If samsung improved their low res upscaling then the s90d will be a great choice. But since most youtube reviewers never show low res content I guess we'll never know...
The g3 and a95l in the video seem to "trade blows" pretty well with some scenes clearly looking better on each one and a few that are very similar. Both are great TV's.
We're splitting the atom here. For the vast majority of people, what matters is how the TVs process lower bitrate content.. the netflix.. the prime, hulu, espn, cable, etc. I wonder what percentage of buyers have super high quality blue ray players and collections.
@@mootsym It addresses low bit rate content and some processing due to the nature of delivery including how many FPS is being passed through. It's certainly not there to make up for bad motion precessing. But it does fix a few quibbles. I would say that the most obvious benefit is a super fast system and UI to manage your interaction with content.
@@mootsym All good :). You can set it up so when you turn your TV on, it launches straight to Apple TV. You then use Apple TV remote to choose what streaming service or app you want to use etc. So your experience most of the time is using Apple TV. Make sense?
@BladeRunnerJP11. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. I personally enjoyed the g3 in game mode. But yes the colors on the S90D. overall look better and the game mode on the S90D is also brighter. Plus it has color booster. The G3 has a better 3d pop to it.
I have had the S90C for almost a year and just got the S95D. I can confirm the Matte screen is no issue at all for me. This TV is shockingly a big upgrade! So bright and the colors are even more vivid - it's legit eye seering
@@MrBritishComedy How is SDR movies going to look better ? c'mon how ?, How will Blu-ray mastered to 1000 and DCi-p3 look so much better - They won't they all look nearly the same in film maker mode - keep telling yourself fairytales -- yet in vivid bullshit mode the colours will pop , like discordant music. All TVs have their faults , Sony has colour loss in some darker scenes , over processed shimmering artifacts , DV faults . Samsung has some drop outs for some people. Given that you 99% of people would choose a 83" G4 over a Sony or Sammy 77"- so that's the winner by default - Size beats BT2020 every day of the week - Would buy a 50" perfect TV to replace a Sony A95l 77" - no one would - they aren't that stupid , . Sony has stated it's secret sauce is processing . LG , Panasonic and Samsung have up theirs this year - The G4 looks amazing , with 5 years of updates to that amazing processing . Tired of silly comments. For many watching lots of old movies . all these TVs are great . Nearly all people who review these TVs side by side , seem to struggle to see differences in most media , ie they use specific hard to do edge cases to see differences . The red in QD-OLED can get redder , But someone watching the G4 will not notice anything missing . For gaming I think QD-OLED is better , except can get a nice 42" LG with higher NITS . Sony won due to processing . Colour over all is one of the least important factors due to way human perception works . How it's tone mapped, processing , luminance control, contrast , motion handling all have greater realism immersion . No one watched old movies in Technicolor and complained about color they loved it . People just wanted bigger TVs and more resolution All these TVs are stunning no matter the brand . Lets see if Sony's Flagship X95M 85" miniLED can boost BT2020 from 76%/80% from last years model . If they can do that , great black control , that will be a winner for many consumers as well , as meant to be able to do natural 4000NIts tone mapping . Sony made never do QD-OLED again the way Samsung screwed them - high cost to sony , while dumping 77" models on market at a loss . Sony will keep WOLED and push it's miniLED hard 98"/100" will hit your QD-OLED hard . Average punter getting a TCL or Hisense monster with a pretty great image in their opinion for 50% cost of a Sony 77" QD-OLED. Sonys WOLED are reasonably priced like I said Samsung screwed them over. Given that I may look at a 77" Samsung this year if priced well - and faults fixed up All these TVs are amazing . People still rave about their A90J and C1s QD-OLEDS are great - but I think for myself - I want to see that full BT2020 in the gaming space monitors - where creators can really use it and Nvidia now has a HDR mode that works quite well , probably AMD will follow. So you can have your cake and eat it too - eg a monster 100" and a great QD-OLED monitor . Think I wait a year or 2 for a killer monitor 36" maybe near full BT2020 , 360HZ . LG is still invested in WOLED - next year hitting 4000Nits , Blue PhoLED coming , which will be great for QD-OLED as well if fix for longlife and heating . Many of us are movie purist and WOLED is plenty sufficient for 99% of media already made , the C4 83 in dark room would be stunning- full 1000Nits tonemapped , extra BT2020 would just be a cherry on top. Also price ,reliability , warranty , sound , remote , OS , number of ports. looks may be sticking point Our man hear said G3 and A95L were so close and Sony beat it on processing
