"TOTALLY UNEXPECTED" James Webb Telescope May Have Hit the Farthest Point of the Observable Universe
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
- Join Territory to get access to some humble perks:
/ @territoryspace
Einstein's theory of general relativity explains that gravity is the result of the curvature of space-time caused by matter and energy. This curved space-time then governs the paths that energy and matter follow. Therefore, while light usually moves in a straight line, its path can be bent and magnified by the influence of gravity.
We call this phenomenon gravitational lensing, and massive objects like galaxies and galaxy clusters help bend the path of light from objects behind them.
This bending of light works like a lens, magnifying and distorting the image of the background objects.
This phenomenon helps astronomers observe faraway things by acting as a natural telescope. It allows us to see distant galaxies and other cosmic objects that would otherwise be too faint or too far away to detect with our current technology.
Using this method along with the prowess of the James Webb Space Telescope, we have been able to observe five extremely dense proto-globular clusters at the dawn of time itself, which are dense groups of millions of stars held together by gravity, within the Cosmic Gems arc, a galaxy that formed merely 460 million years after the Big Bang.
Subscribe to take a deep dive into the unknown with Territory - / @territoryspace
Instagram - territoryspace
Just because you are looking back in time doesn't mean you are observing creation. The universe could be inconceivably larger and older than what is observable.
Or yunger, no one will realy ever know
@@francoisjohannes3648 Not younger...JWT proves that ...
Getting older as we see it ...
@@bryanherman1035 Getting older as we see it...we may never know how old ...
@@bryanherman1035 its 13.8 billions years old, we know that..
Doesn't the existence of the CMB answer that.🤔
Time to start thinking without a box.
The JWT is sure to uncover more surprises. It has only just begun. Exciting times ahead as long as we don't self-destruct before then.
We have at least another 200 before we self destruct...
@@carllawler2837NASA and SpaceX and other Companies doing great stuff meanwhile Kids on the Internet saying Skibidi Sigma Rizzler Gyatt…
The biggest surprises are to be found in Halton Arps book “Seeing Red”.
Bet a whole English pound on the big bang being the end of the previous universe, not the beginning of this one.
It’s just not clear what that means or what the geometry was. And then was their old stuff left over. Obviously there’s stuff we don’t know
That doesn't explain the first big bang.
@@tahirahmad9645 Yes, it doesn't, but what if "our" Big Bang was not the first?
Every circle begins with its end. Reflection is key.
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
"Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart and soul's fate revealed. In time, all points converge, hope's strength resteeled. But to earn final peace at the universe's endless refrain, we must see all in nothingness... before we start again."
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
--Diamond Dragons (series)
I'll take that bet. Who will hold the stakes?
Here's a question for you all. Would the universe exist if there was no life?
Yes because physical life to evolve needs a physical environment. Consciousness is the first stage for life t9 flourish, one can call it Energy, vibration or " The Word" which is cosmic sound vibration in motion.
Without life there would be no proof that the Universe exists............
Your question appears simple on the surface, but there is much complexity behind it that may not be immediately apparent. This complexity changes the very foundation of the question itself.
Any question originates from a conscious being, and a conscious being occupies a position of perspective and perception.
Therefore, your question not only asks, "Would the universe exist if there were no life?" but also implies and begs the question, "What is life and the consciousness that life brings?"
If life did not exist and there were no consciousness in the universe, then there would also be no perspective and no perception. Without life, the universe would lack an observer to experience the passage of time. The universe would simply transition from its beginning to its end in an instant.
Life, consciousness, and perception provide a foundation for the universe to exist as it does, but only from our perspective. The universe existing for more than a brief nanosecond or less is just another perception born of and important solely to conscious life.
Ask anything not conscious your question, and it will obviously have no answer because the only answers lie with the conscious. Our answers are our perspectives, and our perspectives are everything. Nothing else truly exists for us.
The universe exists in countless ways, and a plethora of which are beyond our comprehension and perception. It exists the way that it does to us and does not, and never will, exist in any other way because our perspective and unique perception are ours and ours alone.
So, does the universe exist if there is no life?
Buddy, it doesn't even exist the second you die or close your eyes at night (sleep).
Well, the universe and everything involved within it, the human brain is has difficulties making sense of what is known to exist, like Black holes, # of galaxies and size of the universe! Add other unexplainable phenomenons that exist like consciousness and existing things here on earth. Now,, think about how much we have no idea that DOES exist. Will really make you believe that anything is possible, if that makes any sense. If our brains cannot handle the complexities that exist, and you will or, at the very least, be aware that, yes their is a 100% chance of alien existing all over the universe, UFOs and its technology is real, powerful energy types of consciousness and.. ohh... duh!! Don't forget the devil might be real, too! 😅
People who say theirs no life in the universe look just as stupid as someone saying UFOs and aliens don't exist!
