Well he actually recovered didn't he? It got my heart up to my throat but he did somehow. I think. I'm still not quite sure because even though this is a recording of a flight simulation I'm shocked and in disbelief.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking, we are landing a little earlier than expected, keep your seatbelts (if you have one) fastened and tray tables upright. And I would like to thank you for flying Spirit Airlines
@@chaneIIreal. Everyone likes to dog on Spirit for bad flying or safety when they have one of the most stellar records in the industry. Of all the things to bash them for (even jokingly), this ain't it.
@@floseatyard8063 the A320 can stall like this too if certain things happen, like with AF447. The only difference is that the pilots weren't purposely setting this scenario up. But an Airbus it wouldn't fare that much better in direct law and probably not even in alternate law. I do wonder how the 777/787 FBW systems would handle this specific scenario. Those systems sound like they give more direct control to pilots, but probably not 737 levels of control.
That's actually a safety feature of the plane. The deeper and longer the stall is more and more indicators start turning off eventually only leaving the artificial horizon showing up, to help the pilot focus on getting the plane back to a normal flying state
Well that was terrifying. The airspeed dropped below 200 and I was thinking "Here we go". Then the airspeed exceeded 500 and I was thinking "My name is Jamar I comefrom afar."
Even though its only a simulator it's absolutely sickening and disorientating, credit to the pilots who put themselves through it to prepare for such an event
Like for those on AF447, but they were probably too panicked to even notice the warnings and the noise from the wind hitting the aircraft. Still sad though..
@Parallax no they didn't have any contradictory alarms until the end almost. The stall warning for the first 70 times was not contradictory. They should of listened the first 70 times. Get under 60 knots and all sorts of weird things happen
0:00 Overspeed 0:36 Extreme Pitch Up 0:46 Stall & Bank angle 1:04 Flying Inverted 1:10 Flying right side up again 1:12 Bank Angle 1:27 Overspeed 2:24 Level Flight
Pilot Responsibility and Authority The pilot-in-command of an aircraft is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of that aircraft. In an emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot-in-command may deviate from any rule in 14 CFR Part 91, Subpart A, General, and Subpart B, Flight Rules, to the extent required to meet that emergency.
Mach 0.7 is actually normal cruising speed at high altitude. It's the airspeed(wind force) of 400+ knots that's the problem. At about 22,000ft mach 0.7 is 310 knots IAS.
+Landis Dahlien The 737 is a monster. In 1988 a Brazilian 737 was hijacked in mid-flight and the pilot to knock out the kidnapper made a series of "tonneaus" with the plane. And survive to tell the history.
Wrong title; A deep stall can occur in some T-tailed aircraft. This type of tail the airflow from the stalled wing can blanket the horizontal tail making it impossible to get the nose down.
+Cipriano Kritzinger Yes you are right that deep stall is more predominant in T- tailed aircraft but at such a high angle of attack(more 60 degrees pitch in this video),there will be no airflow over the horizontal stabilizer making it a deep stall.
+Jageera45 In this simulator exercise the AOA was far away from even close to high AOAs. The pilot converted kinetic energy into potential energy. The pitch attitude was high however the AOA was less than 10 deg at 70 deg deck angle. Look at the climb rate and speed. The IAS at 70 deg deck angle was 258 kts equals around 335 KTAS and a climb rate was just above above 10000 fpm with a forward speed of 33925 fpm. The Flight path angle was at least 60 deg consequently the AOA was 10 deg or even less. To calculate the flight path angle accurately the Ground Speed is required as well. Zooming vertically the AOA is negative on an unsymmetrical. To perform such maneuvers simulators are useless and misleading.
Spyke0511 While what was shown in this video isn't a deep stall. A deep stall can happen in many types of aircraft not just 'T-tail' aircraft. To be considered a deep stall, the requirements are a pitch angle and angle of attack that causes the wings to block normal airflow to the horizontal stabilizer and elevators. Rendering them useless. While 'T'tail' aircraft are more susceptible to deep stalls because they can occur with a lower pitch and angle of attack than more common designs. It is not a prerequisite that to be considered a deep stall the aircraft must have a 'T-tail' design.
