Ya, it's very accurate even in FA'AA in Papeete. (Hint: pronounce each vowel) Last year was my 2nd time in French Polynesia. We also arrived at Gate 221. I have a pic but cannot upload it.
I really like the details in the external model - it looks much more realistic compared to the default and other projects derived from it. That being said, due the fuselage really have all those edges and panels? Isn't the whole deal with the 787 that the fuselage is made from large pieces of composite materials such that it is more smooth and has less drag?
Well, apparently not detailed enough. Especially the leading edge slats. Completely wrong and unrealistic. The slats are a mess. The tiny Krueger flaps near the engine pylon are missing on both wings, the actual slats are too short and look like they are stuck/ barely come out during extension. It's completely wrong. They should curved down, not barely extended forward like that when Flaps are being used. Try comparing it to Quality Wing 787 on P3D. They have very realistic and the best slats model, if you compare with the real life 787 wing view videos. (If you don't look at the graphic itself, just modelling) and they actually have the tiny Krueger flaps. Which is unique to Boeing planes like 767, 777, 787. As a wing view enthusiast, it's a huge deal for me.
You are right. This is procedure. However this is only done for commonality in procedures with the B777. Boeing sold the 787 with the pre-text that the types can be flown in one airline-division by the same pilots. The B777 has this procedure to prevent Hydraulic Fluid transfer, while the 787 has electric brakes. Nevertheless… you caught it! Very observant 👍🏻
Is this new 787 based on the original 787 like Captainsim did with the 777 (Basing it off the 747), or is it a completly new build and new systems (Like Fenix & PMDG) TIA
@@pulse_ Thanks for such a swift reply - Thats dissapointing, but hopefully we'll get a completly new dreamliner at some point in the future. I think Quality wings were working on the 787 family but havn't heard anything from them for more than a year.
@@Alex-nm9xs tbh I don’t think getting the qw would be much of a benefit, this is already a great aircraft that just needs a little bit more system depth
Oh boi...that Landing and touch down behaviour... slamming down as fast as a C172. Why is the flight model in MSFS so scary and ground physics are broken?
As someone who flies airliners on Xplane, MSFS flight characteristics still scare me. Above all flaring, touching town and steering. hope it will be improved and more smooth so a heavy aircraft really feels like a big bird. Air to ground transition still seems to be a big issue for the sim @@pulse_
I think the main gear touchdown itself is well animated, but you’re right, the MSFS ground physics look broken, there is zero to no gear compression, especially in the replay, the nose gear touchdown looks really weird. Hopefully MSFS/Horizon sim can make the gear actually compress into the aircraft under braking load with the SPLRs and autobrakes in use. That would be cool to see.
You actually make good videos, but...I wrote to you about this before, I believe. The quality of a good graphics card is one thing, but the quality of the producer is even more important. Ever heard of it: "Avoid the obvious" It's totally disturbing, this constant talk about you, about what you're seeing. People who watch your videos here aren't idiots who need to be told what they see, and people who don't know anything about the industry won't be in the majority either. Don't do that, it would improve your videos enormously.
You're talking about what you're doing in the simulation...and that's exactly the problem! We all see what you're doing and that's exactly the "avoid the obvious" thing. You are welcome to leave a comment if something is not entirely clear and unambiguous, but please not permanently. It gets annoying over time. It's a total shame about the otherwise great videos.
I’ve been practicing in the default 78X and finding it difficult to land it smoothly. I suspect I’m over flaring. Looking at this landing there appeared to be hardly any flare but looks smooth as 🧈🫡👏. What’s the best way to improve?
The build I used in this video does not have the most updated flight model but it will continue to get better. It is way better than the default flight model
I work on this flight in real life. The parking gate is pretty accurate, usually goes to 221 or 225 at the Bradley west satellite terminals
Pretty cool!
Ya, it's very accurate even in FA'AA in Papeete. (Hint: pronounce each vowel) Last year was my 2nd time in French Polynesia. We also arrived at Gate 221. I have a pic but cannot upload it.
Love this video. Subscribed. Can’t wait for the -9
Truly beautiful video 🔥🔥
Very Nice video! Super stoked to try out the new dash 9!
Great video!!!!!!!!! Thanks for sharing.
Can't wait to take it to the skies this friday!
