Army Combat Vet REACTS to 20,000 Soldiers vs 2 Million Zombies!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2022
- ➧Get Exclusive Content on / combatvetpaul
Original Video is Here: • CAN 20.000 WW2 ARMY ST...
➧My UA-cam Creator's Master Class is 90% off! Just $12.99 tinyurl.com/UA-cam-Referrals
CAN 20.000 WW2 ARMY STOP 2 MILLION ZOMBIES - Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator 2
My Recommended Reading (affiliates)
➧Putin's War Against Ukraine amzn.to/3xK8kd9
➧Guns of August amzn.to/3n30Ugh
➧Sapiens amzn.to/3npxidf
➧Discord! discord.gg/ZmhCTJmAhW
➧Merch! tinyurl.com/5d8aywze
➧MHGR! / militaryhistorygearreview
➧Instagram: combatvetpaul
➧Combat Veteran Breakdown Podcast: / @combatveteranbreakdow...
For business inquiries only: cvr.mhgr@intheblackmedia.com
*Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. No copyright infringement intended. ALL RIGHTS BELONG TO THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS
*Disclaimers: all opinions are my own, sponsors are acknowledged. Not financial advice, for entertainment purposes only.
*As an Amazon Affiliate, I receive commissions for sales through links at no additional cost to the buyer - Ігри
By the end of the video you can see those bodies stacked into hills. UBS2 is pretty good at that sort of simulation. The game also has an RTS mode for a human player to command the forces at their disposal. So in theory you could set this exact scenario up in game and play it with full control of the forces. Might be something interesting for the streams?
You greatly overestimate the abilities of Paul's PC if you think he can run a simulation game
The big problem with maintaining that rate of fire (other than ammo) is that wouldn't the gun barrels all start to overheat and potentially warp? I would think those machine guns on the tanks especially shouldn't be able to maintain that rate of fire unless the guy swapping the barrels is amazingly fast and on point.
You should totally play this game and give demonstrations on certain formations, layouts, and the best possible tactics for said formations.
love the breakdowns on logistics of games combat systems and how weapons would actually work. great job as always MHGR
To me the tank looks like the Sherman easy 8. It can have 1 hull 30 cal mg, 1 turret 30 cal mg, and a gun over the commanders hatch that was typically a 50 cal... and of course the 76mm main gun.
These are M4A2 (76w) Shermans.
The M4A3 HVSS or M4A3E8 had a much more different suspension than the M4, M4A1 and M4A2.
The M4A3 also had thicker and slightly wider tracks to fit the new HVSS Suspension.
The main gun wasn’t 76mm, if you look at other Shermans, they used 75mm guns, though given many Shermans were being made by various other manufacturers instead of one and each made their own modifications but still weren’t enough that the entire tanks were unique to each that you could still use parts interchangeably, given they were with somewhat different yet overall similar shapes in the main body, there was also a difference in production methods as well for these different models, but moving on, the main gun would be 75mm, but given later in the war, the need to have better penetration against tigers and other heavily armored tanks, the 76mm would be used, the same size that the British used for their Sherman Firefly, which uses a 17 pound cannon which is the equivalent to a 76mm, given they are the same size pretty much.
Edit; to note, it wouldn’t be every Sherman firing a 76mm gun, it would be some with 76mm guns while the rest are firing 75mm guns to overall provide fire against infantry as well, that is what the British had to do, given their 17 pounder guns couldn’t fire HE shells, they needed the Shermans equipped with the 75mm guns which were able to fire such shells there to supplement their forces, it wouldn’t do to have your tanks equipped to better handle other tanks be taken out by infantry when you supplement such things by having other tanks who could better fill an anti-infantry/infantry support role while also having infantry itself to work with these tank companies.
To note, you could tell a bit, which Sherman is which, like the M4A1s had a cast made main body that was curved and smooth while some other models would be weld made and had a more angular body, moving on, maximum effective firing range for the best penetration for a Sherman would be 500 meters if it is using the 75mm cannon, while if it were the 76mm cannon, it could have the same penetration capacity, albeit a little bit better at 2 kilometers (2000 meters) on an armored plate angled at 30 degrees, but moving on, the penetration capabilities of it dropping, drops less drastically for the 76mm comparatively to the 75mm. Though if we had to compare the American’s 76mm to the British equivalent size gun which was their 17 pounder which is used in the Sherman firefly, then if the 75mm gun could penetrate 74mm of armor at a 30 degree angle at 500meters before there is a penetration drop off at further distances, then the the 76 would be about 98mm of armor at 500 meters while the 17pounder could do about 140mm of armor angled at 30 degrees at a range of 500 meters, though the penetration drop off at further distances drop more drastically where if the 76 was 98 at 500m, 90 at 1km, 84 at 1.5km and 76 at 2km, the drop off would be 8, 6, 4 mm; but go to the 17 pounder, that would be something like ~140 at 450m, ~130 at 910m, ~120 at 1.37km, and ~111 at 1.83km, the drop off being 10, 10, 9 mm for armor penetration at further distances. But to note, that given there are different versions of the 17 pounder just as there are different versions of the 75 and 76mm guns, means that those numbers aren’t going to be the same for every gun if they are designed and made differently.
