Wow. Packs 500 missiles but this video is saying it is useless on the modern battlespace. That would depend on tactics and missile capabilities. Never underestimate your enemy.
Nothing holds 500 missiles of anything, unless they're Este's Rocket kits, you know the ones made out of cardboard tubing and you shove the solid fuel model engines in! Not to mention "allegedly" hypersonic missiles...that Russia has ZERO OF! Iskander/Kinzhal missiles are NOT hypersonics! They are only hyperson8c outside the atmosphere and don't maneuver for shit....EVEN THE CHINESE SAID SO...that's why they don't use them...plus ....Russia doesn't have 500 of any type of missile....dumb Bombs maybe. You shouldn't underestimate an enemy...you shouldn't believe everything an enemy says...when they are known for being the WORLDS MOST FULL OF SHIT COUNTRY/MILITARY IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND! WHAT happened to their Flagship "Moskva" "American Carrier Killer" "Best Ship in the World"..?...two missiles fired at it, SUNK! U.S.S. Carney has 51 anti-ship missiles, ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and drones fired at it and 51 FLAWLESS INTERCEPTIONS!!!....Super high tech missiles....from a country with no carriers, no stealth aircraft, no Sarmat, no T-14's, no G.P.S.,(unless they pirate ours), lost the black sea fleet to a country with no Navy, no Air Superiority over a country with no Air Force, and have been locked in a stalemate fight for 3 years with the #56th ranked military....that adversary...?...the people taking weapons and soldiers from Iran and North Korea...ok guys.
The ship 🚢 has not gone to sea trail yet, and no one outside Russia knows what it is going to like and how it is going to perform, but u are already writing it off. U must be GOD, know all
Note that the Kirov class guided-missiles cruiser and the subject of discussion Nakhimov missiles cruiser with its size and displacement of 28 thousand tons and 500 various types of missile system, needs a crew of 727 people, while the arleigh burke class (DDGs) with its smaller size and displacement of 8500 tons and 96 VLS systems complementing a crew of 323, here the Russian combat ship is considered better because it provides 5 times the amount of firepower with only twice the manpower, not to mention other combat support assets, and force multiplier elements, from easy attaching extra auxiliary fighting stations, the armor thickness of the hull, to the nuclear operated the help facilitate the operational flexibility of combat the vessel... but one of the weaknesses of the Kirov class guided-missiles cruiser is its size and with it, its large radar cross-section not to mention the infrared signature in addition to the electro-magnetic emissions from all those mounted antennas and data links sensors, making it an easy target for detection, although the size of the ship facilitates equipping it with more electronic warfare systems for ECM/ECCM/ESM, than its arleigh burke class counterpart, although generally speaking the cruiser is larger than the destroyers, but for the navy of what is very temporarily called the united states of america even the ticonderoga class missiles cruiser, with its almost 10000 tons displacement, and 128 VLS systems complemented 330 crew members, while the Kirov class guided-missiles cruiser with almost 3 time displacement weight needed only 710 crew members... worth noting other downsides for the Kirov class single vessel is brown/red painting of the ship surface, its make it easier to be distinguished from longer ranges either from the air or the space, for the Soviet navy with their huge fleet, all their vessels surface were painted in brown/red color this make it easy to be counted from the space... I think the strong point for arleigh burke class guided missiles destroyers is by its smaller size and lower profile, making it difficult targets to discover from longer ranges considering the curve of earth, beside the to help enhance its speed and maneuverability... I believe that in the context of a comprehensive war with the nato, its operational capabilities and tactical combat capabilities promoting the expanding the spectrum of its operational and strategic utilization or employments in the open seas and oceans or the blue and dark waters conducting strikes with conventional and non-conventional weapons It can be resupplied by shadow commercial vessels, but with the huge developments in Space, air and sea reconnaissance and surveillance electro-optical and electronic capabilities, compared to World War II, I believe that its fate will not different from the fate of the nasty germans bismarck battleship and the Japanese Yamato and Musashi capital battleships...
