Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
The Fates Of The Playable Diablo 2 Characters - Diablo Lore
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 вер 2018
- Ever wondered what happened to our playable characters from Diablo 2? Today we're going to find out the fates of our Amazon, Assassin, Necromancer, Barbarian, Paladin, Sorceress, and Druid characters according to Diablo lore.
Cool Diablo 3 Short Stories!: us.diablo3.com/en/game/lore/s...
✊ Subscribe to support the channel: / iinexius
🐦 Follow me on Twitter for chats and updates: / iinexius
🎥 I sometimes stream on UA-cam or Twitch: / iinexius
If you enjoyed the video, please consider liking and leaving a comment. Interaction helps others find and enjoy my hard work as well as support the channel!
They died after not logging in for 14 days
Press F to pay respects to fallen mules
Got a laugh outta me. 😂
savage
I do not get the reference
+
gigaswardblade Diablo 2 multiplayer characters get deleted from the Battlenet servers if you do not log in after a certain amount of time.
Legend has it they’re still running cow levels to this day.
lololol
\
There is no cow lvl tho.
Shh.
They are, I see them there~
Legend has it the boil on Gheed's ass never fully healed to this day
Even if the male barbarian isn't the player from Diablo 2, he could have very well been one of the mercenaries you could hire in Harrogath. That would explain him seeing the worldstone as he whould still be there along with whoever the player was that hired him. I find it interesting, it'd be the first time a player character in a future game started as a mercenary from a previous game.
now THAT is much better explanation
I wast thinking the same
Also thinking the same, I like this explanation better.
True. There are some games where an important character was a mere extra in the previous title. For example, Viktor Reznov from COD series was a side character from Call of Duty World at War but in Black Ops, he was a very important character.
@@foofoo3344 What World at War did you play? Reznov was absolutely INTEGRAL to every single event in the Russian side of that game's campaign. Granted, his role had increased significance to the story of Black Ops 1, but he was still a very significant character in WaW.
compared to the d1 characters , these guys had quite a good life huh D:
They also were not dumb enough to smack the first demonic soulstone they came across right into their brains.
Well if you compare the Warrior to anyone its a rainbow sunshine life, he comes home to his land ravaged by demons, his farther was slain and brought back as an undead abomination, he has to slay him and previous friends and knights of his kingdom, then treck through hell seeing hes people ravaged just to find out his brother was used to summon Diablo (who he killed, killing his brother on top of his father). Then he slowly goes mad, has a child with the witch, and undoes all the good he did before being shed like a snake skin. The last of his line is use create the prime evil... The Leoric Family line is F@#$ED lol...
Also he Iron maned it, literally went down and didn't come back to town till Diablo was dead, so hes got a bit of the mental damage.
@@markus-hermannkoch1740 That was the Warrior, But the Rogue never smacked the soulstone into their brain, or did the Sorcerer... Those are the Bloodraven on D2 act 1 and the false Summoner on act 2
@@matheusbee3441 she did stab herself with the stone tho so did the mage
The paladin, having witnessed the atrocities of the zakarum church, renounced his ties to the zakarum and decided to form an inquisition with 2 other men dressed in red robes from a mysterious place called "Spain".
I hear nobody expected it
@@normcalkins349 the children didn't see it coming. especially the 10 year old boys.
The Paladin with all his Glowing armor and infinite Auras walked off into the sunlight
And he did so like a boss
Pretty sure he spammed teleport
@@daletorrisi4038 he spammed holy shield a couple of times and then left the game.
As long as I'm concerned, the Paladin finally found peace and light through beer and bitches.
Anyone who saves mankind deserves such a retirement, IMO.
I always imagined the paladin went mad or became a crusader after discovering Mephisto’s control of the Zakarum Church.
I think we learn by the Crusader talking with the ghosts in D3 act 5, that she is the only one remaining of the 100 hundre. Each of them would only train one apprentice, so 100 went in, and 1 came out, and a couple of generations had passed, so it can't be the paladin.
But i really like your idea of the paladin going mad from seeing the Zakarum fall. Maybe he just ended as some nobody in an insane asylum. Would be tragic.
In the crusader short story she defeats a couple insane Paladins - they’ve gone full religious zealot mode. I was thinking the D2 paladin might have ended up like them.
