Great pure science up to 1x10-43 seconds. During this point he throws out the most obvious point and provides 3 explanations even more radical. Physics 'breaking down' is not the most obvious explanation. You can't explain physics if what you use to calculate it doesn't exist yet. Einstein's theory perfectly predicts that space, time, and matter are interdependent. That's the 'physics' relationship we have. It's pretty obvious if you don't have one you don't have any. The most logical explanation is that there was nothing as we know it. No time, matter, or space. His concept of multiple universes is also most logical mathematically, but does not need to intercept with ours.
Well, it's not like they need to be misleading. They are a real science lab (I can confirm, I have family members working there) that actually works with these things.
The best science quote ever ( 02:42 ), "...That should impress the heck out of you. It still blows my mind, and it's what I do everyday...." - Dr. Don Lincoln
Chesky Stern it might also be a sin to say that we don’t know something when we clearly do! We do know what existed before or outside spacetime. You will see what I mean if you stop trying to make your way back to the beginning from within spacetime -when we know that the natural laws break down! Seriously that’s just being stupid. You can take yourself out of the universe one way. By finding the one solid thing that must have existed forever. Probability or probabilities. I explain the implications of this one foundation of reality in my video where I look hideous but Looks aren’t everything 😆🤷♀️ People are so sure that they don’t know but that’s patently ridiculous because you can take the whole universe as an experimental result in a way- and then we DO KNOW that there was the probability of the universe existing. We know that and that’s huge. Probability is prime. It exists without the universe. The implications of that are staggering. I explain in my video. Incidentally I am a scientist in the top 1% of IQ and I have thought about this one thing my whole life. I am not being contentious, flippant, or cute. I discuss these things with Nobel Prizewinners. He’s just wrong. ua-cam.com/video/wDiEMCPM7KA/v-deo.html
@@BadBoiFX let her express her opinions. You don't hold her mind and her conciousness. Why don't you just respect different people's views. Don't be an asshole, we're all Humans. Everybody has the right to express themselves.
My absolute favorite part of the video is the repetition of how "we dont know" and that it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence. Love it! There is no shame in not knowing - that's what science is all about!
Pretty cool since he’s a pretty chill dude ... don’t mind learning from him a little science if he can dig a little faith ... never know , he could learn a thing or two even though I’m pretty sure he’s much smarter than your average bear 😎
CosmoDeus Are they claiming they know something they don’t know or something YOU don’t know... or are they saying things for which there is evidence and suggesting hypothesis. what have they said is certainly factual that is not?
Not trying to be rude or offend whatsoever with this comment: Alot of good knowledge and content but I have a hard time getting over all those forced hand gestures. It's quite easy to tell when someone constantly overuses them, in this case, they became very distracting when they were added in randomly and at will, they just didn't match the script...looked very unnatural...
I have seen several of your videos and its always a joy to watch. You make the hard to understand much more understandable and even more interesting. Thanks for that.
The good news has once again come to you today. You can inherit the kingdom of God even if you are a sinner.. after all we are all sinners in God's standards of justice and holyness (he says that if a man looks at a woman with lust he has already committed adulterly with her in his heart NO MAN IS THAT PURE😅).....All you have to do is to honestly humbly pray repent turn away from sins (read the10 commandments) and trust that Jesus for his love❤❤ for you he left his throne in heaven and came to the world he was humbled humiliated betrayed beaten and killed for your sake to pay the fine of your sins and mine so that we won't spend our eternity in hell but with him in heaven...this might be the last time you read the gospel...Look around🔥🔥 be smart..the end is nigh🔥 ..He is coming back soooon not as the sacrificed lamb of God🐑..but as King of Kings🤴 the judge of the whole world..Your soul is on the line😭😭. Eternity is a long time.
@@keyboardevangelist1) How did you come to conclude that this god you've mentioned exists? 2) Couldn't others be as justified as you to propose a different explanation is responsible for all reality? Yes or no. 3) Will you admit there is no evidence that substantiates your conclusion? Yes it no. 4) Have you ever observed this god you've mentioned? Yes or no. 5) Will you admit that all that is known to be real can be observed? Yes or no.
"It's better to have questions you can't answer, than having answers you can't question" Edit: Quote from Richard Feyman, according to many commenters below.
@@D.NogueraMusic It goes even further. For many the "I do not know" is not an option. When you say to a creationist that you do not have an answer to a certain question they consider your whole argument invalid. Example, Evolution, tons of evidence but we do not know how Abiogenesis exactly works. Therefor, Evolution is rejected.
It's more like we know 1% of 100 but we say we got half of it figured out and they call that a theory and then supposedly use the scientific method... if you have 1% of knowledge in a subject no matter what you think you still don't know Jack schitt...
@@jamescaban7710 what we know, we know, what we don't, we don't. Not really sure how you can fault him for that. He is providing the only knowledge humans have been able to obtain about our universe and its existence so far.
Y. Tho - I’m not criticising him, what I said was true. I just think it’s more interesting when scientists talk about what they don’t know, since that’s when the juices of our imagination and innovation explode discovering. Also, when you understand what we don’t know, it’s pretty boring when a scientist starts telling you with great confidence what happened before the Big Bang.
A HUGE compliment to the presenter and people involved creating this video. It’s not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way. Not only that, the tempo and depth is just right, there’s no distracting music and the length of the video is just perfect. Looking forward learning more.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@Jeroen De Cloe "It's not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way." That's true when someone's just trying to explain something difficult. Like a rocket engineer trying to explain how all the many facets involved in the mechanics of a rocket work together to produce a rocket that does what it's designed to do. That would be very difficult to explain in an easy way. But Dr Logan, I think it was, he's trying to explain the impossible. There is no scientific method in his description. There's no science that could reveal anything about what happened before creation came into being. And the big bang model defies the laws of physics, logic, the scientific method and common sense. Apparently, this fantasy club actually believe they represent Christ. Far from it. Christ taught us to trust God's word. Not change it, amend it, manipulate it, to conform with the secular ideologies of big bangs, billions of years, evolution, etc. When, and for how long the creation event took is clearly written in the book of Genesis, and specifically, the King James version. What God's word teaches is clear. The only question is do you believe God's word or man's best guesses? Because this guy is not teaching science aka observed, tested, repeatable knowledge. He's choosing what seems most reasonable, and aligns best with the modern secular concessions. Literally, you have to presume the big bang happened before compiling various theories about when and how it happened, what was happening prior to it, what caused it, etc. Without your initial assumption that it happened, there is nothing to extrapolate upon. That means it's all fantasy. So, you tell me... What, exactly, have you actually learned from examining a long list of previous fantasies? And if you're a Christian, believe Christ. He created the world as is, in six days, approximately 6000 years ago. Personally, I chose to believe God's word... At least until it can be proven wrong. And His word, as always, has proven to be, by far, the most scientifically sustainable model of the universe's origin and creation. No model that begins with "billions of years ago" stands up to objective scrutiny. Just the observation of the many clues just inside this solar system defy and debunk that model... Dinosaur fossils, and fossils in general, have been proven to be but a few thousand years old, by numerous examples of the actual application of the scientific method. Evolutionists have only one good reason to deny science every time it defies evolution. They prefer to believe there is no Creator. But Christians don't have any good reason to deny both God and science. Peer pressure is not a good reason, btw. Leave God out of it and just stand by the actual unbiased, objective, tested and repeated observable facts. Bio matter has a half-life of about 520 years, tops. Period. End of discussion. Rescuing devises are not how science moves forward. The bible, ancient textual human history, archeology, fossils, and the objectivity of the scientific method, just to name a few, all favor God's word, at all times, and in all things. But Christians need to learn to trust God... At least until His word has been demonstrably proven wrong. If anyone could have done that, there would be no bible. It's loaded from top to bottom, side to side, cover to cover with specific people, places, things, times, dates, prophecies, world renowned events, and more... If it was all made up, it would be the easiest thing in the world to debunk.
@@mitchellc4 And yet there is no credible evidence backing that up. God is a MYTH, and the entire story of "jesus" is taken from several earlier "pagan" religions.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@Mike Doonsebury There a difference between Knowledge, Belief, Scientific Hypothesis, and a Scientific Theory. If you understood the difference, you wouldn't have posted your comment. Far too many people think a scientific hypothesis when stated, is something that scientists know to be true, or are asserting to be true. No, it's only a possibility they have reason to believe MAY be true, and do not have any verifiable evidence for it yet.
@@KrustyKlown What you just stated is the Definition of a Theory. This guy in this video is stating as fact. That is falsifying evidence, in the name of Consensus Science. To me looses all credibility. Even with a Dr. at the beginning of his name.
I love how Dr. Lincoln explains these things. The available information is very well presented. If he was my teacher when I was much younger I almost certainly would have gone into theoretical physics, the wonderment of science. Amazing.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
Just want to say, I appreciate that there are men and women out there like Dr. Lincoln who are dedicating their lives to unraveling life's greatest mystery.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
this has been answered in 2019 paper by Neurokinetikz..I Dunno why these scientists keep persisting on WE DUNNO.. it's simple..dig in and get enlightened.. Theoretical Implications Either the universe has the properties of a hologram. Or the hologram has the properties of a universe. What is the Universe? The universe is a black hole. And every black hole is a universe. The big bang is the collapse of our black hole into a singularity, creating a universe in its interior. The universe is a black hole contained in a parent universe with the same laws of physics and other black holes. The 7th dimension of string theory is the plane of possible universes with the same laws of physics but different initial conditions.
This voice felt so familiar after listening to "The Theory of Everything" on Audible! Checking the professor's name both here and there clarified that it was not just a coincidence, but I never pictured the mustache. 😁 Great lectures!
@@daieast6305 It's below everybody's pay grade, but I still wish someone would tell him, but then he thinks he knows everything better than everybody else. Maybe only his own daughter could tell him, he seems to listen to her.