@nimblegoat 90% of all people don't even have the space to fit an 85 inch TV in the living room of their flat. Obviously, if you fo have the space, then the size will decide. Filmmaker mode is being pushed by so-called experts who are paid by the conglomerate that has created film maker mode, yet it's a 10+ year old format that only makes sure that content looks the same on a cheap TV as it does on any other high-end TV. It hampers the capabilities of modern high-end TVs. And when a director signs off on what their movies are supposed to look like in film maker mode, it's done in conditions that almost no consumer can recreate. It's done in a completely dark room on a reference monitor with the intention to make it look good in a movie theater. Good luck recreating that in your living room. High-end TVs - if set up correctly, give you the ability to make skin tones and colors of all other objects look natural and pleasing to the eye (without oversaturation) in a regular living space, and they can give you a 3D pop, even in SDR - compared to the dim and washed out image of Filmmaker mode that is not designed for your living room. The main advantage of QD-OLED over WOLED is that it doesn't need a white subpixel. LG tries to get their TVs bright using this subpixel together with MLA, do that whites get brighter, however the brightness of other colors doesn't scale up in a linear manner. If you look at a bright flame on a new LG and compare that to a QD-OLED, you will notice that you lose several shades of light yellow in the gradient while the overall picture doesn't appear all too noticeably brighter. The reason why LG have come up with MLA though is that brightness is the number one marketing point for a technology that has pretty much reached it's peak, even if that can be detrimental to the overall picture quality in certain scenes. That is not to say that LG produces garbage, but it pushes an inferior panel technology at a higher price than Samsung, for example. I do, however, predict that the G4 will do well, because a) most people don't really understand the difference between QD-OLED and WOLED, b) Samsung has seriously misstepped with the anti-glare coating on their S95D, and c) the G4 will still be cheaper that the upcoming Sony flagship.
@@MrBritishComedy Thanks for a considered reply . I think BT2020 is a great tool going forward for directors , will be used quicker in gaming . Studios are limited to reference monitors , so best to use the QD-OLED TV itself - search up full BT2020 monitor - i came up blank . I try to recreate the cinema at home , and watch mostly older movies so a C4 or say a Panasonic Z93a 77" would be great for me . I will buy a gaming monitor in a few years and will get a really good QD-OLED. I think sound more important for immersion . Colour is subjective , I think anyone on this years OLEDs would love the colour and would only know something is missing if another TV side by side . Even the LCD monitor in front of me , can produce beautiful images , but another monitor in my house looks even better . If you are on an icy white tundra fo days on end , and see something red , it will be the most saturated red you have ever seen ( lots of examples of this in literature ) . Yet it may only be a pale red , in a vibrant colourful place. Plus to my point , the whole package is important - why the Sony won . Think LG colour mapping will improve , wise use of white sub-pixel . Most colours outside your window have a white element , Leaves are fringed by white light . ambient reflections everywhere . But for burning metal , lasers , fireworks QD-OLED will do it best , no argument there . We are blessed with now good "cheap" options . A good big colour CRT TV in 1970s was really expensive
I got the G3 last week from Amazon. But now I have until the 29th to decide if I want to send it back and get the G4 for a few extra bucks. What should I do??
If you just purchased it I would assume your happy with it and just cherish it because it's a wonderful tv. But if you really want the new extras it provides along with knew processing, then go with g4. It really depends on what's important to you primarily
Which upscales low content like 720 sports better? That will be the deciding factor for me. I thought I heard that the 8K Samsung has the better chip than the S95D and S90D
Hey dude! dying to see Sony a95l vs Lg g4. Hope we can see some different things about game mode and movies on both models, what is best. and if you think Lg g4 is maybe better than sony a95l this year. Is for sony myself but can be changed😀🇩🇰🤘🏼.