@@veermudambi5795 I doupt it he faced and killed Mephisto and at the very least helped scourge the corrupt church at the the side of other heroes. (If he didn't do it all himself) If any Paladin remained untainted by evil, it was him. I don't think he became a Crusader though as all of them had been trained up to be Crusaders from the start apart from the Paladins. I could see him going off to found a new order, or just retiring to a nice calm place to contemplate the light in peace, or more likely dying in battle with the forces of evil, likely remnants of the Zakarum, as he tried to help redeem his faith.
Defeats the prime evils....gets killed by an assassin. Good job.
Would make sense if that Assassin was the same one who helped her defeat the Prime Evils.
You can be the very best, like no one ever was (hehe), that doesnt make you immortal, one mistake or one good move from the adversary is all it takes to die in battle, there is also other things like traps, ambushes, assassination, fighting handicapped (like trying to protect something or someone while fighting), being injured or tired from something previous etc
I'm guessing getting 20 years older and being out of that type of fighting for so long could have made her skills go down a bit especially if you're caught guard by what I would imagine would be a top level assassin. She also didn't defeat the prime evils by herself either, all the other characters helped alot with taking them down.
So you think a masterclass mage can't be backstabbed or poisoned by a masterclass assassin? Do you not know how assassins work? It's not a duel, it's murder. Especially if the murderer has identical feats as the sorcerer... being as you said, defeating the prime evils.
I forget the source but apparently the sorceress didn't go down without a fight when they found her body. Since the sorceress draws upon magic to fight, it would make sense for the assasin to bring some sort of item to nullify her powers before taking her down. Her greatest strength became her greatest weakness in the end.
Natalya killing Isendra fits quite well with what we learn about her in D3. Reading the lore bits on the Natalya set pieces, it is revealed that Natalya had quit the Order because of something she couldn't live with and became a Demon Hunter seeking redemption.
The assassination of Isendra could've been the catalyst for that.
are you saying that the DH in D3 is the same assassin in D2?
@@And-ur6ol Obviously not. Natalia most probably joined the demon hunters much earlier than the D3 DH. The name of the d3 dh is likely Valla cause that's the name of the dh in heroes of the storm.
@@And-ur6ol or she founded the order of DH
@@icestick3
No the Demon Hunters are an old order.
I disagree with your Barbarian argument that world stone was seen only by playable Diablo 2 Barbarian. My mercenary in act 5 was a barbarian. So when Diablo 3 barbarian says "I saw the world stone", it's possible he is a Diablo 2 Mercenary.
I agree with you brother, but in the lore that DII Barbarian is called Renit. After his group defeated Diablo he and his group departed to his homeland where a Druid and an Assassin joined their team against Ba'al. The same group of heroes who defeated Diablo also defeated Ba'al and together along with the Druid and Assassin, saw the Worldstone collapse as Tyrael destroyed it in order to prevent Ba'al's influence. However, the destruction of the Worldstone made the new generation of humans powerful again (that is the new group of heroes in DIII) many years later after the events of Lords of Destruction, Renit somehow led an army at Daken-Shar where he lost a battle against Ba'als last surviving demons and somehow managed to meet Cairo (Cairo is playable in DIII and she is also called the Chosen) in the future. Renit and Xul somehow reunited in DIII and formed a new group of heroes against Diablo.
Very nice thought! It would also fit the age.
Renit also fought the three guardians (also known as Avatars by the people of Harrogath) of Mt. Arreat Talic, Madawc and Korlic during the LoD and it is the first time Renit is called the Nephalem by the trio. Once defeated, they became Renit's spectral guardians as he retain that ability to summon them in DIII.
Would be hilarious if so considering that the barbarian mercenaries were probably the worst and almost no one used them.
Ziegour you saying that xul is the d3 necro?
Pity, I was hoping to know the Paladins fate. He was the first character I chose to play as.
didn't natalya left the assassins and join the demon hunters?
In diablo 3 her crossbow description states : Natalya turned from the ways of the Viz-Jaq'taar and sought redemption in the weapons of the demon hunters.
depends on the timeline of events. maybe she killed the sorc and sought repentance later.
The assassin is NOT Natalya, she is an NPC in Kurast until you defeat Mephisto, then she is gone. You can literally play the assassin character and be in act 3 talking to Natalya.........