I'm a fairly intelligent person holding bachelor degrees in biology (with a minor in chemistry), medical technology, and nursing, in that order. I'm a retired R.N. about 10 years now. In all that schooling, I thereby have an almost total science background. Out of all that science, I've only had 2 courses in physics that didn't require calculus. Those 2 courses would be Physical Chemistry, which are the booger bears of physics courses! I guess that explains why I was only able to fully comprehend his concepts. I really need to go back and watch the video again to try to comprehend those parts that went over my head! To be honest, I was humbled by this presentation. I rarely run across anything I read or see that goes completely over my head. 🤔
It goes over your head because it's complete 🐂 It's intended to be incomprehensible so you will buy into their religious dogma and they can get more funding.
It's usually something that is often said by liars actually - otherwise why would they feel the need to say it - other than to reassure the gullible...
@@HamhocksUnlimited I'm trying to work out if you are a troll or just uneducated (I suspect its the latter). Its perfectly reasonable and entirely honest to say there exists a consensus if indeed a consensus does exist. There are many scientific explanations for which there is indisputably a consensus. Biological evolution and the Big Bang are two such examples. It may be that you personally don't like those explanations because (perhaps) they conflict with your preferred religious narrative, but it is demonstrably true that they represent the scientific consensus on those issues.
The problem is that we only have a small sample size, taken over a tiny period of time, and from one infinitesimally small spot in the universe. Our perspective is fixed, and we have to make many assumptions based only on the tiny snippets of information we can collect at that point. It's like sampling the air one inch above the ground outside your front door for a week, and then trying to describe the whole of the Earth's atmosphere in minute detail, just from those readings. Yet even with millions of weather measurements taken around the globe every day, dozens of weather satellites in orbit, and vast amounts of computing power running simulations, we still don't have the granularity to accurately predict the exact conditions at that one spot at any point in time. Now imagine this on a universal scale.
The Big bang .was different when the deep infra red james webb telescope shook up the science tists when they did not see what they thought they should see
I love that you use 'Centigrade'. I still do it, but then change it to 'Celsius' because I don't think anybody will know what I'm talking about nowadays.
@Larry Chappell The elephant in the room is that before the big bang there was nothing (no time, no space, no mass, no energy). Genesis 1:1 - In the beginning God created... The physical laws of time and space, and the relationship of mass and energy, and all atomic values defined in the first microsecond. Since God created them he operated outside those parameters and is in no way limited by them in any way. So what was before the big bang we can never know...until we die and then it won't matter. Apparently the universe is a one-time event. It was created, will exist for a period of time (approximately 145 billion years) then the "Big Rip" will end it all with all mass reduced to sub-atomic particles and be rolled up like a scroll.
@@spyeatte So Genesis is your science textbook? The flood Tower of Babel Adam and Eve Talking serpents The Nephili The children of God mating with the daughters of men etc. Are part of your science curriculum?
@@spyeatte here is why religion is so toxic to people. They think Pretending to know the unknown is knowing and make unsubstantiated claims is virtuous as long as its made in the name of diety and religion
@@karnobot9814 Yep. They try to explain stuff that can be explained with science, given time, with some crazy idea of an all powerful being creating everything and when they’re is a legit good point against religion they point to faith
Bro, were you really listening to him? "Everything after 10 to the minus 13 seconds is solidly known.". This man believes that he knows solidly how the universe was created back to the very first second. He's so narcissistic, that he says they don't exactly know what happened from time 0 to 10^-13 seconds, but what they think is sensible speculation. After 10^13 seconds? Oh no, that's not speculation. He just knows. I have no problem with the theory. It may be true. It may not be. Personally, I think the odds of them actually being correct are astronomical (no pun intended). My problem is the insane amount of arrogance to basically just take this theory as complete fact. Actually, I don't think he "basically" takes it as fact. I'm pretty sure he completely takes this as fact, and a done deal. Which again, I have no problem with him believing that either. I wished he would just acknowledge it as a belief. A very strong belief.
@@mpersand If you listen near the end he states that what we presently know might not be correct at all so that negates your "narcissistic" comment, but then again it takes one to know one 🤪
Why does science think we are the ONLY "BIG BANG" out their in infinite space? Travel fast enough and far enough and you will run into other big bang zones forever and ever.
@@mpersand Unless you know more than anyone else on this subject matter, of few "evidences" that we currently have of Big Bang theory, a couple of them are CBR and red shifts - which raises more question of validity of the claim than actually being evidences. What we can all agree is that - there are so many things we do not know - and perhaps will never know, about the universe.
When I was a kid, one of my classmates used to argue that our universe (and its expansion) is simply the other side of some other parallel universe's black hole. We debated and argued over this idea throughout the fifth grade.
As the saying goes: "If you can't show it, you don't know it." I will admit I've had the same idea myself, and it's a fun one, but there's problems about the questions of energy quantity and why black holes don't seem to lose any coherent level of mass, although the search for Hawking radiation is still on.
that's the holographic principle, based on information thought to be imprinted on a black hole's event horizon, which was established as the solution to the information paradox by stephen hawking i think. Then speculation arose that the same thing could apply to our whole universe, all the universe as information imprinted on a two dimensional hologram, either encircling our universe or imprinted on a black hole's event horizon. This encouraged further speculation taking the idea to its most extreme conclusion-the simulation hypothesis. Holographic principle though merely speculative is way more sensible than the latter. But that's only relatively speaking. They are both fringe ideas. Indeed two experiments have been done to test for the holographic principle, one was to test for the equivalent of pixels in the structure of space-time. If this is holographic, then space will be pixelated. However so far no pixelation has been found. Another experiment, this one non lab based, used telescopes to measure the journey of different types of electromagnetic waves, specifically if space-time is not a smooth membrane like medium, then Fermi's LAT would have detected a significant time lag between the arrival of the lowest-energy and highest-energy gamma rays. In fact, to within one part in 100 million billion, the two photons traveled at the same speed. Many approaches to new theories of gravity picture space-time as having a shifting, frothy structure at physical scales trillions of times smaller than an electron. Some models predict that the foamy aspect of space-time will cause higher-energy gamma rays to move slightly more slowly than photons at lower energy. Such a model would violate Einstein's edict that all electromagnetic radiation -- radio waves, infrared, visible light, X-rays and gamma rays -- travels through a vacuum at the same speed. Fermi showed that pixelation or rough 'texture' in space-time may not exist at all. So far the smoothness of the space-time continuum has been confirmed. So that's NO to the holographic principle or simulation hypothesis. It confirms the aether/vacuum conventional idea, supported by Einstein and his predecessors which describes spacetime as euclidean. However all this fringe speculation, especially occupying populist 'science' circles, started with the information paradox black hole problem, which I'm not satisfied is solved, and I don't even think it's that great a problem-energy can't be created or destroyed, information can't be lost. These rules may not apply in extreme situations e.g. at the high energy and temperatures just after time equals zero st the big bang our laws of physics did not apply. And similarly things break down in black holes-which are the most extreme predictions derived from General relativity's mathematics-all the tensor and vector calculus. the schwarzschild metric and the kerr metric describes the physics of black holes, and it's pretty crazy,the maths says in a kerr black hole you can visit your own past. Black holes spin space and time. All real black holes are spinning black holes. The angular momentum of the star thay collapsed, plus the material the black hole devows, even at a quantum level, the angular momentum of every fermion and boson means black holes always rotate. A paper in the astrophysical journal detailed how gamma ray bursts seem to produce superluminal motion, with superluminal gamma waves being time reversed.. gamma ray burst only happen in very extreme cosmological events and therefore are another example of where our laws of physics may break down to produce faster than light travel through space under that unique condition. iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3bdf
It doesn't make sense cause what would've caused that universe. And then that universe and then that and then that and then that universe. There must be a beginning
Pretty cool dialog for 5th graders! In 5th grade I spent most of my time avoiding cooties and trying to figure out why those creatures called girls were starting to be interesting!
amazing explanations on mind boggling theories. thank you. I started learning and don't intend to stop. ive always wanted to learn about this stuff. , physics and chemistry so that when someone asks me what i know i can finally say I know about .. literally..everything. 🤓
I may have to listen to this video 100 before I absorb all of its content. He communicates EXTREMEMY well; but single sentences often contain 3 or more complex ideas that have to be understood individually before connecting them together so as to grasp the meaning of the entire sentence. Each successive sentence then builds upon what preceded it. It's a struggle for me but an immensely rewarding one.
You can’t get behind that event .... even under the influence of LSD or your mind altering of choice ,,, you can’t get behind that singular moment ... hint would be .... it’s not the speed of light goofy , it’s the speed of sound ..... duh .. he said ... let there be
Yes!!! Now. I give 10:1 odds that the view is at least 10x "bigger" than before. Zo send me your bet & I will start an escrow account to cover it. O...BTW, there R so many shibboleths in this BS video that I will refuse to accept wagers from those of you who believe any of the absurdities claimed about all that BS about what exists beyond what real science can study (etc.).
"Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:" Isaiah 42:5 "Which commandeth the sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars. 8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea. 9 Which maketh Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades, and the chambers of the south. 10 Which doeth great things past finding out; yea, and wonders without number." Job 9:7-10 Also search; Isaiah 45:12: Isaiah 40:22: And John 1:1-5 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not." Also John 3:16-18
Things we do know. Assuming. Well, at one time people KNEW if you traveled to far you could fall off the edge of the earth, assuming the world was flat. Also the earth was the center of all there was. What is truth today can be rubbish tomorrow with new discoveries. The best we can do is Assume we are correct.
Our universe on my wild guess was a product of a very large black hole which reach its maximum compression of singularity causing it to explode as the big bang.
Well, since he’s speaking of a point in TIME at 10 to the -48 seconds, in other words pretty effing early in the history of the universe, I think it could also be said, “You’re so fresh the laws of physics don’t apply to you! “ Just another scientifically observed option...
Not only "We don't know," but "We probably _can't_ ever know." The Bang had already presumably happened, and expansion was already underway at the earliest point our observations can tell us anything concrete. Anything _anyone_ has to say on the actual _origin_ of the matter, energy, space, and time involved in that expansion, whether the person be of secular persuasion or theological, is a matter taken on the basis of neither empiricism nor rationalism. That leaves faith. (and before anyone claims that he uses rationalism in the video, yes, he does, but only up to the point where physics becomes meaningless. Before that, he openly admits that there is only speculation, with no actual data).
