This Fluoride Battery Could Mean Phone Batteries That Last a Week
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Scientists have been working on this alternative battery design since the 1970s, and now they’ve made a breakthrough. Is this the end of the lithium-ion battery?
Batteries! - • This New 'Perfect' Bat...
Order by December 20th and select 2-day shipping at checkout to get a Seeker T-shirt in time for Christmas - teespring.com/...
Get 20% off www.domain.com domain names and web hosting when you use coupon code SEEKER at checkout!
Read More:
Yin and yang: Opposites in nature, fluoride and lithium, compete for higher-energy batteries
www.purdue.edu...
“The chemical element that makes up most of today's batteries, lithium, may soon be challenged by its polar opposite on the periodic table: fluoride. Yes, the same stuff in toothpaste.”
A new battery concept based on fluoride ions may increase battery lifespans
www.sciencedai...
“In the 1970s, researchers attempted to create rechargeable fluoride batteries using solid components, but solid-state batteries work only at high temperatures, making them impractical for everyday use.”
How Does a Lithium-ion Battery Work?
www.energy.gov...
“While the battery is discharging and providing an electric current, the anode releases lithium ions to the cathode, generating a flow of electrons from one side to the other. When plugging in the device, the opposite happens: Lithium ions are released by the cathode and received by the anode.”
____________________
Elements is more than just a science show. It’s your science-loving best friend, tasked with keeping you updated and interested on all the compelling, innovative and groundbreaking science happening all around us. Join our passionate hosts as they help break down and present fascinating science, from quarks to quantum theory and beyond.
Seeker explains every aspect of our world through a lens of science, inspiring a new generation of curious minds who want to know how today’s discoveries in science, math, engineering and technology are impacting our lives, and shaping our future. Our stories parse meaning from the noise in a world of rapidly changing information.
Visit the Seeker website www.seeker.com...
Elements on Facebook / seekerelements
Subscribe now! www.youtube.com...
Seeker on Twitter / seeker
Seeker on Facebook / seekermedia
Seeker www.seeker.com/
I have seen dozens of headlines like this over the years talking about the next "revolutionary" battery tech. Yet i never hear any followups.
Instead of continuing to push new sensationalized videos, why not do followups or surveys of all those technologies to see where they are and what happened to them.
N3dR solid state is apparently round the corner
Yeah same. Countless of amazing breakthroughs in all kinds of adventurous ways. Super high energy density batteries. Super fast charging ones. Super durable ones. Super environmentally friendly, Super Capacitors, Capacitor-Battery Hybrids,...
For years now. And indeed in dozens and dozens of variants.
And barely any of them I ever heard anything again after that initial news.
At this point what we really need (aside from at least one of those technologies actually finally taking off for once) is a summary series, deep-diving into each of these, comparing their feasibility, and finding existing followups on what steps those various concepts are stuck at or why they got dismissed or why the heck we never ever hear of them again.
You're right that these types of discoveries should be taken with a grain of salt. Long story short there's a large disconnect between the scientific method and the media, and the media will highlight exciting claims, without asking the important questions such as where it's been published.
If you want a more detailed explanation you could watch this:
ua-cam.com/video/LIlBsfTx3Kc/v-deo.html
The guy in the vid is a geologist who now works as a journalist.
A grain of Copper Fluoride amirite
@@Kram1032 some of those technologies are already in newer phones. It's just that for example with graphene it's too costly right now to put so much of it into the batteries that you could just plug it in and have it charged in 5 minutes. Instead the charging time is reduced by 5 minutes or something and the battery stays cooler, increasing efficiency and lifespan.
And battery technology in general is improving really fast lately, even without those new battery types. The latest Oppo Vooc charge can fill your phone with 50W from 0 to 100% in something like half an hour. Qualcomm quick charge 5. Tesla superchargers. The list of super fast charging tech goes on. And all the while energy density increases.
Those super leaps in the form of new battery types take time to develop (that's where the news is) and then a lot of time to make profitable and consumer ready (that's what you almost never hear about because it's industry secrets in big parts). And then some time for it to make it into the final products.