Yeah gameplay rarely ever directly equals canon. Things such as game mechanics are a good reason for that. Just because its in the game, doesnt make it canon. If it did, then does that mean every bug, glitch, and crash in the game is canon? And how do you account for the fact people have done thousands if not millions of different playthoughs of the game? Not every single one of those millions is canon.
I’m pretty sure the Assassin class had a shadow clone ability, so no reason she can’t talk to herself. Maybe the player character was actually a shadow clone of the real Natalya?
Also, the assassin’s set is named after Natalya.
Are we talking about Lore in a game that can't even get the identity of it's people correct. i.e. the Diablo 1 warrior was just that, a warrior who lived in tristram "Thank goodness you've returned, much has changed since you lived here" much? Then he becomes "The dark wanderer", then in Diablo 3 we are expected to believe he was king Leoric's son, Aidan like changing him to being Leorics son would even matter. Talk about a complete lore shift.
Echo's Let's Plays. I agree. Honostly, i feel that the only two that came from diablo1 to 2 was the rogue bloodraven and the dark wanderer. From d2 to d3, i dont think any of them made it. I think they all went to therapy and stayed there haha
No D2 Sorc of mine has been killed by assassins!
00:50 amazon
2:10 necromancer
3:33 barbarian
5:25 sorceress
6:54 the rest of em
@Killer Rune What shit about it ?!
@Killer Rune yes what is shit bout it?
I'd like to think that Isendra somehow faked her death and she has gone off on some secret adventure with the assassin, paladin and druid.
Alexander Paterson lol
Considering they mention the D3 character talking to her soul, no chance unfortunately
There is no Dana, only Xul!
Nice reference from GB1!
Are you the Keywarden? xD
Well what is he doing in my icebox?!?!?!!!!
Are you the key-master?
Gate-keeper?
In d2 they made all the heroes go insane from the horrors they witnessed in d1 or become possessed. In d3 they made all the heroes go on a vacation
Hey, thanks for the vid! Natalya was an NPC in Act 3 in D2 and had an item set named after her, so I don't think she was the playable assasin character. I read some lore that she was tasked to keep one of mages from being corrupted by the dark wanderer.
this. if natalya were the PC assassin then she couldnt be there as an NPC when actually playing as the assassin, but she was. so there is just no way that can be true.
also, i dont know about heroes of the storm characters, but does it explicitly say that the amazon, barbarian and necromancer in there are in fact the canon D2 characters? it would seem alot more logical if they were rather the canonical D3 characters of their respective type.
None of the named characters are the 'player' , the players characters names are what you give them during creation. The others are just part of the various groups. Cassia for example is part of the act 1 rogues.
@@erbgorre they even got the same voice actors from d2 =)
Yeah, I actually just reached Act 3 today playing as a trapsin.
Her dialogue (from what I remember). Was she called my char a hero and is impressed by my deeds, she wanted to join but had to stay just in case something bad happens.
tehkill3r -> Wha¿
Man the scores for D1-2 were the best.
From what I've heard, a big reason for the removal of the idea about the D3 Barbarian being the same person 20 years later, is that Cain's dialogue would not make sense anymore, since he would actually know the Barbarian personally. That said, I still don't know why they just wouldn't go through the extra effort of making additional dialogue just for the Barbarian.
"There is no Necromancer, only Xul".
What a lovely singing voice you must have.
I always thought they ended up like everyone else, running Baal hell.
Doing the obligatory warcries , and then proceed to teleport several miles away , chugging potions like an addict, cheesing the town portals haha!
i still remember the burning souls, mfs were traumatazing
@@solarwrath1313 Dolls aswell, your merc kills a couple while teleporting could be gg
i'm not sure that the characters appearing in HotS qualifies as making them canon
there are other possible barbarians that saw the world stone. but those are mercenaries. so one of them can be the one from d3 maybe
Very good point, far fetched but still, a good point.
@@MaTTer1235 i mean you could hire barbarians as your followers, so... i kept my rogue tho, couldn't be bothered to find new sets of gear.
It's a shame alot of our answers will come in Diablo immortal a game most of no us probably won't play.
Thornwolf i will probably download it illegally and play it offline
@@brucekentallen how when it's mobile only?
@@thornwolf4234 Android APKs
What answers?
The game is going free anyway.
