If you are a driving enthusiast and just drive around alone or as a couple, CX-3 If you need more space, HR-V If you need more space and you are a driving enthusiast, CX-5
+tokekkk I'm thinking instead of getting a fully loaded CX3 (which ive been saving up for a year now) maybe a mid-level CX5 2016 might be a more practical choice.
When it comes to looks and driving dynamics, Mazda CX-3 wins hands down. On the other hand, when it comes to reliability and functionality, you can beat the HR-V.
+WuWei Xu Actually, according to Consumer Reports, Mazdas are more reliable than Hondas. In 2014, Mazda was #3, Honda was #4. This year, Mazda was #2, and Honda was #8. TBD regarding these two new models.
cadsux Honestly, I'm not a huge fan of Consumer Reports. I find most of their information to be misleading on some counts. JD Power, on the hand, seems more reliable because they actually get their information from consumers. www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2015-us-initial-quality-study-iqs - Mazda is ranked pretty low in this survey. Seems like their vehicles experience quite a few problems, even when new. Talk about being a lemon.
Consumer reports is non-profit and surveys 1.1 million owners per year, and has been doing car surveys since the 1930s. JD Powers is a market research firm (thus can be influenced by $$$), has been surveying cars since the 1980s, surveys about 40,000 owners per year, and factors in dealer/service customer satisfaction. Which is why luxury brands rank high with JD Powers, and low with Consumer Reports. Consumer Reports rates cars at least after a year, and has Reliablility Guides which include models 10 or so years back. While JD Powers only goes 3 years in their dependability study. The point being is Honda quality has gone down, and I've owned Mazdas and Hondas.
cadsux I'm quite aware that Honda reliability has gone down in recent years, a shame really. But I'm also aware that Consumer Reports ranks car brands based on their road-test score and predicted reliability. Everyone needs to read this one quote from consumer reports: "A top score in our tests doesn’t mean a car will be reliable; conversely, reliable cars can-and do-score poorly in our road tests." All in all, I'd rather judge the reliability of a car based on those who have owned the car for a certain period of time (5 years or more for me).
Yes, CR buys their own cars and tests them for their scoring, but as I said, they also survey 1.1 million owners/ consumers per year for their Reliability Rating, which goes as far back as 10 years, as shown in their magazines and website
There's a bit of a misconception with the review of the trunk space in the CX-3. There's a two-way floor that allows you to either extend the cargo bay for taller items like your stroller there, or close it off and have a little secret compartment/hidden floor. Gives you a nice bit of extra room.
owned a 2002 honda crv...started to cost a fortune in repairs- ditched it for a cx-3. considered the hrv for one second...fell in love with the cx-3 in one second...zoom zoom. sport model with awd is under 22k...this car is so fun to drive.
I just drove these two models yesterday, as well as the Subaru Crosstrek. This was an excellent comparison and my experience driving both cars was similar to the reviewer. I opted for a used CX-3 from 2020 as I am not concerned with hauling a young family. The CX-3 was discontinued for the CX-30 as it does offer more cargo space, but I believe that added another 1k to the asking price and I was fine with the CX-3 space.
The CX-3 is looking to be the best "driver's" compact CUV by the press but does not offer a manual transmission and has less cargo/passenger space than HR-V. The HR-V offers a manual transmission and has loads more space but sacrifices sporting driving dynamics. So to sum it up, if you truly enjoy driving and need space, buy the Mazda 3 hatch 2.5L in a manual.
+Kai Liu that's correct but the cx3 is higher of the ground and gives you some minor off roading capabilities But if space is what you going for the Mazda 3 has bigger interior space and bigger boot space
Dammit why cant we have the best of both. I wouldn't be truly happy with either one of these. The Honda is a good size but lacks power and ugly interior. The Mazda looks beautiful but is a bit too small. Arrgg!
It's all about public demand. Most people don't want a sporty dynamic CUV. If they did, the CX-5 would be best in class rather than the CR-V. Most people just want a good crossover that does just about everything well. I can predict that the HR-V will outsell the CX-3 by a reasonable amount.
Its a shame there are so many compromises between the 2. I love the Mazda Styling, headlights and tech, even its driving dynamics are better... but then the Honda is better in every other way and probably way more reliable. WHYYYY
+Eric Xavier Mazda's reliability ratings have been going up ever since they split from Ford. Honda earned their reputation for reliability, while Mazda is still earning theirs. Honda is not invincible in the reliability department though. They had transmission issues in their Accords and don't forget the Takata airbag recalls.
What is with the 'Honda is more reliable than Mazda' comments? Does Honda's high sales and familiality mean they are more trusted? Mazda's reliability ratings have been sky high for so many years now.
