@@powerday_Hi-B Better playback sound quality I guess u mean but how about the recording section, for example when recording a metal or chrome tape, which one is better and why. Someone is trying to sell me a Sony TC-D5M. Thanks in advance.
@@TitoMariategui in stock, Teac recorded not very well. Non-linear response on all types of tapes, limited to 15,000..17000 Hz (-20@dolby). Hot record, average. It can be better
@@TitoMariategui The owner of the TC-D5 was in a hurry for me. I didn't have time to check the recording channel thoroughly. In any case, the D5 has a fixed bias and a strong LF bumps effect. It is unlikely that he will lie to compete with three-headed stationary decks
Which better for you Sony or Teac ? Thanks :)
Of course Sony.
@@powerday_Hi-B Better playback sound quality I guess u mean but how about the recording section, for example when recording a metal or chrome tape, which one is better and why. Someone is trying to sell me a Sony TC-D5M. Thanks in advance.
@@TitoMariategui in stock, Teac recorded not very well. Non-linear response on all types of tapes, limited to 15,000..17000 Hz (-20@dolby).
Hot record, average. It can be better
@@powerday_Hi-B and what about Sony TC-D5M, does it stand out when recording?
@@TitoMariategui
The owner of the TC-D5 was in a hurry for me. I didn't have time to check the recording channel thoroughly.
In any case, the D5 has a fixed bias and a strong LF bumps effect.
It is unlikely that he will lie to compete with three-headed stationary decks