face of our generation's Adolf Hitler.

    • @bobjohnson205
      @bobjohnson205 2 місяці тому +3

      Make a call to Navy Seal Team 6?

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому

      Who is this clown? Biden is not even aware of his personal activities and he must "act quickly"?? Pathetic!

    • @SusanHMcIntyre
      @SusanHMcIntyre 2 місяці тому

      And he must stop the SC due to having a criminal on it v

    • @raoulh.4440
      @raoulh.4440 28 днів тому +1

      Biden doesn’t act quickly.

  • @JamesGraham-f7y
    @JamesGraham-f7y 3 місяці тому +138

    Since when does MAGA care about the Constitution?

    • @GrotrianSeiler
      @GrotrianSeiler 3 місяці тому +14

      Exactly. To them, it’s just an impediment.

    • @letsRegulateSociopaths
      @letsRegulateSociopaths 3 місяці тому

      They are FULLY DEDICATED and have been working to enact a CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION to rewrite the US Constitution, look it up. THAT is the END GAME HERE.

    • @ollie6004
      @ollie6004 2 місяці тому +7

      If Trump gets back in there will be no longer a Constitution.

    • @angie-gz4yg
      @angie-gz4yg 2 місяці тому

      they only "care" when they demand, scream, and holler that Dems follow the law

    • @larrysmith8994
      @larrysmith8994 2 місяці тому +2

      The Only one they care about is the 2nd Amendment....the other portions of it NOPE!

  • @carolrobinson2344
    @carolrobinson2344 2 місяці тому +6

    It is so problematic we have a judicial committee who can and should act on behalf of the American ppl yet they haven't.

  • @hiltonturner9852
    @hiltonturner9852 3 місяці тому +88

    It's time to amend the Constitution to: 1) explicitly state that the president does not have absolute immunity for breaking the law while in office, 2) term-limit all justices of the supreme court to 18 years on the bench, 3) make supreme court justices conform to a code of conduct as all article III judges, and 4) create a commission made-up of senior federal judges with the authority to sanction any article III justice or judge who violates the code of conduct.

    • @shannonlevert3056
      @shannonlevert3056 3 місяці тому +10

      We assume competency and integrity. But we can’t do that. I guess we have to spell it out.

    • @jim0311
      @jim0311 3 місяці тому +7

      Wouldn't that be something to see.. but Republicans stand in the way

    • @CurtOntheRadio
      @CurtOntheRadio 3 місяці тому

      @@jim0311 Voters stand in the way?

    • @paulaartandmusic4412
      @paulaartandmusic4412 3 місяці тому +1

      Correct!

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 2 місяці тому

      Who's going to do that. The supreme Court they are the ones that gave the president of the new founded powers.#HailKingBiden ♒♒🪐🪐💜💜

  • @deviritter5232
    @deviritter5232 2 місяці тому +4

    Thank you, gentlemen, for your scholarship.

  • @elidaenriquez3737
    @elidaenriquez3737 3 місяці тому +32

    This is totally disturbing that a president can get away with breaking the law and just say it's official act. We can no longer say no one is above the law.

  • @chetcalhoun613
    @chetcalhoun613 2 місяці тому +6

    Very good video! Than you all! Justice must prevail against this wannabe dictator!

  • @GrotrianSeiler
    @GrotrianSeiler 3 місяці тому +67

    PROJECT 2025 WOULD BE THE END OF OUR COUNTRY. AND WE HAVE LOST THE SUPPORT OF OUR SUPREME COURT. OUR COUNTRY IS IN DEEP TROUBLE.

    • @bernicehenson5210
      @bernicehenson5210 2 місяці тому +1

      There won't be anymore Supreme Court if Trump get voted in. They can kiss their position and their jobs gone. Because if Trump won he would become a want to be dictator and have control over all ruling and orders. They would no longer be needed.

  • @diannadima7082
    @diannadima7082 2 місяці тому +3

    We the Jury demand that we know all the evidence. This is our America, our vote needs to be unblindfolded.

  • @mpaczkow
    @mpaczkow 3 місяці тому +71

    There has never been an impeachment of a Supreme Court justice as precedence, but since SCOTUS is hell bend on removing precedence, so I am all for impeachment of a justice starting with Thomas. I would like to see a financial probe of all justices by the IRS. Most of us who worked in companies have more constraints on taking gifts than these justices.

    • @courtneybrubaker9738
      @courtneybrubaker9738 3 місяці тому +3

      Couldn’t Biden do that now?

