I Treated myself to something EXTRAVAGANT - Sony GDM FW900
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 тра 2024
- Thanks to Lenovo and AMD for sponsoring a portion of the video! Visit www.bestbuy.com/site/promo/le... to learn more.
The Sony GDM FW-900 is one of the greatest monitors ever made with its widescreen aspect ratio and an incredibly high rated resolution (for the time) this 20-year-old retro beast puts many modern gaming displays to shame! What makes this thing so special, and why did Linus spend so much money on it?
Discuss on the forum: linustechtips.com/topic/14292...
Buy an ASUS ROG SWIFT 360Hz PG259QN: geni.us/JR4O
Buy an Alienware AW3423DW QD-OLED: geni.us/Lfvztv8
Purchases made through some store links may provide some compensation to Linus Media Group.
► GET MERCH: lttstore.com
► AFFILIATES, SPONSORS & REFERRALS: lmg.gg/sponsors
► PODCAST GEAR: lmg.gg/podcastgear
► SUPPORT US ON FLOATPLANE: www.floatplane.com/
FOLLOW US
---------------------------------------------------
Twitter: / linustech
Facebook: / linustech
Instagram: / linustech
TikTok: / linustech
Twitch: / linustech
MUSIC CREDIT
---------------------------------------------------
Intro: Laszlo - Supernova
Video Link: • [Electro] - Laszlo - S...
iTunes Download Link: itunes.apple.com/us/album/sup...
Artist Link: / laszlomusic
Outro: Approaching Nirvana - Sugar High
Video Link: • Sugar High - Approachi...
Listen on Spotify: spoti.fi/UxWkUw
Artist Link: / approachingnirvana
Intro animation by MBarek Abdelwassaa / mbarek_abdel
Monitor And Keyboard by vadimmihalkevich / CC BY 4.0 geni.us/PgGWp
Mechanical RGB Keyboard by BigBrotherECE / CC BY 4.0 geni.us/mj6pHk4
Mouse Gamer free Model By Oscar Creativo / CC BY 4.0 geni.us/Ps3XfE
CHAPTERS
---------------------------------------------------
0:00 Intro
0:58 What is a CRT?
2:53 Why this CRT?
3:32 LCD vs CRT
4:20 Flicker Warning
4:43 LCD vs CRT Cont.
8:45 QD-OLED vs CRT
10:55 Rolling around at the speed of sound
12:15 Resolution on CRTs
14:30 Trinitron
16:35 Why not to buy - Наука та технологія
Linus explaining to the audience what a CRT is makes me feel really old.
Same
Hell I'm far from old and it makes me feel old.
Literally 90+% of the population requires an explanation on CRT technology. Likely you and everyone else who 'knew' what a CRT was just had seen/used one before and maybe knew the acronym.
i feel you
Well, you've got the name to fit that
I think CRTs are a big part of the reason that we remember old games looking better than when we replay them on our LCD/LED monitors.
It's a factor. The bigger factor is still nostalgia, but CRT tech is definitely a part of that picture.
Yeah I grew up with SNES/N64/PS1 and in the 2000's when it became common to play those systems on emulators I hated the hideous flat pixelated look (PS1 games look like pixel vomit on an LCD). I stayed away from playing old games because of that. Then I saw a post of a gaming setup with a CRT monitor few years back and loved the aesthetic. So I bought one, pulled out all my old systems from my closet and they look absolutely stunning on a CRT. Nostalgia has nothing to do with it. It's how the games were built to be played. I went from RF modulator trash in the '90s to god tier RGB in the '20s.
@@awill891 I'm 41 years old and have been playing games since I was 6. I lived through the CRT era and still have a CRT at home that I sometimes use for retro gaming when I feel like it. Also fine with using LCDs, with various settings. I do mod hacking on old NES games. I play old N64, Dreamcast, Gamecube, PS1 stuff, etc. C64, Amiga, and Atari 2600 too when the whim occurs once every several years or so.
I have a lot of younger gamer friends, and very few of them can stomach my favorite games from the NES era. Nostalgia has a ton to do with it. CRT is certainly how they were played and how they were built, but the concept of "how the games were meant to be played" is just fanboi nonsense. It's how you prefer it to look. And that's fine. Just don't pretend authorial intent is an objective metric.
@@blarghblargh "fanboi nonsense" god you're so embarrassing to get this upset and call names. I have an OLED and LCD for modern stuff and CRT for old analog stuff. Have no clue why you're so butthurt. It's a fact pre-HD games look better on a CRT. Unless all the devs in 1991 were developing 240p games for a 4K OLED screen and I didn't know about it.
@@blarghblargh I think CRTs looking much better than LCDs with lower resolution content like retro games isn't really a matter of preference, unless you somehow love excessive blur and artifacting. It's probably more a case of it just happened to work out this way, rather than any sort of "how it was meant to be played" but still.
My heart skipped a beat when Linus skewed the electron beam with that magnetic bit... I'm old enough to remember when you used to need a TV repairman to use a "degaussing coil" after something magnetic was brought too close to the screen (it would leave the mask magneti,ed in small areas, skewing color "ghosts" on the picture like a rainbow burn-in).
When color CRT monitors became popular, they began fitting a degaussing coil inside the frame of the display face that sent a degaussing burst every time it was turned on. That's why bigger monitors always made that weird "whomp" sound on powerup as the capacitor discharged that degaussing burst through the coil.
You could trigger them manually which was always satisfying to do. They had the added benefit of getting rid of static build up too which was also another problem with CRT's.
Now that's something I didn't know! Always wondered how it worked, all I knew was that the loud noise was to fix magnetized stuff. Thanks :)
I like the de gaussing whomp xD
My old CRT screen hat the function as well but I just needed it once. I had a set of magnets (building speakers) to close to it and my whole desktop was wonky xD
Lol also the reason you gotta discharge for 3 days so you don't get shocked to death working on them. Super super dangerous stuff
Actually that's because they have a big old flyback transformer inside them that boosts the voltage to some many thousands of volts so that it can blast electrons at the screen - the capacitive effects on those things are super crazy. Not entirely true you need to discharge them for several days either - they typically have a rubber "anode cap" inside them, and if you poke under the skirt with a good quality screwdriver, a ground cable, and a very steady hand you can discharge it. I would strongly not advise anybody in general population to try though, just to make sure. That's aside the fact that relatively modern CRTs have a bleeder resistor in there and they discharge fairly quickly after turning them off, but it's best not to assume that is the case.
The reason why the mask gets magnetised is because the electrons that are accelerated from said electron gun are moving really really fast, have charge, and don't always hit their intended target, thus leaving a charge on the mask and causing the colours to trip out. Not directly related to the whole thing where the CRT stores a lot of energy - the amount of charge stored on the mask is actually kinda tiny - that's just the transformer inside the thing being heavy and metallic and dealing with big voltages
Honestly I am always fascinated by how good the best of old technology is. The same goes for digital cameras vs. analog cameras. The reason why we can have old movies in 4K and 8K is just because the analog film it was shot on has so much more data in it than digital cameras. I remember the first digital camera we had... You can't even see the faces in the photos clearly.
Film quality depends on which level of physical quality filmtape the movie was transfered onto. There are HD-releases of old movies out there which looks absolutely clean and only part of that is the digital processing in remastering, but there are also HD-releases in which you can see the film grain meaning the original filmtape wasn't that fine quality. So it depends on the source material if rescanning it in 4K or 8K actually makes sense.
Though overall I absolutely know what you meant in your comment and I'm also amazed how good very old movies can look once scanned in HD.
Old digital cameras with a CCD image sensor instead of a CMOS sensor can take better looking photos. Those old cameras were *expensive* and part of that expense was the big, glass lens. When you zoom in on a CCD image you see *pixels*. Zoom in on a CMOS image and you see *blurry fuzz*. CCD is "sharp all the way down".
CMOS works around its built in fuzz by going to extreme resolutions. Like a Class D audio amp, the fuzz is buried in the signal.
YES! thank you someone gets it!
There are 3 kinds of camera, Digital, Analog and Film. The ones we used in the 90s to take photos were color film cameras, they were not analog. The only analog cameras that ever existed were old analog TV broadcast cameras that were based on the iconoscope an analog device which is basically the reverse-CRT in many ways kinda like how a microphone is a reverse-speaker the iconoscope is the reverse-crt. Iconoscope cameras were THE ONLY analog cameras and basically they were not available for ordinary people to buy. We had film cameras instead.
@@greggv8 Really depends... The major disadvantage of CMOS is rolling shutter and also the fact it's usually slower than CCDs. CCDs are way faster and if I'm not mistaken they are parallel meaning that they don't have the rolling shutter which is usually responsible for image distortions. I read somewhere that CMOS is basically cheaper so it's more widely used.
Can't wait for thousands of delusional Facebook marketplace sellers to list their low-end CRT monitors for $3000 firm 💀
Rock solid 24 fps gaming at a razor sharp 640x480
“NO LOWBALLS! I know what I have.”
2000hr tube for 200 dollar thinking they selling it as a deal
True but you already have an FW. I got burned hard by DF's video while I was searching for one :)
Not to mention that the average CRT monitor can't compare to a modern LCD for clarity/sharpness - if you're doing anything other than gaming on one, get ready for hard to read, shimmery text!
Linus: "remember those glow in the dark stars you had on your celling as a kid?"
me, a 22 year old homeowner: "you mean the ones i put in my bedroom very recently...yes"
did you mean to say 32 year old home owner?
You’re not a real adult until you have glow in the dark stars and a sweet, twin-xl, car bed. Source - self-proclaimed adult
@@zuki9537
Any first world nation excluding second rate places like america. You could trip over and be in debt your whole life and thank yourself lucky some scum shot you at a school or fast food place for no reason so you didn't have to work 5 jobs with no leave to pay for a wooden house that could burn down at any point 🤣.
@@lifeofentropy 31 here, and i just had to give up on owning a home because I can barely afford rent in my work area... maybe someday when i finally pay off all my debt, assuming that im not forced to pay for healthcare, new car, car repairs, traffic tickets, or any other surprises...
@@lifeofentropy nope. 22. i got the house as inheritance.
it would be kinda cool to see CRTs come back with more modern technology to help them have better resolution and stuff.
Can't help but agree it would be cool, in the mean time I might get a cheaper old CRT just as a fun option for my modern system
Unfortunately it won't ever happen. CRTs are made out of very hazardous meterials.
they will
@@sologamerreborn6677 so are lightbulbs
@@lopiklop not quite the same. Crts are made with several pounds of lead and murcury. Plus most light bulbs are also LED now.