According to the Mach meter which was still functioning after the ADC (air data computer) went out of range, they reached a top speed of 536KIAS. Realistically, the Boeing 737 is a very strong aircraft, so it might have even survived up until that point, however they would have likely experienced "mach tuck", which means the tail becomes less effective as it goes transsonic, causing the nose to uncontrollably dive down, further increasing speed until impact. Control surfaces are usually the first thing to rip off the airframe, as they have the weakest (comparatively) attach points, and could suffer from an aerodynamic effect known as "flutter", causing them to suddenly begin to vibrate violently before ripping off the attachment points... In addition, the overspeed likely could have been avoided had the recovery been much more prompt, with the wings being levelled immediately as soon as roll control was available, and then a max G pull-up was began to zero degrees pitch.
@@job9650 Sort of like that, yes. Flutter also means that the control surface (the part of the tail that moves) is vibrating back and forth on its hinges, flipping up and down rapidly. That feeling of your hand out the window is somewhat accurate, except it's nearly at the speed of sound compared to however fast your car's going. The aerodynamic forces at that speed would make the fluttering happen and the stress would tear apart the airplane. It happened to a 747 decades ago and it just barely survived. This sort of thing brought down many of the early attempts to break the sound barrier in the 1940s, and killed many pilots.
John Lee How many accidents might have been prevented if more people spent time understanding the full spread of the envelope. Especially in high performance aircraft where the margins are so quick to exceed?
The purpose of doing the 'stupid acts' in a simulator is so that they can be avoided in real life ( or in the most extremely unlikely scenario, survived )
After watching decades of PULL UP - TERRRAIN!!! videos that did not end well, this freaked me out until I realized it was a torture session in a simulator. Wow. Now I can watch and wth you did... you saved it.
He didn't "save" it. You see that mach number under the airspeed indicator? During recovery, after the airspeed indicator disappeared, it went as high as mach .876, which comes out to 584 knots. I'm sorry but if this were a real airplane the wings would have sheared off and the fuselage would have disintegrated long before reaching that speed, and everybody on board would have died. Deep stalls are generally considered unrecoverable for a reason.
@@BuilderBob1 You're right... I watched this again recently and before seeing your reply I was like, no way they saved this thing without having the wings ripped off. But it was still cool that they didn't crash it.
Yes it can be done (recovery from 90 degree nose up, aka going vertical), see Interflug A310 Incident in Moscow, 1991, and look at the FDR reconstruction video.
Me: *on Ryanair flight* Ryanair Pilot: Alright, we are making our final descent, buckle your seatbelts and brace for impact. Me: Oh finally! I'm going to land saf- Ryanair Pilot: 1:13
the thing with these kinds of stalls on high altitudes is not the stall itself, as it is relatively not hard to recover from it. the problem is with the high G forces and stresses the aircraft's fuselage and wings face, which can lead of them being severely damaged, and thus, causing a crash.
You can not extrapulate flying performance outside the normal flying envelope from a simulator, they're not programmed for example a boeing 737 tailslide.
It's been years, but I want to remember that a fully developed "deep stall" is almost impossible to recover from. T-tail Aircraft have a history of these very rare and almost always deadly stalls. It's because the horizontal stabilizer has now stalled and the elevator is no longer functioning. This means the main wings are still producing lift but the aircraft is still climbing. Several years ago an Air France Airbus A330 crashed after entering into a deep stall. Everybody on board died!
You're confusing two types of deep stall. T-tail aircraft have a unique stall condition where the wings block airflow over the horizontal stabiliser so the pilots pitching commands are negated. The aircraft is stuck in a nose up attitude until either a change in profile through the air or a lithobraking event. Air France flight 447 was a conventional stall that wasn't handled correctly.
Neither the 737 nor A330 are T-tail aircraft; a better example would be West Caribbean Airways flight 708, an MD-80 which entered a deep stall and crashed
Issam Mejdoubi You haz the werry best engrish det I herd. You are wrong I am a student pilot, and maybe in your parent's country they dont maintain the aircraft so well that it can handle one OVSPD, honestly, it only went til m .87 that is like a certified flutter test speed... in this case it happened closer to the ground. I believe the 737 is designed to withstand this situation.
