Nouman Ali Khan & His Associates: Advocate For The Weakening of Masculinity of The Muslim Men
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
- Nouman Ali Khan & His Associates: Advocate For The Weakening of Masculinity of The Muslim Men
نؤمان علي خان وأمثاله: يدعون إلى إضعاف رجولة الرجال المسلمين
Shaykh Muhammad ibn Salih Al-Uthaymin
Shaykh Salih Al-Fawzan
الشيخ محمد بن صالح العثيمين
الشيخ صالح الفوزان
These are the people that deserve to be refuted. And the refutation is strong, not a reach.
may Allah guide them.
You are supposed make dua for their guidance first not curse a muslim for his destruction rightaway.
When did she said may the curse of Allah be upon Nouman ali khan ?@@Abunaza-as-seylani
You are right thought, may Allah guide him, and those who follow him.
@@aliyyabangura9558 aameen
جزاك الله خيرا
Much needed in these times
Many have been afflicted with femenism or red pill
I am a Muslim living in the West. I am not going to criticize anyone, but I will tell you the family system in Muslim community here is broken and the majority of all marriages are now ending in divorce. The core reason is wives challenging the authority and decisions of their husband. This fitnah has also spread in the Islamic world through social media. Sorry if my opinion offends anyone, but it is the truth. Divorce was unheard of in my parents generation. Nowadays it is the opposite.
People need to stop looking up to western people as though they are a symbol of ethics and morals. Most people who come here will be polluted spiritually.
You are right. I know a few men who married a muslimah in the west and the wives had dissenting attitude towards them and they ended up in divorce and the government split the man's livelihood into half. This is oppression of highest level.
Truth, my father is gentle and loving but he doesn't leave a door open for my mother to command him in any manner. They are happily married, he even Married a second wife and is on good terms with her as well. May Allah bless you with a good marriage.
"Whose the amir of the house is a seperate discussion" lol. So it can be decided between husband and wife the wife leads. Maybe in your household Nouman
I don’t think he was being literal in that sense. Maybe I’m seeing his response in a different way than everyone else here.
@@ruhelmiah203I think you do see it differently than supposed to, no hate to you, may Allah guide you to the truth.
Akhi make a refutation on him about music
Please
Its pretty simple akhi, his evidence is very poor and desperate, same as Muhammad Hijāb.
He says scholars dont have ijmā on the prohibition of music. He quotes ibn hazm and the scholars of ash'ariyyah and ahnāf.
He has deceived himself and his fans into forgetting this one usūl in fiqh:
"Scholars are in need of evidence, they themselves are not evidence."
So someone can't go "Imam Abū Hanīfā (رحمه الله) said matter is this way and that's it" while there is a verse or hadith refuting said matter.
As later scholars have explained, that some of previous scholars have made mistakes regarding lots of fiqh issue. Due to their inability to travel or a certain hadith not reaching them etc, we dont judge their intentions, BUT our job is to follow Qur'ān and Sunnah based upon the Salaf's understanding.
Shaykh Salih Āl ash Shaykh (حفظه الله) has even said that ibn Hazm al Andalūsī (رحمه الله) isn't even Sunni and that his madhab is particularly for himself.
This is why we follow scholars in Haqq and reject their mistakes.
Qur'ān and Sunnah according to how the salaf understood it, above everyone.
There are COUNTLESS ahādith prohibiting music, so it won't matter if a few scholars say it's halāl bc the news may have not reached them...
Those who perposfully deny ahādith, they're either juhhāl or jahmi/mu'tazali kuffār. BarakAllah feek
Why? The issue on music is clear. Why would you allow someone like him to cause doubts? Don't listen to such people.
@@rohail-saqib Bro he's lying against Imam Abu Haneefah r.a. The Hanafi madhab is the STRCTEST against music out of the 4 madhabs. Imam Abu Haneefah used to hate even singing, let alone music.