Zombies flanking not because of tactics but because of path finding algorithm, it tries to place zombies in free places.
There's this youtuber called Nano that I believe you can react to because his style of videos at least to me show how difficult it really is to be an infantryman in a battlefield.
I wonder if you'd be able to look at the Valkyria Chronicles series, which is an alternate, bit more fantastical WWII setting. Look at the weapons, gear, vehicles, and all that. It would be neat to get a perspective on the series that you would be able to give.
The 3 rank row formation could work imo if the front rank is prone 2nd rank is kneeling and third rank is standing that way all 3 ranks can fire and see the enemy
He did say it in the video.
@@Flamme-Sanabi oh I must’ve missed it
3:21 that was a M4A3E8 sherman or the Easy 8 sherman my friend. it was an uparmor and an up gun sherman, this version actually can kill and pen the front armor of the famous panzerkampfwagen vi tiger, but it still have some difficulties to pen the front armor of the panzerkampfwagen v panther.
ultimate epic battle simulator 2, as far as i can tell is just a simulation of statistics how a unit with simple tactics like stand your ground or attack would fare. it not only does completly ignore ammo and other factors that limit the fire rate and basically assumes perfect conditions and that the unit will be capable of instant performing the next attack as the previous is done, besides that its also just simpöle stats of damage, health and armor. so a zombie even if the enemy is made out of metal which irl would be immune to the attacks a zombie can do in this game if the attack stat is higher then the defence stat it will do the amount of damage remaining after substracting armor from the damage value. the game isnt bad but its more of looks and showing of statistics rather then actually being realistic.
Let’s be honest in most zombie apocalypses the zombies would realistically get slaughtered by the military only the bullshit zombies that have like super powers could win
Plot armor powers
Or zombies from cod or dying light
Zombies already have super powers.
Self moving corpse, do you know how far you have to remove them from reality to get that?
Build a zombie using GURPS and see all of those required secondary powers for what they are.
28 days later and WWZ Zeds are probably the closest thing to real "Zombies" we could actually see.
@@firewarrior5828 only they probably wouldn’t last long meaning before deteriorating as all the stress they put on their bodies would realistically shred break them down and tear them apart.
You added subtitles? I love you Paul!
I believe the tanks are M4A2(76)W Shermans though I may be wrong on the exact model (they could also be M4A1 or M4A3 Shermans). But from what I can tell they are most likely M4A2s equipped with long-barrel 76 mm anti-tank guns, judging from the turret shape and hull shape at least. If someone else can more accurately describe that than me that would be great.
Edit: Quickly adding more detail myself: the 76 mm Shermans were used to supplement short barrelled 75 mm Shermans and did not function as the main battle tank of the US until after WW2, with the M4A3(76)W HVSS (later renamed the M4A3E8) seeing much more widespread use in the Korean War. To have this tank deployed and call it WW2 is technically accurate since these tanks did see widespread (albeit not universal) use during the period, but really a much larger number of regular M4A1, A2, and A3 with short 75 mil guns should be depicted. But that is a minor gripe from a pedant.
Again, if anything I said is wrong, please correct me.
It wouldn’t be the M4A1 given that was cast made while it could be a weld made for these Shermans shown that Paul is watching.
@@VoidedEmptiness Yeah I figured that out afterwards by comparing the hulls. It's definitely an M4A2 as the M4A3 has a sort of bulge around either side of the tracks to accommodate its HVSS.
very interesting, very good video hope to see more!
Stationary defensive position is one of a small amount of pet peeves for the outcomes of those simulation battles. Almost all military tactics has at least 5 plans (for just retreating) to this style of armor&infantry in one branch. It is fun to see though. I love your videos thanks for teaching me more things as well 🤔🧐
That Sodaz Stalker Fan film is good i hear!
there's so much zombie blood holy hell its a sea of red, oh the zombanity
its the M4A2 76mm Sherman
I am pretty sure all deaths are saved. So if you see a zombie die at the start it's body should still be there by the end... It is hard to tell with the messy aftermath but I haven't found any vanishing yet.
No I don't know about y'all but I think a tank with like four people inside of it and just some Spears and pistols would probably be a doable thing versus an actual hoard of zombies considering you know zombies don't normally carry guns or anti-tank explosives
honestly the biggest problem would be fuel at that point
@@alexanderzachary1001 I mean if you're a military trying to hold zombies off if you park a few tanks at a chokehold and just continually make noise you're not really using much gas afterwards.