@@NikanDragosysSerpenDra Please never graduate. "It can handle one OVSP". Your engrish iz werry bestest too. What about 2 OVSPDs? Three would be too much? ROFL
A stall in an airplane occurs when the aircraft's wings lose lift due to an excessive angle of attack, disrupting the smooth airflow and potentially leading to loss of control.
Ngl this thing's airframe is reliable as hell. Not only is it able to go almost 100kts faster than its limit, it can also pull a 10G in such a stunningly short time😂
Btw they are doing the 'stall maneuver'. They're experiencing a 'deep stall' or 'irreversible stall'. Once the plane reach this kind of situation big big chance you won't make it. They purposely aggressively sway the plane to right & left which triggered the 'bank angle' alert. This is to reduce the pitch of the nose where it loses lift. In this case we can assume that the plane situations had worsen, nose down & dropping down. The worst kind of stall. The clicking sound are indication of 'overspeed' on the turbine. The only way you get this issue is when the nose is pointing to the ground.
Recovery? The only thing you would be able to recover after that is the black boxes.
LOL
im happy that that is only a simulator ;D
LOL
Aero drag*
Well he actually recovered didn't he? It got my heart up to my throat but he did somehow. I think.
I'm still not quite sure because even though this is a recording of a flight simulation I'm shocked and in disbelief.
Plane: *exceeds 500 knots*
Wings: Understandable, have a nice day.
Lmao
You're assuming they didn't just snap off when the airframe just snaps inverted going ass over teakettle *twice*.
Speed indicator: yeah you too
I even fly 737-800 to 540 knots. It's flight simulator
hold j to leave your aircraft
from now so on, i will travel in simulators only. they are so robust and never break up into pieces with super high stress.
LOL , I was thinking the same!
Juan Carlos Sosa Muy same hahahahaha
Travel in simulators lol
Matrix.
Me too
737: Exceeds 500+ knots
*New level unlocked: concorde power*
New gamemode unlocked:
*A I R F O R C E P R O U D 9 5*
I am sure they were at supersonic speed
@@z1990s no doubt
This was done in a flight simulator
@@Unknown_Ooh everyone knows
Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking, we are landing a little earlier than expected, keep your seatbelts (if you have one) fastened and tray tables upright. And I would like to thank you for flying Spirit Airlines
Ironically spirit never had a crash
@@chaneIIreal. Everyone likes to dog on Spirit for bad flying or safety when they have one of the most stellar records in the industry. Of all the things to bash them for (even jokingly), this ain't it.
@ChristopherBurtraw and the fact that spirit flies a320s not 737s so this is defo not what a spirit pilot would see
@@floseatyard8063 the A320 can stall like this too if certain things happen, like with AF447. The only difference is that the pilots weren't purposely setting this scenario up. But an Airbus it wouldn't fare that much better in direct law and probably not even in alternate law.
I do wonder how the 777/787 FBW systems would handle this specific scenario. Those systems sound like they give more direct control to pilots, but probably not 737 levels of control.
@@ChristopherBurtraw I meant the cockpit and gpws were different
stick shaker sound + computer voice saying "terrain terrain, pull up, pull up" is one of the most terrifying noise combos out there.
It's called GPWS not computer voice
@@gigachad3327 thats such a petty error tho
Stickshaker: *Activates *
Computer: Terrain, Terrain! Pull Up, Pull Up!
*CURRENT OBJECTIVE: SURVIVE*
@@737Garrus GPWS
@@737Garrus GPWS.
*_Thank you for flying with Ryanair!_*
Underrated
@@GetcG2000 stfu
@@joaquinvm_027_1 come on dude.... stop...get some help
Lmao
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Moment of Silence for whoever was in the bathroom
Lol 😂
RIP
1:20 ignoring the fact this maneuver alone is +10Gs, yeah he and basically everyone without a pressure suit is either dead/blacked out.
Xd
*muffled* “HOLY SHIT, WAS THERE AN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI IN THE SKY, SHITS EVERYWHERE OH MY GOD HELP”
Pilot: "How fast are we going??"
PFD: "Yes"
Plane: *exceeds 580 knots*
Concorde and Tu-144: *Finally, a worthy opponent!*
450+knots overspeed? That plane is no longer a plane. It's pieces of metal dropping from the sky.
Metal? All I could see was a plane now it's gone.
