I use to own a home in downing Stockton way back 2010 very cheap ...sold it after two yrs and I ended up moving back to Newark in bay area..old home but I'm happy no stress.
I saw a lot of big home construction. Where are the smaller starter homes being built? A lot of singles, couples, and seniors want to buy instead of rent.
How are you, including micro homes/tiny homes, walkable towns? Is there land to buy to place tiny homes that are self supporting while building a bigger home
@@Law19157 you do realize not everyone has the option to drive right and even if that was so it would still be an incredible waste of energy. public transport, better infrastructure and ride sharing all need to be an option to keep congestion down and just improve quality of life.
@@tysupply8408 You talk about congestion while wanting everyone to be densely packed shoulder to shoulder in small spaces, you're talking from both sides of your mouth.
@@Law19157 when did i ever say I wanted people to be shoulder to shoulder? I said not everyone has the option to drive a vehicle, there is no one size fits all for this matter an example living in a urban landscape vs a rural area are going to have different connotations. stop trying make an argument by putting words in peoples mouth
6:21 Mountain View feels odd on that list for sure. Glad to see a close in city actually growing... This list 5yrs ago probably would have had Dublin and San Ramon on it too but they are pretty much built out...and aren't really affordable anymore...
it is a nice city but it is getting very expensive to live here , most new subdivision pay a Mello roos tax on top of their property tax . affordability was one reason I moved from Monterey county and now it is about the same and traffic is getting worse
@@jayralston2305 dont worry its gonna be alot less expensive by 2027 just keep watching the news it has been dull from summer 2020-2024 i know, but its picking up
I agree but the broadcast was originally aired on the local Sacramento ABC affiliate so most of their original audience was probably familiar with these northern central valley towns listed.
Lathrop? In the polluted windy Central Valley. Nothing new. The peripheral bedroom communities from the Bay Area moving further and further east. Watch out for cheap and defective tract homes as in all such boom towns (Remember 2008). TBH if Tesla and others are there (not Texas?) makes it an edge city so maybe a more sustainable growth. Maybe.
you bring up 2008 do you have any idea that in the next 1-5 months we are likely to experience the 2nd worst economic meltdown since 1930 ? you dont have to believe me just survive 200 days it wont be long. Theres nothing to "remember" we going have the first wake up call after 16 years the pandemic delayed and messed everything up i been sitting tight for 4 and half years for this day.
Lodi ca was cheap and very affordable. Then about 10 years ago the prices started going up the people from the Bay Area started moving up move. I live in a 1 bedroom apartment with my husband and 2 kids. And a former tenant in our apartment #6 just moved further north of California. I believe it was Yuba City California. And the one that moved in 3 months ago is from the Bay Area. They thought 1,300 of rent was pretty cheap because where they lived before was 2, 000 for a 1bedroom apartment there. I think people are just going to keep moving
It's great if regular people have a shot at buying a house if they have a family and that allows them to build generational wealth. It's terrible if you have a giant apartment complex and you pay rent your whole life to a landlord who gets rich while you and your kids will have nothing. That's why it's important to have balanced population growth where we don't have so many new people that we can no longer give them a good quality of life. That's also why densely populated countries like Japan, South Korea, China, Germany, etc have low birth rates and high alcohol consumption. Too many people, too few resources.
@@aminy23 Balanced population growth? What does that mean? Do you mean building excessively large houses on arable land? It is better to make existing metro areas more livable and affordable. Cars are not getting any cheaper, so car-centric cities don’t make a lot of sense. The United States spends $5 trillion dollars every year to travel by car. A major part of that cost is road infrastructure. Cities like Lathrap are not sustainable longterm. The roads in good condition are usually in new and/or wealthy areas. Roads are maintained by increasing the tax base through constant population growth. When the growth slows, the city will not be able to maintain the roads. The rate of alcoholism in the United States is the same as South Korea, and a lot higher than Japan and Germany. The is major problem in the United States with meth addiction, including in rural areas. People in the United States are not self medicating due to population density. United States is the only country in the world to have a double digit percentage rate for alcoholism in women. The only reason that the United States’ population has not stagnated is because of immigration.
@@barryrobbins7694 The model of infinite growth is not sustainable. This is something people around the world realize. The birth rate of Japan, South Korea, China, or Germany is low because the educated people don't want to have an abundance of children whom they can't properly care for. The problem with extremism of all forms is when we try to needlessly control and micro-manage the lives of others. I welcome everything productive. If San Francisco wants to build bike paths - that's fine. If California wants to build rail - that's fine. If Oakdale wants a highway - that's fine. There's no reason we cannot have different shoes for different feet. If a family with 3 kids wants a house, we shouldn't need to punish them. If a single college graduate wants an urban apartment, they shouldn't be punished either. The problem happens when they turn the people against each other. Asians (myself included) are getting wealthy because we embrace multi-generational living. We don't want to constantly pay our income to a landlord. When kids go to college, leave their parents, and then pay rent and student loans from 22-50+ - all that liberation just means they're paying out to the rich. When politicians stop road development, stop developing public transport, stop building affordable housing - their expenses go down, and their revenue stays the same. That lets the revenue go to the wrong pockets. If places like SF or Oakland actually did their job and built enough homes, and kept people safe - no one would be moving to Lathrop or Roseville. The people who keep complaining are the people who don't want to actually do the right thing. We can complain about carbon emissions from power - why not build nuclear plants? Why not invest in hydroelectric, solar, and power storage? If you want to fight highway and road development, why not use that money in public transport instead? Do it the right way, and people will follow.