Is that when it's coming out
@@G-TTNA27.10
I really like the details in the external model - it looks much more realistic compared to the default and other projects derived from it. That being said, due the fuselage really have all those edges and panels? Isn't the whole deal with the 787 that the fuselage is made from large pieces of composite materials such that it is more smooth and has less drag?
From what I’ve seen in real life it is pretty accurate
Will this be on series x as well
@@chuck176 No pc only
Well, apparently not detailed enough. Especially the leading edge slats. Completely wrong and unrealistic.
The slats are a mess.
The tiny Krueger flaps near the engine pylon are missing on both wings, the actual slats are too short and look like they are stuck/ barely come out during extension. It's completely wrong. They should curved down, not barely extended forward like that when Flaps are being used.
Try comparing it to Quality Wing 787 on P3D. They have very realistic and the best slats model, if you compare with the real life 787 wing view videos. (If you don't look at the graphic itself, just modelling) and they actually have the tiny Krueger flaps. Which is unique to Boeing planes like 767, 777, 787.
As a wing view enthusiast, it's a huge deal for me.
Magnifique vidéo . Très intéressant , car c'est ce même avion que j'ai eu pour mon retour de polynésie au mois de Mai dernier.
Nice video bro, I want to ask whats your favourite payware airport
Probably OGG Kahului, HI
superb mister 🤩🤩🤩
Fantastic video, really enjoyed it. But how did you get the ftsim sounds into this airplane, I cant figure out how to do that.
Damm, fool, them slats was glowing. I think the fuselage should be just a little lengthened.
Beautiful video!
03:00 For the hydraulic you must put the right one first and then the others turn all the hydraulic. And for the hydraulic is for before start.
You are right. This is procedure. However this is only done for commonality in procedures with the B777. Boeing sold the 787 with the pre-text that the types can be flown in one airline-division by the same pilots. The B777 has this procedure to prevent Hydraulic Fluid transfer, while the 787 has electric brakes.
Nevertheless… you caught it! Very observant 👍🏻
Those graphics look breath-taking! What is your nvidia freestyle settings?
I use reshade
@@pulse_ what presets do you use?
@@giantaxe3958 they are on my community page
@@pulse_ thanks
You should definitely do a qantas flight in this aircraft
Coming soon, a very very long one😉
Are there any cockpit textures you use for the 787-9 because they look pretty clean, they look different compare to mine
They are dirty textures that come with the -9 and -8 aircraft
What camera mod do you use?
nice video! But can someone tell me, is it editing or actual a kind of addon with the realistic camera movment and the field of depth here?
It is a mix of reshade and track ir for head movement
😍😍Amazing!
Nice vid
love it
what is your addon that adds cabin ambiance (safety instructions, etc.)?
Taken from youtube videos/FSRealistic and GSX Pro
Nice video, do you have any problems with DX12 texture bleed through?
Yes a lot, very hard to record at some airports
Same problem here, i bought a 4090 so i can use frame
gen but on DX12 almost all airports give me that bug@@pulse_
what bitrate do u record in and also how do u get that blur it looks so good
I can't remember off the top of my head but I believe its 5000, and to get the blur I use reshade.
Nice video! 👍 Did you use the add-on for background radio chatter? If so, what is this addon?
I used liveatc recordings
@@pulse_ Ok, thank you!
Is the FTsim sound pack you are using compatible directly? Did you use the one for the -10? Cheers
No it is not currently directly compatible, I figured out how to install the one used for the -8
@@pulse_ cool, thanks!
sweet
11:35 what software did you use to get the takeoff video of the entire aircraft?
FlightControlReplay
How do you get your shadows so sharp?
You have to go into the userCFG.opt file inside the game files and change shadows maxslicecount 4 size to 8192 or 4096
Great video! May I ask you how do you record the outside view before landing? Pretty cool effect!
Flight control replay and drone mode
friend just remember to start your turns at 400AGL or higher.. Other than that looks very real i just subscribed to your channel
What are you using to control your head movement or panning around the flight deck?
track ir
Hi cpt amazing video Which sound pack are you using and how to put it in the 787-9 when he will release
The FTSim sound pack
@@pulse_ and the Ftsim sound pack will be include in the aircraft ?
@@hd_thomas7775 No, FTSim has to release a version of the soundpack to go into the -9 variant
@@pulse_ok but how do you have access to it now
@@hd_thomas7775 I figured out a way to install the pack myself
I see that you’re on RTX 4080 and 11th gen i7. I wonder what settings do you have to prevent stutters?
