Magnus so casually destroys players I will never be able to beat. It's absurd trying to quantify how incredibly good he is. If I live long enough, I hope to play a variation known as the Carlsen and reminisce to my grandchildren how I used to watch the great maestro play on UA-cam.
@@mikecantreed I didn't mention the 2800 level. And certainly beating an IM doesn't make MAGNUS special. Everything else about his chess career does. It seems the spirit of your comment missed the point I was making entirely.
I always wonder how GMs 3 min Blitz games seem so longer even talking and analysing moves along with talking to chat, while my own games often seems to vaporize so quickly without any of multitasking; even before I am able to finish off my opponents in completely good positions... Its so frustrating to keep losing on time in good positions..
because they just don't consider senseless moves; most often they see the right move instantly; it was trained in their childhood so it's not they're working hard during the game
I'm sorry if you're not a native speaker but the subtitles are not so accurate sometimes. I would also recommend using the youtube Closed Caption feature instead of manually editing captions :)
So many people in the comment section asking what happened at 3:02. It is called "Premove", people. You play the next move in anticipation of opponent's move. So when magnus played knight to B5, he anticipated that knight will be taken out by bishop on the next move. So he pre-moved pawn takes bishop. Saves few seconds.
Whats that move at minute 3? Where you play two moves at once, your night followed immediately by taking your own night with your own pawn. I feel like I'm in the twilight zone
Its a Pre-move. He's anticipating that black will take his Knight and once that happens he will recapture with the Pawn. Of course this is only possible in online chess.
It's how math works but it's not how elo works. The difference between a 3100 and a 2800 is most likely something like 1500 vs 500. If not more. The higher you go, the more the differences will mean. Climbing up 50 elos in high ranking would be like couple hundreds in lower rankings.
@@purde9349 elo uses the win probability formula 1 / (1 + 10^((R1 - R2) / 400)). It turns out that the same relative ratings (like 3100 to 2800 and 1200 to 900) always have the same win probability. The difference is that there are fewer people with the elos 3100 or 2800. Correct me if I'm wrong.
@That Awesome Guy You are absolutely right. It's why I said the math checks out. But this isn't about the math part. Simply the skill differences between the players. Take it like this: you can go up until well above a 1k rating without even thinking about learning openings or things like that. Even blundering less can get you from 500 to 1000. But if a 2800 rated player could change something so trivial and get 3100, we would have a lot more players with the latter rating. But at some point, the differences in rankings are going to be so in-depth, that lower-rated players would simply not even understand it probably. And this can simply be seen by how much easier it is to go from 900 to 1200 than from 2800 to 3100. Also factor in how people with these higher ratings most likely dedicate most of their lives to chess. A person with a rating of 900 probably plays chess while eating or waiting for the bus, yet they can still climb.
Castling too soon as black is a common mistake. It is better to be ready to castle but time the actual castle. Sometimes it is better to just play a timely h6 before castling. In fact, in my playing through Karpov's games the only flaw in his game I saw that showed up occasionally was castling a couple of moves too soon. Cost him a game against Yasser Seirawan, for example.
Does this apply to other openings for black against 1.d4 2.c4 or just the QGD. I play the Dutch and sometimes KID, and you Castle very quickly in both of them.
What happened there, he played his horse, and on the same move made his pawn jump diagonally and eat his own horse and the pawn took the place of the horse.... what was that
@@chessmath_ it happened at minute 3 of the video, ive never seen two moves played at once and I've never seen someone take their own horse with a pawn. Whats that move called?
If you don't know how to translate a video you shouldn't try to do it. And if it's done like that on purpose, I don't know what kind of maniac would find this funny.
"Teaches queens gambit to 2800"... when Magnus was doing pretty mediocre in the opening and made multiple inaccuracies... wow... Magnus is not what he used to be.. what ever happened to him pawn storming kingside in these positions and preparing a winning rook endgame??? So sad
Quite a sad take considering super GMs often purposely make so-called inaccuracies in the openings, especially in blitz, to take their opponents out of theory Also as to your second point of him grinding down opponents with a pawn advantage in a rook endgame, that's in classical chess and this is, once again, blitz So your opinion simply fails to take into account that strategies will differ in different time controls Hope this helps
@@gkorp definitely a strategy when he admits to making the mistakes, regretting doing it, and going "uhh ohh!! Uhh ohhh!!" Yeah Magnus Fan Boy in the house... who didn't even watch the video.. my overall point is that videos are titled differently then their content, especially on channels focused on $$$
Magnus so casually destroys players I will never be able to beat. It's absurd trying to quantify how incredibly good he is. If I live long enough, I hope to play a variation known as the Carlsen and reminisce to my grandchildren how I used to watch the great maestro play on UA-cam.
