Back to The Future Part 2 | Canadians First Time Watching | Review & React | Just a chaotic fun mess

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 789

  • @CineBingeReact
    @CineBingeReact  3 роки тому +78

    hey lovely youtube peoples! just fyi, our comments are getting disabled by the higher ups (we are trying to stay on top of it) so if you notice that you can't comment on this video, find one of our other ones and let us know! we want to be able to hear from you!

    • @Uncle_T
      @Uncle_T 3 роки тому +1

      Just wrote on FB to tell you they were once again blocked but reloaded the video and now they work.

    • @goneetfierdeletre4032
      @goneetfierdeletre4032 3 роки тому +1

      Hey lovely reacters Hi from Lyon - France ^^ Really ? ? You doesnt go to the credits end ? Lol you have a trailer of BTTF 3 ;)
      I want see you react to rain man :)

    • @mataneren3852
      @mataneren3852 3 роки тому +1

      I have a suggesten for you please react to the movie "The Godfather".

    • @ericy4522
      @ericy4522 3 роки тому

      This was a SUPER fun reaction to watch! Your speculations about the time implications, the amusement at "2015", the social norms in 1955, etc. Absolutely LOL! Keep up the good work 😂

    • @maunawiliboy
      @maunawiliboy 3 роки тому +5

      When are you guys going to watch Back to the Future 3? It's better than 2.

  • @jowbloe3673
    @jowbloe3673 3 роки тому +170

    Don't think it snapped because he used the wrong wrench. I think the 1955 Doc realized he needed a 3/4 inch wrench when the 5/8 inch wrench didn't work, and the 1985 Doc remembered he initially grabbed the wrong wrench, so nothing of significance changes there. Like ripples in a pond, small things flatten out quickly, larger things have more of an effect.

    • @MDStallings7
      @MDStallings7 3 роки тому +18

      Yea it was the tree branch that fell on the cable that caused it to disconnect.

    • @G1NZOU
      @G1NZOU 3 роки тому +13

      This, and also 1985 Doc would know that 1955 Doc would look up and go up to the toolbox when he realised the wrench was wrong, so anticipating that meant he kept focusing on his work and didn't look directly at 1985 Doc.

    • @kriscynical
      @kriscynical 2 роки тому +5

      I just want to add the brilliance of the score's title for this scene: _"Pair o' Docs."_

    • @Cheepchipsable
      @Cheepchipsable 2 роки тому +3

      Events revolved around the lightning strike on the clock, so provided the Doc had the cable connected, their interaction wouldn't have made any difference. The wire didn't break, it used a plug and socket. When the Doc was on the clocktower he unplugged the lower cable by yanking it too hard.
      Using the wrong wrench would just mean he couldn't tighten the nut and he would have to get the correct size. 5/8 would be too small - 5/8 vs 6/8 to make it obvious.
      Don't forget the "new" 1985 Doc would remember having helped Marty return to the future from 1955.
      1985 Doc just remembered he had the wrong wrench 30 years ago.

    • @shawnmiller4781
      @shawnmiller4781 Рік тому +1

      Sounds like a problem that could have been avoided with an adjustable spanner or crescent wrench

  • @ectoburger6822
    @ectoburger6822 3 роки тому +276

    The whole glitchy Reagan (and others) in the diner is a nod to Max Headroom. A weird TV thing (personality and eventually show) from the 80'S did exactly that. It was part of the whole act to make it more convincing it was a completely computerized AI being, and not just some actor in heavy makeup. It's obvious now, but apparently it fooled a number of people in the 80s who weren't used to that sort of thing.

    • @Xoferif
      @Xoferif 3 роки тому +21

      If you're into 80s cyberpunk, be sure to check out the original UK Max Headroom pilot, "20 Minutes Into The Future". It's wonderfully bleak and gritty!
      (Rumour has it that there are a couple of bootleg copies floating around on UA-cam...)

    • @artao5
      @artao5 3 роки тому +3

      Beat me to it ;)

    • @ectoburger6822
      @ectoburger6822 3 роки тому +5

      @@Xoferif Interesting. I do have the 14 episode TV series on DVD, but haven't seen this UK pilot it was adapted from. I'll have to check that out as well.

    • @TheMsLourdes
      @TheMsLourdes 3 роки тому +1

      @@ectoburger6822 It's out there, I have it and its gorgeous.

    • @TheMsLourdes
      @TheMsLourdes 3 роки тому +2

      They really need to go full meta and review twenty minutes into the future :)

  • @visionaryventures12
    @visionaryventures12 3 роки тому +241

    The first movie was only a one-time thing. The end tag was a joke, but it paved the way to planning two sequels to be written and filmed back to back. That’s why the second movie had a tag preview for the third.

    • @Daniel24724
      @Daniel24724 3 роки тому +25

      .. and that's why Jennifer is useless : the first movie never tought about his role. But as they made her going into the car, she must be in it at the beginning of part 2.

    • @mrbard1
      @mrbard1 3 роки тому +2

      Wow i didnt know that. Damn. We almost didnt have a trilogy of greatness.

    • @Avocado11
      @Avocado11 3 роки тому +4

      @@mrbard1 The only way any series back then got made was if they had a hit on their hands...or if they we super cheap.

    • @johnnythewalrus
      @johnnythewalrus 2 роки тому +2

      Only movie that ever had an official trailer for the sequel as part of the movie

    • @Believer1980
      @Believer1980 2 роки тому +1

      @@Avocado11 And, Imo , how it should be.

  • @Xenotric
    @Xenotric 3 роки тому +256

    Christopher Lloyd is just a joy to watch in anything he's in. Also I really love that you can basically watch the entire back to the future trilogy back to back as one long movie

    • @vytallicaq.6881
      @vytallicaq.6881 3 роки тому +7

      Loved him as Jim Ignatowski on TAXI.

