The Nub Of India-China Boundary Row

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 192

  • @umeshdesh
    @umeshdesh 4 роки тому +44

    Why golden opportunity to get POK was lost in 1971 war. We should have bargained against the release of 90000 Pakistani soldiers

    • @ameyabakre4609
      @ameyabakre4609 4 роки тому +4

      India has always wants to mother India to entire world...

    • @raviptv
      @raviptv 4 роки тому +7

      Going by Pakistan track record of disowning their Martyrs in wars. Don't think it would have made any difference to Pakistan.....

    • @swaminathanr8794
      @swaminathanr8794 4 роки тому +4

      Greatest blunder was to give up occupied territories in 1971 war which 1000s of Indian army soldiers gave their life for..India should have taken Gilgit, which now Pakistan is gifted to Chinese for CPEC corridor

    • @ameyabakre4609
      @ameyabakre4609 4 роки тому

      @@raviptv Please take a note that same solders were present in next kargil war against India..

    • @SureshKumar-lm9qy
      @SureshKumar-lm9qy 4 роки тому

      They would disown their own . Cheap types.

  • @saurabhtiwari7810
    @saurabhtiwari7810 4 роки тому +14

    It is the best explanation I have seen of this conflict. Thank you

  • @AmitSingh-nl7mp
    @AmitSingh-nl7mp 4 роки тому +3

    We stand with our leadership and army..everything for country..jai hind..

  • @reetipandey2768
    @reetipandey2768 4 роки тому +1

    Sir your presentation is immaculate, making even the most complex of issues very lucid to understand. Keep going!!

  • @sguptamech
    @sguptamech 4 роки тому +8

    I think India is equally responsible for not manning the its boundries for more than a decade after independance.

  • @praveenlakhe2471
    @praveenlakhe2471 4 роки тому +6

    Whats different this time?
    Its not shephards,nomads,etc.who noticed and alerted agencies but the security forces.
    Its huge difference this time.

  • @iphonesmartphone7948
    @iphonesmartphone7948 4 роки тому +1

    Clean and clear explanation, one of the best I have heard so far. Thank-you for this episode.

  • @treckmaster4
    @treckmaster4 4 роки тому +1

    Superbly explained. Appreciate the clarity this video brought about on the Chinese claim lines. Thank you Mr Nitin

  • @promodebandyopadhyay1686
    @promodebandyopadhyay1686 4 роки тому +5

    More people need to watch SNG. I find SNG to be very clear and informative.

  • @damodarbhat1344
    @damodarbhat1344 4 роки тому +4

    Good information and narrative, liked it

  • @rallapalliprabhu1998
    @rallapalliprabhu1998 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you for clear historic perspective of the conflict.We should free Tibet.

  • @rsridhar63
    @rsridhar63 4 роки тому +1

    Clear... This time the map remained nearly still making it easier to correlate the narration to the image... 👍

  • @subhashwigh5583
    @subhashwigh5583 4 роки тому

    Great👌👌really very very informative,thanks alot

  • @venkatesanraviram
    @venkatesanraviram 4 роки тому +3

    Great. Informative

  • @Vikramadithya02
    @Vikramadithya02 4 роки тому

    Thanks for the video. Right timing.

  • @srinivasmorey4229
    @srinivasmorey4229 4 роки тому +2

    Sir You Are Doing A Tremendous Job Of Brefing The People Who Sre Interested

  • @sumitvfx
    @sumitvfx 4 роки тому

    Thanks for explaining in simple terms... really simply nitin

  • @rajiblochanpanigrahi2198
    @rajiblochanpanigrahi2198 4 роки тому

    Thanks sir.. always waiting for your individual lecture... explanation with proper representation is knowledgefull..🤗🤗 thanks

  • @akmachama5025
    @akmachama5025 4 роки тому

    Thanks for updating

  • @ashwinbadri2976
    @ashwinbadri2976 4 роки тому

    Great work NG, good insights and the most authentic and realistic perspective of the ground situation and long term challenges ahead for us .