I don't have kids & yet I chose the Honda HR-V. I like the looks better myself. The Mazda CX-3 seats were way too narrow. It drove a tad better then the HR-V, but overall the HR-V wins out. How about those cup holders on the CX-3? You need super gangling arms to reach them. No thanks. Honda=Practical.
+Samsomite looks like crap indeed.. same with their redesigned Fit... but hey, it also appears to be more practical than the CX-3 as tested in this video
I test drove both. If you are a single person or a couple and like driving the CX3 is the way to go. it looks young and modern. if you have 1 or 2 kids the HRV wins. I'm 6'1 and on the HRV and sat very comfortable behind the driver seat afet I sat on it. cargo space is double of the CX3 so a stroller should fit. The CVT on a Honda is slowwwww, but it's a family car. who cares about a manual, it's 2015 people, get over with! I like a stick shift but only in a real sports car that I will drive on the weekends. For a small crossover that will be is socal traffic you want a auto. now at my local Honda they didn't have any HRVS and only a basic manual one. They are asking 2k more of MSRP because according to them they are in high demand. So it end up like 27k for a fully loaded one, with that money you could get a Mazda cx5 touring. next year if I could get a hrv for less than 25k I'll buy if not I'll get the cx5. by the way Honda you should put LED headlamps and projector on your cars, yeah, very modern inside, but outside the HRV looks like a 2010 car. Mazda offers projectors! led, I want better visibility.
At 4:00 when you mentioned the HR-V's cargo cover and threw it out into the street, I thought a car passing by was going to run into it...But it was just the next scene with the CX-9 that made it sound that way. LOL
The demonstration with the baby stroller being difficult to put in the back of the CX-3 is a bit unfair. You can easily remove the cargo cover and it would fit in just fine. You can leave it off the car if you're going to be putting stuff in the back all the time. That said, that side by side shot between the CX-3 and HR-V showing the trunk opening clearly shows an advantage for the HR-V.
+Sam Pellegrene The CX-3 is better than Mazda's of past, but still a bit of drone. Their gram by gram analysis has done very well for reducing the weight of every vehicle in their line up - this is where every part is questioned as to if it's really required or can be changed to be lighter or removed completely. More noise supression equals more weight. They have listened to feedback and kept some noise deadening, but they still need more - even if its' another 20kg worth.
Just drove a cx3 today and its ok, not too great rear leg room or space in the back but a nice quiet drive...for some reason in sport mode it can become a little sticky in gears...so a little tone deaf in spots...still m 6'2" and 250lbs and it felt ok for me, no leg rubs, no cramped feel but maybe a little cheap in the interior plastics.
Just test drove both of these vehicles. The Honda has much better engineered space inside, more comfortable seats, smoother ride. I honestly didn't think the cx-3 was that fun to drive the Honda won in that category for me too. The cx-3 does look a lot cooler though.
+KonaKoo in those CUV's a car full of luggage is like two weekend bags and a bathroom pack....lol....don't have any kids over 10 years old cos the back is almost Porsche 911 backseats kind of small...nice headroom though for a tiny suv.
+Jacob Frazier-Martinez Are you being sarcastic? CVTs are plagued with problems compared to a traditional automatic, and aren't in the same league as a manual as far as reliaiblity. You have absolutely no idea of what you are talking about, please do some research and stop spreading FUD.
I like my cx5...the auto is a sweet sounding ride and the sports option turned on makes it a nice accelerator...I liked the Subaru forester but again, hearing that drone on the highway would drive me bonkers.
+sleeksilver No, I am not being sarcastic. All my information comes from personal experience. I own a 2015 Honda Accord and it has a CVT and I have never once had issues with it. My grandma owns a 2014 Honda Civic with a CVT and again no issues. My friend owns a 2014 Toyota Corolla and that has a CVT, but again no issues ever. Have you ever asked yourself, if these CVT's are as unreliable as I believe I wonder why so many car manufacturers are putting them in there cars? Even Germany is putting in CVT's for some of there cars. Wanna know why? Because they work. But yah know what I'll admit it, I'm not a mechanic I don't know the finer details of a Automatic vs a manual vs a CVT. Here's what I do know Commander skippy, I know that Honda gave me a product and it works. It runs, it goes, it takes all my music gear, and yah know it's one of the smoothest rides you'll ever have.
I own 03 EP3 and 2015 Mazda3. I can tell you I had zero issue with 03 civic si while mazda 3 is starting to show some problem already. Razor thin paint, cargo space that is laughable even for HB, and battery drain in 2 days. But the safety features on Mazda can not be beat.