"The madhhab of Abu Hanifah is the strictest in this regard, and his comments are among the harshest. His companions clearly stated that it is haram to listen to all musical instruments such as the flute and the drum, even tapping a stick. They stated that it is a sin which implies that a person is a fasiq (rebellious evil doer) whose testimony should be rejected. They went further than that and said that listening to music is fisq (rebellion, evildoing) and enjoying it is kufr (disbelief). These are their words. They narrated in support of that a hadith which could not be attributed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). They said: he should try not to hear it if he passes by it or it is in his vicinity. Abu Yusuf said, concerning a house from which could be heard the sound of musical instruments: Go in without their permission, because forbidding evil actions is obligatory, and if it were not allowed to enter without permission, people could not have fulfilled the obligatory duty (of enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil).
and
Al Qurtubi reports that Abu al-Tayyib al-Tabari said:
"Abu Hanifa, he used to hate singing and considered it among the sinful acts. Same as Sufyan, Hammad, Ibrahim, Shabi and others.”
Sources: Ighathat al-Lahfan 1/425 and Tafsir Al Qurtubi 14/55
@@rohail-saqib And yes, Ibn Hazm had Jahmi aqeedah in asmaa was-sifaat (blud legit rejected even the word sifaat) and he weakened the hadith in sahih al Bukhari about music (people excuse him with not having had access to the full isnaad of the hadith, but he should know better that the Muslims have ijmaa on the authenticity of Sahih al Bukhari).
@@spartanbeast3575Ibn Hazm is one of the Imams of the Muslims, careful how we address the scholars and their mistakes. Don’t just throw that around as laymen may misunderstand and do not use the word “blud” with scholars.
Akhi just as a heads up, I've heard he reports/flags videos that use his video/audio. That's why others reference him and link the source video, but don't include it.
How would someone be responsible for something without having authority?! Imagine your boss puts in charge, responsible, of some team without giving you any authority over them. Imagine trying to lead you
He'll soon claim copyright of this clip
Ma shaa Allah may Allah reward you with good! ❤
As salaam u'alaikum akhi. He will probably strike your video. You may want to cover his image and also distort the sound a bit to protect yourself
Has he been known to do this before? What a coward!
I know that he did something of complaining to kuffar about a muslim brother regarding a you tube video of his@@CGJUGO80
I don’t listen to NAK nor support him, but what he said resembled what shaykh Fawzan said. Which is that we are responsible for them. Responsibility entails authority but he said he was talking about that word specifically and not authority and that he will get to authority and that he and we do have authority.
He is trying to deny the aspect of authority of men upon women mentioned by Allah in this verse, if you read the entire ayah, you will understand the exact meaning of the verse and i dint think any muslim man denies the responsibility of his to provide and protect the womenfolk.
Allah says
“ Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allâh has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allâh and to their husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allâh orders them to guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property). As to those women on whose part you see ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allâh is Ever Most High, Most Great.”
Men are 'Qawwamun'. They should call towards good and woman should obey them in good.
Jaahil Ahmaq innovator.
May Allah bless you for exposing this falsehood
The self proclaimed Qur'an expert Norman ali kan keeps on giving bs
This man should give up speaking.
His blunders are endless as he interprets quran based upon opinion and logic and to this day hasn’t spoken about where he studied or who he took knowledge from or what is principles are in explaining quran, he rejects Sahih hadirh, belittles scholars and mocks the salafi dawah and attacks those who guide towards rectifying aqeedah.
His shaykh is a sufi who himself whenever speaks about rasool speaks fabrication
To be fair he never said men have no authority, hes saying that this verse specifically cant be used for proving that since it talks about responsibility. Of course you can put up an argument with this but the point is that he never advocated for men to be weak or said that they dont have authority.
In islam we take quran as a whole. We do not interpret quran on a verse by verse basis.
What NAK is trying to do is, using this one verse to interpret all our dealings with our women.
As you said, he did acknowledge Allah saying we have authority over them, but he intentionally does not use that verse to interpret our dealings with women.
Instead he uses this verse and carve out a different narrative.
So, the correct Interpretation of the verse is, we have authority over them so we are responsible for them.
If we are just responsible for their day to day dealings, then it becomes a servant master relationship. Which is not what Allah meant in this verse. But NAK made it out to be that way.
In other words he changed the script upside down. He used quran to directly oppose Allah.
Good video and nice refutation. But be careful. He is very powerful man with lot of weird connections in government.
UA-cam allows criticism of everyone but him. He can take down your video or even your channel.
Money and wealth, sometimes results in power and connections.