It's just heavily "Microtransactioned" to the core lol
My take: Paladin after seeing travencal went to the east and joined the crusaders and our D3 male crusader is his apprentice. A male and female crusader was sent in D3.
Naw... It is said the Paladin still lives to this day in the pandemonium event, running circles around the uber monsters and holding the primes real versions at bay :D
I like the idea that the barb id the same one... I always wondered why his model had grey hair... and this ties that in nicely
that music in the background is so nostalgic
Just goes to show Blizzard has no fucking clue what they were doing, when making Diablo 3, their cannon being all over the place, and retconning, or just ruining good established lore.
RIP Diablo.
My thoughts exactly. Diablo 3 damaged so much of the pre-established lore and added nothing good. I have a hard time being excited about the future of Diablo's story.
reminds me of Konami when they retconned the idea of Sonia Belmont being the first belmont. "Females being a lead character? LUL!" fucking perfect lore lost.
Diablo 1 & 2 ~ Nothing else...
I, as a someone who gets the lore of Diablo and what Rathma stands for, cringed so hard at that "inspiring" cinematic at the end of Act IV in D3. To quote late Han, "that's not how this works!". If Angels really did sway the balance so hard, the Sanctuary would've been obliterated. But D3 / M.Bay Transformers era designers simply can't understand this. fml
we akll know they changed barbarians gender for fanservice.
thanx for making this, very interesting
Diablo 2 - Barbarian is the male Barbarian in Diablo 3
Diablo 3 - Female Barbarian is his apprentice
This was discussed by Blizzard
D2 he's young and fresh for battle. In D3 he's old which makes sense.
@lioheart2356 cause his skills were deminishing from all the sitting around lol
I have no idea
But during D3 when the barbarian rescues Deckard Cain in act 1, the dialogue indicates that they don't know each other
@@TMFriedVO Theres so many fuckups in the story of D3 that theres a good chance this is just another one
@@TMFriedVO
D2 and D3 Barbs are not the same. D3's Barb is a Nephalem, as is every player class there (D3 loves to elevate its characters above D2) and D2 Barb 90% wasn't. Playing Heroes of the Storm both Cassia and espcially Xul basically go: "Oh, so you do exist" when on a team with D3 player class. So, if they had a Nephalem in their group back in D2 they'd be less impressed by the ones from D3. And for some reason, they're pretty good at identifying a Nephalem when they see one.
Using heroes of the Storm as canon is like using super smash Bros as canon
all he uses from heroes of the storm, is their names. And until something else is stated, that is the most reliable cannon we have.
The most reliable aside from the guy who created Diablo 1&2.
Only he didnt
at least i know that li ming is not the playable mage in D3, but someone who existed (you can get her weapon and another item with a little of a story in the description), the same with johanna and valla
natalya was originally from a different group than the assassin. Cain called it the Khral-Harzhek. but apparently they either forgot or retconned that part
I do know that after the mage wars the khral-harzhek where charged with eliminating any one who practiced in the dark arts as magic became very unpopular and religion started to grow in power (again)
Or maybe there were more than one Assassin named Natalya, just like there is plenty of guys named Bob...
@@mrspidey80 I guess its possible that the playable assassin was also named Natalya but that's a weird coincidence considering the two of them meet in diablo 2. I think they just changed her backstory when they were writing the manual for lord of destruction because they forgot about the line where Cain speculates on her origins. Or he didn't actually know where she was from because its a secret group of assassins I don't know.
There is flavor text with the Natalya set in D3 that suggests that the Vij'Katar/Kral Harjek was dismantled by Natalya after she was forced to do something terrible. This is likely the murder of Isendra, and in her remorse she turned her back on the ways of the assassin and became one of the first demon hunters as we see them in D3. I interpreted it as saying Natalya is still alive and fighting the forces of hell still.
Natalya isn't the playable assassin in Diablo II, she's an npc in act III, the playable assassin can even talk to her
I don’t care what Blizzard says, my barbarian from D3 is the same one from D2
Well at least he looks a bit older so it is very well possible.
@@marcuskurze9759 garbage trash male characters. Females are the best
Yay. I’ve been waiting for this.
Diablo II is probably the game I've spent more hours playing than any other. And I didn't know anything about the fate of the characters until now. Thank you!
Wow very informative, thank you for the video.