I'm kind of torn, I was interested in the CX3 and still am but I was hoping it would utilize its space a little better. Its outer dimensions are almost the same as the HR-V but its inside dimensions are 40% less. Agree that the HRV is boring and I hated the CVT. I also somewhat need the height and was hoping it would be a little higher. I need the AWD as I might move back up north where it snows and its very convenient to have it equipped with some nice snow tires as well. At times in my area light flooding can occur, and though rare, it does still happen and I was hoping the CX3 might have a little more ground clearance. I love everything that the CX3 has, I just wish they the interior space was better utilized, and it was slightly higher off the ground. But I love the driving character of it, as I'm used to S2000's and STi's :P . I want to stay around the low 20's so this might push me toward another car somewhat near this market, which would be the Subaru XV crosstrek. The Crosstrek has more room than either the CX3, or HRV, it has a AWD standard which is nice, and has the extra clearance that I need for the light flooding I've seen in my area as of late. Things I don't like about the Crosstrek is where the CX3 excels at. Crosstrek design exterior and interior is a little bland especially compared to the CX3. I also don't like the CVT much in the Crosstrek but its not as bad as the HRV's CVT. I might save a little more and get the CX-5. It'll have the space I need, driving character I prefer, and its 8.5 inches of clearance will give me breathing room than the 6 inches the CX3 doesn't have. My current old CRV has 8.1 and just clears most of the flooding in my area. What I don't like is that its extra money that I didn't want to spend, and the insurance is also higher in the CX5 and Michigan Insurance is the highest in the nation. The Crosstrek is similarly priced with the CX3 and HRV with similar mpg, and operating cost. I might have to compromise with the Crosstrek, or save up more for the CX5. It doesn't help that my employment just announced that they're LOWeRING everyone's wages, FREEZING raises, (which I was due for my raise THAT WEEK ironically), taking AWAY tuition reimbursement, RAISING cost of benefits, and changing bonus structure so that it will also be lower. Yes looking for new employment hopefully that will pay me a bit more so I can get the Cx5 which I think would be the best match of what I need. ^_^;
I purchased the CX3 the third week they were out here in Texas (late August). I really like mine so far. If you purchase the HRV get ready to call ahead of time to merge onto the highway and make reservations. Its slow.... and I mean slow... CX3 is a great driver right off the showroom. Its easily tune-able through orange virus for an extra 20-25hp for around 450 dollars. I love all gadgets and stuff. The screen rocks. All in all I made a great choice and don't regret it.
+Steven Owens - Either way buy the Mazda. Its fine for a family as we have our 8 year old in the car seat in the back and he has plenty of room. The HRV is just not ready for the big time yet....
Hands down the CX-3 is the better looking and driving. That being said, I really think the thing to do is wait for Honda to filter down to the HR-V the new Civic engine- the 1.5L Turbo. It will then match or beat the CX-3 mileage plus out perform it in all stoplight races (if that is your thing).
+jtbteg Thanks for the tip - I found it (finally) MotorTrend Review at: www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1506_the_big_test_2015_2016_subcompact_crossovers/?fullsite=true Or on Mobile at: m.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1506_the_big_test_2015_2016_subcompact_crossovers/
I think this is the first comparison video I've seen where the HR-v edges the Mazda. Valid points but the lack of power in that HR-V is a sticking point for me. Cannot imagine merging onto a busy interstate with a car full of kids with that HR-V - but I'm biased!
If looks count for anything, then the Mazda wins, HANDS DOWN, not only against the little Honda, but against almost every vehicle on the current market.
This is such a redundant category of vehicle. CR-Vs and CX-5s aren't really big and unless if you live in a very tight city, there should be no problems with those cars, especially with the backup cameras for parallel parking.
+WretchedDrake I agree, but the CX3 has a much tighter turning circle, which gives you the edge when locating an available parking spot in a crowded city. Trust me, i know this first hand.
I'm 5'11 and have more than enough room for my head... If you over 6'2'' HRV is not your car, but if you under that height, you will be more than fine.
+Michael j I am 6'2", it felt tight and then I found the seat height was at full height so I got to wind it down...more room then the passenger side of a 4 runner.