@@ketchup5344, changing the topic, why? It's about whether the big bang happened or not. If there is or not a "sky engineer" how can that prove the existence of the big bang?
Thank you for another great physics video! During most of your videos you are standing in front of a black board with all kinds of calculations, that really intrigue me. I know the black board is primarily for show. But, I wonder if you would consider discussing the black board and some of the equations that are pertinent?
That would require imagining that the viewer is capable of thinking beyond the surface of things, and that is just something that isn't done in the case of videos like these. It's much easier to provide the appearance of teaching, than it is to actually TEACH.
@@davidwayne8336 Claiming to know the answer to something isn’t disreputable in and of itself. It’s the answer you seem to have a bias against, and therefore a hostility that lowers your respect for any theist. But there are perfectly reasonable reasons why we believe God caused the Big Bang, such as the first mover argument. Or the uncaused cause
@@alexamaya3208 Don’t take that guy as an example for all thiests. Believe it or not some of us think they’re may be something after death, we just don’t believe in a particular god.
@@davidwayne8336 But only from unbelievers. We can share the Gospel but only a fool says there is no God. That is from Psalms. And if we share, that person's salvation is not our responsibility. It is between that person and God, not between me and the unbeliever. So you see, I am commanded to share the gospel but not responsible. You are neither, but insist on demanding believers betray Jesus Christ. I pray you come to recognize His call.
@RDE Lutherie mhm that' why whe don't even know shit about stuff like dark matter and energy and we basically find every several days stuff or bodies in the universe that shouldn't exist the way they do regarding our theories. Not saying it's all crap but oh boy we are so far away from knowing anything.
@@herrschmidt5477 Scientists know a lot, but the human race is very young. There's stuff we don't even know to question yet, let alone have any answers to. If there is any such thing, we'd have to become gods ourselves to know everything, and we probably still wouldn't.
@@bjknuckles7873 so he's talking like any other scientists who talks about the subject, you're just push a bs view you have of other scientists you don't agree with that tend to be atheistic
@@j.wick6666 no just the ones that are arrogantly dogmatic. you do realize not all scientists agree about everything. and there are some who are overly high on their opinion, which is often a scientistic opinion and not a scientific one.
I just can't get past how the universe went from something the size of a pinhead to enough volume to make up all the matter we no of and all the rest we haven't seen yet. Great video btw.
Dr. Don Lincoln, this by far the best video I have ever seen on the big bang theory & quite opening when you mentioned that we do not know what was universe like at time = zero & I guess 10th -43 secs.
I don't know why I watch these videos that talk about this specific "what came before" subject expecting an answer. Regardless of how interesting and how well they answer this question, the answer is inevitably going to be the same: we just don't know. It is amazing that they know as much as they do.
Actually there's a very great deal we do know, and it's not flattering. Einstein said: "thermodynamics is the one theory of universal content which will never be overthrown". Arthur Eddington made Einstein Einstein. He said: "if your theory challenges thermodynamics there is no hope for you other than total humiliation". These theorists, well-intentioned or other(Brian Greene), put bread on their table with their theories. NO ONE grants $$$ to respond to, "we don't know and there's every reason to think we never will". So reasonably they HAVE to propose hypotheses. But NOTHING is suggested that doesn't conflict prima facie with thermodynamics. 1st Law disallows heat from cold: this universe of heat from "nothing"(cold). 2nd Law demands that heat goes only to cold: this universe of heat would have distributed to cold if eternal....it has not so it's not eternal. NOTICE NONE of them EVER refer to a reconciliation with thermodynamics. NOT because they don't have it...OF COURSE THEY DON'T. But because NO ONE EVER voices the words; "thermodynamics is wrong". It's the clergy saying "there's no God"; THEIR JOB IS OVER!! (some clown will suggest quantum physics; QM can NEVER conflict with "conservation laws".)
Don Lincoln here did not properly explain what actually occurred before existence expanded out of the singularity. The singularity is where/when all this existence was merged into, you got it, a "singularity". What is this singularity? This is energy at its maximum level of intensity, an infinite level of intensity. It is not possible to go beyond an infinite/maximum level of energy which is why we can logically conclude the singularity does not have a beginning. As existence expands, the level of energy decreases, and will continue decreasing until its minimum level of intensity, even if it takes an eternity to get there.
@@WayneLynch69 but, how do you really know? You put your trust in what you read. How do you really know that's what Einstein actually said? He may be fiction. I know it seems to all make sense but, how can we really know.?
Matter can't be created from nothing but at one time it was. Our brains are not equipped to deal with this type of problem. There is something out there that we are completly blind to. We need more than the 5 senses that we have.
The question I’ve always been interested in is “how long was there nothing before there was something?” It’s probably more philosophical than anything.
Matter can't be created from nothing but at one time it was. Our brains are not equipped to deal with this type of problem. There is something out there that we are completly blind to. We need more than the 5 senses that we have.
@@picanto12 Matter can't be created from nothing but at one time it was. Our brains are not equipped to deal with this type of problem. There is something out there that we are completly blind to. We need more than the 5 senses that we have.
I believe, when there was nothing, there still was something, somewhere else. Like cause and effect. There was never just nothing. And at the same time, there was something, at least to the observer.
The quantum simulation computer was switched to the on position. And before that... The quantum, quantum simulation, simulation computer was switched on. And before that, God was still asleep after a crazy party....
God explains how he made all things . Test His Word and see whether it aligns with what is true or not. The Big Bang is not how all life began . Entropy disproves the hypothesis.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
Mitchell C if Jesus did did exist (I’m not saying he did or doesn’t) I’m fairly sure he wouldn’t encourage you spamming people while they here listening and learning.
I love these videos, as it gets me thinking about the universe, and just how complex everything is! I wish I had paid more attention at school, especially to the science classes
I paid attention in school, but the basic highschool fysics was pretty hard for me, so I give all the credit to Dr. Lincoln explaining this much more complicated stuff in such a way I can follow it.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM! Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21 Jesus said the Father is the only true God! John 17 3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
I loved the way Dr Lincoln presented this fascinating tutorial. It was knowledgeable without being over-complicated and enthusiastic without being hysterical! A moment in time that is 1 to the minus 43 of a second is just as incomprehensible to me as the concept of all the universe being “not quite zero-sized” haha that could have come from Python! However I asked this question of a genuine astrophysicist myself some years ago and am prompted to ask it again ask again “WHERE was this super-dense, super-hot, super-tiny particle at the time?” Being a fan of the old Marvel comics stories that often drew in the universes within universes, I have this vision of alien scientists looking at a slide in an electron microscope billions of years ago and one, recoiling from a blinding flash in his viewfinder turns to his puzzled colleagues and drily says “We’re gonna need a bigger lab” Great stuff ! I’m subscribed!
@@eekay5710 how is the subject matter being discussed here in any way “nonsense”? And more importantly, what the heck does a religious fiction book like “The Shack” have to do with ANYthing being talked about here? That would be like a medical doctor having their palm “read” in order to better understand how to perform surgery on a patient. If you want to see someone who is truly “subscribed to nonsense”, all you need to do is look in a mirror 🪞
Alan - I have the same question…WHERE was this super small, super dense piece of matter? If this tiny ball of matter existed, in what medium (if any) did it exist in? It’s a mind-boggling concept to try and get your head around. Did you ever get a satisfactory answer to the question?
OR, most of you brainiacs out there could just wait until you die when all answers will be revealed to you by God. No? Not buying that one? Didn’t think so. And don’t ask me to prove God exists. Because you can’t prove that any of this is correct. Maybe some but not all. Just perhaps they are one in the same. How you like those apples? And no, I’m not much into religion, just offering a different perspective is all. But that debate has been going on for years and years. Again, just a grain of sand in the vast desert we call space. Nothing more important than a piece of lint.
I know none of the math, but I love all of the information. Fascinating. I listen to every o e of these. My mind constantly thinks about all of the information. Thank You.
In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. Science will hopefully understand that they can't figure some things out because it is beyond human comprehension.
@@silknfeathers your problem might be a problem of semantics. The word 'God' might be used with the most varied of meanings of all words. Think about what this video attempts to contemplate: what is before the beginning of the universe, and even is the cause of the universe? Do we yet have a word for it? Start with a brand new word; and give it an initial meaning, such as: that which exists independently from and causes our known universe of space, time, matter, and energy. Then, by way of logic and reason, describe the attributes which are necessary for such a 'thing' to be accurately defined as such. If it exists independently of time, then it is timeless. If it exists independently of space, then it is omnipresent. If it exists while there is no matter, then it is immaterial. If it causes the beginning of all known energy and matter, then it is omnipotent. If it exists timelessly yet causes at a time, it might be considered agency. If it causes all that is known it is omniscient. Keep going. One can come up with a few more logically necessary attributes. Then you can call it what you want. You can even recognize that some people are already using a word for this. Maybe they are importing more meaning ascribed to that word than some people find comfortable. It's semantics, at that point. Or you can take the view that you don't like any of the logical conclusions about the necessary attributes, and choose instead to believe that 'nothing' could precede (or co-exist with) the moment of creation, but that is logically absurd.
Dr. Don Lincoln - Thank You!!!! I'm watching your Great Courses Series... I find it just awesome that folks like Dr. Don care enough to take the time to "translate" this cool knowledge and information to the proletarians... Sooo cool... I'm hooked... forget rock stars... and actors... Don is the real star!!! thanks!