Crts will never be manufactured again just based on the manufacturing process alone.
Congrats on owning an FW900! I'm glad to see this monitor being spoken about even after 20 years of it being made!
I have owned an FW900 for several years now and use it as my main monitor for my set up everyday since.
After watching your video, there are a few things I wanted to mention in regards to the resolutions and display connections.
You are correct that the Titan X is the last Nvidia card that can run a native DVI-I output to complement the FW900's VGA and RGBHV via BNC analog inputs, however you can also use various DAC adapters such as HDMI to VGA, DP to VGA, and even USB-C to VGA. This is very helpful for people like myself who have an FW900 and have a modern day GPU such as a RTX 3070 or 3080.
It is important to note that the majority of DACs available will limit the display output to 1920x1080 @ 60 hz. However, depending on which DAC adapter you use, you can output a resolution of up to 2560x1600 @ 60 hz. Some will argue that this is not recommended as it goes above the user manual's list of supported resolutions, as it can put more strain and wear on the monitor overtime.
It is possible that some DP to VGA adapters can display a 2560x1600 @ 60 hz resolution because certain DP to VGA adapters have a higher pixel clock speed than others.
To run a 2560x1600 @ 60 hz resolution, you would need a DP to VGA adapter than has a pixel clock speed of at least 350 Mhz.
Here is a small list of DP to VGA adapters that I can confirm that will allow you to go past the 1920x1080 @ 60 hz limitation (350 Mhz clock speed or higher):
Startech DP2VGAHD20
IcyBox IB-SPL1031 (requires USB to be powered)
Delock Adapter DisplayPort 1.2 male > VGA female black (No. 62967)
I can also confirm that the three listed DP to VGA adapters will allow for a 2304 x 1440 @ 80 hz resolution with no issues.
It goes without saying that the people at the Hard Forum have well documented these findings and can be found here:
hardforum.com/threads/24-widescreen-crt-fw900-from-ebay-arrived-comments.952788/page-381
Otherwise, amazing video! Hope to see more of your FW900 in the near future!
The 1080p/60 limitation was stated in the video.
@@daltonrandall4348 really? I didn't even watch it.
@@dhammalama
Phenodreum ≠ Phatnightmares
@@daltonrandall4348 Right. I’m adding additional information that was not discussed in this video.
The real LPT is in the comments
It took me a long while to understand why everyone wanted antialiasing. I never used it in the CRT days because it always looked worse, but now it's basically mandatory.
I thought it was just a me thing and never realized it was the crt because I would never use it on a crt but like you said now it's basically mandatory and thought it was just a thing of the times. Wild.
Tbh there’s a lot of modern games that I think look worse with AA. Sometimes it makes faraway details impossible to make out
MSAA does not look worse on a CRT.
Edit: you guys REALLY need to learn about different AA types
The type of AA matters a lot, FXAA often just smudges the image, SM and MS, etc, are far better about it, since they down sample and/or use 3d data. Still yeah CRT you don't need it.
Native resolution goes a long way to not needing AA, especially with 4k. But it also depends on the type of AA, some are better than others.
11:20 Actually this is 480p. The Dreamcast supports VGA natively and outputs progressive-scan when plugged to a VGA monitor.
Very true
This is strange, Linus making such an obvious error. It also talk about scanlines, so it might be this monitor supports 480i and this is a special mode. It should be also interesting to see how it was hooked up
@@LucaMolteni84 its an easy mistake to make, as in the retro world most things DID NOT support 480p only 480i, by the time progressive scan was mainstream crt was on its way out...
Thanks for pointing this out.
100%
5:23 - One of the most useful tips I've heard on here. I hate it when my PC randomly opens things on the wrong monitor, especially when the 2nd screen is off. Win+Shift+arrowkey is the fix I was longing for!
What are you on about?...(presses Win+shift+right arrow) You Tube jumps over to 2nd display. OMG, where has this been my whole life.
As someone who plays games fullscreen and browses the web on the other display, this could be a game changer. Thank you, I didn't really get what was happening when Linus did it.
He's still missing ONE key component there: a VGA output for the Dreamcast. That doubles the vertical resolution, outputting VGA 640x480 or 480p instead of 480i. Those signals are all natively present inside the connection port there, as well as full SCART and composite etc.
(You can also do this with a Sony PS2, using the correct adapter cord, however it only outputs 640x480 IIRC, as the games were all made for that aspect ratio to match TVs back then.)
Actually the PS2 was capable of 1080 there even was a TV with one built into it where they hardwired it to 1080 res (like a built in Roku vs one you stick in the HDMI port)
As a teen I had a Dreamcast with vga box and a Mitsu 'trinitron' type display. It was SUCH an amazing experience. It made my PS2 look so crappy. But now almost all games work on emulators.
But not all Dreamcast games support the VGA adapter. :( It's not that they *couldn't*, the companies that made them mostly neglected to enable that when they were written. IIRC most of those games have been patched to enable 480p, but of course they'll only play on an emulator, cut down to be crammed onto a 700 meg CD-R (which won't play on the final Dreamcast revision), or a Dreamcast with a modded BIOS and a hard drive or SDCard or USB mod.
@@greggv8 A lot of the games that wont allow you to boot with the vga output will if you just launch the game first then plug the cable in after
@@animeloveer97 It doesn't seem to make much difference overall though. I have a modded PS2 with Component out, HD resolutions can be chosen(and from memory even forced for some games that didn't originally support it), and I was struggling to determine which output was best(on an LCD TV). From memory I think some things looked slightly better & others slightly worse.
Okay, this might explain why in my head the games I played as a kid looked way better somehow, compared to when I replayed them on LCD later. The blur is mind blowing.
It is. CRT, in a way, is inherently flawed technology but games of that day were made with CRT's for CRT's and especially with RF or composite cables (or at best S-video) which also added a blur of their own. Old SNES and Genesis/MD games that have dithered and blocky/banding color gradients when watched with LCD actually look smooth on CRT, almost like the console is outputting more colors than it is truly capable of. The same effect are even used to create transparency effects which look real on CRT but wrong LCD. Like the shield or waterfalls in Sonic 1, they look wrong dithered mess in LCD where as with CRT it is a smooth and transparent.
100% this is why. I broke out my PS2 the other day and plugged it into a Sony Vega CRT, and it looked fantastic. Just like I remembered it. Modern displays are just absolute garbage when it comes to displaying sub-HD resolutions.
@@TheJRSvideos Well they can do okay with non HD sources of film content. But with anything digital, it's going to look like crap on a modern display if it was designed for and on a CRT as those drawbacks in a CRT heavily influenced how these games were made. Take away the CRT and you remove a massive part of the equation that led to the look those games had.
@@TheJRSvideos key word: sub-HD
I really loved this video, more than usual which I often watch Linus videos for fun and probably my favourite videos he ever does is talking about very old and very rare technology. Thing is he's kind of got a salesman vibe so while he is being very objective I think a lot of people are getting the wrong impression or misremembering. It might look "better" than a cheap display, but the games themselves looked bad, and the displays any middle class family would have looked bad. It had all kinds of different problems to them especially the brightness issue and some of the other stuff Linus talked about, so I feel like a high enough refresh monitor with the least motion blur would still look best if you could just get the scaling right. But then I also hated the graphics back then. Like Command and Conquer: Red Alert is just unplayable to me for so many reasons, and the visual quality is one of them. Adding blurring from CRT is like lipstick on a pig to graphical quality back then imo.
Put it this way, The Division blows me away to this day how good it looks, and doesn't need blurring or quirks of CRT to do so.
Retro Games were designed around CRT use, it's why they look better. LCD panels didn't come out for a long time after so they where not even in the thought
When I was in high school I had a teacher that had this exact monitor bought it themselves to use at school. One day they came in and it was gone replaced with a crappy Dell monitor. Apparently the school district had replaced all the computers and the IT guys took the monitor thinking it belonged to the school it took 2 days of complaining before they gave it back.
I wonder if the IT guy knew what it was.
@@computeraidedworld1148 probably
@@ChronicBongitis420 probably knew it was a crt but doubt they'd know this specific one.
I always wondered how many PVMs (professional video monitor) were thrown into dumpsters, when security systems or whatever were upgraded. I remember in movies you saw walls of these monitors.
They're expensive for their size and considering their age. But i always wanted one just for retro gaming.
I don't think the IT guys did it on accedent.
When I was a young adult, one of the first things I bought with my hard earned money was a Sony Trinitron CRT TV. It weighed 90lbs, it was a behemoth…. And I’ve never enjoyed an image on any screen so much since. It got left at my parents and sold at some point. I had no idea that image quality would still be playing catch-up this far into the future! I miss that thing. Lights off, Doom 3 running through my 5.1 sound setup…. It was magical
I was curious about CRT's ever since I was old enough to understand how electronics worked. When I discovered an animated explanation of the CRT working, it totally blew my mind.. I just wondered how the hell humans developed something that could pull off such an amazing feat.
Interestingly, as I hear Linus 'grew up on a farm' (so is a 'farmer' himself?) the CRT was invented by a farmer 2! A man of course (as they invent everything, pretty much =) & came up with the 'beam bending' thing 2 break up pictures into 'scan lines & bladee bla. The color version was a refinement by Zenith I think = just threw at the engineer guys saying 'make a color version of this' & figured it out by breaking it into 'color phosphor groups' & so on. Trinitron was a deal 2 reduce 'shadow mask brightness loss' by using wires instead of a solid sheet with a bunch of holes. Problems with Trinitron include the ALWAYS annoying horizontal 'stabilization wire(s) & if they R around a lot of bass they can also get 'rainbow wave' type artifacts, which U can also C sometimes if U bang on them, depending on size. The brightest CRT I've ever seen was a fairly small random computer monitor but I forget the name. It was like 12" or something = not big @ all just 'WoW that's really BRIGHT!' =)
Interestingly the Pioneer 'Kuro' a bunch of 'fanbody' rave about being so 'movie like' becasue 'dark blacks' (for a plasma, which all suk 4 'black level but so what?) is just like many of their other plasmas but they put 'sunglasses' in front of it, like make the 'shaded layer' even DARKER (because 'have 2' have 'something' otherwise the GRAY background is even LESS dark than a CRT?) N E 1 who pretends 2 think that CRT has better 'black levels' than LCD or ANYTHING ELSE is #FullRetard tier insane = like Linus there in the $tudio looking directly at the different things & how 'light gray' the 'blacks' R on the CRTs & spewing the same 'mantra' nonsense 'CRTs have the best black levels' = WTF? =)) It's like all the fools at 'so-called colleges' pretending 2 think boys can B girls if they just chop their dix off HAHAHA
@@Deathrape2001 Aside from all the hateful drivel, "the CRT was invented by a farmer" is plainly misleading. He grew up on a farm, but that had nothing to do with his discoveries. Upon graduating high school he was in the military a few months before quitting to go to university. The professions of him & all the others that worked on it were physicists & associated fields.