2-wheel drive small crossovers are useless. The first generation Focus Wagon fits a large stroller along the trunk, not across, and there is plenty of extra space left. It handles great and has enough passenger inside. And it looks better than the HR-V, which is just plain ugly (the CX-3 looks awesome, though). It is a shame that Ford does not offer the Focus Wagon in North America anymore.
mazda 3 has same amount of trunk space as cx3 by picture which is really small. My old ep3 has bigger trunk than cx3. One reason i regret buying mazda.
so...buy the Fit/Civic or the Mazda3 for a better overall vehicle....got it. Too many compromises with this size of CUV and not enough space to enjoy it.
nice comparo video. I don't know y this channel when it does comparo vids, u won't show a 0-60 test unless it's some type of high HP cars. remember AUTO GUIDE, moms and dads need to a have a lil fun even if they have babies
Michael Leibowitz hahhahahah, yep it probably is but it's nice to know. the reason why I made that comment is because my CX 5 is faster than a CRV RAV4 and a ROGUE. it was 1 of the determining factors of why I got the MAZDA vs all the others
If you are a driving enthusiast and just drive around alone or as a couple, CX-3
If you need more space, HR-V
If you need more space and you are a driving enthusiast, CX-5
+tokekkk I'm thinking instead of getting a fully loaded CX3 (which ive been saving up for a year now) maybe a mid-level CX5 2016 might be a more practical choice.
+Jeff Mendoza Yes it would
+tokekkk I think you meant X5
Brian C nope
I'm wondering how the CX3 / HRV fares on long road trips...
Excellent comparison. The part where you compared rear hatch size by using the stroller as a benchmark was most eye opening!!
note to self " this guy is a good reviewer
When it comes to looks and driving dynamics, Mazda CX-3 wins hands down. On the other hand, when it comes to reliability and functionality, you can beat the HR-V.
+WuWei Xu Actually, according to Consumer Reports, Mazdas are more reliable than Hondas. In 2014, Mazda was #3, Honda was #4. This year, Mazda was #2, and Honda was #8. TBD regarding these two new models.
cadsux Honestly, I'm not a huge fan of Consumer Reports. I find most of their information to be misleading on some counts. JD Power, on the hand, seems more reliable because they actually get their information from consumers. www.jdpower.com/press-releases/2015-us-initial-quality-study-iqs - Mazda is ranked pretty low in this survey. Seems like their vehicles experience quite a few problems, even when new. Talk about being a lemon.
Consumer reports is non-profit and surveys 1.1 million owners per year, and has been doing car surveys since the 1930s. JD Powers is a market research firm (thus can be influenced by $$$), has been surveying cars since the 1980s, surveys about 40,000 owners per year, and factors in dealer/service customer satisfaction. Which is why luxury brands rank high with JD Powers, and low with Consumer Reports. Consumer Reports rates cars at least after a year, and has Reliablility Guides which include models 10 or so years back. While JD Powers only goes 3 years in their dependability study. The point being is Honda quality has gone down, and I've owned Mazdas and Hondas.
cadsux I'm quite aware that Honda reliability has gone down in recent years, a shame really. But I'm also aware that Consumer Reports ranks car brands based on their road-test score and predicted reliability.
Everyone needs to read this one quote from consumer reports: "A top score in our tests doesn’t mean a car will be reliable; conversely, reliable cars can-and do-score poorly in our road tests."
All in all, I'd rather judge the reliability of a car based on those who have owned the car for a certain period of time (5 years or more for me).
Yes, CR buys their own cars and tests them for their scoring, but as I said, they also survey 1.1 million owners/ consumers per year for their Reliability Rating, which goes as far back as 10 years, as shown in their magazines and website
don't throw away that cargo cover, it's not cheap
Mazda is definitely about fun to drive, good looks, and gas mileage. Honda is about practicality. Honda is boring.
+Turbo4Life1217
Honda offers a manual transmission in the HR-V. You can't get that in the Mazda.
+Michael Leibowitz Only if you're in The US. In other parts of the world the CX-3 does come in manual derivatives
If CX-3 have a bigger trunk space for luggage I would buy it. Now HR-V is a better choice.
There's a bit of a misconception with the review of the trunk space in the CX-3. There's a two-way floor that allows you to either extend the cargo bay for taller items like your stroller there, or close it off and have a little secret compartment/hidden floor. Gives you a nice bit of extra room.
owned a 2002 honda crv...started to cost a fortune in repairs- ditched it for a cx-3. considered the hrv for one second...fell in love with the cx-3 in one second...zoom zoom. sport model with awd is under 22k...this car is so fun to drive.
I just drove these two models yesterday, as well as the Subaru Crosstrek. This was an excellent comparison and my experience driving both cars was similar to the reviewer. I opted for a used CX-3 from 2020 as I am not concerned with hauling a young family. The CX-3 was discontinued for the CX-30 as it does offer more cargo space, but I believe that added another 1k to the asking price and I was fine with the CX-3 space.
