How the New 'Smart Scope' Changes Combat
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 жов 2024
- Check out the GunMag Warehouse UA-cam Channel and subscribe: bit.ly/3spZuy3
How did we get to computer powered scopes that calculate bullet drop instantaneously? The ACOG and CCO gave infantry a massive performance boost. It's the first step to soldier augmentation. This is where the real future of firearms will be. We see gun manufactures getting into the development of optics for this reason.
Follow the Host:
/ cappyarmy
Discord Channel Invite: / discord
L3 Harris sent us exclusive footage of the Next Generation Squad Weapon Fire Control System. We interviewed there design team to get all the answers about how this scope will improve the infantry's hit probability at 900 meters and beyond.
Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.
Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.
Want more fun military content and news? Follow Task & Purpose!
Facebook: / taskandpurpose
Instagram: / taskandpurpose
Twitter: / taskandpurpose
taskandpurpose...
Check out our partner's Gunmag Warehouse UA-cam Channel and subscribe: bit.ly/3spZuy3
Do you think this new optic will change how the infantry fights or is it too Extra?
and next time we invade another country hopefully lessons are learnt and we don't give em to allies who will then run away and leave the weapons for the enemy
I want a optic with emotional support thats all
If you are using iron sights you just ain't Rambo enough.
@@sirnuggetsboi9758 We need a woke scope that automatically detects which of the 670 genders the object currently identifies as, the correct pronouns to use to refer to the object you are about to destroy and what it's oppressor/oppressed matrix score is.
I just want an optic that can automatically zero itself.
That's all.
Useful depending on the mission, but at least one person in every squad should have it. That's my armchair commando recommendation.
Isn't that how the acog issued before more could be fielded?
Fuck that everyone in the squad should have one it would make long distance engagements much easier.
@@satiivaindiica true, for long range, but I wouldn't neglect close quarters training, and tactics.
That's my "sitting on the front porch commando recommendations" on the matter!!
@Roy Pham again, true...but isn't this scope supposed to make engagement of targets at long ranges easier for the regular grunt??
Either way, it will under go a few years of development before its integrated into the Army or Marines fully.....
DMR should have it
As a former optronics engineer for the REME I would have loved to work on these systems, utter game changer. One observation is that it still needs the ability to go "dumb" at the flick of a switch for surprise close engagement such as MOFO's coming up the flank.
The big issue that he did *NOT* mention is how this impacts night fighting. Anyone wearing NVGs but not taking the hits directly will instantly see the ranging ping or even get a general lay onto you before you know they're there. With drones this gets even worse.
@@DD-hz3ts Not necessarily. There are Laser Rangefinders that are visible to NVGs but not all of them are.
Any way to shrink it to 1/2 of current size? It sticks up an out more than the mellon that's using it. But can it call in an AIRSTRIKE?! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
@Beaverish Buck Teeth damn beat me to two punches LOL 👍
@@jonandrews9599 simply, yes. Consider what you need to call a strike. Scope already has gps, compas and a range finder.
If I’m remembering correctly, my USMC issued M14 weighed around 12 pounds and I still managed to hit a target at the range 500 yards away in the prone position. Most times in the V Ring. Since I wasn’t a big guy (140 lbs.), I’d say most anyone should be able to handle this weapons system.
Most people are bigger today so they should handle the extra weight easier.
It makes what you did much easier. A chair force secretary could use this effectively.
@@phoenixrising011 100%. With that being said every soldier should be proficient with their weapons system. But on the battlefield in the fog of war when you're sleep deprived this system would be great.
For me it’s spending money on all this brand new equipment meanwhile I can’t drink the water in the barracks without dying.
@@201hastings you bring up a valid point many of us overlook. I did serve and lived in the barracks but that was almost 20 years ago so I forgot about things like that.
PV2 Snuffy: Tries to take a 905m shot.
Scope: "I'm sorry dave. I don't think I can do that."
Good morning Dave!
@@jackraylongiii9663 Push Button Push Button Push Button ! In the Heat of the Aktion ! And you get killed !
"You need to be closer to interact with that target"
You have to buy the long range license!
What I hear from this video is there there is about to be a whole lot of used ACOG's on the market as military surplus. And as I did not get one as I was a POG while I was in the Army 2010-14, this makes me super excited to finally try it out.
Loool
No ty. I'll stick with lpvo. Many times more Superior to fixed power.
@@hawaiiangunner yes, but the prices are high. If OP's hunch is right, those newly-cheap ACOGs could be a middle ground for people saving up for a nice LPVO
@@jsquared1013 true, but I'd rather save for something many times more Superior. I guess it comes down to personal flavor. I have competed in uspsa with both. Acog and lpvo, there's absolutely no comparison.
@@jsquared1013 I'm currently active infantry and if they sell the acogs surplus it better be for real cheap because they are all beat to shit
Hello young brother, you had commented that the previous generation would be skeptical of acogs. I served when LBE was considered body armor. That was over 35 years ago. I believe that all of the kit that you guys have is terrific and I'm JEALOUS. Over the past 25 years you younger troops have used GPS, full view gas masks WITH external filters, body armor, etc... They had just started issuing kevlar helmets and we still were driving jeeps. We had an actual mission on the German border 365 nights. Hell, our night vision gear was the type that attached to an elastic contraption that was worn on your noggin. It had padding where it sat on your face and felt like it weighed about 4 or 5 pounds. We also had a tripod-mounted night vision scope, more like a telescope that weighed around 25 pounds. Anyhow, it was so long ago (haha) that my son is now a veteran. I'd go back in a New York minute. Later Tater. 😎
The Secret Squirrel
glad to hear there are some forward thinking military folks out there! thanks for the comment , my best to you and your son good sir!
Thanks!
The kids these days have all sorts of cool new toys that we didn't have!
I was eating C-Rats with an onion and hot sauce too!
You're way younger than I. The only person that had a scope was the sniper. Body armor was non-existent in the jungle. Helmets were to sit on.
@@ashforkdan yes they were. Plus they were to shave and wash up with. (80-88)
As an 11B for 4 years who prior to BCT/OSUT hadn’t ever fired a weapon and wasn’t immediately issued an optic for my rifle I can tell you that deploying ACOG’s became an immediate force multiplier in our unit amongst the already proficient shooters we had. While any optic from a variable zoom optic to a red dot can increase your target acquisition time in addition to your lethality at various ranges, the huge advantage on the battlefield from what I can see, is that even a unit’s minimum skilled shooters can utilize this technology to match the effectiveness and lethality of their more experienced and battle tested battle buddies.
Yeah UNLESS the technology is Disrupted using EMP coil array... Then you got piss poor marksman relying on technology doesn't make a better soldier.
Dad did it in Nam using a Gerber a Snorkel and Thompson Sub machine gun.. 65 to 68 ECM reconnaissance.
@@mjolnirswrath23 yea, and your dad would get smoked by an modern grunt with an optic.
@@mjolnirswrath23 No? They are EMP hardened. If EMPs are deployed it’s already nuclear war anyway, so no point to anything anyway.