    • @XX-qd6ke
      @XX-qd6ke 2 місяці тому

      There has been one justice impeached...however he was not convicted (Justice Samuel Chase in 1805.)

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 2 місяці тому +6

      Thomas and Ailto should be impeached as in all sincerity they should have recused themselves due to the fact that both of their wives were involved with the insurrection.

    • @nalou6933
      @nalou6933 2 місяці тому +2

      The MAGA ruled House of Representatives would never impeach one of their own on the court.

    • @kieulannguyen1193
      @kieulannguyen1193 2 місяці тому +1

      I was once an employee for DHS, every year we had to take Ethic training and I wonder if any of these judges ever take this training? I remembered that I could not even receive any gift more than 10 dollars. 😂 but Thomas for years took in millions of dollars and nobody said anything. Geez.. We need to have applied ethics to these judges and all official.

  • @shannon4830
    @shannon4830 2 місяці тому +5

    These rulings must be overruled NOW!

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому

      NO understanding of the Constitution or how changes are made. Really unbelievable.

  • @bobbieannhowell7
    @bobbieannhowell7 3 місяці тому +208

    We do not have to accept or abide by this illegal rulings, If one person is above the law then we all are above the law.

    • @alexperkins8433
      @alexperkins8433 3 місяці тому

      uh we do if those with authority do NOthing heres lookin at you mgarland biden wtf scotus are corrupt bought & paid for follow the $ yeah its so official to pay off your porn star mistress for america ridiculous biden should throw all of scotus in gitmo since he has immunity

    • @Cookie-op2pq
      @Cookie-op2pq 3 місяці тому +12

      This outcome leads to total anarchy on the right with guns for all

    • @jim0311
      @jim0311 3 місяці тому +2

      ​@@Cookie-op2pqso be it

    • @StephenLewisful
      @StephenLewisful 3 місяці тому +16

      I would say 'If one person is above the law then there is no rule of law' rather than 'We're all above the law' but it amounts to the same crock of shit at the end of the day.

    • @courtneybrubaker9738
      @courtneybrubaker9738 3 місяці тому +11

      Unfortunately that’s not how it works. You need to have wealth,
      power and connections, be one of the untouchables then you are
      above the law.

  • @charlierubenstein2886
    @charlierubenstein2886 2 місяці тому +26

    No court will save us now
    Vote blue to save the Republic

  • @HowievYT
    @HowievYT 3 місяці тому +34

    SCOTUS has thrown down the gauntlet of revolution.

    • @StephenLewisful
      @StephenLewisful 3 місяці тому +4

      They've sure put the rubber stamp of approval on it.

    • @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr
      @CarolEdmonds-pk7hr 3 місяці тому

      tRump only has to claim whatever he does was an “official “ act and the depraved MAGA cult at every level of government will trip over one another to give him their seal of approval!

  • @imirim
    @imirim 2 місяці тому +10

    Why even have an oath of office for the President. Imagine what a joke it would be for Trump to win and have Roberts administer the oath to Trump.

    • @jeancobos9912
      @jeancobos9912 2 місяці тому +1

      We are a laughing mess to all other countries. God help us.

    • @imirim
      @imirim 2 місяці тому

      @jeancobos9912 I moved to Portugal last month. I try not to read or watch the US news but when I do it looks even worse from here

  • @mikeatgoogle501
    @mikeatgoogle501 3 місяці тому +239

    BIDEN NEEDS TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE DICTATOR!!!

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 3 місяці тому +15

      And he has the power and authority to do that right now through the presidential act with immunity. He could disembowel heritage foundation right now. And the 2025 project.

    • @michaeljohnangel6359
      @michaeljohnangel6359 2 місяці тому +6

      @@aquariusgoldbond2697 The fact of Biden's acting nicey-nicey rather than going all out and saving America makes me wonder if he's really strong enough to lead the country.

    • @hammill444
      @hammill444 2 місяці тому

      @@michaeljohnangel6359Oh stop already. Biden would never step outside of the bounds of traditional action. He would never even go so far as to bend the law. Not now.not ever. He’s a strict traditionalist who believes in the institutions-- corrupt as they are. It has nothing to strength. The only ones who can save America are its voters.

    • @jerryvalet569
      @jerryvalet569 2 місяці тому +4

      @@michaeljohnangel6359 And your solution would be . .. .?

