What happened before the Big Bang?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 бер 2020
  • Understanding how the universe began has been a goal for scientists, philosophers, and theologians for millennia. In this video, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln describes the scientific view on this topic. He covers what we know, what we think, and what we may forever never know.
    To learn more visit:
    fnal.gov
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11 тис.

  • @emeraldaisle2927
    @emeraldaisle2927 Рік тому +34

    The best science quote ever ( 02:42 ), "...That should impress the heck out of you. It still blows my mind, and it's what I do everyday...." - Dr. Don Lincoln

  • @hzk1234
    @hzk1234 4 роки тому +1053

    "It's not a sin to not know something. It's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't"
    - Dr. Don Lincoln

    • @spiralsun1
      @spiralsun1 4 роки тому +9

      Chesky Stern it might also be a sin to say that we don’t know something when we clearly do! We do know what existed before or outside spacetime. You will see what I mean if you stop trying to make your way back to the beginning from within spacetime -when we know that the natural laws break down! Seriously that’s just being stupid. You can take yourself out of the universe one way. By finding the one solid thing that must have existed forever. Probability or probabilities. I explain the implications of this one foundation of reality in my video where I look hideous but Looks aren’t everything 😆🤷‍♀️
      People are so sure that they don’t know but that’s patently ridiculous because you can take the whole universe as an experimental result in a way- and then we DO KNOW that there was the probability of the universe existing. We know that and that’s huge. Probability is prime. It exists without the universe. The implications of that are staggering. I explain in my video. Incidentally I am a scientist in the top 1% of IQ and I have thought about this one thing my whole life. I am not being contentious, flippant, or cute. I discuss these things with Nobel Prizewinners. He’s just wrong.
      ua-cam.com/video/wDiEMCPM7KA/v-deo.html

    • @pradeljames3260
      @pradeljames3260 4 роки тому +27

      @@BadBoiFX let her express her opinions. You don't hold her mind and her conciousness. Why don't you just respect different people's views. Don't be an asshole, we're all Humans. Everybody has the right to express themselves.

    • @timeless_realm
      @timeless_realm 4 роки тому +10

      @@BadBoiFX and, likewise, no one asked for your comment.

    • @StoryGordon
      @StoryGordon 4 роки тому +9

      Misconceptions aren't sins.

    • @wanaraz
      @wanaraz 4 роки тому +15

      @@spiralsun1 BS nonsense!

  • @lubimenergetiky8131
    @lubimenergetiky8131 Рік тому +62

    Finally a good science channel with 0 clickbait. Great job, please stay awesome.

    • @02markcal
      @02markcal Рік тому +5

      I agree just pure science without the hype.

    • @steveshadforth8792
      @steveshadforth8792 10 місяців тому

      Unlike that Bint hoffennhuer

    • @kilosolutions
      @kilosolutions 10 місяців тому

      and it's not for the lack of opportunity. 11:10 proves me right.

    • @RD-kz4wr
      @RD-kz4wr 10 місяців тому

      Great pure science up to 1x10-43 seconds. During this point he throws out the most obvious point and provides 3 explanations even more radical. Physics 'breaking down' is not the most obvious explanation. You can't explain physics if what you use to calculate it doesn't exist yet. Einstein's theory perfectly predicts that space, time, and matter are interdependent. That's the 'physics' relationship we have. It's pretty obvious if you don't have one you don't have any. The most logical explanation is that there was nothing as we know it. No time, matter, or space. His concept of multiple universes is also most logical mathematically, but does not need to intercept with ours.

    • @FurryFoxFren
      @FurryFoxFren 6 місяців тому +1

      Well, it's not like they need to be misleading. They are a real science lab (I can confirm, I have family members working there) that actually works with these things.

  • @madisonnapolitano7531
    @madisonnapolitano7531 6 місяців тому +5

    Amazing! This was such a consumable video! So reasonably timed, and well explained. Very, very fascinating!

  • @benjaminrobles3825
    @benjaminrobles3825 3 роки тому +202

    I love how he does this so we can learn and not the money cause he has no ads

    • @z_boozebag
      @z_boozebag 3 роки тому +8

      same mans a hero

    • @jacksonlarson6099
      @jacksonlarson6099 3 роки тому +3

      I would imagine he already has a decent amount of money in the bank.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 роки тому +1

      == The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory (combining GOD/Nature, Ancient Religions, Astronomy, Cosmology, Laws of Physics, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Chaos Theory, Laws of Biology & Chemistry, Linguistics, Mysticism, and Philosophy))
      "'Energy is neither created or destroyed in an isolated system'. 'The BIG Bang-Bit Bang' inflation/expansion of energy and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our 'parent universe'. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all universes within 'The Conglomerate': multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. 'In the beginning' the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal..‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion 'self-similar offspring' each with the same inherited physical laws (‘DNA’). This ubiquitous cause-and-effect 'circle of life cycle': birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s simple plan for greatly spreading life for everything from cells to universes."
      Why does this Universe exist? Because it's our playground (god + run = ground).
      - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com

      This has triggered The Apocalypse/Revelation which is not the ‘end of the world‘ - it‘s the 2nd Coming (E=mc²).

    • @timguan5353
      @timguan5353 3 роки тому +2

      yep I definitely appreciate that

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 роки тому +1

      == The Conglomerate of Universes - Universe Creation Theory ==
      combining GOD/Nature, GOD=7_4 or Fod=6_4 theory, ancient religions, astronomy, cosmology, fined-tuned laws of physics/general relativity/quantum mechanics, chaos theory/fractals, laws of biology & chemistry, linguistics/code-breaking, programming the Universe, mysticism, and philosophy/anthropic principle

      "Energy can’t be created or destroyed, only transformed/transferred in an isolated system." General relativity allows black holes, white holes and Big Bang.

      ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang’ inflation/expansion of energy₇₄ and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent₇₄ universe’. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density breaking through spacetime in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all created universes within ‘The Conglomerate’: multiverse with no random quantum fluctuation bubble universes, no parallel universes or parallel worlds, and no universes with different physical laws. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion ‘self-similar offspring’ each with the same inherited ‘DNA’.

      “In the beginning”, the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle’: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s plan for greatly spreading life from cells to universes. GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is the #1 program₇₄/law/initial₇₄ condition (GOD704.fandom.com ).

      Why does this Universe exist? It’s our playground (god + run = ground₆₄).

      - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com . Only the returned Christ & Albert Einstein reincarnated could produce this - it's triggered The Apocalypse/ Revelation which is NOT the 'end of the world'. COVID-19 is part of Seal #4: S=19 (18.6) Theory.

  • @scarbo22
    @scarbo22 4 роки тому +262

    So nice to hear a lecture without background music. Thank you.

    • @peaceman269
      @peaceman269 3 роки тому +7

      Yes I agree ditch the music - it's noise and doesn't help

    • @chucktooley4553
      @chucktooley4553 3 роки тому +5

      Same as with porn! A refreshing change, thank you Fermilab. 🖖🏼

    • @keyboardevangelist8956
      @keyboardevangelist8956 3 роки тому

      The good news has once again come to you today. You can inherit the kingdom of God even if you are a sinner.. after all we are all sinners in God's standards of justice and holyness (he says that if a man looks at a woman with lust he has already committed adulterly with her in his heart NO MAN IS THAT PURE😅).....All you have to do is to honestly humbly pray repent turn away from sins (read the10 commandments) and trust that Jesus for his love❤❤ for you he left his throne in heaven and came to the world he was humbled humiliated betrayed beaten and killed for your sake to pay the fine of your sins and mine so that we won't spend our eternity in hell but with him in heaven...this might be the last time you read the gospel...Look around🔥🔥 be smart..the end is nigh🔥 ..He is coming back soooon not as the sacrificed lamb of God🐑..but as King of Kings🤴 the judge of the whole world..Your soul is on the line😭😭. Eternity is a long time.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 роки тому

      == The Conglomerate of Universes - Universe Creation Theory ==
      combining GOD/Nature, GOD=7_4 or Fod=6_4 theory, ancient religions, astronomy, cosmology, fined-tuned laws of physics/general relativity/quantum mechanics, chaos theory/fractals, laws of biology & chemistry, linguistics/code-breaking, programming the Universe, mysticism, and philosophy

      "Energy can’t be created or destroyed, only transformed/transferred in an isolated system." General relativity allows black holes, white holes and Big Bang.

      ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang’ inflation/expansion of energy₇₄ and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent₇₄ universe’. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density breaking through spacetime in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all created universes within ‘The Conglomerate’: multiverse with no random quantum fluctuation bubble universes, no parallel worlds, and no universes with different physical laws. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion ‘self-similar offspring’ each with the same inherited ‘DNA’.

      “In the beginning”, the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle’: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s plan for greatly spreading life from cells to universes. GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is the #1 program₇₄/law/initial₇₄ condition (GOD704.fandom.com ).

      Why does this Universe exist? It’s our playground (god + run = ground₆₄).

      - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com . Only the returned Christ & Albert Einstein reincarnated could produce this - it's triggered The Apocalypse/ Revelation which is NOT the 'end of the world'. COVID-19 is part of Seal #4: S=19 (18.6) Theory. It‘s the 2nd Coming (E=mc²).

    • @bigjapko3139
      @bigjapko3139 3 роки тому

      lecture WITH background music is a show, not lecture.

  • @hansruiter-jo4ke
    @hansruiter-jo4ke Місяць тому +1

    I have seen several of your videos and its always a joy to watch.
    You make the hard to understand much more understandable and even more interesting.
    Thanks for that.

  • @stephenlouden480
    @stephenlouden480 Рік тому +6

    amazing explanations on mind boggling theories. thank you. I started learning and don't intend to stop. ive always wanted to learn about this stuff. , physics and chemistry so that when someone asks me what i know i can finally say I know about .. literally..everything. 🤓

    • @foobarmaximus3506
      @foobarmaximus3506 Рік тому

      lol

    • @foobarmaximus3506
      @foobarmaximus3506 Рік тому

      Learn to capitalize first. Then learn about other stuff.

    • @valinorean4816
      @valinorean4816 Рік тому

      mmm... how does mind work, exactly? how to make a sentient creature? we don't know that, yet

  • @spudhead169
    @spudhead169 4 роки тому +314

    Don, the only complaint I have about your videos is a very serious one and it's something you should seriously consider. There's not enough of them.

    • @ajcook7777
      @ajcook7777 4 роки тому +7

      Not trying to be rude or offend whatsoever with this comment:
      Alot of good knowledge and content but I have a hard time getting over all those forced hand gestures. It's quite easy to tell when someone constantly overuses them, in this case, they became very distracting when they were added in randomly and at will, they just didn't match the script...looked very unnatural...

    • @TheCarpenterUnion
      @TheCarpenterUnion 4 роки тому +6

      @@ajcook7777 I think he oversimplifies things a bit for me..
      The hand gestures are a good facet to presentation.

    • @Elrog3
      @Elrog3 4 роки тому +2

      I'm just glad he doesn't misrepresent science like so many other channels out there.

    • @Pravinkumar-zv7ww
      @Pravinkumar-zv7ww 4 роки тому +1

      Can someone give the content of this video in a short note.

    • @samsum3738
      @samsum3738 4 роки тому

      @@Pravinkumar-zv7ww yes

  • @videos4mydad
    @videos4mydad 4 роки тому +242

    My absolute favorite part of the video is the repetition of how "we dont know" and that it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence. Love it! There is no shame in not knowing - that's what science is all about!

    • @RME76048
      @RME76048 4 роки тому +29

      "... it is far better to admit the truth than to arrogantly proclaim something without evidence." Please tell that to Fox "News." And the President.

    • @cosmodeus1720
      @cosmodeus1720 4 роки тому +7

      ". . .arrogantly proclaim something without evidence."
      This is what annoys the hell out of me about Brian Cox and Michio Kaku.

    • @dunruden9720
      @dunruden9720 4 роки тому +3

      @@RME76048 Quote, "I know this, and I'm a smart guy!" Sheesh!!

    • @Mellownius
      @Mellownius 4 роки тому +1

      Pretty cool since he’s a pretty chill dude ... don’t mind learning from him a little science if he can dig a little faith ... never know , he could learn a thing or two even though I’m pretty sure he’s much smarter than your average bear 😎

    • @lrvogt1257
      @lrvogt1257 4 роки тому +5

      CosmoDeus Are they claiming they know something they don’t know or something YOU don’t know... or are they saying things for which there is evidence and suggesting hypothesis. what have they said is certainly factual that is not?

  • @timmonapier8832
    @timmonapier8832 Рік тому +4

    I haven't heard that put so simply and clearly before. Thank you! Dr Lincoln

  • @UltimaGaina
    @UltimaGaina Рік тому +2

    This voice felt so familiar after listening to "The Theory of Everything" on Audible! Checking the professor's name both here and there clarified that it was not just a coincidence, but I never pictured the mustache. 😁 Great lectures!

  • @JMichael2x2
    @JMichael2x2 4 роки тому +235

    Ironically he gets my attention when he says, “there are some things we don’t know.” That’s probably the most accurate statement in his discussion!

    • @slavaserbie9155
      @slavaserbie9155 4 роки тому +3

      Yes!!!!

    • @jamescaban7710
      @jamescaban7710 4 роки тому +14

      It's more like we know 1% of 100 but we say we got half of it figured out and they call that a theory and then supposedly use the scientific method... if you have 1% of knowledge in a subject no matter what you think you still don't know Jack schitt...

    • @lightningbrigade4722
      @lightningbrigade4722 4 роки тому +3

      Awesome comment

    • @YTho-ev1ej
      @YTho-ev1ej 4 роки тому +16

      @@jamescaban7710 what we know, we know, what we don't, we don't. Not really sure how you can fault him for that. He is providing the only knowledge humans have been able to obtain about our universe and its existence so far.

    • @JMichael2x2
      @JMichael2x2 4 роки тому +6

      Y. Tho - I’m not criticising him, what I said was true. I just think it’s more interesting when scientists talk about what they don’t know, since that’s when the juices of our imagination and innovation explode discovering. Also, when you understand what we don’t know, it’s pretty boring when a scientist starts telling you with great confidence what happened before the Big Bang.

  • @D.NogueraMusic
    @D.NogueraMusic 4 роки тому +1196

    "It's better to have questions you can't answer, than having answers you can't question"
    Edit:
    Quote from Richard Feyman, according to many commenters below.

    • @kleinbot
      @kleinbot 4 роки тому +24

      42

    • @MikeStoddart
      @MikeStoddart 4 роки тому +55

      Science vs Religion?

    • @D.NogueraMusic
      @D.NogueraMusic 4 роки тому +91

      @@MikeStoddart it doesnt have to be a versus. Science, philosophy and religion can become dogmatic for the people who can't admit "I don't know."

    • @lucidstate4664
      @lucidstate4664 4 роки тому +3

      Moron!

    • @Peter_Scheen
      @Peter_Scheen 4 роки тому +40

      @@D.NogueraMusic It goes even further. For many the "I do not know" is not an option. When you say to a creationist that you do not have an answer to a certain question they consider your whole argument invalid.
      Example, Evolution, tons of evidence but we do not know how Abiogenesis exactly works. Therefor, Evolution is rejected.

  • @4apca
    @4apca Рік тому +2

    Thank you Dr Lincoln for another exceptional piece.

  • @lethalrancher
    @lethalrancher Рік тому

    Great video….I did in fact learn from it…thnx for sharing….

  • @Festerbestertester6
    @Festerbestertester6 3 роки тому +33

    I really appreciate that he's able to say "we don't know". It gives "us" (these geniuses) something to work on.