I'm really impatient for a lot of this stuff myself but the process of getting a new technology out just isn't as fast as one would wish
FYI: there's already solid state batteries one can buy right now. For example flexible ones that you can't get to burn. Great Scott made a video about them, look it up
Your phone will still last a day with these batteries. They'll just make it thinner and thinner.
well my phone lasts 3 months so far and if these batteries are better i could probably last a year with it
Also, people are going to want more demanding shit to go with it
@@crackedemerald4930 This. As the capacity increases, the usage of it will go up as well.
this is actually making me feel a bit sick
i just want my 3315 that i dont have to charge constantly
the amount of time i spend unplugging/plugging my phone in is probably ridicolous
and more demanding apps
Press "X" to doubt.
Edit: So before people get confused: I am not doubting that fluoride batteries will work, but rather doubting that it will be able to keep my phone charged (while using it) for 8 times longer. 8 times the energy density of lithium from any chemical device is an absolutely absurd claim. if it were claiming to be only 10% better I would find that much more believable.
X
Dunno why you guys are so pessimistic; my phone battery already lasts a week.
@@vacuumtube8933 how often do you use it tho?
x
X
There was same hype about graphene batteries, guess it'll take a lot of time to reach consumer level.
They can combine the 2
Probably we all be dead by that time 😅
graphene isnt even commercially ready for real industry & tech & only a decade old, vs FL which is a chemical in wide use for a century
To be more accurate, graphene has a potential use as an electrode in batteries, because it has extremely high surface to volume ratio. It is already being used in experimental super-capacitors with much success.
Don't worry graphene batteries will arrive any day now, they just require one tiny step, that being the production plants start receiving energy via fusion reactors. So exciting to get this new battery tech in the just a tiny little while.
Glass based batteries
Solid state lithium batteries
Graphene batteries
Now fluoride battery
So many battery types,yet nothing on consumer market yet.
Seeker guys,pls make a followup of those previous revolutionary battery techs instead of new ones
Thanks
agree
There was a video on glass based batteries?
Generate views tho
@@Mica_T there was some,the scientists who developed lithium based batteries (Dr.Goodenough and Dr.Bragah)started to research on some glass based batteries, not on seeker,but on some other youtube channel
To be fair, there have been advancements using some of the things they've been hyping. Graphene, for example, has already been added into some batteries to improve their life and performance. Unfortunately, graphene is still too expensive to make an entire battery out of, so we wait. A consumer grade, relatively affordable, graphene battery is more worthy of a followup than an upgrade to existing tech using the material. Beyond that, certain improvements are simply going to be industry secrets until we reach the next big leap to a new type of battery (in this example, a graphene battery). That's life, unfortunately.
*_Dentists have left the chat_*
?????????
😭😭😭
@@SrmthfgRockLee Fluoride is needed in body in less quantities in water, toothpastes (tooth decay something), etc
but Fl in high quantities will weaken bone mass, yellow teeth ( its cheese mama) , etc effects
Raw nah hitler used fluoride in his tap water, their fore your saying he cared for his prison camps tooth health? And also why would are government care about tooth decay too?? It’s just to kill us off.
@@SrmthfgRockLee flouride is from toothpastes haha
We already have batteries that last a week.
Its called nokia batteries
(Why are people liking this its such a bad joke)
Ah ha ha
Nokia 3310 has a small 1200mAh battery, but they don't consume jack shit.
@@digojez I know he wasn't being serious, but still it's fun to know the capacity of older phones.
Lol. .bad jokes r trending nowadays
Dad jokes, the worse, the better.... i salut you sir!
Finally, an end to phone cavities.
lol who needs a phone when u got a pc phones are pretty useless they're for calls only i recharge mine once in 3m onths
@@SrmthfgRockLee you idiot
SrmthfgRockLee
This is a great example of what happens when you don’t know what a smartphone is or what you can do with it.
Lol. Wah wahh waahhhhhhh. Sorry bro, that one just didn’t land lmao. Close though, it had potential. Something about it was just too... obvious, or child-like. Props for giving it a shot though man, I got a good laugh out of it anyway lol.
What the heck is a phone cavity? Is that a commonly known thing?
This battery that battery, none of these batteries have hit the consumer market.
OLED technology was invented in the 80's and its just now becoming a thing, you need to be patient dude
It's not just being able to make them, it's about making them feasible for use practically and economically
False. Lithium ion did. So did Nickel metal hydride and Nickel cadmium. Those all took years after first announced.
