Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

How to solve 9^x -6^x =4^x |-Exponential Equation |-Algebra problem (@mathsjourney6608)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 9 гру 2022
  • #exponential #algebra
    #maths#matholympiad #maths
    #algebra #exponential #fractions #algebraformulas #mathematics #algebramathematics #howtolearnmathsfrombasics #howtolearnmathsfromthebeginning #product #laws #lawsofexponent #lawofexponential

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @glupilazni1399
    @glupilazni1399 Рік тому +1

    Much simple solution is no matter of X:
    9 will always give you number ending with 1 or 9,
    6 will always give you number that ends on 6,
    4 will always give you number that ends with 4 or 6
    In no matter which real number combination you will never get the number that ends with 4 or 6

  • @user-sd9bo2hi6z
    @user-sd9bo2hi6z 5 місяців тому +1

    1.186

  • @Xephoriath
    @Xephoriath 10 місяців тому +1

    Amazing explanation and approach, I figured I'd give the problem a try before watching and came to this conclusion, numerically the answers are the same but slightly different approach/outcome. Thanks for sharing this fun problem!
    9^x=6^x+4^x
    ln(9^x)=ln(6^x+4^x)
    xln(9)=ln((6^x)*(1+(4/6)^x))
    xln(9)=xln(6)+ln(1+(2/3)^x))
    xln(9)-xln(6)=ln(1+(2/3)^x))
    xln(3/2)=ln(1+(2/3)^x))
    e^(xln(3/2)=e^(ln(1+(2/3)^x))
    e^(ln((3/2)^x))=e^(ln(1+(2/3)^x))
    (3/2)^x=1+(2/3)^x
    (3/2)^x=1+(3/2)^-x
    u-substitutiuon:
    u=(3/2)^x
    u=1+(1/u)
    u^2=u+1
    u^2-u-1=0
    Quadratic Formula:
    u=(-(-1)±sqrt((-1)^2-4*1*(-1)))/(2*1)
    u=(1±sqrt(5))/2
    Plugging u back in:
    (3/2)^x=(1±sqrt(5))/2
    xln(3/2)=ln((1±sqrt(5))/2)
    x=ln((1-sqrt(5))/2)/ln(3/2)
    x=Not a Real Number
    x=ln((1+sqrt(5))/2)/ln(3/2)
    x≈1.186814 Final Answer!

  • @piotrsobodzian5232
    @piotrsobodzian5232 Рік тому +1

    The closed form solution is: x = asinh(-0.5)/ln(2/3) and x = -asinh(-0.5)/ln(2/3)

  • @ChristalinePosiyano-nb5mg
    @ChristalinePosiyano-nb5mg Рік тому +2

    Hy...why did you chose to devide throughout by 3^2x not by 2^2x?

  • @samwinchester2094
    @samwinchester2094 Рік тому +1

    you can solve it more easier if you divide each number to 4^x

  • @ichiyt3762
    @ichiyt3762 Рік тому +1

    why we didnt divide on 2^x as well

  • @emidiocavucci884
    @emidiocavucci884 10 місяців тому

    For me the calculator reports x= 4.879 considering the "+" in front of the root

  • @TheHorrorsPersistButSoDoI
    @TheHorrorsPersistButSoDoI Рік тому

    How can something positive ^x be negative?

    • @mathsjourney6608
      @mathsjourney6608  Рік тому

      Thanks for watching, please can you highlights where you talking about?

    • @TheHorrorsPersistButSoDoI
      @TheHorrorsPersistButSoDoI Рік тому

      ​@@mathsjourney6608the soultion at the end, you should have added u=(-1-sqrt5)/2 is not possiblle