@@aminy23 I don’t really disagree with most of what you said. Sprawling car centric development is not the best way forward. As you stated, the fact that people are moving there is an indication of systemic defects in the wider society. The Bay Area should be made more livable.
reading the comments nobody is to worried about the brewing financial crisis/ liquidity crisis thats likely to finally spill over in 2025 after being stalled since march 2020 as well as homes being in bubble very rare in history. It just doesn't look good when not enough people are concerned maybe they got complacent and when this was trending 2 years ago online they just forgot by 2024 oh well.
Glad to see these great cities highlighted!
Yuba City / Marysville traffic is terrible, some of the worst I’ve experienced in rural California.
Tweakers galore 😂
Marysville traffic is worst.
They finally made a 4 lane on Highway 70 but Marysville the worst traffic they need a road outside the city
@@elchapojr6219 a bypass would be awesome
Happy to see positive, California news! ❤
in the face of the unfolding 2nd largest housing crash since the great depression?
I use to own a home in downing Stockton way back 2010 very cheap ...sold it after two yrs and I ended up moving back to Newark in bay area..old home but I'm happy no stress.
Yuba city go up like 45mins north you have Chico that place is booming
I saw a lot of big home construction. Where are the smaller starter homes being built? A lot of singles, couples, and seniors want to buy instead of rent.
People in the US just gotta have their large but boring looking house.
For those who wanted to retire especially from the Bay Area I recommend Sun City Lincoln Hills in Lincoln Ca
I think #5 is supposed to be Mountain House not Mountain View.
Lathrop… Naw I’m Good
Lol
Actually a Nice City 🤡
How are you, including micro homes/tiny homes, walkable towns?
Is there land to buy to place tiny homes that are self supporting while building a bigger home
is it car centric because driving everywhere all the time waste a lot of time🙄🙄
Better than being stuck in trains and buses like sardines in densely populated cities post covid. No thanks.
You bet it is. New development = copy paste homes in the middle of a field in Central California
@@Law19157 you do realize not everyone has the option to drive right and even if that was so it would still be an incredible waste of energy. public transport, better infrastructure and ride sharing all need to be an option to keep congestion down and just improve quality of life.
@@tysupply8408 You talk about congestion while wanting everyone to be densely packed shoulder to shoulder in small spaces, you're talking from both sides of your mouth.
@@Law19157 when did i ever say I wanted people to be shoulder to shoulder? I said not everyone has the option to drive a vehicle, there is no one size fits all for this matter an example living in a urban landscape vs a rural area are going to have different connotations. stop trying make an argument by putting words in peoples mouth
6:21 Mountain View feels odd on that list for sure. Glad to see a close in city actually growing...
This list 5yrs ago probably would have had Dublin and San Ramon on it too but they are pretty much built out...and aren't really affordable anymore...
I think they confused Mountain House, with Mountain View 😂
@@freesoul2005 😂🤣😂
Probably true!
No city will ever grow like roseville did. Roseville went from a dumpy railroad town to one of the best cities in the state
Lot of retirees there now right?
it is a nice city but it is getting very expensive to live here , most new subdivision pay a Mello roos tax on top of their property tax . affordability was one reason I moved from Monterey county and now it is about the same and traffic is getting worse
@@jayralston2305 dont worry its gonna be alot less expensive by 2027 just keep watching the news it has been dull from summer 2020-2024 i know, but its picking up
It sounds nice but the heat and air quality turn me off :/
So, It's actually 6 of the top 10 fastest growing cities in California are in the north. Only 4 of the 6 are covered in this report.
Why didn’t they put up a map to show where these cities are? Viewers have to get out of UA-cam to google map each cities, gosh.
I agree but the broadcast was originally aired on the local Sacramento ABC affiliate so most of their original audience was probably familiar with these northern central valley towns listed.
@@jayell1922 Understood. But like Lathrop is even south to Stockton, and it's so far from Sacramento. I really doubt people know where it is.
@@TYZyi5ss it’s not even 60 miles between Sacramento and Lathrop.
Mountain View!
It’s mountain house, I think
no thanks air quality sucks
it means our cost of living will get expensive
Fastest growing in how many years though?