"Grandpa, what is youtube?"
"Ah, yes, I forgot you don't know what free speach is..."
it be like that
@@michakasprzak7528 let's hope you are wronf
There are lots of players at the 2800 level. Magnus isn’t special for beating an IM at blitz. Casually destroying hikaru would make him special.
@@mikecantreed I didn't mention the 2800 level. And certainly beating an IM doesn't make MAGNUS special. Everything else about his chess career does. It seems the spirit of your comment missed the point I was making entirely.
Step one find a woman
Magnus got so much better at streaming; commentating on the play, drawing the arrows to show options, interacting with chat. 💯
complete package
I know right
Magnus' so effortlessly brilliant
He's goat
The effort happened well before he had an audience.
@@chessyoshi8626 this is true
Looking effortless takes a lot of effort,
Effortlessly dispatching everyone in his path.
His opponent played very well.
I always wonder how GMs 3 min Blitz games seem so longer even talking and analysing moves along with talking to chat, while my own games often seems to vaporize so quickly without any of multitasking; even before I am able to finish off my opponents in completely good positions... Its so frustrating to keep losing on time in good positions..
they've been trained to do that, even as there's no time pressure
@@chessmath_ indeed..
because they just don't consider senseless moves; most often they see the right move instantly; it was trained in their childhood so it's not they're working hard during the game
@@SimplyChess_ thanks for the words.
@@SimplyChess_ 👍🏻
Love how he multitasks while playing a guy ranked over 2800.
❤️
The subtitles are hilarious to read. Must be auto generated gives a touch of humour as well xD.
Thanks. Auto subtitles still have to be checked
Magnus' definition of "frequently" - more frequently than before😮
His opponent is from my country and I think against Magnus he played quite well. I'm happy about that
Great player👍🏻
2:19 "The old bishop takes age 7"
Hemmm 🤔
Lore Accurate
omg
@@Gazuretine lmao
@@Gazuretine lol
No point in putting captions up when they aren’t even correct
'Who knows' the literal world champion lol
I'm sorry if you're not a native speaker but the subtitles are not so accurate sometimes. I would also recommend using the youtube Closed Caption feature instead of manually editing captions :)
Sorry. Actually is auto subtitle
the subtitle had me dying lol
🤭
I love the subtitles 🤣
🫣
who made was subtitles... if you really don't understand I can list all mistakes
Looks like auto generated
@@Julz_99 it's pretty funny
Actually Auto subtitle
@@chessmath_ No offense, i thought if you didnt know i could help. Cool vide, by the way
@@gregorykl2317 thanks. i appreciate it. ❤️
So many people in the comment section asking what happened at 3:02. It is called "Premove", people. You play the next move in anticipation of opponent's move. So when magnus played knight to B5, he anticipated that knight will be taken out by bishop on the next move. So he pre-moved pawn takes bishop. Saves few seconds.
👍🏻
What happened at 3:02 how his horse get killed
Who noticed that the SUBTITLES are wrong 😅
Yeah everybody noticed. Sorry actually is auto subtitle
Whats that move at minute 3? Where you play two moves at once, your night followed immediately by taking your own night with your own pawn. I feel like I'm in the twilight zone
Its a Pre-move. He's anticipating that black will take his Knight and once that happens he will recapture with the Pawn. Of course this is only possible in online chess.
God damn, those subtitles are distracting. Bisch Basics, bishop takes age 7.
😅 sorry. Auto subtitle
2:04 translation at bottom corner be like
"im not sure about bish basics thought, i really like getting 95"
"knight to age 4"
🫣 sorry . That's auto subtitle
@@chessmath_ its fine its funnier xd
Nothing like that Age 4 move
Yeaah❤️
what about that 95 move? bro maybe that Ricky One was the best one
3:57 en passant😩
And you lose the knight
@@samuelcote8453 en passant>knight
This is equivalent to me as 900-1000 playing against 500-600 elo.😂
Not how math works
It's how math works but it's not how elo works. The difference between a 3100 and a 2800 is most likely something like 1500 vs 500. If not more. The higher you go, the more the differences will mean. Climbing up 50 elos in high ranking would be like couple hundreds in lower rankings.
