Відео

Lithium disilicate truly strikes a great balance between strength and esthetics, making it a go-to material for many clinicians, including myself. Your mention of resin-based crowns/onlays/inlays is intriguing. A 90%+ survival rate over five years is quite promising, suggesting these materials may carve out their niche in restorative dentistry. It will be fascinating to see how these options evolve and compare to lithium disilicate and zirconia over time. The advancements in CAD/CAM and material science are certainly paving the way for even more durable and esthetic solutions. Any stand out printable resins so far?

@@nickentros agreed. Once the resins are “good enough” their will be a paradigm shift. And we are close i feel.

Hey there, sorry I got mixed up with our Elite review :) I would say this fits between TRIOS 5 and TRIOS 4. If you have the money TRIOS 5 is one of the best scanners but if it does not fit the budget and you want wireless this is a good option.

299 USD / month All info here: instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/ai/second-opinion-by-pearl-ai-assisted-dental-radiography-review/

just get it. its an amazing additional to a practice

@@gurkim7063agreed. Fantastic software.

Everyone has preferences and experiences that shape their opinions. I've heard mixed reviews about all the major brands, too, and no scanner is without its flaws. Shining3D scanners have been steadily improving, and they're definitely positioning themselves as serious contenders. It’s exciting to see how the competition is driving innovation and bringing prices down. The next year or two are going to be game-changing for the scanner market.

@ I couldn’t agree more. I’ve had the original itero which was junk. I had a b/w trios which failed 55% of its tests when they logged in. They gave me a color one which was okay but a staff member dropped it and cracked the lens. I waited over three weeks to get an RMA to send it to Poland. Neither 3shape nor Schein helped. I “traded it in” for a complete piece of s^*t Catestream 3600 which I can’t say enough bad things about. I was blown away that it took a mere TEN MINUTES to set up and use my Medit i500. Once I got an i700 I had to change NOTHING. They both simply worked. The Aoralscan looks to be similarly positioned which is great since the heavy hitters are expensive and not always superior. If i honestly thought they were I’d own one since we use scanners ALL DAY LONG. I look forward to Shining and others to enter the market and disrupt the market.

@@normandknowlesdmd It sounds like you've been through quite the journey with intraoral scanners, and I totally understand your frustration with some of those experiences. The Medit i700 is often praised for its ease of use and reliability, so it's great to hear it worked so seamlessly for you, especially after dealing with so many setbacks. You're right about the Aoralscan - it’s definitely gaining traction as a cost-effective option with solid performance. The competition from companies like Shining3D is exciting, as it keeps the market dynamic and pushes innovation. Here's hoping we continue to see better, more affordable solutions that deliver on their promises, especially for those of us who rely on scanners daily!

Wisdom right there

Do you want something mobile? Get Metismile. Do you want something that's one click operation but will stay in one spot in the clinic? Rayface.

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry thank you, but if cost is part of the decision making, you will go with Metismile? Both workflow comparable?

@@leoyangdds If cost is part of the decision, Metismile is 1/3 or 1/4 of the cost. So that makes a big difference. Both workflows are comparable yes. Personally I use RayFace more in my clinic as I just like one touch operation. But I have associates that love Metismile.

Yes it does. It can be used for bridges.

Yes. But for 3 or 4 unit bridges especially posterior with good scan strategy I just use scan bodies with no issue.

Yes I have tried it for multiple crowns. No concerns. 10+ veneers also no problem. It comes down to the operator and scan strategy.

@ thank you sir Between Aoralscan3 and Runyes V3 which one will you prefer more for FMR case ? 🙏

@@iceaqar Either or. If its dentate. If its full arch implants, aoralscan 3

One is much cheaper than the other. And the other has much more sophisticated software and apps.

Panda is a great price but TRIOS software is exceptional. It is up to you. Try both. If you feel the extra money warrants the TRIOS CORE get that, if not, Panda. We have a full TRIOS CORE review coming out in 1-2 days.

Very much so. Great option.

Tried a few times at conferences. It is OK. The issue is the low-cost market is very competitive. Depends on what price they are quoting? How much is the cost in USD?

@InstituteofDigitalDentistry I'm getting it at a price of around 3,500 USD from a local dealer.

@@abdullahshoaibdar For that price it is fine. Test it on patients. All scanners work. I find for simple crown and bridge all scanners work. But for full arch implants, edentulous scanning, etc cheaper scanners generally do worse. Also the software is nothing close to the mid-tier or premium segment of the market.

@InstituteofDigitalDentistry Oh, okay, thank you!

I have reviews for both coming out this week. The Medit i900 review just posted, and the TRIOS Core review will be on Friday. instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/medit-i900-intraoral-scanner-review-is-this-medits-best-scanner-yet/ Different scanners, different price points. Core is bigger, larger, still great scanning, but old. Medit i900 much newer tech.