The d3 necro is also trained either by xul himself or a collegue of xul as mehtan responds to necromancers as if he knows them well
Yep, I was just telling my brother about Mehtan yesterday! That's pretty funny lol.
So many mixed emotions about this game. So much nostalgia, so much anger, so much pain, and so many good times. It could have all ended better for me. This game will forever be bittersweet to me. One of the best games ever made. It really was just magical. Maybe the canonical characters have some history and lore. But mine, I buried mine a long time ago.
before i got diablo 3 i found the free character short stories online. it seemed to me that the barbarian in the short story Wayfarer was the diablo 2 barbarian. there were hints there of it.
This video was awesome. Definitely a thumbs up.
This video was a masterclass in finding ways to say the same thing multiple times but slightly differently.
Cool video man. Interesting on what happened after the fact. Are you going to HC HG again?
I saw somewhere that the Paladin from D2 is a high ranking officer in the Crusader order. I think it was on the Diablo wiki or somesuch. He supposedly "deserted" the zakarun faith because it was corrupted. I think it was this, I saw it a long time ago.
If anyone knows, i'd like to know the name of the set used by the Sorcerer at 5:27, please and thanks !
What about the assist characters? In each act in Diablo 2 there is a npc hireling, Rouge,Mage,Warrior, and also when you get the Lords of Destruction you can hire a Barbarian hireling? Could That one have been present during the Destruction of the world stone as that part of the game was where they all lived?
The Druid went on to found Sanctuary's first magical Furry Convention .
Then the paladin came back and started an inquisition
I wouldn't be surprised the guy talking in d4 intro is the Paladin
4:01 was the Barbarian Renit from the Diablo comics?
Wow that makes me love the Necromancer much more.
He needs his own heavy story-driven game.
Good video mate.
I think they mentioned that the Paladin probably got corrupted or died with the rest of the order since Zakarum fell. Since Crusaders were offshoots of the Paladins who left Zakarum. The Assassin more than likely ties in with the Sorcerer. As for the Druid, I felt that they were still out there, kicking butt.
Often times not knowing is better than knowing. I'd argue that leaving the fates of the D2 characters ambiguous and only hinted at is far more interesting than knowing exactly what happened.
I was expecting a bit more slender and tall necromancer. Here he looks like a body builder who's class is changed to a pirate captain..
Necromancers in training likely have to dig a LOT of graves. You'd get pretty well built from that sort of physical labor.
HaaaAaa the blood runs cold...
We take our loot but don't get old.
What really happened to the necromancer, was moving through some dimension portal to the Warhammer fantasy world and renaming himself to Arch-Commodore Luthor Harkon
Xul had THREE apprentices that we know of actually. One we meet in act 2 and Zayl we meet in act 5 whom was the subject of the Diablo 2 novels and the playable one in the dlc.
With the new Diablo: Immortal trailer, it would appear that the male barbarian is the cannon Barb, since he appears alongside Ling Mi..
Very nice, never knew what happened with the chars in D1 or D2, thanks for the explanation, but theres something that bothed me for years, what happened to Baals soul stone? In D2 we get to know that they can be destroyed only in hellforge but Baal is carrying his around his neck, somehow i just dont believe that the explosion of world stone could destroy the soul stone and if so that means if the stone exist Baal wasnt present in Kuls black soulstone... thanks in advance if i get any insight on this
Paladin is always being my favorite character and classes in this game after the Warrior from D1
Can you put in the description each name with their class? I.E. Amazon - Cass, etc
The Assassin has to be Natalya, the NPC we met in Act 2 since canonically, the Assassin and the Druid joined the other group of heroes in Act 5, Lord of Destruction expansion.
The reason why you can play the Assassin and yet talk to Natalya the same time is cuz leveling, gear, questing etc from the beginning.
When Diablo 3 came out he was the same barbarian but they changed it during production but like several thousands of copies of the game had already been made cause when he rescues Deckard Cain he says I have come to save you again old friends but they edit that out but there are so many games that had it as the original dialogue but they changed it with a patch also so super rare to find one of the copies
We do have information on Nataliya she eventually left the assassins and joined the demon hunters.
I think the Druid went back to his home Isle, Greyhollow. When you kill the Night Howlers, the 'bestiary' for them suggests they are "Part man and part wolf". Greyhollow was corrupted by a demon, so the Night Howlers could have been the druid characters order or students that were corrupted by the demon and 'lost' their humanity. They even use Fire Claw.