And a few human meat falling from the skies
@@WOI436
Maybe some of them alive
@@cayden2744 yea maybe,but quite rare
@@WOI436
Flight 593
Airbus 310 handled 2 deep stall, didn't recovered the second bcz doesn't had enough altittude
*_G FORCES_* _Wants to know your location_
*Law of physics has left the chat*
What happened? Did fsx invade that plane?
nVidia GForce, the way its meant to be played
Plot twist: he was using an nvidia geforce card
@mena sitota lmao what?
You know you're too fast when the speed indicator just says "SPD"
ias = yes
Should say "FKD"
Cause the pitot tube is gone.
That's actually a safety feature of the plane. The deeper and longer the stall is more and more indicators start turning off eventually only leaving the artificial horizon showing up, to help the pilot focus on getting the plane back to a normal flying state
@@visionist7 lol
You know it’s gonna get bad when a stall video starts with an overspeed warning
Well that was terrifying.
The airspeed dropped below 200 and I was thinking "Here we go".
Then the airspeed exceeded 500 and I was thinking "My name is Jamar I comefrom afar."
Bro I was thinking they were tryna crash the plane bro
Allahu Akbar?
Your Boeing 737 is more than qualified for a red-bull race
Lol
PL Sec SS no f***ing s**t
the 737 can't fly a Red Bull air race because the aircraft doesn't have the Red Bull stiker
@PL Sec SS I know you are talking to the other guy but I just want to say sorry for the r/woooosh I've always wanted to do that and yeah sorry :)
@@jusezaba8557 please stop using these terms on youtube
This is the everyday life in FSX Multiplayer
No real planes were harmed during this video.
Welcome to Steam Edition
@Plexit no way, where is the hot air ballon doing over 300 knots?
@@gabrielmoura_GMI Right behind Tower, helping 747 with Exorcism on the ramp
I see we are all men of culture... *cough cough* AFP95 *cough cough*
Passengers: ight imma black out
There brain cells:aight imma die
their pp: shit **leaks**
Me: ohhhhh shit plane: dies
LOL
Black out before I tap out bitchhhhh ""
450+ knots. You have achieved *Speed*.
Even though its only a simulator it's absolutely sickening and disorientating, credit to the pilots who put themselves through it to prepare for such an event
Really eerie noises, especially considering this is likely some of the last noises some pilots will ever hear.
Like for those on AF447, but they were probably too panicked to even notice the warnings and the noise from the wind hitting the aircraft. Still sad though..
This is exactly why GPWS and stick-shaker sounds give me the worst fucking chills. Literally I break out in a cold sweat when I hear this.
This is a flight training area so no need to worry
@Parallax no they didn't have any contradictory alarms until the end almost. The stall warning for the first 70 times was not contradictory. They should of listened the first 70 times. Get under 60 knots and all sorts of weird things happen
you want it to start making a happy jingle or something?
Awesome stall recovery, you just have to pull 8G's at 900 KIAS and hope the wings don't rip off they make it look easy!
8 G's in an airliner lmao. It would disintegrate, the pilots would pass out and so would everyone else in the plane even if it didnt
HHAAHHAHAHAHAHAA
Hahahahaha
I think it would be more than 8Gs. Because I tried this in infinite flight lol and I pulled 15 G’s
@@rykehuss3435 Congratulations, you responded to sarcasm with complete seriousness
Imagine you are dying and the last thing you’re hearing is *”PULL UP”*
This was the case for many pilots
For flying too low?
Pull up your soul to heaven
@The king of Earth no you can't. you can just turn volume up and down a tiny bit and change modes of gpws.
That was exactly the case of Aeroperu 603. In fact, there's several CVR records on youtube if you want to hear those.
This is your Captain Chatopadhaya - Thanks for Flying with SpiceJet.
Plane: Gets as slow as a normal car
Stall: I guess you remember where i’ve been
*Samir! You're breaking the plane!*
Lmfaooooooooo
*shut up, dont tell me how to fly*
@@theodorebintang3312 😂😂😂
Shaddup
Hahahhaa
0:00 Overspeed
0:36 Extreme Pitch Up
0:46 Stall & Bank angle
1:04 Flying Inverted
1:10 Flying right side up again
1:12 Bank Angle
1:27 Overspeed
2:24 Level Flight
Tô Oi
they should of throttled down and made the aircraft slower and throttling the engines down would prevent the aircraft from pitching up
@@Old_Gunslinger_Wild_Bill lol
All the greatest hits. Doing God's work with the timestamps. Thanks.
