How RTK works | Real-Time Kinematic for Precise GNSS Positioning

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @benni2294
    @benni2294 2 роки тому +16

    Beautiful animation, keep it up!

  • @lp08hopefully
    @lp08hopefully 2 роки тому +9

    Best explanation on YT, thanks.

  • @m0rz-sc3gd
    @m0rz-sc3gd 2 місяці тому

    My rtk setup currently is not emlid brand, but I inherited it. Perhaps the next one will be. Cool video!!

  • @skydeploy
    @skydeploy 2 роки тому +4

    Much better, more detailed video!

  • @luisramos2521
    @luisramos2521 2 роки тому +1

    Tremendo nice excellent!!! Way to go.

  • @gunningopher
    @gunningopher 7 місяців тому +1

    Pretty good simplification of the current state of RTK. I've been using RTK for almost 30 years, have built and operated an RTK network, train people on how to use it and help develop standards for its use with a major state DOT.
    Your distance error statement was not correct in my opinion, at least for this level of discussion. In my opinion, you should simply have described the distant dependent error. Saying it is good or not at a range depends on the precision/accuracy needed, and that varies. RTK is entirely appropriate at 50im, for certain applications (single or multi-band) Single band RTK isn't just limited to 10km, It has more to do with the integer ambiguity (described) and often having to fix over a known point. Multiband RTK has near instantaneous 'fix' and can better correct for ionospheric error, which does impact the distance dependent error, but not by much for RTK.
    This is a good quick description overall, and one that I would use if I were to put it in context.

  • @LaylasEncyclopedia
    @LaylasEncyclopedia 2 роки тому +2

    Great explanation!

  • @knoblda
    @knoblda 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you so much, this helped a lot!

  • @Golfing-Carpenter
    @Golfing-Carpenter Місяць тому

    Why are you using a Base and a rover for RTK?
    In Sweden we only use a GNSS Rover with RTK connection via ex Trimble TDC600.
    Or a 360-active prisma with totalstation integrated.

  • @cnmuader
    @cnmuader Місяць тому

    非常好视频,使我卫星旋转🥰

  • @BassAnywhere
    @BassAnywhere Рік тому +1

    Hi, what is the accuracy difference using only one Emlid SR2+ as a rover with RTK via NTRIP (with wifi cellphone) vs one SR2+ as a rover and another one as a base like in the video ?

  • @khaledhafiz
    @khaledhafiz Рік тому

    Very professional. Thanks

  • @evaldaszmitra7322
    @evaldaszmitra7322 10 місяців тому

    S22 supports carrier phase if I am not mistaking. RTCM messages can be received from any free nearby station.
    Is there nothing preventing my phone from achieving

  • @cjleongson
    @cjleongson Рік тому

    Can you like have an rtk drone to aid the rover and base when its hard to find signal because of say vegetation?

    • @Emlid
      @Emlid  Рік тому

      Hi! It is possible, but if there is dense vegetation, it may be difficult to obtain an accurate drone map too. Photogrammetric software needs contrasting points in photos to tie them together. Trees don't work as points of contrast.

    • @cjleongson
      @cjleongson Рік тому

      @@Emlid i hope that "weakness" or downside of rtk could be addressed. Gotta go for total station where there is vegetation blocking the signal

  • @fatima546
    @fatima546 2 роки тому +1

    Well explained

  • @IanB1015
    @IanB1015 2 роки тому

    With RTK do you need a rover? Or would a Drone with an RTK module count as the rover in this case?

    • @Emlid
      @Emlid  2 роки тому

      Hi there! RTK drone can act as a rover.
      For example, you can learn how to work with Reach RS2 base and DJI Phantom 4 RTK rover in our docs: docs.emlid.com/reachrs2/tutorials/integration/p4p-rtk/#perform-flight.

  • @alhdlakhfdqw
    @alhdlakhfdqw 2 роки тому +1

    really incredible videos thank you very much! subbed :)

  • @droneoccitanie
    @droneoccitanie 2 роки тому +1

    Great.
    Is it possible to achieve millimetric precision ?

    • @NithinJune
      @NithinJune 2 роки тому +1

      Lmao you’re so greedy I love it

    • @smiauu
      @smiauu 2 роки тому

      nope. rtk cant reach mm precision but it is possible on relative positioning

  • @bhupendrakumar3834
    @bhupendrakumar3834 Рік тому

    is it necessary that satellite is same for rover and receiver?