    • @RichardBrady-yc7he
      @RichardBrady-yc7he 2 місяці тому

      The new rules brought forth are unconstitutional. To change or amend the constitution is not the role of the court. It is Congresses role to change the laws. Therefore these new rules by the Supreme Court are illegal.

  • @pamkocinski
    @pamkocinski 2 місяці тому +23

    If Trump getsin there will no need for a Supreme Court.

  • @dannywha8670
    @dannywha8670 3 місяці тому +46

    If everything a president does is an official act then he is a king.

    • @aquariusgoldbond2697
      @aquariusgoldbond2697 3 місяці тому

      Yes because the supreme Court gave us our first king. King Biden. And asking he could strip any immunity from Trump right now. Disembowel heritage foundation. Reinstate voting rights. Pack the court.. #HailKingBiden ♒♒🪐🪐💜💜

    • @Soapandwater6
      @Soapandwater6 2 місяці тому +3

      Exactly what they want: King Trump.

    • @unbehagen686
      @unbehagen686 2 місяці тому

      @@dannywha8670 Hopefully President Biden will make sure Traitor Insurrectionist Trump Walks the Plank before November 5 2024 Potus Election to SAVE The United States Constitution, The United States Constitutional Republic and The Rule of Law from Domestic Enemy/Terrorist Trump and Terrorist Trump's Terrorist Co Conspirators.
      🦈🇺🇲⚖️🇺🇲🦈

    • @LunaShimmyDiva
      @LunaShimmyDiva 2 місяці тому

      @@Soapandwater6I’d say exactly what they NEED. 45’s racking up suits n judgements he NEEDS to get out from under. Any president NEEDING presidential immunity has lots to hide…enough that they’ll entirely upend constitution and rule of law!

  • @yettaloyd507
    @yettaloyd507 2 місяці тому +2

    Than you please continue to speak up to save our constitution and country ❤

  • @XX-qd6ke
    @XX-qd6ke 3 місяці тому +35

    "It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error."
    -Robert H. Jackson, US Supreme Court Justice
    (Communications Association v. Douds, May 1950)

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 17 днів тому

      So why a gazillion lawyer's?

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 17 днів тому

      In America it's the reverse. 😢

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 17 днів тому

      Law's are only viable, if enforced equally.

  • @sandrapisarski6597
    @sandrapisarski6597 22 дні тому +2

    I love Neil and Judge Luttig! Thank you guys for sharing your wisdom!

  • @leelevy9955
    @leelevy9955 3 місяці тому +33

    You can't fight evil with logic.

    • @Cat-bg2ge
      @Cat-bg2ge 17 днів тому

      You can fight evil with logic.

  • @user-vk7cp1op9p
    @user-vk7cp1op9p 2 місяці тому +3

    That court has no right to make that ruling. I am one of the people, and this court shows no respect and must be removed. DUMP THIS COURT! So, it comes down to can we fix this?

  • @Valeriafrances13
    @Valeriafrances13 3 місяці тому +427

    Why can’t we arrest the justices for treason

    • @georgieippolito9924
      @georgieippolito9924 3 місяці тому +50

      and obstruction of justice

    • @StopWhining491
      @StopWhining491 3 місяці тому +59

      SCOTUS justices are not gods, and T***p is not a king.

    • @V0lk
      @V0lk 3 місяці тому +45

      Biden should test this theory.

    • @dominique217
      @dominique217 3 місяці тому

      They can be impeached as I understand, but as we've all seen, that process is broken, as is the branch of government that manages it.

    • @jim0311
      @jim0311 3 місяці тому +23

      ​@@V0lkhe's got immunity

  • @just-dontbs
    @just-dontbs 2 місяці тому +5

    Does SCOTUS has immunity on corruption charges?

  • @betticaroltaylor9681
    @betticaroltaylor9681 3 місяці тому +12

    thank you, thank you, thank yuu for bringing this to the American people and forcing us to LOOK AT IT. . May we be brave enough to insist on an immediate remedy and may we be wise enough as a country to provide the tools to correct the wrong direction of this despicable Roberts court..

  • @kellyhorton5551
    @kellyhorton5551 2 місяці тому +1

    Yes! Thank you both for your service to America and our democracy

  • @maryalicecoleman4661
    @maryalicecoleman4661 3 місяці тому +26

    Please help me understand how we can dismiss this ruling. It must be overturned. We The People do not accept this!