We aren't told where the druid came from, so it makes some sense given the "forgotten" nature of Greyhollow Island.
Druids are Barbarians. They are just the religious shamans of the Barbarian clans that guard Mount Arreat.
There was a comic about something similar to that also. Although I'm not sure in the extended universe if any of the main story chars are there, I can't remember. :/ Tons of comics and novels tho.
@@chancepaladin If I remember right, it's in either the strategy guide or the manual for LoD.
I think that this is one of the best Diablo videos here on youtube. Great info!
Diablo II story needs to be a main topic for future games!
Oh diablo 2 how we all miss you and hate what you became lol
What did it become? Last I check it hasn't changed and is still a fantastic game that has held up.
@@gryfincol he meant diablo 3. He misses Diablo 2, but hates how diablo became an empty shell of such a good game
Well, either that or Diablo 2 is such a success it becomes a demon that forever haunts future Diablo games...
D2 Resurrected is on the horizon. forget about D3 and walk again from Khanduras to Aranoch and Kehjistan and finally reach Harrogath and Mt. Arreat. still D2, just in pretty graphics :D
Surely since all barbs as the defenders of the world stone could have seen it? So he doesn’t have to that specific barb?
Legend has it the paladin fights hell's army's to this day albeit with guns now
Sonia is the daughter of the male barbarian from Diablo 2 & 3
Man, I miss my necromancer. When my old com crashed it got rid of my diablo 2 files. What would be cool a diablo RPG like DND and warhammer RPG.
They made a book in that setting for DnD 3e
They're out there. Just kinda rare
There is another hint of the male D3 Barb being the D2 Barb. While running around The Enchantress follower asks the Barbarian what was it like starting out as an adventurer, and the Barbarian points out he somehow ended up in the Rogue camp near Tristram, directly referencing the starting area in D2.
I was pretty sure they were locked in an infinite battle against The Cow King and his legion of hell bovines.
I do believe the mentor of the necro you help in the desert of D3 was the D2 necro.
I like to repeat myself, because I repeat myself. So you know I like to repeat myself. So what we know is that I repeat myself. Which I think is cool when I talk because I repeat myself
is median xl cannon?
Any good lore on the expansion character from the first Diablo? I can barely remember him. He was a like a staff wielding monk or something I think.
Diablo: Hellfire is not canon.
1:10
Sorceress: "Damn it Paladin! Where have you been? The boys are already fighting."
Paladin: "Sorry, I was taking a dump. You know how difficult it is to equip this big fcking armor."
to add something about assassin, in diablo 3 Natalya's Slayer hand crossbow has description that states she left viz-Jaq'taar for unknown reasons and joined demon hunters. Personally i am not fan of that, just shows diablo 3 developers could not come up with new name, high status demon hunter so they just took someone from past and changed its lore in their liking.
Personally i have seen diablo 2 assassin as original character and only sharing her model with natalya, why else she would meet with the actual natalya at act 3 docks.
Also i like to think that it was diablo 2 playable assassin who killed Isendra, not because she betrayed Isendra but because Isendra was growing dangerously powerful and these too powerful mages are known for falling corrupted, for example diablo 1 sorcerer.
Otherwise really fun video. liked!
I would think the sin can still be natalya because the lore was established before the expansion pack lord of destruction was... Meaning the initial assassin lore was based on Natalya, possibly with little to no concept actually behind the release of the assassin character, and due to the clear lack of coding/development in that time I think after the release of LOD they didn't have the means to make it so that she disappeared when playing the assassin character to help better recognize that she was infact Natalya.
@@AustinLmao you do understand that the lore stayed exactly the same when LoD hit, they just delved deeper on some story areas, its not like today blizzard is changing and retcon everything on whim to their absolute need to just keep milking WoW.
Anyway, the lore even before LoD stated that viz-Jaq'taar was an order and orders consist of bunch of people usually. so i think the only logical explanation is that they shared the assassin model from natalya because of time restrictions because holy hell, of course they knew how to code, they had passion for this game and its bad storytelling having two of the same exact characters in one place
They knew how to code? Are you not familiar with d2 LOD? Do you not know about all of the different bugs, glitches, loopholes, client-side vs. server-side issues that the game has had since release due to their spaghetti coding? Issues that have been reported since its release that now almost 20 years later STILL haven't been touched on because credible developers have said themselves this games foundation is absolutely tragic and unfixable... I wouldn't put it past them to release a character that was an NPC and fail to code it.. The original team behind the game even left shortly after so the development team isnt even the same post release, they weren't on the same page.