Did you know God created the world? Did you also know a guy named Georges Lemaître, (1894-1966), Belgian cosmologist, Catholic priest came up with the idea of a big bang theory? The definition of ( theory ) is- a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. "Darwin's theory of evolution is also just and idea some man had. In the 1920's is when the idea happen, and it's weird because he was a priest and if he read the Bible it says on the first page God created the world. Unless he didn't really believe the Bible and is one of the people the Bible talks about being a wolf in sheep's clothing deceiving people and causing confusion. Most people don't believe the Bible because they say it was written by man and it's wrong but instead some go and believe in nothing or in evolution and the big bang or both those together without the thought of God creating the world... Did you know the Bible says there's a number for man and it's the same number as the beast and the number is 666? How did someone thousands of years ago know that the number of man was 666 without DNA testing or the technology you'd need to know that? Because humans have carbon-12 in them which is made up of 6 protons 6 electrons and 6 neutrons and also Jesus and Lucifer where referred to as stars in the Bible and stars too also have carbon-12. How can they possibly know this information unless they where given the knowledge. But with all the confusion and lies in the world through time people lost the truth. Now we have people believing in other man's words about life and creation of earth and humans when they truly don't know and the Bible is the answer to those questions without a doubt if you are wide enough to understand what it says which everyone should because God is not the author of confusion... We all need to put are faith and trust back into God and his only begotten son Jesus Christ. For God so loved the world he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth on him will not perish but have everlasting life He died on the cross and rose again to save us all from sin cause by the devil. Peace and love to everyone who reads this. JESUS IS THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE NO ONE CAN GET TO THE FATHER BUT BY HIM.
I love to watch scientists explain things about the universe that can't be proven in our life time. Maybe in a few generations we'll probably be able to if the human race will still be around that is.
No one can explain where the original energy that caused the big bang came from.I think it always existed because there is no begining only cycles of birth and death of everything including our planet,sun,etc.
Sometimes I think we're inside of a black hole giving ua the illusion that space is expanding but actually shrinking from the forces of the black hole...shit this weed is good.
something my older brother said once was " the universe is microscopic and we live at the singularity of an infinitely collapsing black hole." probably not true, but i the sentiment.
The trouble with us shrinking is that EM radiation wouldn't be affected - meaning we'd start going blind as the sun puts out the same frequencies while our eyes shrink too small to see them.
Finally a good science channel with 0 clickbait. Great job, please stay awesome.
I agree just pure science without the hype.
Unlike that Bint hoffennhuer
and it's not for the lack of opportunity. 11:10 proves me right.
Great pure science up to 1x10-43 seconds. During this point he throws out the most obvious point and provides 3 explanations even more radical. Physics 'breaking down' is not the most obvious explanation. You can't explain physics if what you use to calculate it doesn't exist yet. Einstein's theory perfectly predicts that space, time, and matter are interdependent. That's the 'physics' relationship we have. It's pretty obvious if you don't have one you don't have any. The most logical explanation is that there was nothing as we know it. No time, matter, or space. His concept of multiple universes is also most logical mathematically, but does not need to intercept with ours.
Well, it's not like they need to be misleading. They are a real science lab (I can confirm, I have family members working there) that actually works with these things.
The best science quote ever ( 02:42 ), "...That should impress the heck out of you. It still blows my mind, and it's what I do everyday...." - Dr. Don Lincoln
WHAT QUOTE IS IT ? TEXT ME BACK.
"It's not a sin to not know something. It's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't"
- Dr. Don Lincoln
Chesky Stern it might also be a sin to say that we don’t know something when we clearly do! We do know what existed before or outside spacetime. You will see what I mean if you stop trying to make your way back to the beginning from within spacetime -when we know that the natural laws break down! Seriously that’s just being stupid. You can take yourself out of the universe one way. By finding the one solid thing that must have existed forever. Probability or probabilities. I explain the implications of this one foundation of reality in my video where I look hideous but Looks aren’t everything 😆🤷♀️
People are so sure that they don’t know but that’s patently ridiculous because you can take the whole universe as an experimental result in a way- and then we DO KNOW that there was the probability of the universe existing. We know that and that’s huge. Probability is prime. It exists without the universe. The implications of that are staggering. I explain in my video. Incidentally I am a scientist in the top 1% of IQ and I have thought about this one thing my whole life. I am not being contentious, flippant, or cute. I discuss these things with Nobel Prizewinners. He’s just wrong.
ua-cam.com/video/wDiEMCPM7KA/v-deo.html
@@BadBoiFX let her express her opinions. You don't hold her mind and her conciousness. Why don't you just respect different people's views. Don't be an asshole, we're all Humans. Everybody has the right to express themselves.
@@BadBoiFX and, likewise, no one asked for your comment.
Misconceptions aren't sins.
@@spiralsun1 BS nonsense!
Amazing! This was such a consumable video! So reasonably timed, and well explained. Very, very fascinating!
I love how he does this so we can learn and not the money cause he has no ads
same mans a hero
I would imagine he already has a decent amount of money in the bank.
yep I definitely appreciate that
@@jacksonlarson6099 maybe but has that ever stopped people grabbing every possible $?
@Brad Watson Ha ha ha ha. I want some of those drugs you are taking.
My absolute favorite part of the video is the repetition of how "we dont know" and that it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence. Love it! There is no shame in not knowing - that's what science is all about!
"... it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence." Please tell that to Fox "News." And the President.
". . .arrogantly proclaim something without evidence."
This is what annoys the hell out of me about Brian Cox and Michio Kaku.
@@RME76048 Quote, "I know this, and I'm a smart guy!" Sheesh!!
Pretty cool since he’s a pretty chill dude ... don’t mind learning from him a little science if he can dig a little faith ... never know , he could learn a thing or two even though I’m pretty sure he’s much smarter than your average bear 😎
CosmoDeus Are they claiming they know something they don’t know or something YOU don’t know... or are they saying things for which there is evidence and suggesting hypothesis. what have they said is certainly factual that is not?
Don, the only complaint I have about your videos is a very serious one and it's something you should seriously consider. There's not enough of them.
Not trying to be rude or offend whatsoever with this comment:
Alot of good knowledge and content but I have a hard time getting over all those forced hand gestures. It's quite easy to tell when someone constantly overuses them, in this case, they became very distracting when they were added in randomly and at will, they just didn't match the script...looked very unnatural...
@@ajcook7777 I think he oversimplifies things a bit for me..
The hand gestures are a good facet to presentation.
I'm just glad he doesn't misrepresent science like so many other channels out there.
Can someone give the content of this video in a short note.
@@Pravinkumar-zv7ww yes
I have seen several of your videos and its always a joy to watch.
You make the hard to understand much more understandable and even more interesting.
Thanks for that.
So nice to hear a lecture without background music. Thank you.
Yes I agree ditch the music - it's noise and doesn't help
Same as with porn! A refreshing change, thank you Fermilab. 🖖🏼
The good news has once again come to you today. You can inherit the kingdom of God even if you are a sinner.. after all we are all sinners in God's standards of justice and holyness (he says that if a man looks at a woman with lust he has already committed adulterly with her in his heart NO MAN IS THAT PURE😅).....All you have to do is to honestly humbly pray repent turn away from sins (read the10 commandments) and trust that Jesus for his love❤❤ for you he left his throne in heaven and came to the world he was humbled humiliated betrayed beaten and killed for your sake to pay the fine of your sins and mine so that we won't spend our eternity in hell but with him in heaven...this might be the last time you read the gospel...Look around🔥🔥 be smart..the end is nigh🔥 ..He is coming back soooon not as the sacrificed lamb of God🐑..but as King of Kings🤴 the judge of the whole world..Your soul is on the line😭😭. Eternity is a long time.
lecture WITH background music is a show, not lecture.
@@keyboardevangelist1) How did you come to conclude that this god you've mentioned exists?
2) Couldn't others be as justified as you to propose a different explanation is responsible for all reality? Yes or no.
3) Will you admit there is no evidence that substantiates your conclusion? Yes it no.
4) Have you ever observed this god you've mentioned? Yes or no.
5) Will you admit that all that is known to be real can be observed? Yes or no.
"It's better to have questions you can't answer, than having answers you can't question"
Edit:
Quote from Richard Feyman, according to many commenters below.
42
Science vs Religion?
@@MikeStoddart it doesnt have to be a versus. Science, philosophy and religion can become dogmatic for the people who can't admit "I don't know."
Moron!
@@D.NogueraMusic It goes even further. For many the "I do not know" is not an option. When you say to a creationist that you do not have an answer to a certain question they consider your whole argument invalid.
Example, Evolution, tons of evidence but we do not know how Abiogenesis exactly works. Therefor, Evolution is rejected.
Ironically he gets my attention when he says, “there are some things we don’t know.” That’s probably the most accurate statement in his discussion!
Yes!!!!
It's more like we know 1% of 100 but we say we got half of it figured out and they call that a theory and then supposedly use the scientific method... if you have 1% of knowledge in a subject no matter what you think you still don't know Jack schitt...
Awesome comment
@@jamescaban7710 what we know, we know, what we don't, we don't. Not really sure how you can fault him for that. He is providing the only knowledge humans have been able to obtain about our universe and its existence so far.
Y. Tho - I’m not criticising him, what I said was true. I just think it’s more interesting when scientists talk about what they don’t know, since that’s when the juices of our imagination and innovation explode discovering. Also, when you understand what we don’t know, it’s pretty boring when a scientist starts telling you with great confidence what happened before the Big Bang.
In high school, I lit up a cherry bomb and heard a big bang. Then I joined the Army, went to Vietnam, and heard a really big bang. How big you talkin?
A HUGE compliment to the presenter and people involved creating this video. It’s not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way. Not only that, the tempo and depth is just right, there’s no distracting music and the length of the video is just perfect.
Looking forward learning more.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@@mitchellc4 do you have evidence that any of this actually happened?
@@mitchellc4 Yikes!!
@Jeroen De Cloe
"It's not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way."
That's true when someone's just trying to explain something difficult.
Like a rocket engineer trying to explain how all the many facets involved in the mechanics of a rocket work together to produce a rocket that does what it's designed to do.
That would be very difficult to explain in an easy way.
But Dr Logan, I think it was, he's trying to explain the impossible.
There is no scientific method in his description. There's no science that could reveal anything about what happened before creation came into being.
And the big bang model defies the laws of physics, logic, the scientific method and common sense.
Apparently, this fantasy club actually believe they represent Christ.
Far from it. Christ taught us to trust God's word. Not change it, amend it, manipulate it, to conform with the secular ideologies of big bangs, billions of years, evolution, etc.
When, and for how long the creation event took is clearly written in the book of Genesis, and specifically, the King James version.
What God's word teaches is clear.
The only question is do you believe God's word or man's best guesses?