    • @frankcabanski9409
      @frankcabanski9409 3 роки тому +2

      Him: "I don;t know. Therefore, I'm right." Nope.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 роки тому

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @shermie_65
      @shermie_65 3 роки тому +1

      @@mitchellc4 nope genius, thats not it...

  • @MrBrandx8106
    @MrBrandx8106 3 роки тому +959

    Lol my son asked me this question. I said "The Big Date".

    • @jeremiahb3421
      @jeremiahb3421 3 роки тому +33

      Ahhh haha I saw what you did, good job there I saw what you did 😂

    • @Morrodin182
      @Morrodin182 3 роки тому +65

      If he ever asks what will happen after you can say, most likely The Big Breakup :p

    • @besto5486
      @besto5486 3 роки тому +22

      @@Morrodin182 and then the great depression state

    • @dylantrost4471
      @dylantrost4471 2 роки тому +14

      @@Morrodin182 what a lame joke

    • @Morrodin182
      @Morrodin182 2 роки тому +52

      ​@@dylantrost4471 The joke is less lame than your comment though, so I guess you are the whiner eh winner >.>

  • @umangupasham9589
    @umangupasham9589 Рік тому

    Dr. Don Lincoln, this by far the best video I have ever seen on the big bang theory & quite opening when you mentioned that we do not know what was universe like at time = zero & I guess 10th -43 secs.

  • @moragosullivan5166
    @moragosullivan5166 Рік тому

    I know none of the math, but I love all of the information. Fascinating. I listen to every o e of these. My mind constantly thinks about all of the information. Thank You.

  • @friedpicklezzz
    @friedpicklezzz 3 роки тому +383

    A HUGE compliment to the presenter and people involved creating this video. It’s not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way. Not only that, the tempo and depth is just right, there’s no distracting music and the length of the video is just perfect.
    Looking forward learning more.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 роки тому +4

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @Takeabowson1986
      @Takeabowson1986 3 роки тому +18

      @@mitchellc4 do you have evidence that any of this actually happened?

    • @intlvoiceofreason9239
      @intlvoiceofreason9239 3 роки тому +7

      @@mitchellc4 Yikes!!

    • @lederereddy
      @lederereddy 3 роки тому +1

      @Jeroen De Cloe
      "It's not easy to explain difficult things in an easy way."
      That's true when someone's just trying to explain something difficult.
      Like a rocket engineer trying to explain how all the many facets involved in the mechanics of a rocket work together to produce a rocket that does what it's designed to do.
      That would be very difficult to explain in an easy way.
      But Dr Logan, I think it was, he's trying to explain the impossible.
      There is no scientific method in his description. There's no science that could reveal anything about what happened before creation came into being.
      And the big bang model defies the laws of physics, logic, the scientific method and common sense.
      Apparently, this fantasy club actually believe they represent Christ.
      Far from it. Christ taught us to trust God's word. Not change it, amend it, manipulate it, to conform with the secular ideologies of big bangs, billions of years, evolution, etc.
      When, and for how long the creation event took is clearly written in the book of Genesis, and specifically, the King James version.
      What God's word teaches is clear.
      The only question is do you believe God's word or man's best guesses?
      Because this guy is not teaching science aka observed, tested, repeatable knowledge.
      He's choosing what seems most reasonable, and aligns best with the modern secular concessions.
      Literally, you have to presume the big bang happened before compiling various theories about when and how it happened, what was happening prior to it, what caused it, etc.
      Without your initial assumption that it happened, there is nothing to extrapolate upon.
      That means it's all fantasy.
      So, you tell me... What, exactly, have you actually learned from examining a long list of previous fantasies?
      And if you're a Christian, believe Christ. He created the world as is, in six days, approximately 6000 years ago.
      Personally, I chose to believe God's word... At least until it can be proven wrong.
      And His word, as always, has proven to be, by far, the most scientifically sustainable model of the universe's origin and creation.
      No model that begins with "billions of years ago" stands up to objective scrutiny.
      Just the observation of the many clues just inside this solar system defy and debunk that model...
      Dinosaur fossils, and fossils in general, have been proven to be but a few thousand years old, by numerous examples of the actual application of the scientific method.
      Evolutionists have only one good reason to deny science every time it defies evolution. They prefer to believe there is no Creator.
      But Christians don't have any good reason to deny both God and science.
      Peer pressure is not a good reason, btw.
      Leave God out of it and just stand by the actual unbiased, objective, tested and repeated observable facts.
      Bio matter has a half-life of about 520 years, tops. Period. End of discussion.
      Rescuing devises are not how science moves forward.
      The bible, ancient textual human history, archeology, fossils, and the objectivity of the scientific method, just to name a few, all favor God's word, at all times, and in all things.
      But Christians need to learn to trust God...
      At least until His word has been demonstrably proven wrong.
      If anyone could have done that, there would be no bible.
      It's loaded from top to bottom, side to side, cover to cover with specific people, places, things, times, dates, prophecies, world renowned events, and more...
      If it was all made up, it would be the easiest thing in the world to debunk.

    • @Mozart1220
      @Mozart1220 3 роки тому +8

      @@mitchellc4 And yet there is no credible evidence backing that up. God is a MYTH, and the entire story of "jesus" is taken from several earlier "pagan" religions.

  • @hermeticxhaote4723
    @hermeticxhaote4723 3 роки тому +97

    "For all we know, there are still things we don't."
    There will never be a time in human history where this isn't true.

    • @michealtaylor7745
      @michealtaylor7745 3 роки тому +3

      Yes we will. Tomorrow. Two mnths after your comment. We still don't know all shit.

    • @srobertweiser
      @srobertweiser 3 роки тому +4

      What I don’t know could fill Soldier Field.

    • @andrewferg8737
      @andrewferg8737 3 роки тому +1

      But we do know that all physical states are derived from previous states. And we do know of another class of object not requiring an initial state.

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 роки тому

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @Kiros37100
      @Kiros37100 3 роки тому +6

      @@mitchellc4 Why are you quoting entirely unrelated fiction books under a video about science?

  • @paulyadav2288
    @paulyadav2288 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for your honesty!

  • @anthonyat2401
    @anthonyat2401 Рік тому +2

    Another excellent presentation by Dr Don.

  • @aa-to6ws
    @aa-to6ws 4 роки тому +237

    "But before that, the universe was way hotter"
    Weren't we all?

    • @motog4221
      @motog4221 4 роки тому +11

      Hotter than that archer? I struggle to envisage such heat.

    • @davidm5707
      @davidm5707 4 роки тому +2

      @@motog4221 He means when we were younger, as well.

    • @motog4221
      @motog4221 4 роки тому +2

      @@davidm5707 and I mean that archer was hawt. Kazowie!

    • @Simon.the.Likeable
      @Simon.the.Likeable 4 роки тому +3

      May have been hotter but certainly lacking the complexity and depth which develop with curated aging.

    • @roddymcape7697
      @roddymcape7697 4 роки тому +2

      I always thought what happened before the Big Bang was Two and a Half Men, both created by the same producer....😁😁😁😁😷😷😷😷😷

  • @jameslai6879
    @jameslai6879 4 роки тому +121

    “I will never lie to you,” said on April 1st.

    • @c.augustin
      @c.augustin 4 роки тому +12

      Nope, was uploaded on 2020-03-31.

    • @VanBurenOfficial
      @VanBurenOfficial 4 роки тому +3

      @@c.augustin G O T T E M🥇💯🆒️

    • @c.augustin
      @c.augustin 4 роки тому +1

      @@VanBurenOfficial Ah, well, I forgot the ;-) - I was only half serious ;-)

    • @williesmith9832
      @williesmith9832 4 роки тому +1

      Still, a great comment 😅

    • @DDKKAY
      @DDKKAY 4 роки тому +3

      @@c.augustin but the comment is in 1st of April so the comment itself is a lie..😁😁

  • @durga61
    @durga61 Рік тому

    sir u r just an amazing and awesome explained of the toughest topics.u r funny and simply superb teacher.i love you.kerp doing this kind of interesting and knowkedgeble and mind blowing videos.

