Allen & Heath Xone:92 Limited Edition demo

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @gal3sz
    @gal3sz 2 місяці тому +5

    You are a real one Thank You for the demo!!!The filter popping and phono preamps upgrade makes this mixer 10/10 for me!Always loved the eq's on the original too.Owned the original Xone 92 with silver faceplate for like 10+ years and I loved it even with those known issues.Then I went for the Xone 96 4 years ago as the "upgrade" while it was in many ways and I still love that mixer the quality on it is questionable for me.(Fader felt cheap and fragile although im not a fader smasher, got incredibly hot should have had an external power brick, and the paint from my faceplate started peeling off from a mixer only used at home and kept clean this things for me on a new less then 3 year old mixer is a no go)Went back to a newer built brand new Xone 92 and my unit has no issues and the filter popping was very minimal.Sold it as I seen this one announced, wish could have kept it though.... Looking forward to this one to arrive!

    • @SameMan020
      @SameMan020 2 місяці тому +1

      I totally agree with you about the xone 96. I sold mine after 3 months and and I bought model 1.4

    • @gal3sz
      @gal3sz 2 місяці тому +1

      @@SameMan020 Yeah it's a shame really, it's not a bad mixer at all.Had the Model 1.4 for a month and returned it while the window was open.Are you satisfied with it?Really liked the form factor and no crossfader.Fader curve felt a bit more aggressive then on the xone mixers.Master eq really should have been an isolator.EQ section as filters with freq cuts is nice though it felt like30-40% of filter needs to turned up to have some change.Dual filters are a must the single filter didn't do it for me.Hype around the mixer was bigger then the product for me,preffered my Xone 92 still.Elara 4 would have been a nice choice but those phono preamps only on ch 1-2 was a dealbreaker for me.

    • @SameMan020
      @SameMan020 2 місяці тому

      @@gal3sz The Model 1.4 is great. I've had it for about a year. Just the printing is bad. The fader curve at the begging was a little bit strange but i got used to it.

    • @alias_mino
      @alias_mino 2 місяці тому

      which of the two mixer has faders with less resistance? i like doing tricks and the looser the fader is the easier it is for me

    • @gal3sz
      @gal3sz 2 місяці тому +1

      @@alias_mino Xone 92 and Model 1.4 faders are without resistance.

  • @romainbugat3874
    @romainbugat3874 2 місяці тому +2

    Hello, could you please tell me if the mixer is manufactured in China or in England?

    • @giode
      @giode  2 місяці тому

      On the bottom it says MADE IN CHINA.

  • @ArturaMuddra
    @ArturaMuddra Місяць тому +1

    And you still can't hear the filters while cueing 😂 .. WHY! this is just so stupid for that price of a Mixer! I buy one of these and hust shocked

  • @andreagallego6702
    @andreagallego6702 2 місяці тому

    do you know if it is possible to change the Cue configuration as it can be made in the xone 96?

    • @giode
      @giode  2 місяці тому

      @@andreagallego6702 not possible.

    • @andreagallego6702
      @andreagallego6702 2 місяці тому

      @@giode thank you!

  • @LouisSerieusement
    @LouisSerieusement 2 місяці тому

    cool ^^

  • @djbobrokk723
    @djbobrokk723 Місяць тому

    IMHO it's better 96 (again) 😉

  • @cryptout
    @cryptout Місяць тому

    I don't understand why they mess with the eq curves and filter. This is a dealbreaker for me.

    • @giode
      @giode  Місяць тому

      I think it's a good update. I remember talking about the old 92 with my techno friends and we agreed that it's basically a 3 EQ knob mixer based on how much you get to use them.

    • @cryptout
      @cryptout Місяць тому

      @@giode I use all 4 knobs on my 92, but to each their own. Thanks for the review.