❤
He ain’t a scholar obviously. 😂
It was clearly the tafseer of one single verse which was talking about men being Qawwam and according to the use of the word 'Qawwam' in other places in the Qur'an, it can be established that this specific ayah talks about men's "responsibility" over women. He actually never denied the authority part, and wanted to for the time being to only focus on the ayah that he was explaining. That is explained by the phrase "a separate discussion" - referring that the authority of men over the family is indeed a discussion elsewhere in the Quran. He is even confirming Sheikh Uthaymeen's words; providing protection financially, physically and in every other way is man's RESPONSIBILTY which he will be questioned about. As a response the family has to obey him, wife and children alike, which then puts the man in a position of authority such that he can make decisions for them etc. (the topic which Ustaz Nouman never denied or rejected rather confirmed it) .
The issue here is, even though he acknowledge the authority part, he used the "responsible " verse to interpret all our dealings with women.
Do you get it? When talking about our dealings with women, we must acknowledge both authority and responsibilities.
But, he for many years bring up responsibilities of men, and interpret our dealings with women on that basis alone.
That's is not allowed in islam. Responsibilities without authority is slavery. Responsibilities with authority is the correct Interpretation of this verse as Allah commanded the women to obey us, in the same verse itself.
Do you get it? It is very slight, almost like a magic, how he does it. But, if you have an eye for it, you can catch it.
He essentially is directly opposing Allah, using Allah's own words. Now thats talent. Its deviant obviously, but he has talent.
Well after remembering his picture scandal I can say of course he has no authority. People like him have no authority and women do not respect them.
The stupid 80% “educated” womenfolk of Pakistan listen to him.
Don't speak about the private lives of people.
“The whole of a Muslim is inviolable for another Muslim: his blood, his property, and his honour.” Part taken from Hadith 35, 40 hadith an nawawi
Astaghfirullah!!! Bro this is not constructive criticism this is straight up gheebah. You said something about a brother which he would not like to be told behind in his absence.
Assalam o alaikum
With regards to this i think that an effort should be made to apprach nouman Ali Khan directly instead of making videos about him. Or see and do investigation with regards to him. But i think that the brother who made the video has done well to correct him.All of us make mistakes but to guide each other to the truth is what we must do as is said in surah al Asr
إِلَّا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ وَعَمِلُواْ ٱلصَّٰلِحَٰتِ وَتَوَاصَوۡاْ بِٱلۡحَقِّ وَتَوَاصَوۡاْ بِٱلصَّبۡرِ ٣
" except for those who believe, do good deeds, urge one another to the truth, and urge one another to steadfastness "
But with regards to those who are discrediting him he has done a lot of good work upon the quran and spreading its message to other and to people who never truly knew they were muslims and they believe in islam because their parents did so as well and he has given them evidence as to why the quran is not replicable by any human or jinn or any other creation of Allah. So instead of talking bad about him give him advice in the best way and correct him not just because he is doing something wrong but also because you do truly love your fellow muslim and want to truly see him with you and all of us in the highest levels of Jannah insha'Allah. Otherwise if you wish to make comments about him and say this and that about him. Thats up to you.
If he does anything public it should be made public
Salafis, relax. wasting all your ammo on disunity
Disunity? The Muslims cannot unite on anything other than Tawhid, La Ila ha il Allah.
Relax, you’re wasting your energy by accusing people unjustly.
Why is the salaf so much more important did they also get wahy no!
they literally did. What the prophet sallallahu alayhi was wa sallam spoke was revelation.
No, they did not get Revelation. The Prophet ﷺ did. And he said they are the best of our Ummah. So that’s it. No space for opinions.
Making up his own shaytani tafseer
He's wrong about certain topics but personally I've benefitted a lot from his other talks. I think you should reconsider the harshness of your speech if you don't have proof that he is an agent.
@@sugoi9680you're keeping you're "ra's El mal" head of money we call it in Arabic, in the hands of an unstable person.
And with that I mean your religion. take it from where you fear no doubt, better to find yourself have become a sufi graveworshipper or a shi'i and enter hell never to get out of it.
You will be surprised how convincing some sufi scholars are, I am not new to Islam and study it and still fear their hidden falsehood. May Allah guide you.