Because this guy is not teaching science aka observed, tested, repeatable knowledge.
He's choosing what seems most reasonable, and aligns best with the modern secular concessions.
Literally, you have to presume the big bang happened before compiling various theories about when and how it happened, what was happening prior to it, what caused it, etc.
Without your initial assumption that it happened, there is nothing to extrapolate upon.
That means it's all fantasy.
So, you tell me... What, exactly, have you actually learned from examining a long list of previous fantasies?
And if you're a Christian, believe Christ. He created the world as is, in six days, approximately 6000 years ago.
Personally, I chose to believe God's word... At least until it can be proven wrong.
And His word, as always, has proven to be, by far, the most scientifically sustainable model of the universe's origin and creation.
No model that begins with "billions of years ago" stands up to objective scrutiny.
Just the observation of the many clues just inside this solar system defy and debunk that model...
Dinosaur fossils, and fossils in general, have been proven to be but a few thousand years old, by numerous examples of the actual application of the scientific method.
Evolutionists have only one good reason to deny science every time it defies evolution. They prefer to believe there is no Creator.
But Christians don't have any good reason to deny both God and science.
Peer pressure is not a good reason, btw.
Leave God out of it and just stand by the actual unbiased, objective, tested and repeated observable facts.
Bio matter has a half-life of about 520 years, tops. Period. End of discussion.
Rescuing devises are not how science moves forward.
The bible, ancient textual human history, archeology, fossils, and the objectivity of the scientific method, just to name a few, all favor God's word, at all times, and in all things.
But Christians need to learn to trust God...
At least until His word has been demonstrably proven wrong.
If anyone could have done that, there would be no bible.
It's loaded from top to bottom, side to side, cover to cover with specific people, places, things, times, dates, prophecies, world renowned events, and more...
If it was all made up, it would be the easiest thing in the world to debunk.
@@mitchellc4 And yet there is no credible evidence backing that up. God is a MYTH, and the entire story of "jesus" is taken from several earlier "pagan" religions.
I really appreciate that he's able to say "we don't know". It gives "us" (these geniuses) something to work on.
Him: "I don;t know. Therefore, I'm right." Nope.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@@mitchellc4 nope genius, thats not it...
Lol my son asked me this question. I said "The Big Date".
Ahhh haha I saw what you did, good job there I saw what you did 😂
If he ever asks what will happen after you can say, most likely The Big Breakup :p
@@Morrodin182 and then the great depression state
@@Morrodin182 what a lame joke
@@dylantrost4471 The joke is less lame than your comment though, so I guess you are the whiner eh winner >.>
I haven't heard that put so simply and clearly before. Thank you! Dr Lincoln
He is so so wrong
I respect the fact that you won't lie about y'all not knowing.
there already are far too many people with sacred books full of lies of knowledge
Yes, something that should be taught in all disciplines starting in grade school.
@Mike Doonsebury There a difference between Knowledge, Belief, Scientific Hypothesis, and a Scientific Theory. If you understood the difference, you wouldn't have posted your comment.
Far too many people think a scientific hypothesis when stated, is something that scientists know to be true, or are asserting to be true. No, it's only a possibility they have reason to believe MAY be true, and do not have any verifiable evidence for it yet.
@@KrustyKlown What you just stated is the Definition of a Theory. This guy in this video is stating as fact. That is falsifying evidence, in the name of Consensus Science. To me looses all credibility. Even with a Dr. at the beginning of his name.
@@eatersofdead found someone who doesn't know the difference between theory as used colloquially and theory used in a scientific context. Shocker.
I love how Dr. Lincoln explains these things. The available information is very well presented. If he was my teacher when I was much younger I almost certainly would have gone into theoretical physics, the wonderment of science. Amazing.
word
He never explain anything really in detail. Most of the time it's "we know this and that"
Herr Schmidt Maybe because he must summarize in 20 Minutes a 7000 pages textbook...?
@@SEVideoQuant no he must not^^
Herr Schmidt LoL
"For all we know, there are still things we don't."
There will never be a time in human history where this isn't true.
Yes we will. Tomorrow. Two mnths after your comment. We still don't know all shit.
What I don’t know could fill Soldier Field.
But we do know that all physical states are derived from previous states. And we do know of another class of object not requiring an initial state.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@@mitchellc4 Why are you quoting entirely unrelated fiction books under a video about science?
The best part of this channel is your HONESTY! This is the very best video on this subject. I am a big believer in the colliding branes.
"But before that, the universe was way hotter"
Weren't we all?
Hotter than that archer? I struggle to envisage such heat.
@@motog4221 He means when we were younger, as well.
@@davidm5707 and I mean that archer was hawt. Kazowie!
May have been hotter but certainly lacking the complexity and depth which develop with curated aging.
I always thought what happened before the Big Bang was Two and a Half Men, both created by the same producer....😁😁😁😁😷😷😷😷😷
Just want to say, I appreciate that there are men and women out there like Dr. Lincoln who are dedicating their lives to unraveling life's greatest mystery.
... and wasting their time fabricating theories.
@@jonb6417 you are clueless
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@@mitchellc4 Koo Koo!!! 🤣
@@mitchellc4 nope, thats not it...
What happened before the big bang, the short version:
"Dunno".
the only thing they know is, that they know nothing...
PARTICLES!
they did the smashing thing, very hot mmm spicy, then boom big expansion
Michio Kaku is working on a theory that our big bang was caused by another universe.??? How much more BS do they think we are going to take.
this has been answered in 2019 paper by Neurokinetikz..I Dunno why these scientists keep persisting on WE DUNNO..
it's simple..dig in and get enlightened..
Theoretical Implications
Either the universe has the properties of a hologram.
Or the hologram has the properties of a universe.
What is the Universe?
The universe is a black hole. And every black hole is a universe.
The big bang is the collapse of our black hole into a singularity, creating a universe in its interior.
The universe is a black hole contained in a parent universe with the same laws of physics and other black holes.
The 7th dimension of string theory is the plane of possible universes with the same laws of physics but different initial conditions.
Thanks, just as i suspected.
This voice felt so familiar after listening to "The Theory of Everything" on Audible! Checking the professor's name both here and there clarified that it was not just a coincidence, but I never pictured the mustache. 😁 Great lectures!
What a pleasant, likeable chap. Very well explained
For me this is the best channel on UA-cam to learn things about physics. Thanks for these valuable contents !
"I's not a sin to not know something, it's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't." Well said Dr. Lincoln
Someone tell this to Trump pleases!!!
no such thing as a sin...science tends to learn most from its mistakes... and who the hay is doctor lincoln?
@@mattpotter8725 that is below my pay grade
@@daieast6305 The word "sin" here is meant more like a "mistake", he used it just to piss on religions. You don't know who doc is, really? Google him
@@daieast6305 It's below everybody's pay grade, but I still wish someone would tell him, but then he thinks he knows everything better than everybody else. Maybe only his own daughter could tell him, he seems to listen to her.
I'm a fairly intelligent person holding bachelor degrees in biology (with a minor in chemistry), medical technology, and nursing, in that order. I'm a retired R.N. about 10 years now. In all that schooling, I thereby have an almost total science background. Out of all that science, I've only had 2 courses in physics that didn't require calculus. Those 2 courses would be Physical Chemistry, which are the booger bears of physics courses! I guess that explains why I was only able to fully comprehend his concepts. I really need to go back and watch the video again to try to comprehend those parts that went over my head! To be honest, I was humbled by this presentation. I rarely run across anything I read or see that goes completely over my head. 🤔
It goes over your head because it's complete 🐂 It's intended to be incomprehensible so you will buy into their religious dogma and they can get more funding.
Optimists: The glass is half full
Pessimists: The glass is half empty
Dr. Lincoln: Suppose you have a container that had both air and water
The glass is full half air, half water. You must count blessings you can not see.
Yes
Engineer: the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
"It's a sin to think you do when you clearly don't."
I see this sin committed all around me practically everyday.
Well at least it’s not adultery.
Definition of religion.
@@larswadefalk6423 Exactly, they think they know what can't be known. Then condemn science.
Sin merely means "Short Comings" so everyone has Sin.
@@6862ptc that's a false. stop being a bigot.
'I will never lie to you'. Humility is a requirement for good science.
And desperately lacking today. Just look at how the lab leak hypothesis was treated (lied about).
@@HamhocksUnlimited It's not any different from Mengele actually.
It's usually something that is often said by liars actually - otherwise why would they feel the need to say it - other than to reassure the gullible...
@@HamhocksUnlimited I'm trying to work out if you are a troll or just uneducated (I suspect its the latter).
Its perfectly reasonable and entirely honest to say there exists a consensus if indeed a consensus does exist. There are many scientific explanations for which there is indisputably a consensus. Biological evolution and the Big Bang are two such examples. It may be that you personally don't like those explanations because (perhaps) they conflict with your preferred religious narrative, but it is demonstrably true that they represent the scientific consensus on those issues.
November yeah
Thank you Dr Lincoln for another exceptional piece.
“I will never lie to you,” said on April 1st.
Nope, was uploaded on 2020-03-31.
@@c.augustin G O T T E M🥇💯🆒️
@@VanBurenOfficial Ah, well, I forgot the ;-) - I was only half serious ;-)
Still, a great comment 😅
@@c.augustin but the comment is in 1st of April so the comment itself is a lie..😁😁
This is absolutely the most interesting video I think I've seen on this subject. This is dealing with our universe. Heavy on the word "our".
You mean MY Universe. You exist in my Universe pal. You should be so lucky.
We ARE Universe!! 🇬🇧
The problem is that we only have a small sample size, taken over a tiny period of time, and from one infinitesimally small spot in the universe. Our perspective is fixed, and we have to make many assumptions based only on the tiny snippets of information we can collect at that point. It's like sampling the air one inch above the ground outside your front door for a week, and then trying to describe the whole of the Earth's atmosphere in minute detail, just from those readings. Yet even with millions of weather measurements taken around the globe every day, dozens of weather satellites in orbit, and vast amounts of computing power running simulations, we still don't have the granularity to accurately predict the exact conditions at that one spot at any point in time. Now imagine this on a universal scale.