  • @melissagregory-oc5jq
    @melissagregory-oc5jq Рік тому

    Thank you for this show!

  • @MshadowsenseoC
    @MshadowsenseoC 4 роки тому +118

    I respect the fact that you won't lie about y'all not knowing.

    • @KrustyKlown
      @KrustyKlown 4 роки тому +21

      there already are far too many people with sacred books full of lies of knowledge

    • @kennethhicks2113
      @kennethhicks2113 4 роки тому +3

      Yes, something that should be taught in all disciplines starting in grade school.

    • @KrustyKlown
      @KrustyKlown 4 роки тому +13

      @Mike Doonsebury There a difference between Knowledge, Belief, Scientific Hypothesis, and a Scientific Theory. If you understood the difference, you wouldn't have posted your comment.
      Far too many people think a scientific hypothesis when stated, is something that scientists know to be true, or are asserting to be true. No, it's only a possibility they have reason to believe MAY be true, and do not have any verifiable evidence for it yet.

    • @eatersofdead
      @eatersofdead 4 роки тому +3

      @@KrustyKlown What you just stated is the Definition of a Theory. This guy in this video is stating as fact. That is falsifying evidence, in the name of Consensus Science. To me looses all credibility. Even with a Dr. at the beginning of his name.

    • @mattweston1212
      @mattweston1212 4 роки тому +9

      @@eatersofdead found someone who doesn't know the difference between theory as used colloquially and theory used in a scientific context. Shocker.

  • @ricardocastillo5485
    @ricardocastillo5485 4 роки тому +144

    What happened before the big bang, the short version:
    "Dunno".

    • @seelenwinter6662
      @seelenwinter6662 4 роки тому +8

      the only thing they know is, that they know nothing...

    • @RockinLoud360
      @RockinLoud360 4 роки тому +2

      PARTICLES!
      they did the smashing thing, very hot mmm spicy, then boom big expansion

    • @waynebow-gu7wr
      @waynebow-gu7wr 4 роки тому +9

      Michio Kaku is working on a theory that our big bang was caused by another universe.??? How much more BS do they think we are going to take.

    • @hunk2140
      @hunk2140 4 роки тому +2

      this has been answered in 2019 paper by Neurokinetikz..I Dunno why these scientists keep persisting on WE DUNNO..
      it's simple..dig in and get enlightened..
      Theoretical Implications
      Either the universe has the properties of a hologram.
      Or the hologram has the properties of a universe.
      What is the Universe?
      The universe is a black hole. And every black hole is a universe.
      The big bang is the collapse of our black hole into a singularity, creating a universe in its interior.
      The universe is a black hole contained in a parent universe with the same laws of physics and other black holes.
      The 7th dimension of string theory is the plane of possible universes with the same laws of physics but different initial conditions.

    • @OdinzEinherjar
      @OdinzEinherjar 4 роки тому

      Thanks, just as i suspected.

  • @gorber1971
    @gorber1971 Рік тому +1

    I love that you use 'Centigrade'. I still do it, but then change it to 'Celsius' because I don't think anybody will know what I'm talking about nowadays.

  • @stephken8077
    @stephken8077 Рік тому

    Fantastic post, thank you.

  • @meranism673
    @meranism673 4 роки тому +7

    For me this is the best channel on UA-cam to learn things about physics. Thanks for these valuable contents !

  • @alencosic3765
    @alencosic3765 4 роки тому +60

    "I's not a sin to not know something, it's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't." Well said Dr. Lincoln

    • @mattpotter8725
      @mattpotter8725 4 роки тому +3

      Someone tell this to Trump pleases!!!

    • @daieast6305
      @daieast6305 4 роки тому

      no such thing as a sin...science tends to learn most from its mistakes... and who the hay is doctor lincoln?

    • @daieast6305
      @daieast6305 4 роки тому +1

      @@mattpotter8725 that is below my pay grade

    • @alencosic3765
      @alencosic3765 4 роки тому +2

      @@daieast6305 The word "sin" here is meant more like a "mistake", he used it just to piss on religions. You don't know who doc is, really? Google him

    • @mattpotter8725
      @mattpotter8725 4 роки тому

      @@daieast6305 It's below everybody's pay grade, but I still wish someone would tell him, but then he thinks he knows everything better than everybody else. Maybe only his own daughter could tell him, he seems to listen to her.

  • @newton_planck
    @newton_planck 9 місяців тому

    one of the best videos i have seen.. i

  • @alexfedorov1071
    @alexfedorov1071 Рік тому +1

    Thank you )) I learned a few things from this video and my day is not waisted 😀

    • @-_-THINK-_-
      @-_-THINK-_- Рік тому

      Did you know God created the world?
      Did you also know a guy named Georges Lemaître, (1894-1966), Belgian cosmologist, Catholic priest came up with the idea of a big bang theory?
      The definition of ( theory ) is-
      a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained.
      "Darwin's theory of evolution is also just and idea some man had.
      In the 1920's is when the idea happen, and it's weird because he was a priest and if he read the Bible it says on the first page God created the world. Unless he didn't really believe the Bible and is one of the people the Bible talks about being a wolf in sheep's clothing deceiving people and causing confusion.
      Most people don't believe the Bible because they say it was written by man and it's wrong but instead some go and believe in nothing or in evolution and the big bang or both those together without the thought of God creating the world...
      Did you know the Bible says there's a number for man and it's the same number as the beast and the number is 666? How did someone thousands of years ago know that the number of man was 666 without DNA testing or the technology you'd need to know that? Because humans have carbon-12 in them which is made up of 6 protons 6 electrons and 6 neutrons and also Jesus and Lucifer where referred to as stars in the Bible and stars too also have carbon-12. How can they possibly know this information unless they where given the knowledge.
      But with all the confusion and lies in the world through time people lost the truth. Now we have people believing in other man's words about life and creation of earth and humans when they truly don't know and the Bible is the answer to those questions without a doubt if you are wide enough to understand what it says which everyone should because God is not the author of confusion...
      We all need to put are faith and trust back into God and his only begotten son Jesus Christ.
      For God so loved the world he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believeth on him will not perish but have everlasting life
      He died on the cross and rose again to save us all from sin cause by the devil.
      Peace and love to everyone who reads this.
      JESUS IS THE WAY THE TRUTH AND THE LIFE NO ONE CAN GET TO THE FATHER BUT BY HIM.

    • @shanebailey9128
      @shanebailey9128 Місяць тому

      But Not how to spell!

  • @ThuyTran-ci2et
    @ThuyTran-ci2et 2 роки тому +8

    This is such a great video explaining very complex ideas to the general public. Thank you ! I just subscribed based on the quality of this vid.

  • @astrodude7306
    @astrodude7306 4 роки тому +10

    I teach astronomy and this still blows my mind

  • @kensanity178
    @kensanity178 Рік тому +3

    In high school, I lit up a cherry bomb and heard a big bang. Then I joined the Army, went to Vietnam, and heard a really big bang. How big you talkin?

  • @rickbear7249
    @rickbear7249 Рік тому +1

    It would be wonderful if you would take the time to create a video explaining what is meant by 10 to the minus whatever in easy to understand terms. You have a wonderful skill at making these complex physics ideas intelligible. Just that you're relying upon mathematics that needs similar very approachable explanations, for people to follow your other wonderful explanations.
    I used to understand this stuff (many years ago) while others who don't have a scientific/mathematics/engineering background would really benefit, and you'd be far more successful in enlightening us all.
    Thank you, Rick

    • @isaac1572
      @isaac1572 Рік тому

      Agreed , just state it in years and lightyears.

    • @montagdp
      @montagdp Рік тому +1

      10^-N means a number less than 1 with N-1 zeros after the decimal. For example, 10^-3 = 0.001. It's the same as saying 1/10^3 or 1/1000.

