Hello guys! Thank You very much for watching this video. Please give me suggestions about my future video... :-) ==> You can also "Like" us on facebook ==> facebook.com/AllLabExperiments
i´m also using origin 8, i´ve watched a lot of videos about how to get the FWHM value, but none have helped me, the route they use isn´t the same as the one i have here
Hi! I said its gaussian fit. But the function is same as that of gauss. I guess they will give the same results while fitting. One can compare between the two by fitting using both of these functions one by one. Even I will test this n post whatever i get sooner or later... Origin has too many options and generally we skip many of them. so sometimes we go for something and then we stay with it and don,t explore other options... Have a good day
Select limited region so that it can fit over data very easily. Or you can do this using gaussian peak fitting... And then control its parameters for better fitting. Check put my peak fitting video for this.
Use sherrer,s formula. In case of nano particles crystallite size is most probably equal to the particle size. Watch my video on crystallite grain and particle size.
@@varshinipreethi3189 its your learning phasey dear. I think you shpuld do this by yourself. You can also watch my video on XRD all you need to know. You will get to know about these data and its interpretation.
Hello guys! Thank You very much for watching this video. Please give me suggestions about my future video... :-)
==> You can also "Like" us on facebook ==>
facebook.com/AllLabExperiments
thank you very much. it is so helpful
i´m also using origin 8, i´ve watched a lot of videos about how to get the FWHM value, but none have helped me, the route they use isn´t the same as the one i have here
Nice one
Why do you choose " Gauss" Rather than "Gaussian" From the list? What is the difference between the two? As you were speaking about " Gaussian"
Hi! I said its gaussian fit. But the function is same as that of gauss. I guess they will give the same results while fitting. One can compare between the two by fitting using both of these functions one by one. Even I will test this n post whatever i get sooner or later...
Origin has too many options and generally we skip many of them. so sometimes we go for something and then we stay with it and don,t explore other options...
Have a good day
excellent demonstration but have not find the same result while using these both ways.
this depends upon the range of fitting and the randomness in your data.
what can i do if the red line doesn´t try to fit the peak i selected but the whole graphic instead
Select limited region so that it can fit over data very easily. Or you can do this using gaussian peak fitting... And then control its parameters for better fitting. Check put my peak fitting video for this.
@@AllLabExperiments thank you for your help and time
Thank you sir then how can I calculate the size of nanoparticle
Use sherrer,s formula. In case of nano particles crystallite size is most probably equal to the particle size. Watch my video on crystallite grain and particle size.
@@AllLabExperiments sir will you help me m having XRD data but it's too hard to do
@@varshinipreethi3189 its your learning phasey dear. I think you shpuld do this by yourself. You can also watch my video on XRD all you need to know. You will get to know about these data and its interpretation.
@@AllLabExperiments ok sir thank u I will do sir
How can we get FWHM value in origin 8.5
Method is the same. Use those gadgets for quick one or perform proper fitting
thk u