@@DoubleMonoLR HAHA not only was he a farmer, but his name was 'Farmsworth' = LOL =)) U R just trollin' =P
У меня сдох 22 дюймовый NEC MultiSync FE2111SB 😢😢😢😢 Твм сначала контакт пропадал, стукнеш и заработает, я все платы лупой просмотрел и кое где пропаял и бесполезно. А сегодня вообще перестал стартавать, мигает индикатор (светодиод)😢😢😢
А моник то топчик, один из последних по качеству, кинескоп Diamondtron, это крутой конкурент Тринитрона
So a big correction: The Trinitron didn't use slits, it used vertical wires. Those two faint lines at 1/3rd and 2/3rds of the way up are horizontal stabilizers. If you give a light bop to the side of the display you'll actually see the image shimmer and wobble as all the wires bounce around a bit.
Also another fun trick that old CRT-designed games used was free transparency. They would render textures that were in various grid or line patterns and take advantage of the natural blur that would be introduced to get free transparent clouds or translucent texture effects.
The natural blur thing and the vampire example Linus gave is not a feature of CRTs but of the old composite video signal (that yellow cable that's usually paired with the red and white audio cables). That signal crammed all the analog brightness and color and timing data into one wire, which results in a lot of distortions like that. You won't get it on a CRT with more 'modern' inputs like S-video, component or RGB/VGA (in ascending order of quality). The two are often equated because especially in the states, all old TVs only had composite input (nowadays people 'RGB mod' their CRT TVs to get higher quality RGB input into the display)
Good info! 🙂
If someone want to sell that widescreen CRT Sony GDM-FW900, I'm interested as long as it can be shipped to Montreal from British Columbia or Alberta, Saskatchewan or Manitoba; I can drive to pick it up in Ontario, or Nova Scotia, in the bilingual Province of/du New/Nouveau Brunswick, Province du Québec, Territory of Labrador or Newfoundland.
That was only a thing if you used shitty composite video. RGB and S video removed that effect.
Okay, here's the thing. I kinda wish that someone would step in with a brand new no compromises CRT for historical purposes, like for museums. Because a lot of historical footage is completely unwatchable on modern displays because of the upscaling artifacts.
if anyone were to manufacture tubes again they would be as expensive (if not significantly more, economy of scale) as they used to be and nobody would buy them. I got a new old stock 32" trinitron for 500 bucks (700 dollar tv in 06) and people in the crt gaming subreddit flipped out because im ruining the value of tubes
@@braydoncoate9583 if this video proves anything it is that if someone made it, certain people would happily pay through the nose for them as long as they are good quality.
It'd be a license to print money for a company willing to bite that bullet of tooling up a factory to make them and then sell them at a 2000% markup coz where else are people gonna go to buy them?
@@tyrannicpuppy a bunch of teenagers claiming they would buy one is different from actual enthusiasts who have the cash to pony up 5-6k for a new crt
@@tyrannicpuppy 2000% markup would be a 10,000 dollar monitor. Tubes are so fucking stupidly complex and expensive to manufacturer
@@braydoncoate9583 yeah. I'm assuming while there's documentation lingering in company offices and warehouses, most of it is likely to be proprietary, and all the people who designed the methods for manufacturing these puppies are retired or passed away. Hell, all the plants that made these surely scrapped or reused any tools they would have used, so a new manufacture would likely have to setup a plant from scratch. So the only way for a crt to make a come back would be if some insane billionaire did it as a pet project...
The CRT I had 20 years ago was so heavy, it bent my desk to U shape.
I still have the desk and its still bent.
Weight was my biggest issue with CRT monitors. If they made them as light as modern LED, I would have stuck with CRT.
Virtually impossible to do so. You need to create a massive glass tube that's strong enough to contain a vacuum. The bigger the screen, the bigger the tube and also the thicker the glass needs to be.
@@paulbrookfield4133
Plasma TV's.
@@juanme555 more like LPD (Laser-powered Phosphor Display)
@@juanme555 I still use my Panasonic Plasma tv from 2010 as a daily driver.
FED/SED displays were a continuation of CRT technology using a matrix of tiny cathode ray tubes, they were slimmer, lighter, required less power and were ready to be launched on the market, but were abandoned after LCDs became dominant...
Was REEEEALLLY hoping my pop's Erik's comment was still on here....
It is on my screen.
Looking for it as well
I can't even put into words how different this video was from your usual content, but damn was I glued to my screen for this. Study this, and make many more videos like it.
Ship it to the new LTT Labs facility for use in retro console content.
@@mndlessdrwer I like that Idea, the more I get to see the FW900 the better tbh.
Linus: “why do they not still make these?”
Also Linus: “so let’s talk about this hazardous e-waste problem”
Me: Leaded glass
Apart from a microwave, servicing a crt is my worst nightmare. ( though hugely more rewarding )
@@benwu7980 obligatory CRTs contain 20,000+ volts inside when running and if A) not working properly or B) pre- 80s will store that voltage in the tube for days even after unplugged. I have experience repairing these, but please don't approach CRT repair if you don't know very well what you are doing and have training SPECIFICALLY for CRTs. But yes it is very rewarding if you can do it safely
"e-waste" but let us not mention how much less longer LCDs and the like last compared to many CRTs being able to last half a century with minimal loses if taken care of.
When CRTs were still being manufactured, the leaded glass from old sets was melted down and re-used in new sets. It didn't actually become an issue until we stopped manufacturing CRTs.
One thing to note is that crt can often be heavily enhanced by getting it properly calibrated (well all monitors/tv's can, but crt usually has a LOT more settings to go through and can be trickier to get the geometry just right), the service menus have a ton of additional settings (and the service manuals still exist online for a lot of monitors/tv's from the mid 90's and on), but just going through the general menu settings and adjusting them properly can mean a lot.
Analog cabling also relies a lot on quality of cabling, far more than digital cables. Nice heavy gauge wires and heavy shielding (with a good dielectric) can mean a lot, and you can find nice rgbhv or vga/dvi to rgbhv breakout cables used for a lot cheaper than you would have back when the monitors were made since they aren't exactly in demand.
Using a de-gaussing ring can also help bring some new life back into a crt (just make sure to use it with the monitor/tv turned off).
It's also easier to get to the internal components of a crt to service them, and with them being so much older power supplies (among other parts potentially) will sometimes need to have components updated.
Removing anti-glare coating (which only exists on certain crt's) also greatly benefits the picture quality (brightness especially) at the cost of... well making it more susceptible to glare. I did this on my XBR960 and it was a huge improvement.
It's crazy how ahead of its time CRTs were. Sadly the price and the size of them just were not feasible I guess.
They were not ahead... Flat panels just are behind.
@@TheAdatto so they were ahead of there time compared to most other options of tech
They were a product of their time and a tech that was researched for something like over 80 years.
the downside of them is they are very hazardous to make and if they break they can actually kill you in multiple ways
У меня сдох 22 дюймовый NEC MultiSync FE2111SB 😢😢😢😢 Твм сначала контакт пропадал, стукнеш и заработает, я все платы лупой просмотрел и кое где пропаял и бесполезно. А сегодня вообще перестал стартавать, мигает индикатор (светодиод)😢😢😢
А моник то топчик, один из последних по качеству, кинескоп Diamondtron, это крутой конкурент Тринитрона
When I was a young teen, my dad decided we would tackle our basement finishing all by ourselves so he could take the savings and buy the latest, greatest, 32" Trinitron, like around 1989 or so. It was a BEHEMOTH of a TV. I think it stayed down there (we turned the main basement space into like a giant den with surround sound and everything) until only a couple of years ago when he finally let it go on a random, big-appliance trash day.
Playing SNES and then N64 on that thing was BOMB ASS. Man, me and my brother didn't know how lucky we were.
Did yall throw it away? 🥲
BRO your dad is awesome :DDD
@@Roshan_420 I think so. It's kind of a shame, but you never really know what's going to become valuable later on, and it's not worth hoarding every single piece of tech. It was basically an old TV and my dad so no value in it anymore. Not to mention, that thing weighed a TON. So glad I'll never have to move CRTs ever again, personally.
@@testbenchdude personally i would have sold it locally or something to make someone else happy
@@Roshan_420 Alas, my dad is not you. Who knows though, maybe whoever picked it up made a good score.
RIP my chances of getting one now T_T
Glad to see more coverage of it regardless. It’s the holy grail!
you couldn't find it anyway, even before.
Tv's are your best bet I could get a stunning looking beovision 3 from bang & olufsen for free here in The Netherlands
same :/ kinda sad
What needs to happen is a colab on display lag with Bob RetroRGB.
Don't give up. The universe will reward you with this monitor one day, somehow.
I was born in the 90s, so my childhood was surrounded with CRT screens. Just dawned on me that one thing a child today will never hear is the parent coming into the room when the screen is black with a little white dot in the middle to say oh, looks like the tube is blownI remember when my last television had the tube blown and then we got upgraded to a flat screen and it was amazing. I was fascinated by it and the thing is it wasn’t even that flat
You could probably make a DP to VGA with FreeSync using a $1000 FPGA, that supports 240hz etc, most GPUs only came with slowish VGA converters (400MHz) which sets some hard limits on your output. My first monitor was a 1600x1200 CRT and it definitely pushed my X800 XL hard :P
11:34 Out of the 2 decades of my life I've been playing this game, I did not know you could run up that bridge. Linus is pro.
Pronus
kk. glad it wasnt just me
Noticed the same XD it's a bug tho since there is an invisible wall and you fall down to where he jumped.
Can't be much of a pro if he called the vga output on the Dreamcast 480i :p
Hey yorue the Sonic CD guy lol
My back still remembers CRT displays. Moving entire CAD teams to new offices. 21" or 24" CRT monitors with full metal shielding. They were both really heavy and so massive that you couldn't really carry them safely unless there were two of you, which hardly ever happened.