And what if our assumptions are totally wrong?
How true ! Humans are overfilled of fake certitudes
James Webb surprised everyone
The
Big bang .was different when the deep infra red james webb telescope shook up the science tists when they did not see what they thought they should see
Holy moly there's hundreds of comments
I love that you use 'Centigrade'. I still do it, but then change it to 'Celsius' because I don't think anybody will know what I'm talking about nowadays.
"But that would be a lie, and I'll never lie to you"
*sniff*
*thanks don*
Next sentence: I think I can hear my lab calling.
Yeah, do you, really?
Scientists are always truthful, never corrupted like, say global warming or the COVID-19 scamdemic, ...
@@texasnewt Global warming is real and so is Covid.
Spoiler: I don't know, you don't know, we don't know, and we'll probably never know
Thor L we'll know when we get to heaven, Jesus will show us.
We’re no suppose to know we gotta enjoy what we got
Edyon hahaha
zesty_sauce lol you can’t do nothing your dead lmaooo
@@olblu8746 death is a end to a life and nothing lies beyond that idiot
“I would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned”.
@Larry Chappell The elephant in the room is that before the big bang there was nothing (no time, no space, no mass, no energy). Genesis 1:1 - In the beginning God created... The physical laws of time and space, and the relationship of mass and energy, and all atomic values defined in the first microsecond. Since God created them he operated outside those parameters and is in no way limited by them in any way. So what was before the big bang we can never know...until we die and then it won't matter.
Apparently the universe is a one-time event. It was created, will exist for a period of time (approximately 145 billion years) then the "Big Rip" will end it all with all mass reduced to sub-atomic particles and be rolled up like a scroll.
tru
@@spyeatte So Genesis is your science textbook?
The flood
Tower of Babel
Adam and Eve
Talking serpents
The Nephili
The children of God mating with the daughters of men
etc.
Are part of your science curriculum?
@@spyeatte here is why religion is so toxic to people. They think Pretending to know the unknown is knowing and make unsubstantiated claims is virtuous as long as its made in the name of diety and religion
@@karnobot9814 Yep. They try to explain stuff that can be explained with science, given time, with some crazy idea of an all powerful being creating everything and when they’re is a legit good point against religion they point to faith
This man is the first honest scientist on this subject. We don’t know… and we may never know the nature of the universe
Bro, were you really listening to him? "Everything after 10 to the minus 13 seconds is solidly known.". This man believes that he knows solidly how the universe was created back to the very first second. He's so narcissistic, that he says they don't exactly know what happened from time 0 to 10^-13 seconds, but what they think is sensible speculation. After 10^13 seconds? Oh no, that's not speculation. He just knows.
I have no problem with the theory. It may be true. It may not be. Personally, I think the odds of them actually being correct are astronomical (no pun intended). My problem is the insane amount of arrogance to basically just take this theory as complete fact. Actually, I don't think he "basically" takes it as fact. I'm pretty sure he completely takes this as fact, and a done deal. Which again, I have no problem with him believing that either. I wished he would just acknowledge it as a belief. A very strong belief.
@@mpersand If you listen near the end he states that what we presently know might not be correct at all so that negates your "narcissistic" comment, but then again it takes one to know one 🤪
Why does science think we are the ONLY "BIG BANG" out their in infinite space?
Travel fast enough and far enough and you will run into other big bang zones forever and ever.
@@johnslugger and how do you substantiate your claim?
@@mpersand Unless you know more than anyone else on this subject matter, of few "evidences" that we currently have of Big Bang theory, a couple of them are CBR and red shifts - which raises more question of validity of the claim than actually being evidences.
What we can all agree is that - there are so many things we do not know - and perhaps will never know, about the universe.
When I was a kid, one of my classmates used to argue that our universe (and its expansion) is simply the other side of some other parallel universe's black hole. We debated and argued over this idea throughout the fifth grade.
As the saying goes: "If you can't show it, you don't know it." I will admit I've had the same idea myself, and it's a fun one, but there's problems about the questions of energy quantity and why black holes don't seem to lose any coherent level of mass, although the search for Hawking radiation is still on.
Janet Jeppsen (Mrs Isaac Asimov) wrote a novel about that very idea. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Asimov "The Last Immortal" (1980) (as J. O. Jeppson)
that's the holographic principle, based on information thought to be imprinted on a black hole's event horizon, which was established as the solution to the information paradox by stephen hawking i think. Then speculation arose that the same thing could apply to our whole universe, all the universe as information imprinted on a two dimensional hologram, either encircling our universe or imprinted on a black hole's event horizon. This encouraged further speculation taking the idea to its most extreme conclusion-the simulation hypothesis. Holographic principle though merely speculative is way more sensible than the latter. But that's only relatively speaking.
They are both fringe ideas. Indeed two experiments have been done to test for the holographic principle, one was to test for the equivalent of pixels in the structure of space-time. If this is holographic, then space will be pixelated. However so far no pixelation has been found. Another experiment, this one non lab based, used telescopes to measure the journey of different types of electromagnetic waves, specifically if space-time is not a smooth membrane like medium, then Fermi's LAT would have detected a significant time lag between the arrival of the lowest-energy and highest-energy gamma rays. In fact, to within one part in 100 million billion, the two photons traveled at the same speed. Many approaches to new theories of gravity picture space-time as having a shifting, frothy structure at physical scales trillions of times smaller than an electron. Some models predict that the foamy aspect of space-time will cause higher-energy gamma rays to move slightly more slowly than photons at lower energy.
Such a model would violate Einstein's edict that all electromagnetic radiation -- radio waves, infrared, visible light, X-rays and gamma rays -- travels through a vacuum at the same speed.
Fermi showed that pixelation or rough 'texture' in space-time may not exist at all. So far the smoothness of the space-time continuum has been confirmed. So that's NO to the holographic principle or simulation hypothesis. It confirms the aether/vacuum conventional idea, supported by Einstein and his predecessors which describes spacetime as euclidean.
However all this fringe speculation, especially occupying populist 'science' circles, started with the information paradox black hole problem, which I'm not satisfied is solved, and I don't even think it's that great a problem-energy can't be created or destroyed, information can't be lost. These rules may not apply in extreme situations e.g. at the high energy and temperatures just after time equals zero st the big bang our laws of physics did not apply. And similarly things break down in black holes-which are the most extreme predictions derived from General relativity's mathematics-all the tensor and vector calculus. the schwarzschild metric and the kerr metric describes the physics of black holes, and it's pretty crazy,the maths says in a kerr black hole you can visit your own past. Black holes spin space and time. All real black holes are spinning black holes. The angular momentum of the star thay collapsed, plus the material the black hole devows, even at a quantum level, the angular momentum of every fermion and boson means black holes always rotate. A paper in the astrophysical journal detailed how gamma ray bursts seem to produce superluminal motion, with superluminal gamma waves being time reversed.. gamma ray burst only happen in very extreme cosmological events and therefore are another example of where our laws of physics may break down to produce faster than light travel through space under that unique condition. iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3bdf
It doesn't make sense cause what would've caused that universe. And then that universe and then that and then that and then that universe. There must be a beginning
Pretty cool dialog for 5th graders! In 5th grade I spent most of my time avoiding cooties and trying to figure out why those creatures called girls were starting to be interesting!
Subbed simply because i genuinely learned with no ads
Me 2
When will it get dubbed?
"i was a cute baby" nice try, we all know you were born 54
@MesohornyMeloveulongtime idk but man I can’t stop laughing
@@blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517 Boy this guy got Game!! He's probably got Tons of Women, waiting outside his Tent on the Sidewalk!!
54? I am not sure I get the reference. The opposite of 45?
Lmao
@Brad Watson i'd rather siddharta gautama return than jesus.
amazing explanations on mind boggling theories. thank you. I started learning and don't intend to stop. ive always wanted to learn about this stuff. , physics and chemistry so that when someone asks me what i know i can finally say I know about .. literally..everything. 🤓
lol
Learn to capitalize first. Then learn about other stuff.
mmm... how does mind work, exactly? how to make a sentient creature? we don't know that, yet
I teach astronomy and this still blows my mind
Thank you Dr. Lincoln. You are one of the best science communicators of our age. Keep the videos coming!
Horse manewer
Yes, he changed the universe and the world 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Hi Don! It was informative video for everyone.That's because,you explained to us in a clear and concise way.
Thanks & regards.
yes, can you get something from nothing?try it, do your experiment idiot.
Another excellent presentation by Dr Don.
I may have to listen to this video 100 before I absorb all of its content. He communicates EXTREMEMY well; but single sentences often contain 3 or more complex ideas that have to be understood individually before connecting them together so as to grasp the meaning of the entire sentence. Each successive sentence then builds upon what preceded it. It's a struggle for me but an immensely rewarding one.
It's science fiction. Bull feces.
@@johnjepsen4243 do you believe Jesus magiced it up? I guess that's easier. But you never get to learn anything worthwhile.
"extrememy"?
Read my post above, Marq!
@@Dawn-Songs Genesis tells us what happened science is trying to discover how it happened.
I think all of this is confusing to me, still I'm watching it.
Me too.
ynow what they say:
what happened before the bigbang,
stays before the bigbang.
so, its rude to ask
Is this a haiku?
@@VanBurenOfficial no, it's a reference to Vegas. what happens inside cygnus x-1, stays inside cygnus x-1.
You can’t get behind that event .... even under the influence of LSD or your mind altering of choice ,,, you can’t get behind that singular moment ... hint would be .... it’s not the speed of light goofy , it’s the speed of sound ..... duh .. he said ... let there be
@@Mellownius you're not as think as i drunk you are?
d4v0r_x - To ask is not rude. Not to understand and visualise things could be rude.
Thank heavens that your son is thinking about this! We need him😉
I'm an accountant, I thought until now finance ruled the world but I have now seen the light, yes I now agree PHYSICS is everything
Let's hope the James Webb can get safely up and bring sooo much more.
Yes!!! Now. I give 10:1 odds that the view is at least 10x "bigger" than before. Zo send me your bet & I will start an escrow account to cover it. O...BTW, there R so many shibboleths in this BS video that I will refuse to accept wagers from those of you who believe any of the absurdities claimed about all that BS about what exists beyond what real science can study (etc.).