This is an almost forty year old ship. It was laid up and barely maintained for decades. It is "modernized" since 2015 on a shoestring budget amid constant delays. It is a prestige project, the real military value is fairly questionable. By the way, any Ticonderoga class cruiser can carry 488 missiles...It depends on the loadout 🙂.
By observing the Chinese, who adopted the best practises of both Eastern and Western doctrine, it is far better to build multirole cruiser size ships than building single purpose one like the Kirovs, Slavas, or the Zumwalts. An upgraded Kirov is still not to be underestimated as it still boast the best fire power of any surface combatant except for supercarriers, at least on paper.
The video is meant to demotivate Russian achievements. But as usual it will prove otherwise, as inbattle of Ukraine. Zircon hypersonic missile has performed extremely well in battle so as other missiles
Nice piece of a floating scrap :-) Thanks for the video. Are those Zirkons really able to reach hypersonic speeds if their carrier is not moving Mach 3, please?
Obviously You're not happy that your so called great military has no hypersonic missiles and Russia does.Ask the Ukrainians if. Russian hypersonic weapons work and then your ignorance will be cleared.
Following this logic, aircraft carrier is even bigger white elephant. If ballistic missile like Oreshnik can hit it, it would be turned onto sieve. However, USA heavily rely on aircraft carriers which are hart and soul of their blue water navy.
Thumbs up for a great article on a ship class that was previously unknown to me...a nuclear powered 'BattleCruiser'. Given how badly the Ukraine war has stretched Russia's budget, continuing with the Nakhimov's outfitting seems like a functionally useless enterprise. This is especially true given that the Nakhimov is stationed in the far north Atlantic, and Montreux convention explicitly bans entry/exit to/from the Black sea during military conflicts. (Besides, it would be a sitting duck passing through the Turkish straits
This guy is an idiot, comparing Kirov class with Burke class. The burke has only one Vulcan cannon, 96 cells, one searam launchers. Meanwhile the Kirov has 326 cells with missile like S-300F, OSA, Igla, Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks, and it has 4 Pantsir Missile Gun system. The Kirov is bigger, better and powerful than any ships in the us navy. This things were made to destroy US fleets.
Se essa coisa receber defesas aéreas e submarinas adequadas pode fornecer o mesmo poder de fogo de um strik grup Américo inteiro 2 ticonderoga e 3 arliburk vôo 3, zircon teve dois lançamentos com zero interceptação,onix e kalibrir são mísseis de cruzeiro com alcance de 1200 km e vejo uma vez por semana esses mísseis sendo lançados e atingindo alvos na Ucrânia
Lleva 512 misiles AA, 64 48N6 y/o 40N6, con 250 y 380 km de alcance respectivamente, operados por el sistema S-400 en su versión naval, 256 misiles de la familia 9M96, con alcances que van desde los 80 a los 120 km, en 8x8 VLS, 4 misiles por celda, operados con el sistema Poliment -Redut ( AEGIS ruso y S-350),192 misiles Hermes-K, 32 por cada uno de los 6 CIWs Palma. Para la ASW, lleva un RBU-12000 con 40 cohetes-bombas de profundidad y 2 RBU-1000 con 36 municiones cada uno, un sistema Packet-NK con 40 municiones, entre torpedos convencionales, de supercavitación, misiles-torpedos y torpedos antitorpedos, usando 10 tubos de lanzamiento y 2 helicópteros ASW Ka-28, con varios torpedos ligeros y sus propios sonares, el buque cuenta con 2 sonares Sarya, uno en el bulbo de proa y otro más atrás y un sonar de arrastre Minotaur en popa.