    • @andydorman2119
      @andydorman2119 3 роки тому +5

      We DO watch it as one long movie! SO fun!

    • @UltimateTrekkie1
      @UltimateTrekkie1 3 роки тому +2

      I adore Christopher Lloyd; he’s quite literally my favorite actor. He’s so prolific and has some of the greatest facial expressions I’ve ever seen. He’s amazing! I’ve heard he’s actually pretty shy in person.

    • @TheFalconerNZ
      @TheFalconerNZ 2 роки тому

      @@vytallicaq.6881 Yeah he was great, the whole grew were but l like Jim most part was because he ........

    • @jeanine6328
      @jeanine6328 2 роки тому

      A lil treat for you. He guest starred in an episode of a show called Psych in the early 2000’s. It’s a crazy episode spoofing the movie Clue. Also includes a few actors from the original movie Clue. The episode is called 100 Clues if you’re interested in watching it.

  • @michaeljacyna1973
    @michaeljacyna1973 3 роки тому +322

    When I was a kid, I was terrified at the angry father who now lives in Marty's house. But as an adult, I see he reacted the exact correct way to a stranger in his daughter's room

    • @RonJomero
      @RonJomero 3 роки тому +66

      If anything, he let Marty talk way too much before beating without question.

    • @martyklestadt6766
      @martyklestadt6766 3 роки тому +51

      I actually found that scene quite humorous. "Damn right, you in the wrong house!" :)

    • @stormysummer162
      @stormysummer162 2 роки тому

      Why the hell do you think he reacted the right way? Damn you‘re so violent

    • @sebastianemond5313
      @sebastianemond5313 3 місяці тому +2

      "Wait, look, I just made a mistake!"
      "DAMN RIGHT, YOU *MADE A MISTAKE!* "

  • @Mr_M_
    @Mr_M_ 3 роки тому +282

    Robert Zemeckis himself has said they were never trying to predict what 2015 would actually be like and he knew they'd get a lot of stuff wrong anyway so why not just have fun with some of the crazy concepts? Surprisingly though, the 2015 stuff got a lot of stuff right too that people often don't give the movie credit for.

    • @dr.burtgummerfan439
      @dr.burtgummerfan439 3 роки тому +83

      2015 would have been like that, but that massive explosion at Cyberdyne Systems back in 1991 screwed up the timeline.

    • @amunago080
      @amunago080 3 роки тому +6

      @@dr.burtgummerfan439 lol nice one

    • @oliviawilliams6204
      @oliviawilliams6204 3 роки тому +7

      They got Star Wars 7 right

    • @Starbug1S1
      @Starbug1S1 3 роки тому +15

      If the Cubs just won on the correct year.

    • @martyklestadt6766
      @martyklestadt6766 3 роки тому +16

      @@Starbug1S1 I saw someone's theory, that in the "original" timeline, there was no baseball strike in 1994, so everything in baseball after that in our timeline would be one year earlier in the "original" timeline.
      So in our timeline, the Cubs won in 2016 instead of 2015.

  • @BlackMatt2k
    @BlackMatt2k 3 роки тому +67

    Not 2 years, it came out 4 years after the first. For a child, this was an eternity.

    • @caseyboyd2860
      @caseyboyd2860 3 роки тому +4

      I remember seeing part two in the theater as a kid and then trying to build a hover board. 😂

    • @0lyge0
      @0lyge0 2 роки тому +3

      Yes, it was a LONG 4 years. Not sure if she misspoke or had bad info but it was most certainly not 2 years.

    • @TomVCunningham
      @TomVCunningham Рік тому

      Robert Zemeckis directed Roger Rabbit in between. That's what took so long.

  • @SPVFilmsLtd
    @SPVFilmsLtd 3 роки тому +78

    BACK TO THE FUTURE never intended to have sequels. The ending was basically a joke and they thought it'd be hilarious if Jennifer got thrown into the time machine with Marty and Doc. It was one final, over-the-top, hilarious gag to end their comedy sci-fi flick on.
    When the studio and Spielberg approached Zemeckis and the writers to go ahead and make a second film, they freaked because they realized that Jennifer has no story purpose in the sequel and now they were stuck with her. Reportedly they did write drafts where Jennifer became essentially part of a heroic trio with Doc and Marty, but it never worked and nobody was happy with the dynamic.
    It's for this reason that Jennifer spends the entire film's runtime basically unconscious because they had to get rid of her without complicating their own story and it was the only solution they could come up with.

    • @rxtsec1
      @rxtsec1 2 роки тому +3

      Exactly, the original woman was supposed to come back but I think she had a scheduling conflict which is why they cast Elizabeth shue, they never wanted to go to the future also. That was just a joke which is why they didn't spend to much time in it.

    • @brettbull3676
      @brettbull3676 2 роки тому +7

      @@rxtsec1 Actually, the Jennifer from the first movie, her mom got cancer and it got real bad. So she couldn’t do the movies and stayed at home for her mom

    • @rxtsec1
      @rxtsec1 2 роки тому +2

      @@brettbull3676 yeah I've heard that also. for her that would be a scheduling conflict but yeah her mom getting sick was the reason

  • @joeo4496
    @joeo4496 3 роки тому +84

    At the end, the lighting bolt that hit Doc while he was flying caused the car to spin on its axis. Thats why the fire-trails look like a 99 in the air instead of a straight-line

    • @ShinyTogeticFTW
      @ShinyTogeticFTW 3 роки тому +10

      Also, it's not a 99, it's backwards; more like a rounded PP. It is odd that everyone (including me) immediately reads it as a 99 though.