  • @hkpcnair
    @hkpcnair 4 роки тому +7

    Precisely explained using map. Thank you sir.

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 роки тому

      what he did not tell you is India map of 1950 showed the border as undefined. Only in 1954 India came up with its border claim, based on mixing two historical documents from different decades. Google and read the academic paper 'Treaties, Maps and the Western Sector of the Sino-Indian Boundary Dispute'
      By ALASTAIR LAMB

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      @@nestser Same with Chinese map before 1949..

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 роки тому

      Vipra vipra Definitely not the same. We do not just declare a new border unilaterally, out of no where, like the India case. China's objective is to define its border through new treaty signed by PRC itself, although historical claim does have a role in the process. The problem is India believe it's all well defined and no disputes at all, at least before the 1962 war, which is not true. Basically recognizing vs denying existence of the problem.

    • @hkpcnair
      @hkpcnair 4 роки тому

      @@nestser Xinjiang and Tibet both are occupied by china and will be free soon.

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 роки тому

      Hari Only after Kashmir becomes independent and away from India!

  • @sunitjain7333
    @sunitjain7333 4 роки тому

    Thanks, Nitin....v good info

  • @RajAil
    @RajAil 4 роки тому +4

    Sir Thanks for the walk down to the root cause of this clashes. Sir I would like you to make a detail analysis of the cost for both the Country in case of limited war in Himalayas!

  • @kapilrana5075
    @kapilrana5075 4 роки тому +2

    Stratnews should release 5 to 7 to 10 minutes documentaries without any anchor n fill it with pics n vidoes and quotes every week on defence issues around the world..thats the surest way to rise your subscribers..pls do it.

  • @shubhamsingh7816
    @shubhamsingh7816 4 роки тому

    Thanks for such good analysis and info graphics !

  • @rajeev4243
    @rajeev4243 4 роки тому

    I am a bit confused on the 1959 claim line which appears to be quite East of existing LAC..? At least that's what it appears in the multiple maps I have seen till now including today's video. Would be grateful Mr Gokhale if you could explain why we should not accept 1959 line 9f it means PLA moving back substantially from present positions?

    • @nirmal3028
      @nirmal3028 4 роки тому

      Why means, whole aksai chin belongs to India, by accepting 1959 boundary, India will give up Aksai chin fully to China

  • @spartan-self4518
    @spartan-self4518 4 роки тому

    Good work sir .. keep us informing 🤙🤙

  • @ravindervenkataraman7009
    @ravindervenkataraman7009 4 роки тому

    Thank you Nitin ji 🙏🏿 for the clear explanation of the Ladakh border situation and background.

  • @Vinodkumar-bm9ig
    @Vinodkumar-bm9ig 4 роки тому

    I love your videos with lot information which young generation don’t know sir .. keep doing good work

  • @visheshverma6240
    @visheshverma6240 2 роки тому

    Great clip, very informative

  • @amudhanr2666
    @amudhanr2666 4 роки тому

    Superb and impartial analysis giving facts,as usual 👏 👌

  • @souravmukherjee8620
    @souravmukherjee8620 4 роки тому

    Informative episode

  • @nagindersahota7276
    @nagindersahota7276 4 роки тому

    Excellent!

  • @thirutheboss1212
    @thirutheboss1212 4 роки тому

    Clear explanation sir.. good work..

  • @AMITKUMAR_Hindu
    @AMITKUMAR_Hindu 4 роки тому

    Thanks for great information 🙏

  • @blackmamba3427
    @blackmamba3427 4 роки тому

    Awesome video and commentary 👌

  • @ABHILASH307
    @ABHILASH307 4 роки тому

    Sir pls do make a video explaining why India lost the 1962 war ,if possible try to cover it sector wise

  • @alokkumarsingh1852
    @alokkumarsingh1852 4 роки тому +1

    One of best on strategy affairs.