1 - The naval of USA is a mith, never found itself against any REAL ENEMY 2 - USA has today only 4 peers decks for construction 3 - USA its not in any way, shape or form the best naval around the world, Russia has the best subs all around, and they have more subs than USA has, more modern, with the most silent subs, with the most advanced weapons and defense systems 4 - Russia has the most sophisticated torpedos all around, the most advanced hypersonic missiles in the world, the most advanced air defense systems in land and navy 5 - China has more ships and shipyards constructing non stop more ships - you can say whatever you want, people in USA DOES NOT GO TO army anymore, the woke generation took USA, just gays, and women rules USA NOW.. 6 - USA its in a trap full of imigrants entering USA BY MILLIONS every eyer, you will be like france, more africans and muslins in France than french citizens, this is happening right now in USA. With all that in mid, USA HAS 35 TRILLIONS IN DEBT, no industry, sooner enough you will be solved.
The class Arleigh Burke in a accident in black sea 10ago,one russian plane counterac all electronic system off the ship,this is the really ,no the magazine news off all days in the tv,the Zircon missile is bad weapon???which the reason??the marketing???
Ele precisa de uma escolta de navios menores, e que grande navio não precisa, não ha lutas 1 contra 1 nunca houveram lutas 1 contra 1 , se ele tiver a cobertura necessária seus 500 mísseis ja são o suficiente para suturar toda uma frota de navios, mas ele e antigo e não porta o ápice da tecnologia como radares de nitreto de gálio ou tecnologia stelf
500 MISSILES...?....500 MISSILES...?...are Russians calling Rats..."missiles" now??...is that the thing.?...like when tha T-72 started up and those "missiles" were flying out of the exhaust and scampering all over the barn it was in and the soldiers were trying to stomp on those "missiles" as they scurried off. Like the "Tom and Missile" Cartoon show when we were kids.
592 misiles, sin contar los misiles-torpedos del sistema Packet-NK y los de los helicópteros Ka-28 (2). 256 misiles 9M96 y versiones, en 8x8 VLS, 4 misiles por celda, 64 misiles 48N6 y/o 40N6 en otras 8x8 VLS, 192 misiles Hermes-K, 32x6 CIWs Palma y 80 misiles superficie-superficie, Onix, Kalibre y/o Zircón.
Whenever I listen to or watch a price of Russian or Chinese military technology, the first thing I do is check to see who is delivering it. It’s almost always immediately apparent whether or not the presenter is viewing the subject through the American lens America is in the habit of reinforcing its own propaganda and even worse actually believing it In doing so it has presented us with more than 20 years of underestimation of the capabilities of any other country and always presenting itself as technologically superior It isn’t al- American gear is backwards. The country is broke. It’s not developing any new technologies and those that it does develop rob the American taxpayer blind, the classic example being the F 35 which is a piece of massively overpricedand and completely untested junk. Russians on the other hand tend to build something with the long-term in mind rather than relying on its taxpayers to fund every new brain spasm created by the puffins in the Pentagon Many of Russia’s aircraft began their development during the days of the union after which there was a hiatus before Putin was able to get the country back under control But the US prefers to maintain the narrative of the old soviet Union as a gas station with nukes and everything else is backward because it is convenient to do so and to keep its own population and anybody else who will listen completely misinformed. The truth however is that all of the Western technology has been tested in Ukraine and found wanting and is piled up as junk in Ukrainian or as trophies in Moscow And while the US seems to care about how it is perceived in the world, Russia doesn’t worry about the opinions of others but just gets on with it and lets the proof be seen in the pudding. Besides, if nothing else, Russia bills, wonderful looking ships, Which aesthetically blow the American creations out of the water as far as elegant of design is concerned.
I don't agree with this guy Assessment at all ! This Ship is a Beast !!!! 500 Missiles on Board and Hypersonic- Onix and Zircons and KH s !!!!! Obviosity will be Cruisers along too for more protectional and some Nuclear Submarines too ! Its a Absolute Beast of the seas ! Go Russia !
Russia is sending out it's latest submarine :)> ... noting they have learned almost nothing from the Ukraine war. They should have added 40MM Bofors guns amidships to deal with drone boats. their anti-cruise missile guns amidships may do nothing. But then, almost nobody learns anything from even recent history.