The CX-3 is looking to be the best "driver's" compact CUV by the press but does not offer a manual transmission and has less cargo/passenger space than HR-V. The HR-V offers a manual transmission and has loads more space but sacrifices sporting driving dynamics. So to sum it up, if you truly enjoy driving and need space, buy the Mazda 3 hatch 2.5L in a manual.
+J Fazzuoli I don't think you are correct. In Canada ( I don't know if you live in the US) you get the manual transmission
+MrArminkwk No manual transmission is offered on the CX-3 in Canada
Yes you are right I did some more research. I thought I saw a manual transmission in the dealership, but I was wrong :)
mazda 3 hatch has more interior space than cx-3?
+Kai Liu that's correct but the cx3 is higher of the ground and gives you some minor off roading capabilities
But if space is what you going for the Mazda 3 has bigger interior space and bigger boot space
I like how you guys assessed the sear space after putting a infant seat in. that makes your review super helpful!!!
Dammit why cant we have the best of both. I wouldn't be truly happy with either one of these. The Honda is a good size but lacks power and ugly interior. The Mazda looks beautiful but is a bit too small. Arrgg!
af1rs2jl I so agree with you! I really like the HR-V, but it soooo needs a 1.5 turbo in it!
Mazda has bigger suvs
The HR-V needs that 1.5L turbocharged engine the 2016 Civic has.
It's all about public demand. Most people don't want a sporty dynamic CUV. If they did, the CX-5 would be best in class rather than the CR-V. Most people just want a good crossover that does just about everything well. I can predict that the HR-V will outsell the CX-3 by a reasonable amount.
It is becoming a sad under powered world...
hang on, i thought the hrv is front wheel drive only? ...
or is it only in aus?
What about crash safety?
Mazda cars has been stunning lately, CX3, CX5, Mazda3, Mazda5 and Mazda6. They need to start putting black color headliner like Mercedes and BMW.
Was this video shot in Burlington or Milton Ontario by chance? Some of the areas in the video look familiar
It was indeed
If you value driving enjoyment at all, there is no comparison. The Mazda wins.
The reason why Craig Cole wasn't able to do this comparison, he is "making babies"!
A really excellent review, told me everything I could ever need to know.
are they all wheel drive?
Its a shame there are so many compromises between the 2. I love the Mazda Styling, headlights and tech, even its driving dynamics are better... but then the Honda is better in every other way and probably way more reliable.
WHYYYY
+Eric Xavier HR-V is slow and boring handling.
That is true but it will also have better reliability ratings and it's much more comfortable in the inside so it all comes down to compromise
Eric Xavier Mazda has been in the top 5 for reliability.
Can I have both then? Lol
+Eric Xavier Mazda's reliability ratings have been going up ever since they split from Ford. Honda earned their reputation for reliability, while Mazda is still earning theirs. Honda is not invincible in the reliability department though. They had transmission issues in their Accords and don't forget the Takata airbag recalls.
What is with the 'Honda is more reliable than Mazda' comments? Does Honda's high sales and familiality mean they are more trusted? Mazda's reliability ratings have been sky high for so many years now.
I don't have kids & yet I chose the Honda HR-V. I like the looks better myself. The Mazda CX-3 seats were way too narrow. It drove a tad better then the HR-V, but overall the HR-V wins out. How about those cup holders on the CX-3? You need super gangling arms to reach them. No thanks. Honda=Practical.
Alex Moore How is the HR-V when merging onto the highway for you?
C to the X with a 3 vs H to the R with a V...
There is a big difference in the cargo loading areas on these two vehicles - the HRV is much larger.
been waiting for this comparison video!
Interior cabin noise? Seat comfort? Lumbar? Cabin storage? Quality of interior? Wheres this info?
The Honda looks like utter crap in comparison to Mazda.
Fo real tho man
So...it'll still outsell the CX-3
+Samsomite looks like crap indeed.. same with their redesigned Fit... but hey, it also appears to be more practical than the CX-3 as tested in this video
+Vlican No, it isn't. read the Car and Driver review. Mazda won, HR-V came in second to last and it was stated it wasn't that practical.
sleeksilver guess even car reviewers have different opinions.. "shocking"
The CX-3 just came in first in Car and Driver's comparison test, and the HR-V fourth. I'd trust C&D over these people any day of the week.
For those who find the CRV and CX5 too big but want to spend just as much...
funny you say that about headroom... im 6'2" and a lack of headroom and seat not going low enough contributed to me trading in my 2016 accord.
I test drove both.
If you are a single person or a couple and like driving the CX3 is the way to go. it looks young and modern.
if you have 1 or 2 kids the HRV wins. I'm 6'1 and on the HRV and sat very comfortable behind the driver seat afet I sat on it.
cargo space is double of the CX3 so a stroller should fit.