  • @karthikb5
    @karthikb5 4 роки тому

    1. Excellent analysis Sir, as always
    2. Shifting goal-post behavior from China - clearly tells, they do not really want to settle anything but keep the fire on

  • @nayanbuch4075
    @nayanbuch4075 4 роки тому

    As you mentioned about 1959 as lac is giving more area in Ladakh region as compared to present lac .I think China can not give the area which they have already occupied.There must be some big game in their mind and under standing it GOI refused to accept it. What is the game can you explain?

  • @alokbhattacharya6523
    @alokbhattacharya6523 4 роки тому

    Beautiful explanation ...

  • @craumm
    @craumm 4 роки тому

    Please talk of Pulam Sumda/o and couple of other areas in HP and UK that China claims (as per Google maps). Is that area militarised and safe from incursions?

  • @BlessedReader
    @BlessedReader 4 роки тому

    Nitinji...don't you think you should start differentiating between the Tibet Autonomous Region and China in your maps?

  • @nirmal3028
    @nirmal3028 4 роки тому

    If China is accepting to 1959, India must not fall into trap, whole Aksai chin belongs to India and Tibet was illegally occupied, India must directly hit the bull eye by declaring Tibet as independent country, anyhow Tibet security will be maintained by Indian army till Tibet builds its army........lets workout solution that will benefit India to maximum. Mr Nitin Explanation and Clarification about border issue from 1950 to 1962 & present condition was excellent ,clear & to the point . Mr Nitin can contribute well in Ministry of external affairs

  • @virenbgada
    @virenbgada 4 роки тому

    Good explanation & great job.

  • @arunbhatia6344
    @arunbhatia6344 4 роки тому

    Excellent piece of analysis. Didn’t know that Indians, till 1957 used patrol right up to the edge of Aksai Chin !
    Let’s say, hypothetically India goes offensive, do they have a chance to go back and create a border till the edge of Aksai Chin ?!

  • @MAHENDRADALVIGoa47
    @MAHENDRADALVIGoa47 4 роки тому +1

    This time China has miscalculated and is in dilemma.

  • @manurashkaushal9325
    @manurashkaushal9325 4 роки тому +1

    Superb Sir

  • @shanu7uday
    @shanu7uday 4 роки тому

    If CRPF used to patrol till Lanka La, then how come we had no hint of such large highway being built by China 1955???

  • @SureshKumar-lm9qy
    @SureshKumar-lm9qy 4 роки тому

    Clear explanation .👍

  • @Abbyramrosy
    @Abbyramrosy 4 роки тому +1

    Well explained

  • @VijeDerm
    @VijeDerm 4 роки тому

    Very neatly put

  • @louistao9505
    @louistao9505 4 роки тому +1

    As long as India don’t join the belt and road and try to counter it... China and India border will never be resolved... China need that border dispute...China don’t need an inch of India land... they need India to join China... that’s the long goal...

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      No that's not, long term goal of Chinese Communist Party is to eliminate all the future potential rivals in their quest for world dominance..

    •  4 роки тому

      BRI was started by Xi Jinping. Border troubles between India and China going on since 1959.

    • @louistao9505
      @louistao9505 4 роки тому

      Vipra vipra... wtf U.S can’t even do that how can China dominate the world.... they need allies like Russia and India... its China wishful thinking if they think they can win Russia in a war...

  • @shubhampandey9812
    @shubhampandey9812 4 роки тому

    Thank you Nitin Sir for this as well as for previous episodes of simply Nitin it is very very informative for us to know what's was going in Ladakh form past several times. Sir my request is to make one video on Battle of rezangla on mighty mountains of Himalaya. I want to know the details of how small company of Kumaon regiment defeated the chinese army.

  • @subramanyapadmanabhan1548
    @subramanyapadmanabhan1548 4 роки тому

    Whereas, we are strategically located in Andaman-Nicobar, there is a Myanmar owned island in the vicinity which the owner government not finding worth, they leased out to China instead of India: the Coco Islands, 3 of them where the Chinese have built up an airport and some buildingsfrom which they can watch us. Govt. of India must.