    • @Cheepchipsable
      @Cheepchipsable 2 роки тому

      That was keeping me awake at night that was, thanks!

  • @The_RedVIII
    @The_RedVIII 3 роки тому +78

    This is actually my favorite of the movies because of all the different timelines and because we get to experience the first movie from a different viewpoint, which is just a cool idea in general.
    Regarding Jennifer not having to be there, yes - but the first movie ended with her traveling with them to the future, and back when they made the first movie, the ending was just a fun gag, they did not expect to make a sequel. Now that they made a sequel, they needed to figure out a way to write around the fact that Jennifer traveled with them. So they put her to sleep for most of the movie lol.

    • @Sarah_Gravydog316
      @Sarah_Gravydog316 Місяць тому

      people complain that Part 2 doesn't have an ending,
      so it's a bad movie,
      which makes NO sense??

  • @iannoelcamilotes1003
    @iannoelcamilotes1003 2 роки тому +7

    Fun thing. The Cubs won the World Series in 2016, so Back to the Future was about 1 year early on that prediction.

  • @3DJapan
    @3DJapan 3 роки тому +24

    4:28 This is why the idea for flying cars is to have a virtual highway in the air. A. you can only fly along that path, B. the driver really has no control, you tell the car where to go and it just follows the highway until you land.

    • @tc-tm1my
      @tc-tm1my Рік тому

      if they were controlled by advanced AI, it would work but still trouble if they fell

  • @dnllrnt
    @dnllrnt 3 роки тому +37

    I love the look on Doc's face when Marty asks if he and Jennifer turn out to be assholes in the future. Like he has to stop and go, "Wait, do they?" 🤣

    • @ShinyTogeticFTW
      @ShinyTogeticFTW 3 роки тому +8

      I always thought it was more of a "well, kind of, but I can't tell them that"

  • @bakedAK85
    @bakedAK85 3 роки тому +13

    Cool cameos in BTTF2: Elijah Wood was the kid in the hat in the diner by the arcade machine; Needles is played by Flea, bassist for The Red Hot Chilli Peppers; Match, one of Biff's gang, was played by Billy Zane

    • @bumblebee4me4ever
      @bumblebee4me4ever 3 роки тому +3

      Also, Billy Zane is Cal in Titanic, and the “save the clock tower!” lady from the first movie is the same woman that is laying with her husband on the bed as water rushes in also in Titanic!

  • @AdamasOldblade
    @AdamasOldblade 2 роки тому +5

    What's hilarious about it though is that the actor who plays Biff (Thomas Wilson) is the dead opposite of his character in real life. Everyone on set of all three films said he was the nicest most polite guy and then when he had to be Biff he just "became" this character.
    When a villain makes you actually HATE them, that actor did their job perfectly.

  • @greymatters6555
    @greymatters6555 3 роки тому +40

    When Marty is showing the young kids how the Duck Hunt video game works, look closely at the kids. One of them is a very young Elijah Woods!

    • @mattyoung7415
      @mattyoung7415 3 роки тому +7

      *Wood

    • @dustman820
      @dustman820 3 роки тому +4

      Wild Gunman was the game, but the same as Duck Hunt in that you need the Zapper to play it.

    • @MrWhatdafuBOOM
      @MrWhatdafuBOOM 3 роки тому +1

      Wood, not Woods.

    • @greymatters6555
      @greymatters6555 3 роки тому +2

      @@MrWhatdafuBOOM Yeah, him. They guy from Lords of the Ring. ;)

    • @mattyoung7415
      @mattyoung7415 3 роки тому +1

      @@greymatters6555 👏

  • @zammmerjammer
    @zammmerjammer 2 роки тому +13

    7:10 -- the stunt woman in that sequence ended up really hurting herself badly due to a poorly planned out stunt that was changed at the last moment and was too risky. That *used* to be the most interesting story about her life. Until a couple of years ago when she died in a bizarre ambush she had set up with her current husband for her ex-husband (this was in the U.S.A., so of course they all had guns).
    Life is weird, man.

  • @TheJulianga
    @TheJulianga Рік тому +4

    There is a theory that in 14:38 Marty actually died, and that's why the doc arrived in time to save Marty from the fall. Theres no way the doc would have known where to be at, if marty didn't jump first.

  • @MovieVigilante
    @MovieVigilante 3 роки тому +27

    Canadian actor Matt Frewer as Max Headroom (who was huge in the 80s) was the inspiration for the glitchy Ronald Reagan.

  • @MacGuffinExMachina
    @MacGuffinExMachina 3 роки тому +26

    They get the 80's nostalgia right, the multitasking, and flatscreen TV's right. A lot of people miss the TV thing, I guess because they're so ubiquitous now. Thwy weren't around then.

    • @gregstephens
      @gregstephens 3 роки тому +5

      Yeah- Just because we don't usually have six programs on a single screen, doesn't mean we don't have multiple screens of different sizes all at the same time!

    • @MacGuffinExMachina
      @MacGuffinExMachina 3 роки тому +1

      @@gregstephens I always have multiple tabs open. You see gamers with multiple monitors.
      Technically, flying cars can be made, but it would be impractical. Also, a helicopter serves the same purpose.

    • @michaelwinkle4480
      @michaelwinkle4480 2 роки тому +3

      This comment reminded me of something my father said back in the 1960s. He was the least imaginative man on earth and had no interest in science fiction, but he told me someday TVs would be an inch thick -- maybe less -- and people would hang them on walls like they would oil paintings. This was when TVs had picture tubes the size of bushel baskets.