0:55 I remember when the Marines switched over to ACOGs. I went through bootcamp in 2010 w/ a platoon that got a fresh out of the bag rifles, and being told we would be one of if not the last rotations to go through bootcamp with the iron sights. In combat training that fall, we all had ACOGs. It was a point of pride that we all got to overcome the challenge with irons.
That's the same time I went through. Trained on irons in basic and told Kentucky windage is the devil. Get to MCT and receive an ACOG and told you don't adjust the scope for windage, you have to use Kentucky windage with the lines on the scope. Worked well enough and I always shot expert both with irons and optics so both are good in my book.
The Austrian AUG steyr had a 1.5 sight on it as standard in 1978 and it was introduced into Australia when I was serving in the reserves. It instantly increased the accuracy of everyone's shooting, even me, significantly.
In one engagement in western Somalia a baddie fired at an Australian patrol. 7 patrol members fired shots resulting in 6 simultaneous head shots. They are still arguing about who hit the window frame inches from his head. The machine gunner and the point man did not get to fire.
Imagine what that squad could do with a smart sight.
Well integrated optics dates back as far as first British post-war bullpup rifle and G36 and G11 had these as well. In any case, Steyer Aug was far ahead of its time and with some refresh, it could still be incredible weapon.
@@piotrd.4850 check out the Lithgow arms f90
@@jamesh8789 no
I did cadets here in Perth over 25 years ago I was 14, all the WA cadets went to a army base outside of Northam and competed against each other, one of the days we drove to some range and we all got to shoot styres it was sick, it was the first gun I ever shot and I hit 17 out of 20 targets, the targets were 3 different ranges of flip up targets the longest must have been like 250-300 meters and we were laying down
Was the Somalia guy OK?
That compass readout is a game changer in itself when having to call out target acquisitions in combat.
We did all that stuff by hand with a compass, protractor, and a map board. I'm sure you've all heard of the acronym F.E.B.A. Forward Edge of Battle Area. Well, we operated BEYOND the FEBA. This is why we were called "17 pop-ups",
"17 Kill me" (our MOS was 17K, later 96Romeo) That was our life expectancy in '83 in Germany on the border.
Like playing a videogame with that thing... crazy
They just copied it from Fortnite lol
@@raffaelepiccini3405 I understand you children don't get that there was this thing called time before you were born, but things don't revolve around Fortnite, and thank god too because the game is trash as are all BRs.
@@DATWagonator you must be fun at parties
I remember the first time I used an acog. It felt like magic and the confidence boost we got from it was incalculable
“The first thing I noticed about this device was that thing sticking out on top of it…”
11:28 AND 12:15. Lol gotta love editing bugs.
Lol I though my internet lagged out
@@OverlordHD36 same
thanks for catching that! I edited those parts out using the YT editor system it should play without that part in an hour. writing / editing/ and performing the videos myself is a lot of work but there's no excuse for something like that (even though I just made one)
I was like “there was a glitch in the matrix”
@@Taskandpurpose I’m sorry this is a one man team? My respect for you just went up higher and it was already high enough
“every single rank & file grunt has been issued an optic” *laughs in marine*
"Do you know how expensive this gear is, son?"
Marine 1: "You tell me. I only work here."
Marine 2: "Tell that to the insurgents."
Marine 2's answer will be a staple in a few years.
@@Joshua_N-A too true
@@Joshua_N-A this is random, but you reminded me of a time me and my big bro pranked little brother by making him believe there was a "magic stapler" that could turn off TVs
@@Joshua_N-A tell that to the covenant.
“Past 300 years”
Ah yes, when the Marine corps was founded in 1721.
I’m sorry, but this dude seems like a real blue falcon to me.
Idea for DOD: add kill counts and assist. With added competition, soldiers will try to perform better! And after a certain amount of kills, reward them! Say giving them air supports or arty support!
This sounds familiar 🤔
bruh no, treating someones son as a score point is not a good idea
plus if you need arty support you should not have to get kills. get outta here with that cod shit
After 30 kills, you get to call in your own nuke
@@masao2922 it was a joke
@@MrAsullivan12 "bois, I called a nuke, we are going to win!"
"YOU DID WHAT?"
As a former armorer and shooting enthusiast, ..finally, an integrated solution for range/windage calculations. If every soldier is trained in shooting fundamentals with and without this scope; they will be the bad ass we want. The hesitation from big Army was based in this 'fundamentals' issue, I'm sure. Let's hope we don't see a logistics breakdown with batteries 😬
Imagine being in the mmiddle of a war and having to recharge your scope
@@toxik420 you can still use it without battery's or did you miss that bit and im sure they will make it a very quick hot swap click in and out systey like on a drone it takes 3 seconds to change it so just like a mag change or a range adjustments added to the point you wont be alone but haters got to hate i guess
@@Shawnmc-el1pn no hating there bro.. that's a j.o.k.e
I served as a guner on a heavy so I know how effective integrated targeting systems can be. Weight is always an issue! normally infantry already carry armour plus thier loadout .
1-6x is not enough magnification for a caliber that can reach 900 yards. This is a really stupid idea.
I wonder if this system will result in Soldiers/Marines getting lost in their zero with the reticle constantly changing. You range a target at 850m and engage, then have close contact at 150m and forget to re-range in the optic sending everything high. Same thing happens with dialing, you get under stress and get lost in the turrets and forget you already dialed a few MILs. It would seem a fixed reticle but with changing illuminated holdover dots based on the computer input would allow you to use the system for point of aim, but also ignore it for rapidly changing target distances and be able to use it as a traditional holdover reticle. Although hard to tell without seeing the actual reticle and how it changes in use.
i agree
This system was purchased thru TrackingPoint (owned by Talon Precision Optics now) about 5-6 years ago. There was a button on the TP system that you pushed for the laser to recalculate your new known target and it's range. So like flipping the selector switch from safe to semi/fun mode being drilled into a Soldiers head, the optic transfer of one range to another, should also be ingrained the same way. Plus, I'm sure the DOD geeks (SPAWARE/APG/ATEC/etc...) have made it more simple and intuitive (dumbed it down) for the end user.
@@jmiyagisan This is a problem with all the new tech. While it has the ability to provide superior information/capability, it also can increase workload under stress. The less clicky things to mess with the better. Even with old iron sights there’s plenty of anecdotal evidence of soldiers setting the sight for a further range and forgetting it’s set there in combat. I’m not discounting the system as valuable but the way the user interface is will make a big difference in how easy it is to get lost in the settings. Even in precision rifle competition you see competitors forget they have some MILs dialed from a prior engagement and then mistakenly try and use an incorrect holdover.
An extra tilted sight could be good, but that ads more training again.
There will probably be a permanent dot/crosshair in the middle with a layered computer generated over this.
Outstanding production of this video. The story line was well told, the sequencing was spot-on, and the narration was superb. Really well done. You've got talent my friend and you're just getting started.
Couldn't agree more. I was very entertained until the end. I even watched the ad without fast forwarding through it lol
As a guy who has used a acog as civilian in the range. They’re great, my military buddy loves them.
They're not the best optics in the world, but they're definitely the most rugged.