Hotel? Trivago
You broke an FAA rule exceeding 250KTS below 10,000FT. The rest of it was stellar.
Pilot Responsibility and Authority
The pilot-in-command of an aircraft is directly responsible for and is the final authority as to the operation of that aircraft. In an emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot-in-command may deviate from any rule in 14 CFR Part 91, Subpart A, General, and Subpart B, Flight Rules, to the extent required to meet that emergency.
Pretty sure diving like a fighter and ripping the wings off is a bit of a stretch for emergency operations
@@greensheen8759Listen when you have snakes on your plane that's the only card you have left to play
FAA doesn’t have any power outside the US
@@greensheen8759he went into OCF, so he really didn’t have control over his nose-down attitude after he induced the stall and didn’t recover.
Plane : reaches mach .70
The wings : thank you for shopping at walmart
Underrated comment
Mach 0.7 is actually normal cruising speed at high altitude. It's the airspeed(wind force) of 400+ knots that's the problem. At about 22,000ft mach 0.7 is 310 knots IAS.
mach 0.7 in a boeing 😭
REKIETA, PULL UP, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD PULL UP, REKIETA PULL UP
there is no hope not like ths rekieta bros
He will pull up the balldo.
Rekieta's plane crashed with no survivors.
For the first 20 seconds, I was concerned that this was real
Lol
Wait I thought it was...
@@charliec193 you can see the "windshield" flickering
@@charliec193 its a simulator lol
@@butterthatlandingplss1748 but u dont understand the altineter is real until he showed the screen of simulation
1:31 ...aaaand, you're dead. Hard to fly a 737 with no tail or wings after they've been shorn off from overstress.
737 can handle
@@cayden2744 mhm. because a 737 can handle pulling 10+ Gs at mach .87. fuck off will you
Wings would've come off not long after hitting 300kts though :S
@@gordo1163
So why a fking a310 can take (flight 593)?
@@cayden2744 can handle huh? Adam air flight 574 disagree with that
Plane: *exceeds 450 knots*
Wings: I guess I’ll die.
in simulator I fly a Boeing 737 almost 550 knots. and wings still okay lol
@@loveplane737 probably you're flying at 38000+ ft? Because if the air is thinner the drag will not be stressful for the airframe
@@culardodiroflova8576 i fly below 5000ft
@@loveplane737 what sim do you use?
@@culardodiroflova8576 x plane 10 in mobile
Aside from the excessive speed ide say that was a perfect deep stall recovery
Он не может считаться идеальным, потому что пилоты допустили критическое превышение скорости
Then I hope you're never in the L seat of any plane I am in the back of.
First: overspeed
Second: stall
Third: bank angle
End:terrain pull up2
And that's GG 😢
Pilot:”what’s the speed??”
Pfd:”no”
warp 1
@@Petr75661 Might as well be warp 10.
@@user2C47 Salamander time
Hyper space
So basically, the Boeing 737 is a stunt plane.
+Sean Luo Not really, but they will do really nice barrel rolls too.
yup
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHAHA
1:42 mach .87 in a 737? this belongs in an Airforceproud95 video XD
Hmmm
DankComments But it's a mach 0.87 at low altitude, not at cruising altitude.
Blog it.
A Concorde can handle this safely.
It has a maximum speed of 1350 MPH.
Fly Heading 69 to the blog via sauceboss intersection
0:01 over speed “clacking” alarm- used when speed is too high
Overspeed, Stall and Terrain warning altogether is scary to the next level
Don't think this aircraft would handle the stresses in real life.....
+Landis Dahlien The 737 is a monster. In 1988 a Brazilian 737 was hijacked in mid-flight and the pilot to knock out the kidnapper made a series of "tonneaus" with the plane. And survive to tell the history.
A Concorde would handle this safely.
It has a maximum speed of 1350 MPH.
Acabei de pensar no VASP!
Flight 593
@@opimentoso why I've never heard of that?
Wrong title; A deep stall can occur in some T-tailed aircraft. This type of tail the airflow from the stalled wing can blanket the horizontal tail making it impossible to get the nose down.