  • @phdonnell
    @phdonnell 3 роки тому +18

    As others have stated, the "99" left behind by the DeLorean in the sky is actually the fire-trail from the time jump. It's actually a spiral, as the lightning strike forced the car to spin on its axis while it travelled back in time.

    • @Skrubb_Lord
      @Skrubb_Lord 3 роки тому +1

      Scanned comments to see if anyone was going to mention this.

  • @Texy88
    @Texy88 3 роки тому +3

    The tunnel in this film is the same one that had the entrance to Toontown within it in _Who Framed Roger Rabbit._

  • @TexasTransplant79
    @TexasTransplant79 2 роки тому +7

    Fun fact. This movie only missed the Cubs World Series Title by 1 year. The Chicago Cubs won the World Series in 2016, ending a drought of over 100 years for the team.

  • @namelessjedi2242
    @namelessjedi2242 3 роки тому +38

    You’ve really never seen mirror shades before?
    Yes, Doc could see through his visor! 😎

  • @SebastianBeckerPhoto
    @SebastianBeckerPhoto 2 роки тому +15

    The screaming in 2015 is actually explained by doc in s sidecomment to Marty. He says something along the lines of "their cyber enhancements are melting their brain" also explains Griffs weird headpiece.

  • @jm20105
    @jm20105 2 роки тому +3

    back to the future day was glorious, all 3 movies in a row with extra material in between.

  • @merchillio
    @merchillio 3 роки тому +10

    The three movies are so intertwined, it’s a delight to treat him and notice new details.
    Great reaction, as always

  • @ReasonableRam
    @ReasonableRam 3 роки тому +7

    The 99 in the sky is just the trail of the tires of the Delorean when it engages the flux capacitor, like when it leaves the fiery tire tracks on the road. It's just happenstance that it happens to be in a 99 looking pattern.

    • @Skrubb_Lord
      @Skrubb_Lord 3 роки тому +1

      Scanned comments to see if anyone was going to mention this.

    • @cooltube2000
      @cooltube2000 2 роки тому

      This is due to the rotational motion of the car.

  • @Edd25164605
    @Edd25164605 3 роки тому +4

    So many temporal anomalies, paradoxes in this.....but then you remember it's just a movie and let it go!

  • @Xoferif
    @Xoferif 3 роки тому +22

    Claudia Wells was unavailable for the sequels due to tragic personal circumstances, that's why she was replaced by Elisabeth Shue and why Jennifer doesn't get involved in the story much.

    • @adnap
      @adnap 3 роки тому +3

      I can’t help but wonder if then knowing the circumstances of how little they would use her in the storyline, maybe she could have accepted the role and been in the film anyway.
      I also wonder if they used Elizabeth Shue so little, due to the fact that it would be so obvious that a different actress was used.

    • @dr.burtgummerfan439
      @dr.burtgummerfan439 3 роки тому +4

      @@adnap She had completely stopped acting to care for her mother.

    • @thedisneybroentertainment5547
      @thedisneybroentertainment5547 2 роки тому +2

      @@adnap Claudia Wells stated the part was actually suppose to be huge in the sequel. She would have been a main character alongside Michael J. Fox, but after her mother got cancer and she quit acting in 1986, she turned down the 1989 sequel to Back to the Future and the third film.

  • @danh6076
    @danh6076 2 роки тому +3

    19:53 THAT'S BILLY ZANE!!

  • @TheDaringPastry1313
    @TheDaringPastry1313 2 роки тому +1

    The woman that hit the pillar at 7:09 was supposed to go inside with the two other guys and fall on a soft mat for the stunt, but she ended up going down outside of the building onto the hard floor breaking many bones. She got $13K for workers comp, but she also got an undisclosed amount from the studio. Pause it at 7:11 and use "" to go frame-by-frame. You can see her falling down outside. She actually brought up concerns with the stunt many times before it actually happened.

  • @CaddyJim
    @CaddyJim 3 роки тому +13

    This future is basically *80's* with a Sci-Fi twist, try to imagine *30yrs* in the future from now in the *2050's*

  • @RraMakutsi
    @RraMakutsi 3 роки тому +3

    Fun fact... Writer Bob Gale has confirmed in interviews that alternate timeline Biff was based directly upon a certain former US President, lol

  • @ryansullivan4298
    @ryansullivan4298 3 роки тому +4

    You should check out Max Headroom, the Cafe 80's scene will make a little more sense. Max Headroom was big in the 80's.

  • @gorydetails709
    @gorydetails709 2 роки тому +2

    The first “business man” on the video call was Flea, from Red Hot Chilli Peppers.
    He, and Anthony Keidis, have been in a few movies.

  • @Thoralmir
    @Thoralmir Рік тому +1

    Context with the 80s Cafe version of Ronald Regan: his appearance and glitching are a shout-out to Max Headroom.

  • @thomasherzog2172
    @thomasherzog2172 9 місяців тому +4

    My theory is that we are still living in this alternative Timeline and Biff Tannen was President from 2017 to 2021

    • @alfje5492
      @alfje5492 5 місяців тому +2

      I hear there are plans for a sequel... unfortunately...

  • @henrik971
    @henrik971 2 роки тому +2

    I really like that they use the Sports Almanac as a McGuffin in this movie XD

  • @Billinois78
    @Billinois78 3 роки тому +32

    They were almost right about at least one thing on 2015: the Chicago Cubs broke their 108 year World Series Championship drought, but in 2016.
    Michael J. Fox tweeted "Only off by one year. Not Bad. Congratulations @Cubs #FlyTheW"
    Also, they correctly predicted Miami would have a MLB team by 2015. The team started in 1993 but was the Florida Marlins until changing to the Miami Marlins in 2012.