    • @elenalatici9568
      @elenalatici9568 2 місяці тому +1

      Then vote. SCROTUS is literally on the ballot in November.
      If you don't vote 💙 In November snd take 3 non-voters with you, you will never be able to vote again for anything on any level.

    • @phil20_20
      @phil20_20 2 місяці тому +1

      New Justices

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 2 місяці тому

      Vote blue all the way down the ticket.

  • @peggiegendall
    @peggiegendall Місяць тому +1

    Thank you Kettering Foundation for helping to save Democracy. I also on my knees to thank you both Neal Katyal and J. Michael Luttig

  • @JSees
    @JSees 3 місяці тому +15

    No one is stating what is underlying this....this is COUP!

  • @SueKennedy-nb1gh
    @SueKennedy-nb1gh 25 днів тому +2

    Greetings from 🇨🇦..i love how Judge Luttig speaks...Mr Kaytel should in my opinion be on the SCOTUS...he speaks the same as Judge Luttig...a concerned Canadian...and afraid ..bless both ur hearts...pls keep up ur democracy for all...never give up..i love the U.S. ...we are neighbors..bless all.❤❤❤

  • @dsantamaria713
    @dsantamaria713 3 місяці тому +28

    Why, in God's name,
    don't we have Men and Women like this on the Supreme Court????
    🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷🤷

    • @courtneybrubaker9738
      @courtneybrubaker9738 3 місяці тому +5

      Ask Mitch McConnell

    • @nalou6933
      @nalou6933 2 місяці тому +2

      ​@courtneybrubaker9738 Yes, he puts GOP judges on the Court that have almost as much integrity as he does. /s

    • @pamciekanowski2472
      @pamciekanowski2472 2 місяці тому +1

      I had wonder this for years and years..

    • @phil20_20
      @phil20_20 2 місяці тому +2

      Because they are appointed by politicians.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 2 місяці тому

      @@nalou6933 Ask Leonard Leo, he appears to be the czar behind all republican appointees. He has the final say.

  • @Bob4golf1
    @Bob4golf1 2 місяці тому +3

    I agree with Judge Luttig completely! As a functioning democracy it seems outlandish that 9 people (actually 5) can make rules that everyone has to follow. It's not only anti-democratic, it ridiculous!

  • @BlindSquirrel425
    @BlindSquirrel425 3 місяці тому +8

    Thank you again. Excellent discussion. 🙏🇺🇸🦅🦅

  • @sallyhausken2307
    @sallyhausken2307 3 місяці тому +2

    Thank you so much for presenting this. It gives us a little forecast of laws to come re: SCOTUS.

  • @BlindSquirrel425
    @BlindSquirrel425 3 місяці тому +16

    Yes, your honor, you speak the truth. The majority decided the outcome and then tortured the law, ignored the facts of the case before them, and fantasized about unlikely future scenarios. Terrible practice for any lawyer or judge.

  • @laurielyon3481
    @laurielyon3481 2 місяці тому +2

    Excellent discussion! Thank you Neil Katyal & Judge Littig for your service to our nation, and for your expert opinions in this critical ruling by Supreme Court.

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому

      Another know-nothing - man alive - ZERO critical thinking skills and reading needed to understand the topic. Pathetic.

  • @frankbustamante3479
    @frankbustamante3479 3 місяці тому +37

    Supreme Court counsel and judge Cannon should be disbarred and remove the immunity issue, no one is above the law.
    This is crazy Trump committed to many crimes against America, he needs to be punished.

  • @SueKennedy-nb1gh
    @SueKennedy-nb1gh Місяць тому +2

    Niel and judge have got to get gether to fight this scotus...I'm Canadian but God...the whole world is counting on you...I know both ur heads together will stop the scotus..from being rough...please stop them...Canadians are relying on you both...❤❤❤❤

  • @ProfJoseph4855
    @ProfJoseph4855 3 місяці тому +12

    An outstanding report! 👍

  • @DanielLe-ko7eg
    @DanielLe-ko7eg 2 місяці тому +2

    These two Constitution giants should take this on tour and speak about this issue from college campuses to town halls every where possible.

    • @fifermcgee5971
      @fifermcgee5971 2 місяці тому

      They should be sitting on the Supreme Court,

  • @intuitknit
    @intuitknit 3 місяці тому +28

    If insurrection has been deemed an official act by a president, what is the fate of the election process at all?

    • @TheRealResume
      @TheRealResume 2 місяці тому

      Too bad you weren't there on J6 and did not witness what really went on. Really stupid!

