Full Arch Implant Scanning: Reviewing Shining 3D Aoralscan Elite's Photogrammetry Workflow

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 47

  • @machewbacca
    @machewbacca Місяць тому

    This is impressive, the secret lies in the calibrated dots, I expect to see other companies release similar scanbodies. Nice to see some innovation in dentistry. This scanner paired with the Qlone app make high end digital dentistry affordable for a lot of practices. Will raise the standard of care for all patients.

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  Місяць тому

      I agree. It will be interesting to see what other companies do in response. Cool innovation for sure.

  • @shannondavis4186
    @shannondavis4186 18 днів тому

    Great work once again, Doc! How does the scanner do in a bloody field? How does this workflow relay the post op soft tissue scan to the lab for CAD of the temp? Thanks!

  • @michaelk6957
    @michaelk6957 2 місяці тому +1

    I would love to see this with 8 impants. How would all these huge scan bodies fit with ought touching or overlapping one another?

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  2 місяці тому

      I just did a case with 6 implants today. Worked quite well.

    • @michaelk6957
      @michaelk6957 2 місяці тому

      @@InstituteofDigitalDentistry Ok. I am glad you did. But how about implants that are too close to each other? Or what about cases where you have 7 or 8 implants per jaw. Do these scan bodies fit?
      Its great idea overall but looks a bit impractical with such huge scan bodies.

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  2 місяці тому

      @@michaelk6957 The width of each is about 5mm and fits on the MUA. I don't see it being a massive issue as there are multiple sizes including short, medium and long.
      Similar to trying to fit photogrammetry flags.

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  2 місяці тому

      @@michaelk6957 If implants are very close together you will have an issue placing the icam scan bodies as well. These scan bodies fit as they come in a range of sizes and the most important thing is that they all point towards the centre. I can see your point but with 7 or 8 implants even placing photogrammetry dies either PIC or ICAM is a nuisance.

    • @michaelk6957
      @michaelk6957 2 місяці тому

      @@InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      I have used medit, 3shape, Zirkonzahn, ivoclar, open technologies dental lab scanners. I ended up buying the DS ex Pro scanner from Shining for my lab.
      All i can say is that Shining makes the best scanners from anything i have seen out there. Just wipes the floor in all features.
      speed, accuracy, software, precision, alignment, size and price!
      Great company, great innovations.

  • @paolof-w1n
    @paolof-w1n 2 місяці тому +1

    Having used the Aoraolscan elite, If you had to purchase a current scanner for an all on 4 would you get a separate photogrammetry or the all in one Aoral scan? Do you see any short coming with the Elite compared to Medit or 3Shape in scan quality ? Thank you in advance for all the great efforts and knowledge!

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  2 місяці тому

      This is how I see it. Photogrammetry devices are very costly. If you do a lot of full arch implant work, then it may make sense to get one. You can use any scanner with them, I personally use 3Shape TRIOS 5 + imetric ICAM because I like how T5 scans edentulous. But any scanner can work as long as you find the scanning of full arch bloody sites OK.
      If you do not do a lot of full arch but still need a solution, the Elite is very promising and frankly a very smart move by the company because it is under 20k, and you get a scanner and a way to handle these cases.
      Hope that helps.

    • @doctorneilofficial
      @doctorneilofficial Місяць тому

      @@InstituteofDigitalDentistry if you’re doing 15-20 arches a month, do you think this is still a good option? Or would you prefer the trios 5 + Icam option? Would love to hear your opinion

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  Місяць тому +2

      @@doctorneilofficial Yes but icam I still feel is the gold standard to beat. I have been doing a number of full arch cases, which I will use the Elite to restore, and I will update our website on how it goes. 15-20 arches a month is far above average, so either way could be good for you. With that number, to me, it probably warrants spending the money for icam, but again, it really depends on how well this performs, which is under testing now.

  • @andysmarandescu7452
    @andysmarandescu7452 2 місяці тому +2

    I don't quite get how could these scan bodies cover for different implant systems. How do such a small number of scan bodies fit on so many types of multi unit abutments? I'm starting out on edentuoulus scans so maybe there's something I'm missing. And one more question: Is it a limited number of implant systems that's supported by shining 3d or it has all of the systems in there?