    • @Billinois78
      @Billinois78 3 роки тому +1

      @AB The true King of Rock and Roll.

    • @MrWhatdafuBOOM
      @MrWhatdafuBOOM 3 роки тому +1

      'but in 2016'
      _So they weren't right._

    • @Billinois78
      @Billinois78 3 роки тому +1

      @@MrWhatdafuBOOM I'm sure you knew what I meant.

    • @MrWhatdafuBOOM
      @MrWhatdafuBOOM 3 роки тому +1

      @@Billinois78 Yeah, I mean that's why I answered.

    • @ShinyTogeticFTW
      @ShinyTogeticFTW 3 роки тому +1

      @@MrWhatdafuBOOM they may not have predicted it 100% accurately, but they had the right idea.

  • @superfark5914
    @superfark5914 2 роки тому

    I had a pair of those sunglasses at begining. You can see through them

  • @kriscynical
    @kriscynical 2 роки тому +2

    Somebody probably already answered this but 1985B DOES have a Marty and Doc. Doc shows 1985A Marty the headline in the library saying he was committed to an asylum, and Biff mentions Marty supposedly being at boarding school.

  • @ch44227
    @ch44227 2 роки тому +4

    They actually had no intention of making a sequel. They just thought it would be a fun way to end the first. It was so popular that they had to make a sequel, but they realized they wrote themselves into a corner. Likely they did a great job. This one is my favorite.

  • @maxmaven99
    @maxmaven99 3 роки тому +1

    Those stainless steel sunglasses were real back it the 80s. I had a pair. It was some sort of mirrored plastic, but you could definitely see through them.

  • @jagger2001
    @jagger2001 3 роки тому +6

    BTTF is my favorite trilogy of all time so I love that you guys are watching and enjoying them (for the most part) I can't wait for y'all to watch Part III to see how everything gets wrapped up!

    • @johnnythewalrus
      @johnnythewalrus 2 роки тому +1

      Dude! It's my favorite trilogy too! I've got so much BTTF stuff. A replica of the flux capacitor, Mary's multicolored hat from 2, and the photo of his siblings from 1 (among other things)

  • @lightyagami1752
    @lightyagami1752 3 роки тому +55

    The third movie is my favourite of the trilogy. Feels a lot more "authentic" than the second. Very much worth watching.

    • @johnnythewalrus
      @johnnythewalrus 2 роки тому +7

      I love them all but 3 is very underrated. I know a lot of people who don't like it, and I'm like "are you daft?"

    • @diha2271
      @diha2271 2 роки тому +1

      Guys it's 3 part's of one movie. Watching them in one go on Sunday with coffee and cookies is the only way how....

    • @Ian-Omega
      @Ian-Omega 2 роки тому +1

      @@johnnythewalrus It's very underrated, I think maybe it's the Old West setting that puts people off. I think it's great

    • @Cheepchipsable
      @Cheepchipsable 2 роки тому

      They made a lot more stupid decisions I though, which kind of made the film less enjoyable. Plus it was basically the same structure, so no real surprises.

    • @BertonMelch
      @BertonMelch 2 роки тому

      I still love the second movie

  • @peterschmidt4348
    @peterschmidt4348 3 роки тому +10

    Please watch WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT!

    • @mt2188
      @mt2188 3 роки тому +5

      They have its on their Patreon so it will be on UA-cam soon

  • @dennismoore3383
    @dennismoore3383 3 роки тому +8

    This came out over 4 years after the original. I know by what ex wife I was with. LOL. Just (sorta) kidding. Remember that part II and III were originally one movie, but the script grew to large and they split it. Part III was released about 6 months later. But unlike the original Back To The Future, which stands alone, you need III to fully wrap up what happens in II. Thanks for the reaction.

  • @whattha_huh
    @whattha_huh 2 роки тому

    Yes, you can see through those glasses. Universal Studios used to sell them and I had a pair.

  • @QuincySapien
    @QuincySapien 3 роки тому +1

    Our local cinema actually did a bttf triple Feature on october 21st 2015 to celebrate the date. They even got a delorean as a Foto OP. Was a great fun to See the movies on that special date :)

  • @chuckhackett4493
    @chuckhackett4493 3 роки тому +2

    At 16:47 would that be a para " docs" LOL

  • @brittroberds5500
    @brittroberds5500 11 місяців тому

    This movie is an incredible example of attention to detail in script and story writing. And the re-filming of some of those scenes from different perspectives is so so good.

  • @pacmon5285
    @pacmon5285 Місяць тому +1

    5:50 The glitchiness is based off an old fictional character Max Headroom that was used on MTV.

  • @freemanwithoutthephd639
    @freemanwithoutthephd639 2 роки тому +2

    please watch part 3!!

  • @Smokie_666
    @Smokie_666 3 роки тому +8

    First off, always love your reactions and perspectives to movies! Sometimes thought provoking and other times just plain funny. Keep'em coming!
    Second, this movie series is a classic for so many reasons. The hidden gems along the way of the changes in the timeline, such as Twin Pines mall becoming Lone Pine Mall after Marty ran over the pine tree in the past, or that Biff is having trouble getting out of the DeLorean when he returns from the past because he changed the past which meant he was fading like Marty was in the first movie (although more about it was in a deleted scene), really reward a person for paying attention but doesn't distract from the movie itself. And although all the actors help this story come to life, I always enjoy Thomas F. Wilson who plays Biff because he's a super funny and nice guy in real life, but he plays a real s.o.b. in these movies so good.
    Edit: Doc helping himself with the weather equipment wouldn't stop what was already in motion most likely since in the original timeline/story it came unplugged due to Doc adding tension on the line when he was trying to plug it back it at the clock tower.... but glad to see you both are thinking forward.