The CVT on a Honda is slowwwww, but it's a family car. who cares about a manual, it's 2015 people, get over with! I like a stick shift but only in a real sports car that I will drive on the weekends. For a small crossover that will be is socal traffic you want a auto.
now at my local Honda they didn't have any HRVS and only a basic manual one. They are asking 2k more of MSRP because according to them they are in high demand. So it end up like 27k for a fully loaded one, with that money you could get a Mazda cx5 touring.
next year if I could get a hrv for less than 25k I'll buy if not I'll get the cx5. by the way Honda you should put LED headlamps and projector on your cars, yeah, very modern inside, but outside the HRV looks like a 2010 car. Mazda offers projectors! led, I want better visibility.
Excellent review and surprisingly no dislike for the video so far which i always wonder where they come from
CX-3 is much better looking exterior and interior than the HRV.
At 4:00 when you mentioned the HR-V's cargo cover and threw it out into the street, I thought a car passing by was going to run into it...But it was just the next scene with the CX-9 that made it sound that way. LOL
Well done video
He should have mentioned that the sunroof is eating up his head room. It's perfectly fine on the LX model.
The demonstration with the baby stroller being difficult to put in the back of the CX-3 is a bit unfair. You can easily remove the cargo cover and it would fit in just fine. You can leave it off the car if you're going to be putting stuff in the back all the time. That said, that side by side shot between the CX-3 and HR-V showing the trunk opening clearly shows an advantage for the HR-V.
Hows road noise in the Cx-3? I've heard Mazda is a little weak in this area.
+Sam Pellegrene The CX-3 is better than Mazda's of past, but still a bit of drone. Their gram by gram analysis has done very well for reducing the weight of every vehicle in their line up - this is where every part is questioned as to if it's really required or can be changed to be lighter or removed completely. More noise supression equals more weight. They have listened to feedback and kept some noise deadening, but they still need more - even if its' another 20kg worth.
Just drove a cx3 today and its ok, not too great rear leg room or space in the back but a nice quiet drive...for some reason in sport mode it can become a little sticky in gears...so a little tone deaf in spots...still m 6'2" and 250lbs and it felt ok for me, no leg rubs, no cramped feel but maybe a little cheap in the interior plastics.
Just test drove both of these vehicles. The Honda has much better engineered space inside, more comfortable seats, smoother ride. I honestly didn't think the cx-3 was that fun to drive the Honda won in that category for me too. The cx-3 does look a lot cooler though.
Honda vezel just looks cute and perfect in all the right places
I like that you guys used the infant seat to measure leg room
@2:13 awkward moment when there's more than an inch between Mike's buzz and the headliner.
I'm slouching a bit so I can see out the windshield.
+Mike Schlee I found that the rear view mirror was getting a little maxed out to give me a rear view.
Totally forgot about the HR-V having a CVT. That sounds fun to deal with on the highway with a car full of luggage.
CVT's are more reliable and consistent than manuals. What are you talking about?
+KonaKoo in those CUV's a car full of luggage is like two weekend bags and a bathroom pack....lol....don't have any kids over 10 years old cos the back is almost Porsche 911 backseats kind of small...nice headroom though for a tiny suv.
+Jacob Frazier-Martinez Are you being sarcastic? CVTs are plagued with problems compared to a traditional automatic, and aren't in the same league as a manual as far as reliaiblity. You have absolutely no idea of what you are talking about, please do some research and stop spreading FUD.
I like my cx5...the auto is a sweet sounding ride and the sports option turned on makes it a nice accelerator...I liked the Subaru forester but again, hearing that drone on the highway would drive me bonkers.
+sleeksilver No, I am not being sarcastic. All my information comes from personal experience. I own a 2015 Honda Accord and it has a CVT and I have never once had issues with it. My grandma owns a 2014 Honda Civic with a CVT and again no issues. My friend owns a 2014 Toyota Corolla and that has a CVT, but again no issues ever. Have you ever asked yourself, if these CVT's are as unreliable as I believe I wonder why so many car manufacturers are putting them in there cars? Even Germany is putting in CVT's for some of there cars. Wanna know why? Because they work. But yah know what I'll admit it, I'm not a mechanic I don't know the finer details of a Automatic vs a manual vs a CVT. Here's what I do know Commander skippy, I know that Honda gave me a product and it works. It runs, it goes, it takes all my music gear, and yah know it's one of the smoothest rides you'll ever have.
It Seems. Thanks For Helping. different flap What's your opinion about it
I own 03 EP3 and 2015 Mazda3. I can tell you I had zero issue with 03 civic si while mazda 3 is starting to show some problem already. Razor thin paint, cargo space that is laughable even for HB, and battery drain in 2 days. But the safety features on Mazda can not be beat.