Yes, just wouldn't be observed from within. Reality isn't dictated by perception, perception just interprets Reality, and Reality even behaves differently upon observation, but still exists with or without our 'help'.
The presence of oxygen in that ancient galaxy is crazy as it signifies a stellar age impossible for a theory proposing early stars as composed of only hydrogen and helium, as oxygen is formed by the fusion of four helium atoms.
The most amazing thing about this is the possibility that it presents. Each galaxy that forms holds multiple potentials for life to develop. Each galaxy has a habitable region in its orbital patterns. Life may have developed somewhere within these regions.
I do know one thing, from the records of the alien technology I was allowed to interact with there was data pertaining to a planet that had been utilized for mining raw material from a planet that may have first formed in these early galaxies. As I understood it the raw mineral was a type of crystalline quartz that had formed from the high density energy of the cosmic radiation that was abundant at that time. The quartz had formed in a way that could channel and filter this energy into a source powerful enough to fuel their interstellar engines by breaking down the reflecting rays and..... I don't know after that. I can't remember. It kinda sounds like some star trek concept but it had more details than some movie knock off, diagrams, algorithmic processes and details of various fused elements used during the process.
bro i want what you are smoking
Very practical info for my job as a waiter, lol...
So interesting. I’ve wondered for a while now if what is called ‘the big bang’ could be more accurately described as ‘the big shift in scale’. My conjecture is that the universe is more like a fractal where there is no scale ground zero. Imagine if we were at the observed galaxy 13 or so billions of years ago that we’d be able to see ‘back’ another 13 billion years.
You should read Nassim Harramein. Everything is blackholes at different scales all clustered like inter dimensional russian dolls.
I think the universe is a fractal as well. And it just keeps creating itself.
Maybe different dimensions is whatever scale of it you're on, and there are infinite of dimensions.
@@RockBoBsteRMusic Quantum mechanics predicts there are just 26. Informed speculation is better than ignorant speculation.
@@stephenphillips4984 Yeah well, it wasn't really a serious answer. More just for fun. And AI doesn't know everything, jesus.
lol
@@stephenphillips4984 Technically, all of us humans still know more than AI so far. It's barely getting started. Don't start brown nosing already, it ain't gonna spare you.
According to vedas , we have reached the halfway stage of a colossal time frame of approximately 1500 trillion years. One can only speculate as to how many big bangs there might have been.
Life exists at least once a galaxy. What amazes me is the Creator & supposed supernatural operator of all lives who believe & are faithful in all those trillions of galaxies each with billions of stars & planets & moons still has the time & deep interest to help each one of them find their house keys & parking spaces & avoid other people's car accidents & kick goals in football matches.
All that we can really know is that we don't really know much of what some claim to know, and/or try to present as facts.
so the light from the galaxys just after the big bang took 13.8 billion years to get here is that right?
Yes, because the human brain is limited to the thought of complete reality and what's really possible. The things that really do exist, supernatural included .
The observable universe is alot bigger than 13.8B years..
The universe expands alot faster than the speed of light.
Yes, light has a fixed velocity in a vacuum and when you know the distance you could compute the time it would take to get from one point to another
Its like looking back in my brain, to "where did i leave my keys" 🔑
Always the last place you look
If the Earth is 4 Billion years old and the Sun has a lifetime of 10 Billion years, surely the Galaxy must be older than that, and the Universe must be much older than that. 13.8 billion years seems too young.
Hard to say since time is different everywhere. That 13.8 billion years, 900,000 Light years away could have been a totally different amount of time.
Lol, crazy to think about.
The universe is infinite and eternal.
You know this how?
@@pubert4845 Common sense
Prove it!
(We kinda know the universe is 13.8 billion years old).
@@TTime685how whould a infinite universe be common sense?
@@dusermiginte4647 The universe has to be infinite. For it not to be the endless dark empty space would have to come to an end and be replaced by...... what? What could replace the space? It has to be eternal because the alternative is that there used to be nothing and then something came into existence. You can't get something from nothing so there must always have been something - hence no beginning.
as click bait goes... James Webb "may have" made us all a big hot steaming pile of coffee.
Tax paid coffee too.
The universe started from a micro dot that exploded into the universe we now see. Surely there's nothing more absurd !