    • @radicaladz
      @radicaladz 3 роки тому +2

      Indeed - it's also implied somewhere in outside material that in the Dark Timeline, Lorraine eventually murders Biff for what he did to her and her family.

    • @ZaddyZavid
      @ZaddyZavid 2 роки тому

      Biff and western union guy are both "freaks and geeks" vips/veterans.

  • @alanhilton3611
    @alanhilton3611 3 роки тому +3

    The weird thing on the TV that Marty was looking at that weirded you both out was based on something called Max Headroom in the 90s.

    • @wwoods66
      @wwoods66 3 роки тому

      Late '80s. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Headroom_(TV_series)

  • @AceofKnaves1966
    @AceofKnaves1966 3 роки тому +3

    Can’t wait to see y’all’s reaction to the third movie, keep you the good work!

  • @GrouchyMarx
    @GrouchyMarx 3 роки тому +1

    George, I assure you that in 1985 and 1989 we knew there would NOT be flying cars by 2015 or 2021! LOL! I guess you know about the flying car at part 1 being more a joke at the end. @ 4:28 What you said there George is the same argument I made with a friends decades ago about flying cars. Except I said the word "dimension" rather than "axis" but is means the same. LOL! Of course back then or at least the 90s somebody made a fan driven flying car that was dangerous as hell, and this friend said we see these everywhere in a couple of years. NOT!! LOL! Most will never be ready to deal with the 3rd dimension called "up" on their own. 😁 You guys are going to really enjoy Part III. I hope you know about Clint Eastwood and his first Spaghetti Western in 1964 that made him very famous, as it will help a lot in part III. You saw a glimpse of it when Biff was in the hot tub with the two women. ✌😎

  • @snooks5607
    @snooks5607 3 роки тому

    28:08 no 19th century scientist ancestor seen sadly. Doc's family, von Brauns, were in Germany until 1908

  • @eugenereilly4410
    @eugenereilly4410 2 роки тому

    The glitchy Reagan was a send-up of a "futuristic" (for the mid-80s) television character called Max Headroom.

  • @jamiewilson9280
    @jamiewilson9280 3 роки тому +1

    There was about 4 years between the release of back to the future part 1 and back to the future part 2!

    • @rb93077039
      @rb93077039 3 роки тому +1

      Back To The Future was released in 1985, and Part 2 was released in 1989. That's 4 years, not 15.

  • @stevenlowe3026
    @stevenlowe3026 2 роки тому

    Here it is 2022 and I STILL don't have a hoverboard! BTW there are very strong parallels in this movie with "It's a Wonderful Life" with James Stewart - a 1940's movie well worth reacting to.

  • @jeremyryan770
    @jeremyryan770 3 роки тому

    I had those sunglasses back in the day, you can see pretty good through them.

  • @johnnythewalrus
    @johnnythewalrus 2 роки тому

    These have always been my favorite movies. I've got a replica of the flux capacitor, and the photo of Marty and siblings where they start to disappear from the first movie. And know pages and pages of trivia about all 3 movies. Oh and Marty's multicolored hat from 2. And a ton of BTTF shirts, and other paraphernalia

  • @rencloudkicker
    @rencloudkicker 2 роки тому

    So much detail went into the events that they even mention that the Almanac has a protective dust cover when the lady first sells it to Marty. It isn't until much later that we see how that detail comes up again. Great writing, a lot of seed planting throughout and excellent payoffs.

  • @Gershwinnvideos
    @Gershwinnvideos 3 роки тому +3

    Fun fact for Back to the Future Part 2 they reshot the entire ending scene from the first film with Elisabeth Shue in Back to the Future Part 2 because she replaced Claudia Wells as Jennifer Parker, because Claudia Wells had to leave to take care of her mother

  • @terryv2006
    @terryv2006 3 роки тому +12

    I’m sure it’s been asked, just wonder why George doesn’t appear on the thumbnails for videos. Love your reactions guys. Fellow Canadian here. Keep it up.

    • @godmagnus
      @godmagnus 3 роки тому +10

      George isn't as pretty.

  • @lordofchaosinc.261
    @lordofchaosinc.261 2 роки тому +1

    As a kid I never figured out, Jennifer was a different actress, lol.

  • @abrecordsdjschool
    @abrecordsdjschool 3 роки тому +8

    Here is a mind bending idea for you. Marty most likely died a few times in this movie.
    Death #1 Marty didn't know where to go in Biff's mansion and ended up on the roof. How would the Doc know to save Marty from the roof unless Marty jumped or was shot off the roof at least once.
    Death #2 How would the Doc know to drop the banner from the sky at that exact moment when he can't see what is going on in the tunnel with Biff chasing Marty. He must have run Marty over at least once before Doc knew exactly when to drop the banner.
    I am open to a friendly debate on the idea but it seems like a likely scenario to me.

    • @jewel79
      @jewel79 3 роки тому +1

      about the banner: nah, just a tention thing for the viewers... if Doc had dropped it sooner we wouldn't have stood on our seats the way we did while watching Marty escape from Biff .. don't make everything more complicated than as it is :-D

    • @abrecordsdjschool
      @abrecordsdjschool 3 роки тому +4

      @@jewel79 My stance came from other peoples reviews that I agree with. Don't be so pompous and simple minded. I said I was open to a friendly debate. Your last sentence wasn't very friendly.

    • @caseyboyd2860
      @caseyboyd2860 3 роки тому +3

      @@abrecordsdjschool I have actually agreed with that theory for a long time. I mean, the timing of Doc showing up at the perfect moment in BOTH instances makes sense that he may have witnessed the original outcome. However, "Violá," he has the time machine at his disposal to go back 10, 15, 20, etc, etc, minutes to be there at the precise moment he needs to be to save Marty.