    • @subramanyapadmanabhan1548
      @subramanyapadmanabhan1548 4 роки тому

      must acquire them from Myanmar on lease or sale to ward off Chinese from Coco Islands.

  • @snair10
    @snair10 4 роки тому

    Hi Nithin, nice to know some new points. Can you please throw some light on the Kailash range, as you mentioned now India is in control of it does it mean the sacred pilgrimage where we go to will not require a visa from Chinese from now on.
    Regards
    Satish

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому +1

      No Kailash range is not same Kailash mansarovar mountain..

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      Kailash range is south of Spranggar Tso lake across Indus river..

  • @craumm
    @craumm 4 роки тому +1

    Amit Shah statement; is it really that important. Barely anyone sees parliamentary proceedings even in India🤔

    • @craumm
      @craumm 4 роки тому

      @Kambojas Kambo yes. But a lot goes in the parliament proceedings and literally no one hears them

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      @Kambojas Kambo It's our birth right claims which is same as China claims Arunachal Pradesh..
      So China don't feel shame about this, so I don't feel India should feel the same..
      Besides India in 1994 under PV Narsimha Rao had passed the Parliamentary resolution on the Undivided State of Jammu and Kashmir..
      hwnews.in/news/opinion/pv-narasimha-rao-india-kashmir/47630

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      @Kambojas Kambo Besides China is unapologetic about the One China policy so why should we not be on United one India policy..

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      @Kambojas Kambo The Indian parliament unanimously passed Kashmir Resolution on 22 February 1994. The resolution read: “On behalf of the People of India, the Indian Parliament firmly declares that:
      (a) The State of Jammu & Kashmir has been, is and shall be an integral part of India and any attempts to separate it from the rest of the country will be resisted by all necessary means; (b) India has the will and capacity to firmly counter all designs against its unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity; and demands that (c) Pakistan must vacate the areas of the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir, which they have occupied through aggression; and resolves that (d) All attempts to interfere in the internal affairs of India will be met resolutely.”

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      @Kambojas Kambo Just relax and chill..
      People before 2019 were saying same things regarding Ram mandir and Article 370 issues that's it just political gimmick of BJP, Modi had proven them wrong..
      Basically Government is planning about it but maybe due to secrecy they will not tell when they will take the steps..
      So when the Government take the steps we as a responsible citizen should help the government and Indian Army to recover our lost territories..

  • @praveendugar4122
    @praveendugar4122 4 роки тому

    नितिन जी एक छोटा सा सुझाव कृपया लड़ाक की जगह लद्दाख ही उच्चारण करने का प्रयास करें। प्रचलन में यही है

  • @carryon2197
    @carryon2197 4 роки тому +8

    We have traditionally had excellent relations with Tibet. Help the Tibetans in their struggle for freedom. Once Tibetans establish their Independent self rule surely border differences resolve completely.
    It is for the world to recognise the plight of Tibetans loosing their homeland & under constant subjugation. Elsewhere if Israelis could be sympathised with to find their home, so why not Tibetans.
    Tibetans need all the help to stay free in their homeland. Then it would be meaningful to resolve border differences with the gentle Buddhist people of Tibet than greedy CCP.

    • @craumm
      @craumm 4 роки тому

      Tibetans are almost a minority in Tibet

    • @pokbanegahindustan2160
      @pokbanegahindustan2160 4 роки тому

      Instead of India, at first USA should support Tibetans like they did in Afganistan against USSR

  • @rajbodepudi
    @rajbodepudi 4 роки тому +1

    India should lead to a global
    Coalition to Free Tibet!

  • @vinodhkona9936
    @vinodhkona9936 4 роки тому

    Wow we did not discovered a highway for a decade which is built on our land🤭🤭

  • @sunilkumar-lb6en
    @sunilkumar-lb6en 4 роки тому

    Can u pl talk sometime about china's internal politics in occupied Tibet region and whether in the event of war india can get some advantage.