@OVERHAND i just got the sig romeo juliet combo for 250
I played with the acog once in the army, decided I liked the M68 better also know as aim point comp M2. The problem with the acog is it is a scope with a very small rear lens making it hard to acquire targets fast. Once I learned how to use the M68 by purchasing one and mounting it to my personal M4 (spikes tactical ST15) I came to love it. It also saved my but in Afghanistan. With the acog when you have just star light to go by you can't see threw it at all. If you can see your target at all you can hit it with a red dot.
@OVERHAND
Just go to Afghanistan and join the Taliban. Free Acogs for everyone!
@Riorozen
Yeah, I don't like them, either. I predominantly use red dot and magnifier. It's just how I like to train. Home defense and even SHTF defense situation is very unlikely going to be a sniper-type situation. Will most likely be CQB. How many officers, store owners or home owners had to engage a thug at 200 yards? It's a really rare situation. Even in WWII, most engagements were under 100m, which is why carbines and smgs became so popular.
To be fair, when you were explaining ''how did we get from iron sights to smart scopes'', Colt did make a 4x20mm Scope for the M16 Upper Receiver during the Vietnam War. It may not of been standard issue, but it was certainly used in fair numbers. You also have to take into account the AN/PVS-2 Starlight Scope that, while it was bulky, was used as well on weapons such as the XM-21 and M16A1.
Take into consideration that these large systems are developed to improve and scale down over time. Much like features in a car, peak of luxury used to be automatic windows, locks, and A/C, now you can barely find a car without those and more.
Applicant: I'd like to sign up.
Recruiter: Ok, sign here, here, here and here.
Applicant: Uhm wait what, what's that last one for?
Recruiter: We're gonna rip out your spine and replace it with an artifical one, otherwise it would be impossible to carry the hundred pound body armor, 15 pound weapon and all that 6.8mm ammo!
Dont hate that idea.....
Ngl i would totally sign up for any form of transhuman program.
Imagine being able to (with a simple line of code) go from a full punch feeling like a pillow to smashing brick walls.
Cyberneticly enhanced solders would be fucking insane.
@@sonzu-officialmusicchannel640 imagine genetically and cybernetically enhanced soldiers
@@tomizatko3138 Rough transition back to civilian life at discharge time when they extract your enhancements. Solution: send Johnny to a nice transition resort before he goes marching home, to give him some time to get used to his standard-issue human abilities again. I would read that short story. Better go write it first...
@@bazzers too good you should delete comment tbh
@@sonzu-officialmusicchannel640 There were militaries in the past that ran biological experiments on people in the interest of creating super soldiers. They weren’t good guys.
So this is why we left everything in Afghanistan, we knew we were getting new ones so we gave them our hand-me-downs!
Commenting on what is going on in 'Stan really isn't a good idea right now for me. Reading articles about women being stoned to death in 'stan thanks to the US exit (meaning everyone else has to exit too) is forcing my woman to insist that we are getting stoned all the time (as she's fed up with my ptsd keeping her awake)...
But I will just say, Taliban Terry is certainly going to be happy with all his new toys... let's just hope he doesn't begin selling them to the highest bidder...
@@bobbobskin unless the highest bidder is American, then it'll come full circle.
@@bobbobskin I don't know about american weapons durability but when soviet union collapsed wardogs gone to old soviet country and got a bunch of very durable ak's from corrupt officals.I think their countrys future not being known at the time could played a part in corrupt officals that wanted to secure their future. next thing I know is ak 47 was most common weapon in terrorist organisations. at the bright side american guns get cheaper in illegal gun market at the dark side you and me cant buy these m4s and very probably a jhonny somewhere in the world will get shot from them by terrorists
@@bobbobskin where war is weapons flow. and where the war plus oil is americans plus weapons flow. This wont end well for american troops
@@mahmutyordamli4912 Or anyone else within 600yds...! 🇬🇧
As someone who partakes in astronomy and loves how a telescope mirror that costs a couple hundred bucks today, is so far above the loftiest heights of the best optics of the past in terms of shape and reflectivity. And as someone who sees that the quality of lenses today is at a level that kings would have sold their heirs to get a hold of in centuries past. I welcome the US Army to 1850.
funny that
Back in '04, we were one of the only units in the army to have the optics and lasers. By the time I got out in '08, even the national guard was getting the cool toys.
I joined the USMC in 95', and was pretty damn good with iron sights. I was skeptic of the acog, but learned to REALLY trust it!
History of optics is quite retarded, people who used them were getting tons of kill counts while sadly humanity shows, it took 'decades' for the best militaries to catch onto why optics and certain things that existed are important to have. After USMC were issued ACOG, the amount of accurate shots to head on dead combatants went up tremendously, according to public sources. No reason not to trust something that is just a magnifying glass, and in this case fire calculations for point-and-aim will only increase lethality further with even less training. Good to see there is finally a potential for no people on the ground dying while still being lethal and able to carry out a mission using this future technology.
@@BlackOps78321 ware fare will soon evolve into drones. I’m sure the computers in these scopes will be good enough to operate the gun itself in the future.
Iron sights all day the fundamentals count
@@melt6894 drones will play a much bigger role but one thing that has always persisted despite all innovations trying to replace it and that is the basic Infantryman sorry you need the human factor involved making those judgment calls.
@@2kfanatical113 I love shooting with Iron sights but I love shooting with optics more I mean it's all about maintaining both.
"Slower moving infantry", well, yeah. You don't need to be very fast when you're taking out the baddie in 1 shot from another zipcode
🤣🤣🤣
I was in 3/2 when we tested the M4 MWS 21 years ago. Man, did we break a lot of things nobody thought we could break!
In February, 2004, I was in a Marine infantry unit as we entered Iraq with an M16A2 service rifle with iron sights and no doors on our humvees.
Drove up to Al Taqqadum where the Army was located and they all had Gucci M4s with Aimpoints and 203s. Only our SNCOs had any optics. We continued our entire deployment, including ops in Fallujah, Iskandyriah, and Haditha, like that. Some of the "lucky" Marines had A4s, but many of us still had the A2s.
I'm 2005, I was back in Fallujah with an ACOG, but I wasn't able to properly sight it in, so I found myself using a penny to sight it in during firefights. Good times.
We make do lol
Smart Scope? Does it come with a Glados voice? Does it playfully make fun of you when you miss a shot?
If not, I don’t want it. 😤
sounds like something out of CyberPunk 2077 haha / your example of glados was better
Imagine if they programmed R. Lee Ermey into the thing; "You call that shooting? WTF is wrong with you, maggot?! Are you effing blind? You literally cannot hit the side of a freaking barn! Stevie effing Wonder could have shot better than that!!"
@@Taskandpurpose na we just want mida multi tool irl
I want one with a customizable voiceline function. a 500 meter headshot will give a tarkov "dudung" SHIB sound
@@Taskandpurpose goddamn Clippy. Uh, I mean Skippy...
Civil War snipers were also one trick ponies as they were slow to load. They achieved accuracy by having a polygon shaped bullet and a barrel that twisted (rather than having rifling grooves). These were exactly as difficult to forge and load as they sound, and it fouled up after a few shots.