    • @zigamuswizard9731
      @zigamuswizard9731 Рік тому +1

      Scientists claim that the formation of the bulk of the universe happened all at once, from a small size to vast in ONE SECOND! The numbers they are saying are for the tiniest fractions of a second where everything was getting bigger. They claim that they can get into the last 1/6th (about) of that first second, but they can't go any further back toward actual 0.

  • @Manguadesignz
    @Manguadesignz 3 роки тому +52

    Subbed simply because i genuinely learned with no ads

  • @prashantmishra1994
    @prashantmishra1994 2 роки тому +25

    Hi Don! It was informative video for everyone.That's because,you explained to us in a clear and concise way.
    Thanks & regards.

    • @gtechnosinc2518
      @gtechnosinc2518 Рік тому

      yes, can you get something from nothing?try it, do your experiment idiot.

  • @damaddog8065
    @damaddog8065 Рік тому +1

    Nice work.

  • @FistandFootMartialArts
    @FistandFootMartialArts Рік тому

    One thing I learned is that I have to watch that again, at least once. LOL
    Prolly more. ;-)

  • @Romogi
    @Romogi 3 роки тому +71

    'I will never lie to you'. Humility is a requirement for good science.

    • @paulweeldreyer7457
      @paulweeldreyer7457 3 роки тому +5

      And desperately lacking today. Just look at how the lab leak hypothesis was treated (lied about).

    • @michaelbee2165
      @michaelbee2165 2 роки тому

      @@HamhocksUnlimited It's not any different from Mengele actually.

    • @maryjane1085
      @maryjane1085 2 роки тому

      It's usually something that is often said by liars actually - otherwise why would they feel the need to say it - other than to reassure the gullible...

    • @1970Phoenix
      @1970Phoenix 2 роки тому +3

      @@HamhocksUnlimited I'm trying to work out if you are a troll or just uneducated (I suspect its the latter).
      Its perfectly reasonable and entirely honest to say there exists a consensus if indeed a consensus does exist. There are many scientific explanations for which there is indisputably a consensus. Biological evolution and the Big Bang are two such examples. It may be that you personally don't like those explanations because (perhaps) they conflict with your preferred religious narrative, but it is demonstrably true that they represent the scientific consensus on those issues.

    • @cindysantillan5278
      @cindysantillan5278 2 роки тому

      November yeah

  • @bandotasif
    @bandotasif 4 роки тому +81

    I love how Dr. Lincoln explains these things. The available information is very well presented. If he was my teacher when I was much younger I almost certainly would have gone into theoretical physics, the wonderment of science. Amazing.

    • @gernothartung
      @gernothartung 4 роки тому +3

      word

    • @herrschmidt5477
      @herrschmidt5477 4 роки тому +4

      He never explain anything really in detail. Most of the time it's "we know this and that"

    • @SEVideoQuant
      @SEVideoQuant 4 роки тому +11

      Herr Schmidt Maybe because he must summarize in 20 Minutes a 7000 pages textbook...?

    • @herrschmidt5477
      @herrschmidt5477 4 роки тому +2

      @@SEVideoQuant no he must not^^

    • @SEVideoQuant
      @SEVideoQuant 4 роки тому +1

      Herr Schmidt LoL

  • @phyllis9750
    @phyllis9750 Рік тому +1

    Thank heavens that your son is thinking about this! We need him😉

  • @bigredracingdog466
    @bigredracingdog466 11 місяців тому

    7:41 "It's not a sin to not know something; it's only a sin to think you do when you clearly don't."
    That quote alone was worth the price of admission.

  • @craiggrocott7559
    @craiggrocott7559 4 роки тому +72

    “I would rather have questions that can’t be answered than answers that can’t be questioned”.

    • @spyeatte
      @spyeatte 3 роки тому +1

      @Larry Chappell The elephant in the room is that before the big bang there was nothing (no time, no space, no mass, no energy). Genesis 1:1 - In the beginning God created... The physical laws of time and space, and the relationship of mass and energy, and all atomic values defined in the first microsecond. Since God created them he operated outside those parameters and is in no way limited by them in any way. So what was before the big bang we can never know...until we die and then it won't matter.
      Apparently the universe is a one-time event. It was created, will exist for a period of time (approximately 145 billion years) then the "Big Rip" will end it all with all mass reduced to sub-atomic particles and be rolled up like a scroll.

    • @moderntechnology7010
      @moderntechnology7010 3 роки тому

      tru

    • @vercingetorix3414
      @vercingetorix3414 3 роки тому

      @@spyeatte So Genesis is your science textbook?
      The flood
      Tower of Babel
      Adam and Eve
      Talking serpents
      The Nephili
      The children of God mating with the daughters of men
      etc.
      Are part of your science curriculum?

    • @karnobot9814
      @karnobot9814 3 роки тому +1

      @@spyeatte here is why religion is so toxic to people. They think Pretending to know the unknown is knowing and make unsubstantiated claims is virtuous as long as its made in the name of diety and religion

    • @MC-ur6qv
      @MC-ur6qv 2 роки тому +1

      @@karnobot9814 Yep. They try to explain stuff that can be explained with science, given time, with some crazy idea of an all powerful being creating everything and when they’re is a legit good point against religion they point to faith

  • @jimmycburfield5997
    @jimmycburfield5997 3 роки тому +4

    Bringing the light of knowledge! Combing curiosity with scientific enquiry.
    Good stuff

  • @mozzy76
    @mozzy76 2 місяці тому

    amazing and top notch clear explanation, thanks!

  • @clydeblair9622
    @clydeblair9622 8 місяців тому

    Best presetation ever on this subject.

  • @rage9715
    @rage9715 4 роки тому +3

    Your content is easy to digest and gets me more interested in the topics kudos.

  • @colebizwell5407
    @colebizwell5407 4 роки тому +146

    "But that would be a lie, and I'll never lie to you"
    *sniff*
    *thanks don*

    • @Aurinkohirvi
      @Aurinkohirvi 4 роки тому +4

      Next sentence: I think I can hear my lab calling.
      Yeah, do you, really?

    • @texasnewt
      @texasnewt 3 роки тому +2

      Scientists are always truthful, never corrupted like, say global warming or the COVID-19 scamdemic, ...

    • @MC-ur6qv
      @MC-ur6qv 2 роки тому +2

      @@texasnewt Global warming is real and so is Covid.

  • @daleandrews3552
    @daleandrews3552 Рік тому

    I'm a fairly intelligent person holding bachelor degrees in biology (with a minor in chemistry), medical technology, and nursing, in that order. I'm a retired R.N. about 10 years now. In all that schooling, I thereby have an almost total science background. Out of all that science, I've only had 2 courses in physics that didn't require calculus. Those 2 courses would be Physical Chemistry, which are the booger bears of physics courses! I guess that explains why I was only able to fully comprehend his concepts. I really need to go back and watch the video again to try to comprehend those parts that went over my head! To be honest, I was humbled by this presentation. I rarely run across anything I read or see that goes completely over my head. 🤔

    • @panzerblitz2140
      @panzerblitz2140 Рік тому

      It goes over your head because it's complete 🐂 It's intended to be incomprehensible so you will buy into their religious dogma and they can get more funding.

  • @michaeldow8470
    @michaeldow8470 8 місяців тому +1

    Should be "as far as we know" or "to the best of our knowledge"

    • @MemekingJag
      @MemekingJag 8 місяців тому

      We could qualify everything with that though, absolute knowledge just doesn't exist. We could all be brains floating in vats, or simulated computer programs, but we still think it's appropriate to investigate and disseminate what we know about the reality we experience, even if that's just 'to the best of our knowledge'.

  • @badcamred8824
    @badcamred8824 3 роки тому +68

    Just want to say, I appreciate that there are men and women out there like Dr. Lincoln who are dedicating their lives to unraveling life's greatest mystery.