  • @vijaykadam7950
    @vijaykadam7950 4 роки тому

    Nitin can you throw some light on QUAD

  • @surendrabarsode8959
    @surendrabarsode8959 4 роки тому

    Good program. Please also make some programs on possible war/battle scenarios and how we are pitched against the Chinese. This will give us a better understanding of the ground level situation. Of course, we all know that now LAC is LOC and in future, we will be face to face with the Chinese but we are fully capable of defending against them and protect areas under our physical control. The issue is if we can ever take back areas under our official map and how.

  • @pravin3783
    @pravin3783 4 роки тому

    1959 Chinese claim line is beyond current LAC? Are Chinese ready to vacate area in between, if India agrees to accept it as IB?

  • @sekarsubburam8656
    @sekarsubburam8656 4 роки тому

    Pl enlighten us on Depsong area. Who is in advantageous position vis-a-vis the LAC stand off. Why we are not forthcoming to capture Akchaichin. A lready we have given a long rope to Pakistan vis-a-vis capturing of the POK . Now it is time which we should not loose.

  • @SuperRambala
    @SuperRambala 4 роки тому

    1959 line seems to be ok, compared to 1962 line or today where they are , why we are concerned

  • @jaswindersian3159
    @jaswindersian3159 4 роки тому +2

    Ideal opportunity to get back POK back and drive China to its original border with Tibet. India did not have a border with China.

  • @azhakathranjith
    @azhakathranjith 4 роки тому +1

    Hi Nitin, would 1959 line (yellow line) be a sensible option especially since India will get a part of Aksai chin and solve a long standing dispute

    • @kmhjn4363
      @kmhjn4363 4 роки тому

      Whole Aksai Chin belongs to India.

  • @mr.d2124
    @mr.d2124 4 роки тому

    🙏🔥🔥

  • @tusharkorde6015
    @tusharkorde6015 4 роки тому

    If India still claims the Axai Chin, why India want to clarify LAC?

  • @kumarkr3599
    @kumarkr3599 4 роки тому +2

    Clearly explained, the Chinese ever - widening claims with changing colors.

  • @rikbhattacharya5019
    @rikbhattacharya5019 4 роки тому

    Infrastructure is the only answer, we have our massive capable military concentrated in comparatively small area than C. _ (#IN), -@ . If our army can reach in place xyz at the border then our northern neighbor has no chance, on top of that if we can effectively use quad as a military alliance in the naval front.

  • @sanjayram4831
    @sanjayram4831 4 роки тому +3

    vacuum created by the deficiencies of our on make,lead this crisis and will continue till we overcome them.

  • @adroitspartan7907
    @adroitspartan7907 4 роки тому

    Why doesn't the govt put a "no quid pro quo wealth tax" on Indian billionaires in India they have a lot to lose(mcap) from an all out war and none of them sacrifice any of their progeny to the motherland. The forces can be equipped with better hardware and gear from the proceeds. Also, preference in access to central funds and FDI should be given to states/communities who provide the most(%) manpower to the forces not the others who give so little but take so much ...

  • @shanu7uday
    @shanu7uday 4 роки тому

    एक बात समझ नहीं आयी.. जब १९६२ में हमारी हार हो गई थी, तो उस ज़मीन (अक्साई चीन) पर चीन का हक़ हुआ ना ?

  • @ddarrenmsamey8115
    @ddarrenmsamey8115 4 роки тому

    China deployment seems not to contain but to confront and expand continuously . As you rightly said Creepy forward strategy

  • @nvmsivaji
    @nvmsivaji 4 роки тому

    Sir, how is India prepared to face tank warfare of China in Depsang and DBO areas?

  • @mayakoushik
    @mayakoushik 4 роки тому

    Might is right.

  • @sanjayv8467
    @sanjayv8467 4 роки тому +1

    It will help us to understand the Chinese aggression better if you could delve & explain about this "Middle Kingdom Syndrome". Also provide references for serious researchers.

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      Just Google 'TianXia' ... Wikipedia article wouldbe good enough..

