I would argue that Lucky remains subservient to Pozzo because it gives his life meaning, he is the only character with a purpose hence why he is named Lucky, Beckett is saying that he is Lucky to have something to work for.
Does this really count as meaning? Meaning is what makes u feel valuable I guess, but what's the point of finding meaning if it is by finding ourselves slaves for Power and political systems and work? We are tricked into thinking there's meaning in what we do if it's like that. There's no great meaning or something to wait for. We should just live.... My proof is the guy saying there's plenty of leaves when there isn't much.
I hadn't thought about that but you may be right because I don't think that writers randomly name their characters. Especially not when there are so few and all the names are uncommon. Then again maybe the randomness is the idea. Maybe Beckett would disagree with our attempts to find meaning in a name, in a character and in his play.
watching this for a class. I wish that the burden of being forced to do something was not a thing. learning would be more fun and we'd appreciate things like this more. Thank you for posting this. It is very informational
You are not forced to watch this. One may have compulsory school but even then they do not have to do anything. You could skip class or do something else but you are there because you consider it beneficial or fun. In schools there quite often are assignments for the students to analyze things such as a play and when a student thinks of the play and writes their thoughts down in a comprehensible way they think of it more and more and understand it more thoroughly compared to just watching it on their free time. Of course you are free to do such things on your free time. You are free to do whatever you wish and are not bound to a teacher you most probably chose as your teacher.
Thank you so much..that was really helpful..i have a drama exam about ''waiting for Gadot'' tomorrow and this really helped me to understand few points❤
Like a lot of Beckett, I believe this is a play about the workings of ONE body. I keep finding references to subtle body systems in a lot of his work. On my most recent reread of Godot, it was really apparent. Very generally, and top down, the same way the characters are introduced: Estragon is Anya - intuition, always wants to sleep or escape reality (his boots) as they hurt him, likes carrots (a clue). Vlad is Vishudda - he is rational expression, always telling Estragon what to do, concerned with the order of events and the concreteness of reality, carries turnips (a vaguer clue). The tree is Anahata - "everything's dead but the tree." Grows leaves after the boy first appears. Vlad and Estra spend their whole time around it, they even pretend to be it "for the balance," encounter it and want to hang themselves from it, try to hide behind it, but ultimately choose to wait. Pozzo is Manipura - forceful, willful, subjugating, likes to sit and eat. Lucky is Svadhisthana - creativity, sexuality (though completely at the mercy of Pozzo's will). When given agency, he can speak, though it's masturbatory in nature. Almost every interaction between Lucky and Pozzo is a dick joke. Carries two bags full of sand and a stool. Hah. The boy is Muladhara - doesn't know anything, just is. Tends the goats (and the Sheep). Knows Godot, but doesn't really know about him. Innocent, respectful, quick to flee. Now, to meet Godot (Sahasrara) at the tree, they stumble around the right idea, but never figure it out. Tragicomedy. Estra has the idea but not the rationale, Vlad has the rational (an erection! hmm... he ends up with Lucky's hat), Pozzo would have the will do to it and enough despair at the end, and Lucky literally has the rope. The boy confirms they're at the right place and Godot is coming, but also that Godot does nothing. To meet Godot, they should hang themselves. The whole thing reads very clearly and full of insight if you keep this in mind. Too long of a post, the end.
Make a video analysis on Vijay Tendulkar's Silence! The Court Is In Session. It's a tremendous play exploring the hypocrisy of the patriarchal society. Just go through it and make an analysis of this play. I am requesting you sir because your way of analysis and speaking make us mesmerised. Love from India and do produce more quality contents to help the students of Literature.
It's clearly about God, that by not existing, will never come for those who irrationaly keep waiting for him, waiting for a savior to provide meaning is a waste of life.
One major question has not been addressed in this analysis; Who is Godot? If Godot represents God, then the boy is a priest (tends the sheep and the goats, in other words, people). He says Godot treats him well, but beats his brother (God is capricious, life is random). He says Godot will come tomorrow (what priests say about the 2nd coming, or the rapture). Also the line 'What if we dropped him?' 'He'd punish us'. Only God (who they have never met, or even seen) could know that they had become atheists and so would send them to Hell.
I seriously struggle to understand why someone like Samuel Beckett got a Nobel Prize. I mean I get that authors of his time were trying to find a meaning to life after the world wars and everything, but I still don't fully understand the point of a play like this one.
