Nice. Twice I've had rejected landings at JFK. First one was hairy with feet left over the tarmac coming in hot on 13L. Second was less dramatic and higher up due to traffic on RWY.
These four rollers sound great; power and consistency. Rollers (Rolls Royce) give and continue giving. Combined with the Boeing, an enduring partnership.
You know these guys in the Subway hearing loud music on there headphones ? I am sitting in the Subway and hear this engine Sounds from B777 B474 A380.... :DDD
At my airline we just sit tight until either the Captain makes an announcement OR the flight deck call the cabin service manager to make an announcement on their behalf.
On their 2nd attempt, they decsended and found what was later identified as the 1930s World Fair; on their next attempt, they saw dinosaurs roaming the lands that will become New York City.
Rejected landing I reckon. RTO at high speed is usually only for serious things but aborting a landing can be down to anything as little as the positioning's a bit off.
With a takeoff, if you're at low speed then yes you might reject for a little thing but at higher speed a lot of the time it's safer to take off and come back because of the risk of not stopping. Bear in mind a fair number of go arounds (aborted landings) are due to something on the runway, you wouldn't have takeoff clearance if you didn't. There's also the fact there's a lot more variables in the air (such as winds etc) than on the ground.
Every go around vid Ive seen, it seems that regardless of when the GA is initiated (i.e. close to touchdown, or in this case, still with some altitude) the power applied is at or close to 'max' (hence the wonderful engine sounds!). But it seems like in this case and others, 'max power' isn't needed in terms of 'necessity' ... so is it just standard practice as part of GA to always use high power? Im maybe not saying the question well. Said another way, less elegantly, on GA the crew always seems to 'floor it' even when doing so isn't necessary 'techincally' when they could just apply some small or moderate power and easily go around (im not criticizing in any manner - just curious if its a standard practice to 'floor it').
they're landing not far from stall speeds, so suddenly needing to climb requires max power to prevent stalling... think of it as a takeoff, but they began in the air
Aha - you've kindly put the proper perspective in my head and now this makes perfect sense, *THANKS @Drone* for helping end my ignorance on that question that had long perplexed me!
Every airliner has a TO/GA switch, a little button behind the thrust lever and if pressed it will automatically revv the engine to full power (takeoff/goaround =TOGA). Its used for some takeoffs when the plane is near max weight or in case of goarounds like this, to quickly apply full thrust. The main reason why they use full power is basically to get the hell out of the runway ASAP. On many airports you have a sequence of planes one right after another and TOGA thrust is needed to climb as high and far away from the immediate runway space as possible to avoid potential danger or delays. Missed approach instructions on most airports basically say "get the **** out of there asap"
The approach appears a little unstable to begin with, judging by the large changes in engine power. To hear 'buzzsaw' on approach is very rare, unless in very windy conditions I would think, and in the follow-up video of the second approach there is a ~constant power setting. Of course it would be difficult for a pilot to explain that they executed a go-around because the approach wasn't 'stabilised'. But by all means I may be entirely wrong and there will probably be more to it than we can see. Just how it appears in this video.
robbieshaft cause aircraft if is within the 5-7 mile approach and the plane is not configured for landing or there is another aircraft still taking off on the runway the other aircraft that is coming to the airport will tell the tower in this case it will be something like this Boston tower this is speedbird heavy 4miles going around speedbird is the call for british airways even a vehicle in the runway will cause it to go around
Adrian Cook that too Adrian planes when they are in approach if it mistaken they need a separation of 10 miles due to wake turbulence and that depends the airport and the aircraft that you are going behind with
![Flying the British Airways 747 from London to Washington DC [VATSIM - PMDG 747 - Prepar3D v5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9Na58g_Gp-U/mqdefault.jpg)
That throttle up! All that power lifting the queen back up 😍
That engine roar tho
Lot of power were used in the approach! RARE!
Music to my ears!
Nice picture you got there
I always enjoy the sound of the engine pitch increase in power of a 747 or various other Jets.
The RR's look so small when compared to the GE's.
Sir Christopher and yet still powerfull
Sir Christopher they burn less fuel and oil compared to CF6'S
Sir Christopher but sound so great!
And lighter too.
Smallest engine on the 747 yet the most powerful one.
Ah! Rolls Royce, the best sound in the world!
The roar while landing is cool
the classic RB211 sound.
I just love the engine growl!
Can i sleep to the RR sound please? I feel so relaxed whenever I hear them...can someone explain why?
Nice. Twice I've had rejected landings at JFK. First one was hairy with feet left over the tarmac coming in hot on 13L. Second was less dramatic and higher up due to traffic on RWY.
Amazing video. Great angine. Liked and subscribed.
These four rollers sound great; power and consistency. Rollers (Rolls Royce) give and continue giving. Combined with the Boeing, an enduring partnership.
Gives me goosebumps
Engine sound!! wow! i like video!
0:25 that Immense Roar
You know these guys in the Subway hearing loud music on there headphones ? I am sitting in the Subway and hear this engine Sounds from B777 B474 A380.... :DDD
747 forever!