There is no A95M coming, and the A95L still looks better than the S95D/S90D ... but you also pay the XR Clear Tax, Samsung's as always will be the best bang for buck, G4 will be the choice for 83" size. This is a year of more incremental Upgrades, last year was more significant because we finally got 77" QD Oleds.
Is it true that no Dolby Vision support on the Samsung doesn't matter anymore because the TV performs to a high enough level that it doesn't need dynamic tone mapping?
The lg g4 Oled is tv which uses over 8.3 million self eliminating pixels that turn off and on to create infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and richer colors. The g4 uses the micro lense array just like the lg g3 but has the meta 2.0 technology which uses a color enhancing technique and algorithms powered by the Alpha 11 gen 10 Ai processor which is 4x more power full than the APLHA 9 on the g3, bringing brighter highlights, better motion,Clarity and finer details like Sony. The lg g3 was measured at 2,180nits peak brightness while g4 can get up to 2,500nits. Lg OLEDS typically last longer than conventional oleds due to their credibility and ownership of making oled panels and suppling them to other manufacturers, they offer 5yrs panel warranty to.
"The lg g4 Oled is tv which uses over 8.3 million self eliminating pixels that turn off and on to create infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and richer colors." And? This describes every 4K OLED TV....
@@Solus793 Yes, does but that just the start off my intro, just stating that doesn’t conclude to anything, and Lg tv tend have the perfect blacks anyway.
It's down to G4 or new Sony MiniLED with the new backlight. I love shadow detail and realistic imagery. Sony is king for that. The LG G4 though seems pretty awesome. The processing improved a lot. I feel it offers more than Samsung QDOLED this year. I know QDOLED has "better colors". But only in the highest brightness levels and that might even be reduced more this year because of processing. The G4 looked more colorful and contrasty compared to G3 and more detailed in some demo presentation video I saw.
I like these tvs but they are too small. TCL has 98” tvs for a good price with all of the features. I love Samsung as well with the S95C. The immersion from a bigger set is different.
Why so optimistic after the G3 had no chance against the S89C/S90C/S95C? The game mode was really miserable and the color brightness of a WOLED is sad.
LG is using old tech. Even the S95C obliterates the G4. Brightness is not everything, especially when the brightness comes from the white subpixel of WOLED. That will always mean that color gradients will suffer.
@MrBritishComedy I've been in AVfourms who own both sets of A95L and G4 and they side with the G4. The QD Oled tech is ahead, but not by am large margin at all.
G4 will win performance wise and as the best OLED. While s90d will win for the best value like last year. The s95d will win in brighter rooms, but Matt finish absorbs the color pop. Don’t trust samsung updates. A95l will continue to will be the 2nd or 1st best after the g4.
If samsung improved their low res upscaling then the s90d will be a great choice. But since most youtube reviewers never show low res content I guess we'll never know...
Even though the Samsung looks insanely good I'm still going for the LG G4. The picture settings on the LG and features are fantastic
The g3 and a95l in the video seem to "trade blows" pretty well with some scenes clearly looking better on each one and a few that are very similar. Both are great TV's.
We're splitting the atom here. For the vast majority of people, what matters is how the TVs process lower bitrate content.. the netflix.. the prime, hulu, espn, cable, etc. I wonder what percentage of buyers have super high quality blue ray players and collections.
If you just get an Apple TV, you will fix most of those issues on any TV. Then you can focus on best panel.
@@exhibitD79 how so? Does it do the smoothing and sharpening for the tv?
@@mootsym It addresses low bit rate content and some processing due to the nature of delivery including how many FPS is being passed through.
It's certainly not there to make up for bad motion precessing. But it does fix a few quibbles.
I would say that the most obvious benefit is a super fast system and UI to manage your interaction with content.
@@exhibitD79 so this as opposed to using the UI that comes with smart TVs? Sorry I know I’m asking dumb questions.
@@mootsym All good :). You can set it up so when you turn your TV on, it launches straight to Apple TV. You then use Apple TV remote to choose what streaming service or app you want to use etc. So your experience most of the time is using Apple TV. Make sense?