I was just talking about like from an assault standpoint if you were trying to defend an area
@@jonathanevans3853 Problem is you'll have to move out of the corpse hill at some point.
I don’t know the exact model off the top of my head but from the suspension it looks like the volute springs are vertical so it’s most likely an M4 M4A1 or M4A2. There might be some variation of an A3 that has vertical volute springs but usually from the M4A3 and onwards they had their volute springs horizontally.
Alright so after some quick looking it might be an M4A2 76W. It seems the most like it.
I know it is like hella old but it would be cool to see possibly a tactical breakdown of the division’s factions or something
Tank appears to be a M4A2 76 Sherman, missing many of the defining features that would make it a different model such as the rounded front sides of the M4A1 or the slightly extended… don’t know the exact term but ima go with side skirts of the M4A3.
I'd get this game and make simulations this big but my laptop would probably catch fire
2 Days late but in the actual WWZ book (Not the movie or the games, i dont care what you think the book fucking out does any of the other), humanity specifically America would go back to using Civil War era fireing lines which became extremely effective when dealing with the Zombies or Zekes.
You should really play this game. I feel like your expertise in tactics would make this as realistic as possible and entertaining.
Hi Paul, i don't know if you ever read 'World War Z' by Max Brooks or listened to the audio book but there is a whole section of how the military dealed with the zombies. First how they failed since they didn't understand the new threat and then how they eventually succeeded. The original book is structured like a report or documentary of the whole 'World War Z' from beginning to 'end' and across all of societey with eye witness reports from poor and rich, civilian and military, politician and businessperson, from Canada via France to Russia. Explaining what kind of problem which country or social structure or beliefe system had to face, at least trying to stay logical and practical. It is worlds ahead of the movie or even the games which were spectacular in their own way. I really highly recommend it.
I am just waiting for him to go "Fine, I'll do it myself."
RIP the queen, she died an few hours ago
I think you'd enjoy some of the Men of War ai scenarios
Yo subtitles. Pog
Well, from one of the best descriptions of mechanized infantry versus zombie horde - world war Z, the book. HE and Sabot rounds not work. Cluster munitions not work. Air-fuel bombs does not work. Training that is intended on destroying humans (aim at the center of body) does not work on enemy that can be ripped to pieces and still moves, until the actual brain is destroyed.
Did flechette tank rounds exist in ww2?
Ultimate Epic Battle Simulator is fun to mess with if you have a beefy PC.
The tanks look like M4A3E8 with 76mm main armament typical of US forces towards the end of the war. Alot of 75mm tanks did persist into the war pretty late though, and those might have been better because the 75 had a more effective high explosive round. This is a small side effect of the higher velocity of the 76, more stresses on the shell means more material in the shell walls means smaller filler for explosive. Tanks in defensive positions can engage a mob target like this pretty far out, especially if the tankers have created range cards and assigned sectors of fire for each platoon.
The tanks are M4A3 (76) W Shermans
i would start with a v formation that collapses into a circle
Try to react to C&C Generals Zero Hour | RISE OF THE REDS | Freedom in 30 FPS (by UberDanger)
In case anyone wanted to know who this is doing the simulation it’s daily tactics.
He do be looking goofy within the thumbnail.
I feel like you would enjoy Men of War: Assault Squad 2 that's a really cool Battle simulator also Diplexheated is a good channel for battle simulators in general.
Interesting
Can you react to a men of war video called the most insane superfortress ever by diplex heated but only by his permission first 👌
OOooo subtitles
#idea
Could you do a reaction to the Saber tooth by plastic apocalypse
(Stop motion plastic army men film BTW)!!!
Try to react to C&C Generals Zero Hour | RISE OF THE REDS Freedom in 30 FPS (by UberDanger)
The sea of red
Day 40 of asking Paul to react to Tanya the Isekai demon
A
Ay, I was first
B
D
The thought behind the Vs simulation type of video is very small. They don’t really put much thought behind formation or unit type. They don’t think strategically mostly the thought process is putting a lot of characters together on screen. You’d actually be lucky to find videos with commentary when it comes to this because of how easy these videos are to make. Plus the ai of a lot of these simulation games are very very simple. I don’t get the appeal as mostly the videos are the same throughout and this applies for a lot of battle simulation games. Besides tabs.
Can you please react to #BumblesMcfumbles which tf2 character committed the most war crimes
That is why I can't really enjoy such game - AI usually too simple.
Try to react to C&C Generals Zero Hour | RISE OF THE REDS | Freedom in 30 FPS (by UberDanger)
Try to react to C&C Generals Zero Hour RISE OF THE REDS Freedom in 30 FPS (by UberDanger)