For any question or game test, Please drop a comment ⬇ Check Performance difference after Windows 11 KB5041587 update: ua-cam.com/video/-AodxYlT8R0/v-deo.html Ryzen 9950X BIOS Tuning and PBO on MSI board: ua-cam.com/video/R1rzDdoVyPg/v-deo.html MSI Memory Timing Preset BIOS Feature on Ryzen 9950X: ua-cam.com/video/hO9l7k_tAsQ/v-deo.html 7950X3D vs 9950X Wukong Gaming Benchmark: ua-cam.com/video/zW1azXsuaic/v-deo.html Ryzen 9000 BIOS Tuning Guide: ua-cam.com/video/R1rzDdoVyPg/v-deo.html Ryzen 7000 BIOS Tuning Guide: ua-cam.com/video/WpbXJriG3f4/v-deo.html Ryzen 5000 BIOS Tuning Guide: ua-cam.com/video/JgLh1PZyWbU/v-deo.html Ryzen Full playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLg8ANjUNzqfNErAU88kd06ZvUHOQPqWxQ.html If you enjoy my content, Please give it 👍, Subscribe, & Join the TECHOSAUR Community on Discord here : discord.gg/PXmJY6BP8b Become a Channel Member: ua-cam.com/channels/-jauq-kZ20FrlnCMkx2gSQ.htmljoin Pateron: www.patreon.com/TECHOSAUR
Hey Buddy so I did everything you said on a previous Video you came out with on curve optimizer and it was great. Then last night I did the Motherboard update and did the same thing on the curve optimizer video and My performance drop but the temperature is a lil better.
@@TECHOSAUR Yes and it did helped a lot. So before the Agesa update it was doing good after the Bios Update it dropped 2% performance. I was gonna ask you something because I just ordered the X870E and Im gonna do the same thing you explain but to the X870E on the Curve Optimizer. It should work right?
Thats huge I would like some content 1st 7800x3d vs 9950x fixed version 2nd 7950x3d before and after the update to see if it beniefet also from the new agiesa 3rd 7950x vs 9950x fixed to show the new performance differ
Yeah I have seen 1.2.0.2 has been out for a while for testing, surprised I can barely find anyone benchmarking it. Do you reckon this will also affect 9700x?
I believe it fixed core delay when cores from different CCDs are cross-communicating. So I think that applies for 9900X and 9950X I wish I had 8 cores model with one CCD to verify this
When you want to benchmark a CPU, it's always better to set low graphics settings in a game. This way, we can minimize the GPU bottlenecking. We want to see the FPS that could potentially be gained from the CPU, not the GPU, especially in 4K. If I raise the settings, there will probably be almost no gains because we are already being capped by the high resolution, and the GPU usage would be at 99% If you want to benchmark a CPU, you need to aim to lower GPU usage as much as possible so that it doesn't cap performance I learned this after watching big youtube channels , i used to set max all and failed at showing cpu impact on performance To sum it, this update is a game changer IMHO, it even brought more notable differences than the Windows update fix we got 2 weeks ago, it's a no brainer to install this bios version for anyone using ryzen 9000
In a real-world scenario, everyone will likely use some upscaling. Still, if it's something you would like to see, I'll try next time ill test in extensive graphics settings: low, medium, high. Hope this one at least gave u a glimpse of it
The BIOS for my X670E-F, version 2401, dating back to September 13th, is still a Beta BIOS. I'm only waiting for the 'official' non-Beta version to be released to update. But I cannot wait to see the differences (I'm using a 7900X3D CPU). I'm also curious to see if using the new cTDP 105w option would provide an extra boost on top of the new AGESA update benefits (which is also something I would like to see being benchmarked, for supported CPUs of course; and I don't know if my 7900X3D is part of the list for the 105w option).