You can mean like the early octagonal barreled Whitworth rifle ?
@@patricofritz4094 I think that's what it was called, yeah.
@@samsonsoturian6013 yeah it was amazing to use in the Civil war fascinating technology
*some* civil war snipers. some had sharps rifles which used round bullets with traditional rifling. whitworth rifles were very expensives. i almost certain most civil snipers had sharps.
@@richardlooch2109 Many of Berdan's Sharpshooter corps had the Sharps. Whitworths (from England) were more common on the South's side, iirc, precisely because they had to source almost all their arms from overseas vendors, or capture them from the North. And when the vast majority of everyone involved are using ML rifles, being stuck with a Whitworth that takes a couple extra seconds than a different ML to reload isn't that big a deal; a sniper is going to take far more time setting up the shot than reloading anyway...
I'm writing a tabletop campaign set in the late 21st century, and your insights into the NGSW project are really helping me flesh out the weapons.
How's your campaign's program coming along?
Sombra player, that checks out. Good luck with the campaign!
I’m my opinion, I think this kind of scope should only go to marksmen or snipers cuz they can put it to the best use. Infantry men, with the conditions and combat they get into, could either break, lose, or not get a great chance to use it
It's no more fragile than the optic they already have.
I think the military is trying to increase effective range for the entire squad. Letting you take out enemies without risk of return fire.
Taliban terrorists are looking forward to their new equipment.
@@brucewayne3892 j'y
They would make better use out of running shoes under Biden
Well... Put in a few more billion bucks to develop a pulse fire mechanism and a self-steer/stabilize platform... It''ll be a Colonial Marines Smartgun!
yes i love that space-MG42
There's already commercial solution with android that uses electric trigger that once you tag&track it fires when barrel is aligned properly.
I imagine this thing on an LMG with a constant-recoil operating system (like the Ultimax-100 or Knight's LAMG) would be a nightmare for adversaries to confront.
Though I wonder how long it will take for infantry to be equipped with some kind of laser warning system.
@@JinKee I've heard that tankers will just use the ground in front of their target for range finding to avoid tripping laser warning systems, but it doesn't seem feasible for large scale infantry operations. I suppose you just constantly trigger the enemy's alarms until they get frustrated and turn them off, thinking they are broken?
@@sir_vix now your countering modern solutions with oldscool problems lol.
Yay, a Singaporean gun
5:35 NOTE: rifling already existed for a long time even as early as the 1600s - a rifled bore was just more difficult and slower to reload compared to smoothbore muskets
This is why experimental light infantry units such as the 95th Rifles back in the Napoleonic Wars used rifles (they were tasked as skirmishers to either thin down enemy units, or to provide longer-distance fire support for the line infantry during major combat)
They were often sent forward to snipe enemy officers. Their green jackets were a basic attempt at camoflage.
@@simonhibbs887 Actually light infantry regiments in the Napoleonic Wars also attempted camouflage by dulling the color of their uniforms (such as the Austrian Feldjagers dull grey clothing or the Grenzers who wore brown) to help them blend with the fog or the trees
The British 95th's green jackets were also used to camouflage them behind bushes, but in general the uniforms were for battlefield identification to help army commanders quickly identify their armies' unit dispositions in the battlefield through a telescope before any potential major engagement.
And yes, the 95th were often targeting French officers in the Peninsular War as their rifles could accurately shoot for nearly 200 yards compared to the French Chasseurs' 80-100 yards with their smoothbore muskets.
"a rifled bore was just more difficult and slower to reload compared to smoothbore muskets"
True until the invention of the Minié Ball.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini%C3%A9_ball
@@michaelmorris4515 I was talking about the rifling in 1600s firelocks, not the Crimean War and American Civil War-era rifles that used them, but okay
@@VentiVonOsterreich I understand that. My answer applies because it's the invention that solved the problem. If the Minie ball had been invented earlier, it would have been used earlier.
The Army: we’re investing millions of dollars into futuristic scopes so you can stack bodies out to 900 meters because that’s the future of warfare.
Also the Army: we’re investing millions of dollars into underground close quarters training programs because that’s the future of warfare.
first half of the war, second half of the war.
I’m sure it’s To prevent the World from making a “They had us in the first half meme” of the US
@@ItsJoKeZ
I think it’s generally agreed by this point in that the first half of WWIII will last about 45 minutes 📢📢
🚀 💥 ⚠️ ☠️ ⚠️ ☠️
I'll never understand the Military worrying about purpose built CQB weapons systems. If you simply adopt a rifle and ammo combo like the hk416 and mk262 or m855a1 that is effective out to 600 yards then it will be effective at 10 yards. Are soldiers really needing to take another 2 or 4 inches off their rifle for cqb? Seems like an m4 or hk416 is already small enough.
@@smithnwesson990 When kicking doors and clearing confined spaces? Seems pretty advantageous to me... from the safety of my sofa lol :P
As a generation or two before your generation I have always thought using iron sights was a few years behind the time. However being a Marine I knew the only guys that get scopes are snipers and recon. Ive been retired since 95 and am extremely happy to see the USMC finally get with the program. The Marines have always been known for good shooters and maybe now they will be a lot better. Now if they just don't get the Armys hand-me-downs.
At last, someone that recognizes that optics as a standard issue is THE biggest reason for increase in soldier lethality over the last 30 years. Every 5-6 years you get armies throwing out competitions to replace the AKs/M16s/M4s in use, defence companies put out all sorts of fancy digital rifles with new digitally designed bullets that do everything *except make it easier to get a bullet in the other guy's stomach* ,and governments are not stupid, they cost ten times more per rifle, ten times more per bullet, but give no benefit in terms of getting lead where it counts, so they get trashed, and they carry on using the AKs/M16s/M4s.
However, optics allow you to do in 3 bullets what would normally take a soldier 3 mags.
It's not really that hard. I was making head and center mass shots at 500 yards with an A1, 800 with an A2 heavy barrel and M85 cartridges with just iron sights and my Clark Kents. Learn to shoot properly and you don't need fancy stuff that's useless when the battery runs out.
Semper Fi!
Fox 2/1
@@ChrisLichowicz While this might not be a game changer for professional soldiers , it would be for conscripts/reservist who the goverments dont give time/funds to go to range more then once a year. (Not talking about the US)
well said, I agree with all , save,, governments are not stupid, they are that and beyond. don't like battery powered, that needs work. and i truly hope ALL soldiers receiving this will be taught the old fashioned way 1st.
@@ChrisLichowicz you’re shooting at stationary target, not targets shooting back at you
solid comment
I look forward to auto pilot guns and our inevitable firearm based lifeform overlords.
I voted for Kang.
@@BatCaveOz all hail Kodos!
This is the way
Terminator technology already exists. Just a matter of time before Boston Dynamics's Atlas is clearing rooms full of "baddies" with a few perfectly placed shots... *searches used EMP guns on gunbroker*
@@rob6850 Yeah all it’s going to take is one good electromagnetic pulse to stop all that lol
That red dot is 4” above the bore, a little bit of tilt puts the round solidly into the backdrop.