+Cipriano Kritzinger Yes you are right that deep stall is more predominant in T- tailed aircraft but at such a high angle of attack(more 60 degrees pitch in this video),there will be no airflow over the horizontal stabilizer making it a deep stall.
+Jageera45 In this simulator exercise the AOA was far away from even close to high AOAs. The pilot converted kinetic energy into potential energy. The pitch attitude was high however the AOA was less than 10 deg at 70 deg deck angle. Look at the climb rate and speed. The IAS at 70 deg deck angle was 258 kts equals around 335 KTAS and a climb rate was just above above 10000 fpm with a forward speed of 33925 fpm. The Flight path angle was at least 60 deg consequently the AOA was 10 deg or even less. To calculate the flight path angle accurately the Ground Speed is required as well. Zooming vertically the AOA is negative on an unsymmetrical. To perform such maneuvers simulators are useless and misleading.
Cipriano Kritzinger Mmm. O
The first one is the overspeed warning, then bank angel, followed by stickshaker
Spyke0511 While what was shown in this video isn't a deep stall. A deep stall can happen in many types of aircraft not just 'T-tail' aircraft. To be considered a deep stall, the requirements are a pitch angle and angle of attack that causes the wings to block normal airflow to the horizontal stabilizer and elevators. Rendering them useless. While 'T'tail' aircraft are more susceptible to deep stalls because they can occur with a lower pitch and angle of attack than more common designs. It is not a prerequisite that to be considered a deep stall the aircraft must have a 'T-tail' design.
According to the Mach meter which was still functioning after the ADC (air data computer) went out of range, they reached a top speed of 536KIAS.
Realistically, the Boeing 737 is a very strong aircraft, so it might have even survived up until that point, however they would have likely experienced "mach tuck", which means the tail becomes less effective as it goes transsonic, causing the nose to uncontrollably dive down, further increasing speed until impact. Control surfaces are usually the first thing to rip off the airframe, as they have the weakest (comparatively) attach points, and could suffer from an aerodynamic effect known as "flutter", causing them to suddenly begin to vibrate violently before ripping off the attachment points...
In addition, the overspeed likely could have been avoided had the recovery been much more prompt, with the wings being levelled immediately as soon as roll control was available, and then a max G pull-up was began to zero degrees pitch.
Is flutter like when u put your hand out of the window of a car and ur hand starts to vibrate? Or ami being stupid heh
@@job9650 Sort of like that, yes. Flutter also means that the control surface (the part of the tail that moves) is vibrating back and forth on its hinges, flipping up and down rapidly. That feeling of your hand out the window is somewhat accurate, except it's nearly at the speed of sound compared to however fast your car's going. The aerodynamic forces at that speed would make the fluttering happen and the stress would tear apart the airplane. It happened to a 747 decades ago and it just barely survived. This sort of thing brought down many of the early attempts to break the sound barrier in the 1940s, and killed many pilots.
you sure?
Kind of like what the pilots of Federal Express Flight 705 experienced.
Yes.
a am sitting on the toilet taking a dump and from that video it went out very smoothly. Highly recommended for excretion!
Windshear warning+ Stall warning is a nice combo
This is the most entertaining thing I’ve seen in a sim. Top to bottom airspeed limits. You guys should be test pilot’s for whoever you fly for.
Why do you believe that apostrophes play a part in plurals?
That isn't how you use an apostrophe. You're supposed to write "pilots" for plurals and "pilot's" for singular possessive.
“Oh, Flight Attendant, can I trouble you for another cup of coffee? I seemed to have spilled mine. Thank you.”
- Psychologist: The "Pull Up voice" doesn't exist, it can't hurt you.
The *PULL UP voice:*
0:00 overspeed
0:46 stalling alarm
0:47 BANK ANGLE!
1:04 stalling again
1:16 BANK ANGLE
1:27 OVER SPEED & TERRAIN PULL UP
Dude, you broke the simulator!
737: Overspeed followed by 90 pitch up,stall,tail slide and recovery from nearly 70 nose down
Pilots: *kalm*
When in doubt, unplug the power cable
Note that this should not be called a stall recovery. It should be called occupying simulator for stupid acts.