Lathrop? In the polluted windy Central Valley. Nothing new. The peripheral bedroom communities from the Bay Area moving further and further east. Watch out for cheap and defective tract homes as in all such boom towns (Remember 2008). TBH if Tesla and others are there (not Texas?) makes it an edge city so maybe a more sustainable growth. Maybe.
you bring up 2008 do you have any idea that in the next 1-5 months we are likely to experience the 2nd worst economic meltdown since 1930 ? you dont have to believe me just survive 200 days it wont be long. Theres nothing to "remember" we going have the first wake up call after 16 years the pandemic delayed and messed everything up i been sitting tight for 4 and half years for this day.
Still cali
I hear Marysville, CA is just a lovely town! People should go move over there!
Lathrop is hot.
Hope these city's are careful with development! They maybe creating a city folks will want to leave soon!
Clovis next to Fresno is growing
Lathrop is the best!
Parla!
Lodi ca was cheap and very affordable. Then about 10 years ago the prices started going up the people from the Bay Area started moving up move. I live in a 1 bedroom apartment with my husband and 2 kids. And a former tenant in our apartment #6 just moved further north of California. I believe it was Yuba City California. And the one that moved in 3 months ago is from the Bay Area. They thought 1,300 of rent was pretty cheap because where they lived before was 2, 000 for a 1bedroom apartment there. I think people are just going to keep moving
Too toasty in the interior valley..
tesla did lay off so many peoples
Yuba City
Is full of Punjab’s like me
@@bobsingh5521 There was a festival when I was there Siek or Hindu
@@erich84502a
Sikh parade
Ah yes, the desire for endless growth. Good for the economy.
It's great if regular people have a shot at buying a house if they have a family and that allows them to build generational wealth. It's terrible if you have a giant apartment complex and you pay rent your whole life to a landlord who gets rich while you and your kids will have nothing.
That's why it's important to have balanced population growth where we don't have so many new people that we can no longer give them a good quality of life. That's also why densely populated countries like Japan, South Korea, China, Germany, etc have low birth rates and high alcohol consumption. Too many people, too few resources.
@@aminy23 Balanced population growth? What does that mean? Do you mean building excessively large houses on arable land? It is better to make existing metro areas more livable and affordable. Cars are not getting any cheaper, so car-centric cities don’t make a lot of sense. The United States spends $5 trillion dollars every year to travel by car. A major part of that cost is road infrastructure. Cities like Lathrap are not sustainable longterm. The roads in good condition are usually in new and/or wealthy areas. Roads are maintained by increasing the tax base through constant population growth. When the growth slows, the city will not be able to maintain the roads.
The rate of alcoholism in the United States is the same as South Korea, and a lot higher than Japan and Germany. The is major problem in the United States with meth addiction, including in rural areas. People in the United States are not self medicating due to population density. United States is the only country in the world to have a double digit percentage rate for alcoholism in women.
The only reason that the United States’ population has not stagnated is because of immigration.
@@barryrobbins7694 The model of infinite growth is not sustainable. This is something people around the world realize. The birth rate of Japan, South Korea, China, or Germany is low because the educated people don't want to have an abundance of children whom they can't properly care for.
The problem with extremism of all forms is when we try to needlessly control and micro-manage the lives of others.
I welcome everything productive. If San Francisco wants to build bike paths - that's fine. If California wants to build rail - that's fine. If Oakdale wants a highway - that's fine.
There's no reason we cannot have different shoes for different feet. If a family with 3 kids wants a house, we shouldn't need to punish them. If a single college graduate wants an urban apartment, they shouldn't be punished either.
The problem happens when they turn the people against each other. Asians (myself included) are getting wealthy because we embrace multi-generational living. We don't want to constantly pay our income to a landlord.
When kids go to college, leave their parents, and then pay rent and student loans from 22-50+ - all that liberation just means they're paying out to the rich.
When politicians stop road development, stop developing public transport, stop building affordable housing - their expenses go down, and their revenue stays the same. That lets the revenue go to the wrong pockets.
If places like SF or Oakland actually did their job and built enough homes, and kept people safe - no one would be moving to Lathrop or Roseville.
The people who keep complaining are the people who don't want to actually do the right thing. We can complain about carbon emissions from power - why not build nuclear plants? Why not invest in hydroelectric, solar, and power storage?
If you want to fight highway and road development, why not use that money in public transport instead?
Do it the right way, and people will follow.
@@aminy23 I don’t really disagree with most of what you said. Sprawling car centric development is not the best way forward. As you stated, the fact that people are moving there is an indication of systemic defects in the wider society. The Bay Area should be made more livable.
reading the comments nobody is to worried about the brewing financial crisis/ liquidity crisis thats likely to finally spill over in 2025 after being stalled since march 2020 as well as homes being in bubble very rare in history. It just doesn't look good when not enough people are concerned maybe they got complacent and when this was trending 2 years ago online they just forgot by 2024 oh well.
Those who know KNOW and have found most everyone else have mentally shut down on any negative knowledge.
You can't save them
Dublin is #1
Stay in those California cities instead of relocating to Idaho!
Create a new town called Dicksville