NEC 6FGe's for CAD. They were HEAVY. We gave two monitors per CAD user and Windows 95/98. They were hooge and needed re-enforced desks to cope with.
Mustve meen some pricey tubes! I have a 21 inch compaq qvision and i threw my back out bringing it up 3 flights
When my father worked for Sun they had a special trolley for moving the monitors around when they'd do installation and repair as they were not only very heavy, but also very fragile and expensive. Of course he also had to lug the servers around too...
i'm not allowed to pick up my 22": p1220
I did the same when I helped my highschool move their gear.
There’s a company in the US, that still appears to make CRTs, but I think it’s for oscilloscopes and stuff. But it would be cool if you could do a tour of their facility.
I always thought some company out there would start producing high end/professional CRTs for retro/pro/niche users.
The price would have be crazy high because the supply chain and manufacturing would need to be started from almost scratch, for an extremely niche market.
I wouldn't mind paying $5750 Canadian dollars (5,000 + 15% tax), that's 3500 $usd$ for a new 24" 16:9 CRT that would do 1080p at 120-150hz.
Sobering information: There haven't been new CRTs made in nearly two decades, even the runoff Chinese cheapos that you could still find after the big players moved away from them entirely and sold their production equipment to the Chinese manufacturers didn't last more than a few years. They required specialized equipment to make the windings for the deflection yokes. That equipment was, as mentioned before, sold off to the Chinese market and eventually retired and probably scrapped by now. Even if you found some sitting in a warehouse in China somewhere, it's got decades of neglect on it, not to mention you'd still need to produce the actual vacuum tubes and while those are easier, there aren't any of those production facilities configured to produce them and likely wouldn't be interested in taking on whatever small scale orders someone would put in for them to produce a couple thousand tubes. If you wanted CRTs, you'd have to bulk order them. Many tens of thousands. Quantities that even on the enthusiast market wouldn't move fast enough to recoup the costs. Whatever CRTs are out there now are the last of them. They are never coming back. If you're a retro gamer, get them while you can until they get too tired to keep putting out a decent picture.
@@goblinphreak2132 No it is not, unfortunately. I mean back to CRT eras, at first it was for the elite costing nearly $10 000 of today value, and these models were not profitable, they were an investment for a growth in demand and cost reduction. It became profitable and accessible when produced in millions, and the factories were used and slightly modified for several models over the years, the profitability was made over time. Those factories face maintenance too, which is very expansive as you can imagine. Not a profitable operation today, at all.
If the industry stopped their production, it is because it was not profitable anymore, this is by far the biggest reason. The demand for these behemoth would not grow, at best stagnate, and their durability mean low demand overall.
@@goblinphreak2132 No it isn't. There used to be a CRT in every home and dozens to hundreds in every office. Even if 1 in 10 gamers wanted one, it still wouldn't be high enough volume for the manufacturing to be affordable.
My school still has 100 CRTs monitors in our computer lab, and 84 of them still work well
@@goblinphreak2132 Everything you said is wrong. The retro scene is not anywhere near as big as you think it is, the percentage of retro gamers who actually want CRTs is smaller than you think it is, the ease at which anybody (even the biggest corporations) could begin production of CRTs is not anything at all like you think it is. If anyone actually _did_ start making CRTs it would be at a massive loss. There is no profit in it. Not even in the fantasy land you live in.
@@goblinphreak2132 I just think they would be way more expensive than people want to pay for because the economies of scale will be really low. For example DJs love Technics turntables, I have a pair of SL1200-MKII that I own and they're great. Technics stopped production ages ago but finally decided to resume production and the new one is $5,000. I bought my two MK2's for $400 each brand new still in box in 2007. Everyone thinks if they make CRTs again it will be $200 - $300 for a good one like it was in the late 90s but they'd likely have to cost like 10x that minimum which few people would pay for.
I sold two rather high end (I was an aspiring cs pro) 19" monitors to a researcher on the other side of the country (just Sweden, but still). Her requirements involved the monitors being able to go to 120hz and higher. My iiyama monitor could do 200(!)hz and was the ultimate underdog to Sony's Trinitron technology. It was called diamondtron as far as I can remember.
Why did she need them at any price? High refresh rates wasn't a thing with the TFT screens of the time. She just straight up bought them and sent a crate to my house and had them delivered over night. I think my asking price was a bit high but these were top of the line gaming monitors at the same. She would have paid triple the price, she was working with Uppsala uni with grant money for studying flies. How they could be so energy efficient, considering how little energy their brain consumes while doing complex calculations in flight and stuff. She was charmingly passionate about the possibilities.
The Diamondtron was the Mitsubishi version. FWICR they were a Sony tube and the rest made by Mitsubishi
What does TFT stand for in this context?
@@Leamsi Thin Film Transistor. LCD basically
I also had an Iiyama back then and it was 120 W but 2048*1536 was great, diamondtron is Mitsubishi.
@@travelthetropics6190 and Mitsubishi were more willing to license the technology to manufacturers such as Iiyama.
A CRT monitor for gaming use is a work of art. And because of the much more beautiful 3D picture and because of the lack of input lag and because of zero pixel response time. All this taken together makes a CRT monitor an uncontested choice for use in games. But the saddest thing that happened after the gaming industry switched to LCD technology in monitors was a drop in the quality of the games themselves (!) on the market, which now, played by players on LCD monitors, with high input lag and long response times, could not provide a truly high-quality gaming experience. If CRT technology is not revived in the future, just as vinyl records, tube amplifiers and magniplanar headphones have been revived, the entire gaming industry may be subject to a deep crisis.
@11:00 I had an extremely similar kind of experience recently, I dug my xbox 360 out of my parents place and hooked it up my 4k monitor and it looked horrible. But once I hooked it up to a 1080p plasma display, something which would have been accurate to the time period, I literally can't tell it's 1080p, it looks so good and it's weird how we forget that and say the graphics have aged and they only looked good to other graphics of the era, when in reality display technology has changed and isn't capable of displaying how good things used to look.
I love how older games actually accounted for and took advantage of the way CRTs displayed pictures, like with the SOTN Dracula image
The game developers created the games with CRT monitors with their computers.
Technically:
I love how older games actually accounted for and took advantage of the limitations of NTSC color encoding, like how the red is wider on the Dracula image
@@doctordothraki4378 Game developers had to create their games for multiple markets back then. For markets that used the NTSC system, PAL and SECAM.
this isnt inherent to CRTs, but the video cables they used at the time! You wouldnt get the same effect with Linus' monitor since its RGB, but a console hooked to a TV over a composite cable mixes all the video signals into a signal wire, which blends color in a way that results in those kinds of distortions!
@@NicheAsQuiche Exactly! And because the signals are designed for humans, green is tied much more closely to the overall brightness. Red also tends to bleed horizontally.
I used to review monitors for a magazine and I remember being very proud of myself for being able to lift this thing up on a desk without breaking it or hurting myself.
I broke a desk with two smaller versions of this one. Straight up collapsed.
The screens were fine, thanks for asking.
I had the 24" Dell version of this for which I paid about £60 in 2003/2004. I upgraded to an lcd telly in 2007 and I do not regret going to 720p because of the trade off in size of the screen. The dell was almost as deep as it was wide. Like John, I was proud the day I took it from my car, went up four flights of steps and placed it gently down while my shoulders and arms were on fire. I updated to a 1080p lcd screen within one or two years. $3000 is a joke for something that basically benefits only the retro feel.
@@goblinphreak2132 Goblin you do understand that most people struggle with 100lbs,let alone a 200lb crt! You must be popular when friends are moving home!
@@faisalkl The Sony FW900 and the Dell version you claim to have had went way higher than 720p or 1080p, it could happily do 2880x2560 or 2560x1600p @ 85Hz, 1920x1200 @ 120Hz, it is far beyond a retro monitor, sure thanks to CRTs being able to display low resolution so beautifuly it can happily show 640x480, a 720p LCD would have been a huge downgrade for an FW900 owner.
@@olivermood8003 @Oliver Mood yes it could do much higher than 1080p and my go to resolution was 1920x1200. However if I went higher than 1200p my eyes would hurt like crazy after a few minutes and I never found any sweet spot better than that. Funnily enough, I run at 4k on a 28" with basically a higher dpi and no ill effects on my eyes. I was well into running the Dell at high refresh rates so don't know what caused the discomfort but it is possible I was doing something wrong. The picture quality was sublime though!
This thing is crazy, why do they not still make these things?
(6:46) The smile of someone who got a Christmas gift and is using it for the first time
Oh man, it brought back so many memories hearing Linus describe Aperture Grille technology, and the little horizontal lines that the technology necessitated. I worked at Apple, who used Trinitron tubes for their Studio Displays, in the early 2000s, and fielded a handful of calls about those lines. I explained -- from our training -- pretty much exactly what Linus said. You stop noticing them after a while, but the moment your attention is called to them, they're all you can see.
It’s sort of amazing that it took this long for other display technologies to *just now* make up for the features we lost when CRTs were discontinued. And some features in particular, like being able to operate natively at lower resolutions, still hasn’t really been replicated.
Yes and not even OLED hasn't been able to fully "mimic" CRT behaviour.
It's just a shame that we havent' really improved in image quality exept for resolution and HDR.
@@kingotime8977 and brightness, and black levels. So quite an improvement
@@kingotime8977 in some ways haven’t improved in image quality either, true resolution is measured as dpi or dots per inch not 1366x768 pixels they don’t even advertise dpi anymore at all, and resolution still gets conflated with image size and pixels by pixels all the time
Yes big flatscreen displays may have 720p hd or better 1366x768 or better yada yada, but I find I need two monitors to run two programs, we’re on crt monitor running at 400x600 or 600x800 or whatever it was I could cascade or tile or arrange windows as I wanted running 3 or 4 programs comfortably at once sharing that small crt real estate and still see everything quite clearly.
Flat screen just need two monitors, some of this is the trend from “programs” to “apps” and poor or no optimization anymore, but a lot of it is the display itself from what I can tell, and a lot of it is the programs and desktop icons change size or you end up needing to use larger desktop icons on bigger resolution instead of the standard ones, and many icons and programs don’t scale up well at all, it’s like blowing up or scaling up a photo without the negatives, it blurs and distorts
Text based programs and iconography designed for older versions of windows don’t scale well now days. Sometimes it’s better to read on a phone or tablet because the desktop world is formatted for video content now not text, where phones still have optimizations behind the scenes for better text readability and tablets are closely linked to e ink and e readers and iPads are same size nowadays as a sheet of paper roughly and have reproducibility to be concerned with for reading text and artists drawing with Apple Pencil or something
Computer displays now compared to crts or other methods of reading are like comparing a tv or monitor to an overhead projector or slide projector, yes you can read on one but why when the experience is so poor or bad or distorted.