    • @ademdingin
      @ademdingin Рік тому +1

      Usually in the rover and base will have same satellite if they have in same area (approximately within 30km radius)

    • @bhupendrakumar3834
      @bhupendrakumar3834 Рік тому

      @@ademdingin thanks. can we say same for the phone gps? that they will be connected to the same satellite in 30km radius?

  • @blain5827
    @blain5827 Рік тому

    How is the known control point determined?

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 Рік тому +2

      Base position is known by conventional surveying, or gps averaging. And your rover accuracy relative to the base is good, but the absolute accuracy is only as good as your base position accuracy.

  • @Panchobway
    @Panchobway Рік тому

    Where do I buy?

    • @Emlid
      @Emlid  Рік тому

      Hi there! You can place an order at our online store: store.emlid.com/ :) You can also check out the list of dealers in your country: emlid.com/dealers/

  • @NithinJune
    @NithinJune 2 роки тому +1

    _centimeter level accuracy_

  • @ashfaqahmed5165
    @ashfaqahmed5165 2 роки тому

    I learned the RTK survey Can anybody help me in pakistan ??

  • @bunnysai90
    @bunnysai90 2 роки тому

    But we need explanation about static......
    Please note NOT PPK.... We need static

    • @Emlid
      @Emlid  2 роки тому

      Hi there, thanks for your request! We'll consider your idea for future tutorials :)

  • @GddbHdhd-gb4wl
    @GddbHdhd-gb4wl 3 місяці тому

    Brown Kenneth Rodriguez Donna Garcia Jessica

  • @doormanfoc
    @doormanfoc Рік тому

    All the license "professional" surveyors that I hired and personally witnessed stake out a worksite using just the carry around one... I would always double checking their work measuring physicals tools it has always been off by a whole six inches to a foot no matter who I hired. Now watching this video and knowing that none of them use proper equipment to give us accurate information I am fuming at how much money was wasted paying those lazy cheap frauds. Should/can I sue them?

    • @adegokeayobami2208
      @adegokeayobami2208 Рік тому

      Is either the site has canopy or the instrument they brought is fault, next time tell them to do test of instrument before site operation

    • @MJ-it8ru
      @MJ-it8ru Рік тому

      Lol no they are using a remote base through the internet, they don't need to set up their own base station. It's called VRS and it's not going to be 6" off. In my experience 99% of the time some guy with a tape measure is saying that the surveyors are off, he is the one that is wrong.

    • @gunningopher
      @gunningopher 7 місяців тому

      I can assure that neither I or anyone that works for me would have done that, if it is true. Take your concerns to the registered professional who you should have contracted for the work. If you are not satisfied, take you claim to the state board of registration. If you just hired some hack that isn't licensed (as they are legally required to be in most states) then you get what you pay for.
      If you are in California, you have a lot of options. If you are in one of those "I hate regulation" states, then you might be screwed.

    • @doormanfoc
      @doormanfoc 7 місяців тому

      @@gunningopher Sadly all these surveyors were licensed, I am in Florida so it seems this is one area that needs better regulated. I think part of the problem is with some of these surveyors the actually licensed person is not actually doing any the work and is sending barely trained field workers out to do the bare minimum to cut cost.

    • @gunningopher
      @gunningopher 7 місяців тому

      @@doormanfoc take a complaint to the board of registration. It is common practice for the licensed practitioner to be in the office, but that in no way absolves him of responsible charge for the work that they contract.

  • @wuzhai2009
    @wuzhai2009 Рік тому +6

    Doesn't say much.. gloss over many details!

  • @pedrosmith4529
    @pedrosmith4529 12 днів тому

    I am sorry but that looks like a diaper.

  • @stargazer7644
    @stargazer7644 Рік тому +3

    How RTK works: math and handwaving. This explained nothing. How about explaining those complicated calculations at least a little bit?

  • @aprillakilak
    @aprillakilak 2 роки тому +1

    This is the only explanation I found that actually made sense to my non-surveyor soul 🥲thank you so so much

  • @elivan5541
    @elivan5541 Рік тому +1

    Beautiful animation, keep it up!