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      Basically Chinese emperor are son of heaven and whatever the land lies below the Heaven (sky) is there domain or territories..
      No other nation is there equal to them and everyone has to pay tribute to them..

  • @tarunpoddar4913
    @tarunpoddar4913 4 роки тому

    You should hand it to the Chinese that they had a strategic view even when the Communists came to power in 1949 and they have worked continuously towards this end. Nibbling, salami slicing, two steps forward one step back or creation of artificial islands and the EEZ with it was and is an ongoing process towards it’s expansionism . USA fell to lobbying of American business interests to bury the hatchet during the Nixon era and compromised it’s strategic interests. USA is now confronted by a Frankenstein. India unfortunately at the time of Independence was led by a political novice who believed in morality even after the recent tragedy of the War and wanted to do away with the Army. The politicians failed India time and again. The Chinese communists are to thrashed like a bully and thrown out of Aksai Chin.

  • @nrao8977
    @nrao8977 4 роки тому

    Rehashing old stories will not help.
    Glad MEA has declined to take Chinese offer - that was to be expected. But, the continued silence is very undemocratic. Once a month GoI should appraise of the status.

  • @vp4439
    @vp4439 4 роки тому

    What you have ignored is QUAD alliance and US realisation that India needs support of US leadership

  • @dunkinpossum
    @dunkinpossum 4 роки тому

    News outta Force magazine is that the Chinese hav black topped roads, established an ecological system n laid down microfibre cables...n here I hear that they rn't as prepared as the IDF?
    I'm sure that we'll hear/know more after this winter passes.

    • @sarathnair5466
      @sarathnair5466 4 роки тому

      Force magazine brings out points on a different manner... what they say cannot be neglected...however whatever is happening in India-China border may not end well for anyone...hopefully this will be resolved in a peaceful manner... it will end as nuclear war and other adversaries will involve.... China has done a number of blunders .. they have made almost all major world powers as their enemies.. i will not be surprised to see a Chinese revolution against CCP in near future even a part of PLA could turn against them..

  • @ddarrenmsamey8115
    @ddarrenmsamey8115 4 роки тому

    Good post 👌👍👏👏 Also make a post on Honey trap , Debt trap etc , Spying etc, About Percentages to be paid to CCP from business profits of Chinese companies in foreign companies in detail if any for info

  • @SuperRambala
    @SuperRambala 4 роки тому

    Simple, When China occupied Tibet, the trouble started not due to Aksai chin or not

  • @sandeepssangha
    @sandeepssangha 4 роки тому +1

    High chance China will try to repeat 1962 on 20-22nd October this year.. They like to repeat old playbook which worked for them earlier.

    • @cctvcamera2105
      @cctvcamera2105 4 роки тому

      China is not interested any war

    • @Partha.N
      @Partha.N 4 роки тому

      @@cctvcamera2105 , China interested in bat soup.

    • @vipravipra4486
      @vipravipra4486 4 роки тому

      India is prepared and no of troops they requested to overrun the entire LAC would be more than 1 million+..

  • @shiladityadas8791
    @shiladityadas8791 4 роки тому

    Very illaborately discussed about the line of control changed by time. Only option to tackle Imperial china a strong military resistance. As China take care a fig any agreement as seen from past as communists are always double standards and imperial by heart. Like to have a details discussion on Arunachal Pradesh and latest situation about Himachal Pradesh & Uttarakhand border with Cina occupied Tibet.

  • @hemangmehta7081
    @hemangmehta7081 4 роки тому

    We expect your analysis on how much we still need to prepare to get an edge over the Chinese and a crushing defeat so that nobody dares to attack india

  • @frostbyte8285
    @frostbyte8285 4 роки тому

    *World should Prepare for Long term China Chalange.*

  • @aniltewari7043
    @aniltewari7043 4 роки тому

    We have to take tuff stand this time against China . Engage them in a long stand off and wait for a situation when we can put pressure on them to solve the boundary issues once for ever . This time exchange of , negotiated map is a must . Both of us can't afford conflict and standoff for a long period .