Damn that is amazing. I went into the Army using iron sights and transitioned to the ACOGs and that was such a boost to my shooting. This next gen scope looks like a real game changer. But we will see its functionality once it reaches the private.
It's bullshit. I have an 1-6x and it's still not enough to reach 900 yards, or even 600 yards, from what I'm hearing from civilians using LPVO's. Their fancy computer won't fix that stupid decision. Poor planning, pipe dream.
If they invested in better training and just the LPVO itself, it could be much better. Instead, we get the MCX Spear (which can NOT handle mud) and this "meteorologist" overkill 2.5lbs piece of shit.
I'd rather run a 6x ACOG (machine gun variant) than this system. Take my chances w/ a .308 over the 277 Furry.
In a dynamic firefight there will be no time to fiddle with the fancy scope...you gotta run, hide, crawl, return fire in a hurry from various position at various distances. This scope is a specific tool for a specific task.
I agree we have lost touch with BRM.
My understanding was that if you kept it at 1.5x and didn't touch anything it'd just work as normal. Thus you'd only have to "fiddle" when choosing magnification.
One button click to activate automatic mode does not sound fiddly 🤷♂️ But what do i know. Not a soldier, I'm just a sucker for tech
I quote: this happens in a fraction of a second
When coupled with 6.8 ammo, this new optic is gonna be a true game changer.
For snipers, they can make a similar version, but with more magnification as well as the special windage auto adjust features.
This and the new night vision goggles are insane. Imagine having this on the NGSW 6.8x51 DMR. Troops could be in a sniper position, firing from behind cover with only the barrel exposed.. and be incredibly lethal.
Barrel Exposed?🤔😳🙄...Not!...This scope is all wrong for a battle weapon...For stationary acuation or even sniper situations yes...but Not for troops that are running and moving with a battle weapon and everything is done fast.
Infantry/small arms are completely pointless to upgrade. Enemy is just going to use rockets, missles, etc.. would have been better off investing money in an invisibility cloak!😅
@@isaakjunkeer785 War cannot be won without infantry
@@jakelavaclaw2759 that’s not what he said
@@CyVinci It kind of is.
What's the go with the laser rangefinder and EMCON concerns? Reliably hitting a "baddie" at 900metres sounds wild. Technology should be going the other way though, less accurate but more plasma rounds. I want Stormtroopers!
Whilst it'll be cool to watch, for some strange reason I think the 1st gen is going to get a lot of over penetration kills. Unless the firearm fires a pellet which creates a magnetic/gravity field which the plasma is contained in and when that pellet hits a target it turns of the field allowing the plasma to disperse "safely" leaving a crater in the target.
If future engagements are further out with weapons that would defeat body armor then it would make sense that the infantry would drop the body armor to move faster and carry new heavier gear
Body armour is also there to reduce wounds from artillery/mortars. Some degree of body armour will likely remain.
I think it's really cool that you're covering the NGSW so closely. Hard to come by information elsewhere that doesn't just seem to be a rehash of your stuff.
Aircraft use a system called “CCIP” for placing dumb bombs. Tanks use something similar to place shots, showing you where to point your gun to put a round on the target. . Old battleship guns require you to hold the trigger, only fire when the shot is lined up to account for the rolling of the sea, and use a (mechanically encoded) program to compute an aiming point given the relative motion of the target, rotation of the earth, etc. Rifles can use advanced versions of these software to place shots with accuracy approaching 100%. This is really, really old technology, shrunk down.
It would go a little like this:
Target acquired and lazed for ranging.
AI begins to track the target and generates aimpoint; compensating for target motion by changing the aimpoint if motion mode selected.
Soldier pulls trigger, and holds it, while aligning rifle with aimpoint. Rifle calculates aimpoint continuously based on rifle’s orientation in space, and automatically discharges when aligned with aimpoint. Bullet hits target with perfect accuracy.
Combining these with a more portable barrel length and para-style stock would make for some insanely maneuverable yet insanely accurate direct action carbines! I can already see how Special Ops guys will integrate these, and it's beautiful.
You have no idea what you're talking about. Special Ops? Please stop.
@@andrewb325 lol whatever bro. If you wanna go around with that attitude you can take whatever you were gonna reply and shove it up your ass, chief.
“The most overlooked of important pieces of a weapon……… the scope.”
I see what you did there, Cappy! ;)
The ups - The increased maximum engagement range can be a massive advantage; Assuming the area of operations allows for it. The increased accuracy of shots means that higher caliber arms can be used without the risks involved in the massive increase in load slowing the operator down (due to the increase in range).
The downs - This might result in operators getting out of touch with the basics; If the battery goes out or there is a malfunction (accidental or sabotage), the operator might be caught flat-footed in an engagement. The sensor suite can potentially be vulnerable to scrambling or jamming. And to go back to the operators, another risk is them ending up overly relying on the scope, resulting in situations where they might try relying on it when they need to be thinking on their feet; That would be a curse of it becoming too good a system only though.
Finally, the issue of the maintenance requirements of the scopes; I don't know how well the old wisdom holds up, but most operators are notoriously sloppy with their weapon maintenance. If the scope is maintenance heavy, or requires some special skills to maintain, it might hamper it's overall longevity, causing an otherwise great tool to fall out of favour.
PS - The reason why scopes are rarely talked about as firearm enhancement is after their large scale adoption, they just became a well known quantity for most, I believe. When it is implicitly decided what scope you need for the job, the question becomes what the other trinkets should be.
Over reliance to anything is usually combated with training without it. Especially if this optic were to fail extra training I would assume would be taken in order to allow operators to still utilize redundant features in order to remain in the fight until they can get back and replace/repair the optic.
It also would take a ton of time to aim, press those buttons so it calculates everything ect.
@@valentinglivenko9802 It's a single button press, the BCU will be done calculating in a split second...
After watching Soldiers use their rifles as levers to pull tent stakes out of the ground or break packing straps off boxes or as a hammer, etc. it will be interesting to see how the new system holds up.
the heavier our infantry becomes, the closer we get to exoskeleton heavy infantry.
Just a matter of time until we have real-life Halo Spartans.
Which becomes a tank or apc
Put guns on your robo mules and cut out the middle man
@@thisisjeffwong Don't give them any ideas.
Space Marines when?
I wonder if the weight of the optic makes General Dynamics happy, it could possibly upset the bullpup balance I hear people complaining about.
since there would be even more weight towards the rear of the gun you're saying?
@@Taskandpurpose That's probably what he's getting at. Bullpups are naturally rear heavy so they counterbalance the weight of anything attached at the front or middle of the rifle. Definitely something the GD people would bring up to their advantage in the final deliberations to select the winner.