A most splendid offering. The science explained in a calm and pragmatic manner. Thanks so much.
"Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein:" Isaiah 42:5 "Which commandeth the sun, and it riseth not; and sealeth up the stars.
8 Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea.
9 Which maketh Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades, and the chambers of the south.
10 Which doeth great things past finding out; yea, and wonders without number." Job 9:7-10 Also search; Isaiah 45:12: Isaiah 40:22: And John 1:1-5 "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not." Also John 3:16-18
Before the mountains were born or you brought forth the whole world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God....Psalm 90 verse 2
Or.... It could be a red pill/ blue pill thing going on
His most astute statement is "let's talk about the things we do know". His next word following that is "assuming".
But if we do know, then we do know while he is assuming.
when u assume u make an ass of u & me.
@@athasmak1161 : one thing i do know is that 'we' is way overused!
@wade smith : yup, another scientist talkin out his assuming
Things we do know. Assuming. Well, at one time people KNEW if you traveled to far you could fall off the edge of the earth, assuming the world was flat. Also the earth was the center of all there was. What is truth today can be rubbish tomorrow with new discoveries. The best we can do is Assume we are correct.
video title: What happened before the Big Bang?
me: well, obviously the Big Foreplay
Two and a Half Men before and Young Sheldon later....
Our universe on my wild guess was a product of a very large black hole which reach its maximum compression of singularity causing it to explode as the big bang.
@@olivernald I have a few black holes in mind. Some are a bit on the brown side though
There is no before...the BB is a perpetual. This means the entire universe is constantly recycling itself...it's a process machine.
El basho. best comment on utube. Legend 😅🤣
“You’re so hot even physics don’t apply to you
Underappreciated comment right here
Damn that's smooth.
Wow, thanks brah. I'm not gay though. Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings buddy...
Well, since he’s speaking of a point in TIME at 10 to the -48 seconds, in other words pretty effing early in the history of the universe, I think it could also be said, “You’re so fresh the laws of physics don’t apply to you! “ Just another scientifically observed option...
Wait did Vsauce said that
Thank you for a straightforward video about this subject!
"What happened before the big bang"
"We dont know"
thanks.
Is there any reason to know that there was a big bang?
@@Music1art Id rather know when the sky engineer can come round and set up my tv at the moment lol
Not only "We don't know," but "We probably _can't_ ever know."
The Bang had already presumably happened, and expansion was already underway at the earliest point our observations can tell us anything concrete. Anything _anyone_ has to say on the actual _origin_ of the matter, energy, space, and time involved in that expansion, whether the person be of secular persuasion or theological, is a matter taken on the basis of neither empiricism nor rationalism. That leaves faith.
(and before anyone claims that he uses rationalism in the video, yes, he does, but only up to the point where physics becomes meaningless. Before that, he openly admits that there is only speculation, with no actual data).
@@ketchup5344, changing the topic, why? It's about whether the big bang happened or not. If there is or not a "sky engineer" how can that prove the existence of the big bang?
@@Music1art Yes. The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is direct evidence of the big bang.
Thank you for another great physics video! During most of your videos you are standing in front of a black board with all kinds of calculations, that really intrigue me. I know the black board is primarily for show. But, I wonder if you would consider discussing the black board and some of the equations that are pertinent?
@Slippery Storm Funny, Don doesn't look like one of those kind of guys!
@Slippery Storm Careful Slippery, you're gonna get us in trouble!
That would require imagining that the viewer is capable of thinking beyond the surface of things, and that is just something that isn't done in the case of videos like these. It's much easier to provide the appearance of teaching, than it is to actually TEACH.
When a scientist says "We don't know" respect goes up.
And when religious-ists claim they know something, the opposite happens.
@@davidwayne8336 Claiming to know the answer to something isn’t disreputable in and of itself. It’s the answer you seem to have a bias against, and therefore a hostility that lowers your respect for any theist. But there are perfectly reasonable reasons why we believe God caused the Big Bang, such as the first mover argument. Or the uncaused cause
@@alexamaya3208 Don’t take that guy as an example for all thiests. Believe it or not some of us think they’re may be something after death, we just don’t believe in a particular god.
@@davidwayne8336 But only from unbelievers. We can share the Gospel but only a fool says there is no God. That is from Psalms. And if we share, that person's salvation is not our responsibility. It is between that person and God, not between me and the unbeliever. So you see, I am commanded to share the gospel but not responsible. You are neither, but insist on demanding believers betray Jesus Christ. I pray you come to recognize His call.
@@alexamaya3208 Very well stated. Factual and reasonable.
What happened at t=0 and "before" is unknowable and will never be known. End of story.
The way he says “much, much before that time!” Makes you understand a bit more how old time is.
Yeah and it could be a spring chicken at the same time
He was actually there and has the ticket to prove it
@RDE Lutherie mhm that' why whe don't even know shit about stuff like dark matter and energy and we basically find every several days stuff or bodies in the universe that shouldn't exist the way they do regarding our theories.
Not saying it's all crap but oh boy we are so far away from knowing anything.
@@herrschmidt5477 Scientists know a lot, but the human race is very young. There's stuff we don't even know to question yet, let alone have any answers to. If there is any such thing, we'd have to become gods ourselves to know everything, and we probably still wouldn't.
dr. lincolns humble and honest demeanor is so refreshing in comparison with the dogmatic arrogance so prevalent in the scientific community.
You mean religion
@@j.wick6666 no denying there are religious dogmatists. dr. lincoln represents the scientific community though.
@@bjknuckles7873 so he's talking like any other scientists who talks about the subject, you're just push a bs view you have of other scientists you don't agree with that tend to be atheistic
@@j.wick6666 no just the ones that are arrogantly dogmatic. you do realize not all scientists agree about everything. and there are some who are overly high on their opinion, which is often a scientistic opinion and not a scientific one.
@@bjknuckles7873 name one universally known scientists that does this
I just can't get past how the universe went from something the size of a pinhead to enough volume to make up all the matter we no of and all the rest we haven't seen yet. Great video btw.
...and they say that WE believe in Faerie Tales...
But you can get past how DNA supposedly programed itself?
@@radrook7584 Oh wow I guess that definitely means a man walked on water 2000 years ago. Lol. Get real bro.
@@suserman7775 There's no connection.
Because it didn't this is science fiction
Dr. Don Lincoln, this by far the best video I have ever seen on the big bang theory & quite opening when you mentioned that we do not know what was universe like at time = zero & I guess 10th -43 secs.
This is such a great video explaining very complex ideas to the general public. Thank you ! I just subscribed based on the quality of this vid.
Woot Dr. Don is safe from CV! Glad to see another video! Stay safe!
I don't know why I watch these videos that talk about this specific "what came before" subject expecting an answer. Regardless of how interesting and how well they answer this question, the answer is inevitably going to be the same: we just don't know. It is amazing that they know as much as they do.
Actually there's a very great deal we do know, and it's not flattering.
Einstein said: "thermodynamics is the one theory of universal content which will never be overthrown".
Arthur Eddington made Einstein Einstein. He said: "if your theory challenges thermodynamics there is no hope for you other than total humiliation".
These theorists, well-intentioned or other(Brian Greene), put bread on their
table with their theories. NO ONE grants $$$ to respond to, "we don't know and
there's every reason to think we never will". So reasonably they HAVE to propose
hypotheses. But NOTHING is suggested that doesn't conflict prima facie with
thermodynamics. 1st Law disallows heat from cold: this universe of heat from "nothing"(cold). 2nd Law demands that heat goes only to cold: this universe of heat
would have distributed to cold if eternal....it has not so it's not eternal.
NOTICE NONE of them EVER refer to a reconciliation with thermodynamics.
NOT because they don't have it...OF COURSE THEY DON'T. But because NO ONE
EVER voices the words; "thermodynamics is wrong". It's the clergy saying "there's no God"; THEIR JOB IS OVER!!
(some clown will suggest quantum physics; QM can NEVER conflict with "conservation laws".)
Don Lincoln here did not properly explain what actually occurred before existence expanded out of the singularity. The singularity is where/when all this existence was merged into, you got it, a "singularity". What is this singularity? This is energy at its maximum level of intensity, an infinite level of intensity. It is not possible to go beyond an infinite/maximum level of energy which is why we can logically conclude the singularity does not have a beginning. As existence expands, the level of energy decreases, and will continue decreasing until its minimum level of intensity, even if it takes an eternity to get there.
@@WayneLynch69 learn inflation and Vilenkin's tunneling
@@WayneLynch69 but, how do you really know? You put your trust in what you read. How do you really know that's what Einstein actually said? He may be fiction.
I know it seems to all make sense but, how can we really know.?
Matter can't be created from nothing but at one time it was. Our brains are not equipped to deal with this type of problem. There is something out there that we are completly blind to. We need more than the 5 senses that we have.
The question I’ve always been interested in is “how long was there nothing before there was something?” It’s probably more philosophical than anything.
The singularity consisted of absolutely all the energy in the universe. It wasn't nothing
@@drsatan3231 Wrong. There was no "singularity". There was no "Big Bang'
Matter can't be created from nothing but at one time it was. Our brains are not equipped to deal with this type of problem. There is something out there that we are completly blind to. We need more than the 5 senses that we have.
@@picanto12 Matter can't be created from nothing but at one time it was. Our brains are not equipped to deal with this type of problem. There is something out there that we are completly blind to. We need more than the 5 senses that we have.
I believe, when there was nothing, there still was something, somewhere else. Like cause and effect. There was never just nothing. And at the same time, there was something, at least to the observer.
7:44 the best 10 seconds of a UA-cam ever !!!!
Yessss!
is xfce still being develop?
@@arzentvm unfortunately, not as often as I'd like. :(
Lol religions, God, Hell, other bullshit
@@SilenceStabber it's not bullshit
Q: What happened before the Big Bang?
Scientist's honest answer: We just don't know.
Ah, but Q probably does know ;).
ua-cam.com/video/xfDpDCsULn0/v-deo.html
The quantum simulation computer was switched to the on position.