John Lee How many accidents might have been prevented if more people spent time understanding the full spread of the envelope. Especially in high performance aircraft where the margins are so quick to exceed?
Congress just mandated all airline pilots go through full stall & upset training in 2018. Its gonna be interesting!
The purpose of doing the 'stupid acts' in a simulator is so that they can be avoided in real life ( or in the most extremely unlikely scenario, survived )
He’s Air Show Pilot??
ua-cam.com/video/L2CsO-Vu7oc/v-deo.html
After watching decades of PULL UP - TERRRAIN!!! videos that did not end well, this freaked me out until I realized it was a torture session in a simulator. Wow.
Now I can watch and wth you did... you saved it.
He didn't "save" it. You see that mach number under the airspeed indicator? During recovery, after the airspeed indicator disappeared, it went as high as mach .876, which comes out to 584 knots. I'm sorry but if this were a real airplane the wings would have sheared off and the fuselage would have disintegrated long before reaching that speed, and everybody on board would have died. Deep stalls are generally considered unrecoverable for a reason.
Is realized it was a simulator based on how the windows were flickering and the fact the plane didn’t get obliterated at those speeds
@@BuilderBob1 You're right... I watched this again recently and before seeing your reply I was like, no way they saved this thing without having the wings ripped off. But it was still cool that they didn't crash it.
Wings: it’s been a long day without you my friend…
I'd be amazed if that was recoverable in a real 737, the forces would have caused massive structural damage or even wing separation.
Forces probably would have ripped the craft apart well before any pilot could have an ice cube’s chance in hell at recovery
ua-cam.com/video/L2CsO-Vu7oc/v-deo.html done here
Yes it can be done (recovery from 90 degree nose up, aka going vertical), see Interflug A310 Incident in Moscow, 1991, and look at the FDR reconstruction video.
Absolutely recoverable, if done right.
This was not done right.
My initial reaction was how obnoxious the stick shaker is, until I remembered that's the point!
If it had been a real plane would probably be dead and we would Displaying your case Mayday airline Disaster! :)
"BANK ANGLE, BANK ANGLE"
+The786legend WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP
If It had been a real plane they wouldn't be recording :/
If yes i will watch it
*Dramatic music as plane crashes, screen goes black*
Probably something every pilot ever fears hearing.
I’m a captain for ryanair. I always hear that sound when i land? It can’t be a stall
At those stresses I thin you would be flying half a 737
A Boeing 368-500
"not to worry, we are still flying half a ship"
Dark Span 😂
@@Flakfire another happy landing
@@harsh.sharmaboeing 73.7 💀
I missed the part of the airframe breaking up....
Speed 450,the plane will already be Sparta before "PULL-UP".
Love how the speedometer just dies halfway through
this video. uploaded
Ryanair jokes: here i am
Turns out now you don’t even need a simulator to do this. Just fly on a 737 MAX.
lmao
With Mcas turned off
The airspeed indicator went INCREDIBLE AIN'T IT???
lol. the airplane would be disintegrated first.
+Deadbush
wing break in 2 parts....
im the 300th like
0:48 Literally going space shuttle status
XD
Ryanair needs to hire these people
1:33 And the Pitot broke away...
It did not broke away..... it was simple not in range anymore. 450knots is the max on the speed tape
*wings, elevators, and vertical stabilizer have left the chat*
Me: *on Ryanair flight*
Ryanair Pilot: Alright, we are making our final descent, buckle your seatbelts and brace for impact.
Me: Oh finally! I'm going to land saf-
Ryanair Pilot: 1:13
MrSmileyRB is Ryanair really that bad?
OMG TRUE LOL 😂
The lucky One321 They’re actually very safe... but there’s been a long standing trend to make jokes like this.. tbf a lot of them are funny.
The lucky One321 a poorly recorded landing gave birth to the joke
Ryanair doesnt do that anymore you joke.They make better landings
“How to atomize a commercial airliner”. That was intense.
the thing with these kinds of stalls on high altitudes is not the stall itself, as it is relatively not hard to recover from it. the problem is with the high G forces and stresses the aircraft's fuselage and wings face, which can lead of them being severely damaged, and thus, causing a crash.
You can not extrapulate flying performance outside the normal flying envelope from a simulator, they're not programmed for example a boeing 737 tailslide.