@@Xhaleon I think task & purpose is trying to say it won't help with balance. Because the optic is closer to the back where the weight is already focused. If the optic were positioned at the very top of the rifle, it would help.
i think this would push the bullpup out of compitition..all the weight would be held by the gunners arm and shoulder. you dont have anything on the front it will be unbalanced and would be harder to shoot. the front would just recoil like a wild horse on full auto
The weight of the scope is not concentrated in the rear. It's in the middle, with the suppressor at the front and mechanism in the rear. It's the perfect ballance for a system around 13 lbs or close to 6 kg. If anything, this will be an advantage for the bullpump. I'm sorry to say it traditionalists, but the bullpump will probably win. A rifle of this weight build around a bullpump design will be able to get the the cross hairs on target quicker than the two other competitors. On top of that, the ammo is also lighter than Sig's.
"If the enemy is within range, so are you." Murphy
Not with these sights! At 900 yards their bullets may fly but it is unlikely effective fire. At 900 yards you can effectively take their head off. Big difference!
@@76MUTiger Not in a near ambush with ied’s
a scope with a bearing reading is a gamechanger, everything with this system is going to be huge but THAT is perhaps the one I'm most excited about even if its the least impressive
the time saving alone can save a lot of lives
Do you know if that bearing is True or magnetic?
@@boblynch2802 doesn't really matter as long as everyone is using the same reference.
The key problem of this "progam" is issuing an optic with a ballistic computer to troops that still don't grasp what a mil and minute of angle is. The history and overview presented here was very good. Thanks!
my personal position is that the optic needs a slow roll out because there are some fast moving advancements. the slow roll is so that the military doesn't head dive into an optic and can settle on a better cheaper one later.
What happens in the civilian market is totally different to the military market due to testing. Could you imagine if Lisa Su was in charge of a defence company. Every other year she'd release a product that crushes the last gen with a small increase of price. It could be years before a suitable replacement comes on to the military market, and I think we're going to need them types a scopes a lot sooner than later.
Sorta like how they dove into the F35L2 program that failed utterly?
@@stewartleslie3292 grunts always have the option to use their own optics
Oddly enough, this scope does all the same things videogames do to make sniping easier.......
It's literally the smart scope from HALO.
@@zacker150 soon we will have Halo guns. Tempted to start making my own functioning Halo guns in real life.
@@howardbaxter2514 do it.
Real-life imitating art. That's not the first time the military has done that either. Kinda scary really.
They must have been playing sniper elite.
This is really interesting. As an infantryman in the 07 we were excited about the ACOG's when our battalion got them.
This is pretty sick. They took the basics of a tank fire control system and were able to slap it on a rifle. I'm just curious how good it is in a close quarter fight. A lot of times you dont need to shoot out that far.
Good point. At 1x, it is as fast an any other variable powered scope. The etched reticle is always in the field of view, and you have the option of illuminating the horseshoe or selecting a single dot.
I'm pretty sure the military is trying to eliminate any CQB for non spec ops groups.
@raynaldo arlen k.eman Nah, M4s and M16s go brrrrr now :(
It's going to suck azz for cqb. Guys are going sling the rifle and pull a pistol. They have no choice really. You're talking about doing CQB with a 13 lb rifle that you can't see over the top of the reticle because all of that laser crap is blocking your vision. But this rifle is an unbelievable DMR package!!!
For a DMR - maybe. For "everyone" normal carry, patrol, or CQB - O Hell No! I hugely prefer a light rifle with a Red Dot (2moa or bullet drop reticle) mounted away from my eye(fast and effective to 300+-). A magnifier is added for distance work out to 600-700+. A light weapon is quick to get on target and easier to maintain holding it up in front (shouldered) for an extended time. "Up-Close" happens fast and is most dangerous, getting on target fast keeps you alive. Leave the heavy, complicated longer range stuff for when "Up-close" is not a threat.
Case in point. In Vietnam a firebase was under attack. A grunt with a 1911A1 was running around the corner of a structure, as was a VC with an AK47, in the opposite direction. They actually collided at the corner. Who won?
The grunt with the 45 center punched the VC, collapsing him like a sack of potatoes. Speed indeed kills.
On another note, it's doubtful a single 9mm impact would have worked as well with FMJ.
This scope clearly has a close ranged optic mounted on top.
@@jacobharrison8581 I think thats a range finder
@@GiantspaceballsYo idk I didn’t watch the full vid cause I’m at work. But if that’s the case then I agree
@@GiantspaceballsYo but at the same time there are side mounted sights that some “high speeds” use for clearing rooms. I personally just can’t my weapon to the side and keep my same cheek to stick weld as I normally would and I can hit close targets without optics at all. Most everyone else does the same
Back in the 80's I was part of testing iron sights against the new gen of optic sights. I was in the British Army and we were using the LA1 A1, or the SLR 7.62mm. At both short and long distance the iron sights managed to get more rounds downrange with a higher hit ratio. This was due to knowledge of shooting and wider target view. With sights the shooters had to seek targets through the optics which took longer.
During the first Gulf war I was amused that American forces had a habit of holding their weapons over their heads, if behind a wall for example, and just spraying rounds towards the enemy in the hope of hitting the target. They called it fire suppression, we called it a waste of ammo. So I would say that SF Forces could benefit from computer type sights and also snipers. But for your average grunt? It's just something else he can break.
That's embarrasing
I am not military but a rifle shooter. If you can't shoot well using iron sights an optic aint going to help. At my local range I regularly hit a gong out at 500m with my 80 year old 303 and watch guys with their modern rifles and scopes hit the dirt. They look at you gob smacked. Fundamentals of shooting are more important.
@@hjagger
Your choice of .303 is great. I've many hours of range time with it. It was such a good weapon that the Brit Forces converted many of them to 7.62 so snipers could use them without having to carry a different kind of ammo.
I can see them getting into trouble with this one; when the Trijicon ACOG turned combat into "whack-a-mole" our guys were accused of execution killings because of the rediculous number of well placed head shots. 😂
Hahah! That's why the .223 does have its specialty: wide open spaces! Keep those, with optics out in the desert. Bring the higher calibers into the woods and underbrush.
The mission is to kill the enemy. Accurate lethal fire increases mission accomplishment with fewer friendly casualties.
The M5 6.8x51 has a flatter trajectory than the 6.5 Creedmore.
Well, it is an execution, isn't it? just from a little bigger distance. The problem is that the enemy will have this technology also after a few years.
@@12vibaba Tracking Point has been around for decades. Yet not much proliferation.
I could see a Squad Designed Marksman having one of these, initially...at least until they have enough to roll-out to everyone. 2.5 lbs. is a little chunky and it sits high on the rifle. I think everyone will want to run a vertical Grip-Pod to counteract the torque on the rifle from the high center of gravity.
All the new combat tech and optics developments we are seeing are _really_ incredible - but one has to wonder at what point it becomes _"too expensive to loose troops"_ or _"too much danger of equip. falling in to enemy hands"_
You lose a patrol of guys with Next Gen Weapons, NG-NVG, NG-Optics, Targeting Computers and other assorted toys, you're gonna start having some really bad days..
Or if the President abandons a War Zone, leaving billions of taxpayer $ State of the art equipment and Civilians behind.
@@Yarrb53 haha 😂👍🏻
I personally don't see this going over well.
"Will it work without batteries?"
"Yes, it's still a scope."
"So that's a no, then."
"What if one of the sensors breaks?"