Like your style and effort you put in 4 review . Great work keep going. When is the next new gen tv comparison coming up ?
Hello my friend I currently have a Lg G3 is it worth getting a s90D? How much better is it in color/color volume?
@BladeRunnerJP11. Hey thank you for the comment and checking out the video. I personally enjoyed the g3 in game mode. But yes the colors on the S90D. overall look better and the game mode on the S90D is also brighter. Plus it has color booster. The G3 has a better 3d pop to it.
I have had the S90C for almost a year and just got the S95D.
I can confirm the Matte screen is no issue at all for me. This TV is shockingly a big upgrade! So bright and the colors are even more vivid - it's legit eye seering
Greetings from Germany. Hope the G4's game mode turns out well. Unfortunately the G3 performs poorly against the S89C/S90C & S95C :-/
WOLED is old tech. As long as LG sticks with it, they won't be able to beat flagship Samsung and Sony TVs.
@@MrBritishComedy Yes, I think so, too. I am absolutely happy with my S90C and 4 year warranty. But I still find the market development interesting.
@@MrBritishComedy How is SDR movies going to look better ? c'mon how ?, How will Blu-ray mastered to 1000 and DCi-p3 look so much better - They won't they all look nearly the same in film maker mode - keep telling yourself fairytales -- yet in vivid bullshit mode the colours will pop , like discordant music. All TVs have their faults , Sony has colour loss in some darker scenes , over processed shimmering artifacts , DV faults . Samsung has some drop outs for some people. Given that you 99% of people would choose a 83" G4 over a Sony or Sammy 77"- so that's the winner by default - Size beats BT2020 every day of the week - Would buy a 50" perfect TV to replace a Sony A95l 77" - no one would - they aren't that stupid , . Sony has stated it's secret sauce is processing . LG , Panasonic and Samsung have up theirs this year - The G4 looks amazing , with 5 years of updates to that amazing processing . Tired of silly comments. For many watching lots of old movies . all these TVs are great . Nearly all people who review these TVs side by side , seem to struggle to see differences in most media , ie they use specific hard to do edge cases to see differences . The red in QD-OLED can get redder , But someone watching the G4 will not notice anything missing . For gaming I think QD-OLED is better , except can get a nice 42" LG with higher NITS .
Sony won due to processing . Colour over all is one of the least important factors due to way human perception works . How it's tone mapped, processing , luminance control, contrast , motion handling all have greater realism immersion .
No one watched old movies in Technicolor and complained about color they loved it . People just wanted bigger TVs and more resolution
All these TVs are stunning no matter the brand . Lets see if Sony's Flagship X95M 85" miniLED can boost BT2020 from 76%/80% from last years model . If they can do that , great black control , that will be a winner for many consumers as well , as meant to be able to do natural 4000NIts tone mapping .
Sony made never do QD-OLED again the way Samsung screwed them - high cost to sony , while dumping 77" models on market at a loss . Sony will keep WOLED and push it's miniLED hard
98"/100" will hit your QD-OLED hard . Average punter getting a TCL or Hisense monster with a pretty great image in their opinion for 50% cost of a Sony 77" QD-OLED.
Sonys WOLED are reasonably priced like I said Samsung screwed them over.
Given that I may look at a 77" Samsung this year if priced well - and faults fixed up
All these TVs are amazing . People still rave about their A90J and C1s
QD-OLEDS are great - but I think for myself - I want to see that full BT2020 in the gaming space monitors - where creators can really use it and Nvidia now has a HDR mode that works quite well , probably AMD will follow.
So you can have your cake and eat it too - eg a monster 100" and a great QD-OLED monitor . Think I wait a year or 2 for a killer monitor 36" maybe near full BT2020 , 360HZ .
LG is still invested in WOLED - next year hitting 4000Nits , Blue PhoLED coming , which will be great for QD-OLED as well if fix for longlife and heating .
Many of us are movie purist and WOLED is plenty sufficient for 99% of media already made , the C4 83 in dark room would be stunning- full 1000Nits tonemapped , extra BT2020 would just be a cherry on top.