And before that...
The quantum, quantum simulation, simulation computer was switched on.
And before that, God was still asleep after a crazy party....
What's honesty got to do with it?
@@cosmodeus1720 Lol. I loved that episode when Captain Morgan brought everyone free rum.
Science deniers: "Got you now. I knew it, you know nothing and I've got the truth"
Fantastic. Helps a layman like me actually understanding some of the great questions of physics.
Big Bang theory is Bullshit. No one was there!!!!!!
Or were " they" ? 🧐
God explains how he made all things . Test His Word and see whether it aligns with what is true or not. The Big Bang is not how all life began . Entropy disproves the hypothesis.
Any layman can know what Gods teaches.
@@mikebrunet54 Yea, why should we listen to modern science when we have a 2000 years old book with fairy tales to learn from.
Thank you for your honesty!
That's why I love science
We don't know ❤️
Until we know
"Everything after 10^-13 second is solidly known..."
That's a bold statement.......
Only on macroscopic scales.
And it's also utter bollox!
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
Mitchell C if Jesus did did exist (I’m not saying he did or doesn’t) I’m fairly sure he wouldn’t encourage you spamming people while they here listening and learning.
@@mitchellc4 He won’t return for as long as you keep spamming
I love these videos, as it gets me thinking about the universe, and just how complex everything is! I wish I had paid more attention at school, especially to the science classes
It's never too late to learn!
I paid attention in school, but the basic highschool fysics was pretty hard for me, so I give all the credit to Dr. Lincoln explaining this much more complicated stuff in such a way I can follow it.
The universe never started and will never end. It’s just always been there.
"What happened before the big bang?" Easy answer.
"We dont know"!!
hahahahhaha ye this is real answer :D
the small bang
Well, actually it can ALL be traced back to the rather short coitus!
I will never agree to that. We do. It’s obvious. Like knowing how the Grand Canyon formed. We KNOW. but we can never actually see it.
@@johnstumpf8401 closest answer I have seen. Excellent. ❤️
These are the kind of videos you watch at 3 AM
lol 😂
I am watching at 730 am
1 am here
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@@mitchellc4 what relevance does that have with what we were saying?
Awesome to have freely lectures that were once limited to the priviledged few. The Spice must flow.
The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
John 17
3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.
@@mitchellc4 ok
@@mitchellc4 🤡
Awesomely riveting Dr DON LINCOLN. Can't get better!!
I loved the way Dr Lincoln presented this fascinating tutorial. It was knowledgeable without being over-complicated and enthusiastic without being hysterical! A moment in time that is 1 to the minus 43 of a second is just as incomprehensible to me as the concept of all the universe being “not quite zero-sized” haha that could have come from Python! However I asked this question of a genuine astrophysicist myself some years ago and am prompted to ask it again ask again “WHERE was this super-dense, super-hot, super-tiny particle at the time?” Being a fan of the old Marvel comics stories that often drew in the universes within universes, I have this vision of alien scientists looking at a slide in an electron microscope billions of years ago and one, recoiling from a blinding flash in his viewfinder turns to his puzzled colleagues and drily says “We’re gonna need a bigger lab”
Great stuff ! I’m subscribed!
You've subscribed to absolute nonsense my friend! Rather get the book THE SHACK by Paul Young, you will do much better.
@@eekay5710 how is the subject matter being discussed here in any way “nonsense”? And more importantly, what the heck does a religious fiction book like “The Shack” have to do with ANYthing being talked about here? That would be like a medical doctor having their palm “read” in order to better understand how to perform surgery on a patient. If you want to see someone who is truly “subscribed to nonsense”, all you need to do is look in a mirror 🪞
@@eekay5710 The Shack? Now that is a load of nonsense. Give your head a shake.
Alan - I have the same question…WHERE was this super small, super dense piece of matter? If this tiny ball of matter existed, in what medium (if any) did it exist in? It’s a mind-boggling concept to try and get your head around. Did you ever get a satisfactory answer to the question?
OR, most of you brainiacs out there could just wait until you die when all answers will be revealed to you by God.
No? Not buying that one? Didn’t think so. And don’t ask me to prove God exists. Because you can’t prove that any of this is correct. Maybe some but not all.
Just perhaps they are one in the same. How you like those apples? And no, I’m not much into religion, just offering a different perspective is all. But that debate has been going on for years and years. Again, just a grain of sand in the vast desert we call space. Nothing more important than a piece of lint.
Poor Uli. I suspect his birthday cake has been long forgotten.
It was a cupcake that expanded into a multilayer sheet cake.
I much prefer a cellular peptide cake.
ua-cam.com/video/qr7ZLYPtiRs/v-deo.html
Thanks for a video during covid!
I know none of the math, but I love all of the information. Fascinating. I listen to every o e of these. My mind constantly thinks about all of the information. Thank You.
The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
@Andy Solomons Well, it's certainly simple for you...
In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth. Science will hopefully understand that they can't figure some things out because it is beyond human comprehension.
Sounds like Hitchhikers Guide to me....
@@claytonrealist8868 So why do you think you can place a god in there, if it is "beyond human comprehension"?
@@silknfeathers your problem might be a problem of semantics. The word 'God' might be used with the most varied of meanings of all words.
Think about what this video attempts to contemplate: what is before the beginning of the universe, and even is the cause of the universe? Do we yet have a word for it?
Start with a brand new word; and give it an initial meaning, such as: that which exists independently from and causes our known universe of space, time, matter, and energy. Then, by way of logic and reason, describe the attributes which are necessary for such a 'thing' to be accurately defined as such.
If it exists independently of time, then it is timeless. If it exists independently of space, then it is omnipresent. If it exists while there is no matter, then it is immaterial. If it causes the beginning of all known energy and matter, then it is omnipotent. If it exists timelessly yet causes at a time, it might be considered agency. If it causes all that is known it is omniscient. Keep going.
One can come up with a few more logically necessary attributes. Then you can call it what you want. You can even recognize that some people are already using a word for this. Maybe they are importing more meaning ascribed to that word than some people find comfortable. It's semantics, at that point.
Or you can take the view that you don't like any of the logical conclusions about the necessary attributes, and choose instead to believe that 'nothing' could precede (or co-exist with) the moment of creation, but that is logically absurd.
"what happened before the Big BANG"
.... the Big Seduction?......
The Big Blow, usually comes before the big bang. Seduction starts well before that.
Underrated
The Big Cosby
@@nebwachamp You win. Best reply yet!
The best explanation of the beginning of our universe I’ve heard. Wish he had been my physics teacher.
Accepting that we don’t know something is a talent any good scientist must possess.
Love these. Even the bits that hurt my brain!
Just listened to "Some Enchanted Evening" for the first time last night. No B.S.! I was floored by ETI.
Bringing the light of knowledge! Combing curiosity with scientific enquiry.
Good stuff
Dr. Don Lincoln - Thank You!!!! I'm watching your Great Courses Series... I find it just awesome that folks like Dr. Don care enough to take the time to "translate" this cool knowledge and information to the proletarians... Sooo cool... I'm hooked... forget rock stars... and actors... Don is the real star!!! thanks!
.?0m
Thank you )) I learned a few things from this video and my day is not waisted 😀
Did you know God created the world?
Did you also know a guy named Georges Lemaître, (1894-1966), Belgian cosmologist, Catholic priest came up with the idea of a big bang theory?
The definition of ( theory ) is-
a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
"Darwin's theory of evolution is also just and idea some man had.
In the 1920's is when the idea happen, and it's weird because he was a priest and if he read the Bible it says on the first page God created the world. Unless he didn't really believe the Bible and is one of the people the Bible talks about being a wolf in sheep's clothing deceiving people and causing confusion.
Most people don't believe the Bible because they say it was written by man and it's wrong but instead some go and believe in nothing or in evolution and the big bang or both those together without the thought of God creating the world...
Did you know the Bible says there's a number for man and it's the same number as the beast and the number is 666? How did someone thousands of years ago know that the number of man was 666 without DNA testing or the technology you'd need to know that? Because humans have carbon-12 in them which is made up of 6 protons 6 electrons and 6 neutrons and also Jesus and Lucifer where referred to as stars in the Bible and stars too also have carbon-12. How can they possibly know this information unless they where given the knowledge.
But with all the confusion and lies in the world through time people lost the truth. Now we have people believing in other man's words about life and creation of earth and humans when they truly don't know and the Bible is the answer to those questions without a doubt if you are wide enough to understand what it says which everyone should because God is not the author of confusion...
We all need to put are faith and trust back into God and his only begotten son Jesus Christ.
For God so loved the world he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth on him will not perish but have everlasting life
He died on the cross and rose again to save us all from sin cause by the devil.
Peace and love to everyone who reads this.
JESUS IS THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE NO ONE CAN GET TO THE FATHER BUT BY HIM.
But Not how to spell!
I love to watch scientists explain things about the universe that can't be proven in our life time. Maybe in a few generations we'll probably
be able to if the human race will still be around that is.
No one can explain where the original energy that caused the big bang came from.I think it always existed because there is no begining only cycles of birth and death of everything including our planet,sun,etc.
@@routmaster38 it may not have been a big bang
@@stevelozevski8151 Couldn't have been. No-one had ears.
@@ArtyFactual_Intelligence 🤣🤣🤣
Sometimes I think we're inside of a black hole giving ua the illusion that space is expanding but actually shrinking from the forces of the black hole...shit this weed is good.
something my older brother said once was " the universe is microscopic and we live at the singularity of an infinitely collapsing black hole." probably not true, but i the sentiment.
If we just gave Fermilab a bunch of "brownies", we'd get so many great physics advancements. HA!
You might be on to something. Matter contracting, and the heavy bits dragging it's satellites with it, would look identical to space expanding.
The trouble with us shrinking is that EM radiation wouldn't be affected - meaning we'd start going blind as the sun puts out the same frequencies while our eyes shrink too small to see them.
I like the chalkboard filled with equations behind him to make him look smart
Cuz he is
@@mountfairweather 🤣
A few years ago did you KNOW that Pluto was a planet??? HOw important is it to know what you DO NOT KNOW?