@@tristanwegner Blacks on CRTs are much better, unlike OLED that just switches pixels of, CRTs can handle unlimited amounts of greyscale and retain detail in even the darkest scenes, trying to play horror games or watch dark movies/TV shows on OLED is not easy as you canny make anything out, CRTs can happily show so many different shades of black, from the darkest of dark to the most subtle shades of blacks.
This has also happened within LCD technology. Plasma displays are insane, they have outrageous 40k+:1 contrast ratios and produce very nice images with good internal response times, the move away from plasma to LED was another regression that we are just now digging our way out of with OLEDs
Everything Linus touches: drops
Every tech Linus reviews: *inflates in value by a gazillion*
Sad for consumers.
i didnt have that sony but had a really nice "professional" 21" crt when i went off to college in 2000. i cant remember the brand or model anymore, just that i got it used from the IT guy of a company owned by a family friend who recently upgraded his. that thing was an absolute beast, weighed about 500lbs but was amazing for everything. playing FPS games on it was better than anything ive seen since pretty much everything switched to lcd/led/oled. wish i still had it but sold it off before one of my moves because i just didnt want to mess with hauling it around anymore and didnt realize what a gem it truly was.
I had one of these. It was the last CRT I bought. It was a great monitor, and I was able to set it to a custom resolution of 2304x1440 in the nVidia driver, making it the highest resolution of any monitor available at the time (unless you count things like the unobtainable IBM T221 LCD monitor). I used to play Guild Wars on it in that resolution. Eventually it started to develop issues, though, as CRTs can be finicky. I had to ship it to Sony's place in Southern California for in-warranty repairs (the shipping cost a ton), and that started a nightmare of *terrible* customer service that lasted months. In any case, the best way to run this monitor for the clearest picture was from the VGA out on the graphics card to the 5-BNC inputs on the back. It made a noticeable improvement in picture clarity over VGA to VGA. Hard to believe it's been over ten years now since that all went down. I'm glad we eventually graduated to LCDs, as they cost much less to ship and aren't as prone to develop the same kinds of annoying issues over time. I currently have a Dell UP3218K.
One of the 'quality' measures of a CRT was its dot pitch, which referred to the distance between pixels ("picture elements"). Crappy, low end monitors had a .51 dot pitch, where as the standard was .28. IIRC, it got down to like .23 or .21 in the consumer segment? Either way, this was important when you were driving higher resolutions with smaller fonts. (Trying to recall from 25+ years ago when i was working at CompUSA) we'd put up 1024x768 (SVGA, Baby!) resolution, and open up something like Word or Notepad. Change the font size to like 6. On the .51 dot pitch monitors, the letter "a" was nearly unreadable as the pixels were simply too far apart to give you a recognizable character. Cut that gap down to .28 and now all the pixels that make up the "a" were closer together which brought the "a" into focus (not literally, but that's the best way to describe it.)
Completely unrelated...kinda... The Amiga with a Commodore 1084S monitor was still the bomb gaming setup for MANY years. You wanna dig into history? Do a retro reflection video of that platform.
I remember walking into a CompUSA back in the day and they had a row of PC CRTs setup, the Sony G400 stood out of the crowd due to its higher aperture grille contrast punch vs the shadow mask CRTs around it, I ended up buying the G400 it was a great monitor and one of many CRTs I'd end up owning, the G520P & FW900 were my favorites and I regret not having the FW900 repaired after the flyback transformer failed.
I think most high end monitors used .23 dot pitch.
The dot pitch measured the distance between physical shadow mask elements, not the pixels themselves. You could have pixels smaller than your dot pitch occasionally - I remember seeing that in the days of .39 dot pitch "interlaced" vs .28 dot pitch "noninterlaced", referring to whether 1024x768 pixel resolution was displayed interlaced or not. On a .39 display, that resolution had a kind of supersampled/downrezzed look, where you could somehow tell that there was more detail behind the shadow mask, but you weren't getting all of it.
@@jimmay8627 That's true. Because the mask only affected which part of the phosphor coating was getting hit by the electron beam, it was/is theoretically possible that the beam power (an in practice brightness of phosphor) of a single dot changes in the middle of dot (assuming beam focusing is sharp enough which didn't happen with cheaper monitors). However, the mask dot pitch obviously puts heavy limitations of possible usable resolution because no information can be passed at the shadow parts of the mask.
1024x768 is XGA, SVGA is 800x600
I mean I'm happy that CRTs are getting covered by YTers of this size but at the same time the price of them are now gonna get even higher
At the same time, maybe it will inspire those sitting on forgotten CRTs to list them up for sale.
but maybe that will make a company aware that there is a market for CRTs, it's pretty niche but hey it's a gap in the market
hmm..what if someone decided to make new production CRTs? there is certainly a market for high quality, AVAILABLE CRTs...
Yeeees 😍
@@GameCyborgCh For maybe a few thousand people within the entire world? Absolutely not. I see the appeal of CRTs for their niche use cases but that's all it is. An extremely niche group.
Imagine how good CRT would be if they had continued developing and producing them till now.
Like he said in the video, they had been in development fr 60 years, so they've more or less reached their peak when the last one came out, unless someone crazy decides to put millions into R&D hoping to get something better
@@shivansh7152 In essence, that is what the Trinitron is. Sony wanted to improve on the CRT design to allow cleaner, brighter images. They poured a lot of money into the aperture grill design. When the fw900 released in 2001 almost all monitors 19"-21" could only do 1600x1200 or 1920x1400. the FW900 could do 160hz at 1280x960 along with a few of the other 21-22" Trinitron monitors from other manufacturers. I had 4, including an IBM and a DiamondTron and all could hit 160-200hz refresh rate at lower resolutions. These were the best for competitive quake and cs play.
У меня сдох 22 дюймовый NEC MultiSync FE2111SB 😢😢😢😢 Твм сначала контакт пропадал, стукнеш и заработает, я все платы лупой просмотрел и кое где пропаял и бесполезно. А сегодня вообще перестал стартавать, мигает индикатор (светодиод)😢😢😢
А моник то топчик, один из последних по качеству, кинескоп Diamondtron, это крутой конкурент Тринитрона
My favorite part of this video was learning the Windows Shift Arrowkey shortcut to move windows from one screen to another. As someone who uses a (gasp!) HDMI tv monitor as a second display, this was sometimes an issue if I had the other display disconnected or off for whatever reason. Issue no more!
Dude same!!!
Well windows 11 fixed that specific issue of changing setups. however it brought many bugs and visual glitches with multi virtual desktops
Man, I think CRT monitors helped us remember old games and how we imagined them to look so good, like how remastered versions look today. Perhaps games dont need an actual remaster, just a good old crt monitor.
Correct!
Yep. I first played DKC on my Sony KV-27S25 and it looked great. Plugged it into my dad's OLED and it looked like total garbage.
As I already said up above, the problem with remasters isn't that the original looked better by older hardware, but that many remasters look bad because they're incompetently done. Bioshock and Starcraft are two that immediately spring to mind. Fable afaik got panned for its remaster too though I played neither. This is because artistry in gaming is partly making all things work together, even if say realtime pathtracing isn't a thing and so you need all kinds of tricks done in raster which can make it look better than badly done RT, and alleged "HD texture packs" tend to do this by clashing wildly with everything else that's put together to go well in the original game, that now does not.
It's because remasters tend to also only modify some parts of it and not others, and then not use something which really looks right on its own compared to the original artistic vision which looked more cartoony or blocky but still just looked better while being of poorer technical visual quality, and then on top of it all often ends up clashing with the very message or theme of the original game itself. Like just imagine if you took some old grainy movie's musical score, removed the tinny old staticy, low-fi, poor quality sound, and then upgraded that by...adding modern rock music to a black and white crime noir. Or imagine if you removed the old original chipset sound of 90s console games, and "remastered" it by introducing...jazz music and Lady Gaga. In Resident Evil. It doesn't suck because it's just a technical problem, it sucks because it's badly done and it clashes with everything else.
I grew up then. Linus' monitor is a multithousand dollar piece of equipment which costs far more than a midrange computer today, even at scalper pricing--for just the monitor. This is a basically 1440p display from VGA period. No game was ever made to look good on that particular monitor; they were made for my family's and friends' monitors and TVs. They may look better in a sense, but they still looked like ass, because it was late 90s. Everything looked like low fidelity minecraft. That's why retrogamers all use pixels stuff, because that is how it all looked even back then on period correct technology. Imagine somebody trying to cargo cult late 90s games, and then cargo culting all the absolute worst aspects that I'm glad are dead and gone, only to leave out the only good thing they often had which was SOUL. Fallout, Baldur's Gate, Planescape, these had soul, Starcraft, Jedi Knight Academy, but they all looked awful and so terrible was it visually that for about a good 10 years the thing that mattered most to gamers was better graphics(partly because I don't think it ever occurred to us the storytelling, artistry, and mechanics would degrade in the process)
t. cranky 90s boomer
I want to see how the retro games look on a plasma.
When I was in high school, the guy who taught me how to build computers sold KDS monitors with Trinitron tubes that were just as good but cost way less than the Sony monitors. I used that thing until it died, and I replaced it with a Sony Trinitron screen in 2008. Since its death, I have been LCD. I do have to say I am enjoying the since and look of the 32" Dell curved gaming monitors. But this brings me back. The wire across the screen holding the grill in never bothered me, it was visible when you had a lot of white showing, but in gaming, all the colors and darks hide it.
I always knew that there's something cool about the analogue "old school" tech. From audio amplifiers to image displays.
I went through a couple weeks of using my old CRT monitor when my LCD monitor went out and was waiting for payday to replace, and I really enjoyed how well modern titles at the time looked on CRT. I almost considered using the CRT longer, but it was old, bulky and had some slight screen burn. Plus I would have to buy a new desk just for it eventually if I did as I had to play with my keyboard right at the edge of the desk. May have to set it up again eventually to play emulated games on. Who knows, maybe it'll look better. I have OLED now and emulated games look blocky. This gave me an idea to try though. Thanks.