Yeah, just don't ask hardware unboxed to test it, because they will find SOME way to not show any improvement because they have an agenda to force AMD to lower prices, and they're completely incompetent at configuring things. It's either incompetence or malice, and every new review from other people showing improvements looks more and more like it's deliberate from HUB. PS. AMD chipset drivers also improve performance over the stock windows drivers.
honestly, online reviews are often very negative, and it seems like they're more interested in making fun of the product than providing constructive criticism. You can see through thumbnail, title, I understand that it's important to push companies to improve their products and lower their prices, but we also need to be fair and appreciate the progress they've made overtime. I don't judge a product solely based on its initial release. Of course before buying, it's important to keep an eye on how a product is developing, how it launched versus current state, It's also important to consider how the product's performance is improving over time. It often depresses me to see how negative online reviews can be which is why I read written articles, or take peak of various videos I hope to stay true on this channel, I feel happy to spread some positivity
Massive Gains ?, from moving from a AM4 5700G to a AM5 9700X this week I can tell that the only thing I see by default is massive wattage from the plug socket . by default on all auto the 9700X pull 184 Watts all core from the wall and 60 Watts idle with 1 ssd and the internal iGPU , it's easy to have massive gains with even more massive power draw ?.
@@jabronilifestyle I do agree with you on that point , but it's so easy to make your graphic card or CPU twice as fast as your previous one when it uses 3 times the power . To me saying the new Ultra AI 25 TX HX super extreme is 20% faster ,but used 50% power is not a real gain at all , I can remember the days of the Intel's Pentium 6 when they upped the clocks and power so high they could not cool it , which is why in the end they started to drop the clocks and increase the core count.
For any question or game test, Please drop a comment ⬇
Check Performance difference after Windows 11 KB5041587 update: ua-cam.com/video/-AodxYlT8R0/v-deo.html
Ryzen 9950X BIOS Tuning and PBO on MSI board: ua-cam.com/video/R1rzDdoVyPg/v-deo.html
MSI Memory Timing Preset BIOS Feature on Ryzen 9950X: ua-cam.com/video/hO9l7k_tAsQ/v-deo.html
7950X3D vs 9950X Wukong Gaming Benchmark: ua-cam.com/video/zW1azXsuaic/v-deo.html
Ryzen 9000 BIOS Tuning Guide: ua-cam.com/video/R1rzDdoVyPg/v-deo.html
Ryzen 7000 BIOS Tuning Guide: ua-cam.com/video/WpbXJriG3f4/v-deo.html
Ryzen 5000 BIOS Tuning Guide: ua-cam.com/video/JgLh1PZyWbU/v-deo.html
Ryzen Full playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLg8ANjUNzqfNErAU88kd06ZvUHOQPqWxQ.html
If you enjoy my content, Please give it 👍, Subscribe, & Join the TECHOSAUR Community on Discord here : discord.gg/PXmJY6BP8b
Become a Channel Member: ua-cam.com/channels/-jauq-kZ20FrlnCMkx2gSQ.htmljoin
Pateron: www.patreon.com/TECHOSAUR
Thanks for that :)
Could you also test with 9600x and 9700x???? The community wants to know if also benefits 9700x/9600x?
How about more games?
Very interesting data! Waiting for my 1202 bios update
Thanks 🫶
What's ur motherboard? Asus got it first and now MSI few days ago
@@TECHOSAUR I have a gigabyte b650 motherboard.
Exactly what I was looking for. Thank you for this, I'm gonna update now.
thanks for commenting bro, enjoy 🫶
I subscribed to this Channel cause I can see you know what you are doing!
Thanks, I'm honored, sorry for late reply 💚
Hey Buddy so I did everything you said on a previous Video you came out with on curve optimizer and it was great. Then last night I did the Motherboard update and did the same thing on the curve optimizer video and My performance drop but the temperature is a lil better.
Is your CPU a 9950X?
What motherboard is it, and what is the current BIOS update?
@@TECHOSAUR Yes and it did helped a lot. So before the Agesa update it was doing good after the Bios Update it dropped 2% performance. I was gonna ask you something because I just ordered the X870E and Im gonna do the same thing you explain but to the X870E on the Curve Optimizer. It should work right?
Thats huge
I would like some content
1st 7800x3d vs 9950x fixed version
2nd 7950x3d before and after the update to see if it beniefet also from the new agiesa
3rd 7950x vs 9950x fixed to show the new performance differ
Wait so to do all of this, I need four CPUs 😱
Will try to get them promise!