It's so funny to hear that galaxies could be developed in 100 million years... The standard model is false, this is the reason how it could happen.
Couldn't get the synth to say epoch? 🤣🖖
13.8 billion years seems a ridiculously small piece of time when theres all eternity to go at.
Think of how long you’ve been alive if you really want to be surprised
Who says there's all eternity to go at? You assume - against the evidence of the cosmic background microwave radiation - that there was no beginning.
The universe is twice as old as
ANY finite amount of time is 'ridiculously small' if compared with an _infinite_ amount of time.
@@stephenphillips4984If we're here now then we've always been here.. That's just the most logical and senseable conclusion
6:07 Artificial unintelligence says: "This discovery shattered the previous record for the most distant galaxy, previously held by JADES-GS-z13 that existed when the universe was ONLY 13.4 BILLION YEARS OLD" :D
In other words it simply viewed further than any telescope before it. And the next advanced telescope will view further than that. I doubt we’ll ever advance enough to view the actual outer edge of the universe. We can’t even colonize another planet in our own solar system.
The cosmos models that we now have belong in the trash can. UNTILL YOU PUT GOD BACK INTO THEM
Behold, He comes with Clouds, and every eye shall see him.
Who?
All glory belongs to God
@@paulstevenson4775 and Spiderman, right? 💪😃👍
@@TheWitness2024
God is omnipotent and in control of All.
We are incapable of imagining the glory and power of the Almighty
Giggles appropriate
AND the alternate explanation is AN EXPANDING/SHRINKING UNIVERSE.
Horton heard a WHO ?
Pete Townsend!
How do these people conceive of an “edge” where something (the universe of mass, time and 3 dimensions) interfaces with nothing (literally nothing, not even empty space). It’s the limit test for credulity.
This feels like new science is coming. How can galaxies form less than 300M yrs from the last scattering surface? I thought current estimates place formation at 3x to 4x that time period?
Question: If we are observing light that was generated 13+ billion years ago, how did we get that far away from our point of origin? Wouldn't we have had to travel MUCH faster than the speed of light to outrun the light we now see?
What if that galaxy is older than we think, but just at the edge of our portion of the observable universe? It just expanded away in a different direction.
😅😅
Of course it saw to the furthest point , it's the most advanced we have and was designed to see further than anything.
So by definition , what it sees will be the "farthest we can see"😂
These galaxies that seem to be too old for the model may be moving away from us not only because the expansion of the universe, but moving within the universe away from us. Andromeda is moving towards us. If we used red shift only to find its distance, we would think it’s right on top of us, not 2 million light years away. There are other galaxies that are moving away from us without the dark energy expansion, and we would see them as additionally red shifted, making it look as if they were farther away.
What a BS, you are saying that the light just came to us and didn't disapear or maybe it even didn't came to us yet, because telescope went far. But the gas and mater from which our Sun and planet made already in this space and location. ??? Does this mean that that matter from which our Solar system is made traveled to this universe location faster that first light from that 300mil after big bang thing?
Sadly none of this is going to add anything to our lives.
Aren't there issues here right outside our homes. Thank you tax paying James Webb tele.
Shouldnt we be able to see further in some directions than others if everything we think is true? Unless we are directly center in the universe, which we aren't afaik.
Blaa blaa blaa so the the jwst has hit the edge of the universe with it's super dupa telescope so the question becomes what's on the other side of the edge assuming this tech marvel is relaying accurate unbiased and non corrupted data😮.
I would think that the difficulty of gaining any insight from objects so far away is we really have no idea how old they were when the light left there for us to see it today.?🤔
JWT just discovered that the universe is as flat as a pancake. With raisins and smal pieces of nice goodies of course.
The artificial animations detract from the facts and make it difficult to tell fact from fiction. Because of this I stopped watching after two minuites
Maybe the space expansion acceleration isn’t a constant value and the universe is really much, much older than we think.
I don't think so. There are no cool white dwarfs yet. White dwarfs take longer than the estimated age of the universe to cool and there's no evidence of any. Also, there are no dying red dwarf stars found. They last hundreds of billions to trillions of years. Also, the CMB still has a recordable energy. In the far future it will be too cold to measure and pick up with microwave receivers. It's current temperature is in line with it being a certain age after the time when photons became free, which I think astronomers call The surface of last scattering, about 350,000 years after the Big Bang.