The thing I miss most about CRT's is when you have a demanding game, you can switch to a lower resolution and it still looked good. However, I think it's a fair tradeoff for LCD's size, weight and power consumption.
i remember in the early 2000s i would play pretty much every game possible on a 400 euro 2003 family desktop, even the newest game like prince of persia, rayman, morrowind etc would run no problem because i would run them at 480p sometime even lower, i was so use to that, that the concept of graphic card and graphic performance was alien to me. so when i made the transition to lcd it was rough " hum oblivion sure is struggling, i will lower the resolution to 480p.....why does it look like shit" .
but we didn't have a choice as media started to leave 4:3 to 16:9, i couldn't play my xbox360 anymore as most game would just be cut on all corner and most text was unreadable.
fun fact : i played skyrim day one on a old crt television from 1999 and it did a great job at hidding the ugliness of the game.
its basically DLSS imo: you drop the rendered resolution, the image quality stays the same and FPS take a boost
@@champ6436
Screens that generate their light from the panel itself and not from a projected light have always and will always look better due to the way our eyes work and our brain processes the information. It's to help with things like pattern recognition which allows us to see things like tigers hiding in the forest undergrowth.
I remember running Crysis on my 8800 GTX and a 1920x1200 display and actually downgrading to the 16:10 equivalent of 720p just because it was still better looking than high resolution and low everything else. That stupid game was so demanding on hardware of the time. Though I also didn't have a very good CPU... my PC was a bit lopsided since I was 14 and had no idea how to make a PC properly.
And resolution
I just sold *ONE of these in my Patreon Yard-Sale.. Neither one to Linus, shame. EDIT: 2nd Unit Winner pulled out, So expect Unit 2 back in the June Yardsale.
EDIT, you should take the bezel off and peel away the Plastic anti-glare coating. get a ton of NITS back
Funny seeing you here, like your headphone reviews
Ooof. i wish I could get my hands on one.
@@largejoe2195 Why thank you Joe Rogan I like your hair products.
@@ZReviews Never change Z, never change.
I really enjoyed your video on these a few weeks back.
I never thought I'd miss my old monitor as much as I do right this moment. Didn't realize how big of a role it played in the experience of not just old games, but for sure old artwork as well. Imagine how it effected even forum avatars back then, damn. Nostalgia will be the death of me.
I regret throwing mine out in the 2000's when they blew a capacitors.
I've got a massive 36in Panasonic CRT TV and just so happens it works with my video card. Only at 480p output, but playing my ROMs never looked better lol. Thing weighs a ton, I still can't believe I managed to unload it and bring it inside by myself without dropping it or paralyzing myself. There were rolling chairs, 2 red wagons, and planks involved lol
create custom resolution in windows for 240p
I would love to rock a CRT but they just have one massive drawback. Most of the good ones have been all used up and are impossible to repair or best case is to get a slightly less used up one. They are all on the clock and only going up in price and it is such a huge bummer they are no longer in production. It is understandable why, but it would be so cool if someone took the technology a little farther and still produced fresh, wide aspect ratio crt monitors possibly with a proper DAC built in.
I’d be cool if like Samsung, asus or any company like this would come up with like a limited production of CRTs just for the fuck of it
In the past two years I have snagged a dozen or so CRT TVs and monitors for free. One of the monitors has some burn in but the rest are in great shape. One of them is an old RCA pattern Colortyme console TV from the '80s and one is a Panasonic from the '90s with their pinhole type shadow mask but the rest are all Trinitron pattern. I used a couple of Trinitron monitors from 1995-2009. I keep a Toshiba flat Trinitron pattern 27" VCR/DVD combo in my living room for movies and a Sharp curved type Trinitron pattern 27" in my master suite for playing all my old consoles. Currently, I just have SNES, Gamecube and Wii, plus a Retron NES clone but I really want another PS2. I ended up owning 5 of them because I would think I was done, sell it and then eventually want another one. Dreamcast is getting too expensive so I just emulate that on an older laptop with analog output.
One thing I need to do is get busy and start adding component input to all my TVs.
7:28 The red bleed comes from limitations in NTSC color encoding in TVs. It's not found in technically superior RGB space like most computer monitors (sort of alluded to at 14:04).
15:17 Says Aperture Grille, shows a slot mask (not a shadow mask like at 15:12)
Yep, Linus’ staff didn’t quite do all their homework
15:26 "Trinotron"
yeah agreed @lolkLogan, it seems like the videos are more rushed lately
Would be cool if CRTs were still produced and improved, for me the major downside of them is their great weight and size while having small screens, that seems hard to overcome.
My dad repairs old TV's as a hobby and sometimes for museums, and one of the ones he gave me that was "too new" for his collection is a Samsung 32" CRT tv that was basically the last series they made before turning to flat panels. I love it because it's the only CRT I've seen that has HDMI and does 1080i; I put a stream stick on it and turned it into a smart tv. Nothing like watching youtube on an old CRT in high resolution.
I remember how disappointed I was with my first LCD TV, because all the channels looked like dog crap. CRT basically has native up-scaling as a physical property.
That's cause all it's gotta do is make the electron beams closer together or farther apart, is also why when things get bigger (beams farther apart ) they get washed out colors like watering down paint
It's more auto-scaling than upscaling since most CRT TV never get past SD (525-625 lines). And LCD TVs still fail to adjust lower definitions than their native one. BTW if you're trying to use a CRT TV with a computer that can display higher RGB resolutions (likely something like a Commodore Amiga or an Atari Falcon) you will have a TV that will flicker in a very painful way.
I point blank refused 720p when digital came out. I settled on a 24" 1080 when I did switch, people called me crazy now some 20 years later...
Intel tech upgrade in 2 years:
Linus: "Anthony, is this LMG's CRT monitor?"
Anthony: "Well, nobody was using it, sooooo...."
*I do hope he gets to use it, he's the one that will appreciate it the most and i'm sure he will keep it in the best shape
Maybe make a retro gaming setup in the office so that all employees can enjoy it during break rather than a single person. But should a single person get to use it, my vote is Anthony.
Yeah, where do I sign the petition that Anthony gets this monitor?
Nah. Anthony being a true retro gamer, would dismiss it for not being 4:3.
Retro games are better on a large 480i TV. 4:3, high brightness, easy support for 240p, RGB hookups, etc;
They might as well just sell it tbh, even a heavily used, worn-out FW-900 is worth a small fortune and wouldn't just end up sitting in a UA-camr's warehouse of unused tech.
11:07 Instantly in my head i heard "ROLLING AROUND AT THE SPEED OF SOUND!!!"
I used to have a 25-inch Sony CRT TV that had the S-Video plug in. Man, was that a big jump in picture quality from the old school yellow video cables! All the old school game consoles, from NES-PS2/OG Xbox, looked AMAZING with that.
12:25 not having a native resolution is by far the CRTs absolute best feature
The black levels are also fantastic, and they're effectively kind of HDR. I think it's a lot of the reason why there was(relatively) so much use of lighting effects in older 3D games(eg: Heretic II), as it looked great.
@@DoubleMonoLR OG Doom looks godlike on that Sony FW900
@@DoubleMonoLR a couple of days ago i tried fatal frame 2 on a crt, pissed my pants
CRTs do technically have a native resolution, because the holes in the shadow mask/aperture grille are only so big. Any DPI that deviates from that isn't "native".
Actually the it is often the circuits that drive the guns rather than the phosphorus that get "tired" and debalanced. To calibrate them and restore proper white points and brightness there are trimmers (variable resistors) on the board inside the monitor, usually in the back of the tube. I have calibrated more monitors than I can count that people were going to trash and gave them another 10 years of useful life. Be careful when you do that because you work on the high side of the circuits - voltages like 15-30KV are usual. The front side setting are only for fine adjustments - the gross adjustments are in the back. Now, if someone let the screen in full sun for months on end, you can still improve the image a bit by adjusting it from the back
Yeah Adrien's Basement has a ton of good videos on how to do this kind of work, mainly for older tube monitors for pcs. And depending on the specific monitor, I've heard of recaps being very effective.
How would you increase brightness? Is it the G2 dial on the flyback and the RGB gain and cutoff pots? Adjusting the anode voltage?
@@metaleggman18 absolutely a fantastic source, i think he's in Portland Oregon? a collab would be sick.
19:17 this is a Slot Mask, the rest of the CRT industries response to the Trinitron Aperture Grille. It used the same vertical stripes arrangement of the phosphors and got around the Trinitron patent by putting staggered rows of crossbars between the verticals. It also was made to be used with the "spherical" front glass where Trinitron's grille was stretched tight and only curved horizontally. Slot Mask also did away with the one or two visible horizontal stabilization wires in the Trinitron's grille. Later ones used much smaller stabilizer wires but they're still visible.
The Slot Mask greatly improved brightness but sacrificed a bunch of image sharpness the old dot triad shadow mask and round phosphor dots were capable of. Eventually the Slot Mask holes were made much smaller (for some higher priced, higher resolution computer monitors) to get back to the sharpness of dot triad. Televisions and arcade monitors stuck with the big old slot mask rectangles.
Another issue with CRTs that Trinitron solved was heat warping of the shadow or slot mask. Being a thin sheet of metal stamped into a section of a sphere, and punched full of tiny holes, they were not very dimensionally stable. When cold they'd be slightly misaligned with the phosphors and had to be designed so that at operating temperature they'd expand/warp *into alignment*.
Taking a cue from Trinitron's stretched grille, a new variant of the slot mask was developed where the mask was stretched tightly then glass molded around the edges. That assembly was then melted or bonded between the back shell and front glass of the CRT. Alignment was thus always perfect and the display flat. Advances in signal processing and electron beam control allowed for the constant change of focus required as the beams swept the raster.
Sony would also adopt the flat grille, as seen on their WEGA televisions and the monitor in this video.
The timing of Sony's Trinitron patents was nearly perfect. When they expired, competitors like Mitsubishi (Diamondtron) only had about three years to capitalize on the technology before the LCD rendered the CRT obsolete.
When I moved from the drawing board to the CAD system back in the late 80's the hardware we used was a Compaq 386 and we had a 14 inch command monitor (CRT) that displayed in that lovely brownish colour and a whopping 21" CRT that was connected with individual cables for the RGB to a special graphics card in the PC which was to give wysiwyg when printed. I was told that the PC cost 3k, the Graphics card was another 3k, the AutoCad software cost 3k and the big monitor cost 4k, this was all DOS based so no screensavers and my huge monitor got screen burn due to certain sections being lit up all day. So, in a roundabout kind of way what I am saying is don't buy a CRT monitor that was used in the DOS years as it is probably f^&$ed no matter how good it may seem.
"I could never afford this kind of thing as a kid or teenager"
I felt that.