    • @martyklestadt6766
      @martyklestadt6766 3 роки тому +2

      I agree with jeweljin about the banner.
      As far as the roof, my guess would be that Doc and Marty had planned that out in advance. Two reasons I believe this:
      One, Biff asked Marty how he'd gotten past the security downstairs. The answer is Doc had also dropped him off on the roof when they arrived.
      Second reason is that when Marty gets (back) to the roof, he looks and doesn't see Doc yet. The plan was for Doc to come back and pick him up from the roof, but they didn't quite sync that up. Doc fortunately then showed up just in time.

    • @abrecordsdjschool
      @abrecordsdjschool 3 роки тому

      @@martyklestadt6766 There is no way they had planned on jumping off the roof onto the hood of a car unless they had done this a few time. Did you ever see "Edge Of Tomorrow" . He has to die a few times before they get the plan just right. Doc could have dropped him on the roof to avoid security because he may have got caught trying to get past them a few times before. I am saying their plan my have had to have been worked out with some unfortunate trial and error. Doc could easily use Mr.Fusion to repeatedly come back to re-plan.
      Movie tension does not explain the banner near the tunnel when you are talking about movie theory. I'll say it again...Doc can not see what is happening in the tunnel. Logic would say that Doc would just go to the other end of the tunnel to get Marty. But instead Doc picks him up just in time with the banner by the entrance way. I say it must have been re-planned several times, or at least once. The whole storyline of part II is about going back to fix past mistakes.

  • @DC_Prox
    @DC_Prox 3 роки тому

    I had a pair of flexible reflective wraparound shades like that when I was a kid, and yes you actually can see through them. Maybe the prop they used in this movie was opaque, but in the 80s there were legit "sunglasses" that basically looked like Doc's headgear.

  • @iannoelcamilotes1003
    @iannoelcamilotes1003 2 роки тому

    Also, one thing, one of the first movies that showed the trailer of the sequel at the end of the movie.

  • @ArgonTheAware
    @ArgonTheAware 3 роки тому +1

    There were three Deloreans on that day in 1955, the one in the cave that Doc left there from 1885, the one that Marty took to escape the Lybans in 1985 and the one that Doc and Marty brought back from the alternate 1985

    • @Taj_Rahine
      @Taj_Rahine 3 роки тому

      Don't forget that one Biff used to get there too...so 4 Deloreans!

    • @ArgonTheAware
      @ArgonTheAware 3 роки тому +1

      @@Taj_Rahine I did forget that there was some overlap for a short period that old Biff was there, I never knew why he brought it back to 2015, since if he had not then it would have made his changes permanent and Doc would have no chance to correct it

    • @Taj_Rahine
      @Taj_Rahine 3 роки тому

      @@ArgonTheAware Good point, Doc would have had to build another time machine from scratch, or somehow find the Delorean if it wasn't destroyed in the new timeline. Maybe Biff thought he would be able to live the rest of his life out as a rich man in 2015 and that everything would be ok if they had no idea the time machine was ever gone.

    • @ArgonTheAware
      @ArgonTheAware 3 роки тому +1

      @@Taj_Rahine But that was the only reason that the timeline didn't change around Doc and Marty in 2015 like the newspaper and the matches because Biff brought the Delorean back to the same timeline while it still had to potential to be fixed, since old Biff gave the almanac to his younger self, it was never going to be him that benefited because he was from a different timeline and that version of old Biff would be erased

  • @rev.chuckshingledecker
    @rev.chuckshingledecker 3 роки тому +1

    I had mirrored sunglasses just like Doc (later the pro-wrestler and Canadian National treasure Bret “the hitman” Hart had them too) and yes you can see through them.

  • @DFWTexan42
    @DFWTexan42 3 роки тому

    The video reference you missed in the Cafe 80s was Max Headroom. Once you see an episode of that, you'll understand the style of the video characters.

  • @unfinishedsenten
    @unfinishedsenten Рік тому

    "Since when did you become the physical type?" is one of my all time favorite quotes. The delivery and facial expression(s) are so perfect!

  • @Alfredo-xf3ml
    @Alfredo-xf3ml 3 роки тому

    The shot in the tunnel with Biffs car lights is a tribute to the most famous scene on Steven Spielberg first movie "duel"

  • @JayDavis-O2brutal
    @JayDavis-O2brutal 3 роки тому +3

    The fact that I instantly understood George's shirt makes me question my life choices.

  • @lesliedaubert1411
    @lesliedaubert1411 2 роки тому

    The man that Marty speaks to about the world series is the actor who did the voices of Roger Rabbit and Benny the cab in " Who framed Roger Rabbit. There's a short cameo of a stuffed animal in the shop that Marty gets the sports almanac.

  • @theronleague7692
    @theronleague7692 2 роки тому

    The glitchy Reagan in the '80s cafe is a take off on a popular character on TV called Max Hedroom.

  • @nohhknowwyeww
    @nohhknowwyeww 2 роки тому

    16:40 Him getting handed stuff and talking shoppe does not preclude the stuff going wrong later in the Time-Line.-Ernie Moore Jr.
    There can be any build-up to a significant time Event. The significant time Event must occur for the Earlier Present to remain similarly the same.-Ernie Moore Jr.

  • @GRIZZLYSGEAR
    @GRIZZLYSGEAR 3 роки тому +1

    Can we get an ETA on the BTTF 3? You guys were great as per usual, can't wait for the next instalment...

  • @brom00
    @brom00 3 роки тому +7

    I may role my eyes at George now and then during the reactions, but kudos for his Hitchhiker's Guide t-shirt today. Would love to have that one.