  • @StephenHooper-p1i
    @StephenHooper-p1i 2 місяці тому +3

    Dred Scott is a parlor game compared to Trump v. United States. I've got to ask you, Neal, how could you possibly have ANY respect for Roberts, never mind "a great deal of respect" for him? He plainly lied during his confirmation when he stated under oath that "no man is above the law, not even the president." He also lied about precedent, he lied about judicial restraint, and he lied with that BS "I'm just an umpire." Judge Luttig is right, the decision is unconstitutional. Not even mentioned is the fact that by this ruling, the Supreme Court has invalidated the impeachment clause. They have just immunized the president of the United States against "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors."

  • @BlindSquirrel425
    @BlindSquirrel425 3 місяці тому +10

    Nixon’s pronouncement about presidential power has been canonized (no pun intended).

  • @julieproctor6039
    @julieproctor6039 2 місяці тому +3

    The American people have the need and the right to see all the evidence before another election

  • @NA_49erFan
    @NA_49erFan 3 місяці тому +16

    I love how the supreme Court gives the power to the president to be king and then doesn't even acknowledge the first thing the king will usually do is get rid of the Court

    • @pennybyrd1058
      @pennybyrd1058 3 місяці тому +3

      True. Why would a President even need the court any longer? All the President has to do now is label everything 'official.'

    • @sgm7013
      @sgm7013 3 місяці тому +1

      They have turned themselves into the Russian Supreme Court.

    • @Soapandwater6
      @Soapandwater6 2 місяці тому +1

      Very short-sighted of them.

  • @cathypreston1095
    @cathypreston1095 2 місяці тому +1

    Thank you gentlemen. Heaven help us.

  • @StevenTorrey
    @StevenTorrey 3 місяці тому +14

    In the presence of a crime, there is no distinction between "Official Acts" & "Unofficial Acts"..... It was a piece of silliness the way the Court ruled. "Staging a coup" is a crime, there is no way around that and there is no way defend that as an "Official Act".

  • @paulpotter7188
    @paulpotter7188 2 місяці тому +1

    So many intelligent and experienced people needed to counter the ridiculous actions of an unhinged man and his very foolish supporters. Thank you for your lifetime of commitment to justice and patriotism.

  • @revaatkinson2897
    @revaatkinson2897 3 місяці тому +18

    Why can't the justices and all involved in going against the U.S. and we the people be charged and held accountable for their wrong doings towards our fine Country and we the people

    • @CurtOntheRadio
      @CurtOntheRadio 3 місяці тому

      Agreed. My view is round them all up and charge and jail them now. If that doesn't happen now it will happen in reverse in January, under Trump (What does anyone think will happen to Jack Smith, Garland, Cheney, Pelosi, Clinton, Katyal, Luttig, Milley, MSNBC, the Times etc etc?) And the US will be gone.
      An immoral act can be moral, such as killing enemy soldiers in war, assassinating Hitler, etc. The moral difference in this case is whether to save America or destroy it. Refusing to act appropriately is understandable but is, in fact, cowardice and betrayal. Refusing to act is to betray the Constitution - action is justified because its intent is to defend the constitution - from domestic enemies.

  • @summerstorm508
    @summerstorm508 11 днів тому

    Deepest Respect for Neal Katyal & Michael Luttig … Thank you for sharing your vast knowledge in this era of “who do we trust”?!?
    🕊️💙⚖️ … ⚖️?!?

  • @williamrose2506
    @williamrose2506 3 місяці тому +13

    Rest assured that Putin and Bin Salman are celebrating this decision by the SC.

  • @Stuart68505
    @Stuart68505 2 місяці тому +1

    Thanks these insights are very helpful. There is hope for the rule of law to be preserved in spite of the Supreme Court..

  • @jim0311
    @jim0311 3 місяці тому +11

    With majorities in the House and Senate laws must be passed that make the immunity ruling unenforceable.😊

    • @angie-gz4yg
      @angie-gz4yg 2 місяці тому

      expand the Supreme court

  • @SueKennedy-nb1gh
    @SueKennedy-nb1gh Місяць тому +2

    Judge letting sir... and Niel...pls..please don't give up...I listen to all your media input as well as CNN and MSNBC...please keep fighting the scotus with all u got and then some...u guys are the best to save Amricans and Canada🎉🎉❤❤
    I'm counting on you to hold them all accountable for there actions...praying tons!❤❤❤