You are not wrong, but I found no difference in our scanning with brand-new tips either. These water spots are a nuisance with all scanner tips.

Excellent as well. While Medit sets the bar, Shining3D does quite well.

Medit is indeed excellent which is why I have two of them.

@@normandknowlesdmd Great company. Great scanner.

No. All info here: instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/shining-3d-aoralscan-elite-review-does-intraoral-photogrammetry-really-work/

Not yet, but I expect to later this Q1. Just FYI it is a white-label LAUNCA scanner: www.launcadental.com/launca-dl-300-wireless-intraoral-scanner-product/

Here is some advice - normally cure it first and then quick polish, then candy coat with like 1 min pre cure after painting it on, then glycerin cure for another 1 min, or 2 . Depending on how thick the candy coat layer is. It cannot be too thick , it will trap bubbles. Use the same curing parameter, yellow could be the too long or too much power from the UV light.

best advice is make sure you minimise touching the surface before curing and candycoat etc

Will be published Jan 2025 :)

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry @aristotelasrafael2444 Helios 680 is latest from Eighteeth

You are not wrong, I think we will see the rise of custom abutments for sure.

They have a number of really innovative solutions.

I published it 2 months ago :) instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/dexis-is-3800-wireless-intraoral-scanner-review-2024-update-dtx-studio-clinic/

In my opinion the Panda Smart is far superior to Panda 2.

Thank you! The cost of Midas is $9,995 USD

Thanks for your comment! Just to clarify, there’s no cold here-maybe that’s just how the narrator sounds. Let’s keep it constructive!

Because it is all done within their software. You cannot plug and play any scanner into it.

Both are about the same level. Helios 500 has a slightly better UI and software. Panda is pen size and small.

Within 2 weeks

Keep an eye out here - instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/category/intraoral-scanner-reviews/

What help do you need? It is best to contact your local distributor who sold it to you

Dentsply has moved scanning to the cloud natively. Which is a big move. Next, I expect CAD on the cloud, etc. Medit not sure what their move is going to be. Their recent scanner, the i900, was much the same in terms of cloud, but the company was way ahead of its time with their cloud syncing, etc. I would not be surprised if more companies make devices that can scan directly only the cloud in the future.

TRIOS Core = great scanner still even though its close to a decade old. Showing its age a bit. It is larger, heavier, and slower to heat up than the medit. But is better at scanning edentulous and blood. Medit = more modern, newer, smaller, single cord. Great option for a low cost esp if all you want is for crown and bridge Etc. So both are good in their own way. Try both :)

Thank you. Agreed, it will just keep getting better and better. And those companies without big R&D budgets will likely be left behind

Many scanners are calibration-free these days like TRIOS 5. This is another one hence not needing a calibration tool.

AS260 and all Alliedstar scanners are calibration-free. This is similar to many scanners on the market now. So they don't require calibration and should be fine unless badly damaged.

The best way is to find a local distributor. Or contact the company directly and ask who their distributor is in your region. This would be the ideal support channel. In saying that, most companies these days work very well with a virtual team, and simply providing support online / using remote connectivity software to help you get started.

Short answer no. The connection is very stable just like all other wireless IOS in 2024. These modern scanners are great and totally different to the ones from 5 years ago

Thanks for the kind words! By extraoral scanners do you mean lab scanners? Lab scanners are an interesting product set as many labs these days just use IOS to digitise impressions. We personally use E4 by 3Shape which has been excellent. Many other good options exist like the Medit one too.

@@InstituteofDigitalDentistry Hi, and thanks for your answer. I misspoke, I was referring to Panoramic X-Ray machines, Cephalo and CBCT... Those go from 15k€ up to 80k€ in my country and it's difficult to get objective non advertisement information on the subject.

@@filsdugrand Totally agree. I personally use a DEXIS CBCT. We have had the same one for close to 15 years decades and I have been really happy with it. I have also heard great things about Planmeca and VATECH options. It is hard to get an objective opinion because not many few people have multiple CBCTs so it is hard to compare if you have only used one. Jordan in this episode does give some tips and pointers. I would say the first thing to figure out is how big you want the FOV and then work from there

Read this - instituteofdigitaldentistry.com/intraoral-scanner-reviews/primescan-2-intraoral-scanner-review/ It covers everything. If you have good internet, it is as good as PS1 but comes with all the advantages of cloud computing. If you don't have good internet, Primescan 1 will be better for you.

It works very well. Close to TRIOS, which is the GOAT of scanning bloody surgery sites.

Its great at scanning. Very good, basically, but TRIOS 5 is still the best for edenutlous. Elite is very very close and works well as an all-round scanner.

That team should be very proud of what they achieved. Incredible innovation!