Manuel Garcia I don't want to wait half of my life for this. This is just pure sensationalism. Done for views. Easy money for these "journalists".
True
We will all be dead before these hit stores.
Those aliens from space be raping us by then..... Oh wait, they been doing that shit without our knowledge.
We are already dead mate.
I'm already dead do...
@@earlaweese
use your fucking brain. we are capable of so much more but the public does not have access to advanced technology. get ready for the false flag.
Not into healthy living, huh?
My phone lasts about 4 hours because I have a serious addiction to streaming high def porn for hours straight. Fix that problem, Seeker.
You are sick
@Trump The Nun I do but 4 hours of porn that's too much
@@flashking107 U expect us to believe that with ur profile picture and video contents?
@@sohanturtorial3856 I use it to hide my identity and I like what I like
@@flashking107 It was a joke
In this week's episode of "battery tech that gets announced, has some hype, then we never hear about again due to it being too hard to scale up",
And yes this happens weekly
your point? it's all still relevant. technology doesn't just improve magically like some people like you assume
Yes, that's why you will never understand the spirit of research.
Videos about new kind of batteries are like the ones about aliens and Elon Musk's businesses. It's very attractive but everytime you click you realize you'll never get to see it or try it before years, if ever at all 😂
(No offense Seeker, I love you, keep doing a great job ❤
Elon Musks Businesses and Aliens are not a fair comparison, are they?
I mean...his rockets are flying and his cars are driving around if I'm not mistaken.
Didn't Elon reveal his boring company tunnel today?
Pretty bad equivalence there.
More like aliens and fusion videos
@@ryavix
That still distinguisches them from Aliens, doesn't it?
Also...aren't they about 50k?
@@ryavix they are 35k lol
early bird gets fluoride poisoning
Enjoy your cavities
fun fact fluoride tends to only be a problem when in quantities of 2-10 parts per million where as the 0.6-1.1 that's say in tap water works wonders for population wide teeth decay rates with NO association to all said adverse effects
Axis .......yes just take a bit of the neurotoxin it's not like it builds up inside you. You can feel it.
@@RBuckminsterFuller Dental Fluorosis and mottling of teeth. It causes cavities.
@@mushman6045 Actually fluoride doesn't stay in the body.
It's water-soluble so therefore it's excreted as normal waste.
fat-soluble substances stay in your body and can build up, like plastic, which is why plastic being introduced into the food-chain is really bad, because it eventually finds it's way to us.
neato!
God bless hahaha
Jesus is literally everywhere..
My Lord My Savior
I'd go gay for Jesus
0:24 *"Okay, before you yell at me in the comments ..."*
UA-cam commenters: *_"REEEEEEEE!"_*
so accurate i dieded
@@necrisro that is EXTREMELY offensive rhetoric to everyone in the quiescent inanimate crowd. please apologize immediately
What does 'REEE' actually mean?
wat
@@nadeemshaikh7863 www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=reeee
Science is slow. Everything takes time.
FCC approval needed, but FCC can be bought by oil and gas companies.
@Grenherb no actually most of the shit you just spouted isnt true oil company arent affected by fucking batterys ahahaha
Progress waits for no one. Not even science.
Science is slow, so many of these videos are premature.
That is because 90% of it is based on theory...
They finally found a better place to dump their fluoride rather than in toothpaste and drinking water. Lol.
DannyLitAF why do they want to do that tho it’s literally what hitler did in prison camps
I prefer Fluoride in my batteries and not in my water 😁
watch,... someday, there'll be a protest because they stop putting fluoride in the water, due to the demand for batteries ...
Yes p/t stuber, Everyone can tell quite easily that you do not use floride.
You do realize that one drop of 50% HF acid can kill you right? It'll be so cool to see people's skin turn green when these batteries catch fire, and watch the people fall over and die!
Samsung already develope a battery called Graphine battery that is already better than this search it up.
Maybe they’ll stop poisoning water now that they found a good use for fluoride.
Too true
@@jamesleverett6911 oh look, someone who knows nothing about fluoride but will agree completely that its bad because a Facebook post said so.