This video is typical analysis of Russian enemy. This Battelcruiser Admiral Nakhimov is Most powerful ship on planet EVER BUILT. Yet this video is TALKING BS about it. As i Said what do you except from Russian enemy to say anything but BS. Yet after reading comments about this biased video I've seen lots of absurd and ignorant comments that are beyond believe of absurdity.😲🤪🙉
Wow. Packs 500 missiles but this video is saying it is useless on the modern battlespace. That would depend on tactics and missile capabilities. Never underestimate your enemy.
I absolutely agree , The perspective of this video doesn’t take any of that into consideration….
Nothing holds 500 missiles of anything, unless they're Este's Rocket kits, you know the ones made out of cardboard tubing and you shove the solid fuel model engines in! Not to mention "allegedly" hypersonic missiles...that Russia has ZERO OF! Iskander/Kinzhal missiles are NOT hypersonics! They are only hyperson8c outside the atmosphere and don't maneuver for shit....EVEN THE CHINESE SAID SO...that's why they don't use them...plus ....Russia doesn't have 500 of any type of missile....dumb Bombs maybe. You shouldn't underestimate an enemy...you shouldn't believe everything an enemy says...when they are known for being the WORLDS MOST FULL OF SHIT COUNTRY/MILITARY IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND! WHAT happened to their Flagship "Moskva" "American Carrier Killer" "Best Ship in the World"..?...two missiles fired at it, SUNK! U.S.S. Carney has 51 anti-ship missiles, ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and drones fired at it and 51 FLAWLESS INTERCEPTIONS!!!....Super high tech missiles....from a country with no carriers, no stealth aircraft, no Sarmat, no T-14's, no G.P.S.,(unless they pirate ours), lost the black sea fleet to a country with no Navy, no Air Superiority over a country with no Air Force, and have been locked in a stalemate fight for 3 years with the #56th ranked military....that adversary...?...the people taking weapons and soldiers from Iran and North Korea...ok guys.
The Moskva had lots of missiles too. In fact, it's rumored that two of the WarHeads were nuclear yet look where it ended up
@chinogixxer7506 yet who is winning the war 😂 troll
Russophobia in it prime
This narrator is just a hater, this ship is bad ass
I would not call any ship that packs 500 missiles, along with other weapons, as useless.
This ship is one of the greatest ships in the world.
The ship 🚢 has not gone to sea trail yet, and no one outside Russia knows what it is going to like and how it is going to perform, but u are already writing it off. U must be GOD, know all
Author tell me, what's with the Zumwalt destroyer now? is he still deaf from going out to sea?
Full of false facts and utter nonsense.
New black sea sub?
Wonder if it was build so the front doesn´t fall off
Like your mom's nose you mean?
Note that the Kirov class guided-missiles cruiser and the subject of discussion Nakhimov missiles cruiser with its size and displacement of 28 thousand tons and 500 various types of missile system, needs a crew of 727 people, while the arleigh burke class (DDGs) with its smaller size and displacement of 8500 tons and 96 VLS systems complementing a crew of 323, here the Russian combat ship is considered better because it provides 5 times the amount of firepower with only twice the manpower, not to mention other combat support assets, and force multiplier elements, from easy attaching extra auxiliary fighting stations, the armor thickness of the hull, to the nuclear operated the help facilitate the operational flexibility of combat the vessel...
but one of the weaknesses of the Kirov class guided-missiles cruiser is its size and with it, its large radar cross-section not to mention the infrared signature in addition to the electro-magnetic emissions from all those mounted antennas and data links sensors, making it an easy target for detection, although the size of the ship facilitates equipping it with more electronic warfare systems for ECM/ECCM/ESM, than its arleigh burke class counterpart, although generally speaking the cruiser is larger than the destroyers, but for the navy of what is very temporarily called the united states of america even the ticonderoga class missiles cruiser, with its almost 10000 tons displacement, and 128 VLS systems complemented 330 crew members, while the Kirov class guided-missiles cruiser with almost 3 time displacement weight needed only 710 crew members...
worth noting other downsides for the Kirov class single vessel is brown/red painting of the ship surface, its make it easier to be distinguished from longer ranges either from the air or the space, for the Soviet navy with their huge fleet, all their vessels surface were painted in brown/red color this make it easy to be counted from the space...