    • @MarcosBorges-ux8ox
      @MarcosBorges-ux8ox 2 місяці тому

      Most MUAs have a compatible platform and use the same screw size for different implant systems. The scan bodies just need to sit properly and stay stable during scanning. I will try to find a compatibility chart and post the link here.

    • @quangcuongvu8684
      @quangcuongvu8684 2 місяці тому

      Yeap - i have the same these questions.

    • @MarcosBorges-ux8ox
      @MarcosBorges-ux8ox 2 місяці тому

      I just found this information on their website: "If the physical connecting interface matches, Shining 3D can add a certain implant scanbody into the software. Possibly many existing implant brands are compatible with existing scanbody kits."
      I guess they need to work a bit on this information as no dentist will buy a photogrammetry device without making sure that it's compatible to the MUAs they use.

    • @GustavoCarvalho-y5c
      @GustavoCarvalho-y5c 2 місяці тому +3

      Hello, I'm Gustavo and I'm an Application Engineer at Shining 3D Dental. We do have 30+ implant systems compatible with our coded scanbodies and I guess I could give you a list if you need. In theory, as Marcos mentioned, we can add any multi unit abutment that shares the same screw we use to the list (will need to confirm screw thread and size if the information is required)

    • @MarcosBorges-ux8ox
      @MarcosBorges-ux8ox 2 місяці тому

      @@GustavoCarvalho-y5c Thanks for the clarification, Gustavo.

  • @ЖеняКравченя
    @ЖеняКравченя 26 днів тому

    Hello. What about bite scanning?
    What is the method?

  • @sergiofaber6961
    @sergiofaber6961 Місяць тому

    How can you register the bite relation in a all on x case. Would love to see a tutorial on that. Great video btw

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  Місяць тому +1

      Either use a previous denture, previous all on x prosthetic (designed prior if they had a normal bite before surgery) or any form of bite registration jig, that can be placed in the mouth to hold the bite at a certain stable VD while also allowing you to scan the buccal aspects.

  • @deepsouthcowfarmer7908
    @deepsouthcowfarmer7908 Місяць тому

    I’m really skeptical that this will give you a “passive” bar/restoration across the arch. I think it will easily give you a model that a sectioned verification jig could be fabricated on then modify the analogs and continue on.

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  Місяць тому +1

      Im finishing up a few cases before making any conclusions. But so far it is looking really promising.
      I think this will disrupt things

  • @FFXI1099
    @FFXI1099 Місяць тому

    Thank you!!!!

  • @mattclar
    @mattclar 2 місяці тому +1

    Interesting to see how it compares to the Nexus workflow

  • @SAZ2027
    @SAZ2027 2 місяці тому

    Excellent information 👍

  • @ciucasg.3522
    @ciucasg.3522 2 місяці тому

    Does the aoralscan 3d shining has it too?

  • @andreasklie1459
    @andreasklie1459 2 місяці тому

    Does this output to Dess scan bodies for the lab.

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  2 місяці тому +2

      Not yet, but I did ask for you and they said they plan to add it soon

    • @andreasklie1459
      @andreasklie1459 2 місяці тому

      @@InstituteofDigitalDentistry thank you, this would be great.

    • @machewbacca
      @machewbacca Місяць тому

      if you have a good lab, they should be able to sort that out for you. I could... :)

  • @kimoanbui9584
    @kimoanbui9584 Місяць тому

    Please let me know, has anyone tried the Aoralscan elite with the C-tech implant, is it suitable?

  • @mattclar
    @mattclar 2 місяці тому +1

    Great price as well

  • @SamA-ho8uj
    @SamA-ho8uj 2 місяці тому +4

    Photogrammetry companies are dead now, unless they release the same techs with IOS included

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  2 місяці тому +3

      This is certainly a big disruption to their business model, it will be interesting to see how they respond.

  • @kimoanbui9584
    @kimoanbui9584 Місяць тому

    Please let me know, has anyone tried the Aoralscan elite with the C-tech implant, is it suitable?

    • @InstituteofDigitalDentistry
      @InstituteofDigitalDentistry  Місяць тому

      Yes, it is. C-tech implant compatible.
      I asked the company for you but for any queries simply ask your Shining3D local rep to confirm