Of course. If you're also knowledgeable with government secret agendas and learned that UFOs and the like are a real thing, don't you think the more they tell us would work against them? its all misinformation and designed to keep us thinking their isn't much or at all any intelligent life in the universe. making it seem like the universe is young and small etc... does just that!!! PEOPLE ARE SO F***NG STUPID!!!! its crazy. they just go with whatever they say;
How can we possibly look back at something that is far younger then it took for us to get to this point and look back at it?
To me James Webb is not working his assxxf it needs to step up its game and find life in the Universe !
What if humans came from a package of seeds and the earth is just a clay pot?😊
One cannot “see” the Big Bang. The temperature was to hot for photons.
Why would the universe look like a rock
j'ai compris! james webb ne regarde pas dans la bonne direction, c'est pourquoi ses observations vont à l'encontre de vos croyances
Thanks Territory, your videos are getting better and better, this one is really good!
But... do you really believe there was a Big Bang?
I think (and I'm not alone in this) that we are observing a period that we can call a transition zone from the previous universe to our current one.
This epoch was an extremely turbulent and unstable period in which our current universe was formed from the remains of its predecessor (and this is exactly what future research will focus on!) and which was mistakenly interpreted as the Big Bang by the previous generation of astrophysicists.
I hope I was able to share with you everything important about the content of this really informative and well-made video... 🔭
Well we do have evidence of big bang regardless what you believe..
Eikö jo pitäisi alkaa ymmärtää, että kosmos on ääretön ja siellä tapahtuu samanlaista galaksien syntyä ja kehitystä etäisyyksistä riippumatta?
You incredible simpletons.
Why show actors in the video?
Totally unsurprising that models of the early universe are wrong. Heck they don't even properly understand how gravity works.
EXACTLY!!!!! Its really sad and has limited o😢ur knowledge when the human brains of these types are the ones running or and part of our science! They are basically like ants, if it's not all theatre and lying to us. And the lying to us a real thing, obviously, so thats a real possibility
Can gravity be bent by light?
I love the arrogance we all believe,,,that we "know" things as fact lol
Lol what?
With the current technology.
This presentation was doing well UNTIL the mention of “dark matter” which “matter” has NEVER been found. “Dark matter” is the unicorn of physics and astronomy.
Wake up! It's very simple: The Cosmic Model Is WRONG.
So stop using the term "since the beginning of time". JWST only shows that this is NOT the beginning of time. Come up with a better model!
It’s not clear what is going on.
@@NicholsonNeisler-fz3gi Yup. Infinity is a bitch to get your head around, ain't it. Even if this universe is finite with definite borders, there is always something on the other side of that border. Even if that something is nothing. So that means that nothing is something.
@@anthonydoyle7370 Wow, that is deep............
Something is nothing therefore nothing must be something.
My 15 year-old kid Burst into my room and screamed “You lied to me!”…..Soooo uuuuh…..Yea NASA….What’s up with that?!?! 😑
Good video, thanks.
when you're in the middle of nowhere (the universe) u can look in evey directions and find things having 13B years but looking young because you think wrong.
If we assume expansion in terms of "big bang" It is incorrect to say the big bang happened. It is an ongoing process and is happening. We humans like things in boxes. The universe is a different animal.
At 6 minutes and 28 seconds you say 13.5 billion when you mean 480 million
Mistake: At 6:15 You said Jades-GS-z13 was the oldest galaxy observed when the galaxy was only 13.4 billions years old....thats only about 400 million years ago...perhaps you mean 13.4 billion light years away or 400 Million years old?
Epoch, not epic. Please programme your synthetic voice gizmo properly!😉 Great content; please keep it up.
So, what about the ex nihilo of our universe? The crox? It may be infinite, however, it has laws.
The ancient Greeks believed the Universe always existed, and may have been correct.
It’s embarrassing for science that small z’s being used in designations so that Americans don’t have to cope with the capital letter sound of Z
Maybe we need to ask the universe in a louder and more visible way for answers to the questions we have. We deserve answers🎉
Stars galaxies 13 billion years ago
probably don’t exist now
The universe is probably infinite and has no beginning and no end, just chaos, collisions and explosions at different orders of magnitude.
When you humans finally figure out the nature and truth about the universe, you'll laugh your socks off. To paraphrase Douglas Adams. When people start to understand the universe of will instantly be replaced by something even more bizarre, inexplicable, and incomprehensible. This has already happened a number of times.
Yep. thank all the sheep that have been following directions and getting involved and occupied while they make use of everything they will not tell us for their sick agendas and whatever that would ruin their life and power
They talk in years which didn't exist then. Does time act differently if observed like it is now?