  • @huanghermann5207
    @huanghermann5207 4 роки тому

    This is very clear but it's Indian version, not the Chinese version of interpretation, hence the dispute.

    • @huanghermann5207
      @huanghermann5207 4 роки тому

      @Lady Anon this is exact the root of the problem: your words can be applied to my Indian friends too.

  • @illuminatusdeus3051
    @illuminatusdeus3051 4 роки тому

    How do you deal with someone who wants to save his face, but wants another to lose theirs? They want to be seen as a superpower, prince regent, leader but to another, they want diminished and humiliated? I think this is inevitable, India has to militarize their borders. I am talking serious militarization with land mines so that they stop creeping in further. They will not fight a war because their supply lines will be stretched from the plateau. And if they sink into Indian territory, Indian slope disadvantage becomes their disadvantage, they think Indians aren't able to do that. You cannot allow another element of surprise, instead, claim Aksai Chin and bargain it for dropping their claims on Arunachal. Simple trade, less drama, the Chinese have lost Tawang, this needs to be accepted. India is China's counter weight, this needs to be accepted by them.

  • @JBC100
    @JBC100 4 роки тому

    After all this happened...I'm really looking India army has to teach a lesson to China by advancing forward in peak winter and Occupy Aksai Chin and give a bloody nose 👃

  • @alecmisra4964
    @alecmisra4964 4 роки тому

    Well i dont think india can get a hard border with this claim line anyway, so it seems to be a hoax offer.

  • @humayunbawkher5372
    @humayunbawkher5372 4 роки тому

    Insightful, but if you ask China to explain or justify its border claims it too will present similar or even older maps possibly dating back to the Chinese Middle Kingdom era that they believe in . So the border issue and tension will probably linger and cost a lot of money. People in India should rally thank Mr Amit Shah and Mr Modi for so unwisely stoking this border issue by claiming POK and Aksai Chin.

    • @VijaySingh-oh6gl
      @VijaySingh-oh6gl 4 роки тому

      They have passed a bill in parliament showing Ladakh and JnK, to do that in Indian Parliament u have to face opposition n then u have to explain why u show something which u don't have, hence they said we will take back Aksai Chin, because otherwise opposition will not sit quite as ruling party will gain upperhand without saying this so they made them say this . China got alarmed that India is going to take back Aksai Chin. But ur statement comes from fear that China will obliterate us and what not, that's the first time in so many 100 years China has worried and that's very good indeed, it is not used to such utterances from any Indian in last 100years. India will not lose an inch now. Chinese cannot fight Vietnamese on land let alone Indian Army which is ready to fight China alongwith Air and Naval support. Thanks to Amit Shah and Modiji for doing this.

  • @KaranKaran-wy7er
    @KaranKaran-wy7er 4 роки тому

    About Chinese Stand Off - Chinese Smoke Screen is not Depsung Or Finger 4 Ladak it's.. Making Gilgit Baltistan 5th State of Pakistan for CPEC than Retreat.... Unless statblity is maintain in Gil-Balt the stand off will prevail.... 😂😂😂😂

  • @santoshr2984
    @santoshr2984 4 роки тому

    Insecurity in Chinese minds is a good thing :0)

  • @umeshdesh
    @umeshdesh 4 роки тому

    Why India has never tried to get back POK including Gilgit Baltistan and Aksai Chin which we claim ours.

    • @dilipmundhada5875
      @dilipmundhada5875 4 роки тому

      It has no guts. Moreover India lacked killing spirit. All this could have been settled and sorted out during 1971 war and win. We have lost the war on negotiating table. Indira Gandhi was drunk during Shimla summit.

    • @nestser
      @nestser 4 роки тому

      Then why separate Pakistan? Regretting now?

  • @indd7871
    @indd7871 4 роки тому

    whenver you have time make a episode on Pakistan like not only for border dispute with India but also afghanistan and what price it paid to China in 60s .