@@elladanzig4514 It's more simple than it seems. Basically, the play is about how life is meaningless. People exist in a state of semi-permanent stagnation (ended only when we die) waiting for something that will never come. Godot represents the thing we're always waiting for, whether that be your next meal, your next vacation, the next game, your next date, or even your death. The harsh irony is that once the thing we've been waiting for arrives we simply find something new to wait for and everything we do in between is merely killing time until it arrives. The idea is that this process of waiting and waiting and figuring out ways to distract ourselves is absurd; it doesn't make any sense. The very fact of life itself is absurd, which is reflected by the absurdity of the play. Although, the play seems to come from a purely logistical point of view. Of course waiting for something that will never come is silly and the ways we distract ourselves is ultimately meaningless, but that removes feelings from the equation. There is no logic to life so we have to find meaning in the way we feel and seek the things that make us happy until the fateful day when all feeling is stripped away. Life is absurd, meaning is absurd, everything is absurd, so we just have to be happy. It's basically its own cosmic horror. Nothing we do will ever matter in the grand scheme of things, so why not just enjoy ourselves while we're here?
It's an absurdist play. There is no god which is why there is no greater meaning and that's what makes our life absurd. There IS no god in first place to be mocked. That's absurdism for you.
Sorry, this fellow hasn't the foggiest idea what this play is about. It is not about the futility of life. Like the other Beckett plans-- Krapps Last Tape, Happy Days, and Endgame-- it is autobiographical. The characters and situations have meaning. The "wait" has meaning.
Fascinating. Where Lovecraft needed to create monsters beyond imagination to inspire a feeling of insignificance, all Beckett did was point out what we're doing. How terrifically bleak.
The link of Course Hero website is in the description. Study material of this play is available on website. You can also turn on captions or download video and download subtitles from another website.
In the meaningless absurdity we live in, the only answer is for people not to intentionally hurt each other and I think life will become so much better even if not perfect.. perfection is an illusion just like gods in the past and the abrahamic God we know today, let's just be good for no reason like heaven or smthn
it gives the sense of being universal all along. the setting or costumes do not give any characteristic of a specific time or place from earth, or like any culture, to imply all humanity's circumtance. the emptiness of the setting is because the writer already discourses the meaningless of the life, so he would make it as abstract as he could do.
there is duality because -i personally think- duality represents the balance of the world and relationships. everything exist with it's counterpart to complete each other; like black and white, femininity and masculanity and earth and sky.
Guddo indeed, which like your pronunciation of Van Gough as "Van Go" is wrong. American audiences are wrong. What you miss -because of your Hubris- is the fact that Godot isnt French it is an Irish word which means forever, which is how long Vladimir and Estragon wait for Godot; forever, because he isnt coming.
I would argue that Lucky remains subservient to Pozzo because it gives his life meaning, he is the only character with a purpose hence why he is named Lucky, Beckett is saying that he is Lucky to have something to work for.
thanks
Does this really count as meaning?
Meaning is what makes u feel valuable I guess, but what's the point of finding meaning if it is by finding ourselves slaves for Power and political systems and work?
We are tricked into thinking there's meaning in what we do if it's like that.
There's no great meaning or something to wait for. We should just live....
My proof is the guy saying there's plenty of leaves when there isn't much.
To be honest, when you are desperate, any meaning is valid.
Never thought of it that way. Ur logic sounds reasonable since lucky is obedient even when Pozzo is blind
I hadn't thought about that but you may be right because I don't think that writers randomly name their characters. Especially not when there are so few and all the names are uncommon. Then again maybe the randomness is the idea. Maybe Beckett would disagree with our attempts to find meaning in a name, in a character and in his play.
watching this for a class. I wish that the burden of being forced to do something was not a thing. learning would be more fun and we'd appreciate things like this more. Thank you for posting this. It is very informational
You are not forced to watch this. One may have compulsory school but even then they do not have to do anything. You could skip class or do something else but you are there because you consider it beneficial or fun. In schools there quite often are assignments for the students to analyze things such as a play and when a student thinks of the play and writes their thoughts down in a comprehensible way they think of it more and more and understand it more thoroughly compared to just watching it on their free time. Of course you are free to do such things on your free time. You are free to do whatever you wish and are not bound to a teacher you most probably chose as your teacher.
If you weren't forced to, you wouldn't do anything.
Exactly
@@ThePrimeMinisterOfTheBlock You are wrong.