It's been years, but I want to remember that a fully developed "deep stall" is almost impossible to recover from. T-tail Aircraft have a history of these very rare and almost always deadly stalls. It's because the horizontal stabilizer has now stalled and the elevator is no longer functioning. This means the main wings are still producing lift but the aircraft is still climbing. Several years ago an Air France Airbus A330 crashed after entering into a deep stall. Everybody on board died!
You're confusing two types of deep stall. T-tail aircraft have a unique stall condition where the wings block airflow over the horizontal stabiliser so the pilots pitching commands are negated. The aircraft is stuck in a nose up attitude until either a change in profile through the air or a lithobraking event.
Air France flight 447 was a conventional stall that wasn't handled correctly.
A 737 is not a t-tail aircraft.
Neither the 737 nor A330 are T-tail aircraft; a better example would be West Caribbean Airways flight 708, an MD-80 which entered a deep stall and crashed
@@mattd6085 wasnt the airfrance Crash a flatspin?
This would cause some serious damage to both passengers and airframe.
Henoik and the ground below them
lmao
The things the guys in the simulator are doing in this video would legit just break the plane apart
Lady and gentleman we have arrived in Ryan air some how
Love how the airspeed indicator just gives up
20k feet to 5k. Most people will have no idea how deadly this video almost was.
almost? my man overspeeded so much the damn speed tape broke he didn't recover shit
someone gonna tell them?
respect to cameraman for keeping balance
When all of the speed tape just turned to saying SPD. I felt that.
RyanAir : You have been hired as an aircraft Commander
I Never thought Stick shaker would be that loud.
The amount of GeForce applied would’ve broke the plane in real world, considering the overspeed during the recovery
0:40 knew the sound was coming, but it still scared the f out of me
Meanwhile passengers: aaaaaaaaaaaaaa we going to die
Pilots: its free Real estate
So this is what GTA characters hear while i drive planes
I think you just broke the sound barrier 👍
Oh so this is what it's like to fly onboard the 737 MAX
Wait... wouldn't the stresses on the aircraft during all of this have torn it apart?
Yes, odds are it never would've survived the initial overspeed
It would have survived the initial overspeed...it's the .87 mach later on in the video that would have been...problematic.
opmike343 that two handed pull up at M.87+ tho! 😂
It's only a really good simulator
bro’s 737 can dogfight better than a F-16
Airspeed indicator just gave up. And that altimeter was seriously scary how quickly it was going down.
Even in FSX you would crash lol
Issam Mejdoubi that's because their crash model sucks.
No, cause if you go so overspeed that the speed indicator fails you will definitely broke the fuselage of the aircraft it can't afford such pression
Issam Mejdoubi
You haz the werry best engrish det I herd.
You are wrong
I am a student pilot, and maybe in your parent's country they dont maintain the aircraft so well that it can handle one OVSPD, honestly, it only went til m .87 that is like a certified flutter test speed... in this case it happened closer to the ground.
I believe the 737 is designed to withstand this situation.
Issam Mejdoubi You just got shut down
@@NikanDragosysSerpenDra Please never graduate. "It can handle one OVSP". Your engrish iz werry bestest too. What about 2 OVSPDs? Three would be too much? ROFL
0:55 how could the plane go higher and slower at same time
A stall in an airplane occurs when the aircraft's wings lose lift due to an excessive angle of attack, disrupting the smooth airflow and potentially leading to loss of control.
Gravity
FSX settings:
Aircraft stress causes damage = NO
Ngl this thing's airframe is reliable as hell. Not only is it able to go almost 100kts faster than its limit, it can also pull a 10G in such a stunningly short time😂
Btw they are doing the 'stall maneuver'. They're experiencing a 'deep stall' or 'irreversible stall'. Once the plane reach this kind of situation big big chance you won't make it. They purposely aggressively sway the plane to right & left which triggered the 'bank angle' alert. This is to reduce the pitch of the nose where it loses lift. In this case we can assume that the plane situations had worsen, nose down & dropping down. The worst kind of stall. The clicking sound are indication of 'overspeed' on the turbine. The only way you get this issue is when the nose is pointing to the ground.
Why is this so satisfying
Sean Luo yeah, and I'm a pilot