Tudor and Rolex have identical fit and finish. Both are very high quality and as solid as you can imagine. Winding the dial on a Tudor BB is absolutely perfect.
I have a Rolex GMT 2 and a ceramic Sub. I also have the Tudor BB Harrods and the Pelagos 42. It's simple really. If you want a thinner case, go Rolex. Nothing else really matters other than the amount you want to pay for watch. The clasps are the same, unless you're talking about the Pelagos .... Which has the best clasp by far for me.
Really liked your review style so just subscribed to your channel! Could you tell me which strap you’ve got on your Casio duro, and where I can get one please? 🙏
I always wanted a Submariner. That was when the 16610 was the latest model. After the maxi ceramic 116610 was released, coupled with prices going up and availability going down, I started to lose interest in Rolex. After the BB58 was released in 2018, it solved all the issues I had with the new subs. And now I’m purchasing the new BB54 soon. I still have love for Rolex, but Tudor is more beloved.
So wait you like a smaller dial = Tudor But you like a thinner watch = Rolex You like the Chrono = Tudor You like the Clasp = Rolex You like the look = Tudor All this = Rolex Daytona Panda 🐼 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂LMAO Just saying however same price as these two put together
I made the same decision as you did, only I had to decide between the no date sub and the 41 sub heritage. 2 years now in the bb and i cant be happier with it. Yet my stupid heart aches for a rolly...
I like your channel and am looking forward to seeing it grow. Just my $.02, but I think these sorts of vids work better when the comparisons are apples:apples. Doesn’t have to be red delicious apples:red delicious apples. But, a panda chronograph isn’t even in the same phylum as a GMT explorer. So, the comparison doesn’t really work. Also, to 99.9% of the population, there’s no functional difference b/t 100m WR and 200m WR. No one is diving 30ft w/either of these watches on, let alone 300ft.
Good effort, but you can't just compare "specs". One look at the Polar - and I have one - and you think Fcuk Me, YES! You look at the Tudor Chrono and you think Meh, Generic, Derivitive, Just another Watch. Why? Rolex watches - most of them - are ICONS, largely unchanged in 50 or 70 years, and so are images that are burned into our skulls as ICONIC. That's why the only Omega that I could give a shit about is the Moon Watch - it looks are unchanged since the 1960's. The rest of their lineup changes from day to day, and is all about special editions, etc. NO THANKS. Give me a Rolex or give me Death. I have 4 Rolexes, and will have more. I also have a Royal Oak - for EXACTLY the same reasoning. D-U-H-!
Please just talk normally, not that ridiculous Jamerican accent or whatever it was meant to be - you're dealing with expensive watches, not talking about Nike trainers - your channel will appreciate it!!
Tudor and Rolex have identical fit and finish. Both are very high quality and as solid as you can imagine. Winding the dial on a Tudor BB is absolutely perfect.
I have a Rolex GMT 2 and a ceramic Sub. I also have the Tudor BB Harrods and the Pelagos 42. It's simple really. If you want a thinner case, go Rolex. Nothing else really matters other than the amount you want to pay for watch. The clasps are the same, unless you're talking about the Pelagos .... Which has the best clasp by far for me.
Really liked your review style so just subscribed to your channel! Could you tell me which strap you’ve got on your Casio duro, and where I can get one please? 🙏
I believe I got it from amazon.
www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0BZSCH7VX/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Well reasoned, great choice
I always wanted a Submariner. That was when the 16610 was the latest model. After the maxi ceramic 116610 was released, coupled with prices going up and availability going down, I started to lose interest in Rolex.
After the BB58 was released in 2018, it solved all the issues I had with the new subs. And now I’m purchasing the new BB54 soon. I still have love for Rolex, but Tudor is more beloved.
Good call my friend, agreed
So wait you like a smaller dial = Tudor
But you like a thinner watch = Rolex
You like the Chrono = Tudor
You like the Clasp = Rolex
You like the look = Tudor
All this = Rolex Daytona Panda 🐼
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂LMAO
Just saying however same price as these two put together
HA! Totally true mate, if only there was someone in my life who could really pull their finger out and get one!
I made the same decision as you did, only I had to decide between the no date sub and the 41 sub heritage. 2 years now in the bb and i cant be happier with it. Yet my stupid heart aches for a rolly...
Yeah all Rolex hands and indices are gold even when they paint them black like that. It helps them to never tarnish
I like your channel and am looking forward to seeing it grow. Just my $.02, but I think these sorts of vids work better when the comparisons are apples:apples. Doesn’t have to be red delicious apples:red delicious apples. But, a panda chronograph isn’t even in the same phylum as a GMT explorer. So, the comparison doesn’t really work. Also, to 99.9% of the population, there’s no functional difference b/t 100m WR and 200m WR. No one is diving 30ft w/either of these watches on, let alone 300ft.
Hey mate, great advice there. Thank you for taking the time to write it down. I agree with almost everything you've said. Many thanks.
A sub is a sub, a BB is a BB. The perspective is not even the same
Good effort, but you can't just compare "specs". One look at the Polar - and I have one - and you think Fcuk Me, YES! You look at the Tudor Chrono and you think Meh, Generic, Derivitive, Just another Watch. Why? Rolex watches - most of them - are ICONS, largely unchanged in 50 or 70 years, and so are images that are burned into our skulls as ICONIC. That's why the only Omega that I could give a shit about is the Moon Watch - it looks are unchanged since the 1960's. The rest of their lineup changes from day to day, and is all about special editions, etc. NO THANKS. Give me a Rolex or give me Death. I have 4 Rolexes, and will have more. I also have a Royal Oak - for EXACTLY the same reasoning. D-U-H-!
You Amy well be right that it is wrong to compare them on pure specs alone, but you gotta do what you gotta do, lol. Thanks for the comment mate
Please just talk normally, not that ridiculous Jamerican accent or whatever it was meant to be - you're dealing with expensive watches, not talking about Nike trainers - your channel will appreciate it!!
Ha! That is just my voice, lol! But thanks