    • @jonb6417
      @jonb6417 3 роки тому +8

      ... and wasting their time fabricating theories.

    • @Ryan-eu3kp
      @Ryan-eu3kp 3 роки тому +10

      @@jonb6417 you are clueless

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 роки тому +1

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @Ryan-eu3kp
      @Ryan-eu3kp 3 роки тому +6

      @@mitchellc4 Koo Koo!!! 🤣

    • @shermie_65
      @shermie_65 3 роки тому +5

      @@mitchellc4 nope, thats not it...

  • @ccchhhrrriiisss100
    @ccchhhrrriiisss100 4 роки тому +14

    When I was a kid, one of my classmates used to argue that our universe (and its expansion) is simply the other side of some other parallel universe's black hole. We debated and argued over this idea throughout the fifth grade.

    • @YCCCm7
      @YCCCm7 4 роки тому +3

      As the saying goes: "If you can't show it, you don't know it." I will admit I've had the same idea myself, and it's a fun one, but there's problems about the questions of energy quantity and why black holes don't seem to lose any coherent level of mass, although the search for Hawking radiation is still on.

    • @thomasmaughan4798
      @thomasmaughan4798 4 роки тому +1

      Janet Jeppsen (Mrs Isaac Asimov) wrote a novel about that very idea. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janet_Asimov "The Last Immortal" (1980) (as J. O. Jeppson)

    • @shaunhumphreys6714
      @shaunhumphreys6714 4 роки тому +3

      that's the holographic principle, based on information thought to be imprinted on a black hole's event horizon, which was established as the solution to the information paradox by stephen hawking i think. Then speculation arose that the same thing could apply to our whole universe, all the universe as information imprinted on a two dimensional hologram, either encircling our universe or imprinted on a black hole's event horizon. This encouraged further speculation taking the idea to its most extreme conclusion-the simulation hypothesis. Holographic principle though merely speculative is way more sensible than the latter. But that's only relatively speaking.
      They are both fringe ideas. Indeed two experiments have been done to test for the holographic principle, one was to test for the equivalent of pixels in the structure of space-time. If this is holographic, then space will be pixelated. However so far no pixelation has been found. Another experiment, this one non lab based, used telescopes to measure the journey of different types of electromagnetic waves, specifically if space-time is not a smooth membrane like medium, then Fermi's LAT would have detected a significant time lag between the arrival of the lowest-energy and highest-energy gamma rays. In fact, to within one part in 100 million billion, the two photons traveled at the same speed. Many approaches to new theories of gravity picture space-time as having a shifting, frothy structure at physical scales trillions of times smaller than an electron. Some models predict that the foamy aspect of space-time will cause higher-energy gamma rays to move slightly more slowly than photons at lower energy.
      Such a model would violate Einstein's edict that all electromagnetic radiation -- radio waves, infrared, visible light, X-rays and gamma rays -- travels through a vacuum at the same speed.
      Fermi showed that pixelation or rough 'texture' in space-time may not exist at all. So far the smoothness of the space-time continuum has been confirmed. So that's NO to the holographic principle or simulation hypothesis. It confirms the aether/vacuum conventional idea, supported by Einstein and his predecessors which describes spacetime as euclidean.
      However all this fringe speculation, especially occupying populist 'science' circles, started with the information paradox black hole problem, which I'm not satisfied is solved, and I don't even think it's that great a problem-energy can't be created or destroyed, information can't be lost. These rules may not apply in extreme situations e.g. at the high energy and temperatures just after time equals zero st the big bang our laws of physics did not apply. And similarly things break down in black holes-which are the most extreme predictions derived from General relativity's mathematics-all the tensor and vector calculus. the schwarzschild metric and the kerr metric describes the physics of black holes, and it's pretty crazy,the maths says in a kerr black hole you can visit your own past. Black holes spin space and time. All real black holes are spinning black holes. The angular momentum of the star thay collapsed, plus the material the black hole devows, even at a quantum level, the angular momentum of every fermion and boson means black holes always rotate. A paper in the astrophysical journal detailed how gamma ray bursts seem to produce superluminal motion, with superluminal gamma waves being time reversed.. gamma ray burst only happen in very extreme cosmological events and therefore are another example of where our laws of physics may break down to produce faster than light travel through space under that unique condition. iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab3bdf

    • @TotalGAMIX
      @TotalGAMIX 3 роки тому

      It doesn't make sense cause what would've caused that universe. And then that universe and then that and then that and then that universe. There must be a beginning

    • @briandolan2224
      @briandolan2224 Рік тому +1

      Pretty cool dialog for 5th graders! In 5th grade I spent most of my time avoiding cooties and trying to figure out why those creatures called girls were starting to be interesting!

  • @bustardrichard
    @bustardrichard Рік тому +1

    On the smashing of 2 lead nuclei together
    What kind of thermometer did you, in fact, use to measure such tremnegous temperature golly

  • @drijazdurrani
    @drijazdurrani Місяць тому

    Awesomely riveting Dr DON LINCOLN. Can't get better!!

  • @Kastor774
    @Kastor774 4 роки тому +41

    Optimists: The glass is half full
    Pessimists: The glass is half empty
    Dr. Lincoln: Suppose you have a container that had both air and water

  • @ozzyzee1770
    @ozzyzee1770 3 роки тому +66

    What a pleasant, likeable chap. Very well explained

  • @markramsay6399
    @markramsay6399 Рік тому

    Thanks, really interesting.

  • @michelebriere9569
    @michelebriere9569 Рік тому

    I need a link to get that t-shirt.

  • @jimeldred772
    @jimeldred772 3 роки тому +3

    I appreciate your honesty. I enjoy listening to your knowledge about our universe.

  • @MillerFourFingers
    @MillerFourFingers 3 роки тому +11

    When a scientist says "We don't know" respect goes up.

    • @davidwayne8336
      @davidwayne8336 3 роки тому +2

      And when religious-ists claim they know something, the opposite happens.

    • @alexamaya3208
      @alexamaya3208 3 роки тому +1

      @@davidwayne8336 Claiming to know the answer to something isn’t disreputable in and of itself. It’s the answer you seem to have a bias against, and therefore a hostility that lowers your respect for any theist. But there are perfectly reasonable reasons why we believe God caused the Big Bang, such as the first mover argument. Or the uncaused cause

    • @MC-ur6qv
      @MC-ur6qv 2 роки тому

      @@alexamaya3208 Don’t take that guy as an example for all thiests. Believe it or not some of us think they’re may be something after death, we just don’t believe in a particular god.

    • @michaelbee2165
      @michaelbee2165 2 роки тому +1

      @@davidwayne8336 But only from unbelievers. We can share the Gospel but only a fool says there is no God. That is from Psalms. And if we share, that person's salvation is not our responsibility. It is between that person and God, not between me and the unbeliever. So you see, I am commanded to share the gospel but not responsible. You are neither, but insist on demanding believers betray Jesus Christ. I pray you come to recognize His call.

    • @michaelbee2165
      @michaelbee2165 2 роки тому

      @@alexamaya3208 Very well stated. Factual and reasonable.

  • @richardsttati317
    @richardsttati317 10 місяців тому

    Thank you for such fantastic information… and I pray 🤲 to God to give us a convincing answer while we are still alive…Amen

  • @markhuebner7580
    @markhuebner7580 11 місяців тому

    Very nice! Much more reality than I am used to seeing!

  • @PoombaCaka
    @PoombaCaka 3 роки тому +3

    Just come across your channel Doc and it’s the best most informative channel told in layman’s terms so really understandable.
    I look forward to your coming videos and browsing through your many previous ones. Thank you so much.
    B ⭐️👽🌍🛸 👍🏼❤️

    • @id70b40
      @id70b40 3 роки тому +1

      Seagulls

    • @danstroud1
      @danstroud1 2 роки тому

      See you up the Amex to discuss big bang theory. Up the Seagulls 😂

  • @aaronseet2738
    @aaronseet2738 4 роки тому +55

    "It's a sin to think you do when you clearly don't."
    I see this sin committed all around me practically everyday.