+spike378 My friends Honda CRV battery failed under warranty!
I am looking Honda HRV 2016 any suggestions with good deal or bad deal? Thank you!
cvt is not so great, in any car at all, if you dont mind that creepy gearbox then buy it, its honda, a really reliable car
Tracy Aukerman the hrv has paddle shifters. you can have as much fun as you want.
Mazda cx3 any day over that Honda
I'm kind of torn, I was interested in the CX3 and still am but I was hoping it would utilize its space a little better. Its outer dimensions are almost the same as the HR-V but its inside dimensions are 40% less. Agree that the HRV is boring and I hated the CVT.
I also somewhat need the height and was hoping it would be a little higher. I need the AWD as I might move back up north where it snows and its very convenient to have it equipped with some nice snow tires as well. At times in my area light flooding can occur, and though rare, it does still happen and I was hoping the CX3 might have a little more ground clearance.
I love everything that the CX3 has, I just wish they the interior space was better utilized, and it was slightly higher off the ground. But I love the driving character of it, as I'm used to S2000's and STi's :P . I want to stay around the low 20's so this might push me toward another car somewhat near this market, which would be the Subaru XV crosstrek.
The Crosstrek has more room than either the CX3, or HRV, it has a AWD standard which is nice, and has the extra clearance that I need for the light flooding I've seen in my area as of late. Things I don't like about the Crosstrek is where the CX3 excels at. Crosstrek design exterior and interior is a little bland especially compared to the CX3. I also don't like the CVT much in the Crosstrek but its not as bad as the HRV's CVT.
I might save a little more and get the CX-5. It'll have the space I need, driving character I prefer, and its 8.5 inches of clearance will give me breathing room than the 6 inches the CX3 doesn't have. My current old CRV has 8.1 and just clears most of the flooding in my area.
What I don't like is that its extra money that I didn't want to spend, and the insurance is also higher in the CX5 and Michigan Insurance is the highest in the nation.
The Crosstrek is similarly priced with the CX3 and HRV with similar mpg, and operating cost.
I might have to compromise with the Crosstrek, or save up more for the CX5. It doesn't help that my employment just announced that they're LOWeRING everyone's wages, FREEZING raises, (which I was due for my raise THAT WEEK ironically), taking AWAY tuition reimbursement, RAISING cost of benefits, and changing bonus structure so that it will also be lower.
Yes looking for new employment hopefully that will pay me a bit more so I can get the Cx5 which I think would be the best match of what I need. ^_^;
I purchased the CX3 the third week they were out here in Texas (late August). I really like mine so far. If you purchase the HRV get ready to call ahead of time to merge onto the highway and make reservations. Its slow.... and I mean slow... CX3 is a great driver right off the showroom. Its easily tune-able through orange virus for an extra 20-25hp for around 450 dollars. I love all gadgets and stuff. The screen rocks. All in all I made a great choice and don't regret it.
+Steven Owens - Either way buy the Mazda. Its fine for a family as we have our 8 year old in the car seat in the back and he has plenty of room. The HRV is just not ready for the big time yet....
I tried the CX-3 but felt underpowered. I ended up with a Mazda 3 and am glad I didn't settle.
+fukthegoog it's a good looking car but it felt sluggish to me. sport mode just holds revs higher before it switches gears
+fukthegoog good for you dude. there can be more than 1 opinion
I'm actually trying to choose between a Honda HR-V and Subaru Crosstrek. Does anyone have any input?
Hands down the CX-3 is the better looking and driving. That being said, I really think the thing to do is wait for Honda to filter down to the HR-V the new Civic engine- the 1.5L Turbo. It will then match or beat the CX-3 mileage plus out perform it in all stoplight races (if that is your thing).
Congrats on the little one.
Guys .. what a great first compression video for this segment.. I wonder how is the Nissan Juke will stand against his new competitors??
We have a full multi vehicle comparison of subcompact crossovers coming soon.
+Mike Schlee great review mike and best of luck on ur up coming one.
+Mike Schlee excellent! looking forward to that one
Good review - very thorough. But, I gotta ask, how do these compare to the Juke or XV Crosstrek? Sounds like a challenge coming.... :)
+Subaru4me motortrend has an article on juke vs xv crosstrek vs hr-v vs cx-3 vs renegade vs trax on their website if you are interested.
+jtbteg Thanks for the tip - I found it (finally) MotorTrend Review at: www.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1506_the_big_test_2015_2016_subcompact_crossovers/?fullsite=true
Or on Mobile at: m.motortrend.com/roadtests/suvs/1506_the_big_test_2015_2016_subcompact_crossovers/
_ I love that Star Trek references great job on that video
This CX3 is selling like crazy in Japan.