I think the strong point for arleigh burke class guided missiles destroyers is by its smaller size and lower profile, making it difficult targets to discover from longer ranges considering the curve of earth, beside the to help enhance its speed and maneuverability...
I believe that in the context of a comprehensive war with the nato, its operational capabilities and tactical combat capabilities promoting the expanding the spectrum of its operational and strategic utilization or employments in the open seas and oceans or the blue and dark waters conducting strikes with conventional and non-conventional weapons It can be resupplied by shadow commercial vessels, but with the huge developments in Space, air and sea reconnaissance and surveillance electro-optical and electronic capabilities, compared to World War II, I believe that its fate will not different from the fate of the nasty germans bismarck battleship and the Japanese Yamato and Musashi capital battleships...
This ship is awesome
Beautiful ship and a formidable weapon. Carrier killer.
This is an almost forty year old ship. It was laid up and barely maintained for decades. It is "modernized" since 2015 on a shoestring budget amid constant delays. It is a prestige project, the real military value is fairly questionable. By the way, any Ticonderoga class cruiser can carry 488 missiles...It depends on the loadout 🙂.
The Peter is outdated but this one is modernized so yes it will survive in modern warfare
By observing the Chinese, who adopted the best practises of both Eastern and Western doctrine, it is far better to build multirole cruiser size ships than building single purpose one like the Kirovs, Slavas, or the Zumwalts.
An upgraded Kirov is still not to be underestimated as it still boast the best fire power of any surface combatant except for supercarriers, at least on paper.
The video is meant to demotivate Russian achievements. But as usual it will prove otherwise, as inbattle of Ukraine. Zircon hypersonic missile has performed extremely well in battle so as other missiles
Next step of testing is the diving tests. *"checks notes"* and the folding in half test.
Nice piece of a floating scrap :-) Thanks for the video. Are those Zirkons really able to reach hypersonic speeds if their carrier is not moving Mach 3, please?
My guy about to know about ballastic boosters and rocket boosters
Ask Ukrainians is it able.
Obviously You're not happy that your so called great military has no hypersonic missiles and Russia does.Ask the Ukrainians if. Russian hypersonic weapons work and then your ignorance will be cleared.
i still like Pyotr Velikiy than Nakhimov, i always use Velikiy in Modern Warships
Following this logic, aircraft carrier is even bigger white elephant. If ballistic missile like Oreshnik can hit it, it would be turned onto sieve. However, USA heavily rely on aircraft carriers which are hart and soul of their blue water navy.
Well I think that ship will take out us destroyer
Large ships like US aircraft carrier are sitting ducks to hypersonic missiles and swarms of drones.So don't pretend like the US has no large ships.
How is the accuracy of Zircon-missile questionable? I thought Ukraine shot them all down.🤔
If it still has to shut down the radar to get a proper communication signal out it will join the Slava/Moskou as soon as it faces an enemy..
Thumbs up for a great article on a ship class that was previously unknown to me...a nuclear powered 'BattleCruiser'.
Given how badly the Ukraine war has stretched Russia's budget, continuing with the Nakhimov's outfitting seems like a functionally useless enterprise. This is especially true given that the Nakhimov is stationed in the far north Atlantic, and Montreux convention explicitly bans entry/exit to/from the Black sea during military conflicts. (Besides, it would be a sitting duck passing through the Turkish straits
I wish people knew what "battlecruiser" means.
Good looking vessel, though
Scared?