Yeah I have seen 1.2.0.2 has been out for a while for testing, surprised I can barely find anyone benchmarking it. Do you reckon this will also affect 9700x?
I believe it fixed core delay when cores from different CCDs are cross-communicating.
So I think that applies for 9900X and 9950X
I wish I had 8 cores model with one CCD to verify this
Thank you but why low settings ? People with this cpu will not play in low.
Do you planned to do the same in medium and or high settings ?
When you want to benchmark a CPU, it's always better to set low graphics settings in a game. This way, we can minimize the GPU bottlenecking. We want to see the FPS that could potentially be gained from the CPU, not the GPU, especially in 4K. If I raise the settings, there will probably be almost no gains because we are already being capped by the high resolution, and the GPU usage would be at 99%
If you want to benchmark a CPU, you need to aim to lower GPU usage as much as possible so that it doesn't cap performance
I learned this after watching big youtube channels , i used to set max all and failed at showing cpu impact on performance
To sum it, this update is a game changer IMHO, it even brought more notable differences than the Windows update fix we got 2 weeks ago, it's a no brainer to install this bios version for anyone using ryzen 9000
@@TECHOSAUR yes i know its true but its also pointless in real world use
In a real-world scenario, everyone will likely use some upscaling. Still, if it's something you would like to see, I'll try next time ill test in extensive graphics settings: low, medium, high.
Hope this one at least gave u a glimpse of it
@@TECHOSAUR thank you for considering my opinion :)
@@TECHOSAURIt make sense for me to use low setting. It shows improvement without GPU being limited. I think you are doing great job 👍
Does this help the 9 7950x3d???
This BIOS update mainly focuses on Ryzen 9000, but the previous Windows update KB5041587 included fixes for Ryzen 7000 as well
The BIOS for my X670E-F, version 2401, dating back to September 13th, is still a Beta BIOS.
I'm only waiting for the 'official' non-Beta version to be released to update. But I cannot wait to see the differences (I'm using a 7900X3D CPU). I'm also curious to see if using the new cTDP 105w option would provide an extra boost on top of the new AGESA update benefits (which is also something I would like to see being benchmarked, for supported CPUs of course; and I don't know if my 7900X3D is part of the list for the 105w option).
Yeah, just don't ask hardware unboxed to test it, because they will find SOME way to not show any improvement because they have an agenda to force AMD to lower prices, and they're completely incompetent at configuring things. It's either incompetence or malice, and every new review from other people showing improvements looks more and more like it's deliberate from HUB. PS. AMD chipset drivers also improve performance over the stock windows drivers.
honestly, online reviews are often very negative, and it seems like they're more interested in making fun of the product than providing constructive criticism. You can see through thumbnail, title, I understand that it's important to push companies to improve their products and lower their prices, but we also need to be fair and appreciate the progress they've made overtime. I don't judge a product solely based on its initial release. Of course before buying, it's important to keep an eye on how a product is developing, how it launched versus current state, It's also important to consider how the product's performance is improving over time. It often depresses me to see how negative online reviews can be which is why I read written articles, or take peak of various videos
I hope to stay true on this channel, I feel happy to spread some positivity
Massive Gains ?, from moving from a AM4 5700G to a AM5 9700X this week I can tell that the only thing I see by default is massive wattage from the plug socket .
by default on all auto the 9700X pull 184 Watts all core from the wall and 60 Watts idle with 1 ssd and the internal iGPU ,
it's easy to have massive gains with even more massive power draw ?.
everything has more power draw though, so don't single AMD out when Intel and Nvidia are doing the same thing.
@@jabronilifestyle I do agree with you on that point , but it's so easy to make your graphic card or CPU twice as fast as your previous one when it uses 3 times the power .
To me saying the new Ultra AI 25 TX HX super extreme is 20% faster ,but used 50% power is not a real gain at all , I can remember the days of the Intel's Pentium 6 when they upped the clocks and power so high they could not cool it , which is why in the end they started to drop the clocks and increase the core count.
And now run a debloated windows 11 or the last version of win 10 with those updates...where is standing steve when we need him?
Thats not true
What is not true?
do you have a discord?
Yesss
discord.gg/BHDDcrux