Also price ,reliability , warranty , sound , remote , OS , number of ports. looks may be sticking point
Our man hear said G3 and A95L were so close and Sony beat it on processing
@nimblegoat 90% of all people don't even have the space to fit an 85 inch TV in the living room of their flat. Obviously, if you fo have the space, then the size will decide.
Filmmaker mode is being pushed by so-called experts who are paid by the conglomerate that has created film maker mode, yet it's a 10+ year old format that only makes sure that content looks the same on a cheap TV as it does on any other high-end TV. It hampers the capabilities of modern high-end TVs. And when a director signs off on what their movies are supposed to look like in film maker mode, it's done in conditions that almost no consumer can recreate. It's done in a completely dark room on a reference monitor with the intention to make it look good in a movie theater. Good luck recreating that in your living room.
High-end TVs - if set up correctly, give you the ability to make skin tones and colors of all other objects look natural and pleasing to the eye (without oversaturation) in a regular living space, and they can give you a 3D pop, even in SDR - compared to the dim and washed out image of Filmmaker mode that is not designed for your living room.
The main advantage of QD-OLED over WOLED is that it doesn't need a white subpixel. LG tries to get their TVs bright using this subpixel together with MLA, do that whites get brighter, however the brightness of other colors doesn't scale up in a linear manner. If you look at a bright flame on a new LG and compare that to a QD-OLED, you will notice that you lose several shades of light yellow in the gradient while the overall picture doesn't appear all too noticeably brighter. The reason why LG have come up with MLA though is that brightness is the number one marketing point for a technology that has pretty much reached it's peak, even if that can be detrimental to the overall picture quality in certain scenes.
That is not to say that LG produces garbage, but it pushes an inferior panel technology at a higher price than Samsung, for example. I do, however, predict that the G4 will do well, because a) most people don't really understand the difference between QD-OLED and WOLED, b) Samsung has seriously misstepped with the anti-glare coating on their S95D, and c) the G4 will still be cheaper that the upcoming Sony flagship.
@@MrBritishComedy Thanks for a considered reply . I think BT2020 is a great tool going forward for directors , will be used quicker in gaming . Studios are limited to reference monitors , so best to use the QD-OLED TV itself - search up full BT2020 monitor - i came up blank . I try to recreate the cinema at home , and watch mostly older movies so a C4 or say a Panasonic Z93a 77" would be great for me . I will buy a gaming monitor in a few years and will get a really good QD-OLED. I think sound more important for immersion .
Colour is subjective , I think anyone on this years OLEDs would love the colour and would only know something is missing if another TV side by side . Even the LCD monitor in front of me , can produce beautiful images , but another monitor in my house looks even better .
If you are on an icy white tundra fo days on end , and see something red , it will be the most saturated red you have ever seen ( lots of examples of this in literature ) . Yet it may only be a pale red , in a vibrant colourful place.
Plus to my point , the whole package is important - why the Sony won .
Think LG colour mapping will improve , wise use of white sub-pixel . Most colours outside your window have a white element , Leaves are fringed by white light . ambient reflections everywhere . But for burning metal , lasers , fireworks QD-OLED will do it best , no argument there . We are blessed with now good "cheap" options . A good big colour CRT TV in 1970s was really expensive
I’ll be getting the g4.
Definitely a bot
@@raymondreddington6356 NO. The G4 is the best TV of 2024! PERIOD!
I got the G3 last week from Amazon. But now I have until the 29th to decide if I want to send it back and get the G4 for a few extra bucks. What should I do??
If you just purchased it I would assume your happy with it and just cherish it because it's a wonderful tv. But if you really want the new extras it provides along with knew processing, then go with g4. It really depends on what's important to you primarily
Which upscales low content like 720 sports better? That will be the deciding factor for me. I thought I heard that the 8K Samsung has the better chip than the S95D and S90D
0:50 0:56 I'm going for the LG G4 this year.😊the settings on the G4 are insane.😊
I think the setup should be: G3 on the Left, G4 in the Middle, A95L on the Right
Great video. Are you getting 2024 sets?