@@AustinLmao You know, if they would have not known how to code, we would not have any diablo games. sure, there are bugs.
Alot of them and i do think too that they will never be truly fixed unless they do some diablo 2 remake, open the game to its core and start to build & fix it anew.
Also im pretty sure that those bugs was/were bigger challenge than changing the playable assassin head model from its host model.
Still, the game is being played to the fullest to this very day and is very much playable even with its flaws.
so i think you are just nitpicking for the sake of arguing on your last comment
Yep, you meet at least one Necromancer if not two in D3 also, forget the name. Sort of the same deal.
Blizzard throwing shit to the wall to see what sticks. :/
I thought the paladin goes mad and becomes the grand master of the templars (Kormac's order) or was i wrong?
Well, now it's confirmed there's going to be a druid in Diablo 4 and maybe the paladin from D2 is the one it talks about in the crusader books in D3
quality shit bro, subbed.
have to wonder what the palidan thought about fighting beside a legion of undead lead by a necromancer youd think he would try to kill the necromancer once the prime evils are dead
always possible that the barb in d3 is related to the d2 barb and was given the relic of the ancients to view the worldstone....just spit ballin ideas here though :P
In my headcanon, I see the assassin as one of the people who helped found the Demon Hunters after D2
First thing - Heroes of the Storm is non canon for names, genders for all characters like Xul or Sonia - they are just representation of classes from Diablo franchise.
Second thing - we DO know what happened to paladin - he went back to his group which he was send from to help kill Diablo during Diablo II war and later on became one of first crusaders.
TheStasznik Yet in game it states the Crusaders and Paladins started at the same time
just as Rakkis took his army of paladins west. But these crusaders went east on a very different mission
and
He taught them to channel the power of Light, in the same way that the newly founded paladins were being trained
So there’s no way he could’ve become one of the first crusaders
The way you brushed off the barbarian and then shoe horned heroes of the storm into the diablo lore really rubbed me the wrong way.
Agreed. We've all seen the barbarian in D2, did he turn transgender to fit the modern narrative 20 years after the fact? Nothing hints that de Heroes of the Storm barbarian is the D2 barbarian so that's a link that should not have been made ;-) [plus, there are other barbarians that have seen the worldstone so the link between D2 and D3 is equally moot]
I imagine the paladin went to try and fix his order and the druid did the same in a way since the worldstone got blown to pieces and I might be a little rusty on my lore but barbarians protected the stone and the druids are barbarians who took another path so if those characters survived they'd probably try and get their stuff in order considering how much has gone wrong. Also I like how the DI characters all have in game explanations as to what happened to them it was very nice and would have loved if DIII had the same for DII characters.
The Druid probably went back home to Scosglen
Hey I like your videos, but you should do something about the clipping of your voice. It’s not hard to edit that in audacity and it would make it easier on the ears when listening with earphones.
I hope you continue growing.
Barbarian became the God of War.
Interesting video.
They become immortal syndicate...
Then they came to poe betrayal
And this is why one must keep mana shield up at all times...
natalya as the assassin makes sense, because if you play LOD as assassin, I don't believe natalya is there in the docks.
It's been a while since I played it, but I don't remember meeting her there, while playing the assassin.
Pretty sure you can in act 3 (haven't played in forever though) lore wise the assassin (pretty sure it's Natalya) doesn't actually join the fight till act 5.
One of the Diablo III Crusader sets is named after a Crusader named Roland, who took on the name of his master who was also named Roland> Perhaps Roland was the Paladin from Diablo 2?
Natalya has an unused line, and can be found on the game files. It's about her heading North. This north is Act V.
That was just an LoD tease back in Vanilla.
4:05 There is also the possibility that he saw the worldstone through other means that we are just not aware of. I mean, didn't it break through the surface and go all crazy at the end of D2? I do like how you point out that game design error is a possibility. I don't think it would make sense to have an epic hero go back to level 1 for no reason. Different barbarian, there are many lol