Be afraid!
Russia could consider gmd
This pretty peaceful comment section
I take it ukern fans arent here
This guy is a hater for real!!
This guy is an idiot, comparing Kirov class with Burke class. The burke has only one Vulcan cannon, 96 cells, one searam launchers. Meanwhile the Kirov has 326 cells with missile like S-300F, OSA, Igla, Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks, and it has 4 Pantsir Missile Gun system. The Kirov is bigger, better and powerful than any ships in the us navy. This things were made to destroy US fleets.
Narrator funded by whom?😅
It literally can not fit 500 missles! It couldn't ship 500 shipborn missles let alone fire that many 🤦🏾
Really , what information and intelligence do you have to support your assessment….
@christophermontoya6178 The size of current Russian ship to ship, Anti-Air and hyper sonic missiles say it's not possible
You are sooooo wrong. Look at his brother ship Pyotr Veliky and his armament. It has 96 launch tubes for example.
@ACACARRR 96 is a Loooooog way from 500
They probably include MANPADS
That's a weird name for a new barrier reef.
Soon-to-be on Sub-SeaDuty with the Moskva😂
Se essa coisa receber defesas aéreas e submarinas adequadas pode fornecer o mesmo poder de fogo de um strik grup Américo inteiro 2 ticonderoga e 3 arliburk vôo 3, zircon teve dois lançamentos com zero interceptação,onix e kalibrir são mísseis de cruzeiro com alcance de 1200 km e vejo uma vez por semana esses mísseis sendo lançados e atingindo alvos na Ucrânia
Lleva 512 misiles AA, 64 48N6 y/o 40N6, con 250 y 380 km de alcance respectivamente, operados por el sistema S-400 en su versión naval, 256 misiles de la familia 9M96, con alcances que van desde los 80 a los 120 km, en 8x8 VLS, 4 misiles por celda, operados con el sistema Poliment -Redut ( AEGIS ruso y S-350),192 misiles Hermes-K, 32 por cada uno de los 6 CIWs Palma.
Para la ASW, lleva un RBU-12000 con 40 cohetes-bombas de profundidad y 2 RBU-1000 con 36 municiones cada uno, un sistema Packet-NK con 40 municiones, entre torpedos convencionales, de supercavitación, misiles-torpedos y torpedos antitorpedos, usando 10 tubos de lanzamiento y 2 helicópteros ASW Ka-28, con varios torpedos ligeros y sus propios sonares, el buque cuenta con 2 sonares Sarya, uno en el bulbo de proa y otro más atrás y un sonar de arrastre Minotaur en popa.
Been in dock since 1999 and still nothing to show for it. How typically Russian lmao
1 - The naval of USA is a mith, never found itself against any REAL ENEMY
2 - USA has today only 4 peers decks for construction
3 - USA its not in any way, shape or form the best naval around the world, Russia has the best subs all around, and they have more subs than USA has, more modern, with the most silent subs, with the most advanced weapons and defense systems
4 - Russia has the most sophisticated torpedos all around, the most advanced hypersonic missiles in the world, the most advanced air defense systems in land and navy
5 - China has more ships and shipyards constructing non stop more ships - you can say whatever you want, people in USA DOES NOT GO TO army anymore, the woke generation took USA, just gays, and women rules USA NOW..
6 - USA its in a trap full of imigrants entering USA BY MILLIONS every eyer, you will be like france, more africans and muslins in France than french citizens, this is happening right now in USA.
With all that in mid, USA HAS 35 TRILLIONS IN DEBT, no industry, sooner enough you will be solved.
Another Russian ongoing dud
The class Arleigh Burke in a accident in black sea 10ago,one russian plane counterac all electronic system off the ship,this is the really ,no the magazine news off all days in the tv,the Zircon missile is bad weapon???which the reason??the marketing???