@@G-ManXErlik oh? Do go on, I'm fascinated
This analysis has done justice to the work
The best analysis of the drama is in of course in Course Hero. ♥️♥️♥️❤️
Thank you so much..that was really helpful..i have a drama exam about ''waiting for Gadot'' tomorrow and this really helped me to understand few points❤
You should be a moroccan student 😅
Writing mine tomorrow
0:09 Plot Summary
3:20 Characters
6:24 Symbols
9:25 Themes
12:30 Motifs
Thank you
Like a lot of Beckett, I believe this is a play about the workings of ONE body. I keep finding references to subtle body systems in a lot of his work. On my most recent reread of Godot, it was really apparent. Very generally, and top down, the same way the characters are introduced: Estragon is Anya - intuition, always wants to sleep or escape reality (his boots) as they hurt him, likes carrots (a clue). Vlad is Vishudda - he is rational expression, always telling Estragon what to do, concerned with the order of events and the concreteness of reality, carries turnips (a vaguer clue). The tree is Anahata - "everything's dead but the tree." Grows leaves after the boy first appears. Vlad and Estra spend their whole time around it, they even pretend to be it "for the balance," encounter it and want to hang themselves from it, try to hide behind it, but ultimately choose to wait. Pozzo is Manipura - forceful, willful, subjugating, likes to sit and eat. Lucky is Svadhisthana - creativity, sexuality (though completely at the mercy of Pozzo's will). When given agency, he can speak, though it's masturbatory in nature. Almost every interaction between Lucky and Pozzo is a dick joke. Carries two bags full of sand and a stool. Hah. The boy is Muladhara - doesn't know anything, just is. Tends the goats (and the Sheep). Knows Godot, but doesn't really know about him. Innocent, respectful, quick to flee. Now, to meet Godot (Sahasrara) at the tree, they stumble around the right idea, but never figure it out. Tragicomedy. Estra has the idea but not the rationale, Vlad has the rational (an erection! hmm... he ends up with Lucky's hat), Pozzo would have the will do to it and enough despair at the end, and Lucky literally has the rope. The boy confirms they're at the right place and Godot is coming, but also that Godot does nothing. To meet Godot, they should hang themselves. The whole thing reads very clearly and full of insight if you keep this in mind. Too long of a post, the end.
To be clear, "they should hang themselves" really means, they should throw all in on capital L love, or Christ Consciousness, or whathaveyou.
This explanation is much more compelling
Ur comment made me smile. Well-developed and well-interpreted ❤
How come you know of Chakras in the human body? It's Ancient Hindu Yogic Philosophy 🕉️ but what an amazing explanation connecting all those together
this video literally got me 80% on my ESSAY! THANK YOU!
The play doesn't have linear structure but a circular, the plot you you create is loosing the idea of absurd play
Excellent and clear analysis...Thanks a ton!
Make a video analysis on Vijay Tendulkar's Silence! The Court Is In Session. It's a tremendous play exploring the hypocrisy of the patriarchal society. Just go through it and make an analysis of this play. I am requesting you sir because your way of analysis and speaking make us mesmerised. Love from India and do produce more quality contents to help the students of Literature.
Thank you man, it's really a very detailed and useful video 💙
Really too good....Russell your content is way much resourceful ✌👍
Beckett himself said that it was "the theatre of the absurd" and that it had no meaning.
Concise and great as always.
It's clearly about God, that by not existing, will never come for those who irrationaly keep waiting for him, waiting for a savior to provide meaning is a waste of life.
Great upload! 👌👌
Course Hero my hero
Thanks a lot!
Thanks a lot 🙏this is really helpful 💜
Thank you so much!
Plea could you talk about the games
What about the language they use
This is great. Thank you.
Thank you Very much Sir ❤️❤️
I'm wondering how a religious person think about this play?
Id argue the “climax”, as much as this play can have a climax, is vladimir’s soliloquy just after pozzo and lucky depart the second time
Thank you so much sir
Well done.
Thank You for the explanation 😊
what if Vladimir was dreaming or hallucinating?
what if they were in the purgatory?
One major question has not been addressed in this analysis; Who is Godot? If Godot represents God, then the boy is a priest (tends the sheep and the goats, in other words, people). He says Godot treats him well, but beats his brother (God is capricious, life is random). He says Godot will come tomorrow (what priests say about the 2nd coming, or the rapture).
Also the line 'What if we dropped him?' 'He'd punish us'. Only God (who they have never met, or even seen) could know that they had become atheists and so would send them to Hell.
thaaaaaanks a lot
Best video ever !!!
5 characters…the boy is important
I seriously struggle to understand why someone like Samuel Beckett got a Nobel Prize. I mean I get that authors of his time were trying to find a meaning to life after the world wars and everything, but I still don't fully understand the point of a play like this one.
A very useful video for invalids!
Why am I the only one not watching this for a class
i am so fucking confused
this video is helpful but i am just so confused 😭😭😭😭😭
@@elladanzig4514 It's more simple than it seems. Basically, the play is about how life is meaningless. People exist in a state of semi-permanent stagnation (ended only when we die) waiting for something that will never come. Godot represents the thing we're always waiting for, whether that be your next meal, your next vacation, the next game, your next date, or even your death. The harsh irony is that once the thing we've been waiting for arrives we simply find something new to wait for and everything we do in between is merely killing time until it arrives. The idea is that this process of waiting and waiting and figuring out ways to distract ourselves is absurd; it doesn't make any sense. The very fact of life itself is absurd, which is reflected by the absurdity of the play.