"It's still a scope."
"So the private who trained on the working system is just fucked, right?"
"It'S StiLL A SCopE!"
You know what else is "still a scope"? An actual LPVO with a Horus reticle.
They would probably equip them with some kind of solar charger.
The etched reticle will always be displayed. The disturbed digital reticle and ballistic calculator require power.
@@justiceofbook it's already so low power I honestly think the best idea would be to reuse the gas from firing to charge the battery.
The best part about this for me is..... this is a 13 + pound rifle. Most people do not understand what that means.
I've always been an open sight shooter because I have a hard time locating the target with a scope, then I'm shaky once I do. But, now I've discovered dot open sights and it has been a game changer for me. I have two Sig Sauer Romeo MSR's And two Holosun HS510C-GR open reflex sights kitted out on my various rifles. Watch out squirrels!
Both eyes open .. me too .. started with shotguns.. then had to train hard to keep both eyes open with a scope.. its hard but you can see what's out and around you rather having tunnel vision.
i think the optic looks really cool and i like the rotating movement to change the magnification. However i would equip half of the soldiers with it and the other half should get the scope without the range finder
this is exactly what I was thinking too. I was surprised when they said the plan was to equip every single infantryman with this big scope. It must be a part of a larger strategy / doctrine plan that isn't fully clear to me yet . although I do have my suspicious that its about longer range engagements
@@Taskandpurpose maybe they equip themself for the events that battlefield 42 predicts. I mean climate is changing and the taliban just got american and german military equipment!
Oh man i hope i dont find myself in a battle royale
@@Taskandpurpose cheaper in bulk
I have a feeling this is about who we will be fighting next, " China". Think in that direction and a lot of things start to make more sense. Look at the marines, navy, and what the air force are acquiring and how they are training.
Just give me a variable power FFP ACOG with an ACS reticle.
Some great potential capabilities. But one thing can't be changed. Ounces equal pounds, pounds equal pain. Sometimes moving fast matters most. There is give and take with everything though.
I'm really starting to think that like the 90s the army is gonna take the Optics and ditch all three rifles.
Optics, and the polymer cased ammo stay, the rifles go.
The quandary: the optics on an M4 make no sense (the rifle isn't effective out to 800+ meters) while the 6.8 rifles without the LR optics are overkill at shorter ranges. The NGSW offerings are just too heavy, too clumsy and too expensive, particularly for our military at this "woke" time. NGSW is going nowhere.
"We've designed a 6.8 M4 variant"
"Well take the scope tho"
@@jtpowell162 well seeing a person at 300 yards is like a spec and in an acog you can get head shots at 400+ yards easy. Not sure why you wouldn’t wanna have that magnification. You can work 25 yards to 400 just by going from red dot to chevron back to red dot.
@@user-vp9lc9up6v thats the sig ngsw
Literally learned how to shoot on the M16A4 with the ACOG, I can honestly say I totally took it for granted. Shooting targets at 200-300yards is so incredibly easy with that thing.
When I started buying and building my own rifles with red dots and irons, I started to appreciate how incredible that optic is. I have particularly bad astigmatism as well, and the etched prism ACOG is miles better for me than any red dot or holographic sight could ever be. For me, its totally worth the 1400 asking price.
Every time I learn something new about the NGWS my idea finds more confirmations: this system will not be adopted for every soldier, because in urban combat or CQC a 5.56 SBR with a red dot is superior to this weapon in every aspect, however this package sound absolutely perfect fo a designated marksman. Thanks to this technology you need far less training to field a designated marksman and you drastically reduce the human error from the equation. The army will end up having more designated marksmen in their ranks and the NGWS will also help to ease of the weight of automatic riflemen by giving them a new, lighter LMG. Basically if I had to guess the NGWS program will not replace the 5.56 component of the army but the 7.62x51 LMGs and DMRs with a new 6,5 system.
Never hurts to have every soldier capable of being the marksmen. The marine made every guy a 249 gunner with the M27.
Pretty cool......that said, I'm hearing the military is training new recruits with red dot sights and that the old iron sights are gone......personally I think EVERYONE should start with iron sights and have these fundamentals hammered into their heads until its rote. Then, you can move onto these sights. Anything can happen with these sights, but the iron sights and basic fundamentals will always keep you in the fight....and I've started from irons and moved up to red dots/ ACOGS ect....
Iron sights, Vietnam. 50,000 bullets to kill one enemy combatant.
ACOG, global war on terror. 250,000 bullets to kill one enemy combatant.
Make of that what you will.
I went to basic less than a year ago and we trained on iron sights first then moved to the cco
If it is electronic, it gives off a signal. If it is an iron sight or a glass sight, no signal. If the other party has the ability to detect the use of electronics at that scale, you are just telling them exactly where you are. Something to think about. You might say "Well, no one can do that ..." yet.
@@alterego157 yes cuz a jungle is comparable to a massive vast desert full of mountains n such. Smh very dumb comment dude.
@@AnUnknownPlayer. Data is never dumb, dude
Huge advantage in long range engagements, especially at night. Extra weight huge disadvantage in close combat. Obviously best solution is a separate weapon for close quarters… pistol or sub gun.
There you go: sidearm. And they can make long barrel rifles into shorter, compact machine pistol styles.
They're getting ready to fight China.
This is a lot of money (and weight) for a doctrine that achieves accuracy through volume, and wins battles by maneuver while suppressing the enemy. If this is coming to fruition, we're going to have to take a hard look at some small forces doctrine (Switzerland comes to mind) in how to fight; all while keeping in mind that urban is likely the next major fight environment.
Regarding the weight, I imagine it can/will become lighter as the technology matures and they can remove redundant parts/miniaturize/change materials
Probably, but the glass elements are where the bulk of the weight is derived. They’ll drop in weight some, but lenses haven’t changed much in 200 years, and unless they find a way to make lighter glass, any optic requiring multiple elements(ie anything with mag) is gonna have some heft.
But hey, if anyone can pay to find a way to make lower density glass, it’s US taxpayer dollars.
@@HE-162 hah, yeah, I forget just how heavy good glass is.
Unloaded bear rifle plus suppressor weighs 9.8 lb. Optic weight 2.5lbs 12.3lbs now add ammo. Now show me how you shoot and move!😅🤣😂 now give it to females!!! Plus way heavier recoil! Qualifications are going to be hilarious!!!
Seems quite sensible to have an optic like that, however shouldn't it be welded/fixed to the frame to negate movement of the optic after firing the weapon? If the optic is meant to assist in target acquisition at longer ranges even the slightest movement may affect accuracy
And how would that help, exactly?
This system will inevitably change tactics in modern war. It will be like a sudden proliferation of snipers on the front lines, keeping the enemy pinned down and interfering with their ability to fire and maneuver. I don't know what it will be like if every frontline soldier has one, but big changes will occur.
Original title: How the new Smart Scope will fall into the hands of our next enemy (that we totally made up, because monneh!)
couldn't have said it better....lol
this is why American citizens are supposed to be armed like military as part of their rights. All enemies FOREIGN and domestic. No one dreams of invading American because it's a potential 100 million man army. Best they can do is "terrorize" the nation... sad that is is so effective that people will give up their own personal liberty and defense for the illusion of safety.