Over here we get it with a 1.5 diesel
+Bruno Danese you might wanna check those diesel numbers...lol.
Check diesel numbers?
What do you mean?
I think this is the first comparison video I've seen where the HR-v edges the Mazda. Valid points but the lack of power in that HR-V is a sticking point for me. Cannot imagine merging onto a busy interstate with a car full of kids with that HR-V - but I'm biased!
If looks count for anything, then the Mazda wins, HANDS DOWN, not only against the little Honda, but against almost every vehicle on the current market.
over under sideways down meh try getting your golf clubs in a Mazda.
This is such a redundant category of vehicle. CR-Vs and CX-5s aren't really big and unless if you live in a very tight city, there should be no problems with those cars, especially with the backup cameras for parallel parking.
+WretchedDrake I agree, but the CX3 has a much tighter turning circle, which gives you the edge when locating an available parking spot in a crowded city. Trust me, i know this first hand.
HRV is the best car I could ever own
Hey there. You're A Winner. four control What's your opinion about it, guys !
I'm 5'11 and have more than enough room for my head... If you over 6'2'' HRV is not your car, but if you under that height, you will be more than fine.
+Michael j I am 6'2", it felt tight and then I found the seat height was at full height so I got to wind it down...more room then the passenger side of a 4 runner.
CX-3 Wins Anytime Any Day Any Time Any Year Any Month
Mazda has styling down and handling. And that's it.
You can't get a manual transmission in the CX-3 which is why I'd prefer the Honda.
Heya, It's really astounding guess equable What do you think?
Hey there, You've Earned My Respect. tame burly What's your opinion about it !!
5:41-5:42 mazda clearance... ?
good vid man
I love my 2016 Mazda CX-3!!!!
If you don't have kids why would you get either of these tho?
Hi, It's A Masterpiece! thaw scene What's your opinion about that
kinda left out the sport mode in the hrv, also the back up cameras. this guy didn't really know what he was doing.
why a cx3 over the Mazda 3??
+Pascal Leduc optional AWD and ride height
+Pascal Leduc and its a mazda 2 turned into a cx3, not a mazda 3....so its smaller then a mazda 3.
Forget the Honda go for the CX3 if you are single or a couple with no kids and if you do have kids or need bigger cargo area go for the Mazda CX5
Honda great build quality, but all their range is pretty boring to drive. The Mazda would be my choice.
is that his son in the vid? ^_^
Yup. His You Tube debut.
Those three vents are there to prevent a warp core breach! LOL
Great small SUV Mazda CX-3 grand Touring!!! Love her I named it ROXY😎🤗😎
30k for vehicles that can't even get out of their own way ?? You cannot we serious !
I would choose the Mazda cx-3 it look so better.
2-wheel drive small crossovers are useless. The first generation Focus Wagon fits a large stroller along the trunk, not across, and there is plenty of extra space left. It handles great and has enough passenger inside. And it looks better than the HR-V, which is just plain ugly (the CX-3 looks awesome, though). It is a shame that Ford does not offer the Focus Wagon in North America anymore.
What's the point of a crossover with lousy cargo space? If I want fun to drive, I wouldn't be looking at a crossover is the first place.
I always feel like the CX-3 looks like a slightly raised up Mazda 3 hatch....
The cx3 crossover was the same exact specifications on cooley's review. Lol
Dont carry inside space，still love Cx 3
These are ok, but I found them underpowered. Hard to pass on the highway. I think the Juke will be more popular because of the extra power.
mazda 3 has same amount of trunk space as cx3 by picture which is really small. My old ep3 has bigger trunk than cx3. One reason i regret buying mazda.
so...buy the Fit/Civic or the Mazda3 for a better overall vehicle....got it. Too many compromises with this size of CUV and not enough space to enjoy it.
nice comparo video. I don't know y this channel when it does comparo vids, u won't show a 0-60 test unless it's some type of high HP cars. remember AUTO GUIDE, moms and dads need to a have a lil fun even if they have babies
+93remix
With about 145 hp and 3,000 pounds, I imagine the 0-60 is bad...really, really bad.
Michael Leibowitz hahhahahah, yep it probably is but it's nice to know. the reason why I made that comment is because my CX 5 is faster than a CRV RAV4 and a ROGUE. it was 1 of the determining factors of why I got the MAZDA vs all the others
Your old sports car clunker is real expensive!
Somebody with some pull tell Honda to up those hp and tq numbers. And do it without sacrificing any of the good things.
great compare