Hey dude! dying to see Sony a95l vs Lg g4. Hope we can see some different things about game mode and movies on both models, what is best. and if you think Lg g4 is maybe better than sony a95l this year. Is for sony myself but can be changed😀🇩🇰🤘🏼.
There is no A95M coming, and the A95L still looks better than the S95D/S90D ... but you also pay the XR Clear Tax, Samsung's as always will be the best bang for buck, G4 will be the choice for 83" size. This is a year of more incremental Upgrades, last year was more significant because we finally got 77" QD Oleds.
Is it true that no Dolby Vision support on the Samsung doesn't matter anymore because the TV performs to a high enough level that it doesn't need dynamic tone mapping?
Both are amazing televisions! We are all very lucky and fortunate to be nitpicking over these fine details.
The lg g4 Oled is tv which uses over 8.3 million self eliminating pixels that turn off and on to create infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and richer colors. The g4 uses the micro lense array just like the lg g3 but has the meta 2.0 technology which uses a color enhancing technique and algorithms powered by the Alpha 11 gen 10 Ai processor which is 4x more power full than the APLHA 9 on the g3, bringing brighter highlights, better motion,Clarity and finer details like Sony. The lg g3 was measured at 2,180nits peak brightness while g4 can get up to 2,500nits. Lg OLEDS typically last longer than conventional oleds due to their credibility and ownership of making oled panels and suppling them to other manufacturers, they offer 5yrs panel warranty to.
Nobody can be that much of a fanboy. You either shilling for money or you’re a bot lol
"The lg g4 Oled is tv which uses over 8.3 million self eliminating pixels that turn off and on to create infinite contrast, perfect blacks, and richer colors."
And? This describes every 4K OLED TV....
@@Solus793 Yes, does but that just the start off my intro, just stating that doesn’t conclude to anything, and Lg tv tend have the perfect blacks anyway.
@@tahakhan5167 you sound like a robocall.
The g3 and a95l came in as top two of 2023
It's down to G4 or new Sony MiniLED with the new backlight. I love shadow detail and realistic imagery. Sony is king for that. The LG G4 though seems pretty awesome. The processing improved a lot. I feel it offers more than Samsung QDOLED this year. I know QDOLED has "better colors". But only in the highest brightness levels and that might even be reduced more this year because of processing. The G4 looked more colorful and contrasty compared to G3 and more detailed in some demo presentation video I saw.
Lol its not 😅
Hope you're doing well!
I like these tvs but they are too small. TCL has 98” tvs for a good price with all of the features. I love Samsung as well with the S95C. The immersion from a bigger set is different.
Samsungs quality control and customer service are so bad that I dont care how good their panels are. Its a gamble buying their products
I think the G4 will be tv of the year.
The King Sony is not out yet so.........
@@Soclean07 Sony doesn't release the A95M this year...
@@Soclean07 Sony is not my king. Dolby Vision issues, processing that cant be disabled, highest price compared to everyone, no thanks.
G4 ALL THE WAY SMOKING SAMSUNG THIS YEAR
Why so optimistic after the G3 had no chance against the S89C/S90C/S95C? The game mode was really miserable and the color brightness of a WOLED is sad.
Frame generation even on my s95b beats every other brand it makes (service menu tweak) my 60 fbs games run 144hz or similar
LG is using old tech. Even the S95C obliterates the G4. Brightness is not everything, especially when the brightness comes from the white subpixel of WOLED. That will always mean that color gradients will suffer.
Your S95B does not beat the G4 lol. @@uusrikas
@MrBritishComedy I've been in AVfourms who own both sets of A95L and G4 and they side with the G4. The QD Oled tech is ahead, but not by am large margin at all.
G4 will win performance wise and as the best OLED. While s90d will win for the best value like last year. The s95d will win in brighter rooms, but Matt finish absorbs the color pop. Don’t trust samsung updates. A95l will continue to will be the 2nd or 1st best after the g4.
oh look at that. mr know it all. 🙄
This is some nasty clickbait. No S90D or G4 in this video.
Too bad US don’t get Anasonic oled TV’s. They are really incredible
especially for gaming I would take S90D instead of a G4.
no
@@dwight2310qd oled can't be beat in hdr gaming