Frame generation relies solely on the the GPU and not the CPU
what flight recorder do you use?
If you are referring to replay, I use flight control replay, to record videos I use nvidia shadowplay
how much will it cost and will it have a functional efb?
Do you use eye tracking? If yes, witch one?
Track ir
Why did you have a tail strike on departure(came up on EICAS recall), I didn't see the tail hit the runway.
Small glitch
do you have a tutorial on how to replicate that sick cruise cinematic?
I do not. It’s pretty simple though, just lower the drone speed settings and pan the camera around
niceeeee
What scenery are you using for NTAA? That one does not look default.
It is payware, can’t think of the developer off the top of my head
amazing graphics whats ur reshade preset
They are on my community page
thanks@@pulse_
Is this new 787 based on the original 787 like Captainsim did with the 777 (Basing it off the 747), or is it a completly new build and new systems (Like Fenix & PMDG) TIA
It is using the asobo systems, with a custom exterior model
@@pulse_ Thanks for such a swift reply - Thats dissapointing, but hopefully we'll get a completly new dreamliner at some point in the future. I think Quality wings were working on the 787 family but havn't heard anything from them for more than a year.
@@Alex-nm9xs tbh I don’t think getting the qw would be much of a benefit, this is already a great aircraft that just needs a little bit more system depth
What are your graphics settings?
I use the ultra preset
How do u get those cinematic camera shots like on landing?
Drone camera
Oh boi...that Landing and touch down behaviour... slamming down as fast as a C172. Why is the flight model in MSFS so scary and ground physics are broken?
The flight model used in this video is not the most recent build of the aircraft. The bugs with flaring and all that have now been improved and fixed
As someone who flies airliners on Xplane, MSFS flight characteristics still scare me. Above all flaring, touching town and steering. hope it will be improved and more smooth so a heavy aircraft really feels like a big bird. Air to ground transition still seems to be a big issue for the sim @@pulse_
I think the main gear touchdown itself is well animated, but you’re right, the MSFS ground physics look broken, there is zero to no gear compression, especially in the replay, the nose gear touchdown looks really weird. Hopefully MSFS/Horizon sim can make the gear actually compress into the aircraft under braking load with the SPLRs and autobrakes in use. That would be cool to see.
The landing spoiler is wrong… Same problem as Kuro788
?
How are your graphics so good?!
Just run ultra settings
When you say ultra. Just the Ultra preset in the UI menu or are there any specific settings you fine tune.@@pulse_
what systems are not simulated yet?
I'm not exactly sure, but probably a lot of stuff in the FMC, the vertical situation display on the mfd, and other features in the EFB
all the switches on the overhead panel are simulated?@@pulse_
Are you using DX11 and TAA?
DX12 and TAA
@pulse_ Thanks 😊, and how did you setting to make blur camera, invidia filter?
@@pathompongpavara3747 reshade
@pulse_ did you any setting with Nvidia control panel?
How did you get the air tahiti livery?
It comes with the aircraft
Does this airliner have passenger cabin modeled?
No
You actually make good videos, but...I wrote to you about this before, I believe.
The quality of a good graphics card is one thing, but the quality of the producer is even more important.
Ever heard of it: "Avoid the obvious"
It's totally disturbing, this constant talk about you, about what you're seeing.
People who watch your videos here aren't idiots who need to be told what they see, and people who don't know anything about the industry won't be in the majority either. Don't do that, it would improve your videos enormously.
Are you suggesting that I do not do commentary altogether. I speak to narrate through what I'm doing in the sim.
You're talking about what you're doing in the simulation...and that's exactly the problem!
We all see what you're doing and that's exactly the "avoid the obvious" thing. You are welcome to leave a comment if something is not entirely clear and unambiguous, but please not permanently. It gets annoying over time. It's a total shame about the otherwise great videos.
The wing textures are horrific, wow fsx quality.
Look great to me lol
I’ve been practicing in the default 78X and finding it difficult to land it smoothly. I suspect I’m over flaring. Looking at this landing there appeared to be hardly any flare but looks smooth as 🧈🫡👏. What’s the best way to improve?
The build I used in this video does not have the most updated flight model but it will continue to get better. It is way better than the default flight model
@@pulse_so did you flare very little as it looked in the vid?
@@AndrewSanderson152 yes correct, it was a combo of bad piloting and poor performance at LAX