Nice 👍 subscribed
Sounds like a 7,500 rpm V8!
nice video .... which camera you used
Strange the CC didn't make a standard 'go around PA'.
What does IKR mean?
Philip Mahoney there to busy with go around procedures
When I was airline cabin crew, we stayed in our crew seats and the cabin manager made the go around PA.
At my airline we just sit tight until either the Captain makes an announcement OR the flight deck call the cabin service manager to make an announcement on their behalf.
Hello, for what stands PA, CC and IKR if you please tell us. I thank you in advance.
Probably due to a plane on runway and not the weather....all looks quite routine to me.
I had one of these landing in Boston. As one who doesn't like flying to begin with, this was NOT FUN!!!!!!!!!!
stevedrums it's one of the best experiences you will ever have.
What registration of this B744 Jumbo Aircraft？
Rb211 roar ❤️
RB 211 OLD SKOOL buzz saw!!!
Rolls royce beauty sound
Have you landed yet?
No. To this day he is in the sky.
Yes, off course
On their 2nd attempt, they decsended and found what was later identified as the 1930s World Fair; on their next attempt, they saw dinosaurs roaming the lands that will become New York City.
No they’re still in the air rn
Looks like he way to fast on the ils .... decided a second approach on numbers?
Some people have all the fun!
Terrifying for passengers..
Full of character
Rolls Royce
Airbus got in the way.
Rolls Royce at their best
You ppl are always trying to politicize everything! Now you use a clickbait title on an aviation video? Shameless.
Im not sure if this is a joke, but where is the click bait?
Another day another drama
Wowwwwwww
Ohhh man
so what's the problem?
rejected take off vs rejected landing witch is more com man ?
Rejected landing I reckon. RTO at high speed is usually only for serious things but aborting a landing can be down to anything as little as the positioning's a bit off.
that serious for landing ? why not same for take of ?
With a takeoff, if you're at low speed then yes you might reject for a little thing but at higher speed a lot of the time it's safer to take off and come back because of the risk of not stopping. Bear in mind a fair number of go arounds (aborted landings) are due to something on the runway, you wouldn't have takeoff clearance if you didn't. There's also the fact there's a lot more variables in the air (such as winds etc) than on the ground.
i see i have seem some vidoes online where they reject the take off below or at v1
Every go around vid Ive seen, it seems that regardless of when the GA is initiated (i.e. close to touchdown, or in this case, still with some altitude) the power applied is at or close to 'max' (hence the wonderful engine sounds!). But it seems like in this case and others, 'max power' isn't needed in terms of 'necessity' ... so is it just standard practice as part of GA to always use high power? Im maybe not saying the question well. Said another way, less elegantly, on GA the crew always seems to 'floor it' even when doing so isn't necessary 'techincally' when they could just apply some small or moderate power and easily go around (im not criticizing in any manner - just curious if its a standard practice to 'floor it').
they're landing not far from stall speeds, so suddenly needing to climb requires max power to prevent stalling... think of it as a takeoff, but they began in the air
Aha - you've kindly put the proper perspective in my head and now this makes perfect sense, *THANKS @Drone* for helping end my ignorance on that question that had long perplexed me!
Every airliner has a TO/GA switch, a little button behind the thrust lever and if pressed it will automatically revv the engine to full power (takeoff/goaround =TOGA). Its used for some takeoffs when the plane is near max weight or in case of goarounds like this, to quickly apply full thrust. The main reason why they use full power is basically to get the hell out of the runway ASAP. On many airports you have a sequence of planes one right after another and TOGA thrust is needed to climb as high and far away from the immediate runway space as possible to avoid potential danger or delays. Missed approach instructions on most airports basically say "get the **** out of there asap"
I would like to know the seat number? :D
18f
God's engines
Clickbait, there was no aborted landing in that video.
Why did it abort the landing?
The approach appears a little unstable to begin with, judging by the large changes in engine power. To hear 'buzzsaw' on approach is very rare, unless in very windy conditions I would think, and in the follow-up video of the second approach there is a ~constant power setting. Of course it would be difficult for a pilot to explain that they executed a go-around because the approach wasn't 'stabilised'. But by all means I may be entirely wrong and there will probably be more to it than we can see. Just how it appears in this video.
the captain said it was because there was a Delta plane that was way too close in front of us and therefore we had to do a go around.
robbieshaft cause aircraft if is within the 5-7 mile approach and the plane is not configured for landing or there is another aircraft still taking off on the runway the other aircraft that is coming to the airport will tell the tower in this case it will be something like this Boston tower this is speedbird heavy 4miles going around speedbird is the call for british airways even a vehicle in the runway will cause it to go around
Adrian Cook that too Adrian planes when they are in approach if it mistaken they need a separation of 10 miles due to wake turbulence and that depends the airport and the aircraft that you are going behind with
If I remember correctly, it is 3 mile separation in the terminal airspace. 10 mile in-trial separation while enroute.