    • @rhabdob3895
      @rhabdob3895 4 роки тому

      Well at least it’s not adultery.

    • @larswadefalk6423
      @larswadefalk6423 4 роки тому +7

      Definition of religion.

    • @6862ptc
      @6862ptc 4 роки тому +2

      @@larswadefalk6423 Exactly, they think they know what can't be known. Then condemn science.

    • @jeromegoodwin3848
      @jeromegoodwin3848 4 роки тому

      Sin merely means "Short Comings" so everyone has Sin.

    • @filiusvivam4315
      @filiusvivam4315 4 роки тому

      @@6862ptc that's a false. stop being a bigot.

  • @4DRC_
    @4DRC_ Рік тому

    Is getting data from before 10^-13 just a matter of building a bigger accelerator or is there some energy limit we cant cross?

  • @Arseniy_Afanasyev
    @Arseniy_Afanasyev Рік тому

    Thank you for video!
    That's really interestig what the strong nuclear force has to do with inflation ?

  • @henrikpersson1962
    @henrikpersson1962 4 роки тому +23

    I think all of this is confusing to me, still I'm watching it.

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 роки тому

      == The Conglomerate - Universe Creation Theory (combining GOD, General Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and Chaos Theory)
      "The BIG Bang-Bit Bang inflation/expansion of energy and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our 'parent universe'. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density in a ‘Cosmic Egg’ birth of this and all universes within 'The Conglomerate': multiverse without random bubble universes and parallel worlds. Our Universe is inside the Planck density of that SBH and shares the same event horizon. That SBH-SWH seed phase transition was a 'quantum tunneling umbilical wormhole' with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion 'self-similar offspring' each with the same inherited physical laws (‘DNA’). This simple cause-and-effect cycle/'circle of life' - birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth - explains both infinite space and eternity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s simplest plan for spreading life for everything from cells to universes." - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com

      This has triggered The Apocalypse/Revelation which is not the ‘end of the world‘ - it‘s the 2nd Coming (E=mc²).

    • @pokerilaama8864
      @pokerilaama8864 3 роки тому

      Me too.

  • @another3997
    @another3997 2 роки тому +60

    The problem is that we only have a small sample size, taken over a tiny period of time, and from one infinitesimally small spot in the universe. Our perspective is fixed, and we have to make many assumptions based only on the tiny snippets of information we can collect at that point. It's like sampling the air one inch above the ground outside your front door for a week, and then trying to describe the whole of the Earth's atmosphere in minute detail, just from those readings. Yet even with millions of weather measurements taken around the globe every day, dozens of weather satellites in orbit, and vast amounts of computing power running simulations, we still don't have the granularity to accurately predict the exact conditions at that one spot at any point in time. Now imagine this on a universal scale.

    • @lloydperry9227
      @lloydperry9227 Рік тому +1

      And what if our assumptions are totally wrong?

    • @pauljack7170
      @pauljack7170 Рік тому

      How true ! Humans are overfilled of fake certitudes

    • @TheHulabob
      @TheHulabob Рік тому +1

      James Webb surprised everyone

    • @TheHulabob
      @TheHulabob Рік тому

      The
      Big bang .was different when the deep infra red james webb telescope shook up the science tists when they did not see what they thought they should see

    • @TheHulabob
      @TheHulabob Рік тому

      Holy moly there's hundreds of comments

  • @negativeman896
    @negativeman896 Рік тому +1

    That's a very attractive archer in your video. The science stuff is pretty keen as well.

  • @humbertothebeliever2443
    @humbertothebeliever2443 Рік тому +3

    Before the mountains were born or you brought forth the whole world, from everlasting to everlasting you are God....Psalm 90 verse 2

  • @arthurhunt642
    @arthurhunt642 3 роки тому +32

    This is absolutely the most interesting video I think I've seen on this subject. This is dealing with our universe. Heavy on the word "our".

    • @-f8884
      @-f8884 2 роки тому +2

      You mean MY Universe. You exist in my Universe pal. You should be so lucky.

    • @Paul-hl8yg
      @Paul-hl8yg 2 роки тому

      We ARE Universe!! 🇬🇧

  • @jamesdong8179
    @jamesdong8179 4 роки тому +232

    video title: What happened before the Big Bang?
    me: well, obviously the Big Foreplay

    • @roddymcape7697
      @roddymcape7697 4 роки тому

      Two and a Half Men before and Young Sheldon later....

    • @olivernald
      @olivernald 4 роки тому +6

      Our universe on my wild guess was a product of a very large black hole which reach its maximum compression of singularity causing it to explode as the big bang.

    • @jamesdong8179
      @jamesdong8179 4 роки тому +3

      @@olivernald I have a few black holes in mind. Some are a bit on the brown side though

    • @jaxxonbalboa3243
      @jaxxonbalboa3243 4 роки тому +1

      There is no before...the BB is a perpetual. This means the entire universe is constantly recycling itself...it's a process machine.

    • @speedy-cc
      @speedy-cc 4 роки тому +2

      El basho. best comment on utube. Legend 😅🤣

  • @richardlingo4055
    @richardlingo4055 Рік тому

    when I saw the title my first thought was There is no "before"

  • @carlcapello9956
    @carlcapello9956 Рік тому

    I like these videos about the universe and what happened before the big bang and after the big bang. It is something that boggles the mind and mystifies the brain and to think who or what started this phenomenon and why. I think we are in the birth of time and need to learn so much more about this universe it will probably take more than a lifetime to learn all that the universe has to offer. We are probably looking at 1000's of years before we learn what we need to know about the universe.

    • @mysticwine
      @mysticwine Рік тому

      Here's something to know about the universe: it's 90% invisible....just saying

  • @Galacoo
    @Galacoo 3 роки тому +270

    "i was a cute baby" nice try, we all know you were born 54

    • @blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517
      @blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517 3 роки тому +10

      @MesohornyMeloveulongtime idk but man I can’t stop laughing

    • @JamesBond-ml3zp
      @JamesBond-ml3zp 3 роки тому +3

      @@blackscreennoiseforrelaxat1517 Boy this guy got Game!! He's probably got Tons of Women, waiting outside his Tent on the Sidewalk!!

    • @BradWatsonMiami
      @BradWatsonMiami 3 роки тому +1

      == The Conglomerate of Universes - Universe Creation Theory ==
      combining GOD/Nature, GOD=7_4 or Fod=6_4 theory, ancient religions, astronomy, cosmology, fined-tuned laws of physics/general relativity/quantum mechanics, chaos theory/fractals, laws of biology & chemistry, linguistics/code-breaking, programming the Universe, mysticism, and philosophy

      "Energy can’t be created or destroyed, only transformed/transferred in an isolated system." General relativity allows black holes, white holes and Big Bang.

      ‘The BIG Bang-Bit Bang’ inflation/expansion of energy₇₄ and information into the void 13.8 billion years ago was a supermassive white hole spawned by a supermassive black hole at the heart of a galaxy in our ‘parent₇₄ universe’. This duality combines general relativity’s singularities of infinite density breaking through spacetime in ‘Cosmic Egg hatchings’ of all created universes within ‘The Conglomerate’: multiverse with no random quantum fluctuation bubble universes, no parallel worlds, and no universes with different physical laws. Our Universe is 1-in-2 trillion ‘self-similar offspring’ each with the same inherited ‘DNA’.

      “In the beginning”, the Planck density of the core of a SBH is a birth canal. ‘Quantum bounce SBH-SWH seed transitions’ are ‘quantum tunneling umbilical wormholes’ with energy-matter and data transformed/transferred, albeit scrambled and encoded. The ubiquitous cause-and-effect ‘circle of life cycle’: birth-life-death-transformation-rebirth explains infinite space and eternity - a necessity. Reproduction is GOD/Nature’s plan for greatly spreading life from cells to universes. GOD=7_4 or FOD=6_4 is the #1 program₇₄/law/initial₇₄ condition (GOD704.fandom.com ).