@@miguellopez3392 well I don't have Facebook so get your facts right before u try to correct me
"The human body generates more bio-electricity than a 120-volt battery..." - who needs these artificial batteries anyways 🔋
SO THAT'S WHY THEY PUT IT IN OUR WATER!!!???
I DONT LIKE THEM USING CHEMICALS THAT ARE TURNING THE FREAKING BATTERIES GAY
Lol
WHY ARE WE USING CAPS
@@meekhailr SO ITS HARDER FOR THE GLOBALISTS TO COVER IT UP
WHY ARE YOU ALL SHOUTING
You guys can't be serious with this content....... Instead of bringing yet another battery tech that will undoubtedly change the world......any day now, how about a feature that explains why bringing most new battery tech is incredibly difficult.
Looking at it from a manufacturers point of view. There are dozens of alternative approaches to "new and improved" batteries and energy storage devices....... and just as many problems.
No company wants to invest in what might turn out to be the "Beta Tape" of batteries. No single company wants to take the risk of being 1st with anything that requires a large investment to their existing manufacturing process. This is why, in spite of the different approaches that have been around for decades, small advances to existing tech will always be far more appealing to the manufacturer. No company wants to sow the seeds of it's own destruction by creating batteries (D, AA, AAA), that only need replacement every few years instead of replacing them every few months. Batteries for things like cells and laptops would past the cost on to the consumer but would still be an added expense to the overall price. Another words shooting yourself in the foot by creating a technology that renders any investment worthless is never a good business model. Ironically the large number of alternatives being researched is one of the biggest problems. Outside of custom batteries for things like cells there will need to a consensus of the standards by the manufactures. VHS vs. BETA all over again.
Forgive me for not being that excited. Only in the last two years I've read about 10 or so "breakthroughs" in batteries and nothing was heard about them since then. There is a very big difference between succeeding in lab tests and creating a viable product. A battery needs to be viable economically to manufacture and it must be safe to transport and use. Plus it also needs to be efficient when charging/discharging. Even if fluoride or graphite or any other of these "breakthroughs" prove to be an economical success we are still looking at 10-20 years before we can buy any. That is a long time to be excited about...
They say it's a breakthrough in the study they are researching. Which means that they've made a "breakthrough" in the study and not in the field of commercially available batteries. That's why these "breakthroughs" are important, not in the economic or commercial field, but in the field of the research of the particular battery which helps further development and finally the kind of batteries, as you stated in your comment, which are economically and commercially viable.
@@Guywhomakesthings don't get me wrong. I'm very happy to see how much interest this domain is receiving in the last years. The more the merrier since it's bound for something good to come out from this race of obtaining a better battery. My problem was the way they present this. Like OMG next Christmas you will be getting a fluoride battery as present. A breakthrough in science that can't be used in bettering our day to day lives is not really something to be excited about and chances are that this breakthrough will fail to go further like many other.
@@primusro ahhh.... Ok :) This comment makes the previous one more clear.
Litium ion are damn new lol shut up
@@Guywhomakesthings No need to act that way. He has a point.
This won't replace lithium ion, even if they get it to work swimmingly well. The reason? Lanthanum is $64 a gram. Cobalt is $0.05 a gram. If their electrolyte requires lanthanum, the only people who would be motivated to buy such eye-wateringly expensive batteries would be people launching stuff to space.... Like the NASA scientists working on these!
Science isn't slow, its that capitalism does whatever is in it's best interest in terms of profit, R&D might be an investment several companies don't feel warrant action :/
R&D is always a good investment to get a leg up.
Benschachar tech is moving so fast some companies wait until another company designs it and then does the same, it’s shameful and exactly what apple has been doing for a few years
Ethan Steel that’s not what I’m talking about, I’m saying companies put profit over innovation, the only large company that doesn’t is Tesla, the cars should be much more expensive then they are now, but they just want people to move on to an electric car
Ethan Steel profit is there secondary priority, that’s why their stock is all over the place, companies like space x are also less interested in profit and more with the idea of discovery. I get that companies need to make money to thrive, but you can’t deny that most don’t give a shit about anything other than money.