Ele precisa de uma escolta de navios menores, e que grande navio não precisa, não ha lutas 1 contra 1 nunca houveram lutas 1 contra 1 , se ele tiver a cobertura necessária seus 500 mísseis ja são o suficiente para suturar toda uma frota de navios, mas ele e antigo e não porta o ápice da tecnologia como radares de nitreto de gálio ou tecnologia stelf
This ship will end up like the rest of the Russian black sea fleet on the bottom of the sea bed😅
Coping is hard 🥱🙄🤥
500 MISSILES...?....500 MISSILES...?...are Russians calling Rats..."missiles" now??...is that the thing.?...like when tha T-72 started up and those "missiles" were flying out of the exhaust and scampering all over the barn it was in and the soldiers were trying to stomp on those "missiles" as they scurried off. Like the "Tom and Missile" Cartoon show when we were kids.
592 misiles, sin contar los misiles-torpedos del sistema Packet-NK y los de los helicópteros Ka-28 (2). 256 misiles 9M96 y versiones, en 8x8 VLS, 4 misiles por celda, 64 misiles 48N6 y/o 40N6 en otras 8x8 VLS, 192 misiles Hermes-K, 32x6 CIWs Palma y 80 misiles superficie-superficie, Onix, Kalibre y/o Zircón.
Whenever I listen to or watch a price of Russian or Chinese military technology, the first thing I do is check to see who is delivering it.
It’s almost always immediately apparent whether or not the presenter is viewing the subject through the American lens
America is in the habit of reinforcing its own propaganda and even worse actually believing it
In doing so it has presented us with more than 20 years of underestimation of the capabilities of any other country and always presenting itself as technologically superior
It isn’t al- American gear is backwards. The country is broke. It’s not developing any new technologies and those that it does develop rob the American taxpayer blind, the classic example being the F 35 which is a piece of massively overpricedand and completely untested junk.
Russians on the other hand tend to build something with the long-term in mind rather than relying on its taxpayers to fund every new brain spasm created by the puffins in the Pentagon
Many of Russia’s aircraft began their development during the days of the union after which there was a hiatus before Putin was able to get the country back under control
But the US prefers to maintain the narrative of the old soviet Union as a gas station with nukes and everything else is backward because it is convenient to do so and to keep its own population and anybody else who will listen completely misinformed.
The truth however is that all of the Western technology has been tested in Ukraine and found wanting and is piled up as junk in Ukrainian or as trophies in Moscow
And while the US seems to care about how it is perceived in the world, Russia doesn’t worry about the opinions of others but just gets on with it and lets the proof be seen in the pudding.
Besides, if nothing else, Russia bills, wonderful looking ships, Which aesthetically blow the American creations out of the water as far as elegant of design is concerned.
I don't agree with this guy Assessment at all ! This Ship is a Beast !!!! 500 Missiles on Board and Hypersonic- Onix and Zircons and KH s !!!!! Obviosity will be Cruisers along too for more protectional and some Nuclear Submarines too ! Its a Absolute Beast of the seas ! Go Russia !
What a load of BS.
Stealth sucks
Stop bringing about the United states weapons sucker's in the war in Ukraine 😅😅
Very soon it will join the cruiser Moskva as the flagship of a special Russian submarine armada!
ουκρανε στις επομενες εκλογες στην ναζι χωρα σου ισως να ψηφισεις τον πουτιν
Lmaoooo
Russia is sending out it's latest submarine :)> ... noting they have learned almost nothing from the Ukraine war. They should have added 40MM Bofors guns amidships to deal with drone boats. their anti-cruise missile guns amidships may do nothing. But then, almost nobody learns anything from even recent history.
What a crap ship.
FAFO
This video is typical analysis of Russian enemy. This Battelcruiser Admiral Nakhimov is Most powerful ship on planet EVER BUILT. Yet this video is TALKING BS about it. As i Said what do you except from Russian enemy to say anything but BS. Yet after reading comments about this biased video I've seen lots of absurd and ignorant comments that are beyond believe of absurdity.😲🤪🙉