@@purde9349 elo uses the win probability formula 1 / (1 + 10^((R1 - R2) / 400)). It turns out that the same relative ratings (like 3100 to 2800 and 1200 to 900) always have the same win probability. The difference is that there are fewer people with the elos 3100 or 2800. Correct me if I'm wrong.
@That Awesome Guy You are absolutely right. It's why I said the math checks out. But this isn't about the math part. Simply the skill differences between the players. Take it like this: you can go up until well above a 1k rating without even thinking about learning openings or things like that. Even blundering less can get you from 500 to 1000. But if a 2800 rated player could change something so trivial and get 3100, we would have a lot more players with the latter rating. But at some point, the differences in rankings are going to be so in-depth, that lower-rated players would simply not even understand it probably. And this can simply be seen by how much easier it is to go from 900 to 1200 than from 2800 to 3100. Also factor in how people with these higher ratings most likely dedicate most of their lives to chess. A person with a rating of 900 probably plays chess while eating or waiting for the bus, yet they can still climb.
The subtitle is trolling 🤣
the captions xD
I think if u face the Qgbt you shouldn't castle kingside and allow all the ideas behind this setup. I think the black lion is fun vs the qgbt.
Castling too soon as black is a common mistake. It is better to be ready to castle but time the actual castle. Sometimes it is better to just play a timely h6 before castling. In fact, in my playing through Karpov's games the only flaw in his game I saw that showed up occasionally was castling a couple of moves too soon. Cost him a game against Yasser Seirawan, for example.
Does this apply to other openings for black against 1.d4 2.c4 or just the QGD. I play the Dutch and sometimes KID, and you Castle very quickly in both of them.
where does magnus carlsen stream?
Twitch. link in the latest video
What game is this? Never thought you can take your own pieces in chess.
i didnt get it aswell
Very cool
Thanks
how to increade FIDE rating by playing online?
so many moments where i couldnt find the best move....those that were played by Magnus
High accuracy every move
What happened there, he played his horse, and on the same move made his pawn jump diagonally and eat his own horse and the pawn took the place of the horse.... what was that
🤔
@@chessmath_ it happened at minute 3 of the video, ive never seen two moves played at once and I've never seen someone take their own horse with a pawn. Whats that move called?
Let's go Ricky one
Let's go
what are these subtitles
Sorry. That is auto subtitle
If you don't know how to translate a video you shouldn't try to do it. And if it's done like that on purpose, I don't know what kind of maniac would find this funny.
🫣
Where did Black's white bishop go? Come on dude
The subtitles
😊
Don't use auto subs please. Distracting! Great otherwise
Ok . Thanks
That was cool
Hope you guys enjoy
He is very nonchalant about stepping on people’s throat! 😅
where's gambit? it's just an exchange. clickbait :@ dislkike
wtf are those subtitles
Sorry. Actually is auto subtitle
Knight E7 translates to 97. Truly chess expert channel owner.
Thanks. Actually is auto subtitle. 🫡
what are this substitles though hshsha
Sorry, actually is auto subtitle
Lucky
Romania 3 :))
I think it’s a fake game video of Magnus just included
What kind of noob goes rickie four instead of age 6? 🤪🤣
🤭
what is this translate tf
Sorry. Actually is auto subtitle
Opponent missed mate in 1 at the end
no he didn't
🤔
He Was In Check😂
What's more likely: the world champion and an international master both missing M1 or you missing a check?
@@ThePalmWoods I wonder why the net is swelling of arrogant morons. Instead of asking they push a claim.
"Teaches queens gambit to 2800"... when Magnus was doing pretty mediocre in the opening and made multiple inaccuracies... wow... Magnus is not what he used to be.. what ever happened to him pawn storming kingside in these positions and preparing a winning rook endgame??? So sad
Quite a sad take considering super GMs often purposely make so-called inaccuracies in the openings, especially in blitz, to take their opponents out of theory
Also as to your second point of him grinding down opponents with a pawn advantage in a rook endgame, that's in classical chess and this is, once again, blitz
So your opinion simply fails to take into account that strategies will differ in different time controls
Hope this helps
and another clown enters the arena…….
@@gkorp definitely a strategy when he admits to making the mistakes, regretting doing it, and going "uhh ohh!! Uhh ohhh!!" Yeah Magnus Fan Boy in the house... who didn't even watch the video.. my overall point is that videos are titled differently then their content, especially on channels focused on $$$
that is not a gambit. he's exposing the overworked rook. he never had any intentions of giving the queen up, it's a fancy way of trading queens.