Ethan Steel that’s where the problem stands, the government promotes profit and regulating it leads to less profit. Take apple for example, they have outsourced the assembly of their devices to where child labor isn’t seen as a problem, we all pretend it doesn’t happen but it does, and they do it because it saves the money. I have never heard of the government attempting to regulate apples means of manufacturing.
I remember when lithium batteries were still not commercially available because they were supposed to be too dangerous for consumer products. I saw it in a science tv show, I've seen many discoveries actually come to consumer products, for example OLED screens, CD burners, flash memory, 3D Printers... that's why I have faith in all these discoveries.
"My phone only lasts for one day and I need more!"
Me: *CRINGE*
Random Stuff go home kid it’s past your curfew
@@sedeanimugamez5418 why so aggressive? I only pulled a joke.
What annoys me the most is that in less then two years, lithium ion batteries are no good anymore. LiFePo4 is good in that regard (besides being safer, specially in hot environments), but they don't have as much energy density as other types of li-ion. :/
We need to pressure gadget makers to give us longer lasting batteries not in the sense of energy density, but in the sense that our gadgets don't become useless in less then two years.
I just saw the title, how much is it
Just of your life until these reach the consumer.
Silly rabbit:
Your phone battery only lasts for one day because people are obsessed with super thin devices, your phone could last days on a charge if you had a 1/2 inch thick battery. They even sell phone case batteries which do just that.
But other than your silly initial statement you are right the energy per size has not increased on the same pace as computing power. there does need to be a leap in battery technology if we are to truly miniaturize electronics further, not give the illusion of thinness.
Wow! Great video...really well written and explained. One of my favorite Seeker videos so far!!
More capacity= more time in use. Now a drone will be able to fly for a day than a 30min fly or a electric car and go more than 1000 miles in a single charge . Just gotta wait until I die when these comes out
She's so Geeky Gorgeous 😍
Mk well it's been a year and it's not on Amazon sooo.. what's the problem? Maybe we should raid battery testing facilities instead of area 51.
Seeker never announce good news. It’s always years away. It’s the sort of a useless crap I talk about in the pub.
Hey got this new battery..... but you can’t use it.... or buy it....... until 50 years...... then it’s too expensive to buy..... then seeker come up with more technology which is 50 years away.
they're geared toward science. if you want consumer products, there are places for that type of news..
You can’t just assume using fluoride with less material to be stable.. every element needs to be stable. Using less to get more would be Which craft. Lol
The presenter has way more room to improve, but thank her and seeker for great contents.
She did a great job.
idigmusictoo for example she is showing lots of passion for a cathode and an anode.
@@masoudhosseini9204 so? lmaooo she's getting excited at science that's great dude the heck?
Axis getting excited about science is cool, I’m excited about progress in energy storage too. But look at other presenters of this channel, they do their work a little more professionally.
Agreed. I think she'll get the hang of it over time. Most of them do. Unfortunately most of them end up pushing their politics into completely unrelated topics as well. Hopefully she doesn't do that.
I 've never noticed that the evolution of batteries are a complexes factor and are in stock for a 5th generation say good by to 4g
Thunderf00t has left the chat
Want it to last more than week, pay more, yes you'll still have to pay for extra.
There are batteries that will last lifetimes but they will not release this tech due to GREED...
There are 4 or 5 new battery technology. How about a video comparing them.
Seeker the least factual factual news source
Get an oukitel smartphone and your problem is solved
Elon musk doesn't believe in things taking alot of time
*Petition for Seeker to stop making clickbait videos*
Screw our phones, get these things into electric vehicles.
F🅱️ck phones, this means electric aircraft would be practical, because the energy density of lithium wasn’t enough to make more than a powered glider. Or even electric cars that can be lighter or road trip ready. Maybe even Elon’s vision of replacing semis with his electric haulers.
Seeker has hyped up supposedly revolutionary batteries before. I'll believe it when I see it.
Sooooooo....
Where can I buy a battery like that?
10 times more energy, 10 times more explosive.
Who wouldn't love to have that.
Nokia was doing this over 15 years ago
Can we use graphene as electrode for fluoride batteries,just asking?
I will just take my lithium ion battery, add a little fluoride toothpaste inside and I should be able to get a slightly longer lasting battery. 🤷🏻♂️
Who else thinks she looks like markiplier?