I was lucky to get one console from every generation, but the gaming pc's I saw in magazines were a pipe dream.
Now I have setup that was like $3k and no time to play anything.
My whole ambition is quickly becoming to work as little as possible because man I feel that, but even in my early 20s is like "have some time to play, no money" now I have as many games as I want on a great system and no time. Eventually plan for most people is grow old, have lots of money and lots of free time but very little time left lol
@@pandemicneetbux2110 Yeah... where was Gamepass 15 years ago?
@@HAWXLEADER Game Pass replaced the game rental shops/services. :\
@@pandemicneetbux2110 Oh, the joys of capitalism.
Still remember this girl had a badass sony setup, back in the mid-late 90s when Sony was going high-end. The entire setup was LIGHTYEARS past my rigged-up e-machines. Her Dad was a car salesman with no tech background, have to imagine some sales team took him for a ride lol.
Long time CRT fan here, Thanks for this great homage. The only thing that give me peace that crt are dead (or dying) is the work of Mike Chi and his Retrothinks. With upcomming 4k60hz scaler's the future is looking good to have great CRT like "retro-filter".
It will be different, the CRT is beaming the picture to the eyes 1 pixel at a time, taking longer to draw the whole picture 1 pixel at a time, while OLED is drawing the whole frame and is NOT drawing individual pixels one at a time. The brain knows it gets more feeling watching the CRT, especially at the CASINO.
Gotta say, I love Adam adding to the background responses. His monologue is so fun XD
im so happy you guys displayed sa2 on that thing but also now i really feel the need to own one
Man, imagine what a modern designed CRT monitor would look like...
would look like the best gaming screen ever.
Rear projection. Three six inch CRTs for each color channel, thus eliminating the need for a dot mask or aperture grille, and allowing 4k+ resolutions. Probably only 2 pounds per diagonal inch, if not less. Because the tubes are smaller, the electron guns don't need to travel as far for the same refresh, making higher refreshes possible.
Also, having the DAC (or better yet, three of them -- ideally 10-bit or higher) inside of the monitor so you can have a DisplayPort connection out the back of it.
If you could use totally black room, you can still go with CRT video projectors. Those are *really* finicky to tune (I had one about 20 years ago) but they have all the plus sides of CRT monitors and if you use matte screen instead of silver screen, the viewing angle is equally good to CRT monitors. I used to run PS2 with about 80" image around year 2000 and because CRT (being totally analog technology) has no native resolution, it was able to render everything the video signal had.
That's the thing about technology. As we stop using it, we lose the knowledge. CRTs made today use the simplest and cheapest 80's design. There's no improvement, and even "deprovement". New Vinyl and cassete players are garbage compared to even mid line ones from the 70's and 80's.
It's not that it's not worth it... it's that it's not possible. To make a copy of that monitor, the amount of R&D needed, build up to create the components would be greater than what it was at the time.
It's the same reason we can't build a Saturn V today. We don't have the technology anymore. It's effectively lost.
Though this one isn’t really a crt but here one of his videos on something that would be close to it ua-cam.com/video/Ngy9TIbREJE/v-deo.html
Love the CRT content but a few things I noticed!
You can absolutely use active DP and even some HDMI adapters with CRTs, they are just a little finnicky to get working and you have to use programs like Custom Resolution Utility to push high framerates and resolution
Also that dreamcast is pushing 480p to that monitor, it's one of the few game consoles that can natively output it over VGA! I don't believe that Monitor can even run at a 15khz H-refresh rate to take 480i and 240p signals. Typically only monitors meant for broadcast TV do
yeah about 95% of dreamcast games supported 480p progressive scan mode with the vga box, which were already plentiful and easy to find back in 2000.
it's not like the Gamecube or PS2, where a minority of games supported progressive. The games that didnt support progressive where usually 2d games like SNK fighters.
Funfact, where I live, our Xbox [og] didnt support anything but 480i, and they looked like bad. PAL users got shfted by Microsoft in image quality.
@@anasevi9456 most GameCube games that you would care to play support progressive scan, but the only way to output 480p natively is with a first party adapter that sells for like $350 now.
Bro just get the wii to component cables. Wii uses the same connector as gamecube iirc. These 3rd party cables legit cost 10$ and work great.
@@nebby3 Yeah I should correct my comment to say 480p over VGA (RGBHV). PS2, Gamecube, and Xbox all support at least 480p over YPbPr (Component) but the circuitry for decoding those signals isn't in computer monitors for whatever reason. So you have to find converters for that which are pretty niche, the only one I know of is by the Beharbros, the same people who made the dreamcast box they use in the vid
Edit: Also your xbox comment is super wild considering some games support 720p and 1080i on the OG Xbox in NA!
@@nebby3 This isn't as true as is used to be, check out the GC-Video Project, the whole port has been reversed engineered and there's clone solutions on the market for cheaper now
Also the Wii is an option like that other guy said but is known to have slightly softer quality
So a couple of years ago I was working at a retail store (not an electronics store, mind you) and I see this TV in a shopping cart in the back. It's an old Samsung TX-R2435 Dynaflat TV just sitting by the dumpster door!
I ask "where'd that TV come from?" The receiving DH told me someone left it over by the contractor side of the store. So I promptly carted it to a plug and turned it on. The blue input lit up my life and I said, "I'm taking this home! Don't touch it!"
So after work, I haul the TV to my Jeep, stick in the front seat, pick up one kid from daycare, haul ass home, drop the TV off on my driveway, go pick up the other kid from school, come back, and after the kids were situated I played Duck Hunt for the first time in DECADES! Now it's part of my collection if I ever want the retro experience again. All for free, baby!
Where is Erik’s comment, Linus…
Look down in new comments dum dum
And people called me crazy when I got my 4:3 HD 32" Sony Trinitron CRT TV in 2006. It had the good of each world. It did 1080i or p, really cant remember but it also did console gaming like no other. I did retire it when I moved and gave it to my cousin and he still has it and his kids play retro games on it to this day. Damn thing weighed about 250 lbs maybe even 300 lbs.
And then on the PC side we had 24" trinitrons that did 2048x1536 at 85hz.
It did 1080i most likely. People gave a lot of crap to 1080i but that's only because they were viewing it on the wrong display. 1080i on a CRT whether it be a VGA monitor or a HD CRT looked amazing
Yeah, but it sucked for 240p content. Don't buy hd crts for retro games, kids :D
@@superslash7254 Somehow the higher resolution felt like it was murdering my eyeballs and that was when I was in my 20's. nowadays I run 4k on a 28"screen now have no issues with eye fatigue.
Thing is, even the cheapest CRT would give you perfect motion, next to zero input lag, and at least 85hz. While the cheapest LCD will have bad color, horrible ghosting, noticeable input lag, and only 60hz. LCD tech had only "caught up" at the highest (and priciest) end.
i hooked a 32inch 1366x768 HDTV to a PC 17 years ago. and today my monitor is still 32 inch
The cheapest LCDs cost less new than the cheapest CRTs did at the time. Good luck getting a new desktop crt for 60 dollars (which comes out to around 100 dollars in 2022 money).
So one major thing Linus missed. The CRT advantage is basically mainly for gaming. For real work, including graphics work - you need an LCD based display (or one of the newer off-tech that branches off from it). So unless you mainly only game on the PC, then a CRT will be basically trash. I went from a high end CRT to a mid-range lcd screen in the AMD Althon X2 days, and will say - LCD wins. Just don't buy some cheapo LCD today as even the quality of LCD varied as much as it did back in the day vs today when you shop ultra cheap, vs not cheap but not costly.
But cheap CRT would do high pitch noises and you could not sit before them for longer time periods. The even flickerd a lot. The first, cheapest, LCD with 60Hz had no flickering at all.
@@stonium69 you can often get crt for free
And the horizontal lines at about 1/3 from the top and 1/3 from the bottom (two lines total that appear in just about every Trinitron display) are shadows from the stabilizer wires used to hold the elements of the shadow mask perfectly parallel. They were a necessary evil to make sure everything lined up precisely for the sharpest image.
11:20
VHS copies of cartoons aired on TV are some of the best ways to watch them. The motion is so fluid the only thing that beats it is a DVD version of the same thing with period correct hw.
It's kinda crazy to think that when we (the olds) were kids, we witnessed what was probably the peak of CRT quality, given the extreme rarity of unopened or unused units in the present day. And unless some niche company decides to make some brand-new, we'll be the only ones who got to see it.
This gave me chills lol
@@austinwolfe7295 There are still a decent amount of good condition CRT monitors around, even a few new in box, so you can still experience top tier CRT displays for now at least.
@@olivermood8003 I miss my CRT Trinitron TV for Smash Melee, Sonic and F-Zero. They are unplayable on a traditional 60 or 75Hz LCD, specially 2D Sonic,
"Did I just waste my freakin' money!?"
Linus: Yes... but also no.
The retro games comparison was AMAZING. Because there's this thing where we think "Oh that game looked awesome!" and we see it today and it's total shit. But maybe, the fact that the technology was different had a part to play in it. Although idk if with a cheap generic CRT or TV this would apply. Like not many people would've had this Sony monitor I don't think.
Depends how you connected. A lot of people will have used composite or RF which look terrible. Most probably didn’t have VGA adapter for Dreamcast which was a huge leap.
Like Linus mentioned, cheap monitor or a TV are even better for console games.
@@Blox117 nope scanlines are usually part of the design, so not having them in some games makes them look less shaded
CRT Monitors with speakers, Component inputs and VGA were rare and extremely pricy. Most consumers had 480i CRT TV's which looked nothing like a 2048x1536 36" NEC Monitor. Nor did they pay 20000$ usd
@@Blox117 This guy knows. It really depends what monitor you're on because a high end monitor now wipes the floor with CRT, or even just 1440p75, 1080p144 etc. I played Fallout 2 on a normal civilian monitor and it looked bad but we dealt with it because it's what we had, and one of the biggest reasons why "better graphics" became the whole focus of the industry from early 90s throughout the 2000s until the stagnation period of 2010s. It's because if you played Thief even not knowing better you could tell how bad it was just based by what impressed us back then (he shot a bottle and it shattered! wow! so lifelike!) and how low our real expectations.