      Why does this Universe exist? It’s our playground (god + run = ground₆₄).

      - Seal #1a of the 7seals.blogspot.com . Only the returned Christ & Albert Einstein reincarnated could produce this - it's triggered The Apocalypse/ Revelation which is NOT the 'end of the world'. COVID-19 is part of Seal #4: S=19 (18.6) Theory.

    • @jefflittle8913
      @jefflittle8913 3 роки тому

      54? I am not sure I get the reference. The opposite of 45?

    • @aaronbaddestqueen7713
      @aaronbaddestqueen7713 3 роки тому

      Lmao

  • @marqgoldberg7454
    @marqgoldberg7454 2 роки тому +22

    I may have to listen to this video 100 before I absorb all of its content. He communicates EXTREMEMY well; but single sentences often contain 3 or more complex ideas that have to be understood individually before connecting them together so as to grasp the meaning of the entire sentence. Each successive sentence then builds upon what preceded it. It's a struggle for me but an immensely rewarding one.

    • @johnjepsen4243
      @johnjepsen4243 Рік тому

      It's science fiction. Bull feces.

    • @marqgoldberg7454
      @marqgoldberg7454 Рік тому +1

      @@johnjepsen4243 do you believe Jesus magiced it up? I guess that's easier. But you never get to learn anything worthwhile.

    • @schechter01
      @schechter01 Рік тому

      "extrememy"?

    • @daleandrews3552
      @daleandrews3552 Рік тому

      Read my post above, Marq!

    • @charlesx593
      @charlesx593 Рік тому

      @@Dawn-Songs Genesis tells us what happened science is trying to discover how it happened.

  • @sussekind9717
    @sussekind9717 8 місяців тому

    "I hear the lab calling." I know that sound.

  • @wade5941
    @wade5941 Рік тому

    I enjoy your presentation style. Too many get overly theatrical which detracts from the information.

  • @jamestracey2006
    @jamestracey2006 3 роки тому +12

    I love these videos, as it gets me thinking about the universe, and just how complex everything is! I wish I had paid more attention at school, especially to the science classes

    • @MaryAnnNytowl
      @MaryAnnNytowl 2 роки тому +1

      It's never too late to learn!

    • @kamion53
      @kamion53 2 роки тому

      I paid attention in school, but the basic highschool fysics was pretty hard for me, so I give all the credit to Dr. Lincoln explaining this much more complicated stuff in such a way I can follow it.

  • @Hajime319
    @Hajime319 4 роки тому +128

    “You’re so hot even physics don’t apply to you

    • @ceelo826
      @ceelo826 4 роки тому +7

      Underappreciated comment right here

    • @icetea52
      @icetea52 4 роки тому +10

      Damn that's smooth.

    • @kallah4999
      @kallah4999 4 роки тому +3

      Wow, thanks brah. I'm not gay though. Sorry, didn't mean to hurt your feelings buddy...

    • @gregandcindygingerich9615
      @gregandcindygingerich9615 4 роки тому +2

      Well, since he’s speaking of a point in TIME at 10 to the -48 seconds, in other words pretty effing early in the history of the universe, I think it could also be said, “You’re so fresh the laws of physics don’t apply to you! “ Just another scientifically observed option...

    • @m.a2894
      @m.a2894 4 роки тому +1

      Wait did Vsauce said that

  • @omahanb1
    @omahanb1 Рік тому

    We might not know but wow so close. I enjoy watching and speculating about .001 ; you bring it where I can imagine in my wonder. There could never be a negative .0 ?

  • @ericjohnson5969
    @ericjohnson5969 Рік тому

    I saw something about 40 years ago that described the universe as an incredibly rare random fluctuation in the curvature of spacetime.

  • @RonaldModesitt
    @RonaldModesitt 4 роки тому +12

    Thank you for another great physics video! During most of your videos you are standing in front of a black board with all kinds of calculations, that really intrigue me. I know the black board is primarily for show. But, I wonder if you would consider discussing the black board and some of the equations that are pertinent?

    • @RonaldModesitt
      @RonaldModesitt 4 роки тому +1

      @Slippery Storm Funny, Don doesn't look like one of those kind of guys!

    • @RonaldModesitt
      @RonaldModesitt 4 роки тому +1

      @Slippery Storm Careful Slippery, you're gonna get us in trouble!

    • @TheFlyingBrain.
      @TheFlyingBrain. 2 роки тому

      That would require imagining that the viewer is capable of thinking beyond the surface of things, and that is just something that isn't done in the case of videos like these. It's much easier to provide the appearance of teaching, than it is to actually TEACH.

  • @raymcconnell1075
    @raymcconnell1075 2 роки тому +43

    Thank you Dr. Lincoln. You are one of the best science communicators of our age. Keep the videos coming!

  • @DelhiMan-xb8nm
    @DelhiMan-xb8nm Рік тому

    Excellent lecture

  • @ejgoldguru
    @ejgoldguru Рік тому

    i wish i'd had an instructor like you when i was an undergrad -- at 81 and very published, i still know nothing.

  • @tedskins
    @tedskins 3 роки тому +14

    These are the kind of videos you watch at 3 AM

    • @raditzsuper9782
      @raditzsuper9782 3 роки тому

      lol 😂

    • @absolutelynothing3621
      @absolutelynothing3621 3 роки тому

      I am watching at 730 am

    • @whambamcantacam1042
      @whambamcantacam1042 3 роки тому

      1 am here

    • @mitchellc4
      @mitchellc4 3 роки тому

      The gospel is the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM!
      Jesus is going to return and set up the kingdom of God ON THE EARTH! God’s government ON THE EARTH! God resurrected the Messiah! The Messiah will resurrect his people! The destiny of the Messiah and his people is to be ON THE EARTH! The renewed restored earth! God also dwelling with them! Rev 21
      Jesus said the Father is the only true God!
      John 17
      3 And this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.

    • @absolutelynothing3621
      @absolutelynothing3621 3 роки тому

      @@mitchellc4 what relevance does that have with what we were saying?

  • @astroboy7712
    @astroboy7712 2 роки тому +6

    Dr. Don Lincoln - Thank You!!!! I'm watching your Great Courses Series... I find it just awesome that folks like Dr. Don care enough to take the time to "translate" this cool knowledge and information to the proletarians... Sooo cool... I'm hooked... forget rock stars... and actors... Don is the real star!!! thanks!

  • @patkovskyi
    @patkovskyi Рік тому

    If time is relative to the observer/frame of reference, how can we talk about "seconds" after Big Bang? What reference frame is this?

  • @genova2006
    @genova2006 Рік тому

    Could it be the universe was in a wrong side out state previous to time = zero? As in a number scale. Right of zero is +. Left is -
    Great channel. Enjoying listening.

  • @verrenus
    @verrenus 3 роки тому +4

    Thanks Dr Lincoln...great video ... and I like the T Shirts.

  • @Iceman-xx1kh
    @Iceman-xx1kh 3 роки тому +15

    Let's hope the James Webb can get safely up and bring sooo much more.

    • @mlmimichaellucasmontereyin6765
      @mlmimichaellucasmontereyin6765 3 роки тому

      Yes!!! Now. I give 10:1 odds that the view is at least 10x "bigger" than before. Zo send me your bet & I will start an escrow account to cover it. O...BTW, there R so many shibboleths in this BS video that I will refuse to accept wagers from those of you who believe any of the absurdities claimed about all that BS about what exists beyond what real science can study (etc.).

  • @timothybaariu6467
    @timothybaariu6467 Рік тому

    Very insightful

  • @nobodynowhere7163
    @nobodynowhere7163 Місяць тому

    Where was this guy when I was learning physics in college!?!?