BATTERIES CAN'T LAST A WEEK BECAUSE THE MORE BETTER BATTERY COMPANY PUT, THE MORE MEMORY HOGGING APPLICATIONS IN DIFFERENT VERSIONS WILL SUCK IT OUT.
Hey guys can u help me get top comment?
How about mixing the fluoride in a carbon nanotube set up?
Or mixing the fluoride with metastable materials?
If they come up with batteries that last a week, OEMs will slim down their phones and still provide only a day's worth of battery in them and "innovate" few minutes of SOT increments over following decades.
Cars
*Elon Musk wants to know your location*
Love the science updates. Am I the only one who thinks her intelligence makes her smoking Hot?
I'm gonna stock up on my toothpaste now
Where did that graphene shit go?
Great video, I really enjoyed the content! Please continue to make quality content like this, I can only dream to become as big as you one day and spread positivity! Love from a small UA-camr...
Those are the useful scientists
Seekers should add subtitles in there videos
"A phone battery that lasts a week"
I've had my phone for several years now and the battery still works!
Who put toothpaste in my battery!
Sounds like this new liquid electrolyte is highly chorosive...
Why don't just make batteries that can be charged super fast, like 0 to 100 in less than 5 minutes. That'll do it for me.
Saitama Senpai we can do something that can charge in 1 quarter of a second but nobody cares to fund science 🙃
Look at me I'm so silly!
I am excited for an iPhone battery that can last one week.
Higher energy density is nice and all, but the improvement I want to see over Li-on is lifespan. I want a rechargeable battery that doesn’t die after a few years.
Imagine how useful that would be for autonomous space exploration.
So toothpaste batteries?
Your deliverance is very good. You may speak fast but I can easily understand every thing you say; make more videos.
Just so you will appreciate where I am coming from go to the video on 'super fluids' and try to follow her super fast , mono tone discourse--- I couldn't. So good luck.
What if the future is not smaller batteries but smaller generators?
This is what I need fluoride battery I can fly drone hours and months of single charge!😎👍👈
for that wait until production rate for fuel cells increase, cost drop and you will be able to fly your drone many hours, nothing beats hydrogen in energy by weight.
What's next? Calcium, potassium, iron batteries? Every single mineral in our bodies will be in a batteries soon, I tell ya people.
Science is NOT slow, consumers are just impatient. Think about all that we’ve learned in just a blip of time in the cosmic calendar.
I think they refer to this room temp test and looks very bad not even as good as LiFePO4 in therms of energy density maybe half that science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/362/6419/1144/F3.large.jpg
How bout a follow up video cuz u never talk about it or any updates about ur videos after they posted. Stop going into a new topic and try to stick with one a little longer.
Like if you agree!
they set it to Wumbo
*Scientists at NASA, Caltech and Honda
It Rhymes...
Oh, I already know about this one! It's made by toothpaste.
wait so your telling me , I could simply increase my phone's battery life to about a whole week in 4 easy steps.If you want to know what those steps are here they are:
STEP 1: Open your phone case
STEP 2: Get your toothpaste and squirt it all over the back of your phone/on the battery
STEP 3: wham that cover back on
STEP 4: Enjoy a whole week of battery life.
Hope these instructions help, and you're welcome
Replies that expect this to be only incrementally better than Li-ion are incredibly annoying. Fundamentally altered battery chemistry really does work that way. There's first a big jump, then an iterative improvement closer to theoretical values. This kind of statement is like comparing Li-ion (old-state of the art of ~150-250 W·h/g with Pb-acid ~20-50 W·h/g) and saying we would only expect a 10% improvement. It's a >5x improvement in real systems at all points. A small improvement isn't expected, or nobody would bother trying to beat a commoditized solution like Li-ion. Also, we already have ballpark double the energy density of Li-ion in lithium-sulfur batteries, they're just too expensive (~100% of the market is aerospace because they're willing to pay 10x for the same capacity if it's half the mass), and this and silicon anode tech are really the technologies that fluoride batteries are trying to be a step-change above.
Hey Seeker! Don't be so excited about anything made out of Fluoride, the big problem: "recyclability!" (And toxicity to humans/carcinogen).