Although, the play seems to come from a purely logistical point of view. Of course waiting for something that will never come is silly and the ways we distract ourselves is ultimately meaningless, but that removes feelings from the equation. There is no logic to life so we have to find meaning in the way we feel and seek the things that make us happy until the fateful day when all feeling is stripped away. Life is absurd, meaning is absurd, everything is absurd, so we just have to be happy. It's basically its own cosmic horror. Nothing we do will ever matter in the grand scheme of things, so why not just enjoy ourselves while we're here?
10:55 brat desno ne drzi kanap alo ba zbunjujes ljude sta nije jasno
İzleyelim bakalım vize öncesi
Isnt this play mocking religion tbh???
It's an absurdist play. There is no god which is why there is no greater meaning and that's what makes our life absurd. There IS no god in first place to be mocked. That's absurdism for you.
Baji theek keh Rahi hai aap
So loud
find yourself another if you don't like it
Sorry, this fellow hasn't the foggiest idea what this play is about. It is not about the futility of life. Like the other Beckett plans-- Krapps Last Tape, Happy Days, and Endgame-- it is autobiographical. The characters and situations have meaning. The "wait" has meaning.
The manner of speech of the narrator is so irritating.
True
Agreed
Exactly he should speak calmly
Nothing sinister about his tone.Clearly,you have not followed him from inception.If it doesn’t interests you find yourself other lessons
I said irritating not sinister lol 😂
Fascinating. Where Lovecraft needed to create monsters beyond imagination to inspire a feeling of insignificance, all Beckett did was point out what we're doing.
How terrifically bleak.
Thank you so much!🙏🏻
writing an essay on this and it helped a lot. thank you!!
Uploaded at the right time!
He reminds me of Manny from Modern Family xD great vid
It can't be a coincidence that estragon, representing suffering, wears the same green and white ensemble as Prosecutor Godot
hi may i ask you a text or some kinda subtitle of this video for people who's hearing impaired like me. thank you so much already now.
The link of Course Hero website is in the description. Study material of this play is available on website. You can also turn on captions or download video and download subtitles from another website.
Great analysis. What an interesting play
Your energy level contrasts with that of the play
God this bloke is irritating!
I even can't understand and have to try really hard to concentrate on what he's saying, maybe slow the video down.
ini drama aneh bgt dah
Thanking you soooo much!!!
In the meaningless absurdity we live in, the only answer is for people not to intentionally hurt each other and I think life will become so much better even if not perfect.. perfection is an illusion just like gods in the past and the abrahamic God we know today, let's just be good for no reason like heaven or smthn
Can you make a composition about waiting for godot?
What's difference between nihilism, absurdism and existancialism?
This seems like the rambling of a mad man.
Awful and simplistic analysis.
What’s the importance of settings in waiting for Godot ?
it gives the sense of being universal all along. the setting or costumes do not give any characteristic of a specific time or place from earth, or like any culture, to imply all humanity's circumtance. the emptiness of the setting is because the writer already discourses the meaningless of the life, so he would make it as abstract as he could do.
@@ringaroundthemoonyy2291 Bruh ! I did graduate from uni I don’t need the answer anymore but thx 😂
@@xxdevilxx8657 hahaha i guessed but i wanted to share my idea anyways cause it may sometimes be very beneficial for life. youre welcomee
@@ringaroundthemoonyy2291 thank u sweety ♥️
very good
i want video on man and superman as well
Amazing. Thanks.
Godot bless Course Hero!
Wonderful video. It was the first play I read by Beckett. Anyone has any othee suggestions I might enjoy?
Happy Days, Endgame, Footfalls
I wish you could explain WHY some things are the way they are. Like the duality. We know there's certain repetition in the play, but why?
My guess is that it's supposed to be indicative of the repetitive nature of living day after day.
there is duality because -i personally think- duality represents the balance of the world and relationships. everything exist with it's counterpart to complete each other; like black and white, femininity and masculanity and earth and sky.
Life n death mate. Without death there is no life. Without life there is no death.
That was amazing!
Guddo indeed, which like your pronunciation of Van Gough as "Van Go" is wrong. American audiences are wrong. What you miss -because of your Hubris- is the fact that Godot isnt French it is an Irish word which means forever, which is how long Vladimir and Estragon wait for Godot; forever, because he isnt coming.