  • @MrGox
    @MrGox 3 роки тому

    Ayy we back! was waiting on part 2! lets go!

  • @RealRonSwanson
    @RealRonSwanson Рік тому

    The use of "to be continued" at the end of the first movie presents this like a serial from the '40s & '50s that could only be seen in a theater.

  • @elfflame
    @elfflame 2 роки тому

    The Glitchy Regan and Iyatolah are based on Max Hedroom, which I highly recommend checking out. Very much an 80s relic.

  • @MrWhatdafuBOOM
    @MrWhatdafuBOOM 3 роки тому +1

    1. Doc meeting himself in 1955 and handing him the correct tool didn't alter anything, since it was the tree falling onto the cable that caused the problem at the climax of the first movie.
    2. When the Delorean got struck by lighting and vanished, that wasn't a 99 (would be a mirrored 99), it's just a swirl to indicate something goofed up, instead of the usual straight fire trails.

  • @davidmarsden192
    @davidmarsden192 2 роки тому

    Ronald Regan (in the Cafe 80s) was modeled after a fictional character from the early 90s called "Max Headroom" - which was a computer generated image (Matt Frewer) which was glitchy like in BTTF 2.

  • @RealRonSwanson
    @RealRonSwanson Рік тому

    In the Cafe '80s, the automated waiter is "glitchy" because it is mimicking an early '80s show called Max Headroom. Also, the competing digital characters were Ronald Reagan (also referenced in the first movie as being president in 1985) and the Ayatollah Khomeini, Iranian political and religious leader from 1985 who was considered a rival of Reagan and the U.S.

  • @jgmediting7770
    @jgmediting7770 3 роки тому +3

    Griff was like that because the doc explained his bionic implants went wrong, or something.

    • @Taj_Rahine
      @Taj_Rahine 3 роки тому +1

      People always miss that line.

  • @sasamichan
    @sasamichan 3 роки тому +2

    this is my fav of all the part 2 movies. Sequels can be good or bad it goes both ways too many examples to name every one
    October 2015 was a huge deal. Lots of Malls etc had Back to the future pop displays and cosplay shows.
    the glitchy computers is a reference to Max Head Room a sci-fi character who appeared in a few things.

  • @TheNowhereMan0
    @TheNowhereMan0 2 роки тому +1

    Hey guys! I love your reactions! Here from Argentina 🇦🇷🙋🏻‍♂️

  • @trekkingchica
    @trekkingchica 3 роки тому

    I was just wondering when you were going to watch this! I’m a child of the 80’s so I’m loving that you two are watching these.

  • @nerdguru86
    @nerdguru86 Рік тому

    I know I'm late to the party 😂, but the way Doc explained time travel in this movie was amazing!!! One of my favorite scenes from a movie EVER!!!!

  • @jp3813
    @jp3813 3 роки тому +4

    The backwards "99" that the DeLorean leaves after getting struck by lightning is due to it spinning on its axis at 88 mph. Jennifer is mainly used to cover the subplot of Marty's automobile accident.

    • @jp3813
      @jp3813 3 роки тому +1

      @@justmeeagainn It's straight from the DVD, genius!

  • @MoonHowlerGaming
    @MoonHowlerGaming 2 роки тому

    You CineBinge movies etc and now I'm a fan binge watching your channel.

  • @sukidoshi
    @sukidoshi Рік тому

    I just watched this and when Simone talks about how Doc Brown talks to Doc Brown and she says "this is so messy and I don't like it" is so funny! I'm making a character for the Alternity TTRPG that can time travel and I'm going to use that line. LOL!

  • @pigs18
    @pigs18 2 роки тому +1

    The TV part was actually accurate. My cable company had a channel that showed six different news channels (including the Weather Channel) and you could switch between the audio for each one. (They had a similar one for sports as well.)

  • @happyslapsgiving5421
    @happyslapsgiving5421 3 роки тому +19

    "The fixed timeline has no Doc and no Marty."
    That's a non issue.
    Think about the original trip.
    For a whole minute, that timeline had no Einstein.
    Until he came back a minute later.
    No big deal.
    Think about Marty in the first movie.
    Sure, when he left and went to the past, that timeline had no Marty... but he actually came back ten minutes earlier, so in the end for ten minutes that timeline had two Martys, then went back to one.
    Bottom line... it doesn't really matter if anybody leaves their own timeline, as long as they come back.
    And if they don't... it's just one more unsolved missing person case.

    • @Lightmane
      @Lightmane 3 роки тому +3

      So that's what happened to all these "missing persons". Now we know 😀😎🙂

    • @David-qi1ys
      @David-qi1ys 3 роки тому

      @@Lightmane Not all of them. There's Cecilia Dasenberg who the authorities still don't know what happened to her on August 17, 2005, but I can assure you she didn't time travel. [DON'T ASK!]

    • @Lightmane
      @Lightmane 3 роки тому +3

      @@David-qi1ys my comment was sarcasm

    • @Daniel73-23
      @Daniel73-23 3 роки тому

      @@David-qi1ys Then again, there's Johann Heisenberg, who the authorities still don't know what happened to him on January 29, 3005, but I can assure you he did time travel. {DON"T ASK ABOUT THAT EITHER - IT"S STILL CLASSIFIED}

    • @jowbloe3673
      @jowbloe3673 3 роки тому +2

      @@Rocket1377 - Thought you meant George McFly and I was confused.

  • @MadcapMatt
    @MadcapMatt 3 роки тому

    I don't know if anybody said it but he was setting up the wire the pole hit on the street. Not the one that carried the lighting down from the clock tower.