Was thinking the exact same thing!
Was thinking the exact same thing!
As these become more common I would expect soldiers to be equipped with laser detectors on their torso. This would allow some warning that you are being targeted before the round flies. Similar to fighter jets getting an audible tone telling them they are being locked by an enemy fire control system.
The problem is it would be really easy to disturb a squad greatly with just a cheap laser pointer. I mean what use would those things be if you get an false alarm 9/10 times and you would always have to take cover. Especially in an urban environment it would increase the stress drastically.
@@nukularpictures You are assuming that would work. I don't believe these targeting lasers are using the same wavelength as a pointer. I'm sure the tech exits to differentiate between the two. Besides, even a false alarm would remind you that you are exposed to fire which is not a bad thing.
@@TheBruces56 I mean sure. They are IR lasers normally and having a certain pattern the laser itself costs cents. As does the microcontroller you would need to generate the same pattern. There will be no tech to differentiate that. If an enemy wants to do that you have no chance. They will be able to distribute and build the decoys for little money.
And no. A false alarm would be really dangerous in an urban environment. Just think that someone is targeting you from one direction. So you take cover behind objects. But in fact the enemy is in the exact opposite direction and now you are not moving and open to fire with no real way of retreating. It would be devastating.
If that would even happen once the trust in the laser detectors would be destroyed and no one would use it.
@@nukularpictures Some of what you say may be true. However, I tend to think if the enemy has a shot at you he will take it rather than use a laser pointer. My original point was that for every weapon innovation there will soon be one to mitigate it. I do appreciate your insight.
Won't work, you dont actually need to laser your target. Few meters off and you still have an accurate firing solution. Also, I bet the more modern/passive targeting systems wont give you any indication of a lock on a jet either.
As long as the sight does not interrupt you by saying: "We've been trying to contact you about you car's warranty . . ."
"It looks like you're -writing a letter- trying to take a long range shot, would you like some help?"
Or a windows update.
I used to work for L3-Harris or more precisely when it was independent Insight Technology and used to work on these scopes years before they would even be published to the public.
I personally love the idea of using and training with the most high tech we can but to also supplement that training with the very basics so there is a fall back if things go wrong with your equipment.
And they should Let China take out a couple of GPS satellites, no GPS. Batteries die out or an EMP is exploded, no electronics.
cappy sees slower moving infantry, i see infantry with bionic legs hooked into the optic to calculate and absorb recoil while moving soldiers at 30 mph
my god
Warhammer predicted it. Spess Mahreens!
I remember the OICW rifle had that gigantic optics that was able to give range inputs to its grenade launcher.
This channel is effing awesome! Congratulations to you and your team.
But ya know, there's such an aesthetic to early Aimpoint optics and ACOG scopes
I think they will definitely find a way to reduce/streamline this - look at laser sights from 1970/80s, they were massive, compared to PEQ-15 etc, I think in 10 years this battle-comp style sight will be common and easy to carry, though probably not affordable for most civvies.
What is Russia and China have to destroy this new electronic sight!
They were pretty much non existant until the Abrahms and Bradley.
@@hermanfurlong8824 Hell, Biden will probably sell it to them!
Imagine if it had a voice hit confirmation with "Boom! Head Shot"
First thoughts/concerns are size,weight, and reliability, but that was a concern with early optics too no doubt. That's a lot of electronics to hope does not die in the field, but resistance to added to complexity is not always a bad thing. I know for myself, not an early adopter of tech, hence why I just got my first RDS on a pistol. Still, cool factor 10!
Maybe they can sell it commercially as the “Terminator” scope to offset costs?
I just want an optic that can automatically zero itself.
That's all.
uh you dumb bro? that is what it is doing by zeroing on the target based on distance & air temp & air pressure (likely the distance cal has built in earth curve in it & bullet drop based on what gun & round they finalize it to). The only thing extra it is missing vs a sniper is a wind speed & direction at the gun as snipers will often carry one but is too bulky to fit inside the unit but since they are shooting under 1000m with the new 6.8 it wouldnt get pushed enough to matter in the wind but does have wind per-selects if you know it which will help if they are making 1000+m shot which would be very rare for a non-sniper role. I will say the built in bearing is very cool and useful to telling others where to look or shoot but be more useful if it could button ranged every 200m and overlay it so you can call out 'bearing 30 at 200m" and they could find the target in like 1second (a basic system, it would have flaws on complex terrain but you could reference landmarks easier on those & be useful for cross-country firing which is like 70% of what was done in the middle east. . Regardless no idea why the laser range finder is so big - pretty sure they could make it 1/4 as tall so the whole unit is similar size to current scopes but maybe the AA batteries are on top making it that big.
@@JohnAdams-qc2ju lol 😆 the first thing you have to do with any scope is zero it to each individual shooter. Once the scope is zeroed Then you can apply all the little extras you are talkin about. You are telling me you know nothing about shooting or rifle Optics.
I would be interested to know how the sight copes with mirage, which is the boiling appearance you see at long range when air at different temperatures and densities refracts light. It’s a substantial factor on a hot day. I would think mirage would also refract the beam from the laser rangefinder. These are probably picky concerns that matter only at and beyond 500 yards. I think the overall concept is great. Optical sights improve pretty much everyone’s marksmanship. If range estimation and wind correction are nailed down then the same applies.
Not sure but it's shouldn't have too do much on the MCX spear because the suppresor was designed too flow and cool faster and coated specifically too combat mirage .
@@jonsingleton203 I was interested in mirage caused by atmospheric and ground heating, not simply by the suppressor.
Hmm valid question. The refraction of light will give inaccurate readings
I'm probably going to sound like a fudd with this take, but, it really sounds like the Army thinks they can pay their way out of training their soldiers. I'll keep my ACOG and cry about the eye relief being crappy.
Because you think they will give those type of weapon to noobs?? Lol. These are for spec ops.
@@elmichellangelo broski rewatch the video lol
@@colelawton4901 So simple yet so destructive lmao
With out leadership we can't even beat a bunch of cavemen,RIP to the fallen soldiers and civilians.
@@shawnbraggs1951 that's a matter of leadership, not a president but generals. We created and place fobs and bases at places of our choosing. We aren't so good at cohesive and coherent of our movements. We change tactics and command too often,we also choose to control points instead of regions. Simply put small time and small area control allows an area to be overwhelmed easily, in the same way that it's easier to swallow a penny vs swallowing a biscuit.
Can’t wait to see these get to the Guard and Reserve units 30 years from now.
They still don't trust them with weapons yet?
"Is going to have major shift to focus on long range engagements." As if this wasn't always the trend. If you can shoot someone before you are within their effective range...that is preferable. Now, good luck finding people in that situation when they know that is your play.
Ever heard about line-of-sight? :D
Estimates put 30% or more of the WW2 Japanese losses on Okinawa on the M3 Carbine and its revolutionary infrared system. Wasn't really the carbine itself, but the sight, the sighting system changed everything.