Like I couldn't even imagine being a kid shown today's technology even just the numbers like consumer grade 16 core, hyperthreaded, 4.9ghz chips with northbridge on it and 32[G]b RAM, [T]b storage, microSD, graphical accelerator cards with a hundred times the VRAM that are many times faster than CPUs etc., let alone being shown today's games. I'd just be so blown away, that I've honest to God sat here and thought "if I could tempt you as a devil, young me, what's the most I could've gotten out of you by offering this system in exchange for sacrificing something else, even part of your future" and realized I'd get a hell of a lot out of old me. That's practically "die at age 30 in a car crash no family or friends and fall to Hell" tier to a late 90s kid, and it's not just the graphics, which 1999 me would literally not be able to distinguish from photographs and live action acting[iirc motion capture just started around that year], but also the full scale to mechanics, even though most genres had already been developed by then. This includes things like destructible environments, combined effect mechanics like oil+fire in D:OS2, getting thrown from vehicles and real damage to cars or falling from planes in GTAV, and all that is mid-2010s.
I also went LCD in 2004 I remember the day very vividly lol. This was so cool to watch man
I remember switching from a CRT to an LCD display (“wow, it’s so light and crisp”), apart from the weight the biggest difference was the turning it on and off experience. It was still a VGA port (DVI was something only rich people had, I thought) so I remember changing the cable yo improve the quality. The white beefy guy was warm, you could pit things _on_ it, I was afraid to have floppies near it as well as other magnetic stuff and changing any settings wouldn’t do that much. An LCD looked so modern to me back then and I had extra desk space. Sometimes being not that rich gives you more appreciation of what you’ve got (I don’t even consider buying anything less than 4K DCI-P3 accurate now while I was happy to finally have a computer of my own (!) then). We had a machine that could browse the web and edit Word documents, but choosing all 12 fractions/players (instead of 3, for example) in Warcraft 3 made it almost unbearable to play but that made you feel the limitations of the machine. It’s always personal when you meet the boundaries of what a piece of tech can do and when you cope with it, be it an old TV (“a _really_ flat screen? Omg!”), a desktop computer or any other thing.
It feels almost illegal to see a video about CRTs without a few words from John Linneman about their benefits
Who
Truth
@@ancientaliensarecoming7201 john linneman is a member of the digital foundry channel, they mainly talk about videogames, graphics technology, history of videogames, and other technical stuff.
@@ancientaliensarecoming7201 digital foundry. They have actually consulted on a few of LTT's retro games video and game engine optimization videoes
Well they do show a clip of one of his DF videos at 17:55.
One MAJOR drawback of CRTs is the power consumption. A modern 24" panel is going to take between 40-50 watts, while the FW-900 sucks down 170 watts. That's possibly 4 times more power.
It’s okay, now your GPU which is 1/10 of the size is sucking more power that that😂
I also had a hell of a job wall mounting my CRT
Well that's a crazy monitor. My much more reasonable A90f+ uses only 60 watts.
Max size too, and the respective power draw
@@wilkinlow At full power? Yes.
On idle, watching a movie, or when doing office stuff? not by chance.
Having "natural" anti aliasing is one of the analog benefits. I can recall my memories about my MSI Dual GPU R3870X2 and I never needed to turn on anti aliasing b/c of my crt screen back in the days :)
Great video, I have an 55'' OLED and A 27" Trinitron, and the Trinitron still can't be beat!
Still have my Iiyama VisionMaster 454 pro, this vid has encouraged me to break it out and find out if it still works... was a beast in it's day, not quite as nice as the sony, but super affordable.
I've heard it's still awesome, even if thr FW900 is the holy grail.
@@lepidotos fingers crossed! Some seriously big capacitors in there if something goes wrong.. lol
Exactly, the 454 is a beast, imo the diamontron series is better than the trinitron, because Sony just didn't try to improve it much when they still had their patent intact, once it got lifted and others were able to copy it, some copied and improved it. The 454 i have was sort of "new old stock", bought by a company and only used for a few weeks before being replaced by early LCDs and then kept in a box. Had to replace the main line capacitor tho, it blew up on me when i first powered it on and used it for a few hours, it was quite old anyway.
I've got an Iiyama VisionMaster 400 (found at the local dump, perfect condition), and it's really nice as well. I would be using it with my gaming rig, but for some reason windows completely locks up if I connect it...
@@marcindzamroga8945 only happens with your gaming rig or every other pc you tried it on?
I recently played Silent Hill 3 for the PS2 on a Philips CRT TV manufactured in November 2005. It has component input and I still have the official Sony PS2 component cables. Even though it is a 480i game, it is still to this day absolutely one of the most gorgeous gaming experiences I've ever had.
For many years my default monitors where iiyama 1600x1200 20" screens. Both of mine failed and I got 17" 1600x1200 screens until 20" LCD (which I still have). The colour on the CRT was bright and sharp. The two 20" LCD screen have very different colours to each other (and other flat screens). I think the CRT were 33kg. I had one on a arm lift but it bent out of shape with the weight.
During the 80s and 90s I used a colour 20" monitor with composite video inputs instead of a TV. It was connected to VCRs. Got a 34" (still 4:3) Sony Trinitron TV that took four of us to put onto the trolley.
The remaining 17" Sony and iiyama CRTs I gave to the History of Computing Museum along with a new never used 12" white monochrome screen and a 10" Hitachi green monochrome. and four car loads of 8-bit computer stuff. Last TV CRT set I sold off for a fiver (5GBP).
22 years ago I worked in an office where IT did over night updates remotely. So all computers were left on including the CRT screen. I could see everyone roll as the default refresh rate was the minimum. I adjusted them to the maximium the graphics card and monitor could support. What surprized me is no one noticed the scrolling screen or now the absence of it. Even those who had complained about eye strain and headaches in the late afternoon. Most worked on 17" 1024x768 screens and one 21" screen in reception was set at 640x480 but the operator couldn't explain to me why - it did mean the screen was easy to read from across the room.
I used to work at Panasonic back in the day when they made massive amounts of CRT's. We were visited once in 1997 by the "then" President Morishita. After his speech to the plant workers, he asked if anyone had any questions. It was there when I posed the question about being able to transition over to the newer technologies that were in the loom (plasma/lcd,etc). Morishita replied, "We are not a CRT business. We are in the communications/information/entertainment business and it's constantly changing. We will most certainly be able to adapt to it." My supervisor came to me afterwards and said that the President wanted to have lunch with me later in which I nervously attended. I expected a larger group, but it was just the President, his interpreter and myself. "AWKWARD!!!!!" He thanked me for my question earlier and told me cute little story: "When I was a young boy growing up in Japan, my family never threw out anything. We believed that everything had value and could be used to near 100% efficiency." He made an example of orange peels that most would discard and throw out. He claimed he used them to fuel lamps and small cooking stoves. I think this was his "Yoda" moment and his way to help reassure me of the company's future. I left late in 1997 and never knew what happened, but most of the plants closed down in my area. I wish I could segway into a few words from my sponsor ....... but unfortunately I don't have one. :(
The reason for the long start ups and being dim - this tube just needs a shot with a CRT rejuvenator to bring the guns back into spec and then it will be good for another 30 years. CRT rejuvenation is commonly done in the arcade community and usually you can bring a good tube back from the dead a few times.
*This* EXACTLY!
I need this to happen with my Sony PVM 20L2MD, I’m in the freakin Philippines and finding a CRT tech in rural areas, well good luck me.
@@chronology556 u can do it yourself it isn't hard
CRT rejuvinators don't work with Sony tubes. At best it'll do nothing, at worst, it'll kill it.
What do CRT rejuvenators actually do? Like how do they work?
Gotta love how old tech never seems to die and new tech is literally designed to.
There’s a reason it takes so long to warm up, it’s on its last legs. CRT televisions only last about 8 years, maybe 10
I still hope that SED/FED is being worked on in some lab somewhere. The insane SED/FED resolution potential makes 4K monitors look like 480p, and it can deliver the blackest of black plus near zero latency of CRTs.
To be fair, old tech literally costs an arm and a leg.
We complain about how Apple is overpriced now, but a DynaTAC 8000X costs $3,995 (adjusted for Inflation its about $10,000 today) for just a wireless phone.
If you want to cough up 10 grand, sure, there may be extremely durable and rugged laptops and phones in that bracket that will never die.
@@cosgrovefamily295 this is far from true and in cases that they don’t last they can be repaired.
@@zayneytem $2/hr Chinese slave labor brings prices down. Before China nearly all tech was manufactured in Japan, and before that the US.
I love seeing Linus so excited for the CRT
Had a NEC XP37 Xtra a couple years back. 36" viewable 4:3 monster with a 2048x1536 resolution. It had VGA, component input and RCA's with support for interlaced if needed. Nothing came close in pure precision when retro gaming or even playing games.
Holy hell, that is an obscure monitor. I can hardly find XP37 / XM37 on Google and Bing.
I’m glad to hear you gave Colton his job back, even if it is just to do 10 hour drives to pick up CRTs…
Windows+Shift+Arrow key... holy crap most useful tech tip ever. My third monitor is in my case and windows keep popping up in it sometimes and it's a pain to grab from this is a life saver
Windows+arrow repeated will move the window to the next snap point. Windows+Shift+arrow moves it immediately to the next display.
Yeah, found out about it when I had to connect my AV-Receiver with my PC via HDMI and realized it's not possible to just transfer audio. So I always have a nonexistant 3rd Monitor. Close second for me is windows + shift + s for making a quick screenshot.
if you use a CRT and UNITY ENGINE is the nightmare and literally the worst engine EVER, you need 2 displays and FORCE win shift arrow the game to the second monitor to set the resolution from 4k or 1440p to a lower like in my case with an NEC 4x3 tube to 16x10 on a 21" (19" viewable) or it will display window out of bounds plus Unity game's hud and overlays will be not in frame.
New shortcut I just learned as well, never knew this shortcut existed 😄
How did you guys not know that one, lol?
My dad had an old Made in Taiwan PROTON CRT TV, that thing lasted decades, it had great view angles and it was a blast when I played Sega Saturn and Dreamcast on it as a kid. He bought it like 40~50 years ago and it didn't die until few years back, hard to find a new TV with that kind of quality in both build and view quality these days.
At the end of the CRT-era many who played CS and Warcraft 3 and later WoW used NEC MultiSync FE990 monitors or "Flat screen" CRT monitors that became very popular like this Sony example here. I still have a DELL 0P0151 17" on my desk that works fine. My last gaming CRT monitor before switching over to an LCD was a LG studioworks 775n 17'. Its kinda sad that they stopped making CRT monitors all together. The modern and upcoming OLED monitors looks very promising to actually replicate the smooth feedback and colorful CRT monitor feeling.