Fascinating.
understanding will have no effect . only response will give answers
We are still in the finding phase and we may never leave. What will happen, if there are sectors which are older than 13.8b years? With this the start of our known universe is one event among others. I tend to this, but it is only my personal assumption and it can also be total wrong. It is normal, that we correct models, this is the progress in science.
These galaxies are stragglers from the previous universe.
13.7 billion years is an honest number but it may not be true. Science is honest or it is not science. Let go of your fears.
Beautifully done video.
its ai generated breh
We can only see light 13.6 billion years old. Thus we think that to be the age of the universe. What if light goes through some aging process at that age limiting how far we can see? The universe could be way older.
We know this if the light is red or blue shifted due to doppler effect.
It’s our mortality that beacons us to have a ‘Beginning’ and an ‘End’. The universe has Always been here! 🤯 So we should just start trying to wrap our heads around the fact that there are something’s that we just CAN’T wrap our heads around. And it’s friggin’ Awesome! 🤩 🤩🤩
I agree with everything you say, except the universe has always been here but like you said we just don’t know
Two questions come to my mind concerning The Cosmic Expansion:
What causes the Expansion against massive Gravity?
If space is expanding and in the New vacuum space must be Quantum energy, doesn' it create energy like a Perpetuum mobile?
Can anyone help?
it’s a very good question that right now nobody can answer although some call it dark energy but nobody knows what that is.
If light bends, we obviously will never see the end of the universe, especially if it is infinite.
Maybe it will bend so much we will our own assholes
It’s not light that bends, but space. Light follows
It’s all pointless. Why search for life when we kill the world we have.
My wife likes to park there
HOW can Vacuums bend?
Flexible hoses!
What if we asked AI how old the universe is
the AI says the universe is opposite of what scientists are telling US. the scientists theories try to keep a 1 god religion happy.
Did big bang just go toward us or did it go 360 degrees
?
the more we know, the more we find out we don't know
Sounds like Homer Simpson
Every circle begins with its end. Reflection is key.
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
"Before I start, I must see my end. Destination known, my mind's journey now begins. Upon my chariot, heart and soul's fate revealed. In time, all points converge, hope's strength resteeled. But to earn final peace at the universe's endless refrain, we must see all in nothingness... before we start again."
🐲✨🐲✨🐲✨
--Diamond Dragons (series)
weird how nothing is faster than the speed of light, but we can look to the edge of the universe in an instant.
According to Einstein, or his theory, space itself can move faster than light.
The light is reaching us after 13 billion years. Those galaxies are long gone. It’s interesting to ponder how much of the standard model may be wrong.
@@billkeisling2907 50 or 60 years ago the existence of extremophiles would have been a laughable notion. Less than 100 years ago plate tectonics were not known about. The standard model only goes as far as the scientists have understood it so far.
Great Video, Thanks 👍🇺🇸 subbed.
Since when was an Epoch an Epic? Cow-towing to American English is so un scientific.
Never
I dont get how they can say the universe started at a point, when every direction you look, it all looks exactly the same right? Every patch of sky is full of galaxies, where was the starting point?
ua-cam.com/video/aT6K70TgdvY/v-deo.html
The big bang theory is not about a starting point, you are misinterpreting it. Imagine an ant walking on a rubber band while you stretch such band. No matter where the ant is, it will have to walk a greater distance to get from A to B if it waits too long, there is no "starting point". The big bang is about densities getting lower as space stretches in every direction, just like the rubber band
@@hagarbebado Thanks, that is interesting to think about. They always show these animations of the universe suddenly expanding from a point. And they say we a looking back in time.. So which ever way you look, you are looking back in time? It doesnt make any sense really. There has to be a start where everything is moving away from? If not then the universe is infinite and always has been.
@@R0B690 yes, you are correct in saying that whichever way you look you are looking back in time. But this is because light travels at a fixed speed, it would be true even in a static, non-expanding universe. I think animations show the universe emerge from a point because *our observable universe* is in fact a sphere centered around us, but our position has nothing special relative to any other positions (or at least that is the current scientific understanding)
No one knows. Maybe if they look in the opposite direction it would help.
They talk in years which didn't exist then. Does time act differently if observed like it is now?
There was no big bang. The JWST also proved that. Search for the video.
You can not not look over the horizon of the internal curved universe. Everywhere where you are is the centre. There was no big bang. The light loses energy in the form of frequency over a long time.
I know what I know and you can call John Snow. 😵💫 😶🌫️🫨
Pro tip: matter IS energy