Best idea so far would be Sodium ion based batteries. First, Sodium is abundant thus cheaper. Second, extracting it from say Sea Water, is less energy intensive. Third, recycling it is much more straightforward. And fourth but most important, byproducts of both exploitation of raw materials and disposalof used batteries creates, on the first purified drinking water, and on the second non toxic materials.
See: Tiamat batteries in France, and BroadBit batteries in Finland.
Get excited and make a video about those!
Still can't beat Nokia!🤖
For all the people who thought.. That's sounds to good to be true...
You are right.. This ist bullshit nothing more.
Here are three quotes from the paper
"Fluoride ion batteries: Theoretical performance, safety, toxicity, and a combinatorial screening of new electrodes"
1)
It can be said that, all tested combinations remain far away from the predicted values. The OCV were generally too low, along with a deep voltage in the discharge plateau affording those poor discharge capacities.
Furthermore no combination showed any cycling capacity. This is due to the formation of a passivation layer (MFx) on the anode side, which prevents cycling (supporting material). Therefore only the first discharge was investigated for the first tests.
2)None of the tested combination came any close to the theoretical values. Especially the low discharge plateaus would be a serious problem for a potential application.
3)
in future the most important focus has to be laid on reaching higher OCV and discharge plateau as on finding an anode-cathode system, which allows cycling. Only than the theoretically interesting RT-FIB systems, could truly be discussed as an alternative to current commercial battery
I’ll just add it to the list of -
Japan’s Carbon/Carbon Batterie,
Goodenough - glass battery,
The next lithium battery - lithium- air,
Samsung - Graphene battery,
Im still waiting on my graphite battery 👀👀👀
We make jokes and decisions on how long someone’s battery lasts like “Ha! Your phone only lasts 22 hours while mine last 23 hours!” Next we’re going to be like! “The iPhone XXXI suck so bad, their batteries only lasts 364 days a year! While my Samsung S100 lasts me a full 365 days a year!” 😂😂😂
Who in the hell are you?
2 issues.
1. Much higher energy density = greater potential for danger (fire).
2. What is the durability? If these batteries don't decay quickly (two years maximum lifespan) no companies will put them in devices. As it stands, with normal use, most batteries will not allow more than 1000 charges, most fast charging batteries take that down to between 200 and 400 charges. This is a huge selling point for manufacturers like Apple who want you to purchase new products yearly.
If I had a dollar for every Dnews/Seeker video announcing a revolutionary new battery tech...well, I could probably buy a pizza or something, but that's not the point. While I love new tech and science, so please don't stop making these kind of videos, I would also like to see some follow up videos. Let's see what happens with these revolutionary ideas over the years. Do they stop short of their promises? Are they bought out by larger companies? Are they bought and never heard of again? Or are they actually starting to be used in any commercial applications? If so the case, is their introduction on the market having any (potential) positive impact on reducing pollution? Will they ever see wide spread use or they only fit some obscure applications? Talk directly to those developing the tech. Let's hear what they have to say.
Just my 2 cents :)
Also, if batteries could last up to 8 days, manufacturer would pack their devices so full of shit looking good in advertising, that the batteries would only last a day anyway. Phones would get projectors, fans, active cooling, cigarette lighters, 40 cameras, smell detectors, and have 360-screens that are always on to make the phones shifting color on demand. Anything that's flashy, nothing that is demanded.
So your saying I could power my PC with a gtx 1060 6gb + I5 8400 with 3 RGB fans, 1 1tb hdd, 1 m.2 ssd, and monitor, keyboard, and mouse off of a UPS and get more than a few hours? YEET wait...
*presses X to doubt
Lithium ion batteries were all talk in the 1970/80's until they finally became widely commercially available in the 1990/2000's.
Long time to wait is because of prototyping, testing, refining, more testing and building facilities to manufacture said products and then the product is further refined over the years until it's replaced by better tech.
Hmmmm let's see, lithium ion batteries are prone to exploding/catching on fire when the output and charging is not well regulated (see fire hoverboards). So at 8x energy that fire would have 8x the power to be fueled. If you stab a AA battery(alkaline) it gets hot and maybe catches on fire if you're lucky, if you stab a lithium battery you will get